Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule, Office of the Federal Register 04/15/2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule, Office of the Federal Register 04/15/2011 21272 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules umbrella, constitutes time that must be statutory and regulatory interpretation DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE included in the calculation of duty time suggest that the specific standard of one to determine the rest required under day off every week cannot be rendered Forest Service § 121.377, whether or not that unit itself completely inoperative by the more must adhere to the requirements of general equivalent standard. A previous 36 CFR Part 294 § 121.377. An employee using accrued interpretation allowed that a work RIN 0596–AC74 vacation or credit time is not ‘‘on duty’’ schedule that provides for personnel to even though the employee may receive have a group of 4 days off followed by Special Areas; Roadless Area compensation for that time. up to 24 days of work, or vice versa, Conservation; Applicability to the Nevertheless, the regulation aims to would still meet the standard of being National Forests in Colorado require repair stations to give its ‘‘equivalent’’ to one day off in every maintenance personnel at least one day AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. seven within a month. Legal off every week without requiring that ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. employee to use accrued vacation time Interpretation to Ron Webb from Donald to be free from any responsibility for P. Byrne, Assistant Chief Counsel, SUMMARY: The Forest Service, U.S. work. Regulations (June 21, 1991). That Department of Agriculture (USDA), is Once Pratt relieves the employee from interpretation, however, was issued proposing to establish a State-specific duty, the regulation does not require prior to the findings relating fatigue to rule to provide management direction Pratt to monitor the employee’s maintenance related errors in the air for conserving and managing activities. The scenario where an carrier industry discussed in AC 120– inventoried roadless areas on National employee uses the time off from Pratt to 72. Webster’s dictionary defines Forest System (NFS) lands in Colorado. work at another maintenance facility ‘‘equivalent’’ as having logical A proposed rule was published in the does not implicate Pratt’s compliance equivalence, or corresponding or July 25, 2008, Federal Register. In with § 121.377. Unlike the regulations virtually identical in effect or function. response to public comment on the 2008 governing crewmember duty time, Today, we would not view as compliant Proposed Rule and a revised petition § 121.377 does not contain a limit on an a schedule that provides over the course submitted by the State of Colorado on April 6, 2010, the Forest Service is employee’s total accumulated working of eight weeks for four days off followed publishing a new proposed rule. hours within a specified period of time. by 48 straight days of duty followed by The Agency is inviting public The FAA does not recommend this four more days off. Such a work practice, however, for the reasons comment on this new proposed rule and schedule that generally provides for an discussed in AC 120–72 related to accompanying revised draft average of one day off over several fatigue. Thus, an employee relieved environmental impact statement ‘‘ ’’ from duty by Pratt may perform other weeks cannot be said to be equivalent (RDEIS). The Agency is interested in aviation related maintenance, even for to the more specific standard requiring public comments on the changes to other facilities which themselves are one day off out of every seven days. exceptions and prohibitions on bound by § 121.377, provided the Lastly, you correctly note that the activities in roadless areas that have employee is provided the requisite time regulation does not address the length of been developed in response to public off by each facility for which the the work day, only the length of the comments on the 2008 Proposed Rule. employee works. Pratt must use caution, required time off work. The legal The Agency is particularly interested in however, not to create the appearance of interpretation from Mr. Byrne to Mr. receiving public comments on the requiring an employee to work during Webb also makes clear that the general concept, management, and rationale for off hours for another facility that is just equivalency provision in § 121.377 does designation of specific areas within a corporate sister to the Pratt facility. not apply to the specific requirement to Colorado Roadless Areas identified as You also raise the question of whether give 24 consecutive hours of time off. ‘‘upper tier.’’ In this proposed rule, these a facility can schedule employees to Time off may not be provided in smaller areas are provided a higher level of work more than six consecutive days, protection than the 2001 Roadless Rule, thereby grouping required days off, and increments over several days even though the total time off over any seven DATES: Comments must be received in still remain in compliance with writing by July 14, 2011. § 121.377. The regulatory standard day period may equal or exceed 24 ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via requires 24 consecutive hours off duty hours. e-mail to [email protected]. during any seven consecutive days but We appreciate your patience and trust Comments may also be submitted via also contains some flexibility in the that the above responds to your the Internet at http:// phrase ‘‘or the equivalent thereof within concerns. If you need further assistance, www.regulations.gov. Written comments any one calendar month.’’ The FAA please contact my staff at (202) 267– concerning this notice should be intended that the regulation allow 3073. This response was prepared by addressed to: Colorado Roadless Rule/ employees to work in excess of six Anne Bechdolt, Attorney in the EIS, P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento, CA consecutive days in the event of a Operations Law Branch of the national emergency or unusual 95812. Regulations Division of the Office of the All comments, including names and occurrence in the air carrier industry. Chief Counsel, and coordinated with the addresses, are placed in the record and See Legal Interpretation 1987–15 (June Aircraft Maintenance and Air are available for public inspection and 14, 1987). The regulatory flexibility copying. The public may inspect found in § 121.377 allows maintenance Transportation divisions of Flight comments received at http:// personnel to work a schedule that Standards Service. roadless.fs.fed.us. maintains the ‘‘equivalent’’ to one day Rebecca B. MacPherson, off every week even though that Assistant Chief Counsel, Regulations Division FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: schedule might provide for more than [FR Doc. 2011–9236 Filed 4–14–11; 8:45 am] Colorado Roadless Rule Team Leader six consecutive days of work. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Ken Tu at (303) 275–5156. Individuals The equivalent standard, however, using telecommunication devices for the does have limits. The tenants of deaf (TDD) may call the Federal VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:22 Apr 14, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\15APP1.SGM 15APP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 73 / Friday, April 15, 2011 / Proposed Rules 21273 Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Committee (RACNAC) and public risk from wildfire to a municipal water 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and comment on the 2008 Proposed Rule supply system. The 2001 Rule exception 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday both provided a national perspective. for ecosystem maintenance and through Friday. The RACNAC was specifically designed restoration allows tree cutting anywhere SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: as an advisory committee composed of within roadless areas. national interests to provide a national In the proposed rule, an upper tier of Background perspective, and it no longer exists. The protection has been designated with As a leader in natural resource vast majority of respondents to the 2008 fewer exceptions than the 2001 Rule for conservation, the Forest Service Proposed Rule expressed a desire for a road construction and reconstruction provides direction for the management rule that protects roadless area and tree cutting. Exceptions are not and use of the Nation’s forests, characteristics now and for future allowed for road reconstruction and rangeland, and aquatic ecosystems generations. However, some realignment, and temporary roads for under its jurisdiction. Similarly, the respondents suggested alternative, less public health and safety. The 2001 Rule State of Colorado is committed to restrictive roadless regulations. This tree-cutting exceptions for maintenance sustained natural resource use and proposed rule includes prohibitions on and restoration of ecosystem conservation of State and Federal land tree-cutting, sale, or removal; road characteristics, and for habitat within its borders. Furthermore, the construction/reconstruction; and linear improvement for endangered, Forest Service is charged to collaborate construction zones, all with limited threatened or sensitive species are not cooperatively with States and other exceptions tailored to address specific allowed in the upper tier of the interested parties regarding the use and issues. This proposed rule requires, in proposed rule. management of the National Forest many cases, the Regional Forester to State of Colorado Petitions System (NFS). make specific determinations prior to Colorado’s Roadless Areas are of great authorizing exceptions. On July 14, 2005, the State of importance to the people of Colorado
Recommended publications
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Assessment of the Uncompahgre River Basin
    The Uncompahgre River Basin A Natural Heritage Assessment Volume I Prepared for Valley Land Conservancy Montrose, Colorado March, 1999 By Peggy Lyon, Tom Stephens, Jeremy Siemers, Denise Culver, Phyllis Pineda, and Jennifer Zoerner Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523 User’s Guide The Uncompahgre Basin Biological Assessment conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Volume I presents all potential conservation sites that have been identified in the Uncompahgre Basin that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas. Volume II focuses exclusively on wetland and riparian areas. Volume II also presents “locally significant areas.” These are sites that are among the most important wetlands in the Uncompahgre Basin, but they are not unique from a national or statewide perspective, and therefore these sites did not receive a Biodiversity Rank. Additionally, Volume II presents an assessment of the wetland functions performed by each site that was surveyed. These functional assessments are intended to provide the user with a more complete picture of the value wetlands and riparian areas provide to Uncompahgre Basin residents. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage Methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s List of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead-Deerlodge
    These acres were calculated from GIS data Available on the Forest Service Roadless website for the 2001 Roadless EIS. The data was downloaded on 8/24/2011 by Suzanne Johnson WO Minerals & Geology‐ GIS/Database Specialist. It was discovered that the Santa Fe NF in NM has errors. This spreadsheet holds the corrected data from the Santa Fe NF. The GIS data was downloaded from the eGIS data center SDE instance on 8/25/2011 Region Forest Roadless Name GIS Acres 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Anderson Mountain 31,500.98 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Basin Creek 9,499.51 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Bear Creek 8,122.88 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Beaver Lake 11,862.81 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Big Horn Mountain 50,845.85 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Black Butte 39,160.06 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Call Mountain 8,795.54 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cattle Gulch 19,390.45 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Cherry Lakes 19,945.49 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Dixon Mountain 3,674.46 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge East Pioneer 145,082.05 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Electric Peak 17,997.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Emerine 14,282.26 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fleecer 31,585.50 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Flint Range / Dolus Lakes 59,213.30 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Four Eyes Canyon 7,029.38 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Fred Burr 5,814.01 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Freezeout Mountain 97,304.68 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Garfield Mountain 41,891.22 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Goat Mountain 9,347.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Granulated Mountain 14,950.11 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Highlands 20,043.87 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Italian Peak 90,401.31 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Lone Butte 13,725.16 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Mckenzie Canyon 33,350.48 1 Beaverhead‐Deerlodge Middle Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS in COLORADO, Proposed Rule
    ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis USDA Forest Service July 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................25 PURPOSE AND NEED.............................................................................................................................................26 PROPOSED RULE AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................28 ROADLESS AREA BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................................................28 ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................................................................31 IMPLICATIONS OF RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND FEDERAL DIRECTION (DONE) ..............38 METHODOLOGY, DATA, AND ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................41 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................41 Benefits and Costs..............................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 NPSNM Annual Conference, Flora of the High San Juans July 16-19, Durango
    2015 NPSNM Annual Conference, Flora of the High San Juans July 16-19, Durango Whether you are old, wise, and leaning on FRIDAY TRIPS Duration of Meeting Miles of a cane or young, learning, and in new Trip Time a.m. Walking hiking boots; whether you are an avid 1 *Alpine Placer Gulch All day 6:30 1 botanist or budding wildflower lover; 2 *Alpine Sharkstooth All day 7:00 4 whether you like minute details or the 3 *Alpine Colorado Trail All day 7:30 0+ broad sweep of things, we have field trips 4 *Alpine U.S. Basin All day 7:30 1 for you in the lush San Juan Mountains 5 Alpine Pass Creek All day 7:30 4 surrounding Durango. 6 Lizard Head Meadow All day 7:00 1+ 7 La Plata Ethnobotany All day 8:00 0+ Some field trips have little or no walking 8 Southwest Seeds All day 8:00 0 and some have miles of walking; some 9 Chattanooga Iron Fen All day 8:00 ½ - 2 trips are all day and some are half day. 10 Old Growth Forests All day 8:30 2½ Some trips are about botanical education; 11 Edible Plants Morning 8:00 ½ - 1 some are about tasting wild plants; some 12 Mesa Verde Morn/All day 8:00 0 are about keying out plants; all are about 13 Durango Gardens Morning 8:30 0 bringing you to the beauty of San Juan 6:00-7:30 p.m. Botanical illustrations & 7:30 p.m. John Kartesz Duration of Meeting Miles of flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Roadless Areas
    MAP 3 MAP 3 Colorado Roadless Areas CRA acres 135 Kreutzer-Princeton 43,300 255 Blackhawk Mountain 17,500 Rounded 232 Colorado Roadless Area Names 136 Little Fountain Creek 7,700 256 East Animas 16,900 233 to nearest Platte River 100 acres 137 Lost Creek East 14,900 257 Fish Creek 13,500 Wilderness Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 4 138 Lost Creek South 5,900 258 Florida River 5,700 246 236 1 Bard Creek 22,800 139 Lost Creek West 14,400 259 Graham Park 17,800 23 2 Byers Peak 10,200 ** Map Key ** 140 Methodist Mountain 6,900 260 HD Mountains 25,000 248 232 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Area 3,000 226 243 Mount 141 Mount Antero 38,700 261 Hermosa 148,100 234 4 Cherokee Park 7,600 Major Roads Zirkel 21 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 44,200 142 Mount Elbert 22,100 262 Lizard Head Adjacent 5,800 Wilderness 23 249 244 6 Copper Mountain 13,200 143 Mount Evans 15,400 263 Piedra Area Adjacent 40,800 247 236 Rawah 25 76 10 7 Crosier Mountain 7,300 144 Mount Massive 1,400 Wilderness 264 Runlett Park 5,600 9 8 Gold Run 6,600 Colorado Roadless Areas 11 145 Pikes Peak East 13,700 265 Ryman 8,700 235 5 3 9 Green Ridge -East 26,600 146 Pikes Peak West 13,900 266 San Miguel 64,100 C3ache La Poudre 10 Green Ridge -West 13,700 5 3 Wilderness 147 Porphyry Peak 3,900 253 5 11 Grey Rock 12,100 267 South San Juan Adjacent 34,900 National Forest System Wilderness & 5 Comanche Peak 27 148 Puma Hills 8,800 268 Storm Peak 57,600 239 23 Wilderness 12 Hell Canyon 5,800 230 5 13 Indian Peaks Adjacent Areas 28,600 149 Purgatoire 16,800 269 Treasure Mountain 22,500 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Topographic Maps, Scale 1:24,000 This List Contains The
    Colorado Topographic Maps, scale 1:24,000 This list contains the quadrangle names and publication dates of all Colorado topographic maps published at the scale of 1:24,000 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). One, non-circulating copy of each map is held in the Map Room Office. The Library does not own maps labeled "lacking." The maps are sorted alphabetically by sheet name. Colorado 1:24,000 Topos -- A Abarr 1974 printed 1977 Abarr SE 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Abeyta 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Adams Lake 1974 printed 1978 (dark), 1978 (light) 1974 (without color) printed 1978 1987 printed 1988 Adena 1963 printed 1965, 1975 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1984 printed 1984 1984 (without color) printed 1984 Adler Creek 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Adobe Downs Ranch, New Mexico-Colorado 1963 printed 1965 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1979 printed 1980 (dark), 1980 (light) Adobe Springs 1969 printed 1972, 1992 1969 (without color) printed 1972 Agate 1970 printed 1973 (dark), 1973 (light) 1970 (without color) printed 1973 Agate Mountain 1983 printed 1983 1994 printed 1998 Aguilar 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Akron 1973 printed 1976 1973 (without color) printed 1976 Akron SE 1973 printed 1976 Akron SW 1973 printed 1976 Alamosa East 1966 printed 1968, 1975 1966 (without color) printed 1968 Alamosa West 1966 printed 1969, 1971 1966 (without color) printed 1969 Aldrich Gulch 1957 printed 1958, 1964, 1975 (dark), 1975 (light) 1957 (without color)
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of the Geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to March 1, 1 973
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 675 Bibliography of the Geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to March 1, 1 973 Bibliography of the Geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to March 1 , 1 973 By Mariorie C. Mullens G E 0 L 0 G I C A L 5 U R V E Y C I R C U LA R 675 Washington 1973 United States Department of the Interior ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary Geological Survey V. E. McKelvey, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 CONTENTS Page Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 U.S. Geological Survey reports on the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and VVyoming -------------------------------------------------------- 1 Reports by U.S. Geological Survey authors on geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and VVyoming, in non-U.S. Geological Survey publications --------------------------------------------------------- 6 Selected reports by non-U.S. Geological Survey authors on geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and VVyoming ----------------- 10 III Bibliography of the Geology of the Green River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, to March 1, 1973 By Marjorie C. Mullens INTRODUCTION The bibliography is arranged in thre~~ parts: U.S. Geological Survey reports on the Green The Green River Formation in northwestern River Formation, Colorado, Utah, and Wyo­ Colorado, northeastern Utah, and southwestern ming; reports by U.S. Geological Survey au­ Wyoming contains thick and extensive deposits thors on geology of the Green River Formation, of oil shale. The richest oil-shale deposits under­ Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, in non-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds
    Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds EUGENE H. SCHMITZ • Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 61(4424-446. 1959 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Ind. Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds' EUGENE H. SCHMITZ University of Colorado, Boulder The rugged terrain and the rigorous climatic conditions of the alpine tundra present a rather formidable picture to the field biologist. The long winter, deep snow, blizzards, and high winds make the alpine tundra relatively inaccessible for biological studies with ordinary equipment during much of the year. Even in the short summer, high winds, frequent cold showers, and summer blizzards are likely to occur at any time. It has long been generally recognized that such severe climatic conditions are remarkably restrictive upon the aquatic as well as the terrestrial biota of the tundra. With the exception of Neldner and Pennak (1955), who conducted a full open season study on a single Colorado alpine pond, the Amer- ican literature on tundra ponds is almost non-existent, being limited to brief descriptions, single visits, and casual observations. European investigators, such as Brink and Wingstrand (1949), Pesta (1933, 1935, 1943, 1948), Pichler (1939a, 1939b) , Stirnimann (1926), Thomasson (1951, 1952), and Turnowsky (1946), have produced a much more extensive array of literature, but like the majority of Amer- ican papers, these are brief descriptions and not full seasonal studies. It is the purpose of the present paper to give a limnological description of two small Colorado alpine tundra ponds, based upon observations and data gathered at relatively frequent intervals during the entire open season.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Teton National Park
    GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK • WTO MING * UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIO NAL PARK SERVICE Grand Teton [WYOMING] National Park United States Department of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Arno B. Cammerer, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1936 Rules and Regulations -I-HE PARK regulations are designed for the protection of the natural Contents beauties as well as for the comfort and convenience of visitors. The follow­ ing synopsis is for the general guidance of visitors, who are requested to assist in the administration of the park by observing them. Copies of the complete rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior Page for the government of the park may be obtained at the office of the super­ History of the Region 3 intendent and at other points of concentration throughout the park. Geographic Features 7 The destruction, injury, defacement, or disturbance of any buildings, Teton Range 7 signs, equipment, trees, flowers, vegetation, rocks, minerals, animal, bird, Jackson Hole 9 or other life is prohibited. The Work of Glaciers 9 Camps must be kept clean. Rubbish and garbage should be burned. Trails 13 Refuse should be placed in cans provided for this purpose. If no cans are Mountain Climbing 14 provided where camp is made, refuse should be buried. Wildlife 18 Do not throw paper, lunch refuse, or other trash on the roads and trails. Trees and Plants 21 Carry until the same can be burned in camp or placed in receptacle. Naturalist Service 23 Fires shall be lighted only when necessary and when no longer needed Fishing 24 shall be completely extinguished.
    [Show full text]