DOCSLIB.ORG

Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison and Woodruff, P. C. M. E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

• MOSES, WITTEMYER, HARRISON AND WOODRUFF, P. C. LAW OFFICES 1002 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 300 RAPHAEL .J. MOSES BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 HUNTLEY STONE SPECIAL COUNSEL JOHN WITTEmYER TELEPHONE:(3031443-8782 COUNSEL MONTANA COUNSEL (303) 443-8796 TCLECOP1ER: MATTHEW W. WILLIAMS DAVID L. HARRISON 506 EAST BABCOCK STREET CHARLES N. WOODRUFF ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE TO: BOZEMAN, MONTANA 59715 ROBERT E. L. BEEBE P. 0. BOX 1440 (406) 586-1373 DAVID N. BROWN BOULDER. CO 80306-1440 JAMES R. MONTGOMERY VERONICA A. SPERLING J. DUBOIS JAMES July 28, 1988 M. E. MacDougall, Esq. 530 South Nevada • Colorado Springs, CO 80903 Mary M. Hammond, Esq. 1700 Lincoln Street, 42750 Denver, CO 80203 Dennis M. Montgomery, Esq. 100 Blake Street Building 1441 Eighteenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Howard Holme, Esq. One United Bank Center 1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2400 Denver, CO 80203 Rexford L. Mitchell, Esq. 512 North Main Street Rocky Ford, CO 81067 Carmel A. Garlutzo, Esq. 314 West Main Trinidad, CO 81082 RE: Applications for Change of Water Rights of the City of Trinidad Dear Counsel: Enclosed for your information are copies of two applications which we have filed on behalf' of the City of Trinidad. The first is to change certain rights owned by the Corps of Engineers to storage in the permanent pool of Trinidad Reservoir. The second is a change of certain Johns Flood Ditch rights owned by Trinidad to storage in Trinidad Reservoir for an municipal, industrial and other purposes. July 28, 1988 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding either application, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, MOSES, WITTEMYER, HARRISON AND WOODRUFF, P.C. Janksil DuBois JDB:rlo Enclosures • DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 2, STATE OF COLORADO Case No. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS 'IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF THE CITY OF TRINIDAD IN LAS ANIMAS COUNTY 1. Name, address and telephone number of applicant: City of Trinidad, a municipal corporation 135 North Animas Street Trinidad, Colorado 81082 (719) 846-9843 Mailing address: c/o Moses, Wittemyer, Harrison and Woodruff, P.C. P. 0. Box 1440 Boulder, Colorado 80306 (303) 443-8782 2. Decreed name of structures for which change is sought and information from previous decrees: A. Direct Flow Water Rights Owned by the City of Trinidad: .(1) Name of structure: Johns Flood Ditch. (2) Date of previous decrees: District Original Priority Priority Decree No. 19 Date Date 5 3/20/1862 8/10/1903 9 1/01/1863 8/10/1903 15 4/10/1864 8/10/1903 20 10/07/1865 8/10/1903 27 5/31/1866 8/10/1903 145 10/20/1902 1/12/1925 (3) Decreed point of diversion: The headgate of the Johns Flood Ditch is located on the north bank of the Las Animas River, also known as the Purgato4,re River, at a point which is South 63° West 967 feet, from the Northwest Corner of the NEI of City of Trinidad Case No. Page 2 the SW I of Section 27, Township 32 South, Range 63 West, of the 6th P.M. The actual point of diver- sion is at the headgate of the Model Canal located on the north bank of the Purgatoire River at a point which is N53°W, 5780 feet from the SE corner of Section 33, T32S, R63W of the 6th P.M. (4) Source: Purgatoire River, also known as Las Animas River. (5) Historical use: Irrigation. In addition, these rights are decreed for winter storage as part of the rights controlled by the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District and governed by the ruling in Civil Action No. 19793 in the District Court, Las Animas County, the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District Operating Criteria, the. Trinidad Dam and Reservoir Project Operating Principles, House Document 325, P.L. 85-500, 85th Cong., and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District v. Kuiper, 593 P.2d 333 (1979). A map showing the approximate location of historic use and summaries of diversion records are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (6) Remarks: Trinidad is the owner of 242 shares out of the 400 outstanding shares in Johns Flood Ditch Company. The water rights owned by the Johns Flood Ditch Company divert out of the Purgatoire River at the Johns Flood Ditch Company headgate. The appropriation date and date of original decree for these rights are set out above and are further described as follows: Las Animas Trinidad (Purgatoire) Pro Rata District 19 River Amount Share Priority No. Priority No. (c.f.s.) (c.f.s.) 9 9 1.28 .77 15 15 3.42 2.07 20 19 4.95 2.99 27 23 2.25 1.36 145 100.00 60.50 City of Trinidad Case No. Page 3 Trinidad is also the owner of 2.0 c.f.s. of Priority No. 5 on the Las Animas River and in Water District 19.- This right was originally decreed to the Leitensdorfer Irrigating Ditch for 4.0 c.f.s. with the appropriation and decree dates noted herein. Trinidad acquired its 2.0 c.f.s. interest in Priority No. 5 through a Separation Agreement between the Model Land and Irrigation Company and Trinidad dated August 1, 1981. B. Trinidad Model Account Rights: • (1) Name of structure: Trinidad Reservoir/Model Reservoir. (2) Date of previous decrees: This storage right was originally decreed in Civil Action No. 6118 in the District Court, Las Animas County, on January 12, 1925. The right was subsequently transferred to Trinidad Reservoir in Civil Action No. 19793 on April 15, 1965, and is further governed by the Trinidad Irrigation Project Operating Principles. (3) Decreed point of diversion: Trinidad Reservoir. Trinidad Reservoir Dam is located in Section 27, T33S, R64W of the 6th P.M. (4) Source: Purgatoire River, also known as Las Animas River. (5) Historical use: Irrigation. A map showing the approximate location of historic use and a summary of diversion records are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. (6) Remarks: By virtue of the Separation Agreement dated August 1, 1981 between the Model Land and Reservoir Co. and the City of Trinidad, Trinidad is entitled to 500 acre-feet of the first 1200 acre-feet of water stored or storable in the "Model Account" in Trinidad Reservoir. The Model Account is defined in the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District Operating Criteria as "the quantity of water in storage within the mocii l space reservation which will be used for the exclusive diversion to Model lands". The Model City of Trinidad Case No. Page 4 Account waters are subject to operation in accordance with the benefits and limitations contained in the Operating Criteria, as they exist or are hereafter amended. 3. Proposed changes: A. Trinidad Direct Flow Water Rights: Trinidad requests the Court to enter a decree changing its direct flow rights as follows: (1) Change to add an alternate point of diversion: The point of diversion for all Trinidad water rights diverting through the Johns Flood Ditch and described in paragraph 2.A. above shall have as an alternate point of diversion the Trinidad Reser- voir which is located as described in paragraph 3 herein. (2) Storage: The water rights, to the extent not previously changed in Case No. 19793,- Las Animas District Court, will be changed from direct flow to direct flow and storage. (3) Change of Use: Trinidad requests the Court to enter a decree changing the decreed uses of Trinidad's direct flow water . rights from use for irrigation to use for irrigation, municipal, industrial, maintenance of the Trinidad Reservoir permanent pool, recreation and fish propagation. (4) Reuse to Extinction: Applicant will maintain dominion and control of all return flows resulting from the use of the water rights stored in Trinidad Reservoir pursuant to this ¶3.A., and shall have the right of reuse, successive use, and disposition by sale, exchange, or otherwise to extinction, of all such waters. City of Trinidad Case No. Page 5 (5) Terms and conditions: (a) Only that quantity of water which was histor- ically depleted from the flow of the• Purgatoire River will be stored or diverted at Trinidad Reservoir, estimated to be a maximum of 2600 AF/year, and an average of 2100 AF/year. (b) Storage will only-occur When the water rights described in 12.A. are in priority or when water is legally available from the District water supply in the operation of the Trinidad Project. (c) Trinidad will continue to bear its share of the ditch loss otherwise chargeable to carriage of its water rights in the Johns Flood Ditch for the benefit of the other shareholders. (d) Lands previously irrigated by the water rights described in ¶2.A. will be removed from irrigation during any season to the extent water will be diverted and stored in Trinidad Reservoir. B. Trinidad Model Account Rights: Trinidad requests the Court to enter a decree changing Trinidad's interest in 500 acre-feet per year out of the first 1200 acre-feet of water stored or storable in the Model Account in Trinidad Reservoir from use for irrigation to use for irrigation, municipal, industrial, maintenance of the permanent pool, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. (1) Trinidad's allocation of water under the Project shall be retained in Trinidad Reservoir and stored in the permanent pool or in a space reservation within the Project for the sole use and benefit of Trinidad. City of Trinidad Case No. Page 6 .5. Comments: In order to permanently effect the requested changes, the Trinidad Dam and Reservoir Project Operating Principles and the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District Operating Criteria will need to be amended.
Recommended publications
  • Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado

    Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Thomas O. Boggs December 2012 Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Background his reconnaissance study was prepared by the National Park Service (NPS) at T the request of U.S. Representative Cory Gardner (CO), who asked the NPS to evaluate Boggsville, Colorado, as a potential new unit of the park service.1 Boggsville, which is in Bent County, Colorado, is a 39-acre historic district that was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986; that nomination determined that Boggsville had a state level of significance. The purpose of the NPS reconnaissance study was to determine if Boggsville also met NPS criteria for national significance. If deemed nationally significant, Boggsville could then be further considered as a National Historic Landmark, or as a potential unit of the NPS. The primary contributing buildings at Boggsville include the Thomas O. Boggs home and the John W. Prowers house. The Pioneer Historical Society of Bent County acquired Boggsville in 1985. The site consists of 110 acres of land, of which 39 acres are associated with the Boggsville settlement. Thomas Boggs Home - NPS Photo, Greg Kendrick The history and evaluation of national significance was prepared by historian and PhD candidate Steven C. Baker, under the supervision of Dr. Ralph Mann, associate professor, Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder, working in cooperation with the Heritage Partnerships Program of the NPS Intermountain Region. 1 Cory Gardner, Member of Congress, House of Representatives, letter to Jon Jarvis, Director, U.S.
  • Paper FIRM Conversion Bent County Hydrology Report

    Paper FIRM Conversion Bent County Hydrology Report

    CHAMP Phase III, Bent County, Colorado Hydrologic Analyses Report CWCB CONTRACT # CT PDAA 2017-3860 November 30, 2017 Submitted by: Amec Foster Wheeler Colorado Center Tower II 2000 South Colorado Blvd., Suite 200 Denver, CO 80222 USA Page i List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Existing Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 3 Flood Insurance Study .................................................................................................................. 3 Letters of Map Amendment ............................................................................................................ 3 Proposed Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 3 Method Selection ......................................................................................................................... 3 Bulletin 17C Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 USGS Qualification Codes ............................................................................................................
  • Field Guides

    Field Guides

    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on November 7, 2013 Field Guides Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Field Guides 2013;33;269-278 doi: 10.1130/2013.0033(10) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2013 Geological Society of America The Geological Society of America 18888 201320 Field Guide 33 2013 CELEBRATING ADVANCES IN GEOSCIENCE Fossils and geology of the Greenhorn Cyclothem in the Comanche National Grassland, Colorado Steve Miller Western Interior Paleontological Society, P.O.
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture

    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture

    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture Forest Service Donald L. Hazlett Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-130 June 2004 Hazlett, Donald L. 2004. Vascular plant species of the Comanche National Grassland in southeast- ern Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-130. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 36 p. Abstract This checklist has 785 species and 801 taxa (for taxa, the varieties and subspecies are included in the count) in 90 plant families. The most common plant families are the grasses (Poaceae) and the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Of this total, 513 taxa are definitely known to occur on the Comanche National Grassland. The remaining 288 taxa occur in nearby areas of southeastern Colorado and may be discovered on the Comanche National Grassland. The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett has worked as an ecologist, botanist, ethnobotanist, and teacher in Latin America and in Colorado. He has specialized in the flora of the eastern plains since 1985. His many years in Latin America prompted him to include Spanish common names in this report, names that are seldom reported in floristic pub- lications. He is also compiling plant folklore stories for Great Plains plants. Since Don is a native of Otero county, this project was of special interest. All Photos by the Author Cover: Purgatoire Canyon, Comanche National Grassland You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
  • COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the Sta.Te H Istorical Society of Colorado VOL

    COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the Sta.Te H Istorical Society of Colorado VOL

    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by The Sta.te H istorical Society of Colorado VOL. V Denver, Colorado, June, 1928 No. 3 The Hatcher Ditch (1846-1928) The Oldest Colorado Irrigation Ditch Now in Use By ..A. W. McHendrie* While it is probable there were irrigating ditches constructed and in use within the present boundaries of the state of Colo­ rado nearly, if not quite, a century prior to this year of our Lord, 1928, none of them are in existence today, nor have they been in use within the memory of any man now living. Priority number one for the right to beneficially use the waters of a natural stream in this state for irrigation purposes has been awarded to, and is still in use by, a ditch located on the Culebra, a tributary to the Rio Grande River, in Costilla County. The beginning of the construction of this ditch, known as ''The San Luis People's Ditch," was ..April 10, 1852, and the ditch has an officially recorded priority as of that date.1 While this ditch is probably entitled to the distinction of being the oldest ditch in Colorado continuously in operation from the date of its construction, nevertheless there is in existence another ditch, the history of which begins about five and a half years earlier and which, ·with a comparatively brief interrup­ tion, has continuously carried water from the stream from which it derives its supply and delivered it to and made fruitful the very tract of land the reclamation of which was the object of its original construction, begun in the latter part of September or the early part of October, 1846.
  • Evaluation of Streamflow Traveltime and Streamflow Gains and Losses Along the Lower Purgatoire River, Southeastern Colorado, 1984-92

    Evaluation of Streamflow Traveltime and Streamflow Gains and Losses Along the Lower Purgatoire River, Southeastern Colorado, 1984-92

    Evaluation of Streamflow Traveltime and Streamflow Gains and Losses Along the Lower Purgatoire River, Southeastern Colorado, 1984-92 By RUSSELL G. DASH and PATRICK EDELMANN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4291 Prepared in cooperation with the PURGATOIRE RIVER WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT and the ARKANSAS RIVER COMPACT ADMINISTRATION Denver, Colorado 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25046, Mail Stop 415 Box 25286 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0286 Denver, CO 80225-0046 CONTENTS Abstract............................................................................................................^^ 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................................................
  • Santa Fe Trail Scenic & Historic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    Santa Fe Trail Scenic & Historic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    Corridor Management Plan Table of Contents Introduction Location and Maps Section 1 Physical Description Section 2 Intrinsic Qualities Section 3 Visitors Needs and Expectations Section 4 Marketing and Promotions Section 5 Peoples Involvement and Responsibilities Appendices Santa Fe Trail Scenic and Historic Byway Interpretive Plan Updated May 2017 for the Santa Fe Trail Scenic and Historic Byway- Mountain Branch Organization Originally prepared in 1997 for Southeast Colorado Enterprise Zone, Inc. & Mountains and Mesas Enterprise Zone Funded in part by Colorado Scenic Byway's, AMerica's Byways, CDOT & FHWA. Introduction Purpose of this Corridor Management Plan Organization and Preparation of the Plan Public Participation Process Mission Statement Goals and Objectives Brief History of the Santa Fe Trail National Historic Trail and Colorado Historic and Scenic Byway Designation Terms and Abbreviations Back to Main Contents Purpose of this Corridor Management Plan This Corridor Management Plan describes the condition, evaluates the resources and guides the future of the Santa Fe Trail Colorado Scenic and Historic Byway. It was created with the participation of persons representing broad interests along the Byway. It incorporates information on the many preservation, development and promotional activities which these agencies and individuals have already implemented and describes future plans for road improvements, management of intrinsic qualities, interpretive development, improvements in tourism facilities and services, sign installation, and marketing. Top Organization and Preparation of the Plan This document consists of six main sections as specified by the guidelines for corridor management plans published by the Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning. These sections are: 1. Location and Maps covering the Trail location relative to the Byway, corridor boundaries, land use and land ownership; 2.
  • Existing Corridor Conditions Report Is Presented for This Purpose

    Existing Corridor Conditions Report Is Presented for This Purpose

    Southern Mountain Loop Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study Existing Corridor Conditions Report - Final December 2019 Prepared for: South Central Council of Governments Colorado Department of Transportation Region 2 Prepared by: Hg Consult, Inc. Atkins Alta Planning + Design Walden Mills Group SOUTHERN MOUNTAIN LOOP PEL STUDY Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................... i List of Figures ....................................................................................................... ii List of Tables ....................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................. v Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Study Location and Description ................................................................................................ 1 Transportation Planning Context.............................................................................................. 3 Regional Tourism and Recreation Activity ................................................................... 10 Regional Tourism Economy ................................................................................................... 10 Scenic Highway of Legends Byway .........................................................................................
  • 2017 Southeast Colorado Hunting Guide

    2017 Southeast Colorado Hunting Guide

    COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE 2017 Southeast Colorado Hunting Guide Includes: • Detailed GMU Descriptions • Public Land in SE GMUs • 2016 Harvest Statistics/Success Rates • Phone Numbers & Contact Info COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE Southeast Region • 4255 Sinton Rd., Colorado Springs 80907 719-227-5200 • www.cpw.state.co.us 2017 Big Game Season Dates & License Fees ARCHERY SEASONS Deer/elk (west of I-25 and Unit 140) Aug. 26-Sept. 24 Plains Deer or Whitetail Only Oct. 1-27, Nov. 8-30, Dec. 15-31 (east of I-25, except Unit 140) Moose Sept. 9-24 Pronghorn (bucks only) Aug. 15-31 Pronghorn (either sex) Sept. 1-20 MUZZLELOADING SEASONS Deer/elk/moose Sept. 9-17 Plains Deer or Whitetale, except Unit 140 Oct. 14-22 Pronghorn Sept. 21-29 RIFLE SEASONS Moose Oct. 1-14 Pronghorn (by draw only) Oct. 7-13 Separate limited elk (1st season) Oct. 14-18 Combined deer/elk (2nd season) Oct. 21-29 Combined deer/elk (3rd season) Nov. 4-12 Combined limited deer/elk (4th season) Nov. 15-19 Plains Deer (east of I-25, except Unit 140) Oct. 28 – Nov. 7 Whitetail Only (Plains) Oct. 28 – Nov. 7 Whitetail Only (West of I-25) Dec. 1-31 Whitetail Only (Plains Late) Dec. 1–14 Late Plains Deer east of I-25, except Unit 140 Dec. 1–14 BLACK BEAR SEASONS Rifle limited (by draw only) Sept. 2-30 Archery (over-the-counter w/cap) Sept. 2-30 Muzzleloading (over-the-counter w/cap) Sept. 9-17 Rifle Bear (over-the-counter w/cap)* Concurrent with deer/elk rifle seasons.
  • National Register Off Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form

    National Register Off Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form

    NPS Form 10-900 0.32) OMB No. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service , For NFS u»e only National Register off Historic Places received SEP 1 2 see Inventory — Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms 2 4 /988 Type ail entries — complete applicable sections uL.»;Xc..',... 1. Name Historic and or common BOGGSVILLE 2. Location street & number jwo miles South of ' La's Animas on Colorado' Highway 101 Hg not tor publication city, town Las Animas X vicinity of '08 state Colorado code' ' county ' 6'ent code Oil 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use X district H/apublic _D/a occupied X agriculture Jl/^museum Jl/abuilding(s) X private x unoccupied Jl/dcommercial n / apark Jl/dstructure Jl/Sboth H/awork in progress Jl/Beducational Jl/Sprivate residence jo/asite Public Acquisition Accessible -A/aentertainment JlZareligious -B/aobject ft/3 in process x yes: restricted n^a government -Q/ascientific n/a being considered H/ayes: unrestricted Jl/a industrial -niatransportation H/ano H/^military ,- • Jl/lother: 4. Owner pff Property name Piortefer 'Historical Society of Bent County c/o Galen Moss, -President street & number P. 0. BOX 63 city, town Las Animas vicinity of state Colorado 81054 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Bent County Courthouse street & number 730 Carson Avenue city, town Las Animas state Colorado 81054 6. Representation in Existing Surveys ________ title Colorado Inventory of Historic Sites has this property been determined eligible? __ yes A no date Ongoing federal state county local depository for survey records Colorado Historical Society, OAHP city, town Denver state Colorado 7.
  • Preserved Dinosaur Tracks in North America

    Preserved Dinosaur Tracks in North America

    A VISION FOR WILD GRASSLANDS A SUSTAINABLE USE CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE FOR THE CIMARRON AND COMANCHE NATIONAL GRASSLANDS REVISED LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION On December 28, 2005 the U.S. Forest Service released its Draft Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands Land Management Plan (70 FR 77373-77374). The Forest Service has been working on the revised plan for several years. Every 10 to 15 years each Forest Service management division must undergo a management plan revision, and the existing plan is over 20 years old. The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands revision process and subsequent Revised Plan will affect the general character and specific components of these public lands including native species and habitat viability, livestock grazing, oil and gas development, and recreation. The revision process presents an opportunity to highlight the diverse wildlife and unique natural and cultural features of the Southern Great Plains prairie region and to promote a shift to biodiversity protection and a nature-based economy. This is also an opportunity for the public to influence management direction on its lands. The purpose of this Sustainable Use Conservation Alternative is to provide a set of land and resource management planning options for the Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands that promote restoration and protection of native wildlife and natural communities while allowing sustainable human uses of these federal lands. The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands Context The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands are hidden jewels within the vast network of public land managed by the federal government. Though containing just over half a million acres these lands host over 1,000 vertebrate and plant species, rare plant communities, picturesque rocky canyons and expansive mesas, numerous sites displaying ancient Native American rock art, long stretches of the Santa Fe National Historic Trail, and the largest assemblage of preserved dinosaur tracks in North America.
  • Purgatoire River Watershed Plan

    Purgatoire River Watershed Plan

    Purgatoire River Watershed Plan Purgatoire Watershed Partnership 2014 Trinidad, Colorado ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Purgatoire River Watershed Plan is a compilation of material from many sources with contributions from numerous community members, watershed stakeholders, government agencies, non-profit organizations and natural resource consultants. The plan was funded through a Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Cooperative Watershed Management Program grant awarded in September 2012 to the Purgatoire Watershed Partnership of Trinidad, Colorado. Special thanks goes to the Spanish Peaks-Purgatoire River Conservation District for serving as the fiscal agent for the Purgatoire Watershed Partnership. Jeff Crane of Crane Associates, LLC, in Carbondale, Colorado, was contracted by the Purgatoire Watershed Partnership to develop the Watershed Plan. However, this plan received substantial assistance from numerous individuals and organizations including but not limited to: Rachel Theler, Purgatoire Watershed Partnership Coordinator (2013-2014) Karen Wolf, Purgatoire Watershed Partnership Coordinator (2014) Elisa Dawson, AmeriCorps VISTA Volunteer (2014) Stephanie DiBetitto, Crane Associates, Assistant (also CWA VISTA-BOR WaterSMART grant application principal author) Ashley Bembenek, Principal, Alpine Environmental, Crested Butte, Colorado Jonnalea Tortorelli, Spanish Peaks-Purgatoire River Conservation District Manager Lucia Machado, Nonpoint Source Section Leader, Colorado Water Quality Control Division Jeff Montoya, District 19 Water Commissioner Jeris