Infamous Wildland Fires Around the World by Calendar Date Compiled by Bill Gabbert Revised July 2, 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies. -
Agricultural Sector Survey
Report No. 1684-TU Turkey Agricultural Sector Survey (In Two Volumes) Public Disclosure Authorized Volume II: Annexes June 23, 1978 Projects Department Europe, Middle East and North Africa Regional Office FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank This docUment has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents mray not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS- DECEMBER 1976 / US$1.00 = 16.5 Turkish Lira (LT) LT 1.00 = us$o.o6 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System British/US System 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds 1 metric ton (ton) = 2,205 pounds 1 millimeter (mm) = 0.04 inch 1 meter (m) = 3.28 feet 1 kilometer (km) = 0.62 mile 1 hectare (ha)=10 deca es (da) = 2.47 acre 1 square kilometer (kmc) = 0.386 square mile 1 liter (1) = 0.264 gallon 1 cubic meter (m3 ) = 35.28 cubic feet 1 million cubic meters (Mm3) = 810.7 acre feet 1 liter per second (1/sec) = 0.04 cubic feet per second GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS DSI - Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources' General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works EBK - Meat and Fish Organization FFYP - First Five-Year Plan (1963-1967) LRO - Land Reform Organization MA - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock MF - Ministry of Forestry MVA - Ministry of Village Affairs SEE - State Economic Enterprise SFYP - Second Five-Year Plan (1968-1972) SIS - State Institute of Statistics SPO - State Planning Organization TCZB - Agricultural Bank TEK - Turkish Electricity Authority TFYP - Third Five-Year Plan (1973-1977) TMO - Soil Products Office TOPRAKSU- MVA's General Directorate of Land and Water Resources Development TSEK - Milk Organization TSF - Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation TZDK - Agricultural Supply Organization GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY FISCAL YEAR March 1 - February 28 LI At the time of the mission's visit to Turkey, On March 31, 1978, the exchange rate was US$1,00 = 25,25 LT. -
Post-Fire Treatment Effectiveness for Hillslope Stabilization
United States Department of Agriculture Post-Fire Treatment Forest Service Rocky Mountain Effectiveness for Research Station General Technical Hillslope Stabilization Report RMRS-GTR-240 August 2010 Peter R. Robichaud, Louise E. Ashmun, and Bruce D. Sims A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE Robichaud, Peter R.; Ashmun, Louise E.; Sims, Bruce D. 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hill- slope stabilization. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. Abstract This synthesis of post-fire treatment effectiveness reviews the past decade of research, monitoring, and product development related to post-fire hillslope emergency stabilization treatments, including erosion barri- ers, mulching, chemical soil treatments, and combinations of these treatments. In the past ten years, erosion barrier treatments (contour-felled logs and straw wattles) have declined in use and are now rarely applied as a post-fire hillslope treatment. In contrast, dry mulch treatments (agricultural straw, wood strands, wood shreds, etc.) have quickly gained acceptance as effective, though somewhat expensive, post-fire hillslope stabilization treatments and are frequently recommended when values-at-risk warrant protection. This change has been motivated by research that shows the proportion of exposed mineral soil (or conversely, the propor- tion of ground cover) to be the primary treatment factor controlling post-fire hillslope erosion. Erosion barrier treatments provide little ground cover and have been shown to be less effective than mulch, especially during short-duration, high intensity rainfall events. In addition, innovative options for producing and applying mulch materials have adapted these materials for use on large burned areas that are inaccessible by road. -
Community Wildfire Protection Plan and Other Natural Disasters
Laguna Beach Community Wildfire Protection Plan And Other Natural Disasters Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 1. Laguna Beach History......................................................................................................... 3 2. Covered Area ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. CWPP Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 II. CITY RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................. 3 1. Fire ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Floods ................................................................................................................................ 39 3. Tsunamis ........................................................................................................................... 41 4. Earthquakes ....................................................................................................................... 47 5. Evacuation Plan ................................................................................................................ 53 III. PUBLIC RESOURCES ................................................................................................... -
Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. -
Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire
Forest Service Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center Wildland Fire Program 2016 Annual Report Weber Basin Job Corps: Above Average Performance In an Above Average Fire Season Brandon J. Everett, Job Corps Forest Area Fire Management Officer, Uinta-Wasatch–Cache National Forest-Weber Basin Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center The year 2016 was an above average season for the Uinta- Forest Service Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Job Corps Participating in nearly every fire on the forest, the Weber Basin Fire Program Job Corps Civilian Conservation Statistics Center (JCCCC) fire program assisted in finance, fire cache and camp support, structure 1,138 students red- preparation, suppression, moni- carded for firefighting toring and rehabilitation. and camp crews Weber Basin firefighters re- sponded to 63 incidents, spend- Weber Basin Job Corps students, accompanied by Salt Lake Ranger District Module Supervisor David 412 fire assignments ing 338 days on assignment. Inskeep, perform ignition operation on the Bear River RX burn on the Bear River Bird Refuge. October 2016. Photo by Standard Examiner. One hundred and twenty-four $7,515,675.36 salary majority of the season commit- The Weber Basin Job Corps fire camp crews worked 148 days paid to students on ted to the Weber Basin Hand- program continued its partner- on assignment. Altogether, fire crew. This crew is typically orga- ship with Wasatch Helitack, fire assignments qualified students worked a nized as a 20 person Firefighter detailing two students and two total of 63,301 hours on fire Type 2 (FFT2) IA crew staffed staff to that program. Another 3,385 student work assignments during the 2016 with administratively deter- student worked the entire sea- days fire season. -
Kneeland Helitack Base
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal (COBCP) - Cover Sheet DF-151 (REV 07/20) Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. 2021 3540 Forestry and Fire MA-12 Protection Budget Request Name Capital Outlay Program ID Capital Outlay Project ID 3540-078-COBCP-2021-GB 2485 0006682 Project Title Kneeland Helitack Base: Relocate Facility Project Status and Type Status: ☒ New ☐ Continuing Type: ☒Major ☐ Minor Project Category (Select one) ☐CRI ☐WSD ☐ECP ☐SM (Critical Infrastructure) (Workload Space Deficiencies) (Enrollment Caseload Population) (Seismic) ☒FLS ☐FM ☐PAR ☐RC (Fire Life Safety) (Facility Modernization) (Public Access Recreation) (Resource Conservation) Total Request (in thousands) Phase(s) to be Funded Total Project Cost (in thousands) $ 850 Acquisition $ 18,285 Budget Request Summary The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) requests $850,000 General Fund for the acquisition phase of the Kneeland Helitack Base: Relocate Facility project, located in Humboldt County. This is a new project. Total estimated project costs are $18,285,000. Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed CCCI ☐ Yes ☒ No Click or tap here to enter text. 6596 Requires Provisional Language Budget Package Status ☐ Yes ☒ No ☒ Needed ☐ Not Needed ☐ Existing Impact on Support Budget One-Time Costs ☐ Yes ☒ No Swing Space Needed ☐ Yes ☒ No Future Savings ☒ Yes ☐ No Generate Surplus Property ☒ Yes ☐ No Future Costs ☒ Yes ☐ No If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? ☐ Yes ☐ No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee. Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date Click or tap here to enter text. -
Wildfires City of Newport Beach, California SECTION 8: WILDFIRES
Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Section 8 – Wildfires City of Newport Beach, California SECTION 8: WILDFIRES Table of Contents Why Are Wildfires a Threat to Newport Beach? ............................................ 8-1 Historic Fires in Newport Beach and Vicinity ......................................................................... 8-1 Historic Fires in California ............................................................................................................ 8-2 Wildfire Characteristics ..................................................................................... 8-6 The Interface ................................................................................................................................... 8-6 Fuel ..................................................................................................................................................... 8-7 Topography ...................................................................................................................................... 8-7 Weather ............................................................................................................................................ 8-8 Urban Development ....................................................................................................................... 8-8 Wildfire Hazard Identification and Regulatory Context................................. 8-9 HUD Study System ....................................................................................................................... -
The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting. -
Major Fires in San Diego County History
Major fires in San Diego County history September 1913: Barona fire burned 65,470 acres. September 1928: Witch Creek fire near Santa Ysabel charred 33,240 acres. September 1928: Beauty Peak fire near the Riverside County border in the North County blackened 67,000 acres. October 1943: Hauser Creek fire in the Cleveland National Forest, at least 9 firefighters dead (including 7 marines), 72 injuries and 10,000 acres burned. August 1944: Laguna Junction fire burned 60,000 acres August 1950: Conejos Fire charred 64,000 acres. [Month unknown] 1952: Cuyamaca fire burned 64,000 acres November 1956: Inaja fire killed 11 firefighters and burned 43,904 acres near Julian. September 26-Oct. 3 1970: The Laguna fire, the county's largest fire in modern times, burned 175,425 acres, killed eight people and destroyed 382 homes. In 24 hours the fire burned from near Mount Laguna into the outskirts of El Cajon and Spring Valley. September 1978: PSA Crash in North Park June 1985: Normal Heights fire destroyed or damaged 116 houses, causing $8.6 million in damage. October 1993: Guejito fire east of Escondido charred 20,000 acres and destroyed 18 houses. Estimated $1.25 million damage. October 1996: Harmony Grove fire burned 8,600 acres, from Harmony Grove west of Escondido to La Costa, destroying nearly 110 homes and killing one man. August 1997: Lake Wohlford fire northeast of Escondido - an arson blaze - destroyed seven houses and burned 500 acres. October 1999: La Jolla Fire (La Jolla Indian Reservation) burned approximately 7,800 acres and 1 firefighter died. -
Nc Math 3.Indd
CHAPTER 9 Geometric Modeling 9.1 Modeling with Area ..........................................................................................341 9.2 Modeling with Volume ......................................................................................347 9.3 Cross Sections of Solids ..................................................................................355 9.4 Solids of Revolution .........................................................................................361 Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC 339 All rights reserved. Name _________________________________________________________ Date __________ Chapter Maintaining Mathematical Proficiency 9 Find the area of the circle or regular polygon. 1. 2. 3.7 ft 4.7 in. 5 ft 3. a circle with a diameter of 74.6 centimeters 4. a regular hexagon with a perimeter of 42 yards and an apothem of 4.25 yards 5. a circle with a circumference of 24π meters Find the surface area and volume of the solid. 6. 7. 35 cm 8 in. 6 in. 28 cm 12 in. 8. 9. 37 m 58 yd 23 m Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC All rights reserved. 340 Name _________________________________________________________ Date _________ Modeling with Area 9.1 For use with Exploration 9.1 Essential Question How can you use the population and area of a region to describe how densely the region is populated? 1 EXPLORATION: Exploring Population and Area Work with a partner. Use the Internet to find the population and land area of each county in California. Then find the number of people per square mile for each county. a. Mendocino County b. Lake County c. Yolo County d. Napa County e. Sonoma County f. Marin County Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC 341 All rights reserved. Name _________________________________________________________ Date __________ 9.1 Modeling with Area (continued) 2 EXPLORATION: Analyzing Population and Area Work with a partner. -
Lessons from the October 2003 Wildfires in Southern California
Lessons from the October 2003 Wildfires in Southern California Jon E. Keeley, C.J. Fotheringham, and Max A. Moritz The Southern California fires of late Oct. 2003 burned 742,000 ac and destroyed 3,361 homes is the focus of this article. and 26 lives. Factors leading up to this event were very different between forests, which com- prised about 5% of the area burned, and shrublands. Three lessons are (1) although these Separating Forest Fires from Shrubland fires were massive, they were not unprecedented, and future fires of this magnitude are to be Burning expected; (2) the current fire management policy is not effective at preventing these massive These southern California fires fires; and (3) future developments need to plan for these natural fire events much the same burned through diverse plant commu- way we currently incorporate engineering solutions to earthquakes and other natural cata- nities. The proportion of different veg- strophes. etation types was not proportional to ABSTRACT the media coverage and thus there is widespread belief that these were forest Keywords: firestorm; fuel mosaics; historical fires; Santa Ana winds; policy fires. However, coniferous forests com- prised only about 5% of the total acreage burned (frap.cdf.ca.gov). he southern California fires of interface. A total of 3,361 homes and 26 Media focus on these forest fires was late Oct. 2003 were, cumula- lives were lost in this event. It is without undoubtedly due to the fact that they Ttively, the single largest event in a doubt the costliest disaster to befall burned in unnaturally intense and California’s recent history.