DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual-Review-2019-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual-Review-2019-2020 Annual Review 2019 | 2020 Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk CONTENTS Chair’s Report 1 Relationships 3 Research 4 Events 5 Personnel 7 Organisation 9 APPENDICES R1 Highlighted Papers 11 R2 Complete List of Papers 15 E1 Heilbronn Events 28 E2 Sponsored Events 33 E3 Focused Research Events 43 E4 Future Events 50 P1 Fellows Joining since September 2019 59 P2 Fellows Leaving since September 2019 62 P3 Fellows Moving with Extensions 64 P4 Fellows Joining in October 2020 65 M1 Career Development 68 Chair’s Report The Heilbronn Institute has, notwithstanding the challenges of the pandemic, enjoyed a remarkable and successful year as a national institute for mathematical research. It is commonly said that mathematicians need only pen, paper, and an internet connection to do their work. The pandemic has put the members of HIMR to the test, and the scientific outcomes have been very strong, achieved sometimes in difficult conditions. The external events and activities of HIMR have continued whenever possible, and the Institute’s mathematical output has been distinguished by its impact and breadth. This has been a big year for the Heilbronn Institute—our first complete year in an extensive suite of rooms within the newly renovated Fry Building of Bristol University, in cohabitation with the School of Mathematics; a change of leadership on both internal and external work; and then the challenges posed across the UK by the restricted working and living conditions of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Members of the Institute have responded bravely and constructively to the ensuing changes in their environments, and HIMR is strengthened by a deepened feeling of shared commitment to excellence in mathematics. Our new accommodation in Bristol allows our organizational staff, for the first time, room to breathe. The hospitality of the University and School is gratefully acknowledged in this regard. We hope to be able to welcome all HIMR members on visits to Bristol in the near future. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|1 The changes in leadership mark a progression for HIMR. Jon Keating’s successful and dynamic tenure as Chair has seen the evolution of its external activities into a mature operation that looks both within, to its Fellows and Students, and outwith, across the entirety of the UK mathematics community. The new Heilbronn Doctoral Partnership has accepted its first intake of 9 students, and our eyes are turning towards other cohorts of mathematicians including those studying at schools and on undergraduate courses. In addition, Daniel Shiu has retired from the Headship of HIMR after four successful years in post. We are especially concerned with issues around diversity. Our recent successes in hiring women to fellowships and studentships have been substantial, and our efforts will be intensified. The Heilbronn Doctoral Partnership aids our potential to attract women into the academic system who may not otherwise present themselves. While women are under‐ represented in mathematical research, the situation with other under‐represented groups is more extreme, and we will support initiatives across the UK that tend towards increasing diversity in mathematical science. A major event of our year is the January appointment process. We made 14 appointments this year (including 3 women) to Heilbronn Research Fellowships (HRF). Since September 2019, 9 former Fellows have left HIMR, 8 for academic positions and 1 for industry. Details may be found in Appendix P2. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|2 Relationships HIMR works closely with other major UK and international mathematics research institutes and organisations, including the American Institute of Mathematics, the Alan Turing Institute, the Clay Mathematics Institute, the International Centre for Mathematical Sciences, the Isaac Newton Institute, and the London Mathematical Society. We continue to run workshops with the Alan Turing Institute and to provide support for workshops at the ICMS in Edinburgh and the Isaac Newton Institute in Cambridge. Last year we entered into partnership with the Clay Mathematics Institute to establish a major new series of Postgraduate Summer Schools. Within this partnership, we provide support for two UK participants on the PROMYS Europe programme for highly gifted pre‐ university mathematicians. HIMR plays a leading role in the ‘STEM for Britain’ poster competition and exhibition that aims to encourage, support and promote Britain’s early‐career researchers in Mathematics in Parliament and elsewhere. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|3 Research One of the primary aims of the Heilbronn Institute is to support the external research of its members by providing a stimulating environment offering opportunities for collaboration and personal development. We attract excellent mathematicians and support them in carrying out excellent research. A natural measure of the Institute’s performance in relation to this goal is the quality of the papers produced by its members. In October 2020, members of the Institute submitted reports (37 in all) on their external research. They were invited to list papers produced in the twelve‐month period from October 2019, to identify which of these papers they considered their best, giving reasons for their choice, and to list papers appearing in print during this period. The papers identified by members as their best are listed in Appendix R1, and the complete set of papers may be found in Appendix R2. HIMR’s publications find homes in mathematical journals including many of the highest ranked. Mention is made of two papers, in algebra and dynamical systems respectively, written by current fellows that have appeared recently in Inventiones Mathematicae. Classified work at HIMR is proving a rich and popular source of high‐quality impact cases for submission to the 2020 Research Excellence Framework. There are about 18 HIMR cases under consideration for 12 UK universities. COVID‐19 has inspired members of HIMR to harness their science to good cause. They participated in a COVID working group hosted by the Isaac Newton Institute, and contributed to modelling for the Cabinet Office. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|4 Events A series of research events is offered throughout the year under the auspices of the Heilbronn Institute. These include the two‐day Annual Conference and several workshops, meetings and working groups. These events are of a high quality, and attract leading mathematicians from around the world. They contribute significantly to the research environment and reputation of the Institute. The regular Heilbronn Colloquia were a lively source of inspiration and discussion, until their forced postponement from around mid‐March. A series of frequent events in Data Science took place between October 2019 and March 2020, namely 7 seminars and a workshop on hypocoercivity. Mention is made of the one‐day meeting in February in memory of Elmer Rees, Founding Director of HIMR. Elmer was a leading individual in geometry and topology, who spent much of his career in Oxford and Edinburgh before moving to Bristol. He was greatly respected and loved by those close to him, and his friends enjoyed his company and his unpretentious sense of humour. Sadly, all events scheduled for mid‐March and later had to be postponed, including Amie Wilkinson’s planned Distinguished Lecture Series. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|5 HIMR has entered into an agreement with the Clay Mathematics Institute to jointly sponsor a series of Postgraduate Summer Schools. The first of these took place last year in Bristol in the area of computational number theory and this year’s summer school took place online in July, on the topic of integrable probability. The third (on hyperbolic geometry/dynamics) is planned for two weeks in Bristol during June/July 2021. Our 2020 flagship event was the Annual Conference, which took place remotely from 10–11 September. We were grateful to our eight speakers for their willingness to move their lectures online. Stimulating talks were given by Maria Chudnovsky (Princeton), Adam Harper (Warwick), Özlem Imamoglu (ETH Zurich), Kurt Johansson (KTH Royal Institute of Technology), Ailsa Keating (Cambridge), Hendrik Lenstra (Universiteit Leiden), Ulrike Tillmann (Oxford), and Ronald de Wolf (CWI & Universiteit van Amsterdam). When the questions dried up after Hendrik Lenstra’s closing lecture, he embarked upon his own quiz of the audience. The Institute is proud to have been able to offer part funding for a large number of significant scientific events held across the UK. Details may be found in Appendix E2. A distinctive element of HIMR’s research profile is its programme on Focused Research Events, of which we funded 14 during the year. Of these, 3 took place between October 2019 and January 2020 and 11 have been postponed until next year due to the COVID‐19 pandemic restrictions. These events, which are listed in Appendix E3, enable groups of researchers and students to gather and discuss topical problems in mathematics. The competition for funds is fairly fierce and HIMR was able to fund only about one half of the deserving applications that it received this year. Annual Review | October 2019 – September 2020 Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research www.heilbronn.ac.uk Page|6 Personnel Jon Keating resigned as Chair from 31 July 2020, following his 2019 election to the Sedleian Professorship of Natural Philosophy at Oxford University. He was succeeded on 1 September by the incoming Chair, Geoffrey Grimmett, Professor Emeritus of Mathematical Statistics at Cambridge University. Jon was instrumental in bringing HIMR to Bristol in 2005, and has been a guiding influence in the development of the now mature Institute.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prvních Deset Abelových Cen Za Matematiku
    Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku The first ten Abel Prizes for mathematics [English summary] In: Michal Křížek (author); Lawrence Somer (author); Martin Markl (author); Oldřich Kowalski (author); Pavel Pudlák (author); Ivo Vrkoč (author); Hana Bílková (other): Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku. (English). Praha: Jednota českých matematiků a fyziků, 2013. pp. 87–88. Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/402234 Terms of use: © M. Křížek © L. Somer © M. Markl © O. Kowalski © P. Pudlák © I. Vrkoč Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use. This document has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library http://dml.cz Summary The First Ten Abel Prizes for Mathematics Michal Křížek, Lawrence Somer, Martin Markl, Oldřich Kowalski, Pavel Pudlák, Ivo Vrkoč The Abel Prize for mathematics is an international prize presented by the King of Norway for outstanding results in mathematics. It is named after the Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abel (1802–1829) who found that there is no explicit formula for the roots of a general polynomial of degree five. The financial support of the Abel Prize is comparable with the Nobel Prize, i.e., about one million American dollars. Niels Henrik Abel (1802–1829) M. Křížek a kol.: Prvních deset Abelových cen za matematiku, JČMF, Praha, 2013 87 Already in 1899, another famous Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie proposed to establish an Abel Prize, when he learned that Alfred Nobel would not include a prize in mathematics among his five proposed Nobel Prizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Getting a Knighthood
    Getting a knighthood (Bristol, June 1996) It's unreal, isn't it? I've always had a strong sense of the ridiculous, of the absurd, and this is working overtime now. Many of you must have been thinking, ‘Why Berry?’ Well, since I am the least knightly person I know, I have been asking the same question, and although I haven't come up with an answer I can offer a few thoughts. How does a scientist get this sort of national recognition? One way is to do something useful to the nation, that everyone agrees is important to the national well- being or even survival. Our home-grown example is of course Sir Charles Frank's war work. Or, one can sacrifice several years of one's life doing high-level scientific administration, not always received with gratitude by the scientific hoi polloi but important to the smooth running of the enterprise. Sir John Kingman is in this category. Another way – at least according to vulgar mythology – is to have the right family background. Well, my father drove a cab in London and my mother ruined her eyes as a dressmaker. Another way is to win the Nobel Prize or one of the other huge awards like the Wolf or King Faisal prizes, like Sir George Porter as he then was, or Sir Michael Atiyah. The principle here I suppose is, to those that have, more shall be given. I don't qualify on any of these grounds. The nearest I come is to have have won an fairly large number of smaller awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadenza Document
    2017/18 Whole Group Timetable Semester 1 Mathematics Module CMIS Room Class Event ID Code Module Title Event Type Day Start Finish Weeks Lecturer Room Name Code Capacity Size 3184417 ADM003 Yr 1 Basic Skills Test Test Thu 09:00 10:00 18-20 Tonks, A Dr Fielding Johnson South Wing FJ SW 485 185 Basement Peter Williams PW Lecture Theatre 3198490 ADM003 Yr 1 Basic Skills Test Test Thu 09:00 10:00 18-20 Leschke K Dr KE 323, 185 KE 101, ADR 227, MSB G62, KE 103 3203305 ADM003 Yr 1 Basic Skills Test Test Thu 09:00 10:00 18-20 Hall E J C Dr Attenborough Basement ATT LT1 204 185 Lecture Theatre 1 3216616 ADM005 Yr 2 Basic Skills Test Test Fri 10:00 11:00 18 Brilliantov N BEN 149 Professor F75b, MSB G62, KE 103, KE 323 2893091 MA1012 Calculus & Analysis 1 Lecture Mon 11:00 12:00 11-16, Tonks, A Dr Ken Edwards First Floor KE LT1 249 185 18-21 Lecture Theatre 1 2893092 MA1012 Calculus & Analysis 1 Lecture Tue 11:00 12:00 11-16, Tonks, A Dr Attenborough Basement ATT LT1 204 185 18-21 Lecture Theatre 1 2893129 MA1061 Probability Lecture Thu 10:00 11:00 11-16, Hall E J C Dr Ken Edwards First Floor KE LT1 249 185 18-21 Lecture Theatre 1 2893133 MA1061 Probability Lecture Fri 11:00 12:00 11-16, Hall E J C Dr Bennett Upper Ground Floor BEN LT1 244 185 18-21 Lecture Theatre 1 2902659 MA1104 ELEMENTS OF NUMBER Lecture Tue 13:00 14:00 11-16, Goedecke J Ken Edwards Ground Floor KE LT3 150 100 THEORY 18-21 Lecture Theatre 3 2902658 MA1104 ELEMENTS OF NUMBER Lecture Wed 10:00 11:00 11-16, Goedecke J Astley Clarke Ground Floor AC LT 110 100 THEORY 18-21 Lecture
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams
    Twenty Female Mathematicians Hollis Williams Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Alba Carballo González for support and encouragement. 1 Table of Contents Sofia Kovalevskaya ................................................................................................................................. 4 Emmy Noether ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Mary Cartwright ................................................................................................................................... 26 Julia Robinson ....................................................................................................................................... 36 Olga Ladyzhenskaya ............................................................................................................................. 46 Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat ....................................................................................................................... 56 Olga Oleinik .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Charlotte Fischer .................................................................................................................................. 77 Karen Uhlenbeck .................................................................................................................................. 87 Krystyna Kuperberg .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LMS – EPSRC Durham Symposium
    LMS – EPSRC Durham Symposium Anthony Byrne Grants and Membership Administrator 12th July 2016, Durham The work of the LMS for mathematics The charitable aims of the Society: Funding the advancement of mathematical knowledge Encouraging mathematical research and collaboration ’, George Legendre Celebrating mathematical 30 Pieces achievements Publishing and disseminating mathematical knowledge Advancing and promoting mathematics The attendees of the Young Researchers in Mathematics Conference 2015, held at Oxford Historical Moments of the London Mathematical Society 1865 Foundation of LMS at University College London George Campbell De Morgan organised the first meeting, and his father, Augustus De Morgan became the 1st President 1865 First minute book list of the 27 original members 1866 LMS moves to Old Burlington House, Piccadilly J.J. Sylvester, 2nd President of the Society. 1866 Julius Plûcker Thomas Hirst Plûcker Collection of boxwood models of quartic surfaces given to Thomas Archer Hirst, Vice- President of LMS, and donated to the Society 1870 Move to Asiatic Society, 22 Albemarle Street William Spottiswoode, President 1874 Donation of £1,000 from John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh) Generous donation enabled the Society to publish volumes of the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. J.W. Strutt (Lord Rayleigh), LMS President 1876-78 1881 First women members Charlotte Angas Scott and Christine Ladd 1884 First De Morgan medal awarded to Arthur Cayley 1885 Sophie Bryant First woman to have a paper published in LMS Proceedings 1916 Return to Burlington House the home of LMS until 1998 1937 ACE ’s Automatic Turing LMS Proceedings, 1937 Computing Engine, published Alan Turing’s first paper 1950 On Computable Numbers 1947 Death of G.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Banknote Character Advisory Committee Minutes
    BANKNOTE CHARACTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE (1) MINUTES Bank of England, Threadneedle Street 13.45 ‐ 15.00: 14 March 2018 Advisory Committee Members: Ben Broadbent (Chair), Sir David Cannadine, Victoria Cleland, Sandy Nairne, Baroness Lola Young Also present: Head of Banknote Resilience Programme Manager, Banknote Transformation Programme Senior Manager, Banknote Development Secretary to the Committee Minutes 1 Introduction and background 1.1 The Chair welcomed the Committee. He reminded members that their discussions should remain confidential. 1.2 Following the successful launch of the £5 and £10, the Bank was considering plans to launch a polymer £50. Governors and Court had approved a polymer £50 and the Banknote Character Advisory Committee had been re‐convened. 1.3 The Chair advised that the Chancellor’s Spring Statement the previous day had announced a call for evidence relating to the future of cash. The results of this exercise could impact the future of the £50 and it would be inappropriate for the Bank to press forward with a polymer £50 while the Government was considering the future denominational mix. 1.4 The closing date for receipt of evidence is 5 June and a decision might be expected around the Autumn budget. If HM Treasury decided to continue with the denomination and the Bank chose to develop a polymer £50, the Bank could presumptively make an announcement in early 2019 to avoid the public nomination process spanning Christmas 2018. 1 2 Equality considerations for selecting the field 2.1 The Bank reminded the Committee that equality considerations need to be consciously considered during the character selection process.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Panel B
    MAIN PANEL B Sub-panel 7: Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences Sub-panel 8: Chemistry Sub-panel 9: Physics Sub-panel 10: Mathematical Sciences Sub-panel 11: Computer Science and Informatics Sub-panel 12: Engineering Where required, specialist advisers have been appointed to the REF sub-panels to provide advice to the REF sub-panels on outputs in languages other than English, and / or English-language outputs in specialist areas, that the panel is otherwise unable to assess. This may include outputs containing a substantial amount of code, notation or technical terminology analogous to another language In addition to these appointments, specialist advisers will be appointed for the assessment of classified case studies and are not included in the list of appointments. Main Panel B Main Panel B Chair Professor David Price University College London Deputy Chair Professor Dame Muffy Calder* University of Glasgow Members Professor Mike Ashfold University of Bristol Professor John Clarkson University of Cambridge Dr Peter Costigan Independent Professor Paula Eerola University of Helsinki Professor Alison Etheridge University of Oxford Dr Giles Graham Defence Science Technology Laboratory Professor Michael Hinton High Value Manufacturing Catapult Professor Andrew Holmes University of Melbourne Professor Raymond Jeanloz University of California, Berkeley Mr Ben Johnson Graphic Science Ltd Professor Hilary Lappin-Scott Cardiff University Professor John Ludden Heriot-Watt University Professor Miles Padgett University of Glasgow Professor Simon
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017-2018
    Annual Review 2017 | 2018 ONTENTS C 1 Overview 1 2 Profile 4 3 Research 6 4 Events 9 5 Personnel 13 6 Mentoring 17 7 Structures 18 APPENDICES R1 Highlighted Papers 20 R2 Complete List of Papers 23 E1 HIMR-run Events 29 E2 HIMR-sponsored Events 31 E3 Focused Research Events 39 E4 Future Events 54 P1 Fellows Joining in 2017|2018 59 P2 Fellows Leaving since September 2017 60 P3 Fellows Moving with 3-year Extensions 62 P4 Future Fellows 63 M1 Mentoring Programme 64 1. Overview This has been another excellent year for the Heilbronn Institute, which is now firmly established as a major national mathematical research centre. HIMR has developed a strong brand and is increasingly influential in the UK mathematics community. There is currently an outstanding cohort of Heilbronn Research Fellows doing first-rate research. Recruitment of new Fellows has been most encouraging, as is the fact that many distinguished academic mathematicians continue to work with the Institute. The research culture at HIMR is excellent. Members have expressed a high level of satisfaction. This is especially the case with the Fellows, many of whom have chosen to continue their relationships with the Institute. Our new Fellows come from leading mathematics departments and have excellent academic credentials. Those who left have moved to high-profile groups, including several to permanent academic positions. We currently have 29 Fellows, hosted by 6 universities. We are encouraged by the fact that of the 9 Fellows joining us this year, 5 are women. The achievements of our Fellows this year again range from winning prestigious prizes to publishing in the elite mathematical journals and organising major mathematical meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2008
    THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER No. 374 October 2008 Society THE PROPOSAL FOR A NEW SOCIETY Meetings In all likelihood you will now have present form fulfil many of the and Events received a copy of the proposal hopes and expectations of their for a new society, combining the members, times are changing and 2008 present London Mathematical the need for mathematics as a uni- Friday 21 November Society and Institute of Mathe- fied activity to hold and defend AGM, London matics and its Applications. For its position in the public sphere [page 3] a new society to be formed, the grows constantly greater. IMA and the LMS must both vote As the Presidents’ letter which 12–13 December separately in favour of the accompanies the report makes Joint Meeting with proposal. clear, there is a pressing need to the Edinburgh There has been debate about engage effectively with govern- Mathematical Society this for several years but mem- ment, with external bodies, with Edinburgh [page 7] bers could be forgiven for think- the media and with the public. ing that, despite progress reports A society that represents the 2009 appearing in Mathematics Today broad spectrum of the mathemat- Friday 27 February and the Newsletter, things had ical community and has a larger Mary Cartwright ‘gone quiet’. The process leading membership must inevitably carry Lecture, London up to the present proposal has greater weight. been protracted not because the Your view is important and you 31 March – 4 April two societies disagree with one will soon have an opportunity to LMS Invited Lectures another, which they do not, but take part in this important deci- Edinburgh because those developing the new sion.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Issue: 481 - March 2019
    i “NLMS_481” — 2019/2/13 — 11:04 — page 1 — #1 i i i NEWSLETTER Issue: 481 - March 2019 HILBERT’S FRACTALS CHANGING SIXTH AND A-LEVEL PROBLEM GEOMETRY STANDARDS i i i i i “NLMS_481” — 2019/2/13 — 11:04 — page 2 — #2 i i i EDITOR-IN-CHIEF COPYRIGHT NOTICE Iain Moatt (Royal Holloway, University of London) News items and notices in the Newsletter may [email protected] be freely used elsewhere unless otherwise stated, although attribution is requested when reproducing whole articles. Contributions to EDITORIAL BOARD the Newsletter are made under a non-exclusive June Barrow-Green (Open University) licence; please contact the author or photog- Tomasz Brzezinski (Swansea University) rapher for the rights to reproduce. The LMS Lucia Di Vizio (CNRS) cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy of Jonathan Fraser (University of St Andrews) information in the Newsletter. Views expressed Jelena Grbic´ (University of Southampton) do not necessarily represent the views or policy Thomas Hudson (University of Warwick) of the Editorial Team or London Mathematical Stephen Huggett (University of Plymouth) Society. Adam Johansen (University of Warwick) Bill Lionheart (University of Manchester) ISSN: 2516-3841 (Print) Mark McCartney (Ulster University) ISSN: 2516-385X (Online) Kitty Meeks (University of Glasgow) DOI: 10.1112/NLMS Vicky Neale (University of Oxford) Susan Oakes (London Mathematical Society) David Singerman (University of Southampton) Andrew Wade (Durham University) NEWSLETTER WEBSITE The Newsletter is freely available electronically Early Career Content Editor: Vicky Neale at lms.ac.uk/publications/lms-newsletter. News Editor: Susan Oakes Reviews Editor: Mark McCartney MEMBERSHIP CORRESPONDENTS AND STAFF Joining the LMS is a straightforward process.
    [Show full text]
  • XXXX LEVER JAN15 NEWSLTTR.Indd 1 28/01/2015 11:34 DIRECTOR’S NOTE FUNDING UPDATES COMPETITIONS SCHEME NEWS OLD and NEW
    SCHOLARSHIPS FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION JANUARY 2015 ROUND MOUNDS Were they really built by Normans? INSIDE THIS ISSUE The ‘me’ in memory Exploring the developing self The American steppe Russian influences on the Great Plains GEMOLOGY NANOSYNTHESIS New materials, new worlds Jewellers, travellers and the A new method of nanostructure Understanding the uses of Bronze Age axes science of gems in France in fi lms XXXX LEVER JAN15 NEWSLTTR.indd 1 28/01/2015 11:34 DIRECTOR’S NOTE FUNDING UPDATES COMPETITIONS SCHEME NEWS OLD AND NEW Award winners in no fewer than seven and the latest round produced over LEVERHULME RESEARCH funding streams are announced in this 750 applications, so we were very CENTRES edition of the Newsletter. pleased to be able to make 100 awards. We congratulate the recipients of Competition to secure one of these The Leverhulme Trust has announced our new Leverhulme Doctoral Scholarship Fellowships is obviously fierce – so many the launch of a major new initiative to Awards. Fourteen universities will each congratulations to those who succeeded establish Leverhulme Research Centres receive £1 million, over three years, to in this particular round. in the UK, representing a commitment provide 15 scholarships per institution For the first time, our popular of up to £10 million over 10 years for to address topics as diverse as Artist in Residence Grants were made each Centre. The objective is to fund understanding maritime futures, climate via the competitive mechanism of a innovative research of the greatest justice, genetics journeys into history and single ‘gathered field’. Over 100 bids originality and to encourage bold, mathematics for a sustainable society.
    [Show full text]