DOCSLIB.ORG

Onstitutional Eview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Onstitutional Eview Volume 4, Number 1 ❏ May 2018 C ONSTITUTIONAL Constitutional Review Advisory Board Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. R Prof. Dr.❏ Arief The Hidayat, Function S.H., of M.S.Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Prof. Dr. Maria ConstitutionalFarida Indrati, Court S.H., M.H. EVIEW Dr. H. Wahiduddin Simon ButtAdams, S.H., MA. Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum ❏ Filling the Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System: Dr. Suhartoyo,Constitutional S. H. , M.Courts H. and the Review of Regulations Dr. Manahan M.in P. aSitompul, Split Jurisdiction S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr. SaldiTim Lindsey Isra, S.H., MPA. Prof. Dr. M.❏ Guntur Proportionality Hamzah, TestS.H., in M.H. the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Kasianur Sidauruk,Hizbut Tahrir S.H., Freedom M.H. of Assembly Dr. Wiryanto, Giri Ahmad S.H., TaufikM.Hum. ❏ Volume 4, Number 1 Volume Mainstreaming Human Rights in the Asian Judiciary Desi Hanara ❏ Revisiting Liberal Democracy and Asian Values in Contemporary Indonesia Muhammad Bahrul Ulum and Nilna Aliyan Hamida ❏ The Obligation of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia to Give Consideration in the Process of Dissolution ❏ of Societal Organizations May 2018 Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh PUBLISHED BY CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND CASE ANALYSIS AND LIBRARY MANAGEMENT THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTTHE REPUBLIC OF OF THE INDONESIA REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Constitutional Review, Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTEditorial OF Team THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 Editor-in-Chief Pan Mohamad Faiz Managing Editors Bisariyadi CONTENTS The Function of Judicial Dissent LuthfiSitiin RosmalinaIndonesia’s Widagdo Nurhayati Eddyono Constitutional Court Oly Viana Agustine Editorial Board Simon Butt ........ 001-026 Prof. Dr. Byun Hae-Cheol Filling the Hole in Indonesia’sHankuk Constitutional University of Foreign System: Studies Constitutional Courts and the Review of RegulationsProf. Dr. H.R.B.M in (Henk) a Split Kummeling Jurisdiction Utrecht University School of Law Prof. Dr. I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniTim Lindsey ........ 027-044 Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret Proportionality Test in the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Hizbut Tahrir Prof. Simon Butt, Ph.D. Freedom of Assembly Sydney Law School, the University of Sydney Prof. Yuzuru Shimada,Giri Ph.D. Ahmad Taufik ........ 045-076 DICOS, Nagoya University Mainstreaming Human Rights inDhiana the AsianPuspitawati, Judiciary Ph.D. Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya Lalu Muhammad Hayyan Ul Haq, Ph.D.Desi Hanara ........ 077-110 Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram Revisiting Liberal DemocracyMohamad and Asian Mova Values Al’afghani, in Ph.D.Contemporary Indonesia Faculty of Law, Universitas Ibnu Khaldun Dr. Heribertus Jaka Triyana Muhammad BahrulFaculty Ulumof Law, Universitasand Nilna Gadjah Aliyan Mada Hamida ........ 111-130 Dr. Matthias Hartwig The ObligationMax of Planck the InstituteConstitutional for Comparative Court Public of Law Indonesia and International to Give Law Consideration in the Process of Dissolution of Societal Organizations Dr. Michael Vagias The Hague University, the Netherlands Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh ........ 131-156 Publisher’s Address Biography Center for Research and Case Analysis and Library Management The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Name Index Subject Index Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta 10110 Author Guidelines Phone. (+6221) 23529000 Fax. (+6221) 352177 E-mail: [email protected] This journalCitation can be is downloadedpermitted with on http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/ acknowledgement of the source The articles in this journal do not represent the opinion of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Advisory Board Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H., M.H. Prof. Dr. Aswanto S.H., M.Si. DFM. Prof. Dr. Arief Hidayat, S.H., M.S. Prof. Dr. Maria Farida Indrati, S.H., M.H. Dr. H. Wahiduddin Adams, S.H., MA. Dr. I Dewa Gede Palguna, S.H. , M. Hum Dr. Suhartoyo, S. H. , M. H. Dr. Manahan M. P. Sitompul, S.H., M. Hum Prof. Dr. Saldi Isra, S.H., MPA. Prof. Dr. M. Guntur Hamzah, S.H., M.H. Kasianur Sidauruk, S.H., M.H. Dr. Wiryanto, S.H., M.Hum. TEH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 CONTENTS The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Simon Butt ........ 001-026 Filling the Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System: Constitutional Courts and the Review of Regulations in a Split Jurisdiction Tim Lindsey ........ 027-044 Proportionality Test in the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Hizbut Tahrir Freedom of Assembly Giri Ahmad Taufik ........ 045-076 Mainstreaming Human Rights in the Asian Judiciary Desi Hanara ........ 077-110 Revisiting Liberal Democracy and Asian Values in Contemporary Indonesia Muhammad Bahrul Ulum and Nilna Aliyan Hamida ........ 111-130 The Obligation of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia to Give Consideration in the Process of Dissolution of Societal Organizations Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh ........ 131-156 Biography Name Index Subject Index Author Guidelines Note From Editors Note From Editors Constitutional Review (CONSREV) Journal is an international law journal published by Center for Research and Case Analysis and Library Management of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The fundamental aim of this journal is to disseminate research, conceptual analysis, and other writings which focus on constitutional issues. Articles published by CONSREV cover various topics on constitution, constitutional courts, constitutional courts decisions and issues on constitutional law in any country. In this first edition of Year 2018, six articles are presented by legal and constitutional scholars from various universities. The first article is written by Simon Butt. The author tries to identify the function of judicial dissent in the Indonesia’s Constitutional Court. The explanation of the article is preceded by providing literature related to the judicial dissent. Then, the author shows some weaknesses and followed by ways how the Court employs dissents. The second article written by Tim Lindsey discusses the Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and the review of regulation in a split jurisdiction. He argues that the Court should follow the Korean Constitutional Court to prevent the possibility of constitutionalism being subverted by unconstitutional subordinate regulations. Note From Editors The next author is Giri Ahmad Taufik. He provides an article about the dissolution of one of societal organizations in Indonesia, namely Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). The explanation of the topic uses a proportionality test in interpreting the limitation clause and applies it to the questions of HTI and broader issues to evaluate recent moves of Indonesian government in amending the Law Number 17 Year 2013 on Societal Organization. The following article is written by Desi Hanara. The focus of her article is about human rights in the Asian judiciary. She proposes that any court’s consideration should encourage judicial independence, recommend human rights incorporation into judicial discussions and decisions, suggest the establishment of a platform to enhance human rights expertise of the judiciary, and provide a platform for the development of binding human rights instruments and the establishment of an Asian Human Rights Court. The fifth article focuses on liberal democracy and Asian values in contemporary Indonesia written by Muhammad Bahrul Ulum and Nilna Aliyan Hamida. The authors examined the complex and contentious relationship between constitutionalism and integralism in the Indonesian government including the criticism of democratization within the contemporary state. In the end of the article, it is proposed that the adoption of human rights and liberal democracy by Indonesian government is often challenged by the spirit of integralism. The last article is written by Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh. He suggests that the Indonesia’s Constitutional Court should be given an additional authority to give a consideration during the dissolution process of societal organization by the government. He argues that the Court as a neutral judicial institution should have the authority to consider whether a societal organization should be dissolved. Finally, the editors expect that this issue might give some new insight, judgement, and understanding on constitutions, constitutional court decisions, and constitutional issues in broader nature to our readers. Editors iv Constitutional Review, May 2018, Volume 4, Number 1 Abstract The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Simon Butt Constitutional Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, May 2018, pp. 001-026 Indonesian judges are permitted to issue dissenting opinions. Constitutional Court judges regularly hand them down. However, neither judges nor academics have outlined the purposes of dissenting opinions in Indonesia. This article aims to promote discussion about what these purposes are, or should be, in Indonesia, with a view to increasing the utility of dissents. It begins by considering the international scholarly literature details some purposes recognised in other countries, such as increased transparency and accountability, but also some disadvantages, such as the perceived weakness of a divided court. It then considers how the Constitutional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK PARAHYANGAN FAKULTAS HUKUM Terakreditasi Berdasarkan Keputusan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi No
    UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK PARAHYANGAN FAKULTAS HUKUM Terakreditasi Berdasarkan Keputusan Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Nomor : 429/SK/BAN-PT/Akred/S/XI/2014 “TATA CARA PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN YANG MERDEKA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO.48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN” OLEH FRIDA KHAERANI NPM : 2011 200 136 PEMBIMBING Dr. W. M. Herry Susilowati, S.H., M.Hum Penulisan Hukum Disusun Sebagai Salah Satu Kelengkapan Untuk Menyelesaikan Program Pendidikan Sarjana Program Studi Ilmu Hukum 2017 i Disetujui Untuk Diajukan Dalam Sidang Ujian Penulisan Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Pembimbing DR. W. M. Herry Susilowati, S.H., M.Hum. ·./) ~ PERNYATAAN INTEGRITAS AKADEMIK Dalam rangka mewujudkan nilai-nilai ideal dan standar mutu akademik yang setinggi-tingginya, maka saya, Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahyangan yang bertandatangan di bawah ini : Nama : Frida Khaerani No. Pokok : 2011 200 136 Dengan ini menyatakan dengan penuh kejujuran dan dengan kesungguhan hati dan pikiran, bahwa karya ilmiah/karya penulisan hukum yang berjudul : “TATA CARA PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN YANG MERDEKA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO.48 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN” Adalah sungguh-sungguh merupakan karya ilmiah/karya Penulisan Hukum yang telah saya susun dan selesaikan atas dasar upaya, kemampuan, dan pengetahuan akademik saya pribadi, dan sekurang- kurangnya tidak dibuat melalui dan atau mengandung hasil dari tindakan-tindakan
    [Show full text]
  • Mekanisme Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi
    Mekanisme Pengangkatan Hakim Konstitusi Bagus Joko Puruitomo Fitra Arsil Ilmu Hukum Fakultas hukum Universitas Indonesia [email protected] Abstrak Pada tahun 2013, terdapat sebuah kasus mengenai mekanisme pengangkatan hakim konstitusi oleh Presiden. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa peraturan perundang-undangan yang paling sesuai dengan Pasal 24C UUD 1945, serta mekanisme pengangkatan hakim konstitusi yang secara praktik dapat diterapkan di Indonesia. Metode yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi pustaka yang dilengkapi dengan wawancara terhadap narasumber. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, dapat diketahui bahwa peraturan perundang-undangan yang sesuai dengan Pasal 24C UUD 1945 adalah UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 dan UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2011. Sifat transparan dan partisipatif juga sangat menentukan mekanisme pengangkatan hakim konstitusi yang diterima di masyarakat Indonesia. Kata kunci: mekanisme; pengangkatan; hakim konstitusi; transparan; partisipatif. Abstract In 2013, there is a case regarding the constitutional judges appointing mechanism by the President of Indonesia. This research is focused on analyzing the regulations according to Article 24C Constitution of Indonesia, and the most applicable mechanism on appointing a constitutional judge. The method that is used for this research are literature studies and interview with the informants. Through this research, it can be ascertained that regulations according to Article 24C Constitution of Indonesia are Law Number 24 Year 2003 and Law Number 8 Year 2011. Transparancy and
    [Show full text]
  • Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 42/Puu-Xii/2014
    MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA --------------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 42/PUU-XII/2014 PERIHAL PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 ACARA MENDENGARKAN KETERANGAN AHLI/SAKSI DARI PEMOHON (IV) J A K A R T A SELASA, 30 SEPTEMBER 2014 MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA -------------- RISALAH SIDANG PERKARA NOMOR 42/PUU-XII/2014 PERIHAL Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum [Pasal 1 angka 10] terhadap Undang- Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 PEMOHON 1. Soedarno 2. Zulhasril Nasir 3. Soetopo Ronodiharjo, dkk. ACARA Mendengarkan Keterangan Ahli/Saksi dari Pemohon (IV) Selasa, 30 September 2014, Pukul 11.13 – 11.38 WIB Ruang Sidang Panel Gedung Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta Pusat SUSUNAN PERSIDANGAN 1) Hamdan Zoelva (Ketua) 2) Maria Farida Indrati (Anggota) 3) Patrialis Akbar (Anggota) 4) Wahiduddin Adams (Anggota) 5) Aswanto (Anggota) Saiful Anwar Panitera Pengganti i Pihak yang Hadir: A. Pemohon: 1. Soetopo Ronodiharjo 2. Zulhasril Nasir 3. Benggol Martonohadi 4. Pekik Denjatmiko 5. Hidayat B. Saksi dari Pemohon: 1. Syamsuddin Slamet C. Pemerintah: 1. Nasrudin 2. Rulita 3. Triyono 4. Aslan Noor 5. Bugi Riyanto ii SIDANG DIBUKA PUKUL 11.13 WIB 1. KETUA: HAMDAN ZOELVA Sidang Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perkara Nomor 42/PUU- XII/2014 dibuka dinyatakan terbuka untuk umum. KETUK PALU 3X Pemohon hadir, ya? Hadir. Dari Pemerintah, hadir? Hadir. DPR? Tidak hadir. Sebelum sidang dilanjutkan saya perlu menyampaikan hari ini hanya dihadiri oleh 5 Hakim, satu hakim sedang melaksanakan Ibadah Haji, satu hakim sedang bertugas di luar negeri, satu hakim hari ini sakit, satu hakim sebelumnya memang izin suatu acara yang tidak bisa ditinggalkan.
    [Show full text]
  • IJCS 2 No2 2009
    The Face of Law Supremacy: A Media Content Analysis on Artalyta’s Luxurious Prison Case on The Jakarta Globe Newspaper Rino Febri STIKOM the London School of Public Relations-Jakarta Ariesa Lie A professional Abstract This research looks at the potrayal of the Indonesian government, particularly the law en- forcement institution that was responsible for the luxurious prison case of Artalyta and some other wealthy inmates. This issue came to surface when a sudden inspection was conducted by a newly established Judicial Mafia Eradication Task Force on Sunday, 10 January 2010 at Pondok Bambu Penitentiary. The discovery of the inspection was actually no big sudden as it has become a public secret. However, it still disgraced the image of the government since the media blew this issue up and eventually gained public’s attention. This research used a quantitative media content analysis method. This method used numbers as the basis of data interpretation and elaboration to the rel- evant theories. Precisely 53% of the total articles written contained unfavorable impressions of the Indonesian government. Government’s dishonest and corrupt were impressions appeared in the news. Nonetheless, some articles appeared favorable toward the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights as a result of strict action taken against corrupted officials. Introduction sudden inspection to a women’s penitentiary in Life in a jail has always been projected Pondok Bambu, East Jakarta. as a nightmare by common people and mass The task force discovered Artalyta, the media. The smell, the dirt and even the room- convict of the bribery to Urip Tri Gunawan case, mates are always told to be awful.
    [Show full text]
  • Upaya Memulihkan Kewibawaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Tertangkapnya Akil Mochtar
    Tundjung HS. Upaya Memulihkan... 293 Upaya Memulihkan Kewibawaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Tertangkapnya Akil Mochtar Tundjung Herning Sitabuana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Semarang Jl. Arteri Soekarno-Hatta Semarang Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara Jl. Letjen S. Parman No. 1 Jakarta Barat [email protected] Abstract This research was to study and find an attempt to recover the authority of Constitutional Court after the apprehension of Akil Mochtar. The method used in this research was normatif legal research which was descriptive qualitative with statute approach. The secondary data were primary and secondary legal materials which were collected by literature study and analyzed normatively and qualitatively. The research result showed that the recovery of the authority of Constitutional Court must be conducted in a correct way, namely by using 1945 Constitution of Republic Indonesia as the guideline in order to ensure the implementation of the norms contained in 1945 Constitution as the standard. This was in accordance with the principle of constitution supremacy applied in Indonesia. Key words : Constitutional Court. principle of constitution supremacy Abstrak Penelitian Penelitian yang bertujuan mengkaji dan menemukan upaya untuk memulihkan kewibawaan Mahkamah Konstitusi pasca tertangkapnya Akil Mochtar. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan perundang- undangan. Data sekunder yang berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka, dan dianalisis secara normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemulihan kewibawaan Mahkamah Konstitusi harus dilakukan dengan cara yang tepat, yaitu dengan menggunakan UUD NRI Tahun 1945 sebagai panduannya, sehingga tolok ukur yang dipakai adalah norma-norma yang ada di dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • KETETAPAN Nomor 70/PUU-XI/2013 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN
    KETETAPAN Nomor 70/PUU-XI/2013 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA, Menimbang : a. bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi telah mencatat dalam Buku Registrasi Perkara Konstitusi, permohonan dari: 1. Nama : Ishak Malak Pekerjaan : Pegawai Negeri Sipil Jabatan : Ketua Lembaga Masyarakat Adat Malamoi Distrik Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong Selanjutnya disebut sebagai ----------------------- Pemohon I; 2. Nama : Aristoteles Bisulu Pekerjaan : Wiraswasta Jabatan : Wakil Sekretaris Lembaga Masyarakat Adat Malamoi Distrik Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong Selanjutnya disebut sebagai ---------------------- Pemohon II; 3. Nama : Halim Warwey Pekerjaan : Wiraswasta Jabatan : Tokoh Pemuda Islam Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong Selanjutnya disebut sebagai --------------------- Pemohon III; 4. Nama : Arius Paa Pekerjaan : Wiraswasta Jabatan : Tokoh Pemuda Kristen Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong 2 Selanjutnya disebut sebagai --------------------- Pemohon IV; 5. Nama : Hj. Hawa Sangaji Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga Jabatan : Tokoh Perempuan Muslim Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong Selanjutnya disebut sebagai ---------------------- Pemohon V; 6. Nama : Maria Malak Pekerjaan : Ibu Rumah Tangga Jabatan : Tokoh Perempuan Kristen Moraid Alamat : Kampung Mega Distrik Moraid Kabupaten Sorong Selanjutnya disebut sebagai --------------------- Pemohon VI; 7. Nama : Zakues Suu Pekerjaan
    [Show full text]
  • PUTUSAN Nomor 05-14-22/PHPU-DPR-DPRD/XII/2014 (Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan)
    PUTUSAN Nomor 05-14-22/PHPU-DPR-DPRD/XII/2014 (Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan) DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA, [1.1] Yang mengadili perkara konstitusi pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir, menjatuhkan putusan dalam perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Tahun 2014, yang diajukan oleh: [1.2] Partai Bulan Bintang (PBB) yang diwakili oleh: 1. Nama : Dr. M.S. Kaban, S.E., M.Si.; Jabatan : Ketua Umum DPP Partai Bulan Bintang; Alamat : Jalan Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 18 Nomor 1B Jakarta Selatan; 2. Nama : BM. Wibowo, S.E., M.M.; Jabatan : Sekretaris Umum DPP Partai Bulan Bintang; Alamat : Jalan Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 18 Nomor 1B Jakarta Selatan. Berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus Nomor B-1220/DPP-Sek/07/1435 bertanggal 12 Mei 2014 memberikan kuasa kepada Abdurrahman Tardjo, S.H., Panhar Makawi, S.H., M.H., Drs. Baginda Siregar, S.H., Samsudin, S.H., Damrah Mamang, S.H., M.H., Edigius NS. Sadipun, S.H., Kornerlis K. Saran, S.H., Mahfudin, S.H., dan M. Yasin, S.H. adalah Tim Kuasa Hukum Partai Bulan Bintang beralamat di Jl. Raya Pasar Minggu Km. 18 Nomor 1B, Jakarta Selatan, baik sendiri-sendiri maupun bersama-sama bertindak untuk dan atas nama Pemberi Kuasa Partai Bulan Bintang peserta Pemilu Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Tahun 2014 dengan Nomor Urut 14 (empat belas). Selanjutnya disebut sebagai …………….................................................... Pemohon; Salinan putusan ini tidak untuk dan tidak dapat dipergunakan sebagai rujukan resmi atau alat bukti. Untuk informasi lebih lanjut, hubungi Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jl.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes / Stefanus Hendrianto
    “With rare exceptions, such as the courts headed by John Marshall and Earl Warren, it was not common until recently to explain the work-product of consti- tutional courts by focusing on their leadership. Now, however, a number of writ- ers have begun to emphasize the importance of the chief justice in guiding courts to be bold or cautious, expansive or restrictive, in their constitutional decisions. With his extensive knowledge and with great judiciousness, Stefanus Hendrianto has examined the important role of chief justices of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. He shows convincingly that leadership can indeed make a major dif- ference in the emergence of constitutional doctrine, as he examines the work of the Court and compares it to similar courts elsewhere. This is an important work of comparative constitutional law and politics that will repay careful study.” Donald L. Horowitz, Duke University, USA and author of Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia “This book is a major contribution to comparative constitutional studies. It pro- vides a crisp and authoritative account of the early jurisprudence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court, a highly active and creative court operating in one of the world’s largest democracies. It also offers a fascinating account of the role of Chief Justice Jimly Asshiddiqie as the leader of that court, and in doing so makes an important contribution to broader debates about the role of constitutional judges—and different styles of constitutional judging—in the consolidation of constitutional democracy.” Rosalind Dixon, UNSW Sydney, Australia “This fascinating study of the Indonesian Constitutional Court introduces an entirely new concept for understanding judicial power: the judge as a heroic figure.
    [Show full text]
  • KETETAPAN Nomor 103/PUU-XIII/2015
    SALINAN KETETAPAN Nomor 103/PUU-XIII/2015 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA Menimbang : a. bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi telah menerima permohonan bertanggal 11 Agustus 2015 dari Imran, S.H dan H. Muklisin, S.Pd dalam hal ini berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus, bertanggal 4 Agustus 2015, memberi kuasa kepada M. Husni Chandra, S.H., M.Hum., Moh. Irson, S.H., Herdian Asmi, S.H., M. Jayanto, S.H., Firman Raharja, S.H., David Afrizal, S.H., Mujaddid Islam, S.H., Aprili Firdaus Sakamta, S.H., M.H., Djarot Indra Kurnia, S.H dan telah dicatat dalam Buku Registrasi Perkara Konstitusi dengan Nomor 103/PUU-XIII/2015 pada tanggal 26 Agustus 2015, perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945; b. bahwa terhadap Perkara dengan registrasi Nomor 103/PUU- XIII/2015 tersebut, Mahkamah Konstitusi telah menerbitkan: 1. Ketetapan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 215/TAP. MK/2015 tentang Pembentukan Panel Hakim Untuk Memeriksa Permohonan Nomor 103/PUU-XIII/2015, bertanggal 26 Agustus 2015; 2. Ketetapan Ketua Panel Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 216/TAP.MK/2015 tentang Penetapan Hari Sidang Pertama untuk Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan, bertanggal 1 September 2015; c. bahwa terhadap Perkara tersebut, Mahkamah Konstitusi telah menyelenggarakan sidang pemeriksaan pendahuluan pada Untuk mendapatkan salinan resmi, hubungi Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Merdeka Barat No.6, Jakarta 10110, Telp. (021) 23529000, Fax (021) 3520177, Email: [email protected] 2 tanggal 8 September 2015 dan sidang perbaikan permohonan pada tanggal 21 September 2015; d.
    [Show full text]
  • 36/Puu-Xvi/2018
    PUTUSAN Nomor 36/PUU-XVI/2018 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA [1.1] Yang mengadili perkara konstitusi pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir, menjatuhkan putusan dalam perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, yang diajukan oleh: 1. Nama : Muhammad Hafidz Pekerjaan : Pegawai Swasta Alamat : Jalan Tatya Wuni IV, Blok F5 Nomor 2, RT.007 RW.012, Kelurahan Cijujung, Kecamatan Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor Sebagai -------------------------------------------------------------------- Pemohon I; 2. Nama : Dewan Pimpinan Pusat Federasi Serikat Pekerja Singaperbangsa, diwakili oleh Agus Humaedi Abdillah selaku Ketua Umum Alamat : Ruko Buana Tamansari Nomor B003, Margasari, Kecamatan Karawang Timur, Kabupaten Karawang Sebagai ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pemohon II; 3. Nama : Perkumpulan Rakyat Proletar untuk Konstitusi, diwakili oleh Abda Khair Mufti selaku Ketua Alamat : Ruko Sentra Niaga Pinus Blok A5, Jalan Alternatif Sentul, Kandang Roda, Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor Sebagai ------------------------------------------------------------------ Pemohon III; Dalam hal ini berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus masing-masing bertanggal 15 Mei 2018 memberi kuasa kepada Dorel Almir, S.H., M.H., Julherfi, S.H., Abdulah, S.H., Kemala Dewi Mirza Andalusia, S.H., M.H., Iman Nul Islam, S.H., M.H., 2 Eep Ependi, S.H., Makrifat Putra Koto, S.H., dan Sayidatul Mardiyah, Advokat dan Para
    [Show full text]
  • Making Presidentialism Work: Legislative and Executive Interaction in Indonesian Democracy
    Making Presidentialism Work: Legislative and Executive Interaction in Indonesian Democracy Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Djayadi Hanan, M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: R. William Liddle, Adviser Richard Paul Gunther Goldie Ann Shabad Copyright by Djayadi Hanan 2012 i Abstract This study explores the phenomenon of executive – legislative relations in a new multiparty presidential system. It seeks to understand why, contrary to arguments regarding the dysfunctionality of multi-party presidential systems, Indonesia’s governmental system appears to work reasonably well. Using institutionalism as the main body of theory, in this study I argue that the combination of formal and informal institutions that structure the relationship between the president and the legislature offsets the potential of deadlock and makes the relationship work. The existence of a coalition-minded president, coupled with the tendency to accommodative and consensual behavior on the part of political elites, also contributes to the positive outcome. This study joins the latest studies on multiparty presidentialism in the last two decades, particularly in Latin America, which argue that this type of presidential system can be a successful form of governance. It contributes to several parts of the debate on presidential system scholarship. First, by deploying Weaver and Rockman’s concept of the three tiers of governmental institutions, this study points to the importance of looking more comprehensively at not only the basic institutional design of presidentialism (such as dual legitimacy and rigidity), but also the institutions below the regime level which usually regulate directly the daily practice of legislative – executive relations such as the legislative organizations and the decision making process of the legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia's Constitutional Court
    Constitutional Review, Volume 4, Number 1, May 2018 P-ISSN: 2460-0016 (print), E-ISSN: 2548-3870 (online) https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev411 The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Simon Butt Sydney Law School [email protected] Abstract Indonesian judges are permitted to issue dissenting opinions. Constitutional Court judges regularly hand them down. However, neither judges nor academics have outlined the purposes of dissenting opinions in Indonesia. This article aims to promote discussion about what these purposes are, or should be, in Indonesia, with a view to increasing the utility of dissents. It begins by considering the international scholarly literature details some purposes recognised in other countries, such as increased transparency and accountability, but also some disadvantages, such as the perceived weakness of a divided court. It then considers how the Constitutional employs dissents, before exploring some of the uncertainties and unanswered questions about dissents and their use in Indonesia. Keywords: Constitutional Court, Indonesia, Judicial Dissent I. INTRODUCTION The judgments of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court often contain ‘dissenting opinions’ (pendapat berbeda). In them, one of more judges writes reasons indicating why they would have decided the case differently to the way a majority of the Court decided it. However, there is, to my knowledge, no consensus amongst Indonesian judges and academics about the significance and purpose of dissents. In one sense, this is unsurprising: publishing dissenting opinions alongside majority or other opinions in a single judgement document have long been a feature of the common law tradition. Yet Indonesia is a civil law country.
    [Show full text]