DOCSLIB.ORG

MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES in ALASKA Overview Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES in ALASKA Overview Report WRI REPORT 10 G Street, NE Suite 800 Washington, DC 20002 www.wri.org JAMES STRITTHOLT RUTH NOGUERÓN JOHN BERGQUIST Conservation Biology Institute MILA ALVAREZ 260 SW Madison Ave., Suite 106 Corvallis, OR 97333 www.consbio.org MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA Overview Report MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA AN OVERVIEW REPORT JAMES R. STRITTHOLT RUTH NOGUERÓN JOHN BERGQUIST MILA ÁLVAREZ September 2006 F O R E S T L W A A B T C O H L G WASHINGTON, DC WRI: MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA i KAREN HOLMES EDITOR HYACINTH BILLINGS PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR MAGGIE POWELL LAYOUT Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly treatment of responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topic stated, however, all the interpretation and fi ndings set forth in WRI publications are and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and those of the authors. © 2006 World Resources Institute © 2006 Conservation Biology Institute All rights reserved. ISBN: 1-56973-622-7 Cover Photographs: Alaska Highway © iStockphoto.com/ra-photo; Brown Bear © iStockphoto.com/Vera Bogaerts; Mountain Glacier Lake © iStockphoto.com/Sunday Riley; Glacier © iStockphoto.com/Marketa Ebert Background satellite picture: US Geological Survey. Landsat 7 ETM + Satellite Sensor. 1999 WRI: MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA ii CONTENTS Acknowledgments ........................................................................................v Acronyms ......................................................................................................vi Executive Summary ......................................................................................1 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................7 2. Mapping Approach and Criteria ..............................................................10 2.1 Criteria for Determination of “Intactness” ...........................................10 2.2 Defi nition of Intact Forest Landscapes (IFLs) .....................................11 2.3 Defi nition of Forest Landscape Fragments (FLFs) and Why These Tracts Are Important .........................................................12 3. Methods .....................................................................................................13 3.1 Delineation of the Study Area .............................................................13 3.2 Mapping Intact Forest Landscapes and Forest Landscape Fragments ................................................................14 3.3 Additional Analyses .............................................................................16 3.4 Limitations of the Analysis ..................................................................17 4. Results .......................................................................................................20 5. Conclusions and Next Steps ....................................................................28 Map Section ...................................................................................................31 References .....................................................................................................45 Appendix 1: Detailed Method .......................................................................47 Appendix 2: Ecological Characteristics of Alaska’s Boreal Zones and Coastal Temperate Forests ...............................................51 Appendix 3: Review Process .........................................................................59 Appendix 4: Statistical Data .........................................................................62 WRI: MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA iii TABLES, FIGURES, AND MAPS Figures Tables 1. Classifi cation and Size Thresholds for Blocks of Un- 1. Buffering of Human Infrastructure Features in Map- disturbed Forest Landscapes in Alaska’s Boreal and ping Alaska’s Boreal Forests, Compared with Buffer- Coastal Temperate Forests (thousands of ha) ing Used in Canada and Russia Mapping Studies 2. Comparison of Techniques for Eliminating Areas with 2. Overview of Land Ownership in Study Area and State- Evidence of Human Disturbance Using GIS Data Layers wide Alaska 3. Two-Step Process for Detecting Areas of Human Dis- turbance in Alaska’s Forest Landscapes Maps 1 4 . Study Area and Distribution of Satellite Imagery Used . Share of Alaska’s Land Area in Intact Forest Land- in This Analysis scapes, Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Landscape Fragments, by Forest Zone 2. Ecological Zones Defi ned in the Study Area 5. Land Ownership in Alaska by Agency (millions of ha 3. Ownership Map owned) and Share of Land in Intact Forest Landscapes, 4. Protected Areas in Alaska Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Landscape Fragments 5 6 . Data Sources for the Analysis of Forest Composition . Share of Land Ownership in Intact Forest Landscapes, in Boreal Forests Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Landscape Fragments in Alaska’s Boreal and Coastal Regions, by Agency 6. Intact Forest Landscapes and Forest Landscape Frag- ments in the Boreal Region 7. Share of Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Is- lands and Forest Landscape Fragments with Protected 7. Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Areas, and For- Status, by Forest Zone est Landscape Fragments in the Kenai-Yakutat Zone 8. Share of Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Is- 8. Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and lands, and Forest Landscape Fragments with Protected Forest Landscape Fragments in the Tongass Zone Status, by Size Class 9. Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and 9. Share of Intact Forest Landscapes and Undisturbed Forest Landscape Fragments in the Kenai-Yakutat Islands with Protected Status Versus Share in Inven- Zone toried Roadless Areas, by Forest Zone in Alaska’s 10. Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, Forest Coastal Region Landscape Fragments, Protected Areas and Invento- 10. Share of Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Is- ried Roadless Areas in the Tongass Zone lands, and Forest Landscape Fragments with Protected 11. Forests and Non-Forest Vegetation in Intact Forest Status Versus Share in Inventoried Roadless Areas, by Landscapes and Forest Landscape Fragments in the Size Class Boreal Region 11 . Distribution of Forest Canopy Cover in Intact For- 12. Forests and Non-Forest Vegetation in Intact Forest est Landscapes and Forest Landscape Fragments in Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Land- Alaska’s Boreal Region, by Size Class and Forest Zone scape Fragments in the Kenai-Yakutat Zone 12 . Distribution of Land Cover Types in Intact Forest 13. Forests and Non-Forest Vegetation in Intact Forest Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Land- Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Land- scape Fragments in Kenai-Yakutat Zone scape Fragments in the Tongass Zone 13 . Distribution of Land Cover Types in Intact Forest 14. Fire Disturbances in Boreal Intact Forest Landscapes Landscapes, Undisturbed Islands, and Forest Land- and Forest Landscape Fragments scape Fragments in Tongass Zone 14. Area and Frequency of Forest Fires in Alaska’s Boreal Region, 1990–2005 WRI: MAPPING UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPES IN ALASKA iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his report would not have been possible without Stephen Adam for their critical support in the last phases the data, information, and technical and scientifi c of the project. Former WRI staff Dirk Bryant, Jill Hartsig, Tadvice from many colleagues. David Albert, Frank Ralph Ridder, Kumiko Shimamoto, and Jenny Frankel- Ahern, Eugene Degayner, Page Else, Gary Fischer, Shane Reed also supported the project securing funding, manag- Feirer, Rod Flynn, Jason Geck, Mike Heiner, Eric Ka- ing, and conducting research and fact-checking for this sischke, Winifred B. Kessler, Matt Kirchhoff, Jerry Minick, report. Tyson Walker conducted a portion of the analysis John Payne, Will Putman, John Schoen, Kenneth Winter- and mapping. Within CBI, we acknowledge the advice, berger, Evie Witten, Abby Wyer, and Ma Zhenkui provided help, and support of Kim Bredensteiner, Pamela Frost, useful comments, data, information, and guidance that Gerald Heilman, Nick Slosser, and Nancy Staus. The skill- substantially improved our work. ful editing of Karen Holmes substantially improved our effectiveness communicating the many complexities of We benefi ted greatly from experiences from colleagues this work. mapping intactness in Russia and Canada. Thanks to Dmitry Aksenov, Alexey Yaroshenko, and Peter Potapov, We are grateful for the support of the Surdna Founda- and thanks to Peter Lee and Aran O’Carroll for all their tion, the WestWind Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott support and guidance. Foundation, Norm Thompson Inc., and the Bank of Amer- ica. Their fi nancial support was integral to the develop- Thanks also to our colleagues at WRI and CBI who were ment of this project. All Geographic Information Systems generous with their time, input and support through- (GIS) and remote sensing analyses were completed using out the project. At WRI, David Jhirad, Brad Kinder, Lars software donated by Environmental Systems Research In- Laestadius, Susan Minnemeyer, and Janet Ranganathan stitute Inc. (ESRI) and Leica Geosystems (ERDAS). provided invaluable comments to early versions of the report. Gayle Coolidge and Jennie Hommel shepherded The Landsat satellite images used in this work were ob- the manuscript
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modeling Alaska Boreal Forests with a Controlled Trend Surface Approacha Mo Zhou and Jingjing Liang*
    2010 Joint Meeting of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium and the Southern Mensurationists MoDelInG AlASKA BoreAl ForeSTS WITH A ConTrolleD TrenD SUrFACe APProACHa Mo Zhou and Jingjing Liang* ABSTrACT nonspatial model of Liang (2010). With remote sensing data and the Geographic Information System (GIS), stand- An approach of Controlled Trend Surface was proposed to simultaneously level predictions were aggregated to tentatively map forest take into consideration large-scale spatial trends and nonspatial effects. dynamics of the entire region. A geospatial model of the Alaska boreal forest was developed from 446 permanent sample plots, which addressed large-scale spatial trends in recruitment, diameter growth, and mortality. The model was tested on The Alaska boreal forest is generally defined as a biome two sets of validation plots and the results suggest that the controlled characterized by coniferous forests. In this study, it trend surface model was generally more accurate than both nonspatial and represented a vast area composed of the following conventional trend surface models. With this model, we mapped the forest ecoregions: Interior Alaska-Yukon lowland Taiga, Cook dynamics of the entire Alaska boreal region by aggregating predicted stand states across the region. Inlet Taiga, and Copper Plateau Taiga. Forestry is very important for the state of Alaska (AlaskaDNR 2006; Wurtz and others 2006), and is an indispensable component of rural economies (AlaskaDNR 2006). Liang (2010) develops InTroDUCTIon the first Matrix Model for all major Alaska boreal tree species which is tested to be much more accurate than the Geospatial effects at large scales have been reported in two growth and yield tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Biodiversity Impacts of Crop-Based Biofuels
    Climate and Climate biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels crop-based impacts of biodiversity Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Pieter Elshout Pieter Pieter Elshout PIETER ELSHOUT Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Colofon Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Design/Lay-out Proefschriftenbalie, Nijmegen Print Ipskamp Printing, Nijmegen ISBN 978-94-028-1513-9 © Pieter Elshout, 2019 Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 11 juni 2019 om 14.30 uur precies door Petrus Marinus Franciscus Elshout geboren op 22 september 1987 te Waalwijk Promotor Prof. dr. M.A.J. Huijbregts Copromotoren Dr. R. van Zelm Dr. M. van der Velde (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italië) Manuscriptcommissie Prof. dr. ir. A.J. Hendriks Prof. dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Prof. dr. A.P.C. Faaij (RUG) Table of Contents Chapter 1 General Introduction 7 Chapter 2 A spatially explicit greenhouse gas balance of biofuel production: case studies of corn bioethanol and soybean biodiesel produced in the United States 17 Chapter 3 Greenhouse gas payback times for crop-based biofuels 37 Chapter 4 Greenhouse gas payback times for first generation bioethanol and biodiesel based on recent crop production data 53 Chapter 5 A spatially explicit data-driven approach to assess the effect of agricultural land occupation on species groups 69 Chapter 6 Global relative species loss due to first generation biofuel production for the transport 87 Chapter 7 Synthesis 103 Appendices 117 Literature 183 Summary | Samenvatting 207 Acknowledgements 215 Curriculum Vitae 219 Publications 221 chapter 1 General Introduction General introduction 9 1.1 | Background Fossil fuels are the dominant energy source in today’s world.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and South America Report (1.8
    United States NHEERL Environmental Protection Western Ecology Division May 1998 Agency Corvallis OR 97333 ` Research and Development EPA ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE Glenn E. Griffith1, James M. Omernik2, and Sandra H. Azevedo3 May 29, 1998 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4465; email: [email protected] 2 Project Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4458; email: [email protected] 3 OAO Corporation 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4361; email: [email protected] A Report to Thomas R. Loveland, Project Manager EROS Data Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD WESTERN ECOLOGY DIVISION NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CORVALLIS, OREGON 97333 1 ABSTRACT Many geographical classifications of the world’s continents can be found that depict their climate, landforms, soils, vegetation, and other ecological phenomena. Using some or many of these mapped phenomena, classifications of natural regions, biomes, biotic provinces, biogeographical regions, life zones, or ecological regions have been developed by various researchers. Some ecological frameworks do not appear to address “the whole ecosystem”, but instead are based on specific aspects of ecosystems or particular processes that affect ecosystems. Many regional ecological frameworks rely primarily on climatic and “natural” vegetative input elements, with little acknowledgement of other biotic, abiotic, or human geographic patterns that comprise and influence ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 01/10/2021 08:57:38
    Alaska's Water: A Critical Resource Item Type Technical Report Authors Bredthauer, Stephen R. Citation Bredthauer, S.R., Chairman. 1984. Alaska's water: a critical resource. Proceedings. Alaska Section, American Water Resources Association. Institute of Water Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Report IWR-I06. 224 pp. Publisher University of Alaska, Institute of Water Resources Download date 01/10/2021 08:57:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1819 ALASKA'S WATER: A CRITICAL RESOURCE PROCEEDINGS Stephen R. Bredthauer, Chairman Alaska Section American Water Resources Association Institute of Water Resources University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 Report IWR-106 November 1984 -ii- Bredthauer, S.R_, Chairman. 1984. Alaska's water: a critical resource. Proceedings. Alas]ca Section, American Water Resources Association. Institute of Water Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Report IWR-I06. 224 pp. -iii- -iv- TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUMENTATION. .............................................. 1 Solar and longwave radiation data for southcentral Alaska. .................................................. 3 Instrumentation of the tide-affected Potter Marsh outlet near Anchorage, Alaska............................ 15 FORECASTING. .................................................. 25 Information content of river forecasts................... 27 A relationship between snow course information and runoff.............................................. 37 Impact of glaciers on long-term basin water yield........ 51 RIVER PROCESSES..
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Priority Ecoregions for Amphibian Conservation in the U.S. and Canada
    Acknowledgements This assessment was conducted as part of a priority setting effort for Operation Frog Pond, a project of Tree Walkers International. Operation Frog Pond is designed to encourage private individuals and community groups to become involved in amphibian conservation around their homes and communities. Funding for this assessment was provided by The Lawrence Foundation, Northwest Frog Fest, and members of Tree Walkers International. This assessment would not be possible without data provided by The Global Amphibian Assessment, NatureServe, and the International Conservation Union. We are indebted to their foresight in compiling basic scientific information about species’ distributions, ecology, and conservation status; and making these data available to the public, so that we can provide informed stewardship for our natural resources. I would also like to extend a special thank you to Aaron Bloch for compiling conservation status data for amphibians in the United States and to Joe Milmoe and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program for supporting Operation Frog Pond. Photo Credits Photographs are credited to each photographer on the pages where they appear. All rights are reserved by individual photographers. All photos on the front and back cover are copyright Tim Paine. Suggested Citation Brock, B.L. 2007. Identifying priority ecoregions for amphibian conservation in the U.S. and Canada. Tree Walkers International Special Report. Tree Walkers International, USA. Text © 2007 by Brent L. Brock and Tree Walkers International Tree Walkers International, 3025 Woodchuck Road, Bozeman, MT 59715-1702 Layout and design: Elizabeth K. Brock Photographs: as noted, all rights reserved by individual photographers.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Satellite Lidar, Airborne Lidar, and Ground Plots to Estimate the Amount and Distribution of Aboveground Biomass in Th
    838 ARTICLE Combining satellite lidar, airborne lidar, and ground plots to estimate the amount and distribution of aboveground biomass in the boreal forest of North America1 Hank A. Margolis, Ross F. Nelson, Paul M. Montesano, André Beaudoin, Guoqing Sun, Hans-Erik Andersen, and Michael A. Wulder Abstract: We report estimates of the amount, distribution, and uncertainty of aboveground biomass (AGB) of the different ecoregions and forest land cover classes within the North American boreal forest, analyze the factors driving the error estimates, and compare our estimates with other reported values. A three-phase sampling strategy was used (i) to tie ground plot AGB to airborne profiling lidar metrics and (ii) to link the airborne estimates of AGB to ICESat-GLAS lidar measurements such that (iii) GLAS could be used as a regional sampling tool. We estimated the AGB of the North American boreal forest at 21.8 Pg, with relative error of 1.9% based on 256 GLAS orbits (229 086 pulses). The distribution of AGB was 46.6% for western Canada, 43.7% for eastern Canada, and 9.7% for Alaska. With a single exception, relative errors were under 4% for the three regions and for the major cover types and under 10% at the ecoregion level. The uncertainties of the estimates were calculated using a variance estimator that accounted for only sampling error, i.e., the variability among GLAS orbital estimates, and airborne to spaceborne regression error, i.e., the uncertainty of the model coefficients. Work is ongoing to develop robust statistical techniques for integrating other sources of error such as ground to air regression error and allometric error.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL Instituto De Biociências Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Ecologia
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL Instituto de Biociências Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia Integrando aspectos filogenéticos e funcionais na Biogeografia da Conservação de vertebrados FERNANDA THIESEN BRUM Porto Alegre, março de 2015 Integrando aspectos filogenéticos e funcionais na Biogeografia da Conservação de vertebrados Fernanda Thiesen Brum Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ecologia, do Instituto de Biociências da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências com ênfase em Ecologia. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Leandro da Silva Duarte Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Rafael Dias Loyola Comissão Examinadora Prof. Dr. Andreas Kindel Profa. Dra. Maria João Veloso da Costa Ramos Pereira Prof. Dr. Ricardo Dobrovolski Porto Alegre, março de 2015 ii “A corrida agora é entre às forças tecnocientíficas que estão destruindo o ambiente vivo e aquelas que podem ser aproveitadas para salvá-lo. Estamos em um gargalo de superpopulação e consumismo de desperdício. Se a corrida for vencida, a humanidade pode emergir em condição muito melhor do que no começo e com a maior parte da diversidade da vida ainda intacta.” (The Future of Life – Edward O. Wilson) iii AGRADECIMENTOS Este é o final de uma grande jornada de formação profissional, que começou há mais de dez anos quando entrei na Biologia da UFRGS. Foi uma jornada longa de descobertas e conhecimento, do que quero ser e fazer ao longo da minha vida. Muitas pessoas passaram pela minha vida durante esse tempo, e várias me ajudaram a me tornar a pessoa que eu sou hoje.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Need
    FLP/Alaska AON ALASKA FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF NEED Final Assessment August 23, 2002 FLP/Alaska AON November 1, 2002 FLP/Alaska AON Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Need for Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures, Tables and Maps……………………………………………................iii Alaska Forest Stewardship Committee……………………………………...................iv Introduction to the Forest Legacy Program – Federal and State……………............. 1 The Federal Forest Legacy Program………………………………........................ 1 The Forest Legacy Program in Alaska……………………………......................... 2 Public Involvement in the Assessment of Need………………………………...... 2 Alaska Forest Legacy Program Goals…………..…………………........................ 3 Alaska’s Forest Resource Base: Physical Environment…….………………............. 3 Climate…………………………………………….………………........................ 3 Climatic Zones…………………………………….………………........................ 5 Physiography, Geology and Soils………………….………………....................... 6 Physiographic Regions…………………………….….……………...................... 7 Alaska’s Forest Soils……………………………….….……………...................... 9 Forest Cover, Composition & Ecosystems……………………………….................. 13 Forest vegetation and types ……………………………………………………… 13 Ecoregions; Vegetation, Wildlife & Defining Characteristics of Forested Areas… 13 o Pacific Coastal.......................................................................................... 17 o Cook Inlet Basin ...................................................................................... 20 o Copper River
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Satellite Lidar, Airborne Lidar, and Ground Plots to Estimate
    Combining satellite lidar, airborne lidar, and ground plots to estimate the amount and distribution of aboveground biomass in the boreal forest of North America Margolis, H.A. et. al., Can. J. For. Res. 45: 838–855 (2015) doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0006 Objectives: • This paper reports estimates of the amount, distribution and uncertainty of aboveground biomass (AGB) of the different ecoregions and forest land cover classes within the North American boreal forest. • The authors also analyzed the factors driving the error estimates and compared the study estimates with other available North American estimates. • A three-phase sampling strategy was used to tie ground plot AGB to airborne profiling lidar metrics and to link the airborne estimates of AGB to ICESat-GLAS lidar measurements such that GLAS could be used as a regional sampling tool. • The three-phase sampling strategy involves: 1) building an initial statistical model to link Portable Airborne Laser System (PALS) height measurement to ground plot biomass; 2) building a second model to related the estimated biomass from the airborne lidar to the height metrics obtained by GLAS for the 1325 GLAS pulses that were flown by the aircraft; and 3) using the GLAS height metrics, slope, and land cover for quality-filtered GLAS pulses available to calculate the AGB and carbon stocks by land cover type. • The uncertainties of the AGB estimates were calculated using a variance estimator that accounted for sampling error (i.e., the variability among GLAS orbital estimates) and the airborne-to-spaceborne regression error (i.e. the uncertainty of the model coefficients).
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Dennis Russell Ruez, Jr. 2007
    Copyright by Dennis Russell Ruez, Jr. 2007 The Dissertation Committee for Dennis Russell Ruez, Jr., certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON MAMMALIAN FAUNA COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE DURING THE ADVENT OF NORTH AMERICAN CONTINENTAL GLACIATION IN THE PLIOCENE Committee ________________________________ Christopher J. Bell, Supervisor ________________________________ Timothy Rowe ________________________________ James T. Sprinkle ________________________________ H. Gregory McDonald ________________________________ Richard J. Zakrzewski EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON MAMMALIAN FAUNA COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE DURING THE ADVENT OF NORTH AMERICAN CONTINENTAL GLACIATION IN THE PLIOCENE by Dennis Russell Ruez, Jr., BS, MS Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2007 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For their support and patience, I thank the members of my committee: Chris Bell, Tim Rowe, Greg McDonald, Richard Zakrzewski, and James Sprinkle. Their suggestions, and those of the UT paleo graduate students, are greatly appreciated. I could not have completed this project without the incredible support of the staff at Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument: Neil King, Greg McDonald, Phil Gensler, and Neal Farmer. They provided housing, financial assistance, and their knowledge of the natural history of southern Idaho, including that beyond HAFO. I also appreciate the additional field and lab assistance of seasonal interns and volunteers at HAFO: Tom Anderson, Taffi Ayers, Erica Case, Eric Foemmel, Summer Hinton, Christina Lonzisero, Robert Lorkowski, Amy Morrison, Josh Samuels, Kirs Thompson, George Varhalmi, and Sonny Wong. Mary Thompson and Bill Akersten were extremely gracious in allowing me access to the collections at the Idaho Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice: the Following Report Has Been Prepared Under Contract To
    Notice: The following report has been prepared under contract to Yukon Parks by an independent consulting team. As such, it represents the analysis and views of the consultants only and is not a statement of Yukon Government policy or position. Yukon Parks April 4, 2008 PEEL WATERSHED, YUKON International Significance from the perspective of Parks, Recreation and Conservation Report prepared for: Yukon Parks Department of Environment, Government of Yukon, Whitehorse Report prepared by: Michael J.B. Green, Stephen McCool and James Thorsell in collaboration with UNEP-WCMC Igor Lysenko and Charles Besançon March 2008 FOREWORD This study was commissioned by the Yukon Parks Branch of the Department of Environment, Government of Yukon. Its purpose is to assess the significance of the Peel Watershed, a wilderness region within the central Yukon that is currently undergoing a regional planning process to determine the appropriate balance of uses for the future, including conservation, traditional use, economic development and resource extraction. This report provides an international perspective to the significance of the Peel Watershed within the Arctic, focusing on the extent and quality of this wilderness particularly with respect to its biodiversity and recreational values. In addition to being examined at Arctic and continental (North America) scales, the Peel Watershed is also considered in more detail as a river basin level. Readers with little time at their disposal are encouraged to first look at the Conclusions and Recommendations in the final chapter (5) of this report, in conjunction with the 16 Maps that present much of the technical data in spatial form. More detailed findings in support of the conclusions can be found at the end of the two analytical chapters (3 and 4) that consider the Peel Watershed within an international (Section 3.7) and local river basin context (Section 4.5), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Satellite Lidar, Airborne Lidar and Ground Plots to Estimate the Amount and Distribution of Aboveground Biomass In
    Page 1 of 59 Combining Satellite Lidar, Airborne Lidar and Ground Plots to Estimate the Amount and Distribution of Aboveground Biomass in the Boreal Forest of North America Hank A. Margolis 1,2 , Ross F. Nelson 2, Paul M. Montesano 2,3 , André Beaudoin 4, Guoqing Sun 2,5 , Hans-Erik Andersen 6, Michael A. Wulder 7 1. Centre d’étude de la forêt; Faculté de foresterie, de géographie et de géomatique; Université Laval; Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. Email: [email protected] ; Tel: (418) 656-7120. Corresponding Author 2. Biospheric Sciences Laboratory; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA. Email: [email protected] , 3. Science Systems and Applications Inc., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA. Email: [email protected] 4. Laurentian Forestry Centre; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; 1055 rue du PEPS; Quebec City, QC, G1V 4C7, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 5. University of Maryland; Department of Geographical Sciences; College Park, MD 20742, USA. Email: [email protected] 4. USDA Forest Service; Pacific Northwest Research Station; P.O. Box 352100; Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA. Email: [email protected] 5. Pacific Forestry Centre; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; 506 West Burnside Road; Victoria, BC, V8Z 1M5, Canada. Email: [email protected] Can. J. For. Res. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by University of St. Andrews - Library on 04/24/15 Revised Version: Submitted to the Canadian Journal of Forest Research For personal use only.
    [Show full text]