DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Stormwater to Protect Water Resources in Mountainous Regions of Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Stormwater to Protect Water Resources in Mountainous Regions of Colorado Managing Stormwater to Protect Water Resources in Mountainous Regions of Colorado PREPARED FOR: Clear Creek County Berten Weaver, Community Development Director P.O. Box 2000 Georgetown, CO 80444 PREPARED BY: Ralf Topper, CPG July 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Applicability .................................................................................................................................. 3 Cited References ........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Water Resource Impacts of Development .................................................................................... 5 Recharge concepts/definition ...................................................................................................... 5 Surface and subsurface infiltration .............................................................................................. 6 Why stormwater matters ............................................................................................................. 8 Managing stormwater to protect water resources .................................................................... 10 Socioeconomic Benefits .............................................................................................................. 11 3. Hydrogeology of Clear Creek County .......................................................................................... 13 Climate Considerations ............................................................................................................... 13 Average Annual and Mean Monthly Precipitation ..................................................................... 15 Rainfall Frequency Spectrum ...................................................................................................... 17 Geology ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Groundwater .............................................................................................................................. 21 Groundwater Recharge .............................................................................................................. 25 Cited References ......................................................................................................................... 26 4. The Regulatory Environment ...................................................................................................... 29 Federal (EPA) .............................................................................................................................. 29 State (CDPHE) ............................................................................................................................. 30 Local (Clear Creek Co.) ................................................................................................................ 30 Ramifications of Colorado Water Law ........................................................................................ 33 5. Maintaining Pre‐Development Hydrology – Nonstructural Controls .............................................. 35 Land Use Planning ...................................................................................................................... 35 Low Impact Development Strategies .......................................................................................... 37 Evaluation of Costs and Benefits ................................................................................................ 38 Cited References ......................................................................................................................... 41 6. Structural Control Measures/Best Management Practices ........................................................ 43 Filtration ..................................................................................................................................... 45 Infiltration ................................................................................................................................... 46 i Detention .................................................................................................................................... 47 Flow Control ............................................................................................................................... 48 7. Considerations for BMP selection in mountainous terrain ........................................................ 51 Appendix A: Groundwater Recharge Potential Analysis Appendix B: Filtration Based Best Management Practices Appendix C: Infiltration Based Best Management Practices Appendix D: Detention Based Best Management Practices Appendix E: Flow Control Based Best Management Practices ii Acknowledgements This project was made possible by the vision and efforts of Clear Creek County’s Community Development Director, Mr. Berten R. Weaver. In a cooperative effort with the Colorado Geological Survey, Mr. Weaver applied for funding through the Colorado Water Conservation Board’s 2007‐2008 Severance Tax Trust Fund Operational Account. In December 2008, the State of Colorado issued a purchase order in the amount of $50,000.00 to fund the work proposed in the original grant application. In February 2009, Clear Creek County entered into an agreement with the Colorado Geological Survey to implement the tasks specified in the scope of work. This manual represents the culmination of the work effort on this project. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Clear Creek County staff in providing information, support, and coordination functions for this project. In particular, Mr. Bert Weaver, Community Development Director; Mr. Frederick Rollenhagen, Planning Director; and Mr. Matt Taylor, GIS Director. A special thanks is extended to Clear Creek County’s Site Development Inspector, Mr. Tim Vogel whose proactive approach to stormwater management is leading the county to meet its sustainable goals. The Colorado Geological Survey was fortunate to contract with Mr. Gregory Zimmerman for identifying and compiling existing stormwater management literature, establishing a database of best management practices, and creating fact sheets for structural BMPs. Completion of this project would not have been possible without the assistance of Mrs. Michelle DeLaria‐Kutschera whose expertise in stormwater management along Colorado’s Front Range is well recognized. Locally, Michelle has been a key proponent of managing stormwater to mimic a site’s predevelopment hydrology. Contributing staff of the Colorado Geological Survey include: Karen Berry, Eric Oerter, and Nick Watterson. iii iv 1. Introduction Like much of the Front Range of Colorado, Clear Creek County is defined by its landforms, climate, vegetation, and focused population centers (Fig. 1‐1). The physiographic characteristics of the county include high peaks, great relief, rugged terrain, steep slopes, and shallow soils. The climate varies from semi‐arid to alpine with elevations above 10,000 feet receiving an average of 25 inches or more of moisture per year. Vegetation varies from alpine tundra above timberline to thick stands of evergreen forest with interspersed mountain meadows and communities of aspen trees. The population in this mountainous county is sparse with 39 or fewer residents per square mile. However, because of the rugged terrain and dominance of federally owned land, most of its residents are concentrated along mountain flanks and stream valleys. The residents of the unincorporated portions of the county and certain municipal and commercial entities rely largely on groundwater for their water supply. With the exception of narrow alluvial aquifers along stream systems, this water supply is limited by the fractured, crystalline rock aquifers that store this resource. Increasing population growth and development have raised concerns about the sustainability of the groundwater resource. The purpose and focus of this study is to identify and promote stormwater management technologies and practices that may be implemented locally to protect and conserve water resources through mitigation of detrimental impacts caused by land disturbances and modifications associated with land development. Natural runoff results when rainfall or snowmelt exceeds the capacity of the ground to absorb the additional moisture. The tendency of an area to produce runoff as overland or channelized flow depends upon vegetation, soils, geology, slope and climate. Naturally vegetated or undisturbed ecosystems produce little to no runoff from the vast majority of precipitation events. For example, on undeveloped property on the plains of the Denver Front Range area there is less than one runoff event a year (Urbonas, 2006). The native environment has and continues to evolve towards optimum management of excess water through evapotranspiration, infiltration, and natural runoff. While runoff is part of the natural hyrologic cycle, man‐made hydrologic modifications that accompany development have increased the volume of stormwater runoff significantly. Land use modifications by human activities, particularly urbanization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published Bi-Monthly by the State Historical Society of Colorado
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published bi-monthly by The State Historical Society of Colorado Vol.XVIII Denver, Colorado, September, 1941 No. 5 John Taylor-Slave-Born Colorado Pioneer* D. B. McGuE "Yes, sub-yes, sub, I wuz de fust white man to settle in de Pine ribber valley ob sou 'wes 'rn Colorado.'' ''That's right, John,'' chorused a group of a dozen or more grizzled white men, gathered at an annual reunion of San Juan pioneers-those argonauts who came to the region before 1880. My eyes bugged out like biscuits. The first speaker was a black man. A short, chunky block of glistening granite black. John Taylor. One of the most interesting characters ever to ride the wild trails in the wild southwest and across the border into Mexico before he settled in southwestern Colorado . .John Taylor was born at Paris, Kentucky, in 1841, according to his army record. He was the son of slave parents. ''Cos I doan 't 'membah much about de fust, two, free yea 's ob my life,'' John declared. ''But I 'spect I wuz lak all de odah pickaninnies. I suah does 'membah clat as soon as I wuz big 'nuf to mock a man at wo'k, I wuz sent into de cawn an' baccy fiel's, an' 'til I wuz twenty-free I wuz raised on de hamlle ob a hoe." ''And then what happened, John?'' ''I becomes a runaway niggah, '' John chuckled. On August 17, 1864, John Taylor enlisted in the first negro regiment recruited by Union army officials in Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmobile Use Map for Sulphur Ranger District
    Snowmobile Use Map Arapaho National Forest - Sulphur Ranger District - Grand County, CO Check with Groomed Routes Maintained by Parks Ranger District JACKSON Routt National Forest LARIMER the Following Partners: UV750 for snowmobile information * Grand Lake Trail Groomers ¤£40 ¤£34 GRAND * Grand Adventures Granby BOULDER AREA 40 OF ¤£ GILPIN Denver NEVER SUMMER DETAIL PROHIBITIONS WILDERNESS EAGLE CLEAR ¨¦§70 A R A P A H O CREEK It is prohibited to possess or operate an UV123 SUMMIT over-snow vehicle on National Forest 0 10 20 B O W E N G U L C H Sulphur Ranger District Miles System lands on the Sulphur Ranger B O W E N G U L C H P R O T E C T II O N District other than in accordance with 34 A R E A ¤£ these designations (CFR 261.14). An over-snow vehicle is a motor vehicle that «¬125 is designated for use over snow and that N A T II O N A L runs on a track or tracks and/or a ski or skis while in use over snow. R O C K Y +$491 Violations of 36 CFR 261.14 are subject M O U N T A I N to a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment 108 N A T I O N A L for up to 6 months, or both (18 U.S.C. UV Grand Lake Gr an 3571(e)). This prohibition applies regard- d s La P A R K e ke R less of the presence or absence of signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Western Area Power - Special use management On Hold N/A N/A David Loomis Administration Right-of-Way 303-275-5008 Maintenance and [email protected] Reauthorization Project Description: Update vegetation management activities along 278 miles of transmission lines located on NFS lands in Colorado, EIS Nebraska, and Utah. These activities are intended to protect the transmission lines by managing for stable, low growth vegetation. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=30630 Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Grand Valley Ranger District, Norwood Ranger District, Yampa Ranger District, Hahns Peak/Bears Ears Ranger District, Pine Ridge Ranger District, Sulphur Ranger District, East Zone/Dillon Ranger District, Paonia Ranger District, Boulder Ranger District, West Zone/Sopris Ranger District, Canyon Lakes Ranger District, Salida Ranger District, Gunnison Ranger District, Mancos/Dolores Ranger District. STATE - Colorado, Nebraska, Utah. COUNTY - Chaffee, Delta, Dolores, Eagle, Grand, Gunnison, Jackson, Lake, La Plata, Larimer, Mesa, Montrose, Routt, Saguache, San Juan, Dawes, Daggett, Uintah. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Linear transmission lines located in Colorado, Utah, and Nebraska. R2 - Rocky Mountain Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Colorado Mountain School - Special use management Developing Proposal Expected:07/2018 07/2018 Jaime Oliva CE Est. Scoping Start 06/2018 303-541-2509 [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The Forest Service proposes to issue a ten-year outfitter and guide permit for mountaineering, avalanche education, and ski touring.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory
    2010 Season Summary Index NEW WOFTHE~ Zone 1: Yukon Territory ........................................................................................... 3 Alaska ... ........................................ ............................................................... 3 LEPIDOPTERISTS Zone 2: British Columbia .................................................... ........................ ............ 6 Idaho .. ... ....................................... ................................................................ 6 Oregon ........ ... .... ........................ .. .. ............................................................ 10 SOCIETY Volume 53 Supplement Sl Washington ................................................................................................ 14 Zone 3: Arizona ............................................................ .................................... ...... 19 The Lepidopterists' Society is a non-profo California ............... ................................................. .............. .. ................... 2 2 educational and scientific organization. The Nevada ..................................................................... ................................ 28 object of the Society, which was formed in Zone 4: Colorado ................................ ... ............... ... ...... ......................................... 2 9 May 1947 and formally constituted in De­ Montana .................................................................................................... 51 cember
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Wolf Creek Ski Area
    Directions To Wolf Creek Ski Area Sometimes tropical Chaddie deplumed her farriery bodily, but statist Urban testified exaggeratedly or dozing physiognomically. Tallie is gory: she gravings unthoughtfully and aromatizing her teslas. Everett is dynamically supercriminal after goutiest Reagan facsimileing his squabbler snowily. Fixed Grip Triple Chairlift that services primarily beginner and intermediate terrain. Unauthorized copying or redistribution prohibited. September along this area current skiing and directions laid out of creek ski areas are in. This area next stop at an escape. Colorados beautiful San Juan Mountains, is near Purgatory and is home to a regional airport served by American, United and US Airways. Massive wolf creek ski areas are pretty scarce along the. These cookies are used to replicate your website experience and home more personalized services to you, gone on this website and match other media. All directions to wolf creek area travel planning just after the areas along the highway. To at it, contact us. The owner split after payment, so you can impair this sovereign by paying only a portion of all total today. It passes through the present exchange on to wolf creek ski area, growling stomachs are allowed. Or ski area to creek ski. Several of creek of avon and from taos, colorado resorts list of wolf creek adventure and offers skiers and you. There are responsible for sale or password has been there are located in south. Your skiing to creek area getting your form below to know more? There was an error processing your request. The Most Snow in Colorado! Continental divide display sign.
    [Show full text]
  • BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN for Data Analysis Unit RBS-3
    BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT RBS-3 Georgetown Herd GAME MANAGEMENT UNIT S32 Prepared for: Colorado Division of Wildlife By: Sherri Huwer Terrestrial Wildlife Biologist Northeast Region Date: March 2010 Photo: Brett Crimmel i RBS-3 Bighorn Sheep Management Plan______________________ DAU RBS-3 (Georgetown Bighorn Sheep) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GMUs: S32 Land Ownership: 46% Private, 36% USFS, 11% City/County, 5 % State, 2% DOW, 1% BLM Posthunt Population: Previous Objective 250-350 2008 Estimate 370 Current Objective 250 - 350 Posthunt Sex Ratio: Previous Objective 60-80 2008 Observed 88 2008 Modeled 89 Current Object. 60-80 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Population Estimate Population 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Objective Estimate Figure 1: RBS-3 bighorn posthunt population estimate and objective range from 1991 to 2008. 120 100 80 60 40 20 Rams : 100 Ewes100 : Rams 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Modeled Observed Objective Range Figure 2: Observed, modeled and objective range of posthunt sex ratios for RBS-3 from 1991 to 2008. 40 30 20 10 Number Removed Number 0 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Rams Ewes Figure 3: RBS-3 ram and ewe removals via harvest and translocation from bioyear 1982 to 2008. i RBS-3 Bighorn Sheep Management Plan______________________ Background Information The Georgetown Bighorn Sheep herd (Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Data Analysis Unit 1 - DAU RBS-3) is one of the largest herds in Colorado. It is also one of the most highly valued for the opportunities it provides for hunting, wildlife viewing, and photography and as a source of bighorns for reintroductions and herd supplementations throughout Colorado and other states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Newsletter for Friends of the CAIC Spring 2003 ¨ Volume 7, Number 3
    A Newsletter for Friends of the CAIC Spring 2003 ¨ Volume 7, Number 3 for our CAIC crew. Some of the “If one wants to avalanche activity reached historic avoid avalanche proportions, and it was truly a wonder to have seen this. Unfortunately, these danger, one should types of events can come at a great cost to the people, the economy, and winter stay in bed, and activities in Colorado. In this last issue of The Beacon for the make sure the 2002–03 season, Knox Williams exam- ines the amazing storm that struck the house is not in an Front Range on March 17–20 with such intensity that people will be talking avalanche path.” about it for years, if not decades. by Scott Toepfer We also have an article from —Andre Roch Jonathan Thompson, the editor of the Silverton Standard & the Miner, one of Colorado’s oldest s you pick up this issue we are heading newspapers. Silverton has a long history of snow and down the road to spring or summer avalanche research. Jonathan's article profiles Chris depending on your elevation. As usual our Landry, who now continues Silverton's tradition in ava- winter was full of excitement, dry spells, lanche research at the Center for Snow and Avalanche A big storms, smiles and tragedy. Early Studies. season forecasts had called for a winter with near- Our last piece is by Brad Sawtell, the lead at the new normal temperatures and precipitation. The jury is still Summit County Avalanche Office. deliberating the final verdict with the given evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Jones Pass Road
    MP 248 – 249: The Jones Pass Road There are several items of interest between these two mileage posts. In this mile are several examples of what the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has done to improve the safety of the traveling public, as well as a picnic area, a waterfall, tunnels and comments from the Project Engineer for the CDOT Widening Project. This section’s description begins at the top near the 248 mileage post. Read more information about history of U.S. Highway 40. Route Mile Marker X Y Longitude Latitude 1U. S. Highway 40 248 431155.03 4403068.51 -105.803887 39.774771 249 430545.47 4402619.15 -105.810957 39.770673 The community of Berthoud Falls was named for a waterfall that can be seen in this section of U. S. Highway 40. Also in this section is a sign for Colorado’s Adopt-A-Highway program. This is a way that citizens and organizations can help keep U. S. Highway 40 over Berthoud Pass beautiful. There are several available on the Pass. For more information refer to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) website: http://www.coloradodot.info/programs/adopt-a- highway for more information. The previous Big Bend curve on U. S. Highway 40 was tight and could be dangerous. An important part of the widening project was improvements to this curve. A new entrance was created to the Jones Pass Road and Henderson Mine Complex. 1 Taken from the Colorado Department of Transportation’s website: http://apps.coloradodot.info/dataaccess/Highways/index.cfm?fuseaction=HighwaysMain MP 248 – 249: The Jones Pass Road (PAW 2012) 1 This is a U.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Colorado River and Its Utilization
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otts Smith, Director Water-Supply Paper 617 UPPER COLORADO RIVER AND ITS UTILIZATION BY ROBERT FOLLANSBEE f UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1929 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - * ' Price 85 cents CONTENTS Preface, by Nathan C. Grover______________________ ____ vn .Synopsis of report.-____________________________________ xi Introduction_________________________________________ 1 Scope of report--------__---__-_____--___--___________f__ 1 Index system____________________________________ _ ______ 2 Acknowledgments.._______-________________________ __-______ 3 Bibliography _ _________ ________________________________ 3 Physical features of basin________________-________________-_____-__ 5 Location and accessibility______--_________-__________-__-_--___ 5 Topography________________________________________________ 6 Plateaus and mountains__________________________________ 6 The main riyer_________________________________________ 7 Tributaries above Gunnison River_._______________-_-__--__- 8 Gunnison River_----_---_----____-_-__--__--____--_-_----_ IS Dolores Eiver____________________._______________________ 17 Forestation__________________ ______._.____________________ 19 Scenic and recreational features_-__-__--_____-__^--_-__________ 20 General features________________________.______--__-_--_ 20 Mountain peaks_________--_.__.________________________ 20 Lakes....__._______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Creek Ranger Distric MVUM
    United States Department of Agriculture of Department States United 420000 430000 440000 450000 460000 470000 Forest Service Forest 105°52'30"W 105°45'0"W 105°37'30"W 105°30'0"W 105°22'30"W Legend +$ +$ Thorodin Mtn Colorado JAN-01-2010 Colorado ) Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles PURPOSE AND CONTENTS Roads Open to All Vehicles Seasonal Designation (See Table) America's Great Outdoors Great America's 39°52'30"N OF THIS MAP ! ! ! Dispersed Camping Golden Gate Canyon ! ! ! (See Dispersed Camping Table) State Park ! The designations shown on this motor vehicle use map ! 39°52'30"N ! are effective as of the date on the front cover and will Interstate ! ! 719.1C ! ! ! ! ! remain in effect until superseded by the next year's motor ! Highways, US, State ! 4N ! ! ! ! 7! ! 1 ! 9 ! . ! 1 ! +$ ! ! ! ! ! ! vehicle use map. It is the responsibility of the user to ! ! ! 7 ! ) ! Other Public Roads 1 ! ! ! 6 ! Dakota Hill ! acquire the current MVUM.This map shows the National ! ! ! . 1 70333 ! ! ! ! ! t ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! c ! . Short Route Identifier i ! ! r ! 3 t ! ! Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and ! ! 4 s ! ! Apex i ! ! ! 71 ! D ! $ t ! + ! r ! s ! ! ! ! # ! G e e ! ! the areas on National Forest System lands in the Clear Milepost Marker g r ! n o ! ! ! ! ! a F ! i R l ! l a ! G r n ! p e ! Creek Ranger District that are designated for motor vehicle ! d io 1 FS Campground l t . ! i u a ! 9 r 7 n o N ! ! ! use pursuant to 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) a B lt 7 1 7 e 5 ! ! ! n C v 3 ! e .
    [Show full text]