DOCSLIB.ORG

TRWD Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRWD Proposal • Created in 1924 as a political subdivision of the State of Texas • Primary missions: water supply, flood control and recreation • District provides untreated surface water to customers cities • Reservoirs / Pipelines located in 8 North Central Texas counties • Four primary customers: • Arlington • Fort Worth • Mansfield • Trinity River Authority • TRWD provides water supply to more than 70 cities in 11 counties: Denton, Ellis, Freestone, Henderson, Jack, Johnson, Kaufman, Navarro, Parker, Tarrant, and Wise • TRWD serves water supply to nearly 2 million people – population expected to double by 2060. • Four reservoirs: • Lake Bridgeport • Eagle Mountain Lake • Cedar Creek Reservoir • Richland-Chambers Reservoir • More than 80% of our water comes from East Texas lakes – Richland-Chambers and Cedar Creek • $2.3 billion water supply pipeline funded by TRWD & City of Dallas • Joint project reduces construction costs by $500 million • 150-mile pipeline will deliver 350 million gallons per day to North Texas • Integrates TRWD’s existing pipeline with Dallas’ pipeline system – adds reliability • Connects Lake Palestine in East Texas to Cedar Creek and Richland-Chambers Reservoirs, and Lake Benbrook • First phase - allows additional water delivery to TRWD’s balancing reservoir in Kennedale - operational by 2020 • Makes use of return flows in the Trinity River to supplement supplies in Richland- Chambers and Cedar Creek Reservoirs. • Sustainable/available supply because it relies on the treated water released from North Texas wastewater treatment plants. • Wetlands used as a natural system to clean the river water being added to reservoirs without degrading water quality. • Creates prime wetland habitat. An ideal spot for bird watching and educational excursions. • Since 2007, TRWD water conservation initiatives have generated an average10% decrease in peak water demands. • 45 billion gallons over a five year period = an average savings of 9 billion gallons per year • Saving enough water to meet the demands of approximately 135,000 people annually • That’s a year’s supply for the communities of Hurst, Euless, Bedford and Azle • The success of water conservation in our region extends the timeline for developing new supplies beyond 2030 • Regional outreach campaign with City of Dallas since 2007 • Coordinate advertising efforts and share costs • Lawn Whisperer introduced in 2011 • Twice per week or less watering is the key message • Television, radio, billboards, newspaper, and social media – he has more than 2,000 friends on Facebook. Are you one of them? • Water conservation and reuse: 24% of new water supplies in Region C according to 2012 State Water Plan • Water conservation is the least expensive strategy • Existing resources: • Oklahoma water • Toledo Bend Pipeline • New sources: • Marvin Nichols Reservoir Proposed Oklahoma River Basins Oklahoma Water History • In 2001, a consortium of North Texas water providers approached the State of Oklahoma and the Indian tribes to purchase water. • Oklahoma’s response to Texas’ water needs was to enact a moratorium on out-of-state water transfers. • Unlike Texas in Senate Bill 1, Oklahoma has not created a state-wide water plan to determine its needs. • Oklahoma is just beginning that process. Lawsuit issues • In January 2007, TRWD filed a federal lawsuit contending the Oklahoma moratorium violates federal interstate commerce law. • After the suit was filed, TRWD then filed permit applications with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board for water in southern Oklahoma. • Oklahoma filed a motion to dismiss TRWD’s lawsuit. On October 29, a federal judge ruled in favor of TRWD on all issues. • TRWD would prefer to negotiate a contractual purchase of Oklahoma’s excess water and continues those negotiations as a preferred “win-win” resolution for both parties. Why does Oklahoma have excess water? • In the 1950’s, United States senators from Oklahoma started pushing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build reservoirs. • To get congressional backing, Oklahoma enlisted support from Texas. • The Corps used anticipated future demand from Texas municipalities to justify water development projects in Oklahoma. Legislators from Oklahoma urged the Corps to use such future demands as justification for modifying Hugo Reservoir to include water supply storage: “Let’s don’t worry too much about whether Fort Worth or Dallas might take some of our water, or Oklahoma City, because if these projects are built to the size I pray God we will build them – let’s think big thoughts and build them to that size – they will be able to supply it.” - U.S. Senator Mike Monroney (OK) in 1956 Additional quotes: “communities both here and within central Oklahoma, and yes, there in North Texas, will be knocking at the doors of the Army Engineers and of those able to supply that water, standing in line with the money in their hands, saying, ‘We are ready to help provide economic justification and economic compensation for these reservoirs.” - U.S. Senator Robert Kerr (OK) in 1956 “Water supplies for the urban and industrial development in the region are becoming inadequate. The Kiamichi River Basin offers an excellent potential source of future water supply for the central Oklahoma – north Texas region.” - Public Works Report “when the worst drought on record struck portions of the States of Oklahoma and Texas and when representatives of some of the largest cities in these States expressed interest in long-range water-supply plans of major extent, it is considered that potential users of this water should not be limited in location to the Little River Basin, but should include municipalities and industries within a radius of 100 miles or more, possibly as far away as Oklahoma City or the Dallas and Fort Worth areas.” - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Report Additional quotes: “Thank you very much, Colonel Bristor. Senator Monroney, Congressman Albert, representatives of the Corps, my friends in southeastern Oklahoma, and a hearty welcome to our good friends from across the Red River from Texas. We are certainly glad they are here. I say to you that in my judgement the difference between getting complete flood control for the Kiamichi watershed and not getting it will be the availability of the opportunity to sell municipal and industrial water from upstream dams above the previously authorized site.” - U.S. Senator Robert Kerr (OK) at public hearing in 1956 “We are proud of this country down here where most of us have lived a long time. We want to see our neighbors, Texas and Louisiana, prosper, but we want to prosper also ourselves. We want to – I don’t know, I think we are very generous in being willing for any part of the water go outside the state if we have any left over. I don’t think many states would agree to that, but I think Oklahoma would.” – U.S. Representative Carl Albert (OK) at public hearing in 1956 Additional quotes: Report by U.S. Army Chief of Engineers to the Senate Public Works Committee in 1962: “Water supplies for the urban and industrial development in the region are becoming inadequate. The Kiamichi River Basin offers an excellent potential source of future water supply for the central Oklahoma – north Texas region.” On page 15 of the report, special attention was given in determining future population growth for possible Kiamichi River Basin water supply demand areas of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, metropolitan areas. “The cities of Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas have stated they anticipate a future need for water from southeast Oklahoma, possibly from the Kiamichi River Basin.” “The metropolitan centers of Oklahoma City, Dallas and Fort Worth, northwest and southeast, respectively, of the Kiamichi River Basin, are going to need additional water supplies to sustain the anticipated growth. Therefore, the reservoirs in the Kiamichi River Basin could provide the water supply for the metropolitan areas.” Additional quotes: Report by U.S. Army Chief of Engineers to the Senate Public Works Committee in 1962: “Because of the abundant rainfall, this area is being considered more and more as a source of water supply for central and southeast Oklahoma and northern Texas…the cities of Fort Worth and Dallas, Texas, have also expressed interest in obtaining water from southeastern Oklahoma.” “The State of Oklahoma at this time holds a copy of a request to the district engineer at Tulsa, Okla., from a city in Texas, requesting substantially more storage in the project area under discussion than the total water supply storage provided for in six upstream reservoirs contained in the report. The expanded use of water and the pressing demands for municipal, industrial and power needs for it presuade us to believe that we cannot overdevelop these projects.” - Comments submitted by Governor of Oklahoma in 1956 to the U.S. Army Chief of Engineers Oklahoma Water Usage and Facts • Oklahoma has enough water in just one of the proposed river basins to serve 11 metropolitan cities the size of Oklahoma City. • The reservoirs currently available for municipal water use can provide up to four times the state’s water needs. • Perceived water shortage in western Oklahoma is due to lack of infrastructure, not lack of water. TRWD Proposal • TRWD wants to purchase surplus gulf-bound water destined for the Red River in order to meet future water needs. • Water would be captured from the Beaver, Cache and Kiamichi Rivers just before it enters the Red River and pumped back to the Fort Worth area. Key Points About TRWD’s Proposal • Absolutely no water will be taken directly from Oklahoma reservoirs. • Gulf Bound water to be taken directly before it flows into the Red River. • We want to strike an agreement outside of the courtroom. We are extremely confident that we can work out a deal with the State of Oklahoma that is a win-win for both parties. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the Line Volume Iii Caddo Indians: the Final Years
    BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS BEFORE THE LINE VOLUME III CADDO INDIANS: THE FINAL YEARS Jim Tiller Copyright © 2013 by Jim Tiller All rights reserved Bound versions of this book have been deposited at the following locations: Louisiana State University, Shreveport (Shreveport, Louisiana) Sam Houston State University (Huntsville, Texas) Stephen F. Austin State University (Nacogdoches, Texas) Texas A&M University (College Station, Texas) Texas General Land Office (Archives and Records) (Austin, Texas) Texas State Library (Austin, Texas) University of North Texas (Denton, Texas) University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) To view a pdf of selected pages of this and other works by Jim Tiller, see: http://library.shsu.edu > Digital Collection > search for: Jim Tiller Electronic versions of Vol. I, II and III as well as a limited number of bound sets of the Before the Line series are available from: The Director, Newton Gresham Library, Sam Houston State University, PO Box 2281 (1830 Bobby K. Marks Drive), Huntsville, Texas 77341 Phone: 936-294-1613 Design and production by Nancy T. Tiller The text typefaces are Adobe Caslon Pro and Myriad Pro ISBN 978-0-9633100-6-4 iv For the People of the Caddo Nation Also by Jim Tiller Our American Adventure: The History of a Pioneer East Texas Family, 1657-1967(2008) (with Albert Wayne Tiller) Named Best Family History Book by a Non-Professional Genealogist for 2008 by the Texas State Genealogical Society Before the Line Volume I An Annotated Atlas of International Boundaries and Republic of Texas Administrative Units Along the Sabine River-Caddo Lake Borderland, 1803-1841 (2010) Before the Line Volume II Letters From the Red River, 1809-1842 (2012) Jehiel Brooks and the Grappe Reservation: The Archival Record (working manuscript) vi CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • Sourcing Red River Jasper: an Archaeological and Geological Investigation of a Gravel Chert in the Red River Drainage
    Volume 2011 Article 19 2011 Sourcing Red River Jasper: An Archaeological and Geological Investigation of a Gravel Chert in the Red River Drainage Elsbeth L. Dowd Lyme Art Association, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Dowd, Elsbeth L. (2011) "Sourcing Red River Jasper: An Archaeological and Geological Investigation of a Gravel Chert in the Red River Drainage," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2011, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2011.1.19 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sourcing Red River Jasper: An Archaeological and Geological Investigation of a Gravel Chert in the Red River Drainage Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Geomorphology Analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma
    W 2800.7 F293 no. T-l9-P-l 6/04-6/06 c.l FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS OF THE KIAMICIll RIVER, OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION' JUNE 1,2004 through JUNE 30, 2006 A comprehensive geomorphic analysis of the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma was conducted to characterize the current landscape, fluvial geomorphic condition, flow and sediment regimes, and to identify potential impacts from the impoundment of the Jackfork Creek tributary to the morphological form and function of the river. The Kiamichi River channel has changed little over the last 25 years. It was classified as a Rosgen F type stream and had a basin relief ratio of 0.00345. The Kiamichi River Basin is classified as a Rosgen X type valley. Meander wavelength increased significantly in the downstream direction; the average reach meander wavelength ranged from 11 to 60 mean reach bankfull widths. Bankfull width, bankfull area, width:depth ratio, and channel stability increased in the downstream direction. Although there was no significant change in substrate size longitudinally, the percentage of gravel and cobble substrate increased and the percentage of bedrock decreased in the downstream direction. Bankfull discharge increased in the downstream direction, as expected. The majority of sites sampled were classified as Rosgen F4 stream types. The effective discharge (Qe) at the Big Cedar gaging station was estimated to be 4500 cubic feet per second (cfs) with a threshold discharge (Qt) of 0.1 cfs. The Antlers gaging station Qe was estimated to be 25,000 cfs with a Qt of 3.5 cfs. Deposition bar area below the Jackfork Creek tributary has increased over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiamichi River Basin Water Resources Development Plan
    FINAL REPORT KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PLAN Kiamichi River Basin Working Group Pursuant to HCR 1066 February 1, 2000 Prepared by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Duane A. Smith, Executive Director STATE Of OKlAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Fobfuaty 22, 2000 'os <lired«l """'" HeR 1066. tfle ~ol the Oklahoma Wal... ReOO<ltCU Boa,d henOy to<maIy..- '" "'" "8Ih 0kIa00mll SIa'a l",tura 1ha Kiamm _ Baoin Wata, AMoutcaI o.,."""",*~Plan Final Raporl. Wa ~ "'" Kiamdli _ Basin WOfI<ing G""", kit their -..lion and altO'! in ~ "'" OWR6 in 1" 01_ plan Th<l OWRB III commill"" 10 tM _ ~ 01 Oklal>oma'a wal... .-.'" tt>iI '''II'''d and ~t"';!hIha PIan'a 0XlrJl<lnI0na princopIa _ 1, .. III out <My 10 ........ Iha1 lila pr• ....-.t and luturtI _lor ....t.... by dOl<la!>:>mans or. addo ,os"" ""'" "'" l'O;I>IIl priority __,,, _ OkIoOOmllrlO 'asOding .,.;"., lh/I Kiamicni River Baoin. Wa ruHim'l the princopIa 11>01 OklaOOmll" wal", io '"'aM tor""""", tor Okl.ohomllno. Th<l Plan'. ~tior1lOclnolop _ Slatarrnbal walo&l' """'"4l"Cl pi(M(Io•• ..-.qua opportunoIy '" _ ""'" "'" CIIocto"",Cl>icI<aIllW ""liorlI"" ""'~ __lIO"lo tOf wal... <11•..."..,_, W. _ lNilllli\lOting ltI<I 0WTl0fI!lIp 01 wat only _."'" Slat. aM Trbaa. Through worlUno;J "'II"U- to find """"""" ground, can ~ 10 muctl mora tor "'" """""" 0I~.... Oklahoma, FurlMmlo<tI. we ~ any ...t", raoouroao <lI\ ,I"""te< II ot'al&gy Of plan lllat <;<>i,JId Iimrt Of ja<>par<lz. proopacIlI tor futur. g"""'" _ ~ """"""'""*" in _01 OkIat>om,o or _a in tM ....ta.
    [Show full text]
  • Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, Furnished with Your Letter Dated 21 September 1973
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT HUOO LAKE KIAMICHI RIVER, OKLAHOMA Prepared by TULSA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENC,INKERS TULSA, OKLAHOMA February 1974 Statement of Findings Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Oklahoma As Acting District Engineer, Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers, it is my duty in the role of responsible Federal Official to evaluate project data presented in the environmental statement, draw conclusions, and make recommendations to my higher authority. The overall public interest has been given the utmost consideration and personal concern in my review and evaluation of the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the public, relative to the various alternatives in accomplishing the purposes of flood con­ trol, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Therefore, I have both a professional and personal concern in drawing the soundest possible conclusions from the studies, observations, and consultations made in the investigation of Hugo Lake. Project formulation studies for Hugo Lake occurred prior to the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act. During those studies public meetings, informal meetings, and workshops were conducted within the project area to determine public preferences, opinions, needs, and objectives. All project-related information derived from these meetings was carefully evaluated during plan formulation and was incorporated into the planning ana development of Hugo Lake for the total public interest. The construction of the project was 83 percent complete on 31 October 1973. A draft environmental statement was completed and released for review by other agencies, groups, and individuals on 21 September 1973. The final statement was then prepared utilizing comments received on the draft statement, technical assistance from the University of Oklahoma, and additional environmental studies by the Corps of Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw County, Ok Choctaw County Choctaw County
    CHOCTAW COUNTY, OK CHOCTAW COUNTY CHOCTAW COUNTY REGIONAL CONTEXT LABOR MARKET OVERVIEW, 2017 OKLAHOMA Civilian Labor Force 1,834,312 Employed 1,755,604 Unemployed 78,708 Unemployment Rate 4.3% CHOCTAW 11-COUNTY AREA Civilian Labor Force 102,418 Employed 96,655 Unemployed 5,763 Unemployment Rate 5.6% CHOCTAW COUNTY Civilian Labor Force 5,707 Employed 5,346 Unemployed 360 Unemployment Rate 6.3% FAST FACTS BY THE NUMBERS KEY ASSETS • Major employers include: Choctaw Nation, Little Dixie Community Action Agency, Gentiva Home Health, Kiamichi Railroad, Diamond T Metals, Western Farmers Electric Co-op, and Choctaw Electric Co-op • Major manufacturers include: Trinity Industries, SW 14,863 4,834 Fabricators 2017 Population 2017 Jobs • Natural resources include: water, timber, and rock • Stan Stamper Municipal airport has fuel and tiedowns From Hugo: • 138 miles to DFW airport • 200 miles to Will Rogers airport (Oklahoma City) • Access to Hwy 70/271 and Indian Nation Turnpike • Hugo Reservoir (138,528 acres-feet capacity), Red 87.6 $13.08 River and Kiamichi River Cost of Living Index Median Hourly Wage (US average=100) (US median=$17.81) • Proximity to Paris, TX Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (state and county labor market data, wages). Data for 2017 is an annual average calculated by TIP; EMSI 2017.4 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, and Self-Employed (wage and cost of living data); Hugo March 2016 34 (Frisco Depot Park) by Michael Barera via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) (header image). PAGE
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Frequency Estimates and Documented and Potential Extreme Peak Discharges in Oklahoma
    Prepared in cooperation with the OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Flood Frequency Estimates and Documented and Potential Extreme Peak Discharges in Oklahoma Water-Resources Investigations Report 01–4152 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph was taken October 23, 2000, during the Apache, Oklahoma, flood. Photographer: Stanley Wright, The Apache News. Tortorelli, R.L., and McCabe, L.P.—Flood Frequency Estimated and Documented Potential Extreme Peak Discharges in Oklahoma—USGS/WRIR 01–4152 Printed on recycled paper Flood Frequency Estimates and Documented and Potential Extreme Peak Discharges in Oklahoma By Robert L. Tortorelli and Lan P. McCabe In Cooperation with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation Water-Resources Investigations Report 01–4152 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2001 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 202 NW 66 St., Bldg. 7 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Information about water resources in Oklahoma is available on the World Wide Web at http://ok.water.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, it contains copyrighted materials that are noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. FISH and WILDLIFE SERVICE, REGION 2 Environmental QUALITY PROGRAM
    U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, REGION 2 ENViRONMENTAL QUALITY PROGRAM bY Dan B. Martin U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office 222 South Houston, Suite A Tulsa, Oklahoma 74127 June 1997 CONCENTRATIONS OF SELECTED ELEMENTS in THE KIAMICHI RIVER ABOVE HUGO RESERVOIR Study Identifier 2F28 Prepared By U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Tulsa, Oklahoma Author Dan Martin June 1997 ABSTRACT Bulk element concentrations in soil collected from undisturbed forested sites throughout the Kiamichi River watershed above Hugo Reservoir were significantly higher in aluminum, arsenic, chromium, iron, lead, manganese and zinc than Kiamichi River sediment. There was no difference between soil and sediment with respect to copper, magnesium and nickel; cadmium, selenium and mercury could not be compared due to lack of detection in a sufficient number of samples. Geochemical normalization of soil and sediment data revealed that copper, magnesium, manganese and nickel were apparently enriched in sediment, whereas arsenic and lead were depleted. There was no difference with respect to chromium, iron or zinc. A comparison of element concentrations in the Kiamichi River sediment with guidelines suggested for the protection of benthic organisms indicated that sediments in this section of the river are not likely to be harmful. Significant differences in the concentration of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, lead, magnesium and zinc were found between shoots and roots of water willow; whereas concentrations of aluminum, copper, manganese and nickel were similar in the two types of tissue. Mercury and selenium were not detected in plant tissues. Water willow did not bioaccumulate elements from sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Spreads Faith, Family and Culture by CHRIS JENNINGS Was a Three-Month Process
    Photos by Chris Jennings Tribal officials, store employees and community members gather for the ribbon cutting of the new Choctaw Country Market in Boswell, Oklahoma. Choctaw Nation photo The Choctaw Cultural Center in Durant is 38 percent The Choctaw Nation Judicial Center is 99 percent complete and currently serving clients. A complete. ribbon cutting is scheduled for April 25, 2019. April 2019 Issue A panoramic image of the Choctaw Country Market in Boswell shows the wide selection of fruit and vegetables available. The store also features a diner that is currently serving hot meals. Gas pumps will be open soon, further adding to the convenience the market provides. Growth Spreads Faith, Family and Culture by CHRIS JENNINGS was a three-month process. I went out and met all the Choctaw artists and gave them our vision and they created the originals to meet our vision.” The Choctaw Nation continues its initiative of keeping communities alive with All of the artists will be available to talk about their art at a ribbon cutting for the ongoing growth across the 10 ½ counties. The most recent sign of this is the opening federal building on April 25. Also available at the ribbon cutting will be Joy Cul- of the new Choctaw Country Market in Boswell. breath and Kathy Carpenter for a book signing of their new book on the Choctaw On top of bringing a new level of convenience to nearby citizens, the new store is constitution. making strides to combat the problem of food deserts across the country. The Cen- The public will be able to tour the building and get a hands-on demonstration of ters for Disease Control and Prevention describes a food desert as an area that does the electronic filing system.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis Ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 59 Article 20 2005 Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W. Robison Southern Arkansas University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, Henry W. (2005) "Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Nottropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae)," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 59 , Article 20. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol59/iss1/20 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 59 [2005], Art. 20 Distribution and Status of the Kiamichi Shiner, Notropis ortenburgeri Hubbs (Cyprinidae) Henry W. Robison Department ofBiologicalSciences, Southern Arkansas University, Magnolia, AR 71754-9354 Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract The Kiamichi shiner, Notropis ortenburgeri, a diminuitive,silvery, upland stream fish in southwestern Arkansas and eastern Oklahoma was studied from 1999-2001 to determine its distribution, habitat, and conservation status in Arkansas and Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Antlers Aquifer in Southeastern Oklahoma and Northeastern Texas
    SIMULATION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW IN THE ANTLERS AQUIFER IN SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA AND NORTHEASTERN TEXAS By ROBERT B. MORTON Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 88-4208 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 1992 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 202 NW 66th Street, Bldg. 7 Federal Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73116 Box 25425 Denver, Colorado 80225 ERRATA: Plates 1-7 are incorrectly labeled as: OPEN-FILE REPORT 88-4208; they should be labeled as: WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 88-4208. CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 2 Location and general description of the study area 2 Previous studies 2 Acknowledgments 4 Geologic setting 4 Ground-water hydrology of the study area 5 Ground-water flow system 5 Recharge and discharge 6 Hydraulic conductivity, storage coefficient, and specific yield 7 Ground-water use 8 Description of the digital model 9 General discussion 9 Model boundaries 10 Assumptions and calibration of the model 11 Sensitivity analysis 14 Pumping simulations for decennial years, 1990-2040 14 Summary and conclusions 18 Selected references 18 Glossary of technical terms 20 PLATES [Plates are in pocket at back of report.] 1. Maps showing: A. Observed potentiometric surface, 1970, Antlers aquifer B. Altitude of the top of the Antlers aquifer C. Altitude of the base of the Antlers aquifer 2.
    [Show full text]
  • I RECONSTRUCTING the CHOCTAW NATION of OKLAHOMA, 1894-1898
    RECONSTRUCTING THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA, 1894-1898: LANDSCAPE AND SETTLEMENT ON THE EVE OF ALLOTMENT By BRADLEY W. WATKINS Bachelor of Arts in Geography The University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 2000 Master of Arts in Geography The University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 2002 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 2007 i RECONSTRUCTING THE CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA, 1894-1898: LANDSCAPE AND SETTLEMENT ON THE EVE OF ALLOTMENT Dissertation Approved: Allen Finchum Dissertation Advisor Bruce Hoagland Research Advisor Hongbo Yu Alyson Greiner L. G. Moses A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my mentor and friend, Dr. Bruce Hoagland, for his helpful comments through the years. He introduced me to the source materials on which this dissertation is based almost ten years ago. Bruce, you had me at GLO. I also wish to thank the members of my research committee, Dr. Allen Finchum, Dr. L. G. Moses, Dr. Alyson Greiner, and Dr. Hongbo Yu, for their many helpful comments through the various stages of this project. In addition, Dr. Richard Nostrand, Dr. Charles Gritzner, and Dr. Mark Miccozzi provided support for the topic. I have been lucky to have had extremely thoughtful friends in geography whom have given their opinions and support. In particular, my good friend Whit Durham listened to my incessant ramblings of all things Choctaw with a smile. Ranbir Kang, Jasper Dung, Dave Brockway, Aswin Subanthore, William Flynn, and Zok Pavlovic also provided extremely helpful ideas and support.
    [Show full text]