Table of Contents Purpose and Need ...... 3 Roads Analysis Objective ...... 3 Project Area and Existing Transportation System ...... 5 Project Area ...... 5 Existing Transportation System ...... 5 Identifying Issues ...... 7 Forest-wide Management Road Direction ...... 7 Management Area Description and Direction of the Road System ...... 9 Management Area 06- Upper South Fork Boise River ...... 9 Management Area 07 – Little Smoky Creek ...... 13 Management Area 08 – Middle South Fork Boise River ...... 16 Management Area 09 – Lime Creek ...... 19 Management Area 10 – Soldier Creek/Willow Creek ...... 22 Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks ...... 26 Road Analysis Process ...... 26 STEP 1 - Road Risk/Cost Indicators ...... 27 STEP 2 - Road Value/Benefit Indicators ...... 28 STEP 3 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks ...... 29 STEP 4 - Road Risk/Value Matrix composite ...... 30 STEP 5 - Road Management Strategy ...... 30 Budgetary Needs of Maintaining the Minimum Road System ...... 32 Summary of Roads Analysis ...... 33 Appendix A – Ecological, Social, and Economic Considerations ...... 35 Appendix B – Composite of Benefits, Problems, and Risks Table ...... 40 Appendix C – Recommended Road Management Strategies Table ...... 49 Appendix D – Divisional Map Displaying Recommended Road Management Strategies ...... 68

2 | P a g e

Purpose and Need

In 2005, the Washington Office of the Forest Service directed all National Forests create a motor vehicle use map (MVUM) with the purpose of stopping uncontrolled cross-country motor vehicle use. This map was to adhere to the directions specified in Subpart B of the Forest Service Travel Management Rule (rule), regarding designation of roads, trails, and areas for motor vehicle use. The rule consists of two other Subparts: Subpart A, which covers the administration of the Forest transportation system, and Subpart C, which covers use by over- snow vehicles.

By the end of 2010, approximately 93 percent of the National Forest System Lands were covered by an MVUM1. These maps only followed directions specified in Subpart B, but in order to identify opportunities for the forest transportation system to meet current or future management objectives, based on ecological, social, cultural, and economic concerns, the National Forests also needed to adhere to the directions specified in Subpart A.

On November 10, 2010, the Washington Office directed the National Forests to complete Subpart A of the rule, which would require each unit to:  Identify the minimum road system needed for safe and efficient travel and for the protection, management, and use of NFS lands; and  Identify roads that are no longer needed to meet forest resource management objectives and therefore, scheduled for decommissioning or considered for other uses (36 CFR 212.5(b)).

With this direction given, the District Ranger for the Fairfield Ranger District has directed an interdisciplinary team to identify the minimum road system and unneeded roads using a travel analysis process that is dynamic, interdisciplinary, and integrated with all resource areas. The travel analysis process (TAP) will follow directives described in Forest Service Manual 7712 and Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 7709.55, Chapter 20, to complete the applicable sections of Subpart A.

This analysis includes all National Forest System roads, maintenance levels 1-5, on lands located within the Fairfield district on the Sawtooth NF. The analysis will not evaluate existing motorized trails or non-system roads but will consider their existence when performing the analysis.

Roads Analysis Objective

The objective of the roads analysis is to provide the line officer with critical information that is used to develop a road system that is safe and responsive to public needs and desires, adheres to the Sawtooth National Forest’s Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), meets

1 Cited in letter sent by Joel D. Holtrop, Deputy Chief, National Forest System, “Travel Management, Implementation of 36 CFR, Part 212, Subpart A (36 CFR 212.5(b)”, November 10, 2010 3 | P a g e current and future resource management objectives, reverses or minimizes negative ecological effects on the land, and allows for economical and efficient road management within likely budget levels.

To meet these objectives, as stated previously, Forest Service Manual (FSM) 7712 requires an interdisciplinary team conduct a science-based roads analysis process. A process meeting the requirements is described in the report Roads Analysis: Informing Decisions About Managing the National Forest Transportation System (USDA Forest Service, 1999, Misc. Report FS-643).

The interdisciplinary team conducting the science-based roads analysis consisted of the following:

Team Member Title / Specialty Shawn Robnett Forest’s Assistant Engineer / Engineering Steve Frost Fairfield RD Recreation Manager / Recreation Mark Dallon Fairfield RD Hydrologist / Hydrology Erika Phillips Fairfield RD Aquatics Biologist / Aquatics David Skinner Fairfield RD Wildlife Biologist / Wildlife John Pine Fairfield RD Forester / Timber Management John Shelley Fairfield RD Rangeland Mgmt. Specialist / Range & Weeds Devin Hulme Fairfield RD Fire Management Officer / Fire & Fuels Heidie Torrealday Forest’s Geologist / Minerals Dave Stockdale Forest GIS Specialist / Mapping

The science-based roads analysis provides a written document that contains the necessary information for the line officer to:

1. Identify transportation management opportunities and priorities. 2. Assess transportation management needs, long-term funding, and expected ecosystem, social, and economic effects. 3. Establish transportation management objectives and priorities.

The final result of the roads analysis is a written document with accompanying maps that document the information and analysis methods used to identify social and environmental opportunities, issues, risks, and priorities for future road management. The report, at a minimum, should contain the following:

1. Identification of needed and unneeded roads. 2. Identification of road-associated environmental and public safety risks. 3. Identification of site-specific priorities and opportunities for road improvements, decommissioning, and conversion to other uses. 4. Identification of areas of special sensitivity, unique resource values, or both. 5. Any other specific information that may be needed to support project-level decisions.

4 | P a g e

It should be noted here the information and final recommendations in this TAP represents the best available information at this time. This document is an analysis tool to be used for guiding future planning documents such as Environmental Analysis, Environmental Impact Statements or Categorical Exclusions. It is not intended to be a decision making document by itself.

Project Area and Existing Transportation System

Project Area

The Fairfield Ranger District is located in the southwest portion of the northern half of the Sawtooth National Forest. The District lies mostly within Camas County with a small portion of it in the western section of Elmore County. The District encompasses 420,720 acres of Forest system administered lands and contains 440 miles of inventoried trails, twelve campgrounds, over 680 miles of streams and more than 20 high mountain lakes.

Existing Transportation System

The existing road system on the Fairfield Ranger District consists of 369.78 miles of forest roads. A “Forest Road” is a road wholly or partly within or adjacent to and serving the National Forest System that the Forest Service determines is necessary for the protection, administration and utilization of the National Forest System and the use and development of its resources and is not a legally documented county, state or local public road. A forest road is sorted into three different function classes: arterial, collector, and local. These three functions are further defined as follows2:

Arterial: A NFS road that provides service to large land areas and usually connects with other arterial roads or public highways. These roads are generally maintenance level 4 or 5.

Collector: A NFS road that serves smaller areas than an arterial road and that usually connects arterial roads to local roads or terminal facilities. Provides service to smaller land areas than an arterial road. These roads are generally maintenance level 3, but can be level 2 or 4.

Local: A NFS road that connects a terminal facility with collector roads, arterial roads, or public highways and that usually serves a single purpose involving intermittent use. These roads are usually maintenance level 1 or 2.

Of these three function classes the roads are further broken down into five operational maintenance levels. An operational maintenance level is the maintenance level currently assigned to a road considering today's needs, road condition, budget constraints, and environmental concerns; in other words, it defines the level to which the road is currently being maintained. The definition of these operational maintenance levels are defined as follows.

2 Function classes are defined in FSM 7705 5 | P a g e

 Maintenance Level 1: Assigned to intermittent service roads during the time they are closed to vehicular traffic. The closure period must exceed 1 year. Basic custodial maintenance is performed to keep damage to adjacent resources to an acceptable level and to perpetuate the road to facilitate future management activities. Emphasis is normally given to maintaining drainage facilities and runoff patterns. Planned road deterioration may occur at this level. Roads receiving Level 1 maintenance may be of any type, class, or construction standard, and may be managed at any other maintenance level during the time they are open for traffic. However, while being maintained at level 1, they are closed to vehicular traffic, but may be open and suitable for non-motorized uses.  Maintenance Level 2: Assigned to roads open for use by high clearance vehicles. Passenger car traffic is not a consideration. Traffic is normally minor, usually consisting of one or a combination of administrative, permitted, dispersed recreation, or other specialized uses. Log hauling may occur at this level.  Maintenance Level 3: Assigned to roads open and maintained for travel by a prudent driver in a standard passenger car. User comfort and convenience are not considered priorities. Roads in this maintenance level are typically low speed, single lane with turnouts and spot surfacing. Some roads may be fully surfaced with either native or processed material.  Maintenance Level 4: Assigned to roads that provide a moderate degree of user comfort and convenience at moderate travel speeds. Most roads are double lane and aggregate surfaced. However, some roads may be single lane. Some roads may be paved and/or dust abated.  Maintenance Level 5: Assigned to roads that provide a high degree of user comfort and convenience. These roads are normally double lane, paved facilities. Some may be aggregate surfaced and dust abated.

The existing miles of forest roads3 managed by the Fairfield Ranger District are further broken down in Table 2 by their maintenance level.

Table 2 – Total Mileage of Forest System Roads per Maintenance Level Maint. Level Miles #1 39.10 #2 200.01 #3 107.94 #4 24.25 #5 0.00 Total Mileage - 371.30

The total mileage listed in Table 2 make up all the roads analyzed in this TAP.

3 Mileage obtained from the forest’s INFRA data base on March 11, 2013. 6 | P a g e

Identifying Issues

Forest-wide Management Road Direction

The desired road network on the Fairfield Ranger District strives to match the level of management activities occurring on the District and supplies the transportation system needed for recreation, special uses, timber harvest, range management, minerals development, and fire protection. The transportation network is managed, through the use of a variety of tools, to reduce degrading effects to resources. Roads needed for long-term objectives are maintained to provide for user safety and resource protection. Roads not needed for long-term objectives are identified to be decommissioned and stabilized.

The table below4 further lists management direction as it relates to roads and the overall management of the transportation system:

Management Direction for Roads Number Direction Description Type Provide and maintain a safe, efficient Forest transportation system that meets resource FRGO01 management and access needs, while mitigating degrading resource effects. Goals See also Goals for Wildlife Resources (02), Botanical Resources (06); Heritage Program (03), and Recreation Resources (01, 02, 04, 05). Analyze road system needs and associated resource effects in accordance with the FROB01 established agency policy direction for roads analysis. Cooperate with federal, state, and county agencies, tribal governments, and cost-share FROB02 partners to achieve consistency in road design, operation, and maintenance needed to attain Objectives resource goals. Identify safety hazards on Forest classified roads, establish improvement priorities, correct FROB03 or mitigate the hazard. During fine-scale analyses, identify opportunities to reduce road-related degrading effects to FROB04 help achieve other resource objectives. Coordinate transportation systems, management, and decommissioning with other federal, state and county agencies, tribal governments, permittees, contractors, cost-share FROB05 cooperators, and the public to develop a shared transportation system serving the needs of all parties to the extent possible. Identify roads and facilities that are not needed for land and resource management, and FROB06 evaluate for disposal or decommissioning. Objectives Inventory and assess existing classified road crossings in subwatersheds that are occupied or contain critical habitat for TEPC species. Prioritize inventories and assessments in subwatersheds outside designated and recommended wilderness and Inventoried Roadless FROB10 Areas (IRA); few if any classified road crossings exist in these areas. Assess crossings to determine if they provide for fish passage, 100 year flood flow, and bedload and debris transport. Incorporate the results into the biennial updates of the Watershed and Aquatic Recovery Strategy (WARS) database.

4 The table is an excerpt from the 2012 Sawtooth National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, pages III- 61 to III-64. 7 | P a g e

Management Direction for Roads Number Direction Description Type During fine-scale analyses in areas where roads and facilities are identified as a potential concern or problem contributing to degradation of water quality, aquatic species, wildlife FROB12 species of concern or occupied sensitive or Watch plant habitat, evaluate and document where the contributing facilities are and prioritize opportunities to mitigate effects. (Modified as part of 2012 Forest Plan amendment for WCS.) See also Objectives for TEPC Species (03, 07); SWRA Resources (12, 13, 14, 18); Wildlife Resources (05, 12); Non-native Plants (03, 04); Recreation Resources (01, 05, 07); Heritage Program (14); and Wilderness, Recommended Wilderness, and Inventoried Roadless Areas (03). In support of road management decisions, use an interdisciplinary science-based roads FRST03 analysis process such as Roads Analysis: Informing Decisions About Managing the National Forest Transportation System (USDA FS, 1999 Report FS-643). Roads shall be constructed to a standard appropriate to their intended use, considering FRST04 safety and concerns for resource degradation. Mitigate handling of road waste material (e.g., slough, rocks) to avoid or minimize delivery Standards FRST05 of waste material to streams that would result in degradation of soil, water, riparian and aquatic resources. See also Standards for TEPC Species (06, 11, 32); SWRA Resources (01, 02, 03, 04, 07, 08, 11, 12); Wildlife Resources (02, 03, 04, 05, 06); Botanical Resources (01, 04); Non-native Plants (03, 04, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10); Minerals and Geology (08); Recreation Resources (02, 03, 04); Scenic Environment (01); Heritage Program (01); and Wild and Scenic Rivers (01). To protect soil, water, and riparian resources, and their occupied habitat, water supply FRGU01 points, service areas, and other needs for road and facility construction projects should be specified in project planning and used in project implementation. In areas of existing extensive infestation, mitigation for noxious weed prevention should be FRGU02 incorporated into road layout, design, and project alternative evaluation. Prior to decommissioning roads, opportunities related to those roads for potential FRGU03 development or use as travel routes for ATVs, mountain bikes, or other alternative forms of transportation, should be considered. Roads that are not desired for public access or tribal uses, and that are no longer needed to FRGU04 manage the Forest or to provide access to inholdings should be considered for decomissioning and returning the lands that they occupy to desired resource management. Guidelines Where practical alternatives exist, roads in RCAs that are degrading riparian-dependent FRGU05 resources should be evaluated for obliteration or relocation. New roads and landings should be located out of RCAs wherever possible. When new roads FRGU06 or landings must be located in RCAs, they should be developed such that degrading effects to RCAs are mitigated. Annually prioritize roads to receive maintenance, repairs, or improvements to protect the investment, maintain the intended serviceability, and protect other resources. Road FRGU07 maintenance activities should be prioritized using factors such as user safety, resource protection needs, administrative needs, user comfort, the identified traffic service level, and available funding. Classified roads in intermittent use status should be evaluated for physical closure during FRGU08 periods of non-use and closed as appropriate.

8 | P a g e

Management Direction for Roads Number Direction Description Type Travel management should be used, as needed, to accomplish the following: a) Provide for the safety and welfare of the users. b) Protect threatened and endangered species and their habitat. c) Protect Forest resources, such as wildlife, soil, vegetation, and water. d) Provide a diversity of recreational experiences and reduce user conflicts. FRGU09 e) Protect road and trail investments. f) Comply with Forest contracts or permits, cooperative agreements, road purchase agreements, easement deeds, or other formal documents of the Government requiring that road use be controlled. g) Coordinate hunting and fishing opportunities with State agencies. When considering closure or decommissioning of roads for which an RS2477 assertion has FRGU10 been made by either a State or a County government, the merits of the assertion should be evaluated prior to taking any actions. Where opportunities to mitigate facilities and road management practices causing FRGU11 degradation have been identified, consider mitigating through measures such as relocation, closure, and changes in management strategy, alteration, or discontinuance. See also Guidelines for TEPC Species (13, 14); SWRA Resources (03, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 11, 12); Wildlife Resources (04, 05, 06, 08, 11, 12, 13); Botanical Resources (01, 02, 03); Non-native Plant (02, 03, 05); Mineral Resources (05, 06); Lands and Special Uses (03, 04, 05); Recreation Resources (05, 08, 09, 10, 12, 18, 19, 20); and Scenic Environment (07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16).

Management Area Description and Direction of the Road System

There are a total of five management areas that compose the Fairfield Ranger District. In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, there are further directions specifically developed for each management area. These specific descriptions and directions per each of the individual management areas are further explained below.

Management Area 06- Upper South Fork Boise River

Management Area Description

Management Prescriptions: Management Area 06 has the following management prescriptions (see map on next page for distribution of prescriptions).

Management Prescription Category (MPC) Percent of Mgt. Area 3.1 – Passive Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 30 3.2 – Active Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 24 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 41 5.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forested Landscapes 4 6.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland & Grassland Landscapes 1

9 | P a g e

!9 !9

!9

«¬75

Alturas Lake Creek Beaver Creek

Salmon River

Johnson Creek

Smiley Creek

3.1

!9

3.1 West Fork Big Smoky

3.2 !9

0 08

0 Big Smoky Creek 7 Smoky Mountains IRA 9

Willow Creek 3.2

South Fork Boise River 5.1 4.1c

Canyon !9 6.1 !9 Little Smoky Creek !9 !9 !9 !9 Bowns 2 2 7 227

Legend Management Prescription Categories 0 2 4 6 8 Miles 1.2 Recommended Wilderness 3.1 Passive Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial, and Hydrologic Resources !9 3.2 Active Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial, and Hydrologic Resources 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 4.2 Roaded Recreation 5.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forest Landscapes ¯ 6.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland and Grassland Landscapes Non-Forest System Lands Wild & Scenic River Classification The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Eligible Wild & Scenic Rivers: Recreation Classification data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) Using GIS products for purposes other than those intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results. !9 Map produced by: B.Geesey, Sawtooth NF, 09/2009

Management Area 06. Upper South Fork Boise River Location Map

10 | P a g e

General Location and Description - Management Area 6 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands within the upper South Fork Boise River and Big Smoky Creek drainages (see map, preceding page), which lie just south of the Sawtooth NRA. The management area is an estimated 139,900 acres, including several small private land inholdings that, together, make up about 1 percent of the area. These inholdings are primarily along the South Fork Boise River corridor. The area is surrounded by lands administered by the Sawtooth National Forest, including the Sawtooth Wilderness and National Recreation Area to the north. The primary uses and activities in this area have been mining, livestock grazing, and dispersed recreation.

Access - The main access to the area is from the south via Forest Road 094 from Fairfield, or from the west via Forest Road 227, along the South Fork Boise River from Featherville. Both of these roads are well maintained. Other roads in the area are generally dirt-surfaced, steep, and rough. The density of classified roads is estimated at 0.2 miles per square mile. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 0 and 1.2 miles per square mile. Roads are confined to the southern portion of the management area, and along the South Fork Boise River/Ross Fork corridor. An estimated 17.5 miles of existing roads have been closed to public motorized access during hunting season in the last two decades. Most closures were related to reducing big-game (primarily elk) vulnerability. This area has an extensive network of trails, many of which are open to both motorized and non-motorized use.

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION

In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, the following direction has been developed specifically for this area.

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description MPC 3.1 Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: Passive Restoration a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or and Maintenance of b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road Aquatic, Terrestrial, 0608 c) To address immediate response situations where, if the action is Standard and Hydrologic not taken, unacceptable impacts to hydrologic, aquatic, riparian or Resources terrestrial resources, or health and safety, would result.

Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: MPC 3.2 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Active Restoration b) To respond to statute or treaty, or and Maintenance of Road c) To support aquatic, terrestrial, and watershed restoration 0612 Aquatic, Terrestrial, Standard activities, or and Hydrologic d) To address immediate response situations where, if the action is Resources not taken, unacceptable impacts to hydrologic, aquatic, riparian or terrestrial resources, or health and safety, would result.

11 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description MPC 4.1c Management actions—including mechanical vegetation treatments, Undeveloped salvage harvest, wildland fire, prescribed fire, special use Recreation: authorizations, and road maintenance—must be designed and Maintain Unroaded implemented in a manner that would be consistent with the unroaded General Character with 0614 landscape in the temporary, short term, and long term. Exceptions to Standard Allowance for this standard are actions in the 4.1c roads standards, below. (Modified Restoration as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Activities

MPC 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: Road Character with 0615 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Standard Allowance for b) To respond to statute or treaty. Restoration Activities

Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, 0619 MPC 5.1 Standard water quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Restoration and d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Maintenance wildland-urban interface areas; or Emphasis within e) To meet access and travel management objectives. Forested Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to Landscapes implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Road be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads Guideline 0664 should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future

management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, 0622 MPC 6.1 Standard water quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Restoration and d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Maintenance wildland-urban interface areas; or Emphasis within e) To meet access and travel management objectives. Shrubland and Grassland Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Landscapes Road be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads Guideline 0666 should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future

management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Wildlife Coordinate seasonal road closures with Idaho Department of Fish and Objective 0638 Resources Game to reduce elk vulnerability and disturbance.

12 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Achieve or maintain the following ROS strategy:

ROS Class Percent of Mgt. Area Summer Winter Recreation Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized 33% 2% Resources Semi-Primitive Motorized 46% 98% Objective 0645 Roaded Natural 4% 0% Roaded Modified 17% 0%

The above numbers reflect current travel regulations. These numbers may change as a result of future travel regulation planning Provide opportunities for small salvage sales and personal use Timberland Objective 0648 fuelwood cutting of dead and down trees along existing roads where Resources vegetation and riparian condition outcomes are compatible. Evaluate and incorporate methods to help prevent weed establishment and spread from road management activities in the Skunk-Elk, Emma- Axolotl, and Skillern-Calf subwatersheds. Methods to consider include:  When decommissioning roads, treat weeds before roads are made impassable. Facilities and Objective 0656  Schedule road maintenance activities when weeds are least likely Roads to be viable or spread. Blade from least to most infested sites.  Consult or coordinate with the district noxious weed coordinator when scheduling road maintenance activities.  Periodically inspect road systems and rights of way.  Avoid accessing water for dust abatement through weed-infested sites, or utilize mitigation to minimize weed seed transport.

Management Area 07 – Little Smoky Creek

Management Area Description

Management Prescriptions: Management Area 07 has the following management prescriptions (see map on next page for distribution of prescriptions).

Management Prescription Category (MPC) Percent of Mgt. Area 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 40 4.2 – Roaded Recreation Emphasis 23 5.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forested Landscapes 37

General Location and Description - Management Area 7 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands within the Little Smoky Creek drainage northeast of Fairfield, Idaho (see map, preceding page). The management area is an estimated 55,500 acres, including several small private land inholdings that, together, make up about 2 percent of the area. The inholdings are mainly mining sites in the upper Carrie and Little Smoky Creek drainages. The primary uses

13 | P a g e

Big Smoky Creek Smoky Mountains IRA

!9 Canyon

227 !9 4.2 4.1c 227 Bowns

5.1 5.1

4.1c

227 Pine Creek 4.2 Blackhorse Creek IRA

Willow Creek 0 15 010 Five Points !9

Little Smoky Creek Buttercup Mountain IRA

Elk Ridge IRA Liberal Creek

4.1c 5.1

Basalt Creek 5.1 4.1c !9 Pioneer Soldier Mtn Ski Area

Liberal Mountain IRA 0 9 4 5 9 0

0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles

Legend Management Prescription Categories ¯ 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 4.2 Roaded Recreation 5.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forest Landscapes The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Non-Forest System Lands data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) Using GIS products for purposes other than those intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results. Map produced by: B.Geesey, Sawtooth NF, 09/2009

Management Area 07. Little Smoky Creek Location Map

14 | P a g e

and activities in this management area have been livestock grazing, dispersed motorized recreation, timber management, and mining.

Access - The main access to the area is from the south via Forest Road 094 from Fairfield, or from the west via Forest Road 227, along the South Fork Boise River and then up Little Smoky Creek and Carrie Creek. Forest Roads 227, 015, 095, and 094 are well maintained. The rest of the roads in the area are generally rough, winding, and native-surfaced. Most roads follow the bottoms of the major drainages in the area. An estimated 5 miles of existing road have been closed to public motorized access during hunting season over the past two decades. Most closures were related to reducing big game (primarily elk) vulnerability. The density of classified roads in the management area is an estimated 1.5 miles per square mile. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges from 1.3 to 2.2 miles per square mile. Most travel is by road, and relatively few trails exist.

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION

In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, the following direction has been developed specifically for this area.

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description MPC 4.1c Management actions—including mechanical vegetation treatments, salvage Undeveloped harvest, wildland fire, prescribed fire, special use authorizations, and road Recreation: maintenance—must be designed and implemented in a manner that would be General Maintain Unroaded 0701 consistent with the unroaded landscape in the temporary, short term, and long Standard Character with term. Exceptions to this standard are actions in the 4.1c roads standards, Allowance for below. (Modified as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Restoration Activities Within IRAs, road construction or reconstruction may only occur where Road needed: 0702 MPC 4.1c Standard a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Undeveloped b) To respond to statute or treaty. Recreation: Outside IRAs, road construction or reconstruction may only occur where Maintain Unroaded needed: Character with Road a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Allowance for 0703 Standard b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Restoration Activities c) To provide transportation systems that support accomplishment of Management Area Recreation Resource Opportunity Spectrum objectives. Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: MPC 5.1 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Restoration and b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Maintenance Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, water 0709 Emphasis within Guideline quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Forested Landscapes d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in wildland- urban interface areas; or e) To meet access and travel management objectives.

15 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description MPC 5.1 Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to implement Restoration and vegetation management projects. Effective closures should be provided in road Road Maintenance 0752 design. When the project is over, these roads should be reclaimed or Guideline Emphasis within decommissioned, if not needed to meet future management objectives. (Added Forested Landscapes as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Wildlife Coordinate seasonal road closures with Idaho Department of Fish and Game to Objective 0726 Resources reduce elk vulnerability and disturbance. Achieve or maintain the following ROS strategy:

Percent of Mgt. Area ROS Class Summer Winter Primitive 0% 0% Recreation Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized 0% 16% Resources Objective 0734 Semi-Primitive Motorized 35% 84%

Roaded Natural 39% 0% Roaded Modified 26% 0%

The above numbers reflect current travel regulations. These numbers may change as a result of future travel regulation planning Facilities and Reduce impacts of duplicate roads through re-location, reconstruction and Objective 0748 Roads obliteration. (Modified as part of the 2012 WCS amendment)

Management Area 08 – Middle South Fork Boise River

Management Area Description

Management Prescriptions: Management Area 08 has the following management prescriptions (see map on next page for distribution of prescriptions).

Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 68 4.2 – Roaded Recreation Emphasis 3 5.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland & Grassland Landscapes 29

General Location and Description - Management Area 8 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands within the South Fork Boise River drainage from Featherville east to the confluence with Little Smoky Creek (see map, preceding page). The management area is an estimated 111,000 acres, including small private land inholdings that make up less than 1 percent of the area. These inholdings are along the South Fork Boise River corridor. The area is bordered by lands administered by the Sawtooth and Boise National Forests. The primary uses and activities in this area have been dispersed and developed recreation, livestock grazing, and timber management.

Access - The main access to the area is from the south via Forest Road 094 from Fairfield, or from the west via Forest Road 227, along the South Fork Boise River from Featherville. Both of

16 | P a g e

Yuba River

Willow Creek

0

1

2

Smoky Mountains IRA

5.1 5.1

Marsh Creek 0 74 Canyon 4.1c !9 227 !9 Skeleton Creek 2 Bird 27 " !9 Creek Willow Creek Baumgartner !9 Chaparral !9 !9 !9 Bowns Abbot 1 B 6 4.2 6 1 Beaver Creek South Fork Boise River 5.1

Lime Creek IRA 4.1c Boardman Creek 0 10 !9

166

MiddleFork Lime Creek

!9

South Fork Lime Creek

0 2 4 6 8 Miles

Legend Management Prescription Categories 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 4.2 Roaded Recreation ¯ 5.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forest Landscapes Non-Forest System Lands Wild & Scenic River Classification The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Eligible Wild & Scenic Rivers: Recreation Classification data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Using GIS products for purposes other than those intended Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) may yield inaccurate or misleading results. Map produced by: B.Geesey, Sawtooth NF, 09/2009

Management Area 08. Middle South Fork Boise River Location Map

17 | P a g e these roads are well maintained. Other roads in the area are generally dirt-surfaced, steep, and rough. Motorized access restrictions have been established on some roads during hunting season to reduce elk vulnerability. The density of classified roads for the management area is an estimated 0.5 miles per square mile, and 68 percent of the area is inventoried as roadless. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 0.1 and 1.8 miles per square mile. A good network of trails exists in the roadless portion of the area.

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION

In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, the following direction has been developed specifically for this area.

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description MPC 4.1c Management actions—including mechanical vegetation treatments, Undeveloped salvage harvest, wildland fire, prescribed fire, special use Recreation: authorizations, and road maintenance—must be designed and Maintain Unroaded General implemented in a manner that would be consistent with the unroaded 0805 Character with Standard landscape in the temporary, short term, and long term. Exceptions to Allowance for this standard are actions in the 4.1c roads standards, below. (Modified Restoration as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Activities MPC 5.1 Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: Restoration and a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Maintenance Road 0806 b) To respond to statute or treaty. Emphasis within Standard Forested Landscapes Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road c) To achieve restoration objectives for forest vegetation, water 0812 Guideline quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or MPC 5.1 d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Restoration and wildland-urban interface areas; or Maintenance e) To meet access and travel management objectives. Emphasis within Forested Landscapes Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Road 0864 be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads Guideline should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Reduce impacts of roads through re-location, reconstruction and Vegetation Objective 0865 obliteration in low elevation pine habitats. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Wildlife Coordinate seasonal road closures with Idaho Department of Fish and Objective 0831 Resources Game to reduce elk vulnerability and disturbance.

18 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Achieve or maintain the following ROS strategy:

ROS Class Percent of Mgt. Area Summer Winter Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized 9% 9% Recreation Semi-Primitive Motorized 59% 90% Objective 0843 Resources Roaded Natural 17% 1% Roaded Modified 15% 0%

The above numbers reflect current travel regulations. These numbers may change as a result of future travel regulation planning Evaluate and incorporate methods to help prevent weed establishment and spread from road management activities in the Abbot-Shake, Willow Creek, Big Water-Virginia, and Houseman-Beaver subwatersheds. Methods to consider include:  When decommissioning roads, treat weeds before roads are made impassable.  Schedule blading or maintenance activities when weed seeds or Facilities and Objective 0858 propagules are least likely to be viable or spread. Blade from Roads least to most infested sites.  Consult or coordinate with the district noxious weed coordinator when scheduling road maintenance activities.  Periodically inspect road systems and rights of way.  When acquiring water for dust abatement, avoid accessing water through weed-infested sites, or utilize mitigation to minimize weed seed transport.

Management Area 09 – Lime Creek

Management Area Description

Management Prescription: Management Area 09 has the following management prescription.

Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 76 5.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forested Landscapes 12 6.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland & Grassland Landscapes 12

General Location and Description - Management Area 9 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands in the Lime Creek drainage in the southwest corner of the Fairfield Ranger District (see map, preceding page). The area lies in Camas and Elmore Counties, and is an estimated 52,700 acres, including several small private land inholdings that make up about 4 percent of the area, and a large block of state land that makes up about 12 percent of the area. These inholdings are located in the southern and eastern portions of the management area. The area is bordered by the Sawtooth National Forest to the north and northeast, the Boise National Forest to the west, and a mix of BLM, State, and private lands to the south and southeast. The

19 | P a g e

Beaver Creek

Boardman Creek

166

1 6 Middle Fork Lime Creek 6N 1

4.1c Lime Creek IRA 5.1

South Fork Lime Creek 4.1c 6.1

North Fork Lime Creek

West Fork Corral Creek

Thompson Creek Lime Creek

4 48 4.1c

0

0

7 5

5

0 9 06 6.1 007 181 0 55

Corral Creek

0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles

Legend Management Prescription Categories ¯ 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 5.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Forest Landscapes 6.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland and Grassland Landscapes The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Non-Forest System Lands data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Using GIS products for purposes other than those intended Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) may yield inaccurate or misleading results. Map produced by: B.Geesey, Sawtooth NF, 09/2009

Management Area 09. Lime Creek Location Map

20 | P a g e primary uses and activities in this management area are livestock grazing, dispersed motorized recreation, and timber management.

Access - The main access to the area from the south is by Forest Road 055 to the Hunter Creek Trailhead, or from the west via Boise Forest Road 166 to a number of logging roads in the North Fork drainage. Almost all of the roads in this area are rough and native-surfaced. Several roads have been closed to public motorized access during hunting season over the past two decades to reduce big game (primarily elk) vulnerability. The density of classified roads is an estimated 0.7 miles per square mile, with many of the roads concentrated in the upper North Fork and South Fork Lime Creek drainages. The remaining area is predominantly unroaded. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 0 and 1.3 miles per square mile. A good network of trails exists in the roadless portion of the area.

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION

In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, the following direction has been developed specifically for this area.

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Management actions—including mechanical vegetation treatments, salvage harvest, wildland fire, prescribed fire, special use MPC 4.1c authorizations, and road maintenance—must be designed and General Undeveloped 0901 implemented in a manner that would be consistent with the unroaded Standard Recreation: landscape in the temporary, short term, and long term. Exceptions to Maintain Unroaded this standard are actions in the 4.1c roads standards, below. (Modified Character with as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Allowance for Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: Restoration Road 0902 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Standard b) To respond to statute or treaty. Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, 0906 MPC 5.1 Guideline water quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Restoration and d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Maintenance wildland-urban interface areas; or Emphasis within e) To meet access and travel management objectives. Forested Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to Landscapes implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Road be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads 0948 Guideline should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment)

21 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, 0909 MPC 6.1 Guideline water quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Restoration and d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Maintenance wildland-urban interface areas; or Emphasis within e) To meet access and travel management objectives. Shrubland and Grassland Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to Landscapes implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Road be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads 0950 Guideline should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Wildlife Coordinate seasonal road closures with Idaho Department of Fish and Objective 0922 Resources Game to reduce elk vulnerability and disturbance. Achieve or maintain the following ROS strategy:

ROS Class Percent of Mgt. Area Summer Winter Semi-Primitive Motorized 79% 100% Recreation Objective 0931 Roaded Natural 4% 0% Resources Roaded Modified 17% 0%

The above numbers reflect current travel regulations. These numbers may change as a result of future travel regulation planning

Evaluate and incorporate methods to help prevent weed establishment and spread from road management activities in the South Fork Lime- Hearn subwatershed. Methods to consider include:  When decommissioning roads, treat weeds before roads are made impassable. Facilities and  Schedule road maintenance activities when weeds are least likely Objective 0945 Roads to be viable or spread. Blade from least to most infested sites.  Consult or coordinate with the district noxious weed coordinator when scheduling road maintenance activities.  Periodically inspect road systems and rights of way.  Avoid accessing water for dust abatement through weed-infested sites, or utilize mitigation to minimize weed seed transport.

Management Area 10 – Soldier Creek/Willow Creek

Management Area Description

Management Prescriptions: Management Area 10 has the following management prescriptions (see map on next page for distribution of prescriptions).

22 | P a g e

!9 !9 !9 !9 !9

!9

!9 Canyon !9 Baumgartner !9 !9 !9 !9 Bowns Buttercup Willow r 7 Mountain IRA 227 e Creek iv 2 So ise R 2 u th F ork Bo

Little Smoky Creek 01 Five Points 5 Lime Creek IRA !9 Deer Creek !9

4.2 Elk Ridge IRA 6.1 Soldier Mtn Pioneer 5 4.1c Ski Area 9 !9 0

Soldier Creek South Fork Lime Ck 6.1 6.1 4.1c Liberal Mountain IRA

Willow Creek

0 0 4

7 9 Corral Creek

6.1 0

Fairfield " ¤£20 ¤£20

Hill City Camas Creek 46 " «¬

0 2 4 6 8 10 Miles

Legend Management Prescription Categories 4.1c Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 4.2 Roaded Recreation ¯ 6.1 Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland and Grassland Landscapes Non-Forest System Lands The Forest Service uses the most current and complete Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Using GIS products for purposes other than those intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results. Map produced by: B.Geesey, Sawtooth NF, 09/2009

Management Area 10. Soldier Creek/Willow Creek Location Map

23 | P a g e

Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 80 4.2 – Roaded Recreation Emphasis 4 6.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland & Grassland Landscapes 16

General Location and Description - Management Area 10 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands within primarily the upper portions of the Soldier Creek and Willow Creek drainages north of Fairfield, Idaho (see map, preceding page). The area is an estimated 56,600 acres, including several private land inholdings that, together, make up about 8 percent of the area. The main inholdings are in the Soldier and Willow Creek corridors. The area is bordered by Sawtooth National Forest to the north, west, and east, and by a mix of private, BLM, and State lands to the south. The primary uses and activities in this area have been livestock grazing, winter recreation, dispersed motorized recreation, irrigation water, and mining.

Access - The main access to the area is from the south up Soldier Creek via Forest Road 094 from Fairfield, or from the south up Willow Creek via Forest Road 017. The density of classified roads in the management area is estimated at 0.5 miles per square mile. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 0 and 2.4 miles per square mile. Forest Roads 095 and 094, and portions of Roads 093 and 017 are well maintained. The rest of the roads in the area are generally rough, winding, and native-surfaced. Most roads follow the bottoms of the major drainages in the area. Most travel is by road, and there are relatively few trails.

MANAGEMENT DIRECTION

In addition to Forest-wide Goals, Objectives, Standards, and Guidelines that provide direction for all management areas, the following direction has been developed specifically for this area.

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Management actions—including mechanical vegetation treatments, MPC 4.1c salvage harvest, wildland fire, prescribed fire, special use authorizations, and road maintenance—must be designed and Undeveloped General 1001 implemented in a manner that would be consistent with the unroaded Recreation: Standard Maintain Unroaded landscape in the temporary, short term, and long term. Exceptions to Character with this standard are actions in the 4.1c roads standards, below. (Modified Allowance for as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Restoration Road construction or reconstruction may only occur where needed: Road Activities 1002 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Standard b) To respond to statute or treaty.

Road construction or reconstruction may occur where needed: MPC 6.1 a) To provide access related to reserved or outstanding rights, or Restoration and b) To respond to statute or treaty, or Maintenance Road c) To achieve restoration and maintenance objectives for vegetation, Emphasis within 1008 Guideline water quality, aquatic habitat, or terrestrial habitat; or Shrubland and Grassland d) To support management actions taken to reduce wildfire risks in Landscapes wildland-urban interface areas; or e) To meet access and travel management objectives.

24 | P a g e

Resource/Program Direction Number Management Direction Description Public motorized use should be restricted on new roads built to implement vegetation management projects. Effective closures should Road be provided in road design. When the project is over, these roads 1056 Guideline should be reclaimed or decommissioned, if not needed to meet future management objectives. (Added as part of the 2012 WCS amendment) Improve water quality by reducing accelerated sediment from existing Soil, Water, roads in the South Fork Soldier Creek, East Fork Willow Creek (mine Riparian, and Objective 1009 road), and the upper Owens Creek (old Couch Summit Road section) Aquatic Resources drainages. Achieve or maintain the following ROS strategy:

ROS Class Percent of Mgt. Area Summer Winter Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized 0% 12% Recreation Semi-Primitive Motorized 64% 84% Objective 1032 Resources Roaded Natural 23% 4% Roaded Modified 13% 0%

The above numbers reflect current travel regulations. These numbers may change as a result of future travel regulation planning Reduce road impacts through relocation, reconstruction, obliteration, Objective 1050 and conversion to trails in the Soldier and Willow Creek drainages. Evaluate and incorporate methods to help prevent weed establishment and spread from road management activities in the Upper Soldier Creek, Cherry-McKay, and Upper Willow Creek subwatersheds. Methods to be considered include:  When decommissioning roads, treat weeds before roads are made Facilities and impassable. Roads Objective 1051  Schedule road maintenance activities when weeds are least likely to be viable or spread. Blade from least to most infested sites.  Consult or coordinate with the district noxious weed coordinator when scheduling road maintenance activities.  Periodically inspect road systems and rights of way.  Avoid accessing water for dust abatement through weed-infested sites, or utilize mitigation to minimize weed seed transport.

25 | P a g e

Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks

Road Analysis Process

The purpose of the roads analysis is for determining the various benefits, problems, and risks of the roads within the project area and to determine how to provide a transportation system that is safe, affordable, reduces ecological impacts, and meets immediate and projected long-term public and resource management needs.

The assessment process is accomplished by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the line officer, who identifies the benefits, problems, and risks associated with the roads within the project area. The process is done in five steps which are described below:

 STEP 1 - Road Risk/Cost Indicators: This step gives ratings (High, Moderate, Low) to predetermined indicators associated with the specific road(s). These indicators include: Safety, Watershed and Aquatic, Terrestrial Wildlife Risks, Noxious Weeds, Maintenance Costs, and Authorized Road within an Inventoried Roadless Area. The specialists on the IDT look at the road segment in question and, when applicable, assign the appropriate road risk rating. For example, if the hydrologist/fish biologist determines the road being analyzed is within an Active, Moderate Restoration Priority Subwatershed, then they would assign an ‘M’ to the road for Moderate risk.

 STEP 2 - Road Value/Benefit Indicators: This step gives ratings (High, Moderate, Low) to predetermined values and benefits associated with the specific road(s). These indicators include access to: Recreation Facilities, Administrative Sites, Private Inholdings, Special-use Sites, Commodity Production Sites, Established Dispersed Recreation Sites, Fuel Management and Fire Protection Activities, General Use (hunting, driving for pleasure, gathering forest products, etc.), and Mineral and Energy Sites. Other two indicators ask if the road is considered an arterial or collector and if it has a current cost/share maintenance agreement on it. As in Step 1, the specialist looks at the road segment in question and, when applicable, assigns the appropriate road benefit rating. So for example, if the recreation specialist states the road provides access to recreation facilities then they would assign an ‘H’ to the road for High benefit.

 STEP 3 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks: This step contains questions which are used to assess the benefits, problems, and risks related to the current road system and the management of that system relative to the issues. This assessment is performed by answering a set of questions, which are found in Appendix A - Ecological, Social, and Economic Considerations which are used as a tool to help assess benefits, problems, and risks of each road. The answers to these questions may be considered when deciding what the recommended road strategy is for each road within the analysis.

 STEP 4 - Road Risk/Value Matrix composite: This step is comprised of using a matrix table to help with determining recommended management strategies based on the indicators recorded in the road risk (STEP 1) and road value (STEP 2) analyses. The maximum indicator recorded for each of the risk and value steps is matched with the

26 | P a g e

same indicator on the matrix table in order to determine which category the road falls within. For example, to determine the overall indicator of a certain road, if any one indicator for risk or value is a High then a High is used in the matrix table. The categories within the matrix table correlate with road management strategies found in STEP 5.

 STEP 5 - Road Management Strategy: This is the final step which is used to identify management opportunities, establish priorities, and formulate technical recommendations that are based on the issues and effects. The information from this final step and answers from the questions in STEP 3 are used as supporting information for making recommendations about the future characteristics of the road system.

STEP 1 - Road Risk/Cost Indicators

Indicators in this segment are intended to reflect safety and environmental risks or costs, economic costs, and social concerns. (H = high, M = moderate, L = Low). Risk/Cost indicators and associated ratings are displayed in the table below. The project rating given for each road within the table below is recorded in Appendix B - Composite of Benefits, Problems, and Risks Table.

Road Risk/Cost Indicators and Ratings Road Project Item Indicator Description Risk Rating No. Rating 1 Safety a Heavy traffic, numerous accidents, poor geometry H See b Moderate traffic, some accidents, fair geometry M Appendix B c Light traffic, few accidents, good geometry L

2 Watershed and Aquatic Indicators a Aquatic Conservation Strategy Priority Subwatershed H b Active, High Restoration Priority Subwatershed H See c Passive, High Restoration Priority Subwatershed H Appendix B d Active, Moderate Restoration Priority Subwatershed M e Passive, Moderate Restoration Priority Subwatershed M f Active, Low Restoration Priority Subwatershed L g Passive, Low Restoration Priority Subwatershed L

3 Terrestrial Wildlife Risks Indicators, TECPS species with road associated effects identified as negatively affecting habitat or populations including: gray wolf, Townsend’s big-eared bat, spotted bat, wolverine, common loon, bald eagle, northern See goshawk, peregrine falcon, flammulated owl, and spotted Appendix B frog, sage grouse. (Road density is based on 6th HUC level.) a High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density H (>1.7 mi./sq. mile) b Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road H density (>1.7 mi./sq. mile)

27 | P a g e

Road Project Item Indicator Description Risk Rating No. Rating c High abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road M density (0.7 to 1.7 mi./sq. mile) d Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate M road density (0.7 to 1.7 mi./sq. mile) e Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density M (>1.7 mi./sq. mile) f High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density L (<0.7 mi./sq. mile) g Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road L density (<0.7 mi./sq. mile) h Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road L density (0.7 to 1.7 mi./sq. mile), or low road density (<0.7 mi./sq. mile)

4 Noxious Weeds See a Roads within an area of known presence H Appendix B b Roads within areas of known susceptibility H

5 Maintenance Costs a Annual and/or deferred maintenance costs per mile exceed 150 H percent of the average cost per mile of that maintenance class and See surface type. Appendix B b Annual and/or deferred maintenance costs exceed 125 percent of the M average cost per mile of that maintenance class and surface type.

See 6 Authorized Road within an Inventoried Roadless Area M Appendix B

Arriving at a composite risk/cost value: Any of the above indicators with an H rating will result in a High composite risk rating; Any individual Moderate rating without an accompanying High indicator will rate a composite of Moderate; A lack of any of the above indicators or the occurrence of only a Low rating will result in a composite Low rating.

Step 1 Result: Project Road risk/cost Rating: HIGH / MODERATE / LOW

STEP 2 - Road Value/Benefit Indicators

Indicators in this segment are intended to identify the social, resource management, and recreational values linked to the roads function along with the value of each indicator. The description of each value along with its corresponding rating is displayed in the table below. The value rating given derived from the table below for each road being analyzed in the analysis is recorded in Appendix B - Composite of Benefits, Problems, and Risks.

28 | P a g e

Road Value/Benefit Indicators and Ratings Project Indicator Value Rating (check Description No. Rating those that apply) 1 Provides access to recreation facilities (developed sites or H trailheads) 2 Provides access to administrative sites H 3 Provides access to private inholdings, communities, or represents H a legal right-of-way 4 Provides access to special-use sites/developments or capital H investment improvements 5 Provides access to commodity production (timber cutting areas) H 6 Provides access to range allotments and watering sites H See 7 Provides access to established dispersed recreation sites M Appendix B 8 Provides access for fuels management or fire protection activities H in urban interface areas 9 Provides access for general use such as hunting, general L dispersed recreation, driving for pleasure, gathering forest products, etc. 10 Provides access to active mineral or energy production sites H 11 Road has a current cost/share maintenance agreement H 12 The road is a recognized arterial or collector road H Composite rating: Any High rating of a single indicator will result in a High composite value; A rating of no higher than Moderate in any indicator will result in a Moderate composite; A rating no higher than Low or if none of the above indicators are present will result in a Low composite rating.

Step 2 Result: Project Road Value/Benefit Rating: HIGH / MODERATE / LOW

STEP 3 - Assessing Benefits, Problems, and Risks

The main purpose of this step is to assess the various benefits, problems, and risks of the road. Benefits are the potential uses and socioeconomic gains provided by roads and related access. Problems are conditions for certain environmental, social, and economic attributes that managers deem to be unacceptable. Risks are likely future losses in environmental, social, and economic attributes if the road system remains unchanged.

Appendix A contains a series of questions which help with determining the various benefits, problems, and risks for each road or roads under consideration. These questions should be used as a checklist to determine if there are any additional possible benefits, problems, and risks not specifically indicated in STEPS 1 and 2. Answering all of the questions will usually not be necessary.

These questions are not intended to be prescriptive, but they are available to assist interdisciplinary teams in developing questions and approaches appropriate to each analysis area. Which questions are appropriate for a particular analysis area and which warrant deep or cursory treatment will depend on the particular area and the issue being addressed.

29 | P a g e

STEP 4 - Road Risk/Value Matrix composite

The following matrix represents the composite matrix of potential combinations of road risk and value and is used to determine appropriate management strategies when evaluating roads during watershed and transportation system analysis. It addresses maintenance and investment priorities and will assist in determining the minimum transportation network for local functional class roads. The matrix of composite values and related direction is intended as a management guide subject to variability according to individual factor ratings and other site specific conditions. Outcomes of the Road Risk/Value matrix are displayed in the table below.

Road Risk/Value Matrix Table

RISK / COST Low Moderate High

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 High H Value H Value H Value L Risk M Risk H Risk

Category 4 Category 5 Category 6 VALUE/ Moderate M Value M Value M Value BENEFIT L Risk M Risk H Risk

Category 7 Category 8 Category 9 Low L Value L Value L Value L Risk M Risk H Risk

Note: The numerical values in the matrix are solely matrix placement values for relating to the discussion below and do not reflect a scoring value.

STEP 5 - Road Management Strategy

The categories listed in the matrix of STEP 4 are represented in the Table 3 below. These categories, numbered 1 through 9 contain recommended road management strategies which can be used in making a final recommendation for any road being analyzed.

Table 3 – Recommended Road Strategies per Category Category Recommendation Desirable Steady State Condition These roads represent a desirable condition as the values heavily outweigh resource risks. Generally, the objective would be to maintain to standard unless it is shown 1 that a lower maintenance level would not diminish its current high road related values. These roads represent a desirable condition as the values moderately outweigh resource risks. Generally, the objective would be to maintain to standard unless it is 2 shown that a lower maintenance level would not diminish its current high road related values.

30 | P a g e

Category Recommendation Priorities for Capital Improvements and Recurrent Maintenance These roads may rank fairly high for priority for investment to protect resource concerns by upgrading or taking care of deferred maintenance needs that may be contributing to potential resource risks. The focus on these roads should be the 3 resources at risk and how road management can mitigate these potential risks. These roads may also be candidates for relocation or reconstruction investments. These roads would generally be a high priority for continued recurring maintenance.

Priorities for Reducing Maintenance Levels and Budget Costs These roads should be considered for lowering maintenance levels to achieve cost 4 savings if the moderate road related value is not expected to be impaired with such changes. These roads should have a considerable variance in the objective depending upon the specific matrix factors that rated risk and value of note. Those roads with the high risk rating should be carefully assessed relative to the resource value to determine what changes, if any, would reduce the risks. Other factors such as MPC category and issues identified will be helpful in determining management strategies for these 5 roads.

Utilizing the above matrix in a roads analysis process at a sub-forest scale should help to identify ways to more efficiently spend the limited road maintenance dollars allocated to the forests. Determinations should be made with involvement of engineers with experience and training in highway maintenance and safety. These roads should have a considerable variance in the objective depending upon the specific matrix factors that rated risk and value of note. Those roads with the high risk rating should be carefully assessed relative to the resource value to determine what changes, if any, would reduce the risks. Other factors such as MPC category and issues identified will be helpful in determining management strategies for these 6 roads.

Utilizing the above matrix in a roads analysis process at a sub-forest scale should help to identify ways to more efficiently spend the limited road maintenance dollars allocated to the forests. Determinations should be made with involvement of engineers with experience and training in highway maintenance and safety. Potential Priorities for Decommissioning These roads similarly should be considered for decommissioning but also could achieve cost benefit savings by reducing maintenance level since it is unlikely other 7 resource values would be placed at risk. These roads should be considered for placing in level 1 operational maintenance class. The focus on these roads would be economic efficiency and evaluation of the need. These roads should be considered for decommissioning or changing management to alleviate risk (place at level 1). The resource risk may outweigh the low value 8 indicated for the road. These roads should be priority candidates for decommissioning or reducing maintenance levels and costs.

31 | P a g e

Category Recommendation These roads should be considered for decommissioning or changing management to alleviate risk (place at level 1). The resource risk may outweigh the low value 9 indicated for the road. These roads should be priority candidates for decommissioning or reducing maintenance levels and costs.

For this report, the road management strategies being considered for recommendation include the following: 1) the road is to remain at the same operational maintenance level; 2) the road’s operational maintenance level is to change; 3) the road is to be decommissioned; or 4) the road is to be converted to a trail.

The final recommended road management strategies for the roads being analyzed are listed in Appendix C - Recommended Road Management Strategy Table.

Budgetary Needs of Maintaining the Minimum Road System

The purpose of calculating the annual cost to maintain the forest road system on the Fairfield Ranger District is to determine if current road maintenance funding is sufficient to keep the roads at their current maintenance standards. This analysis did not take into account the deferred maintenance costs needed for the road system since other funding sources (such as Capital Improvement Program funding) are typically sought to cover these more expensive needs. Also, to be as consistent as possible when analyzing current funding needs versus funding available, all road segments are assumed to currently be at an acceptable maintenance standard.

Table 4 shows the final minimum road system derived from this analysis report. It also calculates the approximate annual maintenance budgetary needs to maintain these roads to the proposed operational maintenance levels.

Table 4 – Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost on the Recommended Road System for the Fairfield Ranger District Total Road System Total Total Maintained Road Maintenance Annual Annual Cost Total Recommended by System Cycle Per Road per Annual Maintenance Road System Counties District Maint. System Maintenance Budget Level on District and Others Maintains Level Maintained Level5 Needed Miles Miles Miles Years Miles/Year Cost/Mile Total Cost6 M.L. 5 0 0 0 3 0 $1,100 $0 M.L. 4 24.25 13.48 10.77 1 10.77 $800 $8,616 M.L. 3 92.16 66.88 25.28 1 25.28 $750 $18,960 M.L. 2 212.34 9.19 203.15 5 40.63 $300 $12,189 M.L. 1 32.21 3.90 28.31 5 5.66 $100 $566 Totals - 360.96 93.45 267.51 --- 82.34 --- $40,331

5 Costing is an average of the total costs found in INFRA for routine annual road maintenance. 6 Total costs are rounded to the nearest hundredths. 32 | P a g e

The forest currently receives an annual CMRD budget of around $630,000 of which approximately $300,000 is set aside for conducting annual road maintenance on the entire forest. The forest receives $24,000 of CWFS funds which is mainly used on spot surfacing gravel roads and/or patching asphalt on roads that are paved. In addition approximately $30,000 is used to maintain high clearance roads.

These three funding sources add up to $354,000, which is the approximate total amount currently used for conducting annual road maintenance on the entire forest. Of that amount, approximately sixty percent7 ($212,000) is used to cover the cost to maintain the roads on the Fairfield and Ketchum Ranger Districts and the Sawtooth NRA. Of the $212,000, approximately $53,000 is available for funding the maintenance of the roads on the Fairfield Ranger District. This amount is approximately 30 percent more than what is currently estimated in the needed amount shown in Table 4.

Summary of Roads Analysis

The ID Team evaluated a total of 184 segmented routes on the Fairfield Ranger District which totaled 371.30 miles. This total is further broken down per maintenance levels shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Current Transportation System Evaluated Under the Analysis Number of Routes Evaluated ML 1 ML 2 ML 3 ML 4 ML 5 Total (each) (miles) (miles) (miles) (miles) (miles) (miles) 184 39.10 200.01 107.94 24.25 0 371.30

The ID Team considered the various concerns and uses associated with each road segment on the district. These discussions assessed the benefits and risks associated with the current transportation system. The routes associated with the miles depicted in Table 5 were ranked by risk and benefit indicators along with answering screening questions (see Appendix A) pertinent to each road segment.

The risk and benefit rankings for each road segment is summarized in Appendix B. Based on the compilation of these rankings and answers to pertinent screening questions a final recommendation was made on each road in order to determine what the final minimum road system should be at this time of writing. The final summary of the recommendation given for each specific road segment can be viewed in Appendix C and is displayed on the map contained in Appendix D.

In conclusion, a summary of changes in road maintenance levels from the current condition to the recommended minimum road system for the entire Fairfield Ranger District is presented in Table 6. This table reflects an approximate 2.8% reduction in the current system miles of roads within the district.

7 The percentage is derived from the 2015 Road Maintenance Plan where the total number of planned road maintenance miles for Ketchum, SNRA, and Fairfield is divided by the total forest planned road maintenance miles. 33 | P a g e

Possible areas where the road system could further be reduced would be to continue to analyze the maintenance level 1 roads. A majority of level 1 roads were built to access timber sales and may not be needed in the near future if there are no sales planned for several years out. If future access to timber is identified as the only high benefit and that benefit will not be realized many years in the future, then the road could be recommended for removal off the system if no other high benefits exist.

Even without the possible changes just mentioned, it is concluded this minimum recommended road system is safe, affordable, reduces ecological impacts, and meets immediate and projected long-term public and resource management needs.

Table 6 – Final Recommended Transportation System Based on the Analysis

Miles of System Roads Analyzed Maintenance Level 5 0 Maintenance Level 4 24.25 Maintenance Level 3 92.16 Maintenance Level 2 212.34 Maintenance Level 1 32.21 Total Recommended Road System - 360.96 Decommission from System 4.04 Decommission & Convert to Trail 6.30 Total Recommended Road System Removal - 10.34 Total Miles - 371.30

34 | P a g e

Appendix A – Ecological, Social, and Economic Considerations

Ecosystem Functions and Processes

1. What ecological attributes, particularly those unique to the region, would be affected by roading of currently unroaded areas? 2. To what degree do the presence, type, and location of roads increase the introduction and spread of exotic plant and animal species, insects, diseases, and parasites? What are the potential effects of such introductions to plant and animal species and ecosystem function in the area? 3. To what degree does the presence, type, and location of roads contribute to the control of insects, diseases, and parasites? 4. How does the road system affect ecological disturbance in the area? 5. What are the adverse effects of noise caused by developing, using and maintaining roads?

Aquatic, Riparian Zone, and Water Quality

1. How and where does the road system modify the surface and subsurface hydrology of the area? 2. Is the road within 300 feet of a stream (intermittent and perennial)? 3. How and where does the road system generate surface erosion? Does the road have high potential to deliver sediment to the stream? 4. How and where does the road system affect mass wasting? 5. How and where do road-stream crossings influence local stream channels and water quality? 6. How and where does the road system create potential for pollutants, such as chemical spills, oils, de-icing salts, or herbicides, to enter surface waters? 7. How and where is the road system “hydrologically connected” to the stream system? How do the connections affect water quality and quantity (such as, delivery of sediments, chemicals, thermal increases, elevated peak flows)? 8. What downstream beneficial uses of water exist in the area? What changes in uses and demand are expected over time? How are they affected or put at risk by road-derived pollutants? 9. How and where does the road system affect wetlands? 10. How does the road system alter physical channel dynamics, including isolation of floodplains; constraints on channel migration; and the movement of large wood, fine organic matter, and sediment? 11. How and where does the road system restrict the migration and movement of aquatic organisms? What aquatic species are affected and to what extent? 12. How does the road system affect shading, litter fall, and riparian plant communities? 13. How and where does the road system contribute to fishing, poaching, or direct habitat loss for at-risk aquatic species? 14. How and where does the road system facilitate the introduction of non-native aquatic species?

35 | P a g e

15. To what extent does the road system overlap with areas of exceptionally high aquatic diversity or productivity, or areas containing rare or unique aquatic species or species of interest?

Terrestrial Wildlife

1. What are the direct effects of the road system on terrestrial species habitat? 2. How does the road system facilitate human activities that affect habitat? 3. How does the road system affect legal and illegal human activities (including trapping, hunting, poaching, harassment, road kill, or illegal kill levels)? What are the effects on wildlife species? 4. How does the road system directly affect unique communities or special features in the area?

Weed Management

1. Does the road access a meadow or scab rock flat? 2. Does the road affect sensitive plant populations? 3. Does the road increase the spread of noxious weeds?

Economics

1. How does the road system affect the Agency’s direct cost and direct revenues used in assessing financial efficiency? 2. How does the road system affect the priced and non-priced consequences included in economic efficiency analysis used to assess net benefits to society?

3. How does the road system affect the distribution of benefits and costs among affected people?

Timber Management

1. Does the road access forest vegetation needing treatment now or in the future? 2. How does the road system affect managing the suitable timber base and other lands? 3. How does the road system affect access to timber stands needing silvicultural treatment?

Minerals Management

1. How does the road system affect access to locatable, leasable, and salable minerals?

Range Management

1. Does the road access essential range improvements? 2. Is the road essential to proper grazing management? 3. How does the road system affect access to range allotments?

Water Production 36 | P a g e

1. How does the road system affect access, constructing, maintaining, monitoring, and operating water diversions, impoundments, and distribution canals or pipes? 2. How does road development and use affect water quality in municipal watersheds? 3. How does the road system affect access to hydroelectric power generation?

Special Forest Products

1. How does the road system affect access for collecting forest products?

Special Uses Permits

1. How does the road system affect managing special-use permit sites (concessionaires, communications sites, utility corridors, and so on)?

General Public Transportation

1. How does the road system connect to public road and provide primary access to communities? 2. How does the road system connect large blocks of land in other ownership to public roads? (ad-hoc communities, subdivisions, in holdings, and so on) 3. How does the road system affect managing roads with shared ownership or with limited jurisdiction? (RS2477, cost-share, prescriptive rights, FLPMA easements, FRTA easements, DOT easements)? 4. How does the road system address the safety of road users?

Administrative Use

1. How does the road system affect access needed for research, inventory, and monitoring? 2. How does the road system affect investigative or enforcement activities?

Protection

1. How does the road system affect fuels management? 2. How does the road system affect risk to fire fighters and to public safety? 3. How does the road system affect the capacity of the Forest Service and cooperators to suppress wildfires? 4. How does the road system contribute to airborne dust emissions resulting in reduced visibility and human health concerns?

Unroaded Recreation

1. Is there now or will there be in the future excess supply or excess demand for unroaded recreation opportunities?

37 | P a g e

Roaded Recreation

1. Does the road provide the only access to developed recreation sites? 2. Does the road provide the only access to established dispersed recreation sites? 3. Does the road provide the only access to forest-based recreation activities such as hunting, fishing, birding, etc? 4. Is there now or will there be in the future excess supply or excess demand for roaded recreation opportunities? 5. Is developing new roads into unroaded areas, decommissioning of existing roads, or changing maintenance of existing roads causing substantial changes in the quantity, quality, or type of roaded recreation opportunities? 6. What are the adverse effects of noise and other disturbances caused by constructing, using, and maintaining roads on the quantity, quality, or type of roaded recreation opportunities? 7. Who participates in roaded recreation in the areas affected by road constructing, changes in road maintenance, or road decommissioning?

Passive-Use Value

1. Do areas planned for road construction, closure, or decommissioning have unique physical or biological characteristics, such as unique natural features and threatened or endangered species? 2. Do areas planned for road construction, closure, or decommissioning have unique cultural, traditional, symbolic, sacred, spiritual, or religious significance? 3. What, if any, groups of people (ethnic groups, subcultures, and so on) hold cultural, symbolic, spiritual, traditional, or religious values for areas planned for road entry or road closure? 4. Will road construction, closure, or decommissioning significantly affect passive-use value?

Social Issues

1. What are people’s perceived needs and values for roads? How does road management affect people’s dependence on, need for, and desire for roads? 2. What are people’s perceived needs and values for access? How does road management affect people’s dependence on, need for, and desire for access? 3. How does the road system affect access to paleontological, archaeological, and historic sites? 4. How does the road system affect cultural and traditional uses (such as plant gathering, and access to traditional and cultural sites) and American Indian treaty rights? 5. How are roads that constitute historic sites affected by road management? 6. How is community social and economic health affected by road management (for example, lifestyles, businesses, tourism industry, infrastructure maintenance)? 7. How does road management affect wilderness attributes, including natural integrity, natural appearance, opportunities for solitude, and opportunities for primitive recreation? 8. What are the traditional uses of animals and plant species within the area of analysis?

38 | P a g e

Civil Rights and Environmental Justice

How does the road system, or its management, affect certain groups of people (minority, ethnic, cultural, racial, disabled, and low income groups)?

39 | P a g e

Appendix B – Composite of Benefits, Problems, and Risks Table

Fairfield Ranger District

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments INT FOR BDRY/B NF Trail 155/SEC 7214/SEC Recreation: Trail bridge access to Abbot CG; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or 155A ABBOT GULCH 15 11 0.00 1.59 1.59 FS FS 2 M L L H H H H M H L source habitat and low road density (flam. Owl & white-headed v.p. habitat, low road density) INT FOR BDRY/16 6B1 / SEC Eng: Changed from ML 3 to ML 2. 166B1 LOG CHUTE GULCH 30 SEC 18 0.00 4.22 4.22 FS FS 3 L M L H H H M H L Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density 166B1 166B1/SE Range: Road not needed; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high A LOG CHUTE GULCH SPUR A C 14 SEC 14 0.00 1.25 1.25 FS FS 2 L M H H M L road density ; Engineering: Road no longer needed for timber extraction. 166B1 166B1/SE Range: Road not needed; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high B LOG CHUTE GULCH SPUR B C 13 SEC 13 0.00 1.42 1.42 FS FS 2 L M H H H M H L road density; Timber: Road still needed for timber extraction. 166B3 GATE/SE 166D/SEC Recreation: Trails access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high 166B3 SPUR 166B3 C 30 20 0.00 3.57 3.57 FS FS 2 L M H H H H H M H L road density BNF- 166D/SEC 29/FORES Recreation: Trail access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 166D SPUR 166D T BDRY SEC 16 0.00 3.90 3.90 FS FS 2 L L H H H H H M H L moderate road density or low road density 166D/SEC 29/ FOREST Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low 166D4 SPUR 166D4 BDRY SEC 28 0.00 2.84 2.84 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M H L road density 166D/SEC Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low 166D5 SPUR 166D5 21 SEC 17 0.00 2.02 2.02 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M H L road density BNF- Recreation: Trails access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 166N SPUR 166N 166/SEC 5 SEC 4 0.00 1.14 1.14 FS FS 2 L L L H H H H M L moderate road density or low road density BNF- Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low 166N SPUR 166N 166/SEC 5 SEC 4 1.14 2.40 1.26 FS FS 1 L L L H H M road density Recreation: Seasonally closed-HUNTING SEASON high activity rec use, trails access; 166N/SEC Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density mitigated 166N1 SPUR 166N1 4 SEC 10 0.00 6.93 6.93 FS FS 2 L H H H H H H M L seasonal time (closed hunting season) Recreation: POSSIBLE DISPERSED CAMPING AT END OF ROAD 166N1/SE Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density. Not closed 166N2 SPUR 166N2 C 21 SEC 4 0.00 0.34 0.34 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L seasonally. BNF- 166O SPUR 166O 166/SEC 8 SEC 9 0.00 1.31 1.31 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density

40 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments 166O/SEC 166O2 SPUR 166O2 8 SEC 9 0.00 0.54 0.54 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density BNF- Eng: NO BENEFITS – DECOMISSION BNF- 166/SEC Range: Road not needed; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high 166P SPUR 166P 166/SEC 8 17 0.00 0.34 0.34 FS FS 1 L M M H road density BNF - 166/SEC 166R SPUR 166R 17 SEC 17 0.00 1.37 1.37 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density 166R/SEC Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; Access to 166R1 SPUR 166R1 17 SEC 21 0.00 2.92 2.92 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L goshawk west 166R1/SE 166R2 SPUR 166R2 C 20 SEC 22 0.00 1.12 1.12 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; Seasonal road 166T SPUR 166T 166 SEC 32 0.00 0.84 0.84 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L closure Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density Seasonal road 166T SPUR 166T 166 SEC 32 0.84 1.28 0.44 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L closure BNF - 166/SEC Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; Seasonal road 166T1 SPUR 166T1 29 SEC 29 0.00 1.35 1.35 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L closure 166T/SEC Range: Road not needed; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high 166T2 SPUR 166T2 29 SEC 29 0.00 0.25 0.25 FS FS 1 L M M H road density; year round road closure Forest Spur is seasonally closed- spring; Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Low abundance of 181 SNF 181 Bdry. 70055 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 2 L L L H H M L potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density Range: Road not needed; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low 70001 BARKER GULCH 70227 CREEK 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L road density (needs cleaned up on map-closed past Kelly H?). SEASONAL GATE ON WHOLE SYSTEM; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70003 WARBOIS 70074 SEC 1 0.00 4.80 4.80 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L source habitat and low road density, seasonally closed, elk winter & calving habitat. Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, seasonally 70003A WARBOIS 70003 SEC 6 0.00 1.00 1.00 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L closed, elk winter & calving habitat. Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, seasonally 70003B WARBOIS 70003 SEC 36 0.00 0.80 0.80 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L closed, elk winter & calving habitat. Recreation: ADMIN Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70004 SHAKE CR R S 70227 70227 0.00 0.09 0.09 FS FS 3 L L L H H H low road density Recreation: ADMIN Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70004A SHAKE CR GS SPUR A 70004 70227 0.00 0.15 0.15 FS FS 3 L L L H H H H low road density Recreation: ADMIN Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70004B SHAKE CR GS SPUR B 70004A SEC 8 0.00 0.04 0.04 FS FS 3 L L L H H H H low road density Timber: ACTIVE PLAN OF OPERATION – EAST SIDE SHAKE CREEK, ROAD USE BEYOND GATE AUTHORIZED UNDER PLANT Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: SEC 4 / Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Road 70005 SHAKE CR 70227 Trailhead 0.00 0.80 0.80 FS FS 3 M M M H H H H M H L H in RCA; Multiple stream crossings; sedimentation occurring C G / Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70006 WILLOW CR C G 70008 70008 0.00 0.30 0.30 FS FS 2 L H M H moderate road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 0.00 5.00 5.00 CO CO 3 M L L H H H H M H L H low road density

41 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 5.00 7.10 2.10 CO FS 2 L L L H H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 7.10 8.00 0.90 ST FS 2 L L L H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 8.00 9.10 1.10 FS FS 2 L M L H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 9.10 10.70 1.60 PVT FS 2 L M L H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 10.70 11.70 1.00 FS FS 2 L M L H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 11.70 12.50 0.80 PVT FS 2 L M L H H H M L low road density CO. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 12.50 12.70 0.20 FS FS 2 L M L H H H M L low road density Recreation: Trail Access , Trail Head , Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of 70008 WILLOW CREEK WEST 70227 SEC. 3 0.00 1.50 1.50 FS FS 3 M H M H H H H M L potential or source habitat and moderate road density ACCESS TO 5 POINTS; Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of 70010 COUCH SUMMIT-DEER PARK 70094 SEC 12 0.00 11.70 11.70 FS FS 3 M M H H H H M L H H potential or source habitat and high road density Recreation: Trail Access (SF) Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; seasonal road closure (closed during hunting season); W&A: Road is erosive in several areas, sediment effects on Smoky Dome and Boardman Creeks; several 70010 COUCH SUMMIT-DEER PARK 70094 SEC 12 11.70 21.20 9.50 FS FS 2 M H H H H H M L culverts, steep drainage crossings Range: Few CEDI X SFK B.R., some weeds; Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, seasonal road closure (closed 70011 SKUNK CR 70012 SEC 17 0.00 4.70 4.70 FS FS 2 M H L H H H M H L during hunting season) Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, seasonal 70011A SKUNK CR 70011 SEC 28 0.00 2.40 2.40 FS FS 2 L M L H H M H L road closure (closed during hunting season) Recreation: Camping, Trail Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat 70012 FLECK SUMMIT 70227 70079 0.00 3.60 3.60 CO CO 3 M M H H H H M H L H H and high road density Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70013 KING OF THE WEST 70227 SEC 18 0.00 1.50 1.50 PVT PVT 2 L H L H H M L H low road density Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, Seasonal Road Closure; Engineering: Road not maintained for passenger car 70014 O P CREEK 70011 SEC 19 0.00 5.33 5.33 FS FS 3 L M L H H H H M H L vehicles, recommend lowering to a level 2. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, Seasonal Road Closure; Engineering: Road not maintained for passenger car 70014A FLETCHER-JONES 70014 SEC 4 0.00 4.00 4.00 FS FS 3 L M L H H H H M H L vehicles, recommend lowering to a level 2. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density, Seasonal Road Closure; Engineering: Road not maintained for passenger car 70014B LITTLE SKELETON 70014 SEC 31 0.00 2.23 2.23 FS FS 3 L H L H H M H L vehicles, recommend lowering to a level 2. Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 0.00 3.90 3.90 CO CO 3 M H M H H H M L H H moderate road density Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Road in Little Smoky RCA, no vegetative buffer between road 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 3.90 10.20 6.30 CO CO 3 M H M H H H M L H H and creek in several stretches, riprap to protect road prism Recreation: Private Property; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Road in Little Smoky RCA, no vegetative buffer between 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 10.20 11.70 1.50 FS FS 2 M M M H H M L H road and creek in several stretches, riprap to protect road prism

42 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments FOR Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70017 WILLOW CR SEC 11 BDRY 0.00 4.00 4.00 CO CO 3 M H H H H H H M L H H high road density, Elk Winter Range FOR Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70017 WILLOW CR SEC 11 BDRY 4.00 6.30 2.30 CO CO 3 M H L H H H H M L H H moderate road density or low road density PRIVATE 70017B CHERRY CREEK 70017 LAND 0.00 0.60 0.60 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L Recreation: Private Property; Wildlife: Elk Winter Range Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high 70018 LIBERAL CR 70015 SEC 20 0.00 3.30 3.30 FS FS 2 L M H H H H M L road density Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70023 ABBOT GULCH C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.17 0.17 FS FS 3 L H L H H low road density Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70024 CHAPARRAL C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.47 0.47 FS FS 3 L M L H low road density Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70024A CHAPARRAL CG LOOP A 70024 70024 0.00 0.04 0.04 FS FS 3 L M L H low road density Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70024B CHAPARRAL CG LOOP B 70024 70024 0.00 0.28 0.28 FS FS 3 L M L H low road density Recreation: Campground; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70024C CHAPARRAL CG LOOP C 70024 20024B 0.00 0.06 0.06 FS FS 3 L M L H low road density Recreation: Dispersed camp site less than 300 feet from road intersection. Can access Beaver 70025 BIGHORN 70227 C G 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 2 L H L M L Creek Trailhead 70026 SKELETON C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.30 0.30 FS FS 2 L H L M L Recreation: Dispersed camp site less than 300 feet from road intersection Recreation: Recommend removal; Eng: Road parallels road 70227 and is less than 300 feet 70028 BIG SMOKY 70227 70227 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 2 L M L M L away 70029 BOWNS CR C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.15 0.15 FS FS 3 L M L H Recreation: Campground Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Seasonally closed (during hunting season) – Goshawk 70030 PARADISE TIMBER 70079 SEC 26 0.00 7.80 7.80 FS FS 2 L M H H H H M H L Nests Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low 70030B PARADISE TIMBER SPUR B 70030 SEC 23 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L road density, Seasonally closed (during hunting season) Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density ; Engineering: Need to adjust ending termini, the current segment ends well before the forest boundary and 70031 HEARN CR 70007 SEC 32 0.00 0.63 0.63 FS PVT 2 L L M H H M L private property meet. 70031 HEARN CR 70007 SEC 32 0.63 5.40 4.77 PVT PVT 2 L L H H H Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density 70032 FAULKNER 70007 SEC 9 0.00 0.39 0.39 FS FS 2 L L H M L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density Eng: Accesses private property; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat 70032 FAULKNER 70007 SEC 9 0.39 1.60 1.21 PVT PVT 2 L L H H M L and high road density 70034 MILLER CR 70010 SEC 15 0.00 4.70 4.70 FS FS 2 L L M H H M H L Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density 70043 DOLLARHIDE CORRAL 70227 CORRAL 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 2 L L M L Recreation: Campsite not a road, remove from system; Eng: Road is less than 300 feet away S H 70044 WILCOX S H 70227 AREA 0.00 0.80 0.80 FS PVT 1 L H H H H Recreation: Access to summer home; Wildlife: Elk Winter Range 70050 BIG SMOKY WORK CAMP 70087 CAMP 0.00 0.11 0.11 FS FS 3 L L L H H Recreation: ADMIN 70051 LOWER LITTLE SMOKY 70010 SEC 36 0.00 4.40 4.40 FS FS 2 L M H H H M L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density S H Recreation: Special Use, Trail Access, rec. resident; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential 70052 BIG SMOKY S H AREA 70463 AREA 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 3 L M L H H H H L H or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density SUMMER Recreation: Special Use, Trail Access, rec. resident; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential 70052A BIG SMOKY SH SPUR A 70052 HOMES 0.00 0.09 0.09 FS PVT 3 L M L H H H H or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density SUMMER Recreation: Special Use, Trail Access, rec. resident; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential 70052B BIG SMOKY SH SPUR B 70052A HOMES 0.00 0.06 0.06 FS PVT 3 L M L H H H H or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density 43 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments Summer Recreation: Special Use, Trail Access, rec. resident; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential 70052C BIG SMOKY SH SPUR C 70052 Homes 0.00 0.05 0.05 FS PVT 3 L M L H H H H or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density 70054 SALT CR CORRAL 70010 CORRAL 0.00 0.50 0.50 FS FS 2 L L M H H M L Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density 70054A SALT CR CORRAL CORRAL SEC 36 0.00 0.55 0.55 FS FS 1 L L M H H M L Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density Recreation: Trailhead; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and high road CO density; W&A: Significant road length in RCAs, runoff and sedimentation effects, beaver 70055 HUNTER CR ROAD SEC 15 0.00 7.10 7.10 FS FS 2 L M M H H H M L dam flooding 70056 BARLOW CR 70030 SEC 13 0.00 2.40 2.40 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density 70056A BARLOW CR SPUR 70056 SEC 13 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L L L H H M H L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70069 HAWK GULCH 70055 SEC. 13 0.00 3.30 3.30 FS FS 2 L M L H H M L Significant road length in RCAs Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70070 SALIX CREEK 70055 70007 0.00 2.85 2.85 FS FS 2 L M L H H M L Significant road length in RCAs Recreation: Trails; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road 70071 KELLEY CR CORRAL 70487 SEC 14 0.00 1.40 1.40 FS FS 3 M M L H H H H M L density. Recreation: Trails, Admin (water tank); Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70071A KELLY CR CORRAL SPUR A 70071 SEC 18 0.00 0.51 0.51 FS FS 3 M L L H H H H M L habitat and low road density; W&A: Not near any aquatic resources Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: On 70071B KELLY CR CORRAL SPUR B 70071 SEC 12 0.00 0.08 0.08 FS FS 3 M L L H H H M L flat bench above river – low risk Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70071C KELLEY CR CORRAL SPUR C 70071 70071 0.00 0.17 0.17 FS FS 3 M L L H H H M L On flat bench above river – low risk SEC 14 / Trail 70071D KELLEY CR CORRAL SPUR D 70071 #7030 0.00 0.62 0.62 FS FS 3 M M L H H H M L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density 70071E KELLY CR CORRAL SPUR E 70071 SEC 13 0.00 0.05 0.05 FS FS 3 M L L H H H L Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density Recreation: Trails and private property; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70074 MARSH CR 70227 SEC 21 0.00 6.90 6.90 FS FS 2 L H L H H H H M H L habitat and low road density; W&A: Significant road length in RCAs Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70074A MARSH CR 70074 SEC 31 0.00 2.60 2.60 FS FS 1 L L L H H H H High in drainage, no stream crossings or RCAs 70074/SE Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70074B MARSH CR SPUR B C 20 SEC 32 0.00 3.28 3.28 FS FS 2 L L L H H H H L High in drainage, no stream crossings or RCAs 70074B/S Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70074C MARSH CR SPUR C EC29 SEC 29 0.00 1.69 1.69 FS FS 2 L L L H H H H L High in drainage, no stream crossings or RCAs 70074/SE Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70074D MARSH CR SPUR D C 20 SEC 28 0.00 2.10 2.10 FS FS 2 L L L H H H H L High in drainage, no stream crossings or RCAs Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: 70074E MARSH CREEK SPUR E 70074 S 29 0.00 1.17 1.17 FS FS 2 L L L H H H H L High in drainage, no stream crossings or RCAs PIT LAND / Recreation: Closed to the public; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70075 CHICKEN CREEK 70070 SEC 30 0.00 0.60 0.60 FS FS 1 L M L H H habitat and low road density; W&A: Significant road length in RCAs Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 70076 THOMPSON CR 70007 70031 0.00 2.30 2.30 FS FS 2 L M H H H H M L Significant road length in RCAs Recreation: Trail access, sheep corrals, popular dispersed camping; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: Flat area away from 70078 S BOISE CORRAL 70079 70079 0.00 0.24 0.24 FS FS 2 M L L H H H M H L any aquatic resources Recreation: Trail access, private property; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70079 SOUTH BOISE 70012 SEC 2 0.00 5.90 5.90 CO CO 3 M M M H H H M L source habitat and moderate road density

44 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments Recreation: Trail access, Jeep Trail 888; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70079 SOUTH BOISE 70012 SEC 2 5.90 14.50 8.60 FS FS 1 L H M H H H M L source habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Managed as jeep trail; high WARS priority RED HORSE Recreation: Trail access, Jeep Trail 888; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source MINE / habitat and low road density; W&A: Managed as jeep trail 70080 BEAR CR 70079 SEC 11 0.00 6.30 6.30 FS FS 1 L H L H H H M L SITE / Recreation: Popular dispersed camping; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70081 LIBERAL ADM SITE 70015 SEC 33 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 2 L L H H H M L source habitat and high road density Recreation: Access to Guard Station, camping and trails; Wildlife: Low abundance of 70085 BIG SMOKY 70012 70089 0.00 0.70 0.70 FS FS 4 M M L H H H H L potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density Recreation: Camping (developed & dispersed) and trails; Wildlife: Low abundance of 70085 BIG SMOKY 70012 70089 0.70 1.39 0.69 FS FS 3 M M L H H H M H L potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low road density Recreation: Admin access to Guard Station; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source G S / SEC habitat and moderate road density or low road density; W&A: Flat area away from any 70086 BIG SMOKY GS 70085 2 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 3 L L L H H aquatic resources Recreation: Trail Access and dispersed camping; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential 70087 PARADISE CK 70085 SEC. 2 0.00 0.37 0.37 FS FS 3 L L H H H H M H L or source habitat and high road density CORRAL Recreation: Corral access, elk feeding SUP; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70088 BIG SMOKY CORRAL 70085 / 70085 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 2 L M L H H habitat and moderate road density or low road density C G / SEC Recreation: Campground and trail access/trailhead; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or 70089 CANYON C G 70085 1 0.00 0.17 0.17 FS FS 3 L H L H H H L source habitat and moderate road density or low road density; W&A: Within RCA Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: On 70091 BRUSH CANYON 70095 70095 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L M L H H H L slope away from RCA Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: On 70091 BRUSH CANYON 70095 70095 0.40 1.30 0.90 PVT FS 2 L H L H H H L private land; in RCA and high priority WARS Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: In 70091 BRUSH CANYON 70095 70095 1.30 2.20 0.90 FS FS 2 L H L H H H L RCA Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: On 70092 COUCH GRAVEL PIT 70094 Gravel Pit 0.00 0.25 0.25 FS CO 2 L L L H H H M L ridge high in drainage; no aquatic impacts Recreation: Ski Hill, Pioneer C.G., Trails; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70093 SOLDIER CR 70094 SEC 18 0.00 1.20 1.20 CO CO 3 M H M H H H H M H L source habitat and moderate road density Recreation: Ski Hill, Pioneer C.G., Trails; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70093 SOLDIER CR 70094 SEC 18 1.20 2.50 1.30 CO CO 3 M H L H H H H M H L source habitat and moderate road density BASE Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70094 COUCH SUMMIT LINE 70227 0.00 7.80 7.80 CO CO 4 M L M H H H H M H L habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Valley bottom, off forest for majority of length BASE Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70094 COUCH SUMMIT LINE 70227 7.80 16.30 8.50 CO CO 3 M H M H H H H M H L habitat and moderate road density; W&A: RCA, priority WARS drainage on Soldier Ck side Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70095 WELLS SUMMIT 70094 70015 0.00 1.30 1.30 CO CO 3 M H M H H H H M H L habitat and moderate road density; W&A: RCA Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70095 WELLS SUMMIT 70094 70015 1.30 9.00 7.70 CO CO 3 M H M H H H H M H L habitat and moderate road density; W&A: RCA Recreation: Jeep Trail; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate 70096 DITTO FLAT 70017 70015 0.00 6.30 6.30 FS FS 1 L M M H H H M L road density; W&A: Willow Creek high priority WARS 70098 WELLS SUMMIT GRAVEL PIT 70094 Gravel Pit 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 2 L L M H H L Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density BASE Recreation: Closed Road, Private Property; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source 70133 THREE MILE CR LINE SEC 34 0.00 3.40 3.40 CO CO 1 L L M H H H H H habitat and moderate road density BASE Recreation: Closed Road, Private Property; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source 70133 THREE MILE CR LINE SEC 34 3.40 6.80 3.40 CO FS 1 L L M H H H H H habitat and moderate road density 45 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments Recreation: Closed Road, Private Property; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source 70217 PHILLIPS CR 70094 SEC. 5 0.00 0.50 0.50 CO CO 1 L L H H H H habitat and moderate road density Engineering: Road was recently added back to the system to be used for access to proposed 70225 TYRANIS ROAD 70227 SEC. 18 0.00 1.50 1.50 FS FS 2 L H L H H L H vegetation treatments. FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 24.19 33.38 9.19 CO CO 2 H H H H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In Carrie Ck RCA for majority of length FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 33.38 37.74 4.36 CO CO 3 M H H H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In Little Smoky Ck RCA for majority of length FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 37.74 43.42 5.68 CO CO 4 M H L H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In Little Smoky Ck RCA for majority of length FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 43.42 54.54 11.12 CO CO 3 H H L H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In Big Smoky Ck and S Fk Boise River RCA FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 54.54 58.02 3.48 FS FS 3 M H L H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In S Fk Boise River RCA FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 58.02 62.75 4.73 FS FS 4 M H L H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In S Fk Boise River RCA FOR Recreation: Main Forest Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and 70227 KETCHUM-FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 62.75 66.80 4.05 FS FS 4 M H L H H H H M H L high road density; W&A: In S Fk Boise River RCA Trail #7027 / Recreation: Jumbo Creek Trail Access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70241 TR #7027 TRAILHEAD ROAD 70227 SEC 8 0.00 0.12 0.12 FS FS 2 L L L H H H M L habitat and moderate road density or low road density; W&A: On bench away from creek Trail # 7022 / Recreation: IDFG feed site SUP, Trail Access Big Water; Wildlife: Low abundance of 70244 VANSKIKE 70227 SEC 12 0.00 0.65 0.65 FS FS 2 L L M H H H L potential or source habitat and high road density Trail #7023 / Recreation: Trail Access, Van Gulch; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70244A 70244 SPUR A 70244 SEC 11 0.00 0.36 0.36 FS FS 2 L M M H H M H L habitat and high road density; W&A: Crossing of Van Gulch at end Trail #7068 / Recreation: Trail Access, Bridge Creek; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 70248 TR #7068 TRAILHEAD ROAD 70079 SEC 16 0.00 0.38 0.38 FS FS 2 L L M H H H M H L source habitat and moderate road density; W&A: Dry upland site BUTTER CUP MINE / Recreation: Mine; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate 70418 BUTTERCUP 70017 SEC 7 0.00 3.10 3.10 FS FS 2 L H M H H H H M L road density; W&A: In WARS priority, RCA Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 70418A NEBRASKA CREEK 70418 Sec 18 0.00 0.85 0.85 FS FS 2 L M H H H H L Mainly in uplands Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70420 CANNONBALL 70095 SEC 29 0.00 4.70 4.70 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L high road density Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: High 70421 REDROCK 70015 SEC. 1 0.00 2.70 2.70 FS FS 2 L H H H H M L percentage in RCA C G / SEC Recreation: Pioneer CG; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70424 PIONEER C G 70093 19 0.00 0.15 0.15 FS FS 3 M H M H H H moderate road density Recreation: Pioneer CG; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70424A PIONEER CG SPUR A 70424 SEC 19 0.00 0.07 0.07 FS FS 3 M H M H H H moderate road density

46 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments C G / SEC Recreation: Five Points CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70425 FIVE POINTS C G 70094 5 0.00 0.14 0.14 FS FS 3 M M L H H moderate road density or low road density Recreation: Five Points CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70425A FIVE POINTS CG SPUR A 70425 SEC 5 0.00 0.02 0.02 FS FS 3 M M L H moderate road density or low road density AREA / Recreation: Miller Creek Trail Access, IDFG Cabin SUP; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of 70463 GAME CABIN 70227 SEC 11 0.00 0.60 0.60 FS FS 2 L M H H H M H L potential or source habitat and high road density Recreation: Lick Creek Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source 70464 LICK CR 70227 SEC. 7 0.00 1.00 1.00 FS FS 3 L M L H H H H M H L habitat and low road density Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465 WORSWICK CR.-BIG PEAK 70227 SEC 10 0.00 8.00 8.00 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M H L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High percentage in RCA Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465A WARSWICK CR. SPUR A 70465 SEC 29 0.00 2.19 2.19 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High in drainage; no stream crossings Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465B WARSWACK CR. SPUR B 70465A SEC 28 0.00 1.43 1.43 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High in drainage; no stream crossings Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465C WARSWICK CR. SPUR C 70465 SEC 16 0.00 0.81 0.81 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High in drainage; no stream crossings Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465D WARSWICK CR. SPUR D 70465 SEC 15 0.00 1.60 1.60 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High in drainage; no stream crossings Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density, 70465E WARSWICK CR. SPUR E 70465 SEC 22 0.00 3.34 3.34 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Seasonally Closed; W&A: High in drainage; no stream crossings Geology: Mine Access; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high 70468 MC HAN GULCH 70094 SEC 8 0.00 0.80 0.80 FS FS 1 L H H H M L road density , private road – poor condition, closed by gate; W&A: Stream crossing; RCA Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density , closed to 70469 SOUTH FLECK SUMMIT 70012 SEC 10 0.00 1.50 1.50 FS FS 1 L L H H H H public by gate; W&A: High in drainage Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density , closed to 70469A SOUTH FLECK SUMMIT SPUR A 70469 SEC 11 0.00 1.60 1.60 FS FS 1 L L H H H H public by gate; W&A: High in drainage Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density , closed to 70469B SOUTH FLECK SUMMIT SPUR B 70469A SEC 3 0.00 0.30 0.30 FS FS 1 L L H H H H public by gate; W&A: High in drainage Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 4 70471 WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70227 SEC 3 0.00 6.70 6.70 FS FS 2 L H H H H H M L stream crossings, ford across SF Boise Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 4 70471A WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70471 SEC 3 0.00 2.80 2.80 FS FS 2 L M H H H H M L stream crossings on Rosetta Ck Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 70471B WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70471-A SEC 34 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Upland; minimal aquatic risk Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 70471C WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70471-A SEC 3 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Upland; minimal aquatic risk Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: One 70471D WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70471 SEC 5 0.00 1.50 1.50 FS FS 2 L M H H H H M L stream crossing Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and high road density; W&A: 70471E WILLIAMS-ROSETTA 70471 70471-D 0.00 1.90 1.90 FS FS 2 L L H H H H M L Upland; no aquatic risk Recreation: Trail Access; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or source habitat and 70484 EAR CREEK 70007 SEC 2 0.00 6.20 6.20 ST FS 2 L M H H H H H M L high road density; W&A: Road in RCA, several crossings PARK / Recreation: Baumgartner CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70487 BAUMGARTNER PARK 70227 SEC 7 0.00 0.91 0.91 FS FS 4 M M M H H H high road density Recreation: Baumgartner CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70487A BAUMGARTNER PARK LOOP A 70487 70487 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 4 M M M H H high road density Recreation: Baumgartner CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70487B BAUMGARTNER PARK LOOP B 70487 70487 0.00 0.14 0.14 FS FS 4 M M M H H high road density Recreation: Baumgartner CG; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and 70487C BAUMGARTNER PARK SPUR C 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.04 0.04 FS FS 4 M M M H H high road density

47 | P a g e

Risks Benefits

2)

12)

-

4)

-

(Item (Item

o Active Mineral or

Use Sites (Items 1 Sites(Items Use

Road

Beginning Termini EndingTermini B.M.P. E.M.P. Length (Miles) Jurisdiction Primary Maintainer Operational Maint. Level Safety (Item 1) Wildlife (Item 3) Noxious Weeds (Item 4) Maintenance (Item Costs 5) Watershed & WatershedAquatics & toor Admin. Rec., PR Access , Special to Timber & Access Commodity5) (Item to Range Watering andAccess 6)Sites(Item to ProvideEstablished Access 7) Sites(Item Dispersed Rec. for fuels andAccess fire 8) protection WUI (Item in 9) (Item to Use General Access t Access 10) SitesEnergy(Item Prod. Arterial/Collector Rd (Items 11 (Items Rd Arterial/Collector No. Name and/or Maint. Agreement Comments Recreation: Kelly Flats Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70487D BAUMGARTNER PARK LOOP D 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.19 0.19 FS FS 2 M M M H M L habitat and high road density Recreation: Kelly Flats Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70487E BAUMGARTNER PARK SPUR E 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.24 0.24 FS FS 2 M M M H M L habitat and high road density Recreation: Kelly Flats Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70487F BAUMGARTNER PARK SPUR F 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.04 0.04 FS FS 2 M M M H M L habitat and high road density Recreation: Kelly Flats Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70487G BAUMGARTNER PARK SPUR G 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.05 0.05 FS FS 2 M M M H M L habitat and high road density C G / SEC Recreation: Bird Creek CG; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low 70488 BIRD CR C G 70227 5 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 3 M M L H H road density C G / SEC Recreation: Bird Creek CG; Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low 70488A BIRD CR C G SPUR A 70488 5 0.00 0.10 0.10 FS FS 3 M M L H H road density 70071/SE Recreation: Kelly Flats Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 70596 ELK TRAP C 7 Sec 13 0.00 0.50 0.50 FS FS 2 L M M H M L habitat and high road density Wildlife: High abundance of potential or source habitat and low road density; W&A: Upland 70597 STEVENS GULCH 70227 70227 0.00 0.30 0.30 FS FS 2 L M L H M H L site; disturbed soils and lots of routes surrounding this road AREA / 70599 O.K.GULCH 70227 SEC 6 0.00 0.20 0.20 FS FS 2 L M M L Recreation: Bird Creek Dispersed Camping; W&A: In S Fk Boise RCA Recreation: Stevens Gulch Trail Access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source RANCH / habitat and moderate road density or low road density; W&A: In Stevens Gulch RCA 70895 SOUTH FORK RANCH 70227 SEC 11 0.00 0.20 0.20 PVT PVT 3 L M L H H L Recreation: Little Water Trail Access; Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source 7020 / habitat and moderate road density or low road density access for winter elk feeding; W&A: 75002 LITTLE WATER GULCH 70227 SEC 7 0.00 0.70 0.70 FS FS 2 L H L H H H M H L In Little Water Gulch RCA Wildlife: Low abundance of potential or source habitat and moderate road density or low 75003 BOWNS CR 70463 SEC 14 0.00 0.30 0.30 FS FS 2 L H H H H M H L road density; W&A: In Bowns Ck RCA Recreation: Popular Dispersed Camping; Wildlife: Moderate abundance of potential or 75004 CONFLUENCE ROAD 70227 SEC 9 0.00 0.40 0.40 FS FS 2 L H L H M L source habitat and low road density W&A: In S Fk Boise River RCA

48 | P a g e

Appendix C – Recommended Road Management Strategies Table

Fairfield Ranger District Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation INT FOR BDRY/B NF Trail X This road is at a desirable condition as the 155/SEC 7214/SEC values are high and the known risks are or 155A ABBOT GULCH 15 11 0.00 1.59 1.59 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the INT FOR values are high and the known risks are or BDRY/16 X can be mitigated. This section of road has LOG CHUTE 6B1 / the M.L. lowered as part of the Roads 166B1 GULCH SEC 30 SEC 18 0.00 4.22 4.22 3 Reduction Strategy in FY13. Timber extraction is complete therefore, the risks for this road now outweigh the LOG CHUTE 166B1/SE X values thus it is recommended it be 166B1A GULCH SPUR A C 14 SEC 14 0.00 1.25 1.25 2 decommissioned. This road is at a desirable condition as the LOG CHUTE 166B1/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166B1B GULCH SPUR B C 13 SEC 13 0.00 1.42 1.42 2 can be mitigated. 166B3 This road is at a desirable condition as the GATE/SE 166D/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166B3 SPUR 166B3 C 30 20 0.00 3.57 3.57 2 can be mitigated. BNF- This road is at a desirable condition as the 166D/SE values are high and the known risks are or C can be mitigated. 29/FORE X ST 166D SPUR 166D BDRY SEC 16 0.00 3.90 3.90 2

49 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation 166D/SE This road is at a desirable condition as the C 29/ values are high and the known risks are or FOREST X can be mitigated. 166D4 SPUR 166D4 BDRY SEC 28 0.00 2.84 2.84 2 This road is at a desirable condition as the 166D/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166D5 SPUR 166D5 C 21 SEC 17 0.00 2.02 2.02 2 can be mitigated. BNF- This road is at a desirable condition as the 166/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166N SPUR 166N 5 SEC 4 0.00 1.14 1.14 2 can be mitigated. BNF- This road is at a desirable condition as the 166/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166N SPUR 166N 5 SEC 4 1.14 2.40 1.26 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the 166N/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166N1 SPUR 166N1 C 4 SEC 10 0.00 6.93 6.93 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the 166N1/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166N2 SPUR 166N2 C 21 SEC 4 0.00 0.34 0.34 2 can be mitigated. BNF- This road is at a desirable condition as the 166/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166O SPUR 166O 8 SEC 9 0.00 1.31 1.31 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the 166O/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166O2 SPUR 166O2 C 8 SEC 9 0.00 0.54 0.54 2 can be mitigated. BNF- BNF- The risks for this road far outweigh the 166/SEC 166/SEC X values thus it is recommended it be 166P SPUR 166P 8 17 0.00 0.34 0.34 1 decommissioned. BNF - This road is at a desirable condition as the 166/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166R SPUR 166R 17 SEC 17 0.00 1.37 1.37 2 can be mitigated.

50 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the 166R/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166R1 SPUR 166R1 C17 SEC 21 0.00 2.92 2.92 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the 166R1/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 166R2 SPUR 166R2 C 20 SEC 22 0.00 1.12 1.12 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 166T SPUR 166T 166 SEC 32 0.00 0.84 0.84 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 166T SPUR 166T 166 SEC 32 0.84 1.28 0.44 2 can be mitigated. BNF - This road is at a desirable condition as the 166/SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 166T1 SPUR 166T1 29 SEC 29 0.00 1.35 1.35 2 can be mitigated. The risks for this road far outweigh the 166T/SE X values thus it is recommended it be 166T2 SPUR 166T2 C 29 SEC 29 0.00 0.25 0.25 1 decommissioned. This road is at a desirable condition as the Forest X values are high and the known risks are or 181 SNF 181 Bdry. 70055 0.00 0.20 0.20 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BARKER X values are high and the known risks are or 70001 GULCH 70227 CREEK 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70003 WARBOIS 70074 SEC 1 0.00 4.80 4.80 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70003A WARBOIS 70003 SEC 6 0.00 1.00 1.00 2 can be mitigated.

51 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70003B WARBOIS 70003 SEC 36 0.00 0.80 0.80 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70004 SHAKE CR R S 70227 70227 0.00 0.09 0.09 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SHAKE CR GS X values are high and the known risks are or 70004A SPUR A 70004 70227 0.00 0.15 0.15 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SHAKE CR GS X values are high and the known risks are or 70004B SPUR B 70004A SEC 8 0.00 0.04 0.04 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SEC 4 / X values are high and the known risks are or 70005 SHAKE CR 70227 Trailhead 0.00 0.80 0.80 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLOW CR C C G / X values are high and the known risks are or 70006 G 70008 70008 0.00 0.30 0.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 0.00 5.00 5.00 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 5.00 7.10 2.10 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 7.10 8.00 0.90 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 8.00 9.10 1.10 2 can be mitigated.

52 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 9.10 10.70 1.60 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 10.70 11.70 1.00 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 11.70 12.50 0.80 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO. X values are high and the known risks are or 70007 CHIMNEY CR. ROAD 70069 12.50 12.70 0.20 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLOW X values are high and the known risks are or 70008 CREEK WEST 70227 SEC. 3 0.00 1.50 1.50 3 can be mitigated. COUCH This road is at a desirable condition as the SUMMIT-DEER X values are high and the known risks are or 70010 PARK 70094 SEC 12 0.00 11.70 11.70 3 can be mitigated. COUCH This road is at a desirable condition as the SUMMIT-DEER X values are high and the known risks are or 70010 PARK 70094 SEC 12 11.70 21.20 9.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70011 SKUNK CR 70012 SEC 17 0.00 4.70 4.70 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70011A SKUNK CR 70011 SEC 28 0.00 2.40 2.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70012 FLECK SUMMIT 70227 70079 0.00 3.60 3.60 3 can be mitigated.

53 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the KING OF THE X values are high and the known risks are or 70013 WEST 70227 SEC 18 0.00 1.50 1.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the values are high and the known risks are or X can be mitigated. Road is not maintained as 70014 O P CREEK 70011 SEC 19 0.00 5.33 5.33 3 a ML 3, recommend lowering to a ML2. This road is at a desirable condition as the values are high and the known risks are or FLETCHER- X can be mitigated. Road is not maintained as 70014A JONES 70014 SEC 4 0.00 4.00 4.00 3 a ML 3, recommend lowering to a ML2. This road is at a desirable condition as the values are high and the known risks are or LITTLE X can be mitigated. Road is not maintained as 70014B SKELETON 70014 SEC 31 0.00 2.23 2.23 3 a ML 3, recommend lowering to a ML2. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 0.00 3.90 3.90 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 3.90 10.20 6.30 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70015 LITTLE SMOKY 70227 SEC 16 10.20 11.70 1.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70017 WILLOW CR SEC 11 BDRY 0.00 4.00 4.00 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70017 WILLOW CR SEC 11 BDRY 4.00 6.30 2.30 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the PRIVATE X values are high and the known risks are or 70017B CHERRY CREEK 70017 LAND 0.00 0.60 0.60 2 can be mitigated. 54 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70018 LIBERAL CR 70015 SEC 20 0.00 3.30 3.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the ABBOT GULCH X values are high and the known risks are or 70023 C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.17 0.17 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CHAPARRAL C X values are high and the known risks are or 70024 G 70227 C G 0.00 0.47 0.47 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CHAPARRAL X values are high and the known risks are or 70024A CG LOOP A 70024 70024 0.00 0.04 0.04 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CHAPARRAL X values are high and the known risks are or 70024B CG LOOP B 70024 70024 0.00 0.28 0.28 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CHAPARRAL X values are high and the known risks are or 70024C CG LOOP C 70024 20024B 0.00 0.06 0.06 3 can be mitigated. The road is within 300 feet of FSR70227 thus it is not necessary to be a system road X so it is recommended it be 70025 BIGHORN 70227 C G 0.00 0.10 0.10 2 decommissioned. The road is within 300 feet of FSR70227 thus it is not necessary to be a system road X so it is recommended it be 70026 SKELETON C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.30 0.30 2 decommissioned. The road parallels FSR 70227 and is within 300 feet from it thus it is not necessary to X be a system road so it is recommended it 70028 BIG SMOKY 70227 70227 0.00 0.10 0.10 2 be decommissioned. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70029 BOWNS CR C G 70227 C G 0.00 0.15 0.15 3 can be mitigated. 55 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the PARADISE X values are high and the known risks are or 70030 TIMBER 70079 SEC 26 0.00 7.80 7.80 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the PARADISE X values are high and the known risks are or 70030B TIMBER SPUR B 70030 SEC 23 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70031 HEARN CR 70007 SEC 32 0.00 0.63 0.63 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70031 HEARN CR 70007 SEC 32 0.63 5.40 4.77 2 can be mitigated. The risks for this road outweigh the values thus it is recommended it be X decommissioned. But prior to removing from system will need to verify if there is 70032 FAULKNER 70007 SEC 9 0.00 0.39 0.39 2 an easement on this section of road. The risks for this road outweigh the values thus it is recommended it be X decommissioned. But prior to removing from system will need to verify if there is 70032 FAULKNER 70007 SEC 9 0.39 1.60 1.21 2 an easement on this section of road. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70034 MILLER CR 70010 SEC 15 0.00 4.70 4.70 2 can be mitigated. The dispersed campsite is within 300 feet from FSR 70227 it thus it is not necessary DOLLARHIDE X to be a system road so it is recommended it 70043 CORRAL 70227 CORRAL 0.00 0.10 0.10 2 be decommissioned. This road is at a desirable condition as the S H X values are high and the known risks are or 70044 WILCOX S H 70227 AREA 0.00 0.80 0.80 1 can be mitigated.

56 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY X values are high and the known risks are or 70050 WORK CAMP 70087 CAMP 0.00 0.11 0.11 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the LOWER LITTLE X values are high and the known risks are or 70051 SMOKY 70010 SEC 36 0.00 4.40 4.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY S H S H X values are high and the known risks are or 70052 AREA 70463 AREA 0.00 0.40 0.40 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY SH SUMMER X values are high and the known risks are or 70052A SPUR A 70052 HOMES 0.00 0.09 0.09 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY SH SUMMER X values are high and the known risks are or 70052B SPUR B 70052A HOMES 0.00 0.06 0.06 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY SH Summer X values are high and the known risks are or 70052C SPUR C 70052 Homes 0.00 0.05 0.05 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SALT CR X values are high and the known risks are or 70054 CORRAL 70010 CORRAL 0.00 0.50 0.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SALT CR X values are high and the known risks are or 70054A CORRAL CORRAL SEC 36 0.00 0.55 0.55 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CO X values are high and the known risks are or 70055 HUNTER CR ROAD SEC 15 0.00 7.10 7.10 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70056 BARLOW CR 70030 SEC 13 0.00 2.40 2.40 2 can be mitigated.

57 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the BARLOW CR X values are high and the known risks are or 70056A SPUR 70056 SEC 13 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70069 HAWK GULCH 70055 SEC. 13 0.00 3.30 3.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70070 SALIX CREEK 70055 70007 0.00 2.85 2.85 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KELLEY CR X values are high and the known risks are or 70071 CORRAL 70487 SEC 14 0.00 1.40 1.40 3 can be mitigated. KELLY CR This road is at a desirable condition as the CORRAL SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70071A A 70071 SEC 18 0.00 0.51 0.51 3 can be mitigated. KELLY CR This road is at a desirable condition as the CORRAL SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70071B B 70071 SEC 12 0.00 0.08 0.08 3 can be mitigated. KELLEY CR This road is at a desirable condition as the CORRAL SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70071C C 70071 70071 0.00 0.17 0.17 3 can be mitigated. KELLEY CR SEC 14 / This road is at a desirable condition as the CORRAL SPUR Trail X values are high and the known risks are or 70071D D 70071 #7030 0.00 0.62 0.62 3 can be mitigated. KELLY CR This road is at a desirable condition as the CORRAL SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70071E E 70071 SEC 13 0.00 0.05 0.05 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70074 MARSH CR 70227 SEC 21 0.00 6.90 6.90 2 can be mitigated.

58 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70074A MARSH CR 70074 SEC 31 0.00 2.60 2.60 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the MARSH CR 70074/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 70074B SPUR B C 20 SEC 32 0.00 3.28 3.28 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the MARSH CR 70074B/S X values are high and the known risks are or 70074C SPUR C EC29 SEC 29 0.00 1.69 1.69 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the MARSH CR 70074/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 70074D SPUR D C 20 SEC 28 0.00 2.10 2.10 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the MARSH CREEK X values are high and the known risks are or 70074E SPUR E 70074 S 29 0.00 1.17 1.17 2 can be mitigated. PIT This road is at a desirable condition as the CHICKEN LAND / X values are high and the known risks are or 70075 CREEK 70070 SEC 30 0.00 0.60 0.60 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70076 THOMPSON CR 70007 70031 0.00 2.30 2.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the S BOISE X values are high and the known risks are or 70078 CORRAL 70079 70079 0.00 0.24 0.24 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70079 SOUTH BOISE 70012 SEC 2 0.00 5.90 5.90 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70079 SOUTH BOISE 70012 SEC 2 5.90 14.50 8.60 1 can be mitigated.

59 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the values are high and the known risks are or RED can be mitigated, but since the road is HORSE X currently used more as a jeep trail then it is MINE / recommended it be removed from system 70080 BEAR CR 70079 SEC 11 0.00 6.30 6.30 1 and added to the trail system as such. This road is at a desirable condition as the LIBERAL ADM SITE / X values are high and the known risks are or 70081 SITE 70015 SEC 33 0.00 0.10 0.10 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70085 BIG SMOKY 70012 70089 0.00 0.70 0.70 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70085 BIG SMOKY 70012 70089 0.70 1.39 0.69 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the G S / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70086 BIG SMOKY GS 70085 2 0.00 0.10 0.10 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70087 PARADISE CK 70085 SEC. 2 0.00 0.37 0.37 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIG SMOKY CORRAL X values are high and the known risks are or 70088 CORRAL 70085 / 70085 0.00 0.20 0.20 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the C G / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70089 CANYON C G 70085 1 0.00 0.17 0.17 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BRUSH X values are high and the known risks are or 70091 CANYON 70095 70095 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BRUSH X values are high and the known risks are or 70091 CANYON 70095 70095 0.40 1.30 0.90 2 can be mitigated. 60 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the BRUSH X values are high and the known risks are or 70091 CANYON 70095 70095 1.30 2.20 0.90 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the COUCH X values are high and the known risks are or 70092 GRAVEL PIT 70094 Gravel Pit 0.00 0.25 0.25 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70093 SOLDIER CR 70094 SEC 18 0.00 1.20 1.20 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70093 SOLDIER CR 70094 SEC 18 1.20 2.50 1.30 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the COUCH BASE X values are high and the known risks are or 70094 SUMMIT LINE 70227 0.00 7.80 7.80 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the COUCH BASE X values are high and the known risks are or 70094 SUMMIT LINE 70227 7.80 16.30 8.50 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70095 WELLS SUMMIT 70094 70015 0.00 1.30 1.30 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70095 WELLS SUMMIT 70094 70015 1.30 9.00 7.70 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70096 DITTO FLAT 70017 70015 0.00 6.30 6.30 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WELLS SUMMIT X values are high and the known risks are or 70098 GRAVEL PIT 70094 Gravel Pit 0.00 0.20 0.20 2 can be mitigated.

61 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the BASE X values are high and the known risks are or 70133 THREE MILE CR LINE SEC 34 0.00 3.40 3.40 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BASE X values are high and the known risks are or 70133 THREE MILE CR LINE SEC 34 3.40 6.80 3.40 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70217 PHILLIPS CR 70094 SEC. 5 0.00 0.50 0.50 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70225 TYRANIS ROAD 70227 SEC. 18 0.00 1.50 1.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 24.19 33.38 9.19 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 33.38 37.74 4.36 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 37.74 43.42 5.68 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 43.42 54.54 11.12 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 54.54 58.02 3.48 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 58.02 62.75 4.73 4 can be mitigated.

62 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the KETCHUM- FOR X values are high and the known risks are or 70227 FEATHERVILLE SH 75 BDRY 62.75 66.80 4.05 4 can be mitigated. TR #7027 Trail This road is at a desirable condition as the TRAILHEAD #7027 / X values are high and the known risks are or 70241 ROAD 70227 SEC 8 0.00 0.12 0.12 2 can be mitigated. Trail # This road is at a desirable condition as the 7022 / X values are high and the known risks are or 70244 VANSKIKE 70227 SEC 12 0.00 0.65 0.65 2 can be mitigated. Trail This road is at a desirable condition as the #7023 / X values are high and the known risks are or 70244A 70244 SPUR A 70244 SEC 11 0.00 0.36 0.36 2 can be mitigated. TR #7068 Trail This road is at a desirable condition as the TRAILHEAD #7068 / X values are high and the known risks are or 70248 ROAD 70079 SEC 16 0.00 0.38 0.38 2 can be mitigated. BUTTER This road is at a desirable condition as the CUP values are high and the known risks are or MINE / X can be mitigated. 70418 BUTTERCUP 70017 SEC 7 0.00 3.10 3.10 2 This road is at a desirable condition as the NEBRASKA X values are high and the known risks are or 70418A CREEK 70418 Sec 18 0.00 0.85 0.85 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70420 CANNONBALL 70095 SEC 29 0.00 4.70 4.70 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70421 REDROCK 70015 SEC. 1 0.00 2.70 2.70 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the C G / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70424 PIONEER C G 70093 19 0.00 0.15 0.15 3 can be mitigated.

63 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the PIONEER CG X values are high and the known risks are or 70424A SPUR A 70424 SEC 19 0.00 0.07 0.07 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the FIVE POINTS C C G / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70425 G 70094 5 0.00 0.14 0.14 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the FIVE POINTS X values are high and the known risks are or 70425A CG SPUR A 70425 SEC 5 0.00 0.02 0.02 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the AREA / X values are high and the known risks are or 70463 GAME CABIN 70227 SEC 11 0.00 0.60 0.60 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70464 LICK CR 70227 SEC. 7 0.00 1.00 1.00 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WORSWICK X values are high and the known risks are or 70465 CR.-BIG PEAK 70227 SEC 10 0.00 8.00 8.00 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WARSWICK CR. X values are high and the known risks are or 70465A SPUR A 70465 SEC 29 0.00 2.19 2.19 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WARSWACK X values are high and the known risks are or 70465B CR. SPUR B 70465A SEC 28 0.00 1.43 1.43 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WARSWICK CR. X values are high and the known risks are or 70465C SPUR C 70465 SEC 16 0.00 0.81 0.81 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WARSWICK CR. X values are high and the known risks are or 70465D SPUR D 70465 SEC 15 0.00 1.60 1.60 2 can be mitigated.

64 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the WARSWICK CR. X values are high and the known risks are or 70465E SPUR E 70465 SEC 22 0.00 3.34 3.34 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the MC HAN X values are high and the known risks are or 70468 GULCH 70094 SEC 8 0.00 0.80 0.80 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SOUTH FLECK X values are high and the known risks are or 70469 SUMMIT 70012 SEC 10 0.00 1.50 1.50 1 can be mitigated. SOUTH FLECK This road is at a desirable condition as the SUMMIT SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70469A A 70469 SEC 11 0.00 1.60 1.60 1 can be mitigated. SOUTH FLECK This road is at a desirable condition as the SUMMIT SPUR X values are high and the known risks are or 70469B B 70469A SEC 3 0.00 0.30 0.30 1 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471 ROSETTA 70227 SEC 3 0.00 6.70 6.70 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471A ROSETTA 70471 SEC 3 0.00 2.80 2.80 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471B ROSETTA 70471-A SEC 34 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471C ROSETTA 70471-A SEC 3 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471D ROSETTA 70471 SEC 5 0.00 1.50 1.50 2 can be mitigated.

65 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the WILLIAMS- X values are high and the known risks are or 70471E ROSETTA 70471 70471-D 0.00 1.90 1.90 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 70484 EAR CREEK 70007 SEC 2 0.00 6.20 6.20 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE PARK / X values are high and the known risks are or 70487 R PARK 70227 SEC 7 0.00 0.91 0.91 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487A R PARK LOOP A 70487 70487 0.00 0.20 0.20 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487B R PARK LOOP B 70487 70487 0.00 0.14 0.14 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487C R PARK SPUR C 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.04 0.04 4 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487D R PARK LOOP D 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.19 0.19 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487E R PARK SPUR E 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.24 0.24 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487F R PARK SPUR F 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.04 0.04 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BAUMGARTNE X values are high and the known risks are or 70487G R PARK SPUR G 70487 SEC 7 0.00 0.05 0.05 2 can be mitigated.

66 | P a g e

Road Management

Recommendation

-

Current

Trail

M.L. M.L.

Current Change

Remain mission

Road Begin End Length Oper. Decom No. Name Ternini Termini B.M.P. E.M.P. (miles) M.L. Convertto Reason for Recommendation This road is at a desirable condition as the C G / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70488 BIRD CR C G 70227 5 0.00 0.20 0.20 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the BIRD CR C G C G / SEC X values are high and the known risks are or 70488A SPUR A 70488 5 0.00 0.10 0.10 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the 70071/SE X values are high and the known risks are or 70596 ELK TRAP C 7 Sec 13 0.00 0.50 0.50 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the STEVENS X values are high and the known risks are or 70597 GULCH 70227 70227 0.00 0.30 0.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the AREA / X values are high and the known risks are or 70599 O.K.GULCH 70227 SEC 6 0.00 0.20 0.20 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the SOUTH FORK RANCH / X values are high and the known risks are or 70895 RANCH 70227 SEC 11 0.00 0.20 0.20 3 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the LITTLE WATER 7020 / X values are high and the known risks are or 75002 GULCH 70227 SEC 7 0.00 0.70 0.70 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the X values are high and the known risks are or 75003 BOWNS CR 70463 SEC 14 0.00 0.30 0.30 2 can be mitigated. This road is at a desirable condition as the CONFLUENCE X values are high and the known risks are or 75004 ROAD 70227 SEC 9 0.00 0.40 0.40 2 can be mitigated.

67 | P a g e

Appendix D – Divisional Map Displaying Recommended Road Management Strategies

68 | P a g e