Preserved Dinosaur Tracks in North America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preserved Dinosaur Tracks in North America A VISION FOR WILD GRASSLANDS A SUSTAINABLE USE CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE FOR THE CIMARRON AND COMANCHE NATIONAL GRASSLANDS REVISED LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION On December 28, 2005 the U.S. Forest Service released its Draft Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands Land Management Plan (70 FR 77373-77374). The Forest Service has been working on the revised plan for several years. Every 10 to 15 years each Forest Service management division must undergo a management plan revision, and the existing plan is over 20 years old. The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands revision process and subsequent Revised Plan will affect the general character and specific components of these public lands including native species and habitat viability, livestock grazing, oil and gas development, and recreation. The revision process presents an opportunity to highlight the diverse wildlife and unique natural and cultural features of the Southern Great Plains prairie region and to promote a shift to biodiversity protection and a nature-based economy. This is also an opportunity for the public to influence management direction on its lands. The purpose of this Sustainable Use Conservation Alternative is to provide a set of land and resource management planning options for the Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands that promote restoration and protection of native wildlife and natural communities while allowing sustainable human uses of these federal lands. The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands Context The Comanche and Cimarron National Grasslands are hidden jewels within the vast network of public land managed by the federal government. Though containing just over half a million acres these lands host over 1,000 vertebrate and plant species, rare plant communities, picturesque rocky canyons and expansive mesas, numerous sites displaying ancient Native American rock art, long stretches of the Santa Fe National Historic Trail, and the largest assemblage of preserved dinosaur tracks in North America. The Comanche and Cimarron are also home to the largest complex of black-tailed prairie dogs on public land in the Southern Plains. Prairie dogs are keystone species (Kotliar et al. 1999; Kotliar 2000; Miller et al. 2000). They serve as prey for a variety of prairie wildlife and some use their burrows for breeding sites and shelter. The endangered black-footed ferret, now extirpated from the Cimarron and Comanche, rely on prairie dogs for over 90 percent of their diet. Several Forest CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE FOR THE March 2006 Guardians CIMARRON & COMANCHE NATIONAL GRASSLANDS Page ~2 A VISION FOR WILD GRASSLANDS birds, including the imperiled mountain plover, nest and feed in prairie dog towns because of the increased insect biomass and vegetative diversity on colonies verses un-colonized grassland. Black-tailed prairie dog populations have declined by close to 99 percent, and this decline is linked to the imperilment of other species. Prairie dog recovery and protection—especially on our public Grasslands—is essential to the survival of dependent species. Commercial livestock grazing by locally based ranchers has traditionally been the primary use of the Cimarron and Comanche Grasslands. Located off the beaten path in the rural Southern Great Plains—far from urban centers and major highways or the mountains and forests most people associate with public lands—these national grasslands have historically received relatively few recreational visitors and little attention from the general public. However, this is changing. As Colorado’s human population grows, especially along the Front Range and in the mountains, residents seek new places to find open space, natural beauty, solitude, and opportunities to experience wildlife, wild plants, and nature. Colorado’s mountains are getting crowded. More urbanites now head east to the plains to recreate and to see more of the wildlife, including prairie dogs, foxes, coyotes, pronghorn, eagles, and hawks, disappearing from their own backyards to make way for more people and businesses. Kansans are taking greater advantage of opportunities provided by their largest public land area as well. Nation- wide activities such as bird- and other wildlife watching, hiking, and camping are on the rise. Additionally, there is a growing realization that it is not just our forests, waterways, and coastlines that are suffering biological destruction and species loss; North America’s grasslands are among the most imperiled natural areas in the world. This is not surprising. It should be clear to anyone who flies over the Great Plains and looks down to see the impressive grid of crop fields and cow pastures interspersed with center pivot irrigation circles. We have devoted grasslands almost exclusively to agriculture. Humans had altered the prairie grassland ecosystems for thousands of years. But the large-scale human settlement of the Great Plains over the past 150 years brought wholesale transformation, taming much of the wildness out of the region with the plow, a dense network of roads and barbed wire fences; high-tech irrigation schemes, the purposeful and accidental introduction of non-native forage and invasive plants, and the deliberate—often government-sponsored—extermination of native animals believed to lower agricultural production. The shortgrass prairie regions emerged in better shape than the more eastern tallgrass prairies, where 99.9 percent of the native vegetation is now gone. Yet, only 23 percent of the native shortgrass prairie vegetation remains (USDA Forest Service 1996). To become the “World’s Breadbasket,” the United States sacrificed most Great Plains wildlife and habitat once so vast and diverse that it rivaled Africa’s savannas. Top predators, wolves and grizzly bears were shot and poisoned out of the prairie. Systematic execution nearly exterminated the American bison population from tens of millions to a few hundred individuals at the end of the “Great Slaughter” in the early 1880s (Lott 2002). As the bison perished, the seemingly endless herds of elk and pronghorn lost the majority of their feeding grounds and ability to roam freely across the plains when fences, roads, and plowed fields circumscribed migration routes. Key stopover points for millions of migrating birds that historically made the prairie their temporary home disappeared. Still persecuted as agricultural pests, the beaver and prairie dog—both keystone species—were nearly wiped out. Black-tailed prairie dog populations are currently at only one to two percent of their historic size, and beavers are missing from most of the riparian systems where they belong. Prairie ecosystems continue to be degraded by direct habitat destruction, suppression of natural processes such as wildfire, fragmentation by roads and urban sprawl, and adverse impacts from the spread of invasive species. Forest CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE FOR THE March 2006 Guardians CIMARRON & COMANCHE NATIONAL GRASSLANDS Page ~3 A VISION FOR WILD GRASSLANDS Every nation must feed its citizens. We all deserve high quality affordable food that benefits the country’s producers as well as consumers. Yet a country as advanced as the United States can find creative ways to make room for and protect some of the creatures who lost out in our quest to become an agricultural superpower—so successful that one of our biggest social and health problems has become an excess of food. The National Grasslands should therefore increasingly be focal areas for restoring biodiversity. We can start revitalizing the wild prairie by focusing on our National Grasslands. Very few protected areas exist in the Great Plains for native wildlife. Because most of the land in the Southern Plains is privately owned and devoted to commercial farming and ranching, the National Grasslands offer some of the best hope for restoring and conserving significant pieces of native prairie. However, shifting old management procedures and practices will be a significant social challenge as well as a biological challenge. Those who have benefited from the long-standing policy of prioritizing commercial activities over the natural heritage of public lands have strongly opposed conservation efforts by the Forest Service and continue to resist new proposals that might limit commercial use in any way. To prevent the total loss of the Southern Prairie natural heritage, Grasslands management must evolve. The U.S. Forest Service manages 20 National Grasslands primarily concentrated in the Great Plains. The Comanche and Cimarron comprise part of a cluster of National Grasslands in the Southern Plains that also include the Kiowa in northeastern New Mexico and the Rita Blanca, which sits on the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles right at the New Mexico border. The Forest Service Southwest Region Three manages the Kiowa and Rita Blanca along with Black Kettle, which is on the eastern edge of the Texas panhandle in Oklahoma and outside the shortgrass prairie range. The Rocky Mountain Region of U.S. Forest Service manages the Comanche and Cimarron Grasslands within the Pike and San Isabel and Comanche and Cimarron (PSICC) National Forest System. The Comanche’s 435,028 acres is divided into two management units in southeastern Colorado, the Timpas Unit in Otero County south of the town of La Junta and the Carrizo Unit in Baca and eastern Las Animas Counties. The Cimarron occupies part of southwestern Kansas along the Cimarron River in Morton and Stevens Counties, and at 108,175 acres, is the largest public land holding in
Recommended publications
  • Reconnaissance Survey of the Indian Hills Subdivision Enid, Garfield County, Oklahoma
    FINAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY OF THE INDIAN HILLS SUBDIVISION ENID, GARFIELD COUNTY, OKLAHOMA by Sherry N. DeFreece Emery, M.S., MArch Adapt ǀ re:Adapt Preservation and Conservation, LLC 1122 Jackson Street #518 Dallas, Texas 75202 Prepared for City of Enid, Oklahoma 401 West Owen K. Garriott Road P.O. Box 1768 Enid, OK 73702 Adapt ǀ re:Adapt Project Number 2015007 June 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Reconnaissance Survey of the Indian Hills Subdivision FINAL Report ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SUPPORT The activity that is the subject of this Reconnaissance Survey has been financed with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. Nondiscrimination Statement This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act or 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Chief, Office of Equal Opportunity United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 1201 Eye Street, NW (2740) Washington, D.C. 20005 June 2016 iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Reconnaissance Survey of the Indian Hills Subdivision FINAL Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quanah and Cynthia Ann Parker: the Ih Story and the Legend Booth Library
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Booth Library Programs Conferences, Events and Exhibits Spring 2015 Quanah and Cynthia Ann Parker: The iH story and the Legend Booth Library Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/booth_library_programs Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Booth Library, "Quanah and Cynthia Ann Parker: The iH story and the Legend" (2015). Booth Library Programs. 15. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/booth_library_programs/15 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences, Events and Exhibits at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Booth Library Programs by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quanah & Cynthia Ann Parker: The History and the Legend e story of Quanah and Cynthia Ann Parker is one of love and hate, freedom and captivity, joy and sorrow. And it began with a typical colonial family’s quest for a better life. Like many early American settlers, Elder John Parker, a Revolutionary War veteran and Baptist minister, constantly felt the pull to blaze the trail into the West, spreading the word of God along the way. He led his family of 13 children and their descendants to Virginia, Georgia and Tennessee before coming to Illinois, where they were among the rst white settlers of what is now Coles County, arriving in c. 1824. e Parkers were inuential in colonizing the region, building the rst mill, forming churches and organizing government. One of Elder John’s many grandchildren was Cynthia Ann Parker, who was born c.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Changes on the Sheyenne National Grassland Using Multitemproal Landsat Data
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2017 Monitoring Changes On The heS yenne National Grassland Using Multitemporal Landsat Data Stefano Potter Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Potter, Stefano, "Monitoring Changes On The heyS enne National Grassland Using Multitemporal Landsat Data" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2137. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2137 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONITORING CHANGES ON THE SHEYENNE NATIONAL GRASSLAND USING MULTITEMPROAL LANDSAT DATA By Stefano Marano Potter Bachelor of Science, University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, 2010 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2017 PERMISSION Title Monitoring Changes on the Sheyenne National Grassland using Multitemporal Landsat Data Department Earth System Science and Policy Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised by thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: Lesser Prairie-Chicken Survey − Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands, 2014
    Final Report: Lesser Prairie-Chicken Survey − Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands, 2014 Project Manager: Angela Dwyer, Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, 230 Cherry St., Fort Collins, CO 80521 ([email protected]) Project Director: David Hanni, Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, 230 Cherry St., Fort Collins, CO 80521 ([email protected]) Introduction The Lesser Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) (LEPC) occupies grassland habitat consisting of sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) and mixed grass vegetation communities of the southern Great Plains. Since the 19th century, LEPC and the habitat upon which they depend has diminished across their historical range (Crawford and Bolen 1976, Taylor and Guthery 1980a), with recent estimates of current occupied range totaling approximately 17% of the estimated area of their historical range. Causes for this reduction in occupied range are primarily attributed to habitat loss and fragmentation (USFWS 2012). Habitat loss has been caused by conversion of native prairie to cropland (Bent 1932, Copelin 1963, Taylor and Guthery 1980) and long term fire suppression (Woodward et al. 2001) leading to tree invasion (Fuhlendorf et al. 2002). Grazing management practices would help improve habitat if managed to benefit LEPC. Heavily grazed fields that leave no residual vegetation for broods can be detrimental to LEPC (Sell 1979, Hunt and Best 2010). Habitat fragmentation has resulted from a combination of habitat loss and degradation caused by oil and gas development (Hunt 2004) and suspected effects of wind energy development (Pruett et al. 2009). The LEPC is not thought to occur in Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands (KRB) (Giesen 2003), however some parcels within the grasslands are managed for LEPC.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Guide to the Pawnee Grasslands. IISTITOTIOS Colorado Outward Bound School, Denver
    bOCOHEIT BBSOHE ED 139 566 RC 009 900 A0THOR Kielsmeier, Jim; And Others TITLE Resource Guide to the Pawnee Grasslands. IISTITOTIOS Colorado Outward Bound School, Denver. POB -DATE Aug 75 OTB 35p. miLABLB FROM Colorado Outward Bound School, 945 Pennsylvania ,Street, Denver, Colorado 80203 ($2.00) BffRS MICE HP-S0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS American Indians; Anthropology; Archaeology; Climactic Factors; *Environmental Education; Environmental Influences; Field Trips; Geology; History; Information Sources; *Integrated Activities; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Land Settlement; Literature; Migration Patterns; Nutrition; *0utdoor Education; *Resource Guides; Resource Materials; Unit Plan IDENTIFIERS ^Colorado; Logistics; 'Pawnee Grasslands ABSTRACT Colorado's Pawnee Grasslands are well suited for a wide range of academic study, from astronomy to zoology. Designed for. educators and youth leaders seeking to integrate an alternative experience into their curriculum or recreation program, this guile is intended to give leaders of excutsions to the Grasslands a sense of what's out there and some ideas on how to creatively use the environment. The guide presents information on the: Grasslands as a learning environment; archaeological sequence in the Central Great Plains; recent American Indian history; the Buffalo Range from 1850 to 1880; migration and settlement patterns in Northeastern Colorado; settlement dates of selected towns in Northeastern Colorado; white man and the Grasslands; geology of the Pawnee Grasslands--soil, climate, precipitation and temperature, important grasses, and birds and mammals; development of a unit an interdisciplinary approach to the Grasslands, activity sites, equipment, safety, food and water suggestions, nutritional components in the edible portion of one pound of food, sample ideas for experience-oriented interdisciplinary Grasslands units; and Grasslands information sources covering anthropology, environment, Indian history, literature, outdoor skills/logistics of field trips, and pioneer history.
    [Show full text]
  • County Economic Southeast Colorado Observatory Development Commission Inc
    PIERRE AUGER COSMIC RAY BACA COUNTY ECONOMIC SOUTHEAST COLORADO OBSERVATORY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC. ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, INC. The Pierre Auger Project is a collaboration of 17 countries and Baca County Community Foundation, (BCCF) was Created in 1986 by the counties of Baca, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa more than 350 scientists coming together to study one of the founded to promote responsible, sustainable development and Prowers, SECED administers programs in cooperation greatest mysteries in science today, ultra-high energy cosmic and growth through the expansion and or retention of with our 24 members, comprised of local governments. rays, the universe’s highest energy particles. The Auger the county’s agricultural business. Bordering Kansas, SECED provides incentives and develops promotional Observatory is located at two sites: the completed southern Oklahoma, and New Mexico, Baca County is a farming and ranching community located in the very southeast activities that will market and advertise the advantages of hemisphere site is located in Malargue, Argentina and the corner of Colorado. It is rich in history, natural resources locating a business in the Southeast Colorado area, create a northern hemisphere site will be located in a region of 4,000 and wildlife. Baca County is in an enterprise zone that positive identity, encourage retention and expansion of existing square miles in the counties of Baca, Bent, Kiowa and Prowers. offers tax credits as well as other assistance in relocation business, promote redevelopment, expand the region’s tourism Photo by SECED, Inc. With access to both sites, scientists will be able to “view” the entire to Southeastern Colorado. industry, attract new businesses, and generally enhance the universe and to study the entire sky.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO Parks and Wildlife
    COLORADO Parks and Wildlife Depai lmenl of Natural Resources Durango Area 15 Office 151 East 16th Street Durango, Colorado 81301 P 970.247.0855 I F 970.382. 6672 September 20, 2016 Ms. Cam Hooley Columbine Ran ger District San Juan National Forest P.O. Box 439 Bayfield, CO 81122 Re: Initial Draft Hermosa Creek Watershed Management Plan Dear Ms. Hooley: Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has reviewed the Initial Draft Hermosa Creel< Watershed Management Plan (Hermosa Plan). The newly created Hermosa Creek Wilderness and the Hermosa Special Management Area (SMA) are a result of a collaborative effort from a diverse group of local stakeholders that desired to achieve legislative protection of the watershed. The legislation that created the Hermosa Creek Watershed Protection stat es : "The purpose of the Special Man agement Area is to conserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the watershed, geological, scientific, recreational, wildlife, riparian, historical, educational, and scenic resources of the Special Management Area." The Hermosa Plan is an amendment to the 2013 San Juan National Forest (SJNF) Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan), and the Recreational and Travel Management analysis and decision will be an integral part of the plan. The Hermosa Plan area is approximately 107, 900 ac res of National Forest land and includes both the SMA and Hermosa Creek Wilderness located in La Plata and San Juan Counties. It is a popular destination for many types of motorized and non -motorized rec reation including: Off Hi ghway Vehicle (OHV) riding, motorbiking, mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, fishing, hunting, and camping.
    [Show full text]
  • Oglala Grasslands Oglala Grasslands
    Oglala Grasslands landscape occupies the plains and rolling hills in the northwestern Panhandle north of the Pine Ridge. Mixed-grass prairie covers most of the plains and hills. Rock outcrops and badlands are dispersed among the prairie, as are small stream valleys. The soils are predominantly clays derived from Pierre Shale and, the prairie is dominated by blue grama, green needle grass, and western wheatgrass. This landscape is one of the larger, intact grasslands remaining in Nebraska and contains extensive badlands. Several plant communities including the western floodplain terrace grassland, silver sagebrush shrub prairie, greasewood shrub prairie, and northwestern mixed-grass prairie occur nowhere else in the state. Scattered playas occur in the landscape. These grasslands support extensive prairie dog towns, swift fox populations, and extensive habitat for grassland birds. Prairie dog towns within the BUL may be suitable for colonization of black-footed ferrets migrating from established colonies in southwestern South Dakota. The Oglala National Grassland occupies a large portion of this landscape. Stresses Affecting Species and Habitats Specific livestock grazing and haying practices that may reduce native plant diversity and promote uniform habitat structure Invasive plant species, primarily cheatgrass Potential disease in prairie dog populations Conservation Strategies Work with private landowners and the U.S. Forest Service to implement ecologically-sensitive grazing strategies that reduce cheatgrass and promote native
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Tailed Praire Dog Surveys in Pueblo, Crowley, Otero
    BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG SURVEYS OF BLM LANDS IN EASTERN COLORADO A Report to the Bureau of Land Management, Canon City Office By The Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University March 2004 Timothy J Assal and John R Sovell Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………….…4 METHODS……………………………………………………………………………………….6 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………………………...7 Study Area………………………………………………………………………………………7 Element Occurrences of Animals Tracked by CNHP………………………………………….11 Parcel Summaries………………………………………………………………………………17 Baca County………………………………………………………………………………..15 Bent County..…………………………………………...……………………………....….21 El Paso County..…………………………………………………………….…...…………27 Kiowa County…………………………………………………………………...…………29 Las Animas County………………………………………………………………………...33 Lincoln County…………………………………………………………..………………...39 Logan County………………………………………………..……………………………..45 Morgan County………………..…………………………………………………………...47 Prowers County…..…………….…………………………………………………………..51 Sedgwick County…………………………………………………………………………..55 Washington County…….………………………………………………………………….57 Weld County………………….……………………………………………………………59 Yuma County………………………………………………………………………………61 Potential Conservation Areas….…………………………………………………………...65 B2 Potential Conservation Areas………………………………………………………...65 Chico Basin Shortgrass Prairie..……………………………………………………..65 Jesus Mesa……...…………………………………………………………………....71 Neeskah…….………….………………………………………………….………….75 Signal
    [Show full text]
  • Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Thomas O. Boggs December 2012 Boggsville Reconnaissance Study, History, and Evaluation of Significance Bent County, Colorado Background his reconnaissance study was prepared by the National Park Service (NPS) at T the request of U.S. Representative Cory Gardner (CO), who asked the NPS to evaluate Boggsville, Colorado, as a potential new unit of the park service.1 Boggsville, which is in Bent County, Colorado, is a 39-acre historic district that was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986; that nomination determined that Boggsville had a state level of significance. The purpose of the NPS reconnaissance study was to determine if Boggsville also met NPS criteria for national significance. If deemed nationally significant, Boggsville could then be further considered as a National Historic Landmark, or as a potential unit of the NPS. The primary contributing buildings at Boggsville include the Thomas O. Boggs home and the John W. Prowers house. The Pioneer Historical Society of Bent County acquired Boggsville in 1985. The site consists of 110 acres of land, of which 39 acres are associated with the Boggsville settlement. Thomas Boggs Home - NPS Photo, Greg Kendrick The history and evaluation of national significance was prepared by historian and PhD candidate Steven C. Baker, under the supervision of Dr. Ralph Mann, associate professor, Department of History, University of Colorado Boulder, working in cooperation with the Heritage Partnerships Program of the NPS Intermountain Region. 1 Cory Gardner, Member of Congress, House of Representatives, letter to Jon Jarvis, Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper FIRM Conversion Bent County Hydrology Report
    CHAMP Phase III, Bent County, Colorado Hydrologic Analyses Report CWCB CONTRACT # CT PDAA 2017-3860 November 30, 2017 Submitted by: Amec Foster Wheeler Colorado Center Tower II 2000 South Colorado Blvd., Suite 200 Denver, CO 80222 USA Page i List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Existing Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 3 Flood Insurance Study .................................................................................................................. 3 Letters of Map Amendment ............................................................................................................ 3 Proposed Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 3 Method Selection ......................................................................................................................... 3 Bulletin 17C Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 USGS Qualification Codes ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Region Big Game Hunting Guide 2012
    COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE 2012 Southeast Colorado Hunting Guide Includes: - GMU Descriptions - Harvest Statistics & Success Rates * Elk * Deer * Pronghorn Colorado PARKS aNd Wildlife Southeast region Service Center • 4255 Sinton rd., Colorado Springs 80907 (719) 227-5200 • www.wildlife.state.co.us COLLEGIATe PeaKS: UNiTS 48, 481, 56, 561 DEER HARVEST STATISTICS Total Total Percent Success Unit Season Buck Doe Fawn Harvest Hunters Last Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 48 Archery 8 0 0 8 77 10 13 12 48 Muzzle 9 0 0 9 33 27 25 28 48 2nd Rifle 46 0 0 46 113 41 29 25 48 3rd Rifle 9 0 0 9 30 30 29 28 481 Archery 5 0 0 5 63 8 6 4 481 Muzzle 9 0 0 9 34 26 17 22 481 2nd Rifle 88 16 0 104 207 50 46 43 481 3rd Rifle 63 15 0 78 164 48 54 50 481 Late 0 31 2 33 36 92 92 92 56 Archery 11 0 0 11 50 22 10 18 56 Muzzle 9 0 0 9 27 33 22 27 56 2nd Rifle 62 25 0 87 214 41 37 39 56 3rd Rifle 17 15 3 35 154 23 29 27 561 Archery 0 0 0 0 32 0 1 4 561 Muzzle 6 0 0 6 18 33 12 24 561 2nd Rifle 21 0 0 21 60 35 24 25 561 3rd Rifle 37 0 0 37 103 36 46 33 COLLEGIATe PeaKS: UNiTS 48, 481, 56, 561 ELK HARVEST STATISTICS Total Total Percent Success Unit Season Bull Cow Calf Harvest Hunters Last Yr 3 Yrs 5 Yrs 48 Archery 12 5 0 17 141 12 15 14 48 Muzzle 6 2 3 11 89 12 17 18 48 1st Rifle 29 0 0 29 64 45 37 38 48 2nd Rifle 20 30 0 50 227 22 32 26 48 3rd Rifle 3 14 4 21 67 31 33 29 48 4th Rifle 0 13 4 17 70 24 25 21 481 Archery 7 4 0 11 99 11 17 14 481 Muzzle 8 0 0 8 71 11 15 16 481 Early 0 26 0 26 69 38 40 40 481 1st Rifle 22 0 0 22 81 27 32 37 481 2nd Rifle 22 33 2 57 309 18 25 22 481 3rd
    [Show full text]