DOCSLIB.ORG

Geological Characteristics in Cook Inlet Area, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SOCIE?I’YOF PETROLEUMENGINEERSOF AIME 6200 North CentralExpressway *R SPE 1588 Dallas,Texas 752C6 THIS IS A PREPRINT--- SUBJECTTO CORRECTION Geological Characteristics in Cook Inlet Area, Alaska Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/66FM/All-66FM/SPE-1588-MS/2087697/spe-1588-ms.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 By ThomasE. Kelly,Jr. MemberAIYE, Mickl T. Halbouty,Houston,Tex. @ Copyright 19G6 Americsn Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, Inc. This paper was preparedfor the 41st AnnualFall Meetingof the Societyof PetroleumEngineers of AIME, to be held in Dallas,l?ex.,Oct. 2-5, 1966. permissionto copy is restrictedto an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrationsmay not be copied. The abstractshouldcontainconspicu- ous acknowledgmentof whereand by whom the paper is presented. Publicationelsewhereafter publica- tion in the JOURNALOF l?i’TROI.WJMTECHNOLOGYor the SOCIETYOF PETROLEUMENGINEERSJOURNALis usually grantedupon requestto the Editorof the appropriatejournalprovideciagreementto give propercredit is made. Discussionof this paper is invited. Three copiesof any discussionshouldbe sent to the Societyof PetroleumEngineersoffice. Such discussionmay be presentedat the abovemeetingand, with the paper,may be consideredfor publicationin one of the two WE magazines. v, The Cook Inlet basin is a narrow, Although the general characteristics elongate trough of Mesozoic and Ter- of the basin are fairly well known, tiary sediments located north of new information, as it is made avail- latitude 59° in south-central Alaska able will cause many revisions of the (Fig. 1). The basin covers approxi- stratigraphic and structural fabric mately 11,000 square miles of th~ before a complete geological picture northerripart of the Matanuska geo- is possible. This report revises syncline and is bounded by the Kenai and refines certain concepts of the and Chugach Mountains”on the east, basin which were discussed in an the Talkeetna Mountains and the earlier work (Kelly, 1963). In cer- Copper River on the northeast, the tain aspects it may be considered q Susitna basin on the north, the progress report that will require Chigmit Mountains and the Alaska periodic updating”as new information Range on the west , and the Shelikof is made available. Strait on the south. In less than ten years the basin PREVIOUS WORK has achieved su.@ a degree of promi- nence as a pet~’oleumprovince that A list of references includes many it ranks with’bff-shore areas in published reports wri~ten chiefly by California and the Gulf Coast as the members of the U. S. Geological Sur- most promising future source of large vey who investigated the mineral re- domestic reserves. sources of the Cook Inlet basin. The Oil and gas exploration in the first indications of petroleum in basin has rapidly increased in the the basin and the early attempts to past few years and is currently at find production were documented by its highest level in history. Martin (1905). Ma&her (1925), fur- ther described the petroleum poten- References and illustrations ac end tial of the southwestern part of the of paper. basin in the Kamishak Bay area. Miller, Payne and Gyrc (1957), pre- TRIASSIC ROCKS sen~ed the first comprehensive in- vestigation dealing specifically with Paleozoic and early Mesozoic’sedi- potential petroleum provinces of mentation occurred in a linear de- Alaska which included the Cook Inlet pression that occupied most of south- Mesozoic and Tertiary basin. Ayres ern Alaska. Volcanic islands and (1959), discussed the regional Tee- archipelagos, emergent throughout tonic framework of the basin as re- the belt, served as loca. .)urcesof lates to preorogenic and postorogenic sediments and provided areas for Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/66FM/All-66FM/SPE-1588-MS/2087697/spe-1588-ms.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 units of the circumpacific geanti- reef limestone deposition. Bedded clinal and geosynclinal evolution cherts comprising a large part of (Kay, 1951). Parkinson (1962), pre- the Triassic System were probably sented the first field paper on the precipitated from volcanic silica basin’s first commercial oil field, and deposited contemporaneously with the Swanson River field. Other work- tuffaceous silts, shales and carbon- ers have recently contributed to the ates. knowledge of the complex stratigraphy Areal Extent and LithologY - Tri- and s~ructure of the basin (Kelly, assic rocks have been identified on 1961, 1963; Hill, 1963). Information the southeastern rim of the basin on the basin architecture was pro- near the town of Seldovia and on the vided by an aeromagnetic study of the western coast of Cook Inlet in the region by Grantz, Zietz, and Andrea- vicinity of Kamishak and Bruin Bays. son (1963). The excellent palyno- The Triassic rocks in the Kachemak logical studies of Wolfe, Hopkins and Bay region include limestone, tuff, Leopold (1965), provided much needed and banded chert, underlain by el- stratigraphic information on the lipsodial lava, slate, and graywacke nonmarine Tertiary rocks of the basin. which may be pre-Triassic in age. The Halbouty Alaska Oil Company STRATIGRAPHY Fritz Creek {/1well located a few miles eastof Homer on the north shore Rocks of Triassic co Recent age of Kachemak Bay penetrated several crop out in the Cook Inlet basin - hundred feet of white platey chert those older than Tertiary, are ex- which is considered to be equivalent posed in scattered localities on the in age to the surface exposures near ~rimeter of the basin, A general- Seldo”~ia. The total thickness of ized correlation chart of the basin the Triassic System in the Cook Inlet is shown in (Fig. 2). Mississippian basin probably exceeds 2000 fee~. and Permian sediments are exposed in a belt trending northwestward through JURASSIC ROCKS the southern Copper River basin and the slate-graywacke sequences com- The Jurassic rocks of southern prioin~ the Kenai-Chugach Ranges, al- Alaska, including the Cook Inlet though generally considered to be of basin, represent the most complete Upper Cretaceous ages may contain sequence of this age on the North Paleozoic rocks, (Martin, Johnson and American continent. The theater for Grant, 1915; Smith, 1939; and Ayres, Early Jurassic sedimentation was 1959)● similar to the Late Triassic, al- The maximum thickness of post-Paleo- though a hiatus of undetermined size zoic sediments deposited in.the deep- is reflected by a period of nonde- est part of the basin is estimated to position at the close of the Triassic. be 40,000 feet. Exploratory drilling During the Middle Jurassic, epeiro- has penetrated an aggregate of 30,000 geny transformed the paleozoic-early feet of sediments ranging in age from Mesozoic sedimentary trough into ge- ‘UpperTriassic to Recent. anticlinal and geosynclinal belts. The Tertiary rocks are discussed in Diastrophism renewed valcanic acti- greater detail in this paper because vity, and batholiths and lesser in- of their economic significance. trusive were emplaced on the north and west sides of the basin. The Naknek-Chinitna contact has been de- Cook Inlet basin became a dynamic scribed as conformable by most writ- structural basin and occupied approxi- ers; however, Barnes and Payne (1956] mately its present position. report the Naknek was deposited on Areal Extent and Lithology - An the eroded surface of older Jurassic unnamed section of Lower Jurassic formations, rocks is exposed on the southwestern Upper Jurassic marine clastic coast of the Kenai Peninsula in the rocks consisting of argillite and A thick se- green-gray siltstone, have been pene- vicinity of Seldovia. Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/SPEATCE/proceedings-pdf/66FM/All-66FM/SPE-1588-MS/2087697/spe-1588-ms.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 quence of Lower Jurassic volcanic trated in wells drilled on the Kenai rocks known as the Talkeetna Form- Peninsula, off-shore Cook Inlet, and ation is exposed in the upper Mata- Susitna Flats. The rocks appear to nuska Valley and adjacent mountains be greatly altered in comparison to and has been penetrated in a few the surface sections exposed in the boreholes on the east side of the southwes~ern shore of the basin and basin. Middle and Upper Jurassic no direct surface-subsurface corre- sediments comprising the Tuxedni, lation has ye~ been published. Chinitna, and Naknek formations are widely distributed along the south- CRETACEOUS ROCKS western shore of Cook Inlet and in the upper Matanuska Valley. Early Cretaceous time w~ascharac- The Lower Jurassic rocks of the terized by shallowing of the seas Seldovia area consist predominately and local emergence reflected by of tuff and volcanic agglomerates. areas of erosion or nondeposition The unit is not fossiliferous but is along linear structural belts. lithologically similar, and perhaps Areal Extent and Lithology - Upper partly equivalent in age, to the Cretaceous rocks are exposed in Talkeetna Formation. The Talkeetna the Matanuska Valley along the Mal- formation is composed of volcanic keetna Mountain front, in the Chugach detritus containing fossil plants Mountains north of Turnagain Arm, and and marine invertebrates. The base in the extr,smesouthwestern part of of the formation has not been ob- the basin on the Alaska Peninsula served but the total thickness is es- south of Kamishak Bay. These rocks timated to be several thousand feet. have been encountered in several The Middle Jurassic Tuxedni Form- wells drilled on the eastern side of ation consists of sandstone, shale, the basin on the Kenai
Recommended publications
  • Or Early Callovian) Ammonites from Alaska and Montana

    Or Early Callovian) Ammonites from Alaska and Montana

    Jurassic (Bathonian or Early Callovian) Ammonites From Alaska and Montana By RALPH W. IMLAY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 374-C Descr$tions and illustrations of ctphalopods of possible late Middle Jurasric (Bathonian) age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page C- 1 Age of the faunas-Continued C- 1 Callovian versus Bathonian in Greenland- - - - _ - - _ - - C-2 Callovian versus Bathonian in Alaska and Montana- -- - Stratigraphic summary- __ --______ _ - - - -- - ---.- -- -.- - - C-2 Paleogeographic considerations- - -_-- -- ---- ---- Cook Inlet region, Alaska -______--------.-.--..--c-2 Summation of the evidence- - - _._ _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - Iniskin Peninsula-_-_______----.--------~.--C-2 Comparisons with other faunas---------___----------- Peninsula north of Chinitna Bay----- __._ _ _._ - C-3 \Vestern interior of Canada- - - -- -- -____------- --- Talkeetna Mountains ----___-_ - - -- ---- - - -- - -- C-3 Arctic region-_-_---___-_----------------------- Western Montana- - -----__-----------------.---C-5 other regions--__-__-____----------------------- Rocky Mountain front north of the Sun River- (2-5 Geographic distribution ___-___ --- - ---------- ------ -- - Drummond area--- ---_____ _--- -- -.-- ---- -- - C-10 Summary of results- --_-____-_----_---_-_----------- Age ofthe faunas-----------_----------------------- GI0 Systematic descriptions--_ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Evidence from Alaska---____________--------------C-10 Literature cited _-_-_---______----------------------- Evidence from Montana --_-_____ --- - - -- .--- --- - - C-12 Index---__--___-_-_------------------------------- ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-3 follow index] PLATE 1. Holcophylloceras, Oecotraustes (Paroecotraustes) ?, and Arctocephalites (Cranocephalites). 2.
  • 1 Paleobotanical Proxies for Early Eocene Climates and Ecosystems in Northern North 2 America from Mid to High Latitudes 3 4 Christopher K

    1 Paleobotanical Proxies for Early Eocene Climates and Ecosystems in Northern North 2 America from Mid to High Latitudes 3 4 Christopher K

    https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2020-32 Preprint. Discussion started: 24 March 2020 c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Paleobotanical proxies for early Eocene climates and ecosystems in northern North 2 America from mid to high latitudes 3 4 Christopher K. West1, David R. Greenwood2, Tammo Reichgelt3, Alexander J. Lowe4, Janelle M. 5 Vachon2, and James F. Basinger1. 6 1 Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, 7 Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Canada. 8 2 Dept. of Biology, Brandon University, 270-18th Street, Brandon, Manitoba R7A 6A9, Canada. 9 3 Department of Geosciences, University of Connecticut, Beach Hall, 354 Mansfield Rd #207, 10 Storrs, CT 06269, U.S.A. 11 4 Dept. of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, U.S.A. 12 13 Correspondence to: C.K West ([email protected]) 14 15 Abstract. Early Eocene climates were globally warm, with ice-free conditions at both poles. Early 16 Eocene polar landmasses supported extensive forest ecosystems of a primarily temperate biota, 17 but also with abundant thermophilic elements such as crocodilians, and mesothermic taxodioid 18 conifers and angiosperms. The globally warm early Eocene was punctuated by geologically brief 19 hyperthermals such as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), culminating in the 20 Early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO), during which the range of thermophilic plants such as 21 palms extended into the Arctic. Climate models have struggled to reproduce early Eocene Arctic 22 warm winters and high precipitation, with models invoking a variety of mechanisms, from 23 atmospheric CO2 levels that are unsupported by proxy evidence, to the role of an enhanced 24 hydrological cycle to reproduce winters that experienced no direct solar energy input yet remained 25 wet and above freezing.
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?

    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
  • Thermochronology of the Talkeetna Intraoceanic Arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf Dating

    Thermochronology of the Talkeetna Intraoceanic Arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf Dating

    TECTONICS, VOL. 30, TC1011, doi:10.1029/2010TC002798, 2011 Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf dating B. R. Hacker,1 Peter B. Kelemen,2 Matthew Rioux,1,3 Michael O. McWilliams,4 Philip B. Gans,1 Peter W. Reiners,5 Paul W. Layer,6 Ulf Söderlund,7 and Jeffrey D. Vervoort8 Received 17 September 2010; revised 8 December 2010; accepted 27 December 2010; published 26 February 2011. [1] As one of two well‐exposed intraoceanic arcs, the of the Talkeetna arc was spatially variable. One‐ Talkeetna arc of Alaska affords an opportunity to under- dimensional finite difference thermal models show that stand processes deep within arcs. This study reports new this kind of spatial variability is inherent to intraoceanic Lu‐Hf and Sm‐Nd garnet ages, 40Ar/39Ar hornblende, arcs with simple construction histories. Citation: Hacker, mica and whole‐rock ages, and U‐Th/He zircon and B. R., P. B. Kelemen, M. Rioux, M. O. McWilliams, P. B. Gans, apatite ages from the Chugach Mountains, Talkeetna P. W. Reiners, P. W. Layer, U. Söderlund, and J. D. Vervoort Mountains, and Alaska Peninsula, which, in conjunc- (2011), Thermochronology of the Talkeetna intraoceanic arc of tion with existing geochronology, constrain the thermal Alaska: Ar/Ar, U‐Th/He, Sm‐Nd, and Lu‐Hf dating, Tectonics, history of the arc. Zircon U‐Pb ages establish the 30, TC1011, doi:10.1029/2010TC002798. main period of arc magmatism as 202–181 Ma in the Chugach Mountains and 183–153 Ma in the 1.
  • NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States

    NSF 03-021, Arctic Research in the United States

    This document has been archived. Home is Where the Habitat is An Ecosystem Foundation for Wildlife Distribution and Behavior This article was prepared The lands and near-shore waters of Alaska remaining from recent geomorphic activities such by Page Spencer, stretch from 48° to 68° north latitude and from 130° as glaciers, floods, and volcanic eruptions.* National Park Service, west to 175° east longitude. The immense size of Ecosystems in Alaska are spread out along Anchorage, Alaska; Alaska is frequently portrayed through its super- three major bioclimatic gradients, represented by Gregory Nowacki, USDA Forest Service; Michael imposition on the continental U.S., stretching from the factors of climate (temperature and precipita- Fleming, U.S. Geological Georgia to California and from Minnesota to tion), vegetation (forested to non-forested), and Survey; Terry Brock, Texas. Within Alaska’s broad geographic extent disturbance regime. When the 32 ecoregions are USDA Forest Service there are widely diverse ecosystems, including arrayed along these gradients, eight large group- (retired); and Torre Arctic deserts, rainforests, boreal forests, alpine ings, or ecological divisions, emerge. In this paper Jorgenson, ABR, Inc. tundra, and impenetrable shrub thickets. This land we describe the eight ecological divisions, with is shaped by storms and waves driven across 8000 details from their component ecoregions and rep- miles of the Pacific Ocean, by huge river systems, resentative photos. by wildfire and permafrost, by volcanoes in the Ecosystem structures and environmental Ring of Fire where the Pacific plate dives beneath processes largely dictate the distribution and the North American plate, by frequent earth- behavior of wildlife species.
  • The Geology, Paleontology and Paleoecology of the Cerro Fortaleza Formation

    The Geology, Paleontology and Paleoecology of the Cerro Fortaleza Formation

    The Geology, Paleontology and Paleoecology of the Cerro Fortaleza Formation, Patagonia (Argentina) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Victoria Margaret Egerton in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2011 © Copyright 2011 Victoria M. Egerton. All Rights Reserved. ii Dedications To my mother and father iii Acknowledgments The knowledge, guidance and commitment of a great number of people have led to my success while at Drexel University. I would first like to thank Drexel University and the College of Arts and Sciences for providing world-class facilities while I pursued my PhD. I would also like to thank the Department of Biology for its support and dedication. I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Kenneth Lacovara, for his guidance and patience. Additionally, I would like to thank him for including me in his pursuit of knowledge of Argentine dinosaurs and their environments. I am also indebted to my committee members, Dr. Gail Hearn, Dr. Jake Russell, Dr. Mike O‘Connor, Dr. Matthew Lamanna, Dr. Christopher Williams and Professor Hermann Pfefferkorn for their valuable comments and time. The support of Argentine scientists has been essential for allowing me to pursue my research. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to work with such kind and knowledgeable people. I would like to thank Dr. Fernando Novas (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales) for helping me obtain specimens that allowed this research to happen. I would also like to thank Dr. Viviana Barreda (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales) for her allowing me use of her lab space while I was visiting Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales.
  • Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska

    Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska

    Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1124 Field-Trip Guide to Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Deposits of the Lower Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, Sheep Mountain, South-Central Alaska Amy E. Draut U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Peter D. Clift School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, U.K. Robert B. Blodgett U.S. Geological Survey–Contractor, Anchorage, AK 99508 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 2006-1124 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior P. Lynn Scarlett, Acting Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 Revised and reprinted: 2006 Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government To download a copy of this report from the World Wide Web: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1124/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. Regional map of the field-trip area. FIGURE 2. Geologic cross section through Sheep Mountain. FIGURE 3. Stratigraphic sections on the south side of Sheep Mountain.
  • Geological Survey Research 1965

    Geological Survey Research 1965

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH 1965 Chapter D GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 525-D Scientific notes and summaries of investiga- tions by members of the Conservation, Geo- logic, and Water Resources Divisions in geology, hydrology, and related fields - UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price $2 GEOLOGIC STUDIES Geochronology Page Implications of new radiometric ages in eastern Connecticut and Massachusetts, by Robert Zartman, George Snyder, T. W.Stern, R.F. Marvin,.and R.C.Bucknam-----------,------------------------------------------------ Reconna&sance of mineral ages of plutons in Elko County, Nev., and vicinity, by R. R. Coats, R. F. Marvin, and T.W.Stern---------------------------------------------------------------------i---------------------- Juragsic plutonism in the Cook Inlet region, Alaska, by R. L. Detterman, B. L. Reed, and M. A. Lanphere ------ ------ Age and distribution of sedimentary zircon as a guide to provenance, by R. S. Houston and J. F. Murphy - - - - - - - - - - - - Carboniferous isotopic age of the metamorphism of the Salmon Hornblende Schist and Abrams Mica Schist, southern Klamath Mountains, Calif.,*by M. A. Lanphere and W. P. Irwin- ------------------,-------------------------- Radiocarbon dates from lliamna Lake, Alaska, by R. L. Detterman, B. L. Reed, and Meyer Rubin
  • Retallack 2021 Coal Balls

    Retallack 2021 Coal Balls

    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 564 (2021) 110185 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Modern analogs reveal the origin of Carboniferous coal balls Gregory Retallack * Department of Earth Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Coal balls are calcareous peats with cellular permineralization invaluable for understanding the anatomy of Coal ball Pennsylvanian and Permian fossil plants. Two distinct kinds of coal balls are here recognized in both Holocene Histosol and Pennsylvanian calcareous Histosols. Respirogenic calcite coal balls have arrays of calcite δ18O and δ13C like Carbon isotopes those of desert soil calcic horizons reflecting isotopic composition of CO2 gas from an aerobic microbiome. Permineralization Methanogenic calcite coal balls in contrast have invariant δ18O for a range of δ13C, and formed with anaerobic microbiomes in soil solutions with bicarbonate formed by methane oxidation and sugar fermentation. Respiro­ genic coal balls are described from Holocene peats in Eight Mile Creek South Australia, and noted from Carboniferous coals near Penistone, Yorkshire. Methanogenic coal balls are described from Carboniferous coals at Berryville (Illinois) and Steubenville (Ohio), Paleocene lignites of Sutton (Alaska), Eocene lignites of Axel Heiberg Island (Nunavut), Pleistocene peats of Konya (Turkey), and Holocene peats of Gramigne di Bando (Italy). Soils and paleosols with coal balls are neither common nor extinct, but were formed by two distinct soil microbiomes. 1. Introduction and Royer, 2019). Although best known from Euramerican coal mea­ sures of Pennsylvanian age (Greb et al., 1999; Raymond et al., 2012, Coal balls were best defined by Seward (1895, p.
  • Mineralogy of Non-Silicified Fossil Wood

    Mineralogy of Non-Silicified Fossil Wood

    Article Mineralogy of Non-Silicified Fossil Wood George E. Mustoe Geology Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA; [email protected]; Tel: +1-360-650-3582 Received: 21 December 2017; Accepted: 27 February 2018; Published: 3 March 2018 Abstract: The best-known and most-studied petrified wood specimens are those that are mineralized with polymorphs of silica: opal-A, opal-C, chalcedony, and quartz. Less familiar are fossil woods preserved with non-silica minerals. This report reviews discoveries of woods mineralized with calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, various iron and copper minerals, manganese oxide, fluorite, barite, natrolite, and smectite clay. Regardless of composition, the processes of mineralization involve the same factors: availability of dissolved elements, pH, Eh, and burial temperature. Permeability of the wood and anatomical features also plays important roles in determining mineralization. When precipitation occurs in several episodes, fossil wood may have complex mineralogy. Keywords: fossil wood; mineralogy; paleobotany; permineralization 1. Introduction Non-silica minerals that cause wood petrifaction include calcite, apatite, iron pyrites, siderite, hematite, manganese oxide, various copper minerals, fluorite, barite, natrolite, and the chromium- rich smectite clay mineral, volkonskoite. This report provides a broad overview of woods fossilized with these minerals, describing specimens from world-wide locations comprising a diverse variety of mineral assemblages. Data from previously-undescribed fossil woods are also presented. The result is a paper that has a somewhat unconventional format, being a combination of literature review and original research. In an attempt for clarity, the information is organized based on mineral composition, rather than in the format of a hypothesis-driven research report.
  • Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska

    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska

    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5
  • Coal Exploration Permit Application for Mental Health Land Coal Lease Mht 9200375 Chickaloon Coal Project

    Coal Exploration Permit Application for Mental Health Land Coal Lease Mht 9200375 Chickaloon Coal Project

    COAL EXPLORATION PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAND COAL LEASE MHT 9200375 CHICKALOON COAL PROJECT Prepared For: Riversdale Alaska LLC A subsidiary of RIVERSDALE RESOURCES PTY LTD Level 2, Chifley Tower 2 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 +61 2 9324 4499 US Cell 907 3016031 [email protected] Prepared By: Michael A. Belowich Alaska Earth Sciences, Inc. 1075 Check Street, Suite 210 Wasilla, Alaska 99654 March 23, 2012 Revised on May 04, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents i List of Figures , Tables, and Plates ii PART A – GENERAL INFORMATION 1.0 Applicant Information iv 2.0 Location of the Exploration v 3.0 Period of Exploration vi 4.0 Ownership of Surface/Subsurface Mineral Estate vi 5.0 Chickaloon Land Owners vii PART B – EXPLORATION AREA DESCRIPTION 1.0 Location, Access and Physiography 1 2.0 Geology-General 4 3.0 Previous Mine History and Exploration Drilling 8 3.1 Chickaloon, Kings River, and Coal Creek Mines 8 3.2 Castle Mountain Mine 11 4.0 Coal Resources and Quality 13 5.0 Land Use 15 6.0 Climate 18 7.0 Hydrology – General 20 7.1 Surface Water 20 7.2 Ground Water 22 8.0 Soils 26 9.0 Vegetation 29 10.0 Birds and Other Terrestrial Wildlife 31 10.1 Birds 31 10.2 Terrestrial Wildlife 33 11.0 Aquatic Wildlife 34 12.0 Cultural and Historical Resources 36 PART C – EXPLORATION AND RECLAMATION PLAN 1.0 Introduction 39 2.0 2012 Surface Drilling Program 40 3.0 Trenching and Test Pits 47 4.0 Geophysical Exploration Methods 49 5.0 Equipment Types/Uses 50 6.0 Environmental Baseline Data Gathering 52 7.0 Borehole Plugging and Reclamation 54 8.0 Revegetation Procedures 57 9.0 Hydrologic Balance Control Measures 58 10.0 Transportation and Facilities 60 11.0 Reclamation Bond 62 i 12.0 Time Table 66 13.0 References 67 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.