DOCSLIB.ORG

Lighting the Way Home

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lighting the Way Home Grand Forks 10 Year Plan to End Long Term Homelessness CITY OF GRAND FORKS 2008 Thank you to the people who participated in the development of the Grand Forks 10 Year Plan to End Long Term Homelessness for a truly collaborative effort. Kathryn Allery Development Homes, Inc. Bridgie Hansen Grand Forks County Juvenile Detention Kent Anderson Grand Forks Homes, Inc. Devon Hansen UND Geography Department Gerri Anderson Northeast Human Service Center Terry Hanson Grand Forks Housing Authority Lindy Beauchamp Salvation Army Greg Hoover Office of Urban Development Joyce Belbas Adult Learning Center Susan Houser Job Service ND Keith Berger Grand Forks County Social Services John Johnson Options Interstate Resource Center for Independent Living Lynda Berger Grand Forks Housing Authority Deborah Johnson Prairie Harvest Human Services Patricia Berger United Way Grand Forks/East Grand Forks Terri Keehr Grand Forks Public Health Department Amy Brooks Lutheran Social Services Faye Kihne Community Violence Intervention Center Andrea Brudvig Community Violence Intervention Center Craig Knudsvig Grand Forks Housing Authority Client Services Program Sheila Bruhn Community Foundation of Grand Geneva LaVallie Red River Valley Community Action Forks/East Grand Forks JoAnn Brundin St. Vincent de Paul & CUP Amanda Lupien Community Violence Intervention Center Tammy Byzewski Northeast Human Service Center Lora Machart Red River Valley Community Action Ed Christ Grand Forks County Social Services Mary Magnusson North Dakota Council on Homeless People John Colter Grand Forks Apartment Association Mary McConnell Prairie Harvest Human Services Danielle Conrad Red River Valley Community Action Dawnita Nilles Grand Forks County Social Services Michael Danielski VA - Fargo (Health Care for Homeless Katie Osborn Office of Urban Development Intern Veterans) Barb Durgin Development Homes Sgt. John Ramberg Grand Forks County Mike Fuqua Salvation Army Janell Regimbal Lutheran Social Services Brad Gengler City Planning Department Karen Schelinder Red River Valley Community Action Chad Gerloff Altru Health System Dave Sena Northlands Rescue Mission Keith Gilleshammer Centre Inc. Sue Shirek Third Street Clinic & GF Police Dept. Eliot Glassheim Grand Forks City Council Leslie Stastny ND Association for the Disabled (NDAD) Judd Graham Grand Forks Housing Authority Board of Tami Staven Options Interstate Resource Center for Directors Independent Living Charlotte Gregerson Mountainbrooke Debbie Swanson Grand Forks Public Health Department Thomas Gusewelle Veterans Administration - Fargo Jody Thompson Grand Forks Public Schools Rachel Hafner Prairie Harvest Human Services Capt. Linda Wagner Grand Forks County Jail Pete Haga City of Grand Forks, Community/Gov. SuAnne Wood Frasier Community Foundation of Grand Relations Office Forks/East Grand Forks Jamie Hager Metroplains Development of the 10-Year Plan facilitated by: Office of Urban Development - Meredith Richards – Community Development Manager, Peggy Kurtz – Community Development Specialist, and Todd Fahrni – Intern. Jessica Thomasson, Planning Consultant. Table of Contents WHY END LONG TERM HOMELESSNESS? ................................................................................... 1 HOMELESSNESS IN GRAND FORKS ............................................................................................ 3 LONG TERM HOMELESS .................................................................................................... 4 REASONS FOR HOMELESSNESS ............................................................................................. 5 THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................... 6 EMERGENCY SHELTER SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 6 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY ................................................................................................. 7 SUPPORT SERVICES .......................................................................................................... 8 DEFINING THE GOAL .......................................................................................................... 10 LOCAL STRATEGIES TO END LONG TERM HOMELESSNESS .............................................................. 11 STRATEGY #1. OUTREACH ............................................................................................... 11 STRATEGY #2. TREATMENT SERVICES .................................................................................. 14 STRATEGY #3. ACCESS TO SERVICES .................................................................................... 16 STRATEGY #4. PERMANENT HOUSING ................................................................................. 19 STRATEGY #5. ABILITY TO PAY RENT ................................................................................... 21 STRATEGY #6. PREVENTION ............................................................................................. 24 STRATEGY #7. PLANNING ................................................................................................ 26 IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................................................................... 28 CURRENT ACTIONS ..................................................................................................... 28 TIMELINE ................................................................................................................. 28 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 30 REFERENCE LIST ................................................................................................................ 31 APPENDIX A: ABOUT THE 10-YEAR PLANNING MOVEMENT ........................................................... 33 APPENDIX B: LOCAL PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................. 34 APPENDIX C: HOMELESSNESS IN ND BY REGION ......................................................................... 35 APPENDIX D: SUPPORT SERVICE MATRIX .................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX E: FUNDING PLAN: A SNAPSHOT AT TIME OF PLAN ADOPTION ........................................... 39 . p lace to slee p Lighting the Way Home Grand Forks 10 Year Plan to End Long Term Homelessness do not have a safe , It’s easy to stereotype homelessness. But doing so produces an inaccurate and overly simplistic picture of a very complex, very personal issue. Homelessness occurs when an individual… a household… a family, is in housing crisis. It is brought about in a variety of ways - sometimes suddenly, as in cases of domestic violence, and sometimes over a period of years, as so often happens when disability and poverty combine to create a fragile existence. In Grand Forks, this number is 124, including 27 is 124, including In Grand Forks, this number ◊ for whatever reason , Long term homelessness, which is the focus of this particular document, occurs when a person has a disabling condition and has been homeless for a very long time (continuously homeless for at least one year, or been homeless four or more times in a three-year period). It is often the most visible form of homelessness in the community – visible because people are often literally living under bridges or on the streets. According to the 2007 Statewide Point-in-Time survey, 21% of the Grand Forks homeless population can be classified as “long term homeless” (26 of 124 people). Almost two-thirds of this group has been diagnosed with a mental illness and/or has a history of chemical dependency. Approximately 90% are individuals and have been homeless an average of 3 years. These are 27 children who 27 children These are ◊ For this very specific group of people that faces a multitude of housing and personal challenges, the current homeless service system does not work. The community must either adopt a new approach to serving this group of individuals or simply accept long term homelessness as a reality for some of the most vulnerable among us. meless. This includes 212 homeless children. includes 212 homeless children. meless. This Plan. Ending long term homelessness is achievable in Grand Forks if the community chooses to act deliberately to do so. The impact on human life, the moral imperative, the economics of cost avoidance for the community, and the relief to overburdened systems combine to make the choice an easy one. Forks whose lives are in crisis. Forks The plan employs two principal “approaches” to ending homelessness, the combination of which has been born out in academic literature and field-based experience as being a best practice for ending long term homelessness. PREVENTION: “Close the Front Door” Reduce the number of people who become chronically homeless INTERVENTION: “Open the Back Door” Increase placement into supported housing of people who are currently experiencing homelessness On any given night in North Dakota, 869 people are ho On any given night in North children - these are citizens of Grand children - these Framework. The tools necessary to implement these approaches are affordable permanent supportive housing, creative and persistent outreach, a compendium of responsive support services, a collaborative approach to prevention and follow-up, and the commitment to attack this issue in a very deliberate manner. These
Recommended publications
  • Consumer's Resource Handbook. INSTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C

    Consumer's Resource Handbook. INSTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C

    DOCUMENT RESUME _ED' 299 376 CE 049 396 TITLE, Consumer's Resource Handbook. INSTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 100p. PUB TYPE Guides - Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adults; *Consumer Education; *Consumer Protection; Merchandise Information; *Money Management; *Organizations (Groups); *Resources IDENTIFIERS *Consumer Complaints ABSTRACT This-handbook is intended to help consumers exercise their rights in the marketplace in three ways. It shows how to communicate more effectively with manufacturers, retailers, and service providers; it is a self-help manual for resolving individual consumer complaints; and it lists helpful sources of assistance. The handbook has two sections. Part I, How To Be a-Smart Consumer, features tips on avoiding purchasing problems and getting the most for-one's money. It gives steps-for handling one's own complaint and writing an effective complaint letter. Part II, the Consumer Assistance Directory, lists consumer offices-in both the public and private sectors that provide assistance for consumer complaints. An indek-in the back of the -handbook lists, by subject, the appropriate contact. Consumer tips and remainders on resolving complaints appear throughout the handbook- These tips are also in the indek by subject. The handbook is a handy reference tool for.consumers; additional users include educators (as a source of information and ideas for developing and teaching innovative consumer education courses) and consumer leaders in business and government (as a resource for locating others who share consumer program objectives and who can help resolve consumer complaints). (YLB) *************************************************************t********* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
  • ED 290 685 Pub DATE AVAILABLE from PUB TYPE EDRS PRICE DOCUMENT RESUME Consumer's Resource Handbook. 1988 Edition. Office Of

    ED 290 685 Pub DATE AVAILABLE from PUB TYPE EDRS PRICE DOCUMENT RESUME Consumer's Resource Handbook. 1988 Edition. Office Of

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 290 685 SO 018 804 TITLE Consumer's Resource Handbook. 1988 Edition. PISTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C. PuB DATE 88 NOTE 100p. AVAILABLE FROMConsumer Information Center, Pueblo, CO 81009. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Consumer Economics; *Consumer Education; Consumer Protection; Daily Living Skills; Home Economics; Information Sources; Money Management; Purchasing; *Social Studies IDENTIFIERS Consumers ABSTRACT This handbook is intended to help consumers exercihe their rights in the marketplace in three ways: (1) it shows how to communicate more effectively with manufacturers, retailers, end arvice providers; (2) it is a self-help manual for resolvins in dividual consumer complaints; and (3) it lists helpful sources of assistance. The handbook has two sections. Part I, How to Be a Smart Consumer, features tips on avoiding purchasing problems and getting the most for one's money. It gives steps for handling one's own complaint and writing an effective complaint letter. Part II, the Consumer Assistance Directory, lists consumer offices in both the public and private sectors that provide assistance for consumer complaints. An index in the back of the handbook lists, by subject, the appropriate contact Consumer tips aad reminders on resolving complaints appear throughout the handbook. These tips are also in the index by subject. (YLB) ********************c************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original locument. **************************************1 x************f **************** Consumer's s c Ta Vr 111116111. Or .. t = '.141111 IPIPPMW.7. ":""""" / // / .,! ///' - /1'// ;";/&;/,' /2,/ A 15 ,::.///ZZ,/// ye. - 004e71('-1411ir/4! %,0 /7/ N.:40 ' 141 t %'/ :[E/ r*t .
  • Guide to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey

    Guide to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey

    Guide to the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey Data Release No. 21 Stephen Ansolabehere, PI Harvard University Brian Schaffner, co-PI University of Massachusetts Amherst Sam Luks, co-PI YouGov August 2017 The 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study was supported by the National Science Foundation Award # 1559125. 1Data Release 1 occurred on March 2017, and corresponds to the 2016 CCES Common Content. Data Release 2 occurred on August 4, 2017 and corresponds to the 2016 CCES Common Content with vote validation appended. 1 Contents Acknowledgments 4 Referencing the Study 6 Part I 7 Introduction 7 State Sample Sizes 9 Table of AAPOR Response Rates 11 Part II 12 Sampling Methodology 12 Sampling and Sample Matching . 12 Theoretical Background for Sample Matching . 13 Sampling Frame and Target Sample . 14 Stratification and Matching . 15 Weighting . 16 Using Weights . 16 Accuracy of the CCES Sample . 16 Part III 23 Common Content 23 Sample Identifiers . 23 Profile . 26 Pre-election . 56 Post-election . 98 Vote Validation . 126 Part IV 129 Contextual Variables 129 Pre-Election Survey Contextual Variables . 129 Post-Election Survey Contextual Variables . 134 Senate . 138 Governors . 141 2 House . 145 Part V 163 Cross-reference 163 3 Acknowledgments This project is the collaborative effort of 60 research teams and organizations. Individual teams had their own principal investigators and research groups and designed their own team surveys. The teams and their Principal Investigators are: Table 1: Teams and Principal Investigators
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS May 15, 1986 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS DON REGAN: an ELOQUENT Whose Patriotism I Esteem

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS May 15, 1986 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS DON REGAN: an ELOQUENT Whose Patriotism I Esteem

    11080 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS May 15, 1986 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS DON REGAN: AN ELOQUENT whose patriotism I esteem. I appreciate allies, and our former enemies, in rebuilding SPOKESMAN FOR THE REAGAN your efforts, Bill, and those of your vice their shattered lands. And I would submit REVOLUTION chairmen, in arranging this dinner. Eliza­ that this economic creativity was but one beth Dole-well, I don't suppose Liddy Dole aspect of a wider creativity that permeated needs any introduction in this town. Suffice the culture as the rest of the world turned HON. JACK F. KEMP it to say that she serves President Reagan to America as its leader. Although in the OF NEW YORK with savvy, with style, and with a quality sixties and seventies it became fashionable IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that's often rare in government-a sense of to portray the decade of the fifties as dull humor. She also has a persistent quality or square-a period culturally inert-in fact Thursday, May 15, 1986 that won't take "no" for an answer-! it was anything but that. Mr. KEMP. Mr. Speaker, I recently had the know-! have to deal with her regularly and "Not since the 1920's," Professor Jeffrey privilege to be in the audience to hear White she's remaking me into a "yes" man. Hart of Dartmouth writes in his book on House Chief of Staff Donald Regan's remarks There are so many others, so many good the fifties, "had so much been happening, to the Center for the Study of the Presidency friends.
  • Speaking Up: Down-Ballot Candidate Communication, Clinton, Trump, and the Election That Surprised America

    Speaking Up: Down-Ballot Candidate Communication, Clinton, Trump, and the Election That Surprised America

    Speaking Up: Down-Ballot Candidate Communication, Clinton, Trump, and the Election that Surprised America Kiana M. Scott A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: David Domke, Chair Mark Smith J. Patrick Dobel Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Communication © Copyright 2017 Kiana M. Scott University of Washington Abstract Speaking Up: Down-Ballot Candidate Communication, Clinton, Trump, and the Election that Surprised America Kiana M. Scott Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor David Domke Department of Communication This dissertation examined legislative candidates’ public communications about Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the 2016 presidential election, via three forms of analysis. Specifically, I employed content analysis to examine patterns of state and federal legislative candidate communication on Twitter, with attention to the level of office sought, incumbency status, partisan identity, and candidate gender. I analyzed tweets referencing the presidential nominees from 98 candidates running for legislative office during the election. Second, I conducted semi-structured interviews with candidates for the Washington State Legislature, to examine how candidates constructed discourse about the presidential nominees. Third, I analyzed Republican U.S. senators’ public communication responses to the release of a video showing Trump bragging about sexually assaulting women, a discursive moment that essentially forced lawmakers to react publicly. Together, these analyses indicate important differences in how down-ballot candidates communicate about the nominees at the top of the ticket, and complicate the role of these political actors and communicators. Findings of this work have several important implications for our understanding of legislative candidate communication, and offer insight into an understudied area of American political communication.
  • Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1999

    Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1999

    S. HRG. 105±817 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON H.R. 4193/S. 2237 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF THE IN- TERIOR AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Agriculture Department of the Interior General Accounting Office National Endowment for the Arts National Endowment for the Humanities Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 46±102 cc WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0±16±057987±2 1 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington DALE BUMPERS, Arkansas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey CONRAD BURNS, Montana TOM HARKIN, Iowa RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HARRY REID, Nevada ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah HERB KOHL, Wisconsin BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado PATTY MURRAY, Washington LARRY CRAIG, Idaho BYRON DORGAN, North Dakota LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina BARBARA BOXER, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H.
  • Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: a Tradition of Activism

    Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: a Tradition of Activism

    UCSF Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States Title Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: A Tradition of Activism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9v58x8ps Authors Welle, Jennifer R, MPH Ibrahim, Jennifer K., Ph.D. Glantz, Stanton A., Ph.D. Publication Date 2004-06-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: A Tradition of Activism Jennifer R. Welle MPH Jennifer K. Ibrahim Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education Institute for Health Policy Studies School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA 94118 June 2004 Tobacco Control Policy Making in North Dakota: A Tradition of Activism Jennifer R. Welle MPH Jennifer K. Ibrahim Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education Institute for Health Policy Studies School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA 94118 June 2004 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grant CA-61021. Copyright 2004 by J.R. Welle, J.K. Ibrahim and S.A. Glantz. Permission is granted to reproduce this report for nonprofit purposes designed to promote the public health, so long as this report is credited. This report is available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tpmus/ND2004 .This report is one of a series of reports that analyze tobacco industry campaign contributions, lobbying, and other political activity throughout the United States and elsewhere. The other reports are available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/.