00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina I 00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina II 00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina III

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina I 00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina II 00-Romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina III 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina I 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina II 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina III ITALIA NAPOLEONICA Dizionario critico a cura di Luigi Mascilli Migliorini in collaborazione con Nicoletta Marini d’Armenia prefazione di Giuseppe Galasso presentazione di Rosanna Cioffi contributi di Francesco Barra, Maurizio Bossi, Giovanni Brancaccio Marina Caffiero, Maria Angela Caffio, Claudio Canonici Rosanna Cioffi, Antonino De Francesco, Renata De Lorenzo Paolo De Marco, Romano Gatto, Veronica Granata Andrea Giuntini, Virgilio Ilari, Marco Iuliano, Marco Manfredi Laura Melosi, Luigi Mascilli Migliorini, Paolo Mascilli Migliorini Francesco Mineccia, Maria Consiglia Napoli, Anna Maria Rao Lauro Rossi, Ornella Scognamiglio, Angelantonio Spagnoletti Massimo Visone, Alessandro Volpi 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina IV Il volume è stato realizzato con il contributo del Comitato Nazionale per le celebrazioni del Bicentenario del Decennio francese 1806-2006. Si ringraziano Giulio Massobrio e il Museo della Battaglia di Marengo per aver concesso l’utilizzo dell’immagine di copertina. UTET Libreria www.utetlibreria.it © 2011 UTET SpA I diritti di traduzione, di memorizzazione elettronica, di ripro- duzione e di adattamento totale o parziale, con qualsiasi mez- zo (compresi i microfilm e le copie fotostatiche) sono riservati per tutti i Paesi. Fotocopie per uso personale del lettore possono essere effet- tuate nei limiti del 15% di ciascun volume dietro pagamento al- la SIAE del compenso previsto dall’art. 68, comma 4, della legge 22 aprile 1941 n. 633 ovvero dall’accordo stipulato tra SIAE, AIE, SNS e CNA, CONFARTIGIANATO, CASA, CLAAI, CONFCOMMERCIO, CONFESERCENTI il 18 dicembre 2000. Le riproduzioni per uso differente da quello personale potranno avvenire, per un nu- mero di pagine non superiore al 15% del presente volume, so- lo a seguito di specifica autorizzazione rilasciata dall’Asso- ciazione Italiana per i Diritti di Riproduzione delle Opere del- l’ingegno (AIDRO), Corso di Porta Romana 108 - 20122 Milano - Tel. 02/89280804 - Fax 02/89280864 - e-mail: [email protected] Finito di stampare nel mese di gennaio 2011 da Litopres Druento (To), per conto della UTET Libreria Ristampe: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina V Indice IX Prefazione Giuseppe Galasso XV Nota del curatore XVII Presentazione Rossanna Cioffi 3 Amministrazione Angelantonio Spagnoletti Comune, p. 15 - Decurionato, p. 16 - Intendenza, p. 18 - Polizia, p. 19 - Prefet- tura, p. 20 - Provincia, p. 22 - Sindaci, p. 23 25 Arti Rosanna Cioffi Accademie d’arte, p. 37 - Architettura, p. 37 - Esposizioni d’arte, p. 38 - Feste e Apparati Festivi, p. 39 - Gran Premio di Roma, p. 40 - Impero (Stile, Gusto Decorativo), p. 41 - Musica, p. 42 - Pittura, p. 43 - Requisizioni, p. 44 - Roma Antica, p. 45 - Scultura, p. 46 - Teatro, p. 47 49 Avvenimenti Francesco Barra 91 Chiesa e vita religiosa Marina Caffiero Catechismo imperiale, p. 106 - Clero e giuramenti, p. 107 - Concordato del 1801, p. 109 - Concordato italiano del 1803, p. 111 - Ebrei, p. 113 - Episcopa- to, p. 115 - Papato, p. 116 119 Cinema Paolo De Marco 141 Città Paolo Mascilli Migliorini Il Foro, 162 - Il giardino, p. 163 - Milano, p. 164 - Napoli, p. 165 - Natura e paesaggio, p. 166 - Roma, p. 167 - Teorie urbanistiche, p. 168 171 Costituzioni e Codificazioni Antonino De Francesco Cassazione (Gran Corte di), p. 183 - Codice civile, p. 184 - Commissione feudale, p. 185 - Giustizia, p. 186 - Magistratura, p. 187 - Tribunali di commercio, p. 189 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina VI VI Indice 191 Economia Francesco Mineccia Beni nazionali, p. 208 - Blocco continentale, p. 209 - Catasto generale, p. 211 - Dazi e dogane, p. 212 - Feudalità, p. 215 - Imposte e tributi, p. 217 219 Editoria Maria Consiglia Napoli Diritto di autore, p. 231 233 Esercito Virgilio Ilari Cappellani militari, p. 245 - Gendarmeria, p. 245 - Guardia nazionale, p. 246 - Guardia reale, p. 247 - Legioni provinciali, p. 247 - Marina da guerra, p. 248 - Scuole militari, p. 249 251 Geopolitica Giovanni Brancaccio Corsica, p. 267 - Ionie (Isole), p. 268 - Lucca (Principato), p. 270 - Malta (Iso- la), p. 271 - Piemonte-Sardegna (Regno), p. 274 - Regno d’Italia, p. 276 - Regno di Napoli, p. 278 - Repubblica Italiana, p. 280 - Sicilia, p. 281 - Stato pontificio, p. 284 - Toscana, p. 285 - Venezia, p. 287 291 Lettere Laura Melosi 309 Luoghi di Memoria Luigi Mascilli Migliorini Arcole, p. 321 - Campoformio, p. 322 - Corsica, p. 322 - Elba (Isola), 323 - Ma- rengo, p. 324 327 Napoleonidi Renata De Lorenzo Carolina Bonaparte, p. 349 - Elisa Bonaparte, p. 350 - Eugenio di Beauharnais, p. 352 - Giuseppe Bonaparte, p. 354 - Gioacchino Murat, p. 356 - Paolina Bo- naparte, p. 358 361 Narrazioni Lauro Rossi Anno 1799, p. 375 - Campoformio, p. 376 - Esilio, p. 377 - Italiani in Spagna, p. 378 - Lazzari, p. 378 - Milano capitale, p. 379 - Prodigi, p. 380 - Proprietà, p. 381 - Spirito pubblico, p. 382 - Unità e indipendenza, p. 383 385 Scienze Romano Gatto Accademie scientifiche, p. 403 - Cartografia, p. 404 - Statistica, p. 406 409 Società Alessandro Volpi 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina VII Indice VII Brigantaggio, p. 419 - Élites, p. 420 - Massoneria, p. 422 - Mendicità, p. 423 - Nobiltà imperiale, p. 424 - Società segrete, p. 426 429 Territorio Andrea Giuntini Comunicazioni, p. 443 - Ingegneri, p. 444 - Porti, p. 446 449 Triennio repubblicano Anna Maria Rao Emigrazione ed esuli, p. 460 - Giacobinismo, p. 461 - Repubblica Cisalpina, p. 463 - Repubblica Cispadana, p. 464 - Repubblica Ligure, p. 465 - Repubblica Napoletana, p. 467 - Repubblica Romana, p. 468 471 Viaggi e Viaggiatori Maurizio Bossi 491 Bibliografia 519 Lemmario 521 Indice dei nomi 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina VIII 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina IX Prefazione Una tradizione consolidata e autorevole, sia politica sia storiografica, attribuiva alla discesa di Napoleone in Italia nel 1796 il valore di un evento decisivo e periodizzante. Era suonata allora – si diceva – la campana per l’ancien régime nella penisola. Era iniziata una storia nuova di mutamenti e di trasformazioni del paese, che, pressappoco in un quindicennio, ne avrebbe riformato radicalmente le strutture e le ripartizioni amministrative, la legislazione civile e penale, l’orga- nizzazione dei governi al centro e alla periferia, i criteri di selezione scolastica e non scolastica della classe dirigente, i rapporti fra Stato e Chiesa e la posizione della Chiesa nella società, il senso dell’apparte- nenza dei cittadini allo Stato e, anzi, alla società politica sia in gene- rale che in quanto distinguibile dalla società civile. A indicare una così ampia azione appariva insufficiente la defini- zione di «monarchia amministrativa», con la quale si designava il re- gime politico-istituzionale introdotto da Napoleone in Italia, così co- me in tanta altra parte d’Europa, a cominciare dalla Francia. Il rin- novamento e le trasformazioni napoleoniche non avevano investito soltanto la sfera politica, gli ordinamenti e le istituzioni cui essi si ar- ticolavano. In altri termini, non avevano riguardato soltanto la strut- tura e l’organizzazione del potere, né soltanto il rapporto fra potere e istituzioni. Erano, invece, penetrati in profondità nella vita della so- cietà, nel suo configurarsi a livello sia pubblico sia privato. Insomma, un effetto ritardato di quello sconvolgimento per cui in Francia la grande révolution aveva fatto crollare l’intero edificio degli antichi or- dini e aveva instaurato un nuovo e più moderno sistema politico e so- ciale dalle amplissime e profonde implicazioni in tutta la vita civile. Un effetto, poi, neppure tanto ritardato. Napoleone (allora anco- ra Buonaparte) era disceso in Italia a soli sette anni dalla Rivoluzio- ne in Francia. Vi era tornato (e già si denominava Bonaparte, con una vistosa francesizzazione del suo nome di famiglia) cinque anni dopo, nel 1801; e vi sarebbe ancora tornato, dopo altri quattro anni, nel 1805, per assumere (ormai sovrano designato col solo nome perso- nale) la corona del Regno d’Italia, da lui stesso istituito. 00-romane 13-01-2011 14:31 Pagina X X Prefazione In questa linea tradizionale di interpretazione del ruolo di Napo- leone nella storia d’Italia, i tre anni di rivoluzioni e sconvolgimenti seguiti alla sua prima discesa nella penisola – il cosiddetto «triennio giacobino», dal 1796 al 1799 – avevano minore importanza del suc- cessivo quindicennio, 1801-1815, in cui – tra Regno d’Italia, annes- sioni alla Francia o, meglio, Impero Francese di cui era sovrano, e re- gimi da lui imposti in altre parti d’Italia, in particolare a Napoli – l’a- zione italiana di Napoleone era stata costante e diretta e aveva essa, propriamente, prodotto i mutamenti e le trasformazioni che abbiamo di sopra indicato. Nella stessa linea, gli anni napoleonici non erano definiti soltanto da questo insieme di effetti, per più o meno profondi che fossero. Vi era stato, allora, di più. Si riteneva, infatti, che fosse allora iniziata una parte più attiva degli italiani nelle vicende del loro paese, e ciò sotto il sogno delle idee nuove che la Rivoluzione francese prima e Napoleone poi avevano diffuso e affermato in mezza Europa. Era, propriamente, iniziato il Risorgimento, lo sforzo, cioè, degli italiani di riportare il loro paese a una condizione politica e civile che si av- vertiva perduta, nel contesto europeo, da due o tre secoli. Non solo l’indipendenza politica, l’affrancamento dalle sovranità straniere do- minanti nella penisola fin dai primi anni del Cinquecento, ma ad- dirittura l’idea dell’unità italiana si era affacciata in quegli anni, a iniziativa dei «patrioti» napoletani, ma con grande eco a Milano e al- trove. E, quasi simbolo di tutto ciò, era nata pure a Reggio Emilia, nel 1797, la bandiera italiana, il tricolore che poi, a Risorgimento con- cluso, sarebbe rimasto come bandiera nazionale. Il nome stesso di «patrioti», col quale erano designati e si desi- gnavano i fautori della Rivoluzione e dei nuovi regimi che ne nasce- vano, appariva un nome significativo.
Recommended publications
  • Process Dynamics 1 Battle of Trafalgar (1805)
    2015 Practice 1 Process dynamics Process Dynamics (W.L. Luyben) Approximate description of the battle with a continuous process. Simulate the processes A, B, C, answer the questions, provide graphs. 1 Battle of Trafalgar (1805) 32 ships led by Admiral Lord Nelson against 38 ships of the line under French Admiral Pierre- Charles Villeneuve. Ship’s destruction speed during the battle is proportional to the number of enemy ships, on the average any ship can be destroyed for a half of the day. 1. battle • Write the equation. Provide solution depending on time N(t);V (t) graphically. • Who will win? (Victory if number of enemy’s vessels = 0). How many ships should be in order to win the battle? Try system with the following parameters (a12 = 2:5; a21 = 3:8), answer the questions. • How big are the losses, how long the battle lasts? • How can ships’ destruction speed change the result? • What is the process statics (equilibrium point)? • Is the process stable or not? Calculate the eigenvalues of the system. • Provide process trajectory in the state space (N, V) and several more with other initial values (in the same graph). Find eigenvalues of the system. 2 Battle of the Atlantic (World War II) Battle between German submarines (U = 247) and British destroyers (D = 132). Ship’s destruction speed during the battle is proportional to the number of enemy ships, on the average one ship destroys 0.25 of the enemy’s ship per week. Germany produces two submarines a week. • How many destroyers a week to be produced in England in order to achieve victory in the battle? • Provide the equation to solve U(t);D(t).
    [Show full text]
  • From Valmy to Waterloo: France at War, 1792–1815
    Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to Universitetsbiblioteket i Tromsoe - PalgraveConnect - 2011-03-08 - PalgraveConnect Tromsoe i - licensed to Universitetsbiblioteket www.palgraveconnect.com material from Copyright 10.1057/9780230294981 - From Valmy to Waterloo, Marie-Cecile Thoral War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850 Series Editors: Rafe Blaufarb (Tallahassee, USA), Alan Forrest (York, UK), and Karen Hagemann (Chapel Hill, USA) Editorial Board: Michael Broers (Oxford, UK), Christopher Bayly (Cambridge, UK), Richard Bessel (York, UK), Sarah Chambers (Minneapolis, USA), Laurent Dubois (Durham, USA), Etienne François (Berlin, Germany), Janet Hartley (London, UK), Wayne Lee (Chapel Hill, USA), Jane Rendall (York, UK), Reinhard Stauber (Klagenfurt, Austria) Titles include: Richard Bessel, Nicholas Guyatt and Jane Rendall (editors) WAR, EMPIRE AND SLAVERY, 1770–1830 Alan Forrest and Peter H. Wilson (editors) THE BEE AND THE EAGLE Napoleonic France and the End of the Holy Roman Empire, 1806 Alan Forrest, Karen Hagemann and Jane Rendall (editors) SOLDIERS, CITIZENS AND CIVILIANS Experiences and Perceptions of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1790–1820 Karen Hagemann, Gisela Mettele and Jane Rendall (editors) GENDER, WAR AND POLITICS Transatlantic Perspectives, 1755–1830 Marie-Cécile Thoral FROM VALMY TO WATERLOO France at War, 1792–1815 Forthcoming: Michael Broers, Agustin Guimera and Peter Hick (editors) THE NAPOLEONIC EMPIRE AND THE NEW EUROPEAN POLITICAL CULTURE Alan Forrest, Etienne François and Karen Hagemann
    [Show full text]
  • Wars and Battles of Modern Europe Battle Summaries Are from Harbottle's Dictionary of Battles, Published by Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1904
    WARS AND BATTLES OF MODERN EUROPE BATTLE SUMMARIES ARE FROM HARBOTTLE'S DICTIONARY OF BATTLES, PUBLISHED BY SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO., 1904. War of Austrian Succession (1740-48) Seven Year's War (1752-62) French Revolutionary Wars (1785-99) Napoleonic Wars (1801-15) Peninsular War (1808-14) Italian Unification (1848-67) Hungarian Rising (1849) Franco-Mexican War (1862-67) Schleswig-Holstein War (1864) Austro Prussian War (1866) Franco Prussian War (1870-71) Servo-Bulgarian Wars (1885) Balkan Wars (1912-13) Great War (1914-18) WAR OF THE AUSTRIAN SUCCESSION —1740 TO 1748 Frederick the Great annexes Silesia to his domains in opposition to the claims of Austria 1741 Battle of Molwitz (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought April 8, 1741, between the Prussians, 30,000 strong, under Frederick the Great, and the Austrians, under Marshal Neuperg. Frederick surprised the Austrian general, and, after severe fighting, drove him from his entrenchments, with a loss of about 5,000 killed, wounded and prisoners. The Prussians lost 2,500. 1742 Battle of Czaslau (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought 1742, between the Prussians under Frederic the Great, and the Austrians under Prince Charles of Lorraine. The Prussians were driven from the field, but the Austrians abandoned the pursuit to plunder, and the king, rallying his troops, broke the Austrian main body, and defeated them with a loss of 4,000 men. 1742 Battle of Chotusitz (Austria vs. Prussia) Prussians victory Fought May 17, 1742, between the Austrians under Prince Charles of Lorraine, and the Prussians under Frederick the Great. The numbers were about equal, but the steadiness of the Prussian infantry eventually wore down the Austrians, and they were forced to retreat, though in good order, leaving behind them 18 guns and 12,000 prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Nelson and the Battle of Trafalgar
    Lord Nelson and the Battle of Trafalgar Lord Nelson and the early years Horatio Nelson was born in Norfolk in 1758. As a young child he wasn’t particularly healthy but he still went on to become one of Britain’s greatest heroes. Nelson’s father, Edmund Nelson, was the Rector of Burnham Thorpe, the small Norfolk village in which they lived. His mother died when he was only 9 years old. Nelson came from a very big family – huge in fact! He was the sixth of 11 children. He showed an early love for the sea, joining the navy at the age of just 12 on a ship captained by his uncle. Nelson must have been good at his job because he became a captain at the age of 20. He was one of the youngest-ever captains in the Royal Navy. Nelson married Frances Nisbet in 1787 on the Caribbean island of Nevis. Although Nelson was married to Frances, he fell in love with Lady Hamilton in Naples in Italy. They had a child together, Horatia in 1801. Lord Nelson, the Sailor Britain was at war during much of Nelson’s life so he spent many years in battle and during that time he became ill (he contracted malaria), was seriously injured. As well as losing the sight in his right eye he lost one arm and nearly lost the other – and finally, during his most famous battle, he lost his life. Nelson’s job helped him see the world. He travelled to the Caribbean, Denmark and Egypt to fight battles and also sailed close to the North Pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborators, Collaboration, and the Problems of Empire in Napoleonic Italy, the Oppizzoni Affair, –
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:./SX COLLABORATORS, COLLABORATION, AND THE PROBLEMS OF EMPIRE IN NAPOLEONIC ITALY, THE OPPIZZONI AFFAIR, – * AMBROGIO A. CAIANI University of Kent ABSTRACT. The recent bicentennial commemorations of the Napoleonic empire have witnessed a proliferation of new studies. Scholars now possess much more sophisticated conceptual tools than in past decades with which to gauge the problems faced by French imperial administrators throughout Europe. Well-trodden concepts, like centre/periphery or collaboration/resistance, have been reinvigo- rated by more sophisticated understandings of how rulers and ruled interacted in the early nineteenth century. This article argues that, while much progress has been made in understanding problems of ‘resistance’, there is more to be said about the other side of the same coin, namely: ‘collaboration’. Using the micro/local history of a scandal in Napoleonic Bologna, this article wishes to reaffirm that collaboration was an active agent that shaped, and often shook, the French imperial project. The biggest problem remained that, despite ‘good intentions’, collaborators sometimes simply did not collaborate with each other. After all, imperial clients were determined to benefit from the experience of empire. The centre was often submerged by local petty squabbles. This article will use a specific micro-history in Bologna to highlight the extent to which Napoleonic empire builders had to thread a fine line between the impracticalities of direct control and the dangers of ‘going native’.
    [Show full text]
  • Simona Negruzzo the ARCHIGINNASIO, the SEAT OF
    65 Simona Negruzzo THE ARCHIGINNASIO, THE SEat OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA IN MODERN TIMES The Alma Mater Studiorum of Bologna, believed to be the first university in the Western world, began its life towards the end of the 11th century, when the masters of grammar, rhetoric and logic opened a school of juridical studies. Thereafter, teaching independent of the ecclesiastical schools became rooted in the city and the school became famous beyond its borders due to some of its most illustrious masters, such as the glossarist Irnerius and his disciples and followers (Bulgarus, Martinus Gosia, Jacobus and Hugo de Porta Ravennate).1 Originally, the free collectio of funds among the disciples guaranteed the teaching. However, there was no regular method of financing until the municipality of Bologna assumed responsibility for the costs and thereby stabilised the city’s schools; Frederick Barbarossa also moved to protect the young institution with an Imperial Constitution (1158) that was supposed to safeguard the teaching from the intrusion of external authorities and scholares who were travelling for reasons of study. Moreover, the students themselves gained strength based on their origins: on the one hand, there was the Citramontani (from near the Alps on the Italian peninsula, but not the Bolognese, Lombards, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2018.15.06 A special thanks to Ilaria Maggiulli and Ugo Dovere. 1 Cf. Enrico Spagnesi, Wernerius Bononiensis iudex. La figura storica d’Irnerio (Firenze: Olschki, 1970). 66 SIMONA NEGRUZZO Tuscans or Romans), and on the other, the Ultramontani (non-Italians living beyond the Alps, including the French, Spanish, Provencal, English, Picards, Burgundians, Normans, Catalans, Hungarians, Poles, Germans, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Charles Schneid
    1 Frederick Charles Schneid Department of History High Point University High Point, NC, 27262 (336) 841-9238 [email protected] Education: Ph.D. May 1993 Purdue University M.A. May 1990 Purdue University B.A. May 1988 State University of New York at Binghamton. Professional Employment: 2011 – Present High Point University Chair, Department of History 2003 – Present High Point University Professor, Department of History 2000 - 2010 High Point University Director, University Honors Program 1998 - 2003 High Point University Associate Professor, Department of History 1994 - 1998 High Point University Assistant Professor, Department of History 1993 - 1994 Purdue University Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History 1992 - 1993 Purdue University Instructor, Department of History Books Authored: The French-Piedmontese Campaign of 1859, (Rome: Ufficio Storico Stato Maggiore Esercito, 2014). The Second War of Italian Unification (London: Osprey, 2012). The Napoleonic Wars – Essential Bibliography Series (Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2012). Napoleon’s Conquest of Europe: The War of the Third Coalition 1805 (Westport: Praeger, 2005). Napoleon's Italian Campaigns, 1805-1815 (Westport: Praeger, 2002). Soldiers of Napoleon's Kingdom of Italy: Army State and Society, 1800-1815 (Boulder: Westview /Harper Collins, 1995). Books Edited: 2 ed., Armies of the French Revolution, 1789-1799 (Norman: Oklahoma University Press, forthcoming 2016). ed., The Projection and Limitations of Imperial Powers: 1660-1850 (Leiden: Brill, 2012). edited with Michael Pavkovic and Susan Nicassio, Consortium on Revolutionary Europe, Selected Papers 2003 (Tallahassee, FL.: 2012). ed., European Politics 1815-1848 (Ashgate: Harlow, 2011). edited with Donald Stoker and Harold Blanton, Conscription in Napoleonic Europe, 1799-1815: A Revolution in Military Affairs? (London: Routledge, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Hmic-2005 ISSN 1696-4403
    Revista HMiC-2005 ISSN 1696-4403 http://seneca.uab.es/hmic EQUIP REVISTA HMiC Equip Editor: Departament d'Història Moderna i Contemporànea. Consell de redacció: Agustí Alcoberro (Universitat de Barcelona), Alejandro Andreassi (Univeritat Autònoma de Barcelona), Ramón Alquézar (UAB), Esteban Canales (UAB), Angel Duarte (Universitat de Girona), Monsterrat Duc (Universitat de Rovira i Virgili), Francesc Espinet Burunat (UAB), Anna Maria Garcia (Universitat de Girona), Miquel Izard (Universitat de Barcelona), Montserrat Jiménez Sureda (UAB), Josep Lladonosa (Universitat de Lleida), Bernat Muniesa (Universitat de Barcelona), Maria Antònia Martí Escayol (UAB), Josep Lluís Martín Ramos (UAB), Josep Maria Tomas (Universitat Rovira i Virgili). Cap de redacció: Maria Antònia Martí Escayol (UAB). Web-master: Maria Antònia Martí Escayol, Xavier Ortega Castillo. Maqueta número recopilatori i il·lustracions: Xavier Ortega Castillo. ISSN: 1445-89111 Adreça electrònica: http://seneca.uab.es/hmic 1 Contacte editorial Postal: Revista HMiC Departament d'Història Moderna i Contemporània Facultat de Lletres Edifici B Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 08193 Bellaterra-Cerdanyola del Vallès Correu electrònic: [email protected] Telèfon: 93 581 11 86 El contingut de la Revista HMiC, si no s'especifica el contrari, pot utilitzarse de conformitat amb la llicencia de Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/es/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/es/deed.en ÍNDEX DE CONTINGUTS EQUIP REVISTA HMiC 1 ÍNDEX DE CONTINGUTS 2 EDITORIAL
    [Show full text]
  • 133 Compressed.Pdf
    Lim Antiqua s.a.s - Studio bibliografico Via della Chiesa IX, 44 Loc. Monte San Quirico 55100 LUCCA Telefono e Fax +39 0583 34 2218 (dalle 9 alle 13) +39 333 2551758 www.limantiqua.com/it email: [email protected] P. IVA 01286300460 Dati per bonifico: C/C postale n. 11367554 IBAN: IT 67 Q 07601 13700 000011367554 BIC: BPPIITRRXXX Orario di apertura Lunedì – Venerdì ore 9.00/14.00 Gli ordini possono essere effettuati per telefono, email o via fax. Il pagamento può avvenire tramite contrassegno, bollettino postale, bonifico sul conto postale o PayPal. Le spese di spedizione sono a carico del destinatario. I prezzi indicati sono comprensivi di IVA. Gli ordini saranno ritenuti validi e quindi evasi anche in caso di disponibilità parziale dei pezzi richiesti. Rari Autografi 1. Antonio Aldini (Bologna 1755 - Pavia 1826) Napoleonica Lettera autografa firmata, dat. 23 genn. 1807 Bologna, dell'uomo politico e avvocato, nipote di Luigi Galvani, docente di diritto presso l'università di Bologna e fervente seguace di Napoleone Bonaparte (ebbe importanti incarichi nella Repubblica Cisalpina e partecipò all'incoronazione di quest'ultimo a Re d'Italia nel 1805, ove ebbe l'onore di portare lo scettro), relativa ad una compravendita di beni fondiari. Una p. in-8. € 100 1. Antonio Aldini 2. Vincenzo Antinori (Firenze 1792 - ivi 1865) Scienze - Firenze Due lettere autografe firmate risalenti al biennio 1845-46, dell'illustre scienziato, direttore del museo di fisica e storia naturale di Firenze dal 1829 al 1859, noto ricercatore nel campo dell'elettromagnetismo e accademico della Crusca, dirette al botanico lucchese Benedetto Puccinelli (1808-1850), su alcuni volumi ricevuti da quest'ultimo come dono per S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vico, Hegel and a New Historicism
    Hegelians on the Slopes of Vesuvius: A Transnational Study in the Intellectual History of Naples, 1799-1861 Alessandro De Arcangelis, University College London Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University College London, April 2018 I, Alessandro De Arcangelis, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to all the people who supported me in this challenging and exciting journey and contributed, in many ways, to its development and completion. Working with my main supervisor, Prof. Axel Körner, has been a terrific experience and I am deeply grateful for his undefeated enthusiasm, impeccable support, steady encouragement and, above all, for offering me so many opportunities to grow as a researcher. My second supervisor, Prof. Avi Lifschitz, has always been a dedicated mentor, whose point of view has been helping me improve my way of engaging with intellectual history since the very first day of my MA degree in 2013. I genuinely hope that the future may hold many more opportunities for me to work with them. A special mention goes to Dr. Fernanda Gallo: our common passion for Neapolitan Hegelianism has introduced us to a priceless friendship and enabled us to work together on several projects during the last year. Dr. Maurizio Isabella provided me with useful comments that greatly helped my argument to come into focus, as did Prof. Gareth Stedman Jones in 2015 and 2017. I also want to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Aneurin
    The Aneurin Great War Project: Timeline Part 6 - The Georgian Wars, 1764 to 1815 Copyright Notice: This material was written and published in Wales by Derek J. Smith (Chartered Engineer). It forms part of a multifile e-learning resource, and subject only to acknowledging Derek J. Smith's rights under international copyright law to be identified as author may be freely downloaded and printed off in single complete copies solely for the purposes of private study and/or review. Commercial exploitation rights are reserved. The remote hyperlinks have been selected for the academic appropriacy of their contents; they were free of offensive and litigious content when selected, and will be periodically checked to have remained so. Copyright © 2013-2021, Derek J. Smith. First published 09:00 BST 30th May 2013. This version 09:00 GMT 20th January 2021 [BUT UNDER CONSTANT EXTENSION AND CORRECTION, SO CHECK AGAIN SOON] This timeline supports the Aneurin series of interdisciplinary scientific reflections on why the Great War failed so singularly in its bid to be The War to End all Wars. It presents actual or best-guess historical event and introduces theoretical issues of cognitive science as they become relevant. UPWARD Author's Home Page Project Aneurin, Scope and Aims Master References List BACKWARD IN TIME Part 1 - (Ape)men at War, Prehistory to 730 Part 2 - Royal Wars (Without Gunpowder), 731 to 1272 Part 3 - Royal Wars (With Gunpowder), 1273-1602 Part 4 - The Religious Civil Wars, 1603-1661 Part 5 - Imperial Wars, 1662-1763 FORWARD IN TIME Part
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborators, Collaboration, and the Problems of Empire in Napoleonic Italy, the Oppizzoni Affair, –
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:./SX COLLABORATORS, COLLABORATION, AND THE PROBLEMS OF EMPIRE IN NAPOLEONIC ITALY, THE OPPIZZONI AFFAIR, – * AMBROGIO A. CAIANI University of Kent ABSTRACT. The recent bicentennial commemorations of the Napoleonic empire have witnessed a proliferation of new studies. Scholars now possess much more sophisticated conceptual tools than in past decades with which to gauge the problems faced by French imperial administrators throughout Europe. Well-trodden concepts, like centre/periphery or collaboration/resistance, have been reinvigo- rated by more sophisticated understandings of how rulers and ruled interacted in the early nineteenth century. This article argues that, while much progress has been made in understanding problems of ‘resistance’, there is more to be said about the other side of the same coin, namely: ‘collaboration’. Using the micro/local history of a scandal in Napoleonic Bologna, this article wishes to reaffirm that collaboration was an active agent that shaped, and often shook, the French imperial project. The biggest problem remained that, despite ‘good intentions’, collaborators sometimes simply did not collaborate with each other. After all, imperial clients were determined to benefit from the experience of empire. The centre was often submerged by local petty squabbles. This article will use a specific micro-history in Bologna to highlight the extent to which Napoleonic empire builders had to thread a fine line between the impracticalities of direct control and the dangers of ‘going native’.
    [Show full text]