DOCSLIB.ORG

470 Part 294—Special Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
470 Part 294—Special Areas § 293.17 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition) (iii) The portage from Back Bay to under appropriate conditions deter- Pipestone Bay of Basswood Lake. mined by the Chief, Forest Service. (iv) The portages from Fall Lake to (b) Grazing of domestic livestock, de- Newton Lake to Pipestone Bay of Bass- velopment of water storage projects wood Lake. which do not involve road construc- (v) The portage from Vermilion Lake tion, and improvements necessary for to Trout Lake. the protection of the National Forests (2) The Forest Service may authorize, may be permitted, subject to such re- by special use permit, the use of motor strictions as the Chief, Forest Service, vehicles to transport watercraft over deems desirable. Within Primitive the following portages: Areas, when the use is for other than (i) Four Mile Portage From Fall administrative needs of the Forest Lake to Hoist Bay of Basswood Lake. Service, use by other Federal agencies (ii) Vermilion Lake to Trout Lake. when authorized by the Chief, and in (iii) Prairie Portage from Sucker emergencies, the landing of aircraft Lake to Basswood Lake and the use of motorboats are prohib- (iv) Loon River to Loon Lake and ited on National Forest land or water from Loon Lake to Lac La Croix. unless such use by aircraft or motor- (c) Snowmobile use. (1) A snowmobile boats has already become well estab- is defined as a self-propelled, motorized lished, the use of motor vehicles is pro- vehicle not exceeding forty inches in hibited, and the use of other motorized width designed to operate on ice and equipment is prohibited except as au- snow, having a ski or skiis in contact thorized by the Chief. These restric- with the snow and driven by a track or tions are not intended as limitations tracks. on statutory rights of ingress and (2) The Forest Service permits use of egress or of prospecting, locating, and snowmobiles only on the following developing mineral resources. routes: (c) All prohibitions for those areas of (i) The overland portages in Saint National Forest classified as Primitive Louis County from Crane Lake to Lit- on the effective date of the Wilderness tle Vermilion Lake in Canada. Act, September 3, 1964, are in part 261. (ii) The route in Cook County from (78 Stat. 890, 16 U.S.C. 1131–1136; 74 Stat. 215, Sea Gull River along the eastern por- 16 U.S.C. 528–531) tion of Saganage Lake to Canada. [38 FR 5855, Mar. 5, 1973, as amended at 42 FR (3) The Forest Service may issue spe- 35960, July 13, 1977] cial-use authorizations to use snowmo- biles for the grooming of specified cross-country ski trails near existing PART 294—SPECIAL AREAS resorts. Subpart A—Miscellaneous Provisions [50 FR 16231, Apr. 25, 1985] Sec. § 293.17 National Forest Primitive 294.1 Recreation areas. Areas. 294.2 Navigation of aircraft within airspace reservation over the Boundary Waters (a) Within those areas of National Canoe Area Wilderness, Superior Na- Forests classified as Primitive on the ef- tional Forest, Minnesota. fective date of the Wilderness Act, Sep- 294.3–294.9 [Reserved] tember 3, 1964, there shall be no roads or other provision for motorized trans- Subpart B—State Petitions for Inventoried portation, no commercial timber cut- Roadless Area Management ting, and no occupancy under special- use permit for hotels, stores, resorts, 294.10 Purpose. 294.11 Definition. summer homes, organization camps, 294.12 State petitions. hunting and fishing lodges, or similar 294.13 Petition process. uses: Provided, That existing roads over 294.14 Petition contents. National Forest lands reserved from 294.15 Advisory committee review. the public domain and roads necessary 294.16 State-specific rulemaking. for the exercise of a statutory right of 294.17 Scope and applicability. ingress and egress may be allowed 294.18 Severability. 470 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 25, 2020 Jkt 250145 PO 00000 Frm 00480 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\36\36V2.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB Forest Service, USDA § 294.2 Subpart C—Idaho Roadless Area (b) Areas which should be managed Management for public recreation requiring develop- ment and substantial improvements 294.20 Purpose. 294.21 Definitions. may be given special classification as 294.22 Idaho Roadless Areas. public recreation areas. Areas in single 294.23 Road construction and reconstruction tracts of not more than 160 acres may in Idaho Roadless Areas. be approved and classified by the Chief 294.24 Timber cutting, sale, or removal in of the Forest Service or by such offi- Idaho Roadless Areas. cers as he may designate. Areas in ex- 294.25 Mineral activities in Idaho Roadless cess of 160 acres will be classified by Areas. 294.26 Other activities in Idaho Roadless the Secretary of Agriculture. Classi- Areas. fication hereunder may include areas 294.27 Corrections and modifications. used or selected to be used for the de- 294.28 Scope and applicability. velopment and maintenance as camp 294.29 List of designated Idaho Roadless grounds, picnic grounds, organization Areas. camps, resorts, public service sites (such as for restaurants, filling sta- Subpart D—Colorado Roadless Area tions, stores, horse and boat liveries, Management garages, and similar types of public 294.40 Purpose. service accommodations), bathing 294.41 Definitions. beaches, winter sports areas, lodges, 294.42 Prohibitions on tree cutting, sale, or and similar facilities and appurtenant removal. structures needed by the public to 294.43 Prohibition on road construction and reconstruction. enjoy the recreation resources of the 294.44 Prohibition on linear construction national forests. The boundaries of all zones. areas so classified shall be clearly 294.45 Environmental documentation. marked on the ground and notices of 294.46 Other activities. such classification shall be posted at 294.47 Modifications and administrative cor- conspicuous places thereon. Areas clas- rections. sified under this section shall thereby 294.48 Scope and applicability. 294.49 List of designated Colorado Roadless be set apart and reserved for public Areas. recreation use and such classification shall constitute a formal closing of the Subpart A—Miscellaneous area to any use or occupancy incon- Provisions sistent with the classification. [38 FR 5859, Mar. 5, 1973, as amended at 66 FR AUTHORITY: 16 U.S.C. 472, 551, and 1131. 3272, Jan. 12, 2001] § 294.1 Recreation areas. § 294.2 Navigation of aircraft within airspace reservation over the Suitable areas of national forest Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wil- land, other than wilderness or wild derness, Superior National Forest, areas, which should be managed prin- Minnesota. cipally for recreation use may be given special classification as follows: (a) Description of areas. Sections (a) Areas which should be managed 294.2(b) to 294.2(f), inclusive, apply to principally for recreation use substan- those areas of land and water in the tially in their natural condition and on Counties of Cook, Lake, and St. Louis, which, in the discretion of the officer State of Minnesota, within the exterior making the classification, certain boundaries of the Superior National other uses may or may not be per- Forest, which have heretofore been des- mitted may be approved and classified ignated by the Secretary of Agri- by the Chief of the Forest Service or by culture as the Superior Roadless Area, such officers as he may designate if the the Little Indian Sioux Roadless Area, particular area is less than 100,000 and the Caribou Roadless Area, respec- acres. Areas of 100,000 acres or more tively, and to the airspace over said will be approved and classified by the areas and below the altitude of 4,000 Secretary of Agriculture. feet above sea level. Said areas are 471 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 25, 2020 Jkt 250145 PO 00000 Frm 00481 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\36\36V2.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB §§ 294.3–294.9 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition) more particularly described in the Ex- § 294.10 Purpose. ecutive order setting apart said air- The purpose of these administrative space as an airspace reservation (E.O. procedures is to set forth a process for 10092, Dec. 17, 1949; 3 CFR 1949 Supp.). State-specific rulemaking to address Copies of said Executive order may be the management of inventoried obtained on request from the Forest roadless areas in areas where the Sec- Supervisor, Superior National Forest, retary determines that regulatory di- Duluth, Minnesota (hereinafter called rection is appropriate based on a peti- Forest Supervisor). tion from the affected Governor. (b) Emergency landing and rescue oper- ations. The pilot of any aircraft landing § 294.11 Definition. within any of said areas for reasons of Inventoried roadless areas—Areas iden- emergency or for conducting rescue op- tified in a set of inventoried roadless erations, shall inform the Forest Su- area maps, contained in the Forest pervisor within seven days after the Service Roadless Area Conservation, termination of the emergency or the Final Environmental Impact State- completion of the rescue operation as ment, Volume 2, dated November 2000, to the date, place, and duration of and any subsequent update or revision landing, and the type and registration of those maps through the land man- number of the aircraft. agement planning process. (c) Low flights. Any person making a flight within said airspace reservation § 294.12 State petitions. for reasons of safety or for conducting The Governor of any State or terri- rescue operations shall inform the For- tory that contains National Forest est Supervisor within seven days after System lands may petition the Sec- the completion of the flight or the res- retary of Agriculture to promulgate cue operation as to the date, place, and regulations establishing management duration of flight, and the type and requirements for all or any portion of registration number of the aircraft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sawtooth National Forest – Roads Analysis
    Table of Contents Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 3 Roads Analysis Objective ............................................................................................................... 3 Project Area and Existing Transportation System .......................................................................... 5 Project Area ................................................................................................................................ 5 Existing Transportation System .................................................................................................. 5 Identifying Issues ............................................................................................................................ 7 Forest-wide Management Road Direction .................................................................................. 7 Management Area Description and Direction of the Road System ............................................ 9 Management Area 06- Upper South Fork Boise River ........................................................... 9 Management Area 07 – Little Smoky Creek ........................................................................ 13 Management Area 08 – Middle South Fork Boise River ..................................................... 16 Management Area 09 – Lime Creek ..................................................................................... 19 Management Area 10 – Soldier
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling-Utah-Rocky-Mountain-Tour-Race-Guide-2012
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN TOUR & RACE GUIDE Volume 5 Editor’s February, 2012 NOTES Publisher Seattle Publishing Jay Stilwell, President With the 2012 season well underway, the focus of some of the Ryan Price, Vice-President David Ward, CU Publisher nation’s best elite athletes is on the upcoming Olympics. Among Dave Iltis, CU Editor those that are still in the hunt for a ticket to London, many are from Associate Publisher / Editor the Rocky Mountain region. Boulder, Colo., could be well repre- Claire Bonin sented should track specialist Cari Higgins, mountain bikers Jeremy Assistant Editor Horgan-Kobelski and Heather Irmiger as well as road and track Darren Dencklau hopeful Taylor Phinney make the national team cut. Willow Rockwell Contributors (Durango), Georgia Gould (Fort Collins) and Katie Compton Claire Bonin Darren Dencklau (Colorado Springs) are also contenders for the available women’s Katie Hawkins mountain bike positions. Based on performances during the past sea- Dave Iltis son and so far this year, David Zabriskie from Salt Lake City, Utah, Art / Production could also find his way to London, representing the country in the Amy Beardemphl time trial event. Photography Bicycle Paper However, the vast majority of cyclists do not have such grandiose Mitchell Clinton Photography aspirations. For most, riding locally and discovering new routes and Dave Iltis/cyclingutah.com rides is what matters. In the fifth installment of the Rocky Mountain WheelsinFocus/Amara Edwards Tour and Race Guide you will find more than 1,245 rides and races, Sales Claire Bonin many you may be familiar with, but there is a fair amount of new Darren Dencklau events listed as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 San Juan National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2015 to 03/31/2015 San Juan National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Western Area Power - Special use management In Progress: Expected:03/2015 05/2015 Christopher Wehrli Administration Right-of-Way DEIS NOA in Federal Register 435-896-1053 Maintenance and 09/27/2013 [email protected] Reauthorization Project Est. FEIS NOA in Federal EIS Register 01/2015 Description: Update vegetation management activities along 278 miles of transmission lines located on NFS lands in Colorado, Nebraska, and Utah. These activities are intended to protect the transmission lines by managing for stable, low growth vegetation. Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Grand Valley Ranger District, Norwood Ranger District, Yampa Ranger District, Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Pine Ridge Ranger District, Sulphur Ranger District, East Zone/Dillon Ranger District, Paonia Ranger District, Boulder Ranger District, West Zone/Sopris Ranger District, Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Salida Ranger District, Gunnison Ranger District, Mancos/Dolores Ranger District. STATE - Colorado, Nebraska, Utah. COUNTY - Chaffee, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Larimer, Mesa, Montrose, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, Dawes, Daggett, Uintah. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Linear transmission lines located in Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska. R2 - Rocky Mountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Tri-State Montrose-Nucla- - Special use management In Progress: Expected:08/2015 04/2016 Liz Mauch Cahone Transmission Comment Period Public Notice 970-242-8211 Improvement Project 05/05/2014 [email protected] EA Est.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 103. NUMBER 5 NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES (With 21 Plates) BY CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany U. S. National Museum (Publication 3693) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 21, 1942 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 103. NUMBER 5 NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES (With 21 Plates) BY CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany U. S. National Museum (Publication 3693) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 21, 1942 BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction i Description of genera and species 2 Komaspidae Kobayashi 2 Chariocephalus Hall 4 Irvingella Ulrich and Resser 13 Parairvingella Kobayashi 25 Drumaspis, new genus 28 Unclassified genera 35 Cheilocephalns Berkey 35 Cholopilus Raymond 36 Caiyptonima, new genus 37 Illaenurus Hall 38 Platycolpus Raymond 40 Enontioura, new genus 42 Macclloura Resser 43 Arapahoia Miller 43 Plethomctopus Ulrich 47 Kingstonia VValcott 47 Byniunia Walcott 52 BynumicUa, new genus 57 Bynumina, new genus 58 Stenopilns Raymond 59 Blountia Walcott 60 Blountiella Resser 61 Ellipsocephaloides Kobayashi 62 MaryviUia Walcott 67 Meteoraspis Resser 72 Coosia Walcott 73 Coosella Lochman 75 Ptcroccphalina Resser 76 Burnetidae, new family 79 Burnetia Walcott 80 Iddingsia Walcott 85 Berkeia Resser 90 Unclassified genera 94 Elvinia Walcott 94 Taenicephalus Ulrich and Resser 99 Talbotina Lochman 107 Explanation of plates 109 Index 131 iii NEW UPPER CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES By CHARLES E. RESSER Curator, Division of Invertebrate Paleontology and Paleobotany, U. S. National Museum (With 21 Plates) INTRODUCTION Soon after 1878 when Dr. C. D. Walcott centered his main efforts on the study of the Cambrian system, he conceived the idea of a monograph series, each of which should contain descriptions of all Cambrian fossils representing a major animal group.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Adam Mountain (8,200 Acres)
    WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Adam Mountain (8,200 acres) ........................................................................................................ 3 Ashcroft (900 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 4 Assignation Ridge (13,300 acres) ................................................................................................... 4 Baldy Mountain (6,100 acres) ......................................................................................................... 6 Basalt Mountain A (13,900 acres) .................................................................................................. 6 Basalt Mountain (7,400 acres) ........................................................................................................ 7 Berry Creek (8,600 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Big Ridge to South Fork A (35,400 acres) and Big Ridge to South Fork B (6,000 acres) ............. 9 Black Lake East (800 acres) and Black Lake West (900 acres) ................................................... 11 Blair Mountain (500 acres) ........................................................................................................... 12 Boulder (1,300 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Budges (1,000 acres) ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-058 Methodist Mountain Comm Site Power Upgrades
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION Rocky Mountain Region, Western Area Power Administration Methodist Mountain Communication Site Power Upgrades Saguache County, Colorado Project Number: 2020-058 Expiration Date: December 31, 2020 A. Brief Description of Proposal: Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), Rocky Mountain Region (RMR), proposes to complete power upgrades at the Methodist Mountain (MMT) Communication Site. Following the Decker Fire, it was determined that the existing emergency generator for this site needs to be replaced. To facilitate this replacement, a landing will be constructed on the southwest side of the MMT Communication Site. This landing will be constructed using local borrow material from the area immediately surrounding WAPA’s communications building and propane tank. After the landing is constructed, the existing generator will be removed from the communications building and a new generator will be installed. Following completion of the generator replacement, the area will be restored as closely as possible to the original contours. The project area is rocky and largely unvegetated, so no reseeding or additional stabilization will be required. Equipment used for this project will include an excavator, skid-steer, and work trucks. Work will occur within WAPA’s right-of-way on public lands managed by the Rio Grande National Forest in Saguache County, Colorado. The existing access route to the site will be used and no new access routes will be constructed. B. Special Stipulations Pertaining to the Proposal: 1) If the scope of work of this project changes, RMR’s Environment Department must be contacted to determine whether additional environmental review is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public Comment, Appendix B
    Summary of Public Comment on Roadless Area Conservation Appendix B Requests for Inclusion or Exemption of Specific Areas Table B-1. Requested Inclusions Under the Proposed Rulemaking. Region 1 Northern NATIONAL FOREST OR AREA STATE GRASSLAND The state of Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Boise, ID - #6033.10200) Roadless areas in Idaho Multiple ID (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Inventoried and uninventoried roadless areas (including those Multiple ID, MT encompassed in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act) (Individual, Bemidji, MN - #7964.64351) Roadless areas in Montana Multiple MT (Individual, Olga, WA - #16638.10110) Pioneer Scenic Byway in southwest Montana Beaverhead MT (Individual, Butte, MT - #50515.64351) West Big Hole area Beaverhead MT (Individual, Minneapolis, MN - #2892.83000) Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, along the Selway River, and the Beaverhead-Deerlodge, MT Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, at Johnson lake, the Pioneer Bitterroot Mountains in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest and the Great Bear Wilderness (Individual, Missoula, MT - #16940.90200) CLEARWATER NATIONAL FOREST: NORTH FORK Bighorn, Clearwater, Idaho ID, MT, COUNTRY- Panhandle, Lolo WY MALLARD-LARKINS--1300 (also on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest)….encompasses most of the high country between the St. Joe and North Fork Clearwater Rivers….a low elevation section of the North Fork Clearwater….Logging sales (Lower Salmon and Dworshak Blowdown) …a potential wild and scenic river section of the North Fork... THE GREAT BURN--1301 (or Hoodoo also on the Lolo National Forest) … harbors the incomparable Kelly Creek and includes its confluence with Cayuse Creek. This area forms a major headwaters for the North Fork of the Clearwater. …Fish Lake… the Jap, Siam, Goose and Shell Creek drainages WEITAS CREEK--1306 (Bighorn-Weitas)…Weitas Creek…North Fork Clearwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]