GIORGIO AGAMBEN, JM COETZEE, and KAZUO ISHIGURO a Dissertati
THE DISCOURSE OF HUMAN DIGNITY AND TECHNIQUES OF DISEMPOWERMENT: GIORGIO AGAMBEN, J. M. COETZEE, AND KAZUO ISHIGURO A Dissertation by MALEK HARDAN MOHAMMAD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2010 Major Subject: English The Discourse of Human Dignity and Techniques of Disempowerment: Giorgio Agamben, J. M. Coetzee, and Kazuo Ishiguro Copyright 2010 Malek Hardan Mohammad THE DISCOURSE OF HUMAN DIGNITY AND TECHNIQUES OF DISEMPOWERMENT: GIORGIO AGAMBEN, J. M. COETZEE, AND KAZUO ISHIGURO A Dissertation by MALEK HARDAN MOHAMMAD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, David McWhirter Committee Members, Marian Eide Katherine Kelly Stjepan Mestrovic Head of Department, Jimmie Killingsworth December 2010 Major Subject: English iii ABSTRACT The Discourse of Human Dignity and Techniques of Disempowerment: Giorgio Agamben, J. M. Coetzee, and Kazuo Ishiguro. (December 2010) Malek Hardan Mohammad, B.A, University of Aleppo; M.A., Angelo State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. David McWhirter A multidisciplinary approach is needed to critique the frequently invoked but seldom questioned notion of ―human dignity,‖ a discursive tool that is subtly serving abusive power structures while seemingly promoting human rights. The discourse of human dignity misrepresents the meaning of empowerment for modern citizens, making them interested more in political gestures and less in profit, comfort and protection from abuse. Dignity‘s epistemes— self-assertion, recognition, political action, public-spiritedness, responsibility, resistance, the denial of animal instinct, sacrifice—should not be human ideals, for they are exactly the opposite of the sovereign‘s characteristics and because they are responsible for recursive violence that preserves the status quo.
[Show full text]