COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the Sta.Te H Istorical Society of Colorado VOL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the Sta.Te H Istorical Society of Colorado VOL THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by The Sta.te H istorical Society of Colorado VOL. V Denver, Colorado, June, 1928 No. 3 The Hatcher Ditch (1846-1928) The Oldest Colorado Irrigation Ditch Now in Use By ..A. W. McHendrie* While it is probable there were irrigating ditches constructed and in use within the present boundaries of the state of Colo­ rado nearly, if not quite, a century prior to this year of our Lord, 1928, none of them are in existence today, nor have they been in use within the memory of any man now living. Priority number one for the right to beneficially use the waters of a natural stream in this state for irrigation purposes has been awarded to, and is still in use by, a ditch located on the Culebra, a tributary to the Rio Grande River, in Costilla County. The beginning of the construction of this ditch, known as ''The San Luis People's Ditch," was ..April 10, 1852, and the ditch has an officially recorded priority as of that date.1 While this ditch is probably entitled to the distinction of being the oldest ditch in Colorado continuously in operation from the date of its construction, nevertheless there is in existence another ditch, the history of which begins about five and a half years earlier and which, ·with a comparatively brief interrup­ tion, has continuously carried water from the stream from which it derives its supply and delivered it to and made fruitful the very tract of land the reclamation of which was the object of its original construction, begun in the latter part of September or the early part of October, 1846. I refer to what was originally known as "The Hatcher Ditch": later known as "The Lewelling Ditch"; and still later known as ''The Lewelling-McCormick Consolidated Ditch.'' This ditch is located on, and draws its water supply from, the Purgatoire or Las Animas River in Las ..Animas County, Colorado, approximately twenty miles down the river from the city of Trinidad. Technically, perhaps, this ditch is not entitled to an official record of a priority as of the date of its construc­ tion, yet it would seem to be worthy of some recognition as the • Judge McHendrie, a prominent attorney of Trinidad, contributed an article on the "Origin of the Name of the Purgatoire River" to our Colorado llfagazine or February last.-Ed. 1 See Stale Historical Society's History of Colorado, Volume 2, page 589, "Irrigation," by Daniel W. Working. 82 THE COLORADO MAGAZINE THE HATCHER DITCH (1846-1928) 83 pioneer in the wonderful development of our agricultural re­ sources made possible by the irrigation of an otherwise barren and fruitleRs region. A fairly complete, and certainly interesting, record of the beginning and practically continuous use of this ditch is pre­ served by the -well authenticated statements of contemporaneous writers and deponents, some of which are preserved by official records. 0 This ditch waH built by one John Hatcher, apparently a quite a· remarkable trapper, Indian fighter, trader, mountaineer and ....'- plainsman, whose active and eventful career in southern Colorado z and northern ;\e"· 1\Iexico in the first half of the nineteenth .,. <Z "· century Heems not to have attracted any marked attention from Y.- ~" historianH and authors writing of that period and of the lives of his contemporaries and associates. Hatcher lived and worked ~ ¥ 0 with and for Kit Carson, the Bent Brothers, Jim Beckworth, St. 2 -"~ ~ g ..;; <. Vrain, Lucien B. :Jlaxwell and others of that time, famed in story ;., 0 "" :::: and legend. Hatcher was probably the peer of those much better ;i:: '-' ::::: ":':l z"' known frontiersmen. At any rate, Lewis B. Garrard, a young .... '-- '· 0 man " ·ho kept a journal of his life of nearly a year from the '" Y. fall of 1846, spent in the vicinity of old Fort Bent, on the Purga­ 2 '" ~ ;;;"' toire River and at 'l'aos, among the Indians, traders, trappers and -::: - - ~ mountainrers of that rrgion, devotes more space in his jo11rnal to .... :::> ~ .... ·-3 the career and achievements of Hatcher than to any one or all of ~ :l ·- the men prominent in that day and time-with all of whom · ~ - 'f. Garrard came into rather intimate contact. Among the many -~ iJ [:;:"' referrnces to Hatcher found in the pages of the book which Gar­ ~.,. -5"' rard compiled from his journal, Wah-To-l'ah and The Taos Trail, % ::; ~ we find this description (page 215 ) : [:;: ·-::: ~ "Hatcher was always full of stories of an amusing, serious, ~ ;; and often marvelous cast, and we easily persuaded him to re­ .... .:;" '.I) count a few scenes in his wayward, everchanging life. Though :;j .,, he frequently indulged in rough slang, he did not partake of the " Westerner's unsubdued nature altogether. I have chosen to ~ select the more strange part of his conversations, as being the more strikingly illustratiYe of mountain character. He at times, for his own as well as our, amusement, would yarn in the most approved voya.ge1ler's style, or tell the hardest story of sights within his range. In short, Hatcher was aii f ait in everything appertaining to the Far West; whether mimicking a Canadian Frenchman; cowing down a score of Mexicans in a fandango row; 'lifting' the 'hair' of a Pawnee ; playing poker for beaver at rendezvous, or trading a robe, or sitting with grave face in an Indian council, to smoke the long pipe and discuss with the 84 THE COLORADO MAGAZINE! THE HATCHER DITCH (1846-1928) 85 aborigines the many grievances to which they consider themselves wards established by the surveys and records hereinafter referred subject by the innovations of the whites. '' to, is in the southeast quarter of section twenty-one and the Garrard spent a considerable portion of his time in hunting northeast quarter of section twenty-eight, township thirty-t"-o. with the famous white and Indian hunters of that region and south, range sixty-one west of the sixth P. l\L , Las Animas saw and relates many tales of their prowess with the rifle. He County, Colorado. Traveling with ox wagons, it probably took says of Hatcher (page 239) : Hatcher from ten days to two weeks to reach his destination. "His was a short, heavy rifle, the stock unvarnished; and, The construction of the ditch must have been commenced when he brought it to his face, the game most always came. He immediately and carried on with reasonable diligence that fall, was the best shot within my knowledge. '' as there w~s about a mile and a half of the ditch completed by At the time of the construction of the ditch which is the the next spring and there was apparently no work done during subject of this article, and for a long time prior thereto, Hatcher the winter, as will be discussed later. was and had been in the employ of Bent. St. Vrain & Company, The headgatc of the ditch was located, as fixed by the official then maintaining Fort \Villiam, or Old Bents Fort, on the north records hereina bove referred to, at a point at or very near the bank of the Arkansas River, seven or eight miles below the present southwest corner of the northwest quarter of the southwest quar­ town of La Junta, as a trading post. The company was also ter of section sixteen. township thirty-two, range sixty-one. From engaged in ranching and live-stock raising on ranches located that point the ditch ran in a generally southeasterly direction, on the Cimarron, Vermejo and Ponil Creeks in northern New paralleling the general course of the river, for a distance of ap­ Mexico. Hatcher was one of Bent's best traders and at one time proximately a mile aud a half and terminated by wasting its was foreman at Bents Old Fort. 2 return waters into the river at a point approximately one-eight In the summer of 1846, Bent, St. Vrain & Company conceived of a mile south of the northeast corner of section twenty-eight, the idea of initiating ranch operations on the Purgatoire River. of the a boYe township and range. The location of the headgate For some reason it was deemed desirable to locate this ranch ap­ was about half a mile above the ford or crossing of the Purgatoire proximately midway between Bents Fort and the ranches of the River by the Santa Fe Trail from Bents Old }j'ort, then known company in northern New Mexico. The commonly accepted rea­ as the Bents Fort 'frail or the Mountain Trail, and later as the son for selecting this particular location, among the old settlers Army or :Military 'l'rail. This crossing was the ford used by on the Purgatoire, was that it was part of a colonization program Kearny 's Army of the West in the early part of August, 1846, which St. Vrain and Bent desired to put into operation on the on his expedition to Santa Fe.4 'fhis ford was later known as Vigil and St. Vrain grant, in which Charles Bent had obtained the "Fisher Crossing" by reason of the fact that a man by the an interest. It is said that the reason Hatcher finally abandoned name of Fisher occupied the land immediately below and ad­ the ranch, as hereinafter set forth, was because his superiors dis­ jacent to the ford under a ''squatter's'' right or claim. 5 Garrard covered that this spot was not within the confines of that grant. refers to the location of the Bent farm as being "in the Purga­ However that may be, Hatcher left Taos in September, 1846, toire Yalley, below the crossing of the Santa Fe Trail." (Page with three wagons, sixteen yoke of oxen and fifteen or sixteen 238.) Mexican laborers for the Purgatoire River to make a settlement.
Recommended publications
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Thomas O. Boggs December 2012 Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Background his reconnaissance study was prepared by the National Park Service (NPS) at T the request of U.S. Representative Cory Gardner (CO), who asked the NPS to evaluate Boggsville, Colorado, as a potential new unit of the park service.1 Boggsville, which is in Bent County, Colorado, is a 39-acre historic district that was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986; that nomination determined that Boggsville had a state level of significance. The purpose of the NPS reconnaissance study was to determine if Boggsville also met NPS criteria for national significance. If deemed nationally significant, Boggsville could then be further considered as a National Historic Landmark, or as a potential unit of the NPS. The primary contributing buildings at Boggsville include the Thomas O. Boggs home and the John W. Prowers house. The Pioneer Historical Society of Bent County acquired Boggsville in 1985. The site consists of 110 acres of land, of which 39 acres are associated with the Boggsville settlement. Thomas Boggs Home - NPS Photo, Greg Kendrick The history and evaluation of national significance was prepared by historian and PhD candidate Steven C. Baker, under the supervision of Dr. Ralph Mann, associate professor, Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder, working in cooperation with the Heritage Partnerships Program of the NPS Intermountain Region. 1 Cory Gardner, Member of Congress, House of Representatives, letter to Jon Jarvis, Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS in COLORADO, Proposed Rule
    ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis USDA Forest Service July 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................25 PURPOSE AND NEED.............................................................................................................................................26 PROPOSED RULE AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................28 ROADLESS AREA BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................................................28 ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................................................................31 IMPLICATIONS OF RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND FEDERAL DIRECTION (DONE) ..............38 METHODOLOGY, DATA, AND ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................41 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................41 Benefits and Costs..............................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Roadless Areas
    MAP 3 MAP 3 Colorado Roadless Areas CRA acres 135 Kreutzer-Princeton 43,300 255 Blackhawk Mountain 17,500 Rounded 232 Colorado Roadless Area Names 136 Little Fountain Creek 7,700 256 East Animas 16,900 233 to nearest Platte River 100 acres 137 Lost Creek East 14,900 257 Fish Creek 13,500 Wilderness Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 4 138 Lost Creek South 5,900 258 Florida River 5,700 246 236 1 Bard Creek 22,800 139 Lost Creek West 14,400 259 Graham Park 17,800 23 2 Byers Peak 10,200 ** Map Key ** 140 Methodist Mountain 6,900 260 HD Mountains 25,000 248 232 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Area 3,000 226 243 Mount 141 Mount Antero 38,700 261 Hermosa 148,100 234 4 Cherokee Park 7,600 Major Roads Zirkel 21 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 44,200 142 Mount Elbert 22,100 262 Lizard Head Adjacent 5,800 Wilderness 23 249 244 6 Copper Mountain 13,200 143 Mount Evans 15,400 263 Piedra Area Adjacent 40,800 247 236 Rawah 25 76 10 7 Crosier Mountain 7,300 144 Mount Massive 1,400 Wilderness 264 Runlett Park 5,600 9 8 Gold Run 6,600 Colorado Roadless Areas 11 145 Pikes Peak East 13,700 265 Ryman 8,700 235 5 3 9 Green Ridge -East 26,600 146 Pikes Peak West 13,900 266 San Miguel 64,100 C3ache La Poudre 10 Green Ridge -West 13,700 5 3 Wilderness 147 Porphyry Peak 3,900 253 5 11 Grey Rock 12,100 267 South San Juan Adjacent 34,900 National Forest System Wilderness & 5 Comanche Peak 27 148 Puma Hills 8,800 268 Storm Peak 57,600 239 23 Wilderness 12 Hell Canyon 5,800 230 5 13 Indian Peaks Adjacent Areas 28,600 149 Purgatoire 16,800 269 Treasure Mountain 22,500 Other
    [Show full text]
  • Paper FIRM Conversion Bent County Hydrology Report
    CHAMP Phase III, Bent County, Colorado Hydrologic Analyses Report CWCB CONTRACT # CT PDAA 2017-3860 November 30, 2017 Submitted by: Amec Foster Wheeler Colorado Center Tower II 2000 South Colorado Blvd., Suite 200 Denver, CO 80222 USA Page i List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Existing Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 3 Flood Insurance Study .................................................................................................................. 3 Letters of Map Amendment ............................................................................................................ 3 Proposed Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 3 Method Selection ......................................................................................................................... 3 Bulletin 17C Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 USGS Qualification Codes ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds
    Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds EUGENE H. SCHMITZ • Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 61(4424-446. 1959 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Ind. Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds' EUGENE H. SCHMITZ University of Colorado, Boulder The rugged terrain and the rigorous climatic conditions of the alpine tundra present a rather formidable picture to the field biologist. The long winter, deep snow, blizzards, and high winds make the alpine tundra relatively inaccessible for biological studies with ordinary equipment during much of the year. Even in the short summer, high winds, frequent cold showers, and summer blizzards are likely to occur at any time. It has long been generally recognized that such severe climatic conditions are remarkably restrictive upon the aquatic as well as the terrestrial biota of the tundra. With the exception of Neldner and Pennak (1955), who conducted a full open season study on a single Colorado alpine pond, the Amer- ican literature on tundra ponds is almost non-existent, being limited to brief descriptions, single visits, and casual observations. European investigators, such as Brink and Wingstrand (1949), Pesta (1933, 1935, 1943, 1948), Pichler (1939a, 1939b) , Stirnimann (1926), Thomasson (1951, 1952), and Turnowsky (1946), have produced a much more extensive array of literature, but like the majority of Amer- ican papers, these are brief descriptions and not full seasonal studies. It is the purpose of the present paper to give a limnological description of two small Colorado alpine tundra ponds, based upon observations and data gathered at relatively frequent intervals during the entire open season.
    [Show full text]
  • C Lear Creek GIS C Ounty
    Creek G ilpin C o unty D D D 12147 D Jefferson County G ty Gilpin County rand Coun ICE LAKE D OHMAN LAKE STEUART LAKE D D REYNOLDS LAKE D D 13391 LAKE CAROLINELOCH LOMAND ST MARYS GLACIER Fox Mountain ST MARYS DLAKE FALL RIVER SILVER LAKE D D LAKE QUIVIRA 11239 13130 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR SLATER LAKE D SILVER CREEK SHERWIN LAKECHINNS LAKE Witter Peak D D 12884 D D James Peak Wilderness MEXICAN GULCH D ETHEL LAKEBYRON LAKE D D BILL MOORE LAKE HAMLIN GULCH D D 13132 CUMBERLAND GULCH D MILL CREEK D D Russell Peak Breckinridge Peak Berthoud Pass D D 12889 G D D ilp D in D C D ou n ty D Grand C D D ounty D MAD CREEK LION CREEK D Stanley Mountain YORK GULCH D D FALL RIVER 12521 BLUE CREEK Cone Mountain D D HOOP CREEK 12244 SPRING GULCH Red Elephant Hill D 10316 D ¤£US 40 D CLEAR CREEK This map is visual representation only, do not use Bellevue Mountain URAD RESERVOIR (LOWER) for legal purposes. Map is not survey accurate and ¨¦§I 70 D WEST FORK CLEAR CREEK 9863 Seaton Mountain may not comply with National Mapping Accuracy Red Mountain D D GUANELLA RESERVOIR 9105 12315 EMPIRE n County Standards. Map is based on best available data as Gilpi RUBY CREEK Ball Mountain Douglas Mountain of October, 2018 . BUTLER GULCH CENTRAL CITY D D VIRGINIA CANYON Lincoln Mountain GEORGIA GULCH 12529 9550 OHIO GULCH WOODS CREEK D GILSON GULCH Engelmann Peak 10363 TURKEY GULCH D IDAHO HASSELL LAKEURAD RESERVOIR (UPPER) 13362 BARD CREEK LAKE SILVER CREEK TRAIL CREEK J e US 6 f f ¤£ e r s o BARD CREEK SPRINGS n Flirtation Peak C Robeson Peak Columbia Mountain o ty
    [Show full text]
  • Fsm91 058053.Pdf
    PURPOSE The purposes of ths appendix are to 1) complement information contamed on the evaluation described in Chapter Three, Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences, Roadless Areas, 2) provide a summary of the evaluahon for each roadless area (RA), and 3) provide information on the Roadless Area Review and Evaluahon of 1979 (RARE n) INTRODUCTION Chapter Three provides 1 a legal framework for the RA analysis and evaluation, 2. a descripaon of the process, 3 a table of the RAs analyzed, 4 a table of the evaluation of each RA, and 5. the environmental consequences of the management area allocahons by alternative, based on the Need Assessment analysis. This appendix provides 1 a table of the RAs analyzed for reference, 2 the guidelines used by the Ranger Districts to evaluate roadless areas and determinahons for recommendations for designation, 3 the guidelines used for the detaled analysis and narrative for each RA, 4 the narrative for the James Peak RA, as an example, 5 summary tables of the detaled narratives for each RA, 6 the management area allocations by altemahve for all RAs, and 7 a summary of the RAs considered in the RARE 11 analysis. The detaded narrauves for the individual RAs are part of the Admnistrative Record. ROADLESS AREAS ANALYZED The Revision evaluates 330,230 acres in 38 Roadless Areas (RA), 34 percent of the non- wilderness Forest, for possible recommendations to Congress for designation, as shown below Appendax C I Inventory and Evaluation of Roadless Areas Table C.l Roadless Areas Evaluated in the Revision.
    [Show full text]
  • We've Got This
    ENGLEWOOD SUMMER 2020 | CITY MAGAZINE & RECREATION GUIDE CITIZEN WE’VE GOT THIS. Community and Business Response to COVID-19 Englewoodco.gov/recovery Due to COVID-19, events or programs may be canceled or postponed and may require social distancing practices. 1 12 44 11 14 24 36 Contents Recreation General Facility Information Aquatics / Water Fitness Adult Athletics 4 Mayor’s Message 8 “Flow it Forward,” Englewood 15 City News 22 32 44 Hear from Mayor Linda Olson 10 Englewood’s Proactive 23 Englewood Recreation Center 34 Swimming Lessons 45 Adult Fitness 5 Council’s Corner Response to COVID-19 Community Highlights Mayor Pro Tem Sierra and 16 Council Member Russell 24 Malley Recreation Center 36 Pirates Cove 48 Active Adult Fitness 11 Local Business Spotlight Grow + Gather 6 Planning for Englewood’s Future 18 Get Involved 26 Englewood Library 38 Cultural, Enrichment & 50 Yoga & Tai Chi City Council’s Strategic Plan Education Programs Creating a Sense of Place 12 Englewood Public Library Central Business District Turns 100 29 Computer / Tech Classes 52 Pilates Improvements Since 1920, the library has never 19 Parks at a Glance 41 Youth Athletics lost sight of its mission Facility Listing for City Parks 30 Broken Tee Golf Course 54 Excursions / Extended Travel 7 Community Connections 42 Active Kids Keeping Residents Connected Get Out and Explore 14 Fun for Everyone 20 Your Guide to City parks Mark your calendar for 31 Outdoor / Hiking 57 Special Events summer events 2 3 LINDA OLSON OTHONIEL SIERRA RITA RUSSELL MAYOR OF MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBER, MEETCOUNCIL'S YOUR NEIGHBORS CORNER ENGLEWOOD DISTRICT 1 AT LARGE This issue of the Englewood Citizen magazine contains The suddenness of the COVID-19 These past couple of months important City information and responses to assist pandemic has impacted every have been a very harrowing businesses and residents in this very difficult time with household, every business, and time for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on November 7, 2013 Field Guides Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Field Guides 2013;33;269-278 doi: 10.1130/2013.0033(10) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2013 Geological Society of America The Geological Society of America 18888 201320 Field Guide 33 2013 CELEBRATING ADVANCES IN GEOSCIENCE Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Western Interior Paleontological Society, P.O.
    [Show full text]