Adirondack Park Agency Letterhead
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2 Boxes ACCESS: Open to Research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo
Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve UC0055 1 of 1 Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve 1966-1976 UC0055 QUANTITY: 2 boxes ACCESS: Open to research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo Biographical Note: The Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve formed in January 1966 as a coalition to be prepared challenges to Article XIV at the New York State Constitutional Convention. It was designed to serve as a liaison at the time of the Convention and in May 1968 elected to continue serving to alert organizations state-wide to a variety of concerns that related to the problems of the Forest Preserve. When the coalition was founded, officers from over fifty organizations joined along with the individual memberships were issued. Proposed changes to the constitution were bundled and voted on as a whole and rejected by every New York county. The CCFP continued to function as a group seeking to maintain Forest Preserve protection within the state constitution. As of January 1971, the Council consisted of 138 members. The officers included David Newhouse (who would also become an advisor to the TSCFA), David Sive, Arthur M. Crocker, R. Watson Pomeroy and William K. Verner. The consortium was dissolved in 1976 because as David Newhouse, CCFP Chairman, writes, “its function is now fulfilled by other organizations such as EPL and The Adirondack Council.” Any remaining funds were transferred to the Adirondack Council. Scope and Content Note: This Collection includes evidence of not only the internal discussion informing the opinions and decisions of this group of environmentalist leaders but letters and statements from members to political leaders. -
Northwest Foothills of the Adirondack Park
New York State Route 3 Olympic Trail Scenic Byway A VISITOR’S GUIDE Find Undiscovered Treasures… Contents 1 Welcome to the Area 10 Hunting CREDITS: This guide is the product of a cooperative effort of the NYS Adirondack Park Agency, the 2 Things To See & Do 11 Fishing Clifton-Fine Economic Development Corporation, 2 Map 12 Snowmobiling and the SUNY-ESF Ranger School. It was made possible by a grant to the Agency from the NYS 4 Camping 13 Cross Country Skiing/ Scenic Byways Program through the Federal Highway Administration and the Transportation Equity Act 5 Hiking/Backpacking Snowshoeing for the 21st Century of 1998, administered by the 6 Bird Watching 14 Waterfalls NYS Department of Transportation. 7 Biking/Mountain Biking, 15 Landmark / Historical Special thanks to Christopher Westbrook, Jamie Golf and Tennis 15 Scenic Drives Savage, Rick Kovacs, Bernie Siskavitch, Peter O’Shea, Wayne Allen and John Sayles for all their work in 8 Boating 16 Ranger School gathering information and images for this guide, 9 Paddling 17 Resources and to Kathi Tevlin of In the Woods Design Studio for design and layout. 9 Swimming Welcome to the Area Welcome to the Northwest Foothills of the Adirondack Park. We are part of a region commonly referred to as the “North Country,” an affectionate term Characterized by a rolling countryside, used to describe both the beauty of our natural resources and the friendly character of the people who make the region their home. Unlike the more a more moderate climate, and developed portions of the Park, here you will find a slower pace coupled uncrowded trails and waterways, the with almost limitless opportunities for outdoor recreation. -
Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J
5 Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J. Kearney, New York state Department of Transportation, Albany The Adirondack Park in upstate New York contains more than 23 000 phasize that aesthetics and engineering are mutually km2 (9000 rniles2) of public and private lands. Most stote·owned land is dependent and that roads can be built that will be designated by the state constitution to remain "forever wild", and de operationally safe and efficient and easier and cheaper velopment of private land is closely controlled by the Adirondack Park to maintain and yet will blend attractively into the sur Agency, which is part of the executive branch of the state government and also has jurisdiction over construction of new municipal roads and rounding landscape. Figures 1 and 2 show examples of expansions of existing ones. Guidelines that have been developed for use good construction practices in the park, a11d Figure 3 in lieu of review of individual local road projects by the Adirondack Park shows an example of what should be avoided. Agency are presented and discussed. The guidelines are presented in Many researchers have questioned the applicability seven categories: (a) planning, (b), alignment, (c) cross section, (d) road of the American Association of state Highway and bed construction, (e) riding surface, (f) bridges and culverts, and (g) gen Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design eral construction. Their objective is to ensure that local roads are con Guide for Local Roads and streets (!) and Highway De structed or reconstructed so that they fit harmoniously into the natural surroundings and impart the feeling of being in a park. -
2010 the Adirondack Park the Adirondack Park Is the Largest Park in the Contiguous Through Public Education and Advocacy for the United States
State of the Park 2010 The Adirondack Park The Adirondack Park is the largest park in the contiguous Through public education and advocacy for the United States. It contains six million acres, covers one- protection of the Park’s ecological integrity and wild fifth of New York State and is equal in size to neighboring character, the Adirondack Council advises public and Vermont. The Adirondack Park is nearly three times the private policy makers on ways to safeguard this last size of Yellowstone National Park. remaining great expanse of open space. More than half of the Adirondack Park is private land, devoted principally to hamlets, forestry, agriculture and open-space recreation. The Park is home for 132,000 permanent and 110,000 seasonal residents, and hosts ten million visitors yearly. The remaining 45 percent of the Park is publicly owned Forest Preserve, protected as “Forever Wild” by the Lake Placid NYS Constitution since 1894. One Tupper Lake million acres of these public lands Elizabethtown are protected as Wilderness, where non-mechanized recreation may be enjoyed. The majority of the public land (more than 1.3 million acres) is Wild Forest, where motorized uses are permitted on designated waters, Indian Lake roads and trails. Old Forge Plants and wildlife abound in the Park. Old growth forests cover more than 100,000 acres of public land. The western and southern Adirondacks are gentle landscapes of Lake George hills, lakes, wetlands, ponds and streams. In the northeast are the High Peaks. Forty- three of them rise above 4,000 feet and 11 have alpine summits that rise above the timberline. -
State of New York Public Service
STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION _________________________________________________________ Application of Upstate NY Power Corp. for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need for a 50.6 mile 230kV Transmission Facility from Galloo Island in the town of Hounsfield, Jefferson County, to the Fitzpatrick-Edic Substation in the Town of Mexico, Oswego County. Case No.: 09-T-0049 _________________________________________________________ PUBLIC HEARING, before Administrative Law Judges Jeffrey E. Stockholm and Kevin J. Casutto, presiding, held on November 16, 2009, at 8939 NYS Route 178, Henderson, New York, commencing at 11:00 a.m., before Terry Clark, Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of New York. PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com 2 1 PUBLIC HEARING 2 PUBLIC HEARING 3 NOVEMBER 16, 2009 4 JUDGE STOCKHOLM: Ladies and 5 gentlemen, if we could come to order, please, 6 we'll begin the public statement comments. 7 What I would ask you is when I call your 8 name to please come up to this microphone in 9 the front. That will greatly assist the 10 stenographer in getting your words down 11 accurately and completely, and we will call 12 these cards in the order that we got them. 13 Are there any questions before we begin? 14 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Do we face 15 you? 16 JUDGE STOCKHOLM: As long as you use 17 the microphone you can face any way you 18 want. However, the comments are referred to 19 us. That's the purpose of the hearing. 20 Okay, let's begin. -
October 16, 2018 VIA E-FILING Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal
October 16, 2018 VIA E-FILING Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Alice Falls Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 5867-053) Supplemental Information to the Pre-Application Document Dear Secretary Bose: Alice Falls Hydro, LLC (Alice Falls Hydro), a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, LLC (Eagle Creek), is the licensee and operator of the Alice Falls Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 5867 (Project), located on the Ausable River in the Hamlet of Keeseville, Clinton and Essex Counties, New York. On September 28,2018, Alice Falls Hydro electronically filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) the Notice of Intent to File a License Application (NOI) and accompanying Pre-Application Document (PAD) for the Project. Subsequent to filing the PAD, Alice Falls Hydro obtained, via a FERC eLibrary request, these additional documents available only on microfilm, which had not been available at the time of the PAD filing. Accordingly, Alice Falls Hydro is filing the following information to update and/or supplement information provided in the PAD, as follows: Attachment A provides the 1993 Exhibit F and replaces the 1992 Exhibit F documents provided in Appendix H (CEII) of the PAD. Attachment A also provides the Single Line Drawing which is the same as that provided in the PAD filing. Attachment B provides the 1993 Exhibit G and replaces the Exhibit G document provided in Appendix E of the PAD. Note the figures in the PAD denote the 1990 Exhibit G Project boundary. These figures will be updated in the draft and final license application filings to denote the 1993 Exhibit G project boundary. -
Hpcandvmwfpubliccomments
This is an example of a mass email letter sent to NYSDEC. Dear Boreal UMP Comments, Thank you for the chance to comment on the High Peaks Wilderness Complex and the Vanderwhacker Mountain Wild Forest Draft Unit Management Plan Amendments. The following are my recommendations to the DEC: (1) The DEC comment period should be 90 days, not 45 days; and the hearings should be scheduled all around the state not just in Albany and Newcomb (on May 23). There are many critical management issues in these areas that require thoughtful review. (2) The parking lot proposed at the end of Gulf Brook Road, at the end of the Wild Forest corridor, 500 feet from Boreas Ponds, should be for disabled access only, through the DEC CP-3 program. The potential for "keg rolls", as occurred at Marcy Dam, is too high to allow general public parking (referred to as "universal access" in the UMP) in this area, which is surrounded by lands and waters which are to be managed as Wilderness. (3) The historic log cabin at 4 Corners should be retained, and maintained, with historic interpretive signage, and also for possible use for DEC forest ranger administrative purposes. The area surrounding the cabin should also be managed with historic interpretive signage reflecting the other structures that were there, and the rich logging history of the area. (4) There should be no parking area created at the 4 Corners. Parking should be limited to the existing lot (referred to as the Fly Brook Lot in the UMP); automobiles and other motorized vehicles should not pass beyond the gate at this lot, except for those with valid CP-3 disabled permits, accompanied by a forest ranger. -
119Opn17-Decision.Pdf
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 119 In the Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. --------------------------------- Stanislaw Faltynowicz, et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- Santiago Alvear, Appellant, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent. --------------------------------- Peter Curley et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent. Andrew W. Amend, for intervenor-appellant. Luke W. Nikas, for appellants Alvear, et al. Daniel S. Connolly, for respondents. FEINMAN, J.: This matter comes to us from an order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certifying the following questions pursuant to Rule 500.27 of this Court: - 1 - - 2 - No. 119 "(1) Before New York State's capacity-to-sue doctrine may be applied to determine whether a State-created public benefit corporation has the capacity to challenge a State statute, must it first be determined whether the public benefit corporation 'should be treated like the State,' [(Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Island R.R. Co., 70 NY2d 382 [1987])], based on a 'particularized inquiry into the nature of the instrumentality and the statute claimed to be applicable to it,' [(John Grace & Co. v State Univ. Constr. Fund, 44 NY2d 84 [1978])], and if so, what considerations are relevant to that inquiry?; and "(2) Does the 'serious injustice' standard articulated in [Gallewski v H. Hentz & Co. (301 NY 164 [1950])], or the less stringent 'reasonableness' standard articulated in [Robinson v Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. -
The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: a Road Map for Action
The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action www.AdirondackWild.org The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action by Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve Part 1 – New Threats Emerge: State Government Strays from its Park Mission Copyright: Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve, 2015. Primary authors of Part 1 of this report are Adirondack Wild’s Staff Partners David Gibson and Dan Plumley and Consultant Dr. Michael Klemens. This team works with an editorial committee comprised of Chris Amato, Peter Brinkley, John Johanson and Ken Rimany. Particular thanks are also owed to Adelaide Camillo and Carl George for their careful reading and helpful editing. We also thank our entire Board of Directors and Advisory Council and a number of other people outside the organization for their advice and comments. We are thankful for the design talents of Jack Graber, and the production talents of Miller Printing, Amsterdam, New York. We thank Steve Signell and Frontier Spatial for the concept of the front cover design, and illustrator David Kiphuth for the inside illustration of the Park at a Crossroad. FUNDING SUPPORT The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action is made possible by the generous financial support of the following organizations and individuals: The Bay and Paul Foundations Artwork by David Kiphuth Overhills Foundation Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve builds upon The Camp Fire Conservation Fund the work of hundreds of spirited men and women who have Furthermore: A program of the J.M. Kaplan Fund stood up for wilderness and the forest preserve − against tremendous odds − since 1885. -
Silver Lake Wilderness Unit Management Plan Resolution March 9, 2006 Page 2
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests SILVER LAKE WILDERNESS AREA Silver Lake Wilderness Sacandaga Primitive Area Cathead Mountain Primitive Area UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 2006 GEORGE E. PATAKI, Governor DENISE M. SHEEHAN, Commissioner THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Silver Lake Wilderness Area Silver Lake Wilderness Sacandaga Primitive Area Cathead Mountain Primitive Area Unit Management Plan April 2006 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands & Forests 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-4254 (518) 473-9518 www.dec.state.ny.us THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MEMORANDUM TO: The Record FROM: Denise M. Sheehan SUBJECT: Silver Lake Wilderness Area Final Unit Management Plan (Final UMP) The Final UMP for the Silver Lake Wilderness Area Final Unit Management Plan (Final UMP) has been completed. The Final UMP is consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan, the State Constitution, Environmental Conservation Law, and Department rules, regulations and policies. The Final UMP/FEIS includes management objectives and a five year budget and is hereby approved and adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ADIRONDACK PARK AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO SILVER LAKE WILDERNESS, SACANDAGA PRIMITIVE AND CATHEAD MOUNTAIN PRIMITIVE AREAS UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN March 9, 2006 WHEREAS, Section 816 of the Adirondack Park Agency Act directs the Department of Environmental Conservation to develop, in consultation with the Adirondack Park Agency, individual -
China Protected Areas Leadership Alliance Project
China Protected Areas Leadership Alliance Project Strengthening Leadership Capacity for Effective Management of China’s Protected Areas YEAR III A partnership of the China State Forestry Administration The Nature Conservancy China Program East-West Center 10 May—8 June 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………….…..…1 Map of China Model National Nature Reserves ………………………………………………………...…5 Descriptions of China’s 51 Model National Nature Reserves…………………………………..….………7 Training Needs for Protected Area Managers……………………………………………………….….…..20 Year III Participants……………….…………..………………………………………………….………...22 Participant Contact Information………………………………………………..…………….…….…….....31 Classroom Training Schedule, Beijing Forestry University ….……………………………………...…….34 Overview of Field Study and Collaborative Learning Component………......……………….……..…..….36 Map of U.S. Study Tour……………………….………………………………………………………..…..41 U.S. Field Study Agenda………………………………………………………………………...….………43 U.S. Field Study Organizations & Speakers……………………………………………….………..……...58 U.S. Field Study Speaker Contact Information……………………………………………………………..81 Project Staff ……………………………………….……………………………………………………......87 Project Staff Contact Information……………………………………………………………………….......90 Executive Summary Protection of the natural and cultural heritage of China depends on the effective management of the nation’s protected areas. The Government of China has set aside fifteen percent of its land as “protected areas,” including nature reserves and national parks. These protected -
Nysba Summer 2006 | Vol
NYSBA SUMMER 2006 | VOL. 26 | NO. 3 The New York Environmental Lawyer A publication of the Environmental Law Section of the New York State Bar Association Message from the Chair I am honored, humbled Second Vice-Chair, Joan Leary Matthews, a professor at and a little nervous as I Albany Law School. Our current Treasurer and Secretary, move into the Chair’s chair. Alan Knauf and Barry Kogut, are both in private practice, Honored, because this fi gu- and will help keep Joan, Lou and me well grounded. rative chair has previously Under the revised Bylaws we adopted several years been occupied by some of the ago, the Section Cabinet includes the fi ve offi cers plus most distinguished environ- our Section’s representative to the Association’s House of mental lawyers in New York. Delegates, and a representative from the Section Council Humbled, because I recognize (made up of all past Chairs). I’m very pleased to be work- how much there is about New ing with Phil Dixon, our very able and diligent House York State environmental law of Delegates rep; and Alice Kryzan, who has graciously that I don’t know. (I’ve worked agreed to serve as our Section Council rep for the coming my entire career for the federal year, and whose experience and good common sense will government, so I’m embar- be most helpful. rassingly ignorant about this central focus of our Section.) And nervous, because although the task seemed manage- The unusual circumstance that, for the next three able enough several years ago when I agreed to serve, it years, our Section will be chaired by attorneys not in looks considerably more demanding from close up.