DOCSLIB.ORG

Seatac APM Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seatac APM Executive Summary SeaTac People Mover Study Final Report Prepared by 'BRill BRW, Inc. In Association with Bruce C. Allen & Associates, Inc. Berk & Associates, Inc. Decision Economincs, Inc. Inca Engineers KJS Associates, Inc. William A. Wilde Zimmer, Gunsul, Frasca Partnership February 1992 SEATAC PEOPLE MOVER STUDY STEERING COMMITTEE William R. Eager Christina T. Deffebach Project Manager and Capital Project Coordinator Steering Committee Chairman Metro IDA, Inc. 821 Second Avenue, MS 151 615 Second Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 Seattle, WA 98104 684-1646 682-4750 David A. Cantey Michael Knapp Community Development Supervisor . Director of Planning/Community Dev. City of SeaTac City of SeaTac 19215 28th Avenue South 19215 28th Avenue South SeaTac, WA 98188 SeaTac, WA 98188 878-9100 878-9100 Dennis Olson Lisa Holliday Alaska Airlines Alaska Airlines 19300 Pacific Highway South 19300 Pacific Highway South Seattle, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98188 431-7236 431-7236 Burr Stewart Roy Moore Aviation Planning R & S Consultants Port of Seattle 19215 28th Avenue South Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Seattle, WA 98188 P.O. Box 68727 824-0113 Seattle, WA 98168 433-4633 Tack McCullough Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe Ms. Gerry HeckendOrn-Poor 6100 Columbia Seafirst Center Planner II Seattle, WA 98104 Port of Seattle 447-0900 Seattle...,Tacoma International Airport P.O. Box 68727 Tom Dantzler Seattle, WA 98168 Equitable Capital Group, Inc. 248-6866 19550 Pacific Highway South, #200 Seattle, WA 98188 Dan Burke 824-3160 King County King County Administration Building Liz Sroufe 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 976 Equitable Capital Group, Inc. Seattle, WA 98104 19550 Pacific Highway South, #200 296-6531 Seattle, WA 98188 824-3160 Steve Lindberg SeaTac Red Lion Hotel The Honorable Leo Thorsness 18740 Pacific Highway South Washington State Senate Seattle, WA 98188 Eleventh Legislative District 246-8600 212 Wells Street Renton, WA 98057 Robert W, Southall 786-7616/0Iympia General Manager 277-7104/Renton Seattle Airport Hilton 17620 Pacific Highway South Tohn Basic Seattle. WA 98188 The Boeing Comuanv :-i4-..;.KOO PO. Box 3999, MS 9P-·'H Seattle, W A 98124 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose Of The Study ....................................... ... .. .. E-1 Study Area Characteristics ........................................ .. E-1 Technologies and Alternatives Considered E-5 Preferred Alternative ............................................ .. E-6 PRT System Component ... .. E-8 Evaluation Summary ........................................... .. E-15 Baseline Transportation Improvements ............................... .. E-18 GRT Shuttle Component ........................................ .. E-19 Financing the Improvements and Operation E-20 Implementation Strategy E-22 INTRODUCTION 1.0 BACKGROUND AND "MISSIONS" . 1-1 1.1 PROJECT MISSIONS . 1-1 1.2 STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS . 1-7 1.3 PEOPLE MOVER TRIP-MAKING POTENTIAL . 1-29 2.0 SEATAC PEOPLE MOVER TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT . 2-1 2.1 OVERVIEW . 2-1 2.2 BUS TECHNOLOGY . 2-9 2.3 PRT TECHNOLOGY . 2-13 2.4 GRT TECHNOLOGY . 2-23 2.5 SUMMARY . 2-27 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES . 3-1 3.1 BASE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS . 3-1 3.2 BUS ' '.' . 3-18 3.3 PRT . 3-22 3.4 GRT . 3-50 Table of Contents Continued Section 4.0 PATRONAGE ESTIMATES 4-1 4.1 FORECASTING APPROACH .. ......................... .. 4-1 4.2 REFINEMENT OF BASIC LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS 4-5 4.3 REFINEMENT OF PEOPLE MOVER TRIP FACTORS. ........ .. 4-6 4.4 SUMMARY OF BASIC ASSUMPTIONS 4-12 4.5 PATRONAGE FORECASTS 4-14 4.6 CONCLUSIONS 4-28 5.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION. .................................. .. 5-1 5.2 ASSUMPTIONS GUIDING THE ANALYSIS. ............... .. 5-2 5.3 LITERATURE REVIEW AND COMPARATIVE SURVEY. ...... .. 5-3 5.4 BASELINE ACCESS, AND TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING COSTS ............... .. ............. .. 5-7 5.5 ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS CRITERIA 5-12 5.6 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE PEOPLE MOVER SYSTEMS 5-13 . 5.7 BENEFIT ASSESSMENT 5-22 5.8 ECONOMIC BENEFITS AND COSTS TO MUNICIPAL PARTICIPANTS 5-24 5.9 CONCLUSIONS : 5-25 6.0 EVALUATION. ......................................... .. 6-1 6.1 CAPITAL COST '. .............. .. 6-1 6.2 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST ................. .. 6-11 6.3 RIDERSHIP. ...................................... .. 6-14 6.4 REVENUE SOURCES 6-16 6.5 GRT REMOTE PARKING SHUTTLE CONSIDERATIONS 6-18 6.6 HCT RAIL STATION TO AIRPORT TERMINAL CONNECTION 6-21 6.7 EVALUATION SUMMARY 6-22 6.8 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 6-25 7.0 FINANCING ANALYSIS 7-1 7.1 INTRODUCTION. .................................. .. 7-1 7.2 BACKGROUND. .. ................................. .. 7-1 7.3 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES. ...................... .. 7-2 7.4 CONCLUSION. ..................................... .. 18 11 Table of Contents Continued Section 8.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 8-1 8.1 NEXT STEPS IN THE PROGRAM. ...................... .. 8-1 8.2 PHASING OF PRT 8-9 8.3 GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PRT COMPONENT ,.... .. 8-11 8.4 TURNKEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 8-19 8.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR OTHER PEOPLE MOVER SYSTEM COMPONENTS - STAGE I 8-19 8.6 CONTINGENCY ACTIONS 8-21 APPENDIX A- Background Data Summary APPENDIX B - Supplemental GRT Analyses APPENDIX C - Supplemental Patronage/Ridership Tables APPENDIX D - Selected References to Articles on Economic Impacts of Rail Transit APPENDIX E - Interviews Conducted for Economic Analysis APPENDIX F - Project Staff III LIST OF FIGURES Figure Figure E-1 - Composite of Possible Study Area Trip Generators 3 Figure E-2 - Concept of Future SeaTac Internal Travel Patterns. ............... .. 4 Figure E-3 - Technologies and Alternatives 7 Figure E-4 - Potential Alternative for Comparative Evaluation . .. 10 Figure E-5 - Concepts of PRT Station Locations in Sea-Tac ................. .. 11 Figure E-6 - Implementation Schedule for Chicago RTA PRT System Demo. ..... .. 16 Figure E-7 - "Reduced" PRT System with GRT Shuttle .21 Figure E-8 - Overview of Major Work Tasks 24 Figure E-9 - Relationship of Governance Plan ........................... .. 29 Figure 1-1 - Project Study Area Limits 1-2 Figure 1-2 - Future SeaTac Internal Travel Patterns ...................... .. 1-5 Figure 1-3 - Proposed Metro Rail Alternative .... ...................... .. 1-8 Figure 1-4 - Proposed Metro Transitway Alternative 1-9 Figure 1-5 - Existing Metro Bus Routes .............................. .. 1-11 Figure 1-6 - Airport Parking ...................................... .. 1-12 Figure 1-7 - Rental Car Locations .................................. .. 1-16 Figure 1-8 - Hotel/Motel Locations 1-18 Figure 1-9 - Existing Land Use .................................... .. 1-12 Figure 1-10 - Proposed Development 1-23 Figure 1-11 - Existing Traffic ..................................... .. 1-24 Figure 1-12 - Potential Roadway ImprovementslProjected Traffic. ............ .. 1-26 Figure 1-13 - Major Employment Centers ............................. .. 1-27 Figure 1-14 - Environmentally Sensitive Sites .......................... .. 1-28 Figure 1-15 - SeaTac Development Patterns 1-30 Figure 1-16 - TransportationlDevelopment Interfaces 1-31 Figure 1-17 - Composite of Possible Study Area Trip Generators ............. .. 1-32 Figure 1-18 - People Mover Trip Generation Potential 1-33 Figure 2-1 - Technology Alternatives ................................ .. 2-8 Figure 2-2 - PRT Alternative Guideway Configuration .................... .. 2-15 Figure 2-3 -PRT Alternative Station Details 2-16 Figure 2-4 - PRT Alternative Guideway and Station Requirements ............ .. 2-17 Figure 2-5 - Implementation Schedule for Chicago RTA PRT System Demonstration . 2-24 IV Figures Continued Figure Figure 3-1 - Current Plan for Sea-Tac 3rd Floor Plaza . 3-3 Figure 3-2 - Shuttle Terminal Concepts . 3-4 Figure 3-3 - Shuttle Terminal Concepts . 3-5 Figure 3-4 - Suggested Diamond Lane Locations .......................... 3-7 Figure 3-5 - Possible Queue Bypass and Urban Design Treatments . 3-8 Figure 3-6 - Possible Queue Bypass Treatments . 3-9 Figure 3-6a - Left Turns from Right Lane Examples . 3-10 Figure 3-7 - Possible Queue Bypass and Urban Design Treatments . 3-12 Figure 3-8 - Possible Queue Bypass Treatments . 3-13 Figure 3-9 - International Boulevard Typical Section . 3-15 Figure 3-10 - International Boulevard Urban Design & HOV Treatment . 3-16 Figure 3-11 - International Boulevard Urban Design & HOV Treatment . 3-17 Figure 3-12 - Fixed Route Bus Alternative Definition . 3-19 Figure 3-13 - Aerial - PRT Conceptual Alignment Definition . 3-24 Figure 3-14 - PRT Urban Design Framework Linkage Forecourt . 3-25 Figure 3-15 - PRT Urban Design Framework Linkage Development . 3-26 Figure 3-16 - PRT Urban Design Framework Nodal Development . 3-28 Figure 3-17 - PRT Urban Design Framework Crossroads Development . 3-29 Figure 3-18 - PRT Guideway Concepts . 3-30 Figure 3-19 - PRT Guideway Trellis Concept Components . 3-31 Figure 3-20 - International Boulevard Typical Section After PRT . 3-32 Figure 3-21 - Typical View of PRT along International Boulevard . 3-33 Figure 3-22 - Typical PRT Station Interface with Red Lion Hotel . 3-35 Figure 3-23 - Alternative PRT Station Interface with Red Lion Hotel . 3-36 Figure 3-24 - PRT View at Red Lion Hotel . 3-37 Figure 3-25 - Option 1 PRT Station at Airport Terminal . 3-39 Figure 3-26 - Option 1 PRT View at Airport Terminal . 3-40 Figure 3-27 - Option 2 PRT Station at Airport Parking Structure . 3-41 Figure 3-28 - Option 2 PRT View at Airport Parking Structure . 3-42 Figure 3-29 - PRT/HCT Transfer Station Options . 3-44 Figure 3-30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bite Reminder & Transportation Tips 2017
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Megan Postiglione July 20, 2017 Festivals Inc. (425) 295-3262 [email protected] THIS WEEKEND: Catch a Ride to the Groupon Bite of Seattle® The Groupon Bite of Seattle®, July 21-23 at Seattle Center, is a summer favorite! The Bite celebrates its 36th Anniversary this year and features 60+ restaurants and vendors, local chefs performing live cooking demonstrations and mystery ingredient cook-offs on The Bite Cooks! stage, all-new Bite Cooks! Lounge where guests can wine & dine with local chefs, local Craft Beer and Cider Tasting, The Wine Bar, 4 live music stages, a free movie night on Friday, July 21st at 8:30pm featuring Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, and much more! With so much going on guests should plan for crowded streets as high attendance is anticipated for the 2017 festival. These transportation tips can help you save time, gas and some very sore feet! PLAN AHEAD The Groupon Bite of Seattle® is located at Seattle Center in the Uptown Neighborhood. Street address is 305 Harrison Street, Seattle, WA 98109. (See map for more details). Allow for time to park and maneuver through the crowds. Arriving early will ensure that you don’t miss out on any of the Bite events! There is possibility for continuation of ongoing Mercer Corridor road work affecting access to Seattle Center. Information on current road construction and alternate routes during construction may be found at www.seattlecenter.com. USE METRO SERVICE Bus service to Seattle Center is available via Metro routes 1 , 2, 3, 4, 8, 13, 29 & 32 and the RapidRide D Line.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT SYSTEMS and SERVICES in SEATTLE Author: Peter Lindsay Updated: May 20, 2015
    TRANSIT SYSTEMS AND SERVICES IN SEATTLE Author: Peter Lindsay Updated: May 20, 2015 INTRODUCTION On a typical weekday about 40 percent of commuters ride a bus or take a train to work in downtown Seattle. While the City of Seattle does not directly operate transit systems, the City does own transit assets. The City of Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan (page 3.9), states that “providing convenient and accessible transit service can help reduce reliance on single- occupant vehicles, slow the increase in environmental degradation associated with their use, and increase mobility without building new streets and highways.” On April 16, 2012, the City Council passed Resolution 31367, which adopted the Seattle Transit Master Plan (TMP). The TMP provides a 20-year look (through 2030) to the type of transit system that will be required to meet Seattle’s transit needs. It is an extensive update of the 2005 TMP, which identified key corridors linking urban villages and established performance standards for transit service. The 2012 TMP expanded that work and includes an evaluation of rail modes, rapid bus services, light rail station design, and capital infrastructure. The TMP addresses many critical issues, including: • Identification of the city’s most important transit corridors that carry high ridership today, as well as potential new ridership markets that will emerge as Seattle grows in jobs and new residents. • Selection of transit modes, such as bus rapid transit, light rail or streetcar that would work best on those corridors. • Integration of transit capital facilities and services with walking and biking infrastructure, as well as using transit to make great places.
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Center Monorail Braking System Upgrade
    Seattle Center Monorail Braking System Upgrade Seattle, Washington ORIGINALLY BUILT TO SHOWCASE AMERICAN INNOVATION FOR THE 1962 WORLD’S FAIR, THE SEATTLE CENTER MONORAIL IS THE OLDEST AND MOST FAMOUS OF ALL U.S. MONORAIL SYSTEMS. AFTER PERFORMING RELIABLY FOR MORE THAN 43 YEARS, THE AGING SYSTEM WAS IN NEED OF AN UPGRADE PROGRAM TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH TODAY’S PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. SCHWAGER DAVIS, INC. HAS BEEN PROVIDING ESSENTIAL SOLUTIONS EVER SINCE. The contract was performed on schedule, within budget and to the full satisfaction of the client. The Seattle Center Monorail in Washington State is the oldest operational monorail in the United States. Originally built to showcase American transportation innovation for the 1962 World’s Fair, the Alweg-designed system has since continued to operate as a downtown Seattle people mover and tourist attraction throughout five decades.. Although the monorail had undergone numerous upgrades and renovations over the years, in 2005 it was still operating in its original configuration as a driver-controlled, manually-operated system with few modern automated safety features. In early 2006, Schwager Davis, Inc. was contracted to review potential system safety hazards and to provide a solution to lower the g-forces of the existing emergency braking system. At the time, the emergency braking system stopped the trains too abruptly when applied, and was known to present a potential safety hazard. SDI provided a two-phase solution. Phase I involved analysis of the existing overly-abrupt emergency brakes and working with the owner’s control system integrator to provide a solution for the brakes along with measures to enable the semi-automated controls to provide a method of monitoring the operator’s speed and station approach performance.
    [Show full text]
  • RIDE the WAVE TRANSIT GUIDE Snohomish 33Rd St Station Terry Ave County Blanchard St
    Downtown Bellevue Downtown Everett Downtown Seattle Connect 2020 SEPT 2019 - Linking the connecting the Blue Line to the Eastside MARCH 2020 556 Vine St Everett Ave Denny Ave Wall St Wetmore Ave Wetmore California St Virginia Ave Virginia Bellevue Hewitt Ave Battery St Regional Library 567 Wall St City Hall Bell St Pacific Ave Everett RIDE THE WAVE TRANSIT GUIDE Snohomish 33rd St Station Terry Ave County Blanchard St Courthouse 9th Ave 8th Ave Connect 2020 7th Ave 6th Ave Route maps and schedules 5th Ave Western AveLenora St 4th Ave 3rd Ave AD 2nd Ave Stewart St Colby Ave 512 Link, Sounder and ST Express Virginia1st St Ave Howell St 567 Pike Place Light rail construction to reduce Olive Way 556 Broadway 112th Ave NE service for 10 weeks in 2020. 106th Ave NE E Pine St 7th Ave 7th Pike Place Ave 7th 8th Ave 9th Ave 6th Ave 6th PineAve 6th St Market eo Blv Learn more: ilt d Pike St E Pike St k SE Washington u State Convention soundtransit.org/connect2020 Downtown TacomaM & Trade Center Commerce St Union St bbell Pl E Union St Hu Tacoma Ave Market St 4th Ave Terry Ave Summit Ave Boylston Ave 9th Ave Ave 9th 9th Boren Ave Ave Boren Boren 8th Ave Ave 8th 8th Ave Minor University St Ave Minor Elliott Bay Seattle Art Powering progress Museum Thea Foss Waterway Pacific Ave S 9th St Seneca St 1st Ave 1st Western Ave Post Alley Ave 1st 2nd Ave 3rd Ave 5th Ave Spring St Ave 7th Sound Transit 1-888-889-6368 Connect with us Union Station TTY Relay: 711 facebook.com/SoundTransit S 11th St Madison St 401 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Juicing the “Seattle Squeeze” Lessons Learned from Seattle’S SR-99 Closure
    Juicing the “Seattle Squeeze” Lessons Learned from Seattle’s SR-99 Closure APTA Sustainability & Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop BenjaminDepartment Smith of Transportation July 29, 2019 Presentation overview • Seattle transit overview • The “Seattle Squeeze” • SR-99 Closure • Preparation for closure • Coordination during closure • Lessons learned Department of Transportation Seattle transit overview • King County Metro • Local and commuter bus • RapidRide BRT and electric trolleybus • Water taxi • Sound Transit • Link light rail • ST Express regional bus • Sounder commuter rail • City of Seattle • Seattle Center Monorail • Seattle Streetcar Department of Transportation The “Seattle Squeeze” • One of fastest growing cities in U.S. • ~250K employment in greater downtown (HQ1) • Transit ridership investment and growth • Infrastructure and development projects Department of Transportation The “Seattle Squeeze” - Timeline • • • • D2 Roadway • SR-99 Tunnel •• CenterAlaskan City Way open Convention Center Madison East Link, closes open Connectorto buses open RapidRide Lynnwood and • • Convention • Alaskan Way • mayConnect open 2020 Northgate Link G Line Federal Way (on hold) Center Viaduct (currentlyconstruction on hold) open open Link open • • construction demolition • Alaskan Way open North Portal Alaskan Way open begins • Alaskan Way to buses* streets open to traffic • construction Seattle Arena begins renovation • DSTT buses shift complete to surface • SR-520 “Rest of the West” project begins SR-99 Closure activities Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Fixed Guideway Public Transportation System Safety Report
    2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT JULY 2021 2020 Rail Fixed Guideway Public Transportation System Safety Report WSDOT STATE SAFETY OVERSIGHT PROGRAM 2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................1 Rail fixed guideway public transportation systems in Washington .......................................................3 Sound Transit ..................................................................................................................................................3 City of Seattle .................................................................................................................................................5 2020 State Safety Oversight Program updates .........................................................................................7 Accidents, incidents, and corrective action plans ......................................................................................7 Acronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................................................11 Websites featured ...........................................................................................................................................12 2020 RAIL FIXED GUIDEWAY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SAFETY REPORT WSDOT’s State Safety INTRODUCTION Oversight
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Accessibility Assessment and Research Project
    Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Accessibility Assessment and Research Project Open Doors Organization 2017 2 Acknowledgements Preparation of this research project was supported by funding from the Port of Seattle Commission to the Open Doors Organization (ODO). The ODO research team included the following members: Eric Lipp, Executive Director Laurel Van Horn, Director of Programs Katy O’Reilly, Program Coordinator Laura Gramer, ODO Consultant Open Doors Organization would like to acknowledge Keith Gillin, Architecture Manager, and Heather Karch, Facilities and Infrastructure Architect, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, for their guidance and support during this research project. Open Doors Organization would also like to acknowledge Cindi Laws, Seattle Commission for People with Disabilities, for challenging the Port of Seattle with becoming the “most accessible airport in the country.” Ms. Laws played a significant role in this project’s initiation and helped to ensure Seattle’s disability community was heard. This project would not have been possible without the support of the Port of Seattle Commission. Because of the Commission’s commitment to Sea-Tac travelers, access and inclusion have become a key priority for the airport community as a whole. Thank you to all of the community members, Port of Seattle employees, disability organizations, and airport vendors and stakeholders that took the time to share their feedback for this research project. 3 Table of Contents Section Title Page # Executive Summary 5 Report Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Communities: 6 Lessons
    PLACES + S PACES: A Tool f o r Educators planning communities: 6 Lessons Lesson Objective: Integrated Subjects: How do planners use mathematical tools to help them plan a community Math Social Studies that accounts for various needs? By surveying and analyzing the needs of the people who live in the community, planners can determine the Suggested Grade Levels: buildings and spaces that can create a vibrant place to live. 3rd-5th (See Lesson Adaptations section for use with upper Lesson Description: and lower grades) Students survey friends, family, and neighbors about their Lesson Duration: Up to needs in a community. Then students analyze the results of one hour per lesson the survey to determine the types of buildings and spaces necessary. Lesson Goals & Assessment Criteria: Target: Students connect function and design of buildings and/or spaces with emotions. Criteria: Students write emotions associated with building and space visited. Target: Students determine the needs that a building or space can serve. Criteria: Students classify and sort the types of Robert Purser buildings into “cultural universal” categories. MATERIALS: Target: Students survey others about their needs in a • paper neighborhood and use mathematical tools and strategies • pencils to analyze results. • recording device Criteria: Students ask survey questions, tally answers, and make (for interviews) conclusions based on responses to survey questions. • Sample Planning Communities Survey Target: Students graphically display results of survey and verbally questions (optional) articulate an analysis of the survey. • Planning Communities Survey Results Chart Criteria: Students create pie charts, bar graphs or other symbolic (optional) representations of data to communicate results of survey; • note cards present results orally.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Center
    Seattle Center Robert Nellams, Director (206) 684-7200 http://www.seattlecenter.com/ Department Overview Seattle Center is home to cultural and educational organizations, sports teams, festivals, community programs (including cultural and community celebrations), and entertainment facilities. Millions of people visit the 74-acre Seattle Center campus annually. Consistently rated as one of the City's top attractions, Seattle Center is a premier urban park whose purpose is to create exceptional events, experiences, and environments that delight and inspire the human spirit and build a stronger community. The history of Seattle Center dates back to a time well before it existed as a City department in its current form. Prior to the 1850s, the land on which Seattle Center sits was a part of a Native American trail which was later occupied by the David Denny family and eventually donated to the City of Seattle. In 1927, the new Civic Auditorium, now Marion Oliver McCaw Hall, and Arena, now the newly rebuilt Opera Center, were constructed with funding from a levy and a contribution from a local business owner. In 1939, a large military Armory was constructed. In 1948, the Memorial Stadium was built and the Memorial Wall was added in 1952. Finally, in 1962, the community pulled together these facilities and added new structures to host the Seattle World's Fair/Century 21 Exposition. At the conclusion of the fair, the City took ownership of most of the remaining facilities and campus grounds to create Seattle Center. Since its creation in 1963, Seattle Center has nurtured artistry and creativity by providing a home for and technical assistance to a wide variety of arts and cultural organizations.
    [Show full text]