FROM SKOPJE to GENEVA Dimitar Shalev Defender of Minorities in the League of Nations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FROM SKOPJE to GENEVA Dimitar Shalev Defender of Minorities in the League of Nations FROM SKOPJE TO GENEVA Dimitar Shalev Defender of Minorities in the League of Nations • Logis • Sofia 2013 1 Contents Preface, Dimitar Mitev 5 Introduction, Dimitar Mitev 8 Dimitar Shalev: Memories of the Trial in Skopie in 1927 52 In memoriam Dimitar Shalev by his son, Ivan Shalev 75 © Dimitar Mitev, compiler, introduction © Ivan Shalev, biographical essay © Zheko Alexiev artist of the cover © Mariela Boycheva, translation 2 3 Preface Dimitar Shalev was an outstanding champion of the civil rights of Bulgarians in Macedonia in a tragic period: Serbian domination of Vardar Macedonia in the 1920s and 1930s. Like the lives of most of his associates, who took part in the Bulgarian national liberation movement after World War I, Shalev’s journey through life was marked by the dramatic and tragic events typical of the time. His name, like the names of thousands of others, has sunk in oblivi- ousness. The collecting and publishing of the documentary herit- age of Dimitar Shalev is a step towards the vindication of his per- sonality and the rescuing of his name from undeserved oblivion. The book you are holding in your hands came to light thanks to the exceptional merit of his grandson, who bears the same name: Dimitar Shalev. He provided the family archive and financed the issuing of the present Collection. This act was followed by an- other decision, duty-bound to the family and national memory: the documentary heritage of Dimitar Shalev shall be delivered for storage and reference by the Central State Archive of the Republic of Bulgaria in Sofia. It is the documents from his private archive that formed the basis of this Collection. The documentary part of the publication is enriched with other, no less valuable testi- monies held in the Central State Archive in Sofia; the Archive of Yugoslavia in Belgrade; the Archives of the British Foreign Office in London; the Archives of the League of Nations in Geneva. We owe a great thank you to all the above mentioned institutions. The documents in English were translated by me and those in French – by Dr. Tzvetana Micheva of the Institute of Historical Research at the Bulgarian Academy of Science. The biographical essay on Dimitar Shalev was written by his son, Ivan Shalev. Dimitar Shalev wrote mostly in Bulgarian, but there are historical 4 5 documents in French, as well. Those written in Bulgarian impress ther estrangement or tragic life. Dimitar Shalev chose the latter. with the literary language knowledge of the author – flawless and His life was endless persecution. He was born and grew up in expressive. In most cases, the same refers to texts written by Sha- Macedonia under Turkish rule. Later he was persecuted by the lev’s associates, the activists of the Internal Macedonian Revolu- Serbian authorities, including the time when he was in Geneva tionary Organization (IMRO) and various immigrant organiza- (1930-1934). He was looked upon with suspicion by his own kind, tions, Bulgarian politicians and diplomats of the time. as well. IMRO leaders and Ivan Mihaylov personally can hardly The text of the published documents is authentic with rare excep- be called his well-wishers. After the coup of 19 May 1934 he came tions where the spelling is updated. For the sake of convenience home to Bulgaria, but here he fell under the blows of power, as each document is accompanied by a brief summary written by the IMRO and Macedonian immigrants were already on the list of the complier, indicating what the text is about, where it is stored and ‘unwelcome’. The last years of his life were the most tragic. The what the language of the original is. persecutions that he had been through during the Communist Dimitar Shalev is not only a prominent member of the Bulgar- regime were so severe that they eventually caused his untimely ian national liberation movement after World War I, but also one death. of the most worthy petitioners of Macedonia under Serbian rule. The attitude of the Bulgarian state towards Dimitar Shalev makes He could easily be perceived as typical and at the same time out- me write these lines with great sorrow and pain, firstly as a Bul- standing representative of the Bulgarian elite of Vardar Macedo- garian and secondly as a historian. Nevertheless, I still cherish nia in the years between the two world wars. A well-educated and the hope that we, Bulgarians, will manage to overcome our pas- highly skilled lawyer, wealthy and of high social status, Dimitar sions and emotions and like the civilized people we are, will hum- Shalev reached the post of Vice-Mayor of Skopje. bly learn the lessons of our own history as a commitment to our He represented that segment of the Bulgarian intellectual elite shared national tragedy, not as an inexhaustible source of feuds. I who chose not to immigrate to Bulgaria but to remain in their sincerely believe that the publishing of the present Collection will native land. These were people who had no alternative but to help at least partially to rescue Dimitar Shalev from the oblivion accept the harsh reality of Serbian power in Vardar Macedonia. in which he was buried after his death. Any contact the reader Their immediate aspirations were mostly related to the recogni- makes with a document written by Shalev or related to his strug- tion and security of the Bulgarians remaining within the Serbo- gle for the freedom of his country, Macedonia, means touching the Croatian-Slovene Kingdom – provision of decent life, achievement memory of and opening a ‘new page of life’ for this praiseworthy of national, civil and political rights, improvement of economic Bulgarian enlightener. and social position. In their value system legitimate acts outweigh revolutionary actions. Dimitar Mitev Dimitar Shalev’s fate and the collapse of his legitimate struggle for the rights of the Bulgarian minority within the boundaries of royal Yugoslavia is clear evidence of the hopeless situation these people found themselves in. Such hopelessness predetermines ei- 6 7 force remained Britain. Moreover, it was forced to fight desperately Shalev – Introduction from its island, for no other reason but for its own survival. Among the ugliest creatures conceived by ‘the Paris peacemak- Well-known are the prophetic words that Marshal Ferdinand ers’ in 1919 was the state of Yugoslavia, which until 1929 had the Foch said about the peace treaties, which in 1919 put an end to strange name Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Due to ad hoc World War I: “This is not peace. It is an armistice for twenty years.” coincidental circumstances the Balkan Kingdom of Serbia was turned Marshal Foch was one of the legendary generals during the war, into a leading regional military and political factor, in a kind of tiny commanding the united forces of the Entente on the Western Front, Balkan empire. Croats, Slovenes, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Germans, who found himself in the role of ‘the prophet of evil’. Twenty years Albanians, Muslims and many other nations fell under the power of later, on the 1 September 1939 World War II began. Belgrade. Dictatorship was to be the main political model of govern- The thesis that the seeds of World War II were rooted in the ance in this country over the next 70 years. Whenever possible, it was terms of the peace treaties of 1919 is widely known and extremely to break into its constituent parts: once – temporarily – during World resistant. The majority of researchers accept it unreservedly. All War II and again – finally – after the Cold War. this serves to suggest that it is correct. It is within the boundaries of this country that Dimitar Sha- World War I radically altered the political map of Europe and lev’s native land fell. Vardar Macedonia was annexed to Serbia after the Middle East. Three great empires were destroyed: the Russian, the defeat of Bulgaria in the Second Balkan War in 1913, and this the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman. Although it ultimately sur- position was strengthened by the Neuilly Peace Treaty of 1919. For vived, Germany also suffered very serious blows. Borders in Cen- the Bulgarian population in Vardar Macedonia the Exarchate times tral, Eastern and Southeastern Europe were radically reshaped. New until 1913 began to look like ‘a bright dream’. The new Serbian countries emerged: Poland, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia. Oth- government prohibited and destroyed Bulgarian schools, Bulgarian ers, such as Romania and Serbia (turned into the Kingdom of Serbs, churches, Bulgarian literature and culture. Belgrade started a proc- Croats and Slovenians) were altered and enlarged beyond recog- ess of ruthless denationalization and conversion of the Bulgarians nition. After the war, the European continent, especially its central in Vardar Macedonia. The area was called ‘Southern Serbia’; the and eastern parts remained fragmented, bankrupt and doomed to population was declared ‘Southern Serbs’, with surnames ending political, economic and social upheavals. The numerous borders and in ‘-ich’; an unscrupulous dictatorship was established. The entire customs barriers hampered the economic recovery and subsequent arsenal of familiar practices of denationalization and assimilation development of the region. The reparation payments worsened the was used starting with the settlement of representatives of the dom- already unfavourable economic conditions and further decapitalized inant nationality, the so called ‘Serbian colonists’. The local intellec- the economies of the defeated countries. Eventually, all that could tual, religious and economic elite were driven into exile. People were lead Europe to nothing else but endless political crises and social up- forced to change their names, the use of Bulgarian language was heavals. And that was just what European nations witnessed over the forbidden, Bulgarian books were destroyed.
Recommended publications
  • The Diary of Bogdan Filov Bogdan Dimitrov Filov
    DOCUMENTS FREDERICK B. CHARY, translator and editor (Gary, Ind., U.S.A.) The Diary of Bogdan Filov Bogdan Dimitrov Filov (1883-1945) was prime minister of Bulgaria from 1940 to 1943 and a member of the regency couiicil from September, 1943 to September 9, 1944. One of the most important political leaders of the Kingdom of Bulgaria during the critical years of World War II, he wrote a diary of day-to-day events of that time which has great value for the historian. In it are revealed both the stresses of Balkan politics and the views of Axis leaders and their allies on the war. Before entering upon his political career, Filov was an art historian and an archaeologist. He was at one time a rector of Sofia University and president of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. His scholarly works were so numerous and impressive that even today they form a major contribution to the study of Bulgarian antiquities and medieval art. Filov first entered the Bulgarian government in November, 1938, as minister of education. Although he was a Germanophile (he had attended German universities and belonged to several German scholarly societies), his minor post and academic background kept him from the center of political controversy in 1939. At that time a power struggle between Georgi K'oseivanov, the prime minister, and Ivan Bagrianov, the minister of agriculture in the 1938-1939 cabinet, occupied Bulgarian politics. King Boris III had hand-picked K'oseivanov for the premiership in 1935, after the struggles following the Military League's coup d'etat of the previous year had brought the state under the domination of the throne.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again?
    Southeast European Politics Vol. IV, No. 2-3 November 2003 pp. 157-174 Will Bulgaria Become Monarchy Again? ROSSEN VASSILEV The Ohio State University ABSTRACT This article deals with the much debated question of whether post-Communist Bulgaria should restore the monarchy abolished by the 1946 referendum. The prospects for bringing back the monarchy are believed to be negligible, given the existing constitutional hurdles and the population’s pro-republican sentiments. But ex-King Simeon’s triumph in the June 2001 parliamentary election has dramatically changed his standing at home. Any restoration of the monarchy will depend on the perceived success of his coalition government, especially in rebuilding the ailing national economy. It is questionable whether Simeon II will be able to live up to the overoptimistic expectations of Bulgarians who believe that like a Messiah he will save their country from the economic, social, political and institutional turmoil into which it has descended. But with a population distrustful of the politically bankrupt old parties and politicians and despondent enough to grasp at straws, a revival of the monarchy cannot be ruled out. Introduction Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan consider the issue of constitutions and constitutional formulas to be a significant, if neglected, aspect of democratic transitions (Linz and Stepan 1996: 81-83). They offer a classification of six different possible constitution-making environments, ranging from those that present the most confining conditions for democratization to those
    [Show full text]
  • When Fear Is Substituted for Reason: European and Western Government Policies Regarding National Security 1789-1919
    WHEN FEAR IS SUBSTITUTED FOR REASON: EUROPEAN AND WESTERN GOVERNMENT POLICIES REGARDING NATIONAL SECURITY 1789-1919 Norma Lisa Flores A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2012 Committee: Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Dr. Mark Simon Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Michael Brooks Dr. Geoff Howes Dr. Michael Jakobson © 2012 Norma Lisa Flores All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Beth Griech-Polelle, Advisor Although the twentieth century is perceived as the era of international wars and revolutions, the basis of these proceedings are actually rooted in the events of the nineteenth century. When anything that challenged the authority of the state – concepts based on enlightenment, immigration, or socialism – were deemed to be a threat to the status quo and immediately eliminated by way of legal restrictions. Once the façade of the Old World was completely severed following the Great War, nations in Europe and throughout the West started to revive various nineteenth century laws in an attempt to suppress the outbreak of radicalism that preceded the 1919 revolutions. What this dissertation offers is an extended understanding of how nineteenth century government policies toward radicalism fostered an environment of increased national security during Germany’s 1919 Spartacist Uprising and the 1919/1920 Palmer Raids in the United States. Using the French Revolution as a starting point, this study allows the reader the opportunity to put events like the 1848 revolutions, the rise of the First and Second Internationals, political fallouts, nineteenth century imperialism, nativism, Social Darwinism, and movements for self-government into a broader historical context.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Bulgaria, October 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: BULGARIA October 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Bulgaria (Republika Bŭlgariya). Short Form: Bulgaria. Term for Citizens(s): Bulgarian(s). Capital: Sofia. Click to Enlarge Image Other Major Cities (in order of population): Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, Ruse, Stara Zagora, Pleven, and Sliven. Independence: Bulgaria recognizes its independence day as September 22, 1908, when the Kingdom of Bulgaria declared its independence from the Ottoman Empire. Public Holidays: Bulgaria celebrates the following national holidays: New Year’s (January 1); National Day (March 3); Orthodox Easter (variable date in April or early May); Labor Day (May 1); St. George’s Day or Army Day (May 6); Education Day (May 24); Unification Day (September 6); Independence Day (September 22); Leaders of the Bulgarian Revival Day (November 1); and Christmas (December 24–26). Flag: The flag of Bulgaria has three equal horizontal stripes of white (top), green, and red. Click to Enlarge Image HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early Settlement and Empire: According to archaeologists, present-day Bulgaria first attracted human settlement as early as the Neolithic Age, about 5000 B.C. The first known civilization in the region was that of the Thracians, whose culture reached a peak in the sixth century B.C. Because of disunity, in the ensuing centuries Thracian territory was occupied successively by the Greeks, Persians, Macedonians, and Romans. A Thracian kingdom still existed under the Roman Empire until the first century A.D., when Thrace was incorporated into the empire, and Serditsa was established as a trading center on the site of the modern Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • AFFAIRE RELATIVE a L'incident AÉRIEN DU 27 JUILLET 1955 (ISRAËL C
    COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRETS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE RELATIVE A L'INCIDENT AÉRIEN DU 27 JUILLET 1955 (ISRAËL c. BULGARIE) EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES ARR~TDU 26 MAI 1959 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF JULY 27th, 1955 (ISRAEL v. BULGARIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS JUDGMENT OF MAY 26th, 1959 Le présent arrêt doit être cité comme suit: (( Agaire relative à l'incident aérien du 27 juillet I955 (Israël c. Bulgarie), Exceptions préliminaires, Arrêt dzt 26 mai 19-59 : C. I. J. Recueil 1959, p. 127. 1) This Judgment should be cited as follows: "Case concerning the Aerial Incident of Jzdy 27th, 1955 (Israel v. Bulgaria) , P~eliminaryObjections, Jzsdgnzent of May 26th, I959: I.C. J. Reports I959, p. 127." No de vente: Sales number 206 / INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 1959 May 26th General List : No. 35 YEAR 1959 May 26th, 1959 CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF (ISRAEL v. BULGARIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Com~ulsoryjurisdiction of International Court of Justice.-Declara- tions accepting compulsory jurisdiction of Permanent Court of Inter- national Justice.-Article 36, paragraph 5, of Statute of Court.- Determination of States to which Article 36, paragraph 5, app1ies.- Conditions required for application of Article 36, paragraph 5.-Lapse of a declaration following dissolution of Permanent Court. JUDGMENT Present : President KLAESTAD; Vice-President ZAFRULLAKHAN ; Judges BASDEVANT,HACKWORTH, WINIARSKI, BADAWI, ARMAND-UGON,KO JEVNIKOV, Sir Hersch LAUTERPACHT, MORENOQUINTANA, CORDOVA, WELLINGTON KOO, SPIRO- POULOS,Sir Percy SPENDER;Judges ad hoc GOITEINand ZOUREK;Deputy-Registrar GARNIER-COIGNET. In the case conceming the Aerial Incident of July 27th, 1955, between the State of Israel, represented by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • English and INTRODACTION
    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • During the Second World War
    DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR _______________StK______________ SK MARSHALL LEE MILLER Stanford University Press STANFORD, CALIFORNIA I 975 Stanford University Press Stanford, California © 1975 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University Printed in the United States of America is b n 0-8047-0870-3 LC 74-82778 To my grandparents Lee and Edith Rankin and Evelyn Miller Preface SOS h e p o l it ic a l history of modern Bulgaria has been greatly ne­ T glected by Western scholars, and the important period of the Second World War has hardly been studied at all. The main reason for this has no doubt been the difficulty of obtaining documentary material on the wartime period. Although the Communist regime of Bulgaria has published a large number of books and monographs dealing with the country’s role in the war, these works have been concerned mostly with magnifying the importance of the Bulgarian Communist Party (BKP) and the partisan struggle. Despite this bias, useful information can be found in these works when other sources are available to provide perspective and verification. Within recent years, German, American, British, and other diplo­ matic and intelligence reports from the wartime years have become available, and the easing of travel restrictions in Bulgaria has facili­ tated research there. As recently as 1958, when the doctoral thesis of Marin V. Pundeff was presented (“Bulgaria’s Place in Axis Policy, 1936-1944”), there was very little material on the period after June 1941. It is now possible to fill in many of the important gaps in our knowledge of Bulgaria during the entire war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • LARSON-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf
    THE NEW “OLD COUNTRY” THE KINGDOM OF YUGOSLAVIA AND THE CREATION OF A YUGOSLAV DIASPORA 1914-1951 BY ETHAN LARSON DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2020 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Maria Todorova, Chair Professor Peter Fritzsche Professor Diane Koenker Professor Ulf Brunnbauer, University of Regensburg ABSTRACT This dissertation reviews the Kingdom of Yugoslavia’s attempt to instill “Yugoslav” national consciousness in its overseas population of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, as well as resistance to that same project, collectively referred to as a “Yugoslav diaspora.” Diaspora is treated as constructed phenomenon based on a transnational network between individuals and organizations, both emigrant and otherwise. In examining Yugoslav overseas nation-building, this dissertation is interested in the mechanics of diasporic networks—what catalyzes their formation, what are the roles of international organizations, and how are they influenced by the political context in the host country. The life of Louis Adamic, who was a central figure within this emerging network, provides a framework for this monograph, which begins with his arrival in the United States in 1914 and ends with his death in 1951. Each chapter spans roughly five to ten years. Chapter One (1914-1924) deals with the initial encounter between Yugoslav diplomats and emigrants. Chapter Two (1924-1929) covers the beginnings of Yugoslav overseas nation-building. Chapter Three (1929-1934) covers Yugoslavia’s shift into a royal dictatorship and the corresponding effect on its emigration policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Embajada De España En Bulgaria 1 2 3 Tras Los Pasos De Un Diplomático Español En Sofia: Julio Palencia
    EN BULGARIA EN AÑA ESP DE DA JA BA EM EMBAJADA DE ESPAÑA EN BULGARIA 1 2 3 TRAS LOS PASOS DE UN DIPLOMÁTICO ESPAÑOL EN SOFIA: JULIO PALENCIA. UNA RUTA DE LOS LUGARES Y MEMORIA DE LAS RELACIONES DIPLOMÁTICAS ENTRE ESPAÑA Y BULGARIA. A lo largo de esta ruta visitaremos lugares vinculados a la historia de las relaciones diplomáticas entre España y Bulgaria, desde que estas se iniciaron en el año 1910. Podremos El 8 de mayo de 2020 se cumplieron 110 años del establecimiento de relaciones ver los diferentes edificios donde se han ubicado las oficinas de la Embajada de España, diplomáticas entre España y Bulgaria. En la ceremonia de entrega de cartas credenciales ligados a los diplomáticos españoles destinados en Sofía en el transcurso de los años. Entre del primer Embajador de España en Sofía, el Zar Fernando I de Bulgaria declaró que estaba ellos, se rinde homenaje al que da nombre a esta ruta, Julio Palencia y Álvarez-Tubau, por “deseoso de que las relaciones cordiales que felizmente existían entre las dos Penínsulas su labor en favor y defensa de la comunidad sefardita entre 1940 y 1943. que cerraban Europa fueran cada vez más íntimas y extensas”. El deseo del Zar se ha Este recorrido peatonal transcurre por el centro de Sofía, donde nos detendremos ante convertido en realidad y más de 100 años jalonan unas excelentes relaciones entre ambos algunos de los edificios y monumentos más emblemáticos de la arquitectura de la ciudad, países y, lo que es más importante, entre ambas sociedades, ya que uno de los pilares de tal como aparecen marcados en el mapa que acompaña a esta guía.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrobiodiversity-Study-Macedonia
    Agrobiodiversity in Southeast Europe - Assessment and Policy Recommendations COUNTRY REPORT - MACEDONA AGROBIODIVERSITY IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE - ASSESSMENT AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Rural development through Integrated Forest and Water Resources Management in Southeast Europe (LEIWW) Antonie Grubisic 5, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia Regional Rural Development Standing Working Group in SEE (SWG) Blvd. Goce Delcev 18, MRTV Building, 12th Floor, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia The analyses, conclusions and recommendations in this paper represent the opinion of the authors and are not necessarily representative of the position of the Regional Rural Development Standing Working Group in SEE (SWG) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Authors: Ms. Sonja Ivanovska, PhD; Mr. Sreten Andonov, PhD Edited by: Ms. Irena Djimrevska, PhD; Mr. Hugo Rivera, PhD; Mr. Helmut Gaugitsch, PhD; Mr. Andreas Bartel, PhD; Mr. Stefan Schindler, PhD Language proofreading: Mr. Jason Brown and Ms. Jana Vasilevska Design: Mr. Filip Filipovic Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the National and University Library “St. Clement of Ohrid” – Macedonia CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 338.43(497.7)(047) IVANOVSKA, Sonja Agrobiodiversity in Southeast Europe - assessment and policy recommendations - country report Macedonia
    [Show full text]