10690 Highway 50 – Cole Farm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10690 Highway 50 – Cole Farm I 1-1 Staff Comment Foorm Date: January 9, 2015 To: Brampton Heritage Board Property: 10690 Highway 50 – Cole Farm Applicant: Orlando Corporation Inc. Subject: Cole Farmhouse, 10690 Hwy. 50 Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment This staff comment form has been prepared for AREA Architect’s Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the cultural heritage resource at 10690 Hwy 50. This HIA was carried out as part of an Official Plan and Zoning By-Law application for the ssubject lands to determine whether the heritage resource contains enough cultural heritage value to warrant retention and to outline mitigation measures that should be implemented. The attached HIA satisfies the City’s requirements for a Heritage Impact Assessment. HIA Details: Prepared By: ARREA (Architects Rasch Eckler Associates Ltd.) Final Submission: January 2015 I 1-2 Subject Site o 10690 Hwy 50 is an approximately 58 acre, triangular shaped property located along between Hwy 50 and Coleraine Drive, approximately 600 meters south of Countryside Drive. o It currently contains a farmhouse, barn complex, five other farm outbuildings, and agricultural fields. o The property is listed on the City of Brampton’s Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Resources. o The lands are currently subject to an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By­ law to permit industrial uses for a two-phased development of an industrial business park, which has been submitted by Glen Schnarr & Associates Inc. on behalf of Orlando Corp. and Prologis Inc. o 10690 Hwy 50 is located within the Highway 427 Industrial Secondary Plan (Area 47), which was adopted by Council in September 2014, but has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). o The property is designated Logistics/Warehouse/Transportation and Special Policy Area the Council approved Highway 427 Industrial Secondary Plan (Area 47). o A site-specific Official Plan amendment is required to facilitate the proposed business park in advance of a resolution of the OMB appeal. o The majority of the subject lands are zoned Agricultural, and an amendment to the Zoning By-law is required in order to permit the proposed industrial development. Report Highlights: o The property had a series of owners from the mid-nineteenth century to the early twentieth century, until it was eventually sold to Thomas Cole in 1853, which commenced a 70-year ownership of the property by the Cole family. o The brick house was likely constructed for Thomas Cole and his family, who was the most prominent member of the Cole family, being associated with the prosperous expansion of the farm during which he also served as township Councillor in 1863 and 1874. o It is believed that the Village of Coleraine directly south of this property derived its name from the combination of the two early settler families of this area - the Cole and the Raines. o The extant farmhouse is a 1½ storey brick structure built between 1861 to 1877, with an early rear addition that has been subject to numerous alterations/additions. o The main portion of house comprises a rectangular plan, which constitutes the original farmhouse, and exhibits both Gothic Revival and Italianate architectural influences. o The Cole Farmhouse, the primary heritage structure on the subject property, warrants conservation and designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. o The rear ‘ell’ addition appears to date from the later 19th century period, but its heritage integrity has been severely compromised by the various additions and alterations applied to it. 2 I 1-3 o The eastern section of the large barn complex appears to be a modified ‘Pennsylvania Dutch Barn’ with a number of later additions. o The current context of the property is rural in nature, being primarily surrounded by agricultural lands. o The context of the property will change significantly from agricultural to industrial as the area develops in accordance with the policies of the Highway 427 Industrial Secondary Plan. o The subject property is being planned to be developed as an industrial business park, which will incorporate large-footprint warehouse buildings and will change the current context. o In its current location, the farmhouse will be in close proximity to truck traffic, loading areas, and site functions that may negatively impact the conservation of its heritage attributes. o The industrial business park will create an incompatible environment for the farmhouse, which encourages the relocation of the house to a more compatible setting. o The transition to industrial uses and the challenges of adaptively reusing a large barn in such a context also necessitates the demolition of the original barn. o The Cole Farmhouse should be conserved through relocation, conservation and adaptive reuse. o Two sites for relocation of the farmhouse were considered in the HIA, including: o Relocation Site 1 (RS-1): On Coleraine Drive, adjacent to and north of three existing residential lots o Relocation Site 2 (RS-2): On the south-west corner of Coleraine Drive and Countryside Drive. o The final location of the farmhouse cannot be determined at this time until the completion of several key technical studies including, but not limited to, the Area 47 Master Environmental Servicing Plan (MESP) and the subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that will influence the limits of development and setback requirements for this area. o The final implementation strategies for the conservation of the Cole Farmhouse will be determined during the subsequent stages of planning and heritage approvals, and will be detailed in various required submissions including a Conservation Plan, Heritage Building Protection Plan, Heritage Permit, and Building Permit. Consultant’s Recommendations: AREA Architects Ltd. provides recommendations and potential mitigation strategies throughout the Heritage Impact Assessment. The primary recommendations are summarized below: o That the Cole Farmhouse be conserved through relocation, conservation, and adaptive reuse at Relocation Site 1. o That the City of Brampton designate the Cole Farmhouse and allow for its relocation to improve its integration within the proposed development. o That later alterations and additions that do not constitute the original rectangular block form of the farmhouse be selectively disassembled. 3 I 1-4 o That the heritage attributes of the masonry of the ell addition, particularly the distinct painted accents on the frieze, window surrounds and corners, be salvaged for reuse. o That all of the farm outbuildings be demolished. o That the property’s farm outbuildings be documented prior to their removal to contribute to the City’s archival records of the area’s early development. o That a commemorative landscape feature be implemented to reinforce the conservation of the Cole Farmhouse, and incorporate significant building components of the farm outbuildings, particularly the large original barn. o That the Conservation Plan for the Cole Farmhouse include components such as a Building Material Inventory, a Stabilization/Relocation Plan, and other detailed drawings and specifications that may be required. o That the receiving foundations of the farmhouse structure shall be built upon the immediate approval of the permanent relocation site to affix the structure on the ground, and to minimize risk of structural collapse. Staff Recommendations: Staff supports the conservation approach recommended by the consultant, and recommends that the following be incorporated as conditions of planning approval and/or the issuance of related permits: o That the Cole Farmhouse be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; o That the developer provide a Letter of Undertaking to the City confirming their agreement to permit the designation of the farmhouse under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; o That the demolition of the farm outbuildings be approved; o That the final site for the relocation of the Cole Farmhouse be determined following the completion of the key technical studies, such as the MESP and EIR, and be brought back to the Brampton Heritage Board for consideration; o That the farmhouse not be moved from its original location until such time that the receiving foundations at the new location are complete; o That upon removal from its original foundation, the farmhouse be immediately relocated and secured to the new foundation. o That the developer shall at their expense and to the satisfaction of the City Retain a demolition contractor experienced in dismantling historic buildings to salvage the identified materials in Appendix D of the Heritage Impact Assessment from the large original barn for eventual reuse in a landscape feature, as well as other materials that may salvaged and offered to a third party; Confirm the final destination of the salvaged materials with the City prior to the initiation of any salvage process; Store the salvaged materials at a location and in a manner that protects the materials from deterioration, until such time that the materials are reused; Retain a qualified heritage consultant to provide a Heritage Building Protection Plan, Conservation Plan; 4 I 1-5 Undertake all work in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Building Protection Plan, and associated permits; Post Financial Securities for the restoration of the farmhouse in an amount outlined in the Conservation Plan; Establish a landscape feature incorporating the salvaged materials from the large original barn within the new development; Provide a heritage
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Heritage Resource and Public Art Policies
    Cultural Heritage Resource and Public Art Policies Proposed Vaughan Official Plan Memorial Hall, Vellore Holy Trinity Church, Thornhill Scope of Work • Unterman McPhail Associates, together with Wayne Morgan Heritage Planner, was retained to: – Draft cutting edge cultural heritage resource and public art policies for the City’s draft official plan Policy Development Process • Review: – recent official plan policies in other municipalities – Provincial policies –Heritage Act & PPS – Vaughan heritage resource inventory – Existing Vaughan heritage policies and procedures • Input from: – Vaughan culture and recreation staff – the public through OP open houses Policy Highlights • Cultural Heritage Resources are important and will be part of the community’s future: – Vaughan has a wealth of heritage resources: Individual Residential Properties Agricultural development Capner House, 10072 Islington Ave. Dalziel Barn, 7060 Jane Street Selection of types of Heritage Resources in Vaughan: Heritage Conservation Districts Centre Street, Thornhill Cultural Heritage Landscapes Remnants of village of Patterson, Major Mackenzie Dr Selection of types of Heritage Resources in Vaughan: Monuments Cemeteries Memorial Hill, Woodbridge Maple Cemetery, Major Mackenzie Dr Selection of types of Heritage Resources in Vaughan: Commercial Properties Institutional Properties Dominion Exchange, Woodbridge Maple Train Station, Station Street, Maple Policy Highlights • Supports and Reinforces Council’s powers under the Ontario Heritage Act: – Listing properties in the
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE UPDATE.Pdf
    Item 8.12 Section I – Items for the Board of Directors Action TO: Chair and Members of the Board of Directors Meeting #6/20, Friday, September 25, 2020 FROM: Richard Ubbens, Director, Parks and Culture RE: BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE UPDATE ____________________________________________________________________________ KEY ISSUE To provide an update on the operations of Black Creek Pioneer Village (BCPV), as a standalone program of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA). RECOMMENDATION THAT TRCA staff be directed to work with Federal and Provincial governments and partner municipalities to establish an updated financial model for BCPV that will ensure the long-term viability of the heritage site, recognizing potential changes to the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act), while pursuing any immediate funding opportunities including grants from senior levels of government, and report back to TRCA’s Board of Directors in 2021; AND FURTHER THAT this report be forwarded to the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks Ontario, the Minister of Heritage, Sport, Tourism, and Culture Industries Ontario, the Minister of Infrastructure Ontario, the Minister of Heritage Canada, the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities Canada, and the Federal and Provincial Members of Parliament in TRCA’s jurisdiction. BACKGROUND Shortly after the formation of the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, BCPV was created in 1960, to share the story of the Toronto region in the 1800s, showcase the region’s material culture, and preserve greenspace in the region’s urbanizing area. Over the last 60 years, millions of people have explored the history of the Toronto region at BCPV, which has developed into the region’s largest living history museum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humber River: the 10-Year Monitoring Report for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System October 2009 Lower Humber Valley, Toronto, TRCA, 2008
    THE HUMBER RIVER: THE 10-YEAR MONITORING REPORT FOR THE CANADIAN HERITAGE RIVERS SYSTEM October 2009 Lower Humber Valley, Toronto, TRCA, 2008 THE HUMBER CHALLENGE Our challenge is to protect and enhance the Humber River watershed as a vital and healthy ecosystem where we live, work and play in harmony with the natural environment. GUIDING PRINCIPLES To achieve a healthy watershed, we should: • Increase awareness of the watershed’s resources • Protect the Humber River as a continuing source of clean water • Celebrate, regenerate, and preserve our natural, historical and cultural heritage • Increase community stewardship and take individual responsibility for the health of the Humber River • Establish linkages and promote partnerships among communities • Build a strong watershed economy based on ecological health, and • Promote the watershed as a destination of choice for recreation and tourism The Humber River: The 10-Year Monitoring Report for the Canadian Heritage Rivers System i FRAGMENT: THE VALLEY Like a sweet wine flowing from the glass, the Humber of my boyhood years! First the stretch of the river valley as I knew it best, running south from Dundas Street to my beloved stone marvel of the Old Mill Bridge, a scant mile to the south, not forgetting to count a quarter-mile jog to the east halfway down to heighten the wonderment. What force of ten million years’ cunning erosion, the relentless path of an awkward giant carving out for himself great steps one by one as he strides on and on, thirsty now for a great cold draught of Lake Ontario water! What sheer-climbing cliffs with the history of planet Earth carved in each layer of shale reaching up a hundred feet from the shining valley floor, the littered rocks of the river ….
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5 Black Creek Pioneer Village North, Master Plan, Updated June 2013
    Appendix 5 Black Creek Pioneer Village North, Master Plan, Updated June 2013 80 | GHD | Report for City of Vaughan - Municipal Servicing Master Plan Class Environmental Assessment Study, 2820529/[09321]/ Black Creek Pioneer Village North Lands Master Plan MASTER PLAN DESIGN BRIEF Prepared by: Schollen & Company Inc. George Robb Architect TCI Management Consultants The Municipal Infrastructure Group Unterman McPhail Associates Updated June 2013 by TRCA Black Creek Pioneer Village North Lands Master Plan Master Plan Design Brief March 2013 Black Creek Pioneer Village North Lands Master Plan MASTER PLAN DESIGN BRIEF March 2013 Table of Contents Schmidt Dalziel Barn 1809 1.0 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Site Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Existing Conditions – Schmidt–John Dalziel Barn ........................................................................................... 8 1.3 Existing Conditions – Schmidt-John Dalziel House ......................................................................................... 9 1.4 Existing Conditions – James Dalziel House ................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Existing Conditions – Sawyer’s House .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting #1/12
    Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/12 Chair: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair: Members: Maria Augimeri David Barrow Bob Callahan Dave Ryan April 13, 2012 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING - APPROX. 10:30 A.M. WESTON ROOM B, BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE AGENDA Pages BAAB1. MINUTES OF MEETING #2/11, HELD ON OCTOBER 14, 2011 (Minutes Enclosed herewith on YELLOW) BAAB2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES BAAB3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF BAAB4. DELEGATIONS BAAB5. PRESENTATIONS BAAB5.1 A presentation by Jim Dillane, Director, Finance and Business Development, in regard to item BAAB7.1 - 2012 Budget, Operating and Capital. BAAB6. CORRESPONDENCE BAAB7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION BAAB7.1 2012 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL 3 BAAB8. SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD BAAB8.1 2011 YEAR END FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT 82 1 BAAB8.2 2011 AUDIT PLANNING Initial Communication From Grant Thornton, LLP 85 BAAB9. NEW BUSINESS NEXT MEETING OF THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD TO BE HELD ON JUNE 22, 2012 Brian Denney Chief Administrative Officer /ks 2 Item BAAB7.1 TO: Chair and Members of the Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/12, April 13, 2012 FROM: James W. Dillane, Director, Finance and Business Services RE: 2012 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL ______________________________________________________________________________ KEY ISSUE Recommends approval of the 2012 operating and capital budget. RECOMMENDATION THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT WHEREAS the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Detailed Existing Conditions in Corridor
    6. DETAILED EXISTING CONDITIONS IN Bus Routes include #24D/224D, #25D, #35D, #60, #68B, #102D, #105, GO Markham Terminal – Located at Main Street north (Highway 48) and #107CF/BCF, #129A, #160, and #165D. Their peak period headways are Station Street in Markham, on the Stouffville and Highway 407 Lines. CORRIDOR between 11 to 45 minutes. Primary access to the terminal is via Station Street. GO Trains operate on headways of between 30 and 70 minutes during the weekday AM Chapter 6 summarizes the existing conditions in the selected transit 6.1.1.3 Existing GO Transit Bus Routes in the Corridor and PM peak periods. GO buses service the terminal throughout the corridor, namely the Highway 7 Corridor. These existing conditions day with approximately 60-minute headways. include: GO Transit operates numbers of express buses in the Highway 7 and Vaughan North-South Link Corridor. The 407-York U Service runs along The major transit terminals or centres where transit is prevalent are ¾ Transportation Environment; Highway 407 between Highway 50 and Ninth Line including services generally located at the Malls. A new terminal opened in Oct/Nov 2004 on ¾ Natural Environment; to/from York University. Stouffville Service runs along Highway 404 Jane Street south of Rutherford Road, providing service to the Vaughan ¾ Social Environment; between Toronto and Stouffville. Newmarket “B” Service runs along Yonge Mills area. Additional terminals and centres are located within the Highway ¾ Cultural Heritage Resources; Street between Finch Station and Barrie. Bolton Service, a rush-hour 7 Corridor and along the proposed links include: ¾ Existing Noise and Vibration Levels; and service, operates on Highway 27 between Bolton and York Mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Budgetaudit Advisory Board 2016.Pdf[Icon]
    Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/16 was held at TRCA Head Office, on Friday, April 1, 2016. The Chief Executive Officer Brian Denney, called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. PRESENT Colleen Jordan Member Gino Rosati Member John Sprovieri Member ABSENT Maria Augimeri Chair RES.#C1/16 - ELECTION OF CHAIR Moved by: Gino Rosati Seconded by: John Sproveri THAT Colleen Jordan be elected Chair to conduct Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/16, held on April 1, 2016. CARRIED ______________________________ RES.#C2/16 - MINUTES Moved by: Gino Rosati Seconded by: John Sprovieri THAT the Minutes of Meetings #2/15, held on June 26, 2015 and #3/15, held on October 16, 2015, be received. CARRIED ______________________________ (a) A presentation by Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, TRCA, in regard to item 8.1 - 2016 Budget, Operating and Capital. RES.#C3/15 - PRESENTATIONS Moved by: Gino Rosati Seconded by: John Sprovieri THAT above-noted presentation (a) be received. CARRIED ______________________________ 1 Section I – Items for Authority Action RES.#C4/16 - 2016 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL Recommends approval of the 2016 operating and capital budget. Moved by: Gino Rosati Seconded by: John Sprovieri THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT WHEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that a conservation authority, in establishing its annual levy, shall have the power to determine the proportion of the total benefit afforded to all the participating municipalities that is afforded to each of them; THEREFORE LET IT
    [Show full text]
  • Individually Designated Properties
    Individually Designated Properties (Alphabetical by street name) Buildings or structures designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. These are buildings that are individually designated due to their significant cultural and heritage significance. Each property has its own City of Vaughan By-law with specific information noting the reason for designation. This information is maintained by the Clerk’s department. Some properties have several by-laws as they are also part of a Heritage Conservation District. Please Note: Every effort has been made to ensure the information contained in this document is correct and timely, however, errors can be made and we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Finally, this listing may be updated or changed as required by staff and therefore, information should be verified by Cultural Heritage staff. CO NO. ADDRESS LOT NAME COMMUNITY PART IV BY-LAW & ROLE # CIRCA N Maple 341-87 9/21/87 1 51 Belmont Crescent 16 3 Peter Rupert House Yes c.1861 (Sherwood) 201000210811980000 2 1 Brooke Street 0 0 The Gallanough Library Thornhill Yes 307-88 11-85 1/14/85 3 140 Brooke Street 30 1 Holy Trinity Anglican Church Thornhill Yes c.1841 201000041170000000 21-83; 307-88 2/14/83 4 121 Centre Street 30 1 J.E.H / Thoreau MacDonald House Thornhill Yes c.1914 20100004142000000 186-85 5/28/85 5 220 Charlton Avenue 2 2 John Charlton House Thornhill Yes c.1860 201000191721700000 31-85 1/28/85 6 117 Clarence Street 8 7 John Abell House Woodbridge Yes c.1859 2030004229111000000 17 & 39-86 1/20/86 7 9605 Dufferin
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    ​ Authority Meeting Agenda #8/15 September 25, 2015 9:30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Pages 1. MINUTES OF MEETING #7/15, HELD ON JULY 24, 2015 http://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/210654.pdf 2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. DELEGATIONS 5. PRESENTATIONS 5.1 A presentation by Chris Bagley, General Manager, Black Creek Pioneer Village, TRCA, in regard to item 7.1 - Black Creek Pioneer Village. 5.2 A presentation by Brian Denney, CEO, TRCA, in regard to item 7.11 - Review of the Conservation Authorities Act. 5.3 A video presentation of the Girls Can Too Program at Bolton Camp. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/life-video/video-girls-can-too- construction/article26126709/#video0id26126709 6. CORRESPONDENCE 6.1 An email dated September 12, 2015 Dana and Jiri Kopka, 201 Greyabbey Raod, 7 Toronto at in regard to item 8.1 - 220 Greyabbey Trail. 7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION 7.1 BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE 9 North Lands Master Plan and the Vision 1 7.2 GREENWOOD CONSERVATION LANDS 19 Greenwood Conservation Lands Master Plan and Brock North inland filling 7.3 TRCA CROSSING GUIDELINES FOR VALLEY AND STREAM CORRIDORS 25 7.4 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR 2016-2020 45 7.5 HEART LAKE CONSERVATION AREA WORKSHOP 48 Feed-in-Tariff (FIT 3.0) Project 7.6 SCARBOROUGH WATERFRONT PROJECT THRID PARTY FACILITATOR 51 SERVICES 7.7 TOWN OF AJAX STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND CLEAN-OUT 54 PARTNERSHIP 7.8 ANNIE CRESCENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND (SWMP) CLEAN 57 OUT AND RETROFIT PROJECT Contract #10000904 - Disposal of Stockpiled Sediment Dredgeate 7.9 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 60 Professional Access and Integration Enhancement Program 7.10 SUPPLY AND DELIVERY OF CLOTHING 2015-2017 70 Award of Contract #10000813 7.11 REVIEW OF THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT Report to Follow 8.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Vaughan Recreation Services Fonds 1900-2018
    RG 18 CITY OF VAUGHAN RECREATION SERVICES FONDS 1900-2018 City of Vaughan Archives 2141 Major Mackenzie Drive Vaughan, Ontario 2013; Latest Revision 2020 Table of Contents Introduction to the City of Vaughan Archives’ Finding Aid........................................................................... 5 Part 1: Fonds Level Description..................................................................................................................... 6 City of Vaughan Recreation Services Fonds (RG 18) ................................................................................. 6 Part 2: Series Level Description ..................................................................................................................... 7 Reference Books and Enlargement (RG 18 (M012.1)/I) ........................................................................... 7 Historic Properties (RG 18 (M013.1)/IIa) .................................................................................................. 8 Streetscapes (RG 18 (M013.1)/IIb) ........................................................................................................... 8 Events/Admin (RG 18 (M013.1)/IIc) .......................................................................................................... 9 Card Catalogue (RG 18 (M013.1)/IId) ....................................................................................................... 9 Heritage Photos (RG 18 (M013.2)/III) ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Existing and Future Conditions
    Spadina Subway Extension – Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment Existing and Future Conditions Spadina Subway Extension – Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment Spadina Subway Extension – Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Existing and Future Conditions Environmental Assessment # @vvthqA r8qvv Yonge and Spadina Subway Lines across Steeles Avenue in a “loop” was not part of the approval sought in 1994. No further action was taken on the planned extension of the Spadina Subway from Downsview Station to The purpose of this section of this EA is to identify existing conditions within the Study Area, including the York University due to changing economic circumstances including the withdrawal of provincial funding for existing transportation planning context, transportation systems, natural environment, socio-economic transit capital programs and changing priorities. environment, existing and planned land use, and future transportation demands. This information served as a baseline for the generation of alternatives, the prediction of condition changes/environmental effects In the past twelve years, urban policy and growth patterns have supported a re-evaluation of the EA and the identification of environmental protection measures. Several separate technical reports were approved alignment. The subway is now being proposed to extend from Downsview Station to Steeles prepared which describe the existing conditions in greater detail. Copies of these reports are provided in Avenue. In the following section, the Planning Context describes the provincial, regional and city the Appendices of this EA. transportation and land use plans and policies that affect the Study Area. # Tq6 rh The Study Area, first proposed in the Terms of Reference then confirmed through existing conditions work, is bounded by Highway 7 and Steeles Avenue to the north, Keele Street, Dufferin Street and Wilmington Avenue to the east, Sheppard Avenue to the south, and Black Creek and Edgeley Boulevard to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting #1/13
    Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/13 Chair: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Vice Chair: Members: Maria Augimeri David Barrow Bob Callahan Dave Ryan April 12, 2013 8:30 A.M. WESTON ROOM B, BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE AGENDA Pages BAAB1. MINUTES OF MEETING #3/12, HELD ON OCTOBER 12, 2012 (Minutes Summary Enclosed Herewith on YELLOW) BAAB2. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES BAAB3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF BAAB4. DELEGATIONS BAAB5. PRESENTATIONS BAAB5.1 A presentation by Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer, TRCA, in regard to item BAAB7.1 - 2013 Budget, Operating and Capital. BAAB6. CORRESPONDENCE BAAB7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION BAAB7.1 2013 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL 3 1 BAAB8. SECTION IV - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD BAAB8.1 2012 YEAR END FINANCIAL PROGRESS REPORT 80 NEW BUSINESS NEXT MEETING OF THE BUDGET/AUDIT ADVISORY BOARD TO BE HELD ON JUNE 21, 2013, AT 8:30 A.M. IN WESTON ROOM B, BLACK CREEK PIONEER VILLAGE Brian Denney Chief Administrative Officer /ks 2 Item BAAB7.1 TO: Chair and Members of the Budget/Audit Advisory Board Meeting #1/13, April 12, 2013 FROM: Rocco Sgambelluri, Chief Financial Officer RE: 2013 BUDGET, OPERATING AND CAPITAL _____________________________________________________________________________ KEY ISSUE Recommends approval of the 2013 operating and capital budget. RECOMMENDATION THE BOARD RECOMMENDS TO THE AUTHORITY THAT WHEREAS the Conservation Authorities Act (CA Act) provides that a conservation authority, in establishing its annual levy, shall
    [Show full text]