DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Need

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Need FLP/Alaska AON ALASKA FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF NEED Final Assessment August 23, 2002 FLP/Alaska AON November 1, 2002 FLP/Alaska AON Forest Legacy Program Assessment of Need for Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures, Tables and Maps……………………………………………................iii Alaska Forest Stewardship Committee……………………………………...................iv Introduction to the Forest Legacy Program – Federal and State……………............. 1 The Federal Forest Legacy Program………………………………........................ 1 The Forest Legacy Program in Alaska……………………………......................... 2 Public Involvement in the Assessment of Need………………………………...... 2 Alaska Forest Legacy Program Goals…………..…………………........................ 3 Alaska’s Forest Resource Base: Physical Environment…….………………............. 3 Climate…………………………………………….………………........................ 3 Climatic Zones…………………………………….………………........................ 5 Physiography, Geology and Soils………………….………………....................... 6 Physiographic Regions…………………………….….……………...................... 7 Alaska’s Forest Soils……………………………….….……………...................... 9 Forest Cover, Composition & Ecosystems……………………………….................. 13 Forest vegetation and types ……………………………………………………… 13 Ecoregions; Vegetation, Wildlife & Defining Characteristics of Forested Areas… 13 o Pacific Coastal.......................................................................................... 17 o Cook Inlet Basin ...................................................................................... 20 o Copper River Basin................................................................................... 22 o Interior Boreal Forests.............................................................................. 23 Species of Special Concern...................................................................................... 25 Historical and Social Context for Alaska’s Forest Resources .................................... 28 Historical Perspective of Alaska’s Forests............................................................... 28 Land Ownership…………………………………………………………………... 29 Alaska’s Population and People............................................................................... 34 Natural Resource-based Economy........................................................................... 36 Forest Products Industry.......................................................................................... 36 Tourism.................................................................................................................... 37 Salmon Fishery........................................................................................................ 37 Subsistence.............................................................................................................. 37 Forest-based Recreation........................................................................................... 39 Watersheds............................................................................................................... 39 Threats to Alaska’s Forests...................................................................................... 40 Existing Measures to Conserve Alaska’s Forests.................................................... 42 Alaska’s Forest Legacy Program................................................................................. 44 FLP/Alaska AON Environmentally Important Forests in Alaska ............................................................ 44 Alaska Forest Legacy Program Project Evaluation Criteria........................................ 44 Forest Legacy Area Eligibility Criteria....................................................................... 47 Alaska’s Forest Legacy Area...................................................................................... 49 Forest Legacy Area Descriptions................................................................................ 51 References…………………………………………………………………………………….. 55 APPENDICES Appendix A: List of public meetings & Public Information Packet Appendix B: Summary of public comments Appendix C: University of Alaska Lands & Mental Health Trust Lands: Special cases regarding the Forest Legacy Program in Alaska FLP/Alaska AON List of Maps & Tables Maps Map 1 Alaska Place Names and Roads Page 4 Map 2 Climatic Zones of Alaska Page 5 Map 3 Physiographic Regions of Alaska Page 8 Map 4 Distribution of Permafrost Page 10 Map 5 Primary Soil Texture Page 11 Map 6 Forested land Cover Classification Page 14 Map 7 Ecoregions of Alaska Page 15 Map 8 Forested Areas Overlaid on the Ecoregions of Alaska Page 16 Map 9 Extent of Insect and Disease Damage Page 21 Map 10 Ecoregions Containing Species of Special Concern Page 27 Map 11 Generalized Landownership and Management Page 30 Map 12 Borough and Native Corporation Boundaries Page 32 Map 13 Distribution of Native Allotments Page 33 Map 14 Population Changes in Alaska Census Areas, 1990-2000 Page 35 Map 15 Conservation Units in Alaska Page 48 Map 16 Alaska’s Forest Legacy Area Page 50 Tables Table 1 Summary of soil types & characteristics by ecological region & forest type Page 12 Table 2 Species, Subspecies or Populations listed as Species of Special Concern or on Audubon Watch List Page 26 Table 3 Summary Data Regarding Native Allotment Conveyances Page 31 Table 4 Landownership in Alaska Page 34 Table 5 Sizes of Alaska’s Communities Page 35 Table 6 Annual Subsistence Harvest Per Person, and What It Would Cost To Purchase That Food Page 38 Table 7 Volume of Fish and Wildlife Harvested in Alaska by Harvest Category Page 39 Table 8 Pollutant Sources in Alaska Waters Page 40 Table 9 Land Trusts in Alaska Page 43 FLP/Alaska AON Alaska’s Forest Stewardship Committee Ole Anderesson Steve Bush Douglas Hanson Max Huhndorf Allen Lemen John Mohorcich Steve Glos Mitch Michaud Jimmy LaVoie George Matz Charlie Nash Erica Reith Dr. Bob Wheeler Dick Zobel 8/23/02 FLP/Alaska AON INTRODUCTION TO THE FOREST LEGACY PROGRAM – FEDERAL AND STATE The Federal Forest Legacy Program The Forest Legacy Program (FLP) identifies and protects environmentally important private forestlands threatened by conversion to non-forest uses. The FLP was established under the authority of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act (CFAA) of 1978, as amended in the 1990 Farm Bill (Food, Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act, [16 U.S.C.2103c et.seq.]). As defined by statue, environmentally important forestlands must possess one or more of the following ecological values: o Opportunities for continuing traditional forest uses o Fish and wildlife habitat o Threatened and endangered species o Riparian areas o Public recreation opportunities o Cultural resources o Scenic resources The Secretary of Agriculture through the United States Forest Service is authorized to provide financial, technical, educational, and related assistance to state, community, and private forest landowners, and is authorized upon request to make a grant to the state to carry out the intent of the FLP in the state, including the acquisition by the state of lands and interests in lands. The goal of the program is to identify and protect important forest areas and aid in conservation through the purchase of conservation easements or fee interests in forestlands. Up to seventy-five percent of total appraised value may be paid by the Federal government through the FLP. State, local, and private interests must provide matching funds to cover any and all costs not paid by the federal government. Conservation easements purchased may include a variety of property rights, but most often restrict development and subdivision. Any restrictions placed on the land are attached to the title, and remain in effect in perpetuity, regardless of sale or ownership. Participation by landowners in the FLP is completely voluntary. All parties must follow Federal appraisal standards and acquisition rules for the acquisition of lands or interests in lands. While conservation easements established under the FLP do not require public access, a landowner may choose to allow public access and recreation on his or her land provided it does not conflict with the FLP goals and management objectives for the property. Conservation easements and the FLP offer alternatives to outright government ownership of land while protecting private forestland from conversion to non-forest uses. Under FLP, the state with significant input from its residents identifies environmentally important forestlands and uses conservation easements or land purchases to conserve and maintain those lands. Under the State Grant Option, the state or its designated p. 1 8/23/02 FLP/Alaska AON representative shall transact all Forest Legacy Program acquisitions. When a conservation easement is purchased using FLP funding, the state or its designated local unit of government must hold the easement. When the state acquires full interest in lands under the FLP, the state must retain ownership. FLP funds may be used to support eligible conservation organizations for activities related to donations of conservation easements. When a conservation easement is donated on behalf of the FLP (to receive credit as a match) to an eligible non-governmental conservation organization, that organization may hold the easement. The Forest Legacy Program in Alaska In January 2001 Governor Tony Knowles selected the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation to implement the FLP in Alaska. The State of Alaska
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States
    This document has been archived. Home is Where the Habitat is An Ecosystem Foundation for Wildlife Distribution and Behavior This article was prepared The lands and near-shore waters of Alaska remaining from recent geomorphic activities such by Page Spencer, stretch from 48° to 68° north latitude and from 130° as glaciers, floods, and volcanic eruptions.* National Park Service, west to 175° east longitude. The immense size of Ecosystems in Alaska are spread out along Anchorage, Alaska; Alaska is frequently portrayed through its super- three major bioclimatic gradients, represented by Gregory Nowacki, USDA Forest Service; Michael imposition on the continental U.S., stretching from the factors of climate (temperature and precipita- Fleming, U.S. Geological Georgia to California and from Minnesota to tion), vegetation (forested to non-forested), and Survey; Terry Brock, Texas. Within Alaska’s broad geographic extent disturbance regime. When the 32 ecoregions are USDA Forest Service there are widely diverse ecosystems, including arrayed along these gradients, eight large group- (retired); and Torre Arctic deserts, rainforests, boreal forests, alpine ings, or ecological divisions, emerge. In this paper Jorgenson, ABR, Inc. tundra, and impenetrable shrub thickets. This land we describe the eight ecological divisions, with is shaped by storms and waves driven across 8000 details from their component ecoregions and rep- miles of the Pacific Ocean, by huge river systems, resentative photos. by wildfire and permafrost, by volcanoes in the Ecosystem structures and environmental Ring of Fire where the Pacific plate dives beneath processes largely dictate the distribution and the North American plate, by frequent earth- behavior of wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Alaska Boreal Forests with a Controlled Trend Surface Approacha Mo Zhou and Jingjing Liang*
    2010 Joint Meeting of the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Symposium and the Southern Mensurationists MoDelInG AlASKA BoreAl ForeSTS WITH A ConTrolleD TrenD SUrFACe APProACHa Mo Zhou and Jingjing Liang* ABSTrACT nonspatial model of Liang (2010). With remote sensing data and the Geographic Information System (GIS), stand- An approach of Controlled Trend Surface was proposed to simultaneously level predictions were aggregated to tentatively map forest take into consideration large-scale spatial trends and nonspatial effects. dynamics of the entire region. A geospatial model of the Alaska boreal forest was developed from 446 permanent sample plots, which addressed large-scale spatial trends in recruitment, diameter growth, and mortality. The model was tested on The Alaska boreal forest is generally defined as a biome two sets of validation plots and the results suggest that the controlled characterized by coniferous forests. In this study, it trend surface model was generally more accurate than both nonspatial and represented a vast area composed of the following conventional trend surface models. With this model, we mapped the forest ecoregions: Interior Alaska-Yukon lowland Taiga, Cook dynamics of the entire Alaska boreal region by aggregating predicted stand states across the region. Inlet Taiga, and Copper Plateau Taiga. Forestry is very important for the state of Alaska (AlaskaDNR 2006; Wurtz and others 2006), and is an indispensable component of rural economies (AlaskaDNR 2006). Liang (2010) develops InTroDUCTIon the first Matrix Model for all major Alaska boreal tree species which is tested to be much more accurate than the Geospatial effects at large scales have been reported in two growth and yield tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska
    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Characteristics in Cook Inlet Area, Alaska
    SOCIE?I’YOF PETROLEUMENGINEERSOF AIME 6200 North CentralExpressway *R SPE 1588 Dallas,Texas 752C6 THIS IS A PREPRINT--- SUBJECTTO CORRECTION Geological Characteristics in Cook Inlet Area, Alaska Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/66FM/All-66FM/SPE-1588-MS/2087697/spe-1588-ms.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 By ThomasE. Kelly,Jr. MemberAIYE, Mickl T. Halbouty,Houston,Tex. @ Copyright 19G6 Americsn Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc. This paper was preparedfor the 41st AnnualFall Meetingof the Societyof PetroleumEngineers of AIME, to be held in Dallas,l?ex.,Oct. 2-5, 1966. permissionto copy is restrictedto an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrationsmay not be copied. The abstractshouldcontainconspicu- ous acknowledgmentof whereand by whom the paper is presented. Publicationelsewhereafter publica- tion in the JOURNALOF l?i’TROI.WJMTECHNOLOGYor the SOCIETYOF PETROLEUMENGINEERSJOURNALis usually grantedupon requestto the Editorof the appropriatejournalprovideciagreementto give propercredit is made. Discussionof this paper is invited. Three copiesof any discussionshouldbe sent to the Societyof PetroleumEngineersoffice. Such discussionmay be presentedat the abovemeetingand, with the paper,may be consideredfor publicationin one of the two WE magazines. v, The Cook Inlet basin is a narrow, Although the general characteristics elongate trough of Mesozoic and Ter- of the basin are fairly well known, tiary sediments located north of new information, as it is made avail- latitude 59° in south-central Alaska able will cause many revisions of the (Fig. 1). The basin covers approxi- stratigraphic and structural fabric mately 11,000 square miles of th~ before a complete geological picture northerripart of the Matanuska geo- is possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Biodiversity Impacts of Crop-Based Biofuels
    Climate and Climate biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels crop-based impacts of biodiversity Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Pieter Elshout Pieter Pieter Elshout PIETER ELSHOUT Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Colofon Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Design/Lay-out Proefschriftenbalie, Nijmegen Print Ipskamp Printing, Nijmegen ISBN 978-94-028-1513-9 © Pieter Elshout, 2019 Climate and biodiversity impacts of crop-based biofuels Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 11 juni 2019 om 14.30 uur precies door Petrus Marinus Franciscus Elshout geboren op 22 september 1987 te Waalwijk Promotor Prof. dr. M.A.J. Huijbregts Copromotoren Dr. R. van Zelm Dr. M. van der Velde (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italië) Manuscriptcommissie Prof. dr. ir. A.J. Hendriks Prof. dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Prof. dr. A.P.C. Faaij (RUG) Table of Contents Chapter 1 General Introduction 7 Chapter 2 A spatially explicit greenhouse gas balance of biofuel production: case studies of corn bioethanol and soybean biodiesel produced in the United States 17 Chapter 3 Greenhouse gas payback times for crop-based biofuels 37 Chapter 4 Greenhouse gas payback times for first generation bioethanol and biodiesel based on recent crop production data 53 Chapter 5 A spatially explicit data-driven approach to assess the effect of agricultural land occupation on species groups 69 Chapter 6 Global relative species loss due to first generation biofuel production for the transport 87 Chapter 7 Synthesis 103 Appendices 117 Literature 183 Summary | Samenvatting 207 Acknowledgements 215 Curriculum Vitae 219 Publications 221 chapter 1 General Introduction General introduction 9 1.1 | Background Fossil fuels are the dominant energy source in today’s world.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and South America Report (1.8
    United States NHEERL Environmental Protection Western Ecology Division May 1998 Agency Corvallis OR 97333 ` Research and Development EPA ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE Glenn E. Griffith1, James M. Omernik2, and Sandra H. Azevedo3 May 29, 1998 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4465; email: [email protected] 2 Project Officer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4458; email: [email protected] 3 OAO Corporation 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333 phone: 541-754-4361; email: [email protected] A Report to Thomas R. Loveland, Project Manager EROS Data Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD WESTERN ECOLOGY DIVISION NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CORVALLIS, OREGON 97333 1 ABSTRACT Many geographical classifications of the world’s continents can be found that depict their climate, landforms, soils, vegetation, and other ecological phenomena. Using some or many of these mapped phenomena, classifications of natural regions, biomes, biotic provinces, biogeographical regions, life zones, or ecological regions have been developed by various researchers. Some ecological frameworks do not appear to address “the whole ecosystem”, but instead are based on specific aspects of ecosystems or particular processes that affect ecosystems. Many regional ecological frameworks rely primarily on climatic and “natural” vegetative input elements, with little acknowledgement of other biotic, abiotic, or human geographic patterns that comprise and influence ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Studies of the Lower Cook Inlet COST No.1 Wei Alaska Outer Contine Tal Shelf
    Geologic Studies of the Lower Cook Inlet COST No.1 Wei Alaska Outer Contine tal Shelf GEOLOGIC STUDIES OF THE LOWER COOK INLET COST NO.1 WELL, ALASKA OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF The ODECO Ocean Ranger, a semisubmersible drilling vessel, on location in lower Cook Inlet drilling the COST No.1 well. The view is southwest with Augustine Volcano, an active andesiticvolcano, on the horizon.ln the summerof1977 Atlantic Richfield, the operator, with 18 other participants from the petroleum industry drilled the well in Block No. 489 to a total depth of 3,775 .6 m. The well penetrated rocks that ranged in age from Late Jurassic to early Cenozoic. This well, drilled just before the opening of OCS Lease Sale No. Cl, confirmed among other things that Lower and Upper Cretaceous rocks are present under lower Cook Inlet and, as an additional bonus, penetrated several Upper Cre­ taceous sandstone bodies with petroleum reservoir potential. Geologic Studies of the Lower Cook Inlet COST No.1 Well, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Leslie B. Magoon, Editor U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1596 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas l. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1986 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Geologic studies of the Lower Cook Inlet COST No. 1 well, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. (U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1596) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.3: 1596 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of New 1:63,360-Scale Geologic Mapping of the Iniskin Peninsula, Lower Cook Inlet, Alaska 3
    Chapter 1–Overview of new 1:63,360-scale geologic mapping of the Iniskin Peninsula, lower Cook Inlet, Alaska 3 CHAPTER 1 OVERVIEW OF NEW 1:63,360-SCALE GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE INISKIN PENINSULA, LOWER COOK INLET, ALASKA Robert J. Gillis1, Marwan A. Wartes1, Trystan M. Herriott1, Katharine Bull2, Paul L. Decker3, and Paul M. Betka1 The Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys (DGGS) and the Alaska Division of Oil and Gas conducted new inch-to-mile (1:63,360-scale) geologic mapping of approximately 235 square miles on the Iniskin Peninsula and adjacent area in summer 2013 (fig. 1-1). The project was part of DGGS’s Cook Inlet basin analysis program that has focused on geologic components of Cook Inlet petroleum systems since 2006, initially in the producing Cenozoic stratigraphy. In 2009, our field investigations transitioned toward the less-well-understood Mesozoic strata, which features oil seeps in several locations and contains the source interval for the trapped oil that is being extracted from the Cook Inlet basin today. The map area straddles the margin of the Early to Late Jurassic Talkeetna arc–forearc basin system and encompasses a relatively complete, but structurally dissected, crustal section from the arc roots upward through the arc edifice into the clastic basin fill. The arc complex has been exhumed against the forearc basin in the hanging wall of the regional-scale, northwest-dipping Bruin Bay fault system and consists mainly of Early to early Middle Jurassic granitoids and Lower Jurassic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. The footwall of the fault system bounding the forearc basin is composed of a > 4,800-m-thick succession of Middle to Upper Jurassic marine strata that are folded by a large syncline–anticline pair.
    [Show full text]
  • Cook Inlet Areawide Oil and Gas Lease Sale
    November 2, 2018 COOK INLET AREAWIDE OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE Final Finding of the Director Recommended citation: DNR (Alaska Department of Natural Resources). 2018. Cook Inlet areawide oil and gas lease sale: Written Finding of the Director. November 2, 2018. Questions or comments about this final finding should be directed to: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas 550 W. 7th Ave., Suite 1100 Anchorage, AK 99501-3560 907-269-8800 The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, please write to: Alaska Department of Natural Resources ADA Coordinator P.O. Box 111000 Juneau, AK 99811-1000 The department’s ADA Coordinator can be reached via phone at the following numbers: (VOICE) 907-465-2400 (Statewide Telecommunication Device for the Deaf) 1-800-770-8973, or (FAX) 907-465-3886 For information on alternative formats and questions on this publication, please contact: Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Oil and Gas 550 W. 7th Ave., Suite 1100 Anchorage, AK 99501-3560 Phone 907-269-8800 Division of Oil and Gas Contributors: Kirk Morgan Lynn Noel Bryan Taylor Michael Redlinger Jonathan Schick Kyle Smith COOK INLET AREAWIDE OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE FINAL FINDING OF THE DIRECTOR Prepared by: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas November 2, 2018 Executive Summary Contents Page A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology, Articles 60 -119 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH 1962
    Short Papers in Geology and Hydrology, Articles 60 -119 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH 1962 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 450-C ScientiJSc notes and sammarier of invertigationr prepared 6y members oJ the Geologic and Water Resources Divisions in the Jields of geology, hydro logy, and allied sciences UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. FOREWORD This collection of 60 short papers on subjects in the fields of geology, hydrology, and related sciences is the second of a series to be released during the year as chapters of Professional Paper 450. The papers in this chapter report on the scientific and economic results of current work by members of the Geologic and Water Resources Divisions of the United States Geological Survey. Some of the papers announce new discoveries or present observations on problems of limited scope; other papers draw conclusions from more extensive or continuing investigations that in large part will be discussed in greater detail in reports to be published in the future. Chapter A of this series, to be published later in the year, will present a synopsis of results from a wide range of work done during the present fiscal year. THOMASB. NOLAN, Director. CONTENTS Page Foreword------------------------------- 111 GEOLOGIC STUDIES Economic geology 60. Eocene topography of the central East Tintic Mountains, Utah, by Hal T. Morris and James A. Anderson-------- Cl 61. A rare sodium niobate mineral from Colorado, by Raymond L.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 01/10/2021 08:57:38
    Alaska's Water: A Critical Resource Item Type Technical Report Authors Bredthauer, Stephen R. Citation Bredthauer, S.R., Chairman. 1984. Alaska's water: a critical resource. Proceedings. Alaska Section, American Water Resources Association. Institute of Water Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Report IWR-I06. 224 pp. Publisher University of Alaska, Institute of Water Resources Download date 01/10/2021 08:57:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1819 ALASKA'S WATER: A CRITICAL RESOURCE PROCEEDINGS Stephen R. Bredthauer, Chairman Alaska Section American Water Resources Association Institute of Water Resources University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 Report IWR-106 November 1984 -ii- Bredthauer, S.R_, Chairman. 1984. Alaska's water: a critical resource. Proceedings. Alas]ca Section, American Water Resources Association. Institute of Water Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Report IWR-I06. 224 pp. -iii- -iv- TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUMENTATION. .............................................. 1 Solar and longwave radiation data for southcentral Alaska. .................................................. 3 Instrumentation of the tide-affected Potter Marsh outlet near Anchorage, Alaska............................ 15 FORECASTING. .................................................. 25 Information content of river forecasts................... 27 A relationship between snow course information and runoff.............................................. 37 Impact of glaciers on long-term basin water yield........ 51 RIVER PROCESSES..
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf
    ~~~_-. 1.- _ ~ .~,_ ---,: ••• Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf Interim Lower CookInlet Synthesis Report December 1977 Prepared under contract by: Science Applications, Inc. "oATMOS",., ~I" ~.s>/C' <3'. ~ ~ t I • • \ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ~ ~.~€z •• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ""'0", ",,,,,fJ' Environmental Research Laboratories .<>.qIi'rJlfENT Of co~ ,NOTICE The Environmental ResearchLaboratorie~ do not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to the Environmental Research Laboratories or to this publication furnished by the Environmental Research Labora- tories in any advertising or sales promotion which would in- dicate or imply that the Environmental Research Laboratories approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the adver- tised product to be used or purchased because of this Envi- ronmental Research Laboratories publication. i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION . OBJECTIVES AND HISTORY OF THE SYNTHESIS REPORT 1 CONTENTS OF THE REPORT 3 GRAPHICS 4 LH1ITATIONS .. 4 PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS 5 Chapter 2. NATURAL REGIONS OF COOK INLET 10 REGION ONE -- LOWER COOK INLET CENTRAL ZONE 12 REGION TWO -- KAMISHAK BAY 16 REGION THREE -- KACHEMAK BAY 22 REGION FOUR -- KENNEDY ENTRANCE 34 REGION FIVE -- KALGIN ISLAND AREA 39 REGION SIX -- UPPER COOK INLET 41 Chapter 3. STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OVERVIEW 44 CLIMATE . 45 REGIONAL SETTING 46 SEA ICE . 50 CIRCULATION . 51 CHEMICAL OCEANOGRAPHY 67 BIOTIC RESOURCES . 72 Primary Production 72 Zooplankton . 80 Benthic Invertebrates 81 Fish . 97 Birds 104 Mammals 112 Vulnerability and Food Chain Implications 115 CONCEPTUAL MODELS: PHYSICO-CHEMICAL BEHAVIOR OF AN OIL SLICK AND THE FATE OF TOXIC tlJETALS .
    [Show full text]