Mies, Politics, and the Bauhaus Closure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mies, Politics, and the Bauhaus Closure 85THACSA ANNUAL MEETING ANDTECHNOLOGY (ONFEKENCE 617 Mies, Politics, and the Bauhaus Closure RANDALL OTT University of Colorado From the very moment of its inception by Walter Gropius in of instruction." Meyer noted that: "The influence on the 19 19, the Bauhaus School never enjoyed a politically stable, students over the way life was lived at the Bauhaus was wiped much less supportive, public climate. In retrospect widely AS Sandra Honey has put it, "spiritually the real celebrated as the greatest art and design school of the modern Bauhaus ended with Meyer's di~inissal."~Under Mies, age, the Bauhaus throughout its relatively brief 14-year social activism of any overt sort within the school was existence was constantly faced with ideologically based brutally repressed. Controversial works-a painting on the attacks and subsequent abrupt closures, as the school's subject of abortion, for instancewere removed froin exhi- peripatetic wanderings from Weimar to Dessau and finally bitions before they opened.' Mies's tough approach seemed to Berlin in search of acceptancmr at least tolerance-- to work for a while, even after the school had been forced by clearly indicate. No matter where this progressive and a cutoff of municipal hnds in Dessau to relocate to Berlin as experimental school opened its doors, political controversy a private institution. Ultimately. though. despite all Mies's seemed to rapidly and virulently follow. tough actions, the Gestapo trucks appeared at the door ofthe It is within the context of this climate of constant political Bauhaus in Berlin on the morning on April 1 lth, 1933, for hostility in various locales and under various regimes that we final loading. The school would never reopen. must view the harsh actions taken by the Modem architect What is much less well known about the final, Miesian Mies van der Rohe upon his assulnption of the directorate of years of the Bauhaus is the exact nature of the changes that the Bauhaus in the summer of 1930, while the school was still Mies made in pedagogy, as opposed to the specific lirnita- located in Dessau. The fierce turmoil surrounding the tions he put on the students' political activism. What were Bauhaus' final years of existence under Mies-the accusa- his specific curricular steps toward creating a "school of tions of Bolshevism, the inspections by the local Dessau instruction?" And what ramifications did these changes authorities, the relocation to Berlin, and the school's ulti- have for the pre-existing modernist program of aesthetics at mate padlocking and collapse at the hands of the Nazis-are the Bauhaus? In response to the political retrenchment well known aspects of Bauhaus lore. Committed to cleans- within the increasingly conservative climate that surrounded ing the school of any and all political taints as the only hope the school, especially in its final days in Dessau and Berlin, for its survival, and faced with not just hostility but a near riot did Mies try to foster an aesthetic retrenchment as well? as a reaction to his appointment in Dessau by many of the Further, what did these decisions say about Mies's own students, Mies ilnmediately called in the local police to clear reasons for taking on the controversial, difficult and thank- the school. He then ordered each student into his office less task of sanitizing the Bauhaus? Before confronting, individually and threatened immediate expulsion if the rules though, these complicated issues surrounding Mies's peda- were not adhered to. A follow-up letter infonned each gogical actions as director, we should review in more detail student "to not stay late in the canteen in the evening, to avoid the nature and force of the political travails that afflicted the political discussions, and to take care not to make any noise Bauhaus in Wei~narand in Dessau, prior to Mies's arrival, in in the town and to go out well dressed."' Mies felt that order to give a full context to his decisions. authoritarianism, a concept quite foreign to the original No sooner had Gropius founded the school in Weimar, the Bauhaus ideal, was necessary to keep the more radical, left- small, non-industrial and inherently rather conservative leaning students under control. Hannes Meyer. an outspo- capital city of Thuringia (a provisional Federal state which. ken Comlnunist sympathizer who had been Mies's immedi- interestingly enough, was to give the Nazis their first state- ate predecessor as director and who had to be summarily wide electoral victory in 1930"). then did he have to begin fired by the city under intense political pressure. sadly defending the Bauhaus against what would become common described these changes of Mies's as a "return to the school accusations of cosmopolitanism. Vague assertions of "po- AR('HITECT1lKE: MATERIAL AND IMAGINED litical activities"' within the Bauhaus ancCeven Inore omi- authorities, and given Mies's own distaste for political nously--of the harboring of students "alien to the race"' intrigue, it is far from clear why Mics agreed to accept the were made within the school's first year, and Gropius was Bauhaus directorate. ilmnediately forced to reply at the town council that all the Elaine Hochrnan, in her book Architects c?f'For.tune.Mies school's students were Gennan speakers and of Gennan vtrrl der Rohe and the Third Reich. has tnade an extensive origin. Me went on to re~narkthat "only 17 students are of study of this period of Mies's career, and has discussed a Jewish extraction" and of thcse "most have been bapti~ed."~ number of potential reasons that may have lain behind While these early accusations were officially found to be Mies's willingness. Philip Johnson, in a letter to Hochman, groundless, this did little to quiet hostility toward the Bau- suggested that only extreme financial distress could have haus. Local craftsmen and trade groups remained highly prompted Mies to accept this post,I9 an opinion that has also suspicious ofthe Bauhaus's aim to collaborate with industry. been offered by others.20Hoch~nan finds this explanation to fearing competition for jobs."' By 1924. state funds were bc insufficient. and goes on to speculate at length that: slashed in half and the Bauhaus's status in Weitnar became something else lay in the back of [Mies's] tnind. It was increasingly untenable. Faculty contracts were to be re- very clear by late July 1930 . that the Nazis were newed for only six lnonths at a time." The Bauhaus masters looming as an ilnportant political force in Gennany. voted to close the Weimar incarnation of the school only a What better forum to convince them of Modernism's few lnonths later.I2anda series ofproposals from other. more apoliticisrn than the Bauhaus, its most prominent and liberal cities offering to house the Bauhaus were considered, politicized symbol? Eliminate politics from the Bau- with Dessau's ultimately being accepted. Dessau, then haus and the centerpiece of Nazi opposition to Mod- under Socialist party rule, seemed a more appropriate loca- ernism would collapse. The Bauhaus, in this perspee- tion for the Bauhaus. tive, offered the key to Modernism's-and [Mies's] While the Bauhaus seemed to find greater peace during its ow~urvivalunder a Nazi govemnent. There was first few years following the relocation in 1925 to the larger no way he could build in a Nazi-dominated Gennany and more industrially oriented city of Dessau, controversy unless ~nodernislnwas decisively and pennanently ultimately erupted there as well. Brought to Dessau at the severed from its crippling, and in Mies's mind, irrel- instigation of the Social Democratic mayor Fritz Hesse, the evant political associations. The Bauhaus would be school was given entirely new and customized facilities built the laboratory where Mies would prove his case.2' to the designs of Gropius, and the curriculu~nwas expanded in 1927 to include a department ofarchitecture, to be headed These are seductive thoughts, particularly as they present by Hannes Meyer." Even so, political attacks soon began Mies in a rather flattering light-making him into a funda- again in earnest. municipal budget cuts followed,'hnd mentally altruistic visionary who would, for the sake of Gropius, under the pressure of his own practice. decided to easing the potentially sony plight of Modernism in Gennany resign as director, claiming "that until now ninety percent of under the Nazis as much as for any personal gain, take on the my work has been devoted to the defense ofthe school."" As unpleasant task of lifting the Bauhaus from the political a replacement Gropius proposed Meyer, an appointment gutter and sanitizing it. that, given Meyer's overtly Colnlnunist political leanings We cannever. obviously, know for sure what lay inMies's and the increasingly conservative climate taking hold even mind as he considered and then accepted the Bauhaus in Dessau, would prove to be nothing short of disastrous for directorate, and Hochman's reasonable suggestions would the school. Meyer's pedantic emphasis on social issues at the certainly explain part of Mies's actions. There is no doubt expense of all else not only antagonized the painters but that Mies dealt swiftly and harshly with all expressions of fostered a Comlnunist cell amongst the students. Marxist political activism when he arrived at the Bauhaus, rapidly songs were sung, incidents were reported in the right-wing and brutally excising the "genn cell of Bol~hevism"'~fos- press, and Meyer's days were numbered.'" tered by Meyer. Yet the actual changes in pedagogy that he After Meycr's fiery dis~nissalin 1930 following a report instituted upon arriving at the school suggest that at least part of the contribution he had made in the Bauhaus's name to of his motive in assuming the directorate may have been striking Colmnunist miners, Gropius recommnended approach- much simpler and Inore personal than a desire to save the ing Mies for the job, feeling that only someone with a depth and breadth of Modernism in Germany.
Recommended publications
  • Berlín-Detroit Kahatt, Sharif S.: El Viaje De Un Ideal. Ideas Urbanas En
    Berlín - Detroit: el viaje de un ideal Ideas urbanas en Lafayette Park, 1956 Sharif S. Kahatt Arquitecto. Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima Las últimas causas de aquello que ocurre en la actualidad se encuentran en las discusiones de monjes aislados detrás de los muros de conventos románicos. Mies van der Rohe* Lafayette Park es una de las obras de mayores dimensio- nes y también una de las más desatendidas de Mies van der Rohe, tanto por sus estudiosos como por la crítica especializada, que desde la reivindicación del maestro alemán a finales de la década anterior, ha convertido sus obras en objetos de culto. Dentro de las publicaciones que consolidaron el rena- cimiento miesiano, Mies in Berlin y Mies in America1, no se publicaron documentos ni trabajos de investigación que den luz sobre cómo fue planteada y desarrollada esta obra. Entre las varias decenas de libros y catálogos de imágenes, apenas en algunas se menciona la realización de Lafayette Park y en otras pocas se ofrecen algunos datos básicos de las fechas de planteamiento y construc- ción. Incluso en los trabajos dedicados a Ludwig Hilberseimer, quien presenta una obra mucho menos extensa (que Mies) y donde Lafayette Park debería ocu- par el rol más importante, este proyecto permanece rela- tivamente relegado2. Lafayette Park. Propuesta de ordenación general. Sólo la reciente publicación de una monografía ha puesto en valor el conjunto de Detroit: Case, Lafayette Park3. El libro se compone de un grupo de escritos dedi- cados a distintos aspectos de la obra de Detroit. 226 dc De ellos, los mejores ensayos buscan construir el equilibrio entre el individuo y la sociedad, así como entre las pensamiento dominante del proyecto, relacionando las fuerzas materiales y espirituales.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannes Meyer's Scientific Worldview and Architectural Education at The
    Hannes Meyer’s Scientific Worldview and Architectural Education at the Bauhaus (1927-1930) Hideo Tomita The Second Asian Conference of Design History and Theory —Design Education beyond Boundaries— ACDHT 2017 TOKYO 1-2 September 2017 Tsuda University Hannes Meyer’s Scientific Worldview and Architectural Education at the Bauhaus (1927-1930) Hideo Tomita Kyushu Sangyo University [email protected] 29 Abstract Although the Bauhaus’s second director, Hannes Meyer (1889-1954), as well as some of the graduates whom he taught, have been much discussed in previous literature, little is known about the architectural education that Meyer shaped during his tenure. He incorporated key concepts from biology, psychology, and sociology, and invited specialists from a wide variety of fields. The Bauhaus under Meyer was committed to what is considered a “scientific world- view,” and this study focuses on how Meyer incorporated this into his theory of architectural education. This study reveals the following points. First, Meyer and his students used sociology to design analytic architectural diagrams and spatial standardizations. Second, they used psy- chology to design spaces that enabled people to recognize a symbolized community, to grasp a social organization, and to help them relax their mind. Third, Meyer and his students used hu- man biology to decide which direction buildings should face and how large or small that rooms and windows should be. Finally, Meyer’s unified scientific worldview shared a similar theoreti- cal structure to the “unity of science” movement, established by the founding members of the Vienna Circle, at a conceptual level. Keywords: Bauhaus, Architectural Education, Sociology, Psychology, Biology, Unity of Science Hannes Meyer’s Scientific Worldview and Architectural Education at the Bauhaus (1927–1930) 30 The ACDHT Journal, No.2, 2017 Introduction In 1920s Germany, modernist architects began to incorporate biology, sociology, and psychol- ogy into their architectural theory based on the concept of “function” (Gropius, 1929; May, 1929).
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Hilberseimer at the Illinois Institute of Technology: Architectural Education, Organic Democracy and Colonization
    Ludwig Hilberseimer at the Illinois Institute of Technology: Architectural Education, Organic Democracy and Colonization. 34 docomomo 49 — 2013/2 docomomo49.indd 34 18/03/14 18:11 udwig Hilberseimer’s role at defining trends in architectural education in the United States is a relevant one, and deserves special attention due to its rigorous method. This article aims to cast Llight at his teaching experience at IIT, where he promoted an integration of urban theory and political ideals. Understood as an act of cultural colonization, architectural education appears as a powerful tool to reshape the territory in the United States and the world, as part of an ongoing process of Modern postwar globalization. By Plácido González Martínez t may seem paradoxical, but when asked about the The hierarchical scheme of the Settlement Unit served as names of his most influential teachers, Ludwig Hilber- a translation of Kropotkin’s organic social ideals into ur- Iseimer did not mention one, but a list of books. To- ban forms and principles. The democratic ideals underly- wards the end of his life and being the compulsive reader ing its design provided a powerful ideological backing to he had always been, he was convinced of the power of Hilberseimer’s teaching methods at IIT. paper as an effective way of conveying knowledge, in Following Mies van der Rohe’s definition of architec- contrast to the vanishing corporeity of old professors and ture as “structure plus the expression of structure”, the fish the uncertainty of their variable opinions. spine diagram of the Settlement Unit offered an urban Nevertheless, Hilberseimer’s teaching experience is structural archetype that remained undefined as of its for- quite an exceptional story within the evolution of archi- mal expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in Modernist Architects' Design Thinking
    arts Article Function and Form: Shifts in Modernist Architects’ Design Thinking Atli Magnus Seelow Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-72-968-88-85 Academic Editor: Marco Sosa Received: 22 August 2016; Accepted: 3 November 2016; Published: 9 January 2017 Abstract: Since the so-called “type-debate” at the 1914 Werkbund Exhibition in Cologne—on individual versus standardized types—the discussion about turning Function into Form has been an important topic in Architectural Theory. The aim of this article is to trace the historic shifts in the relationship between Function and Form: First, how Functional Thinking was turned into an Art Form; this orginates in the Werkbund concept of artistic refinement of industrial production. Second, how Functional Analysis was applied to design and production processes, focused on certain aspects, such as economic management or floor plan design. Third, how Architectural Function was used as a social or political argument; this is of particular interest during the interwar years. A comparison of theses different aspects of the relationship between Function and Form reveals that it has undergone fundamental shifts—from Art to Science and Politics—that are tied to historic developments. It is interesting to note that this happens in a short period of time in the first half of the 20th Century. Looking at these historic shifts not only sheds new light on the creative process in Modern Architecture, this may also serve as a stepstone towards a new rethinking of Function and Form. Keywords: Modern Architecture; functionalism; form; art; science; politics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Constructivism
    De Stijl in the Netherlands Russian Constructivism 26 Constructivism was an artistic and architectural movement that originated in Russia from 1919 onward which rejected the idea of "art for art's sake" in favour of art as a practice directed towards social purposes and uses. Constructivism as an active force lasted until around 1934, having a great deal of effect on developments in the art of the Weimar Republic (post world war one Germany) and elsewhere, before being replaced by Socialist Realism. Its motifs have sporadically recurred in other art movements since. It had a lasting impact on modern design through some of its members becoming involved with the Bauhaus group. Constructivism had a particularly lasting effect on typography and graphic design. Constructivism art refers to the optimistic, non-representational relief construction, sculpture, kinetics and painting. The artists did not believe in abstract ideas, rather they tried to link art with concrete and tangible ideas. Early modern movements around WWI were idealistic, seeking a new order in art and architecture that dealt with social and economic problems. They wanted to renew the idea that the apex of artwork does not revolve around "fine art", but rather emphasized that the most priceless artwork can often be discovered in the nuances of "practical art" and through portraying man and mechanization into one aesthetic program. Constructivism was first created in Russia in 1913 when the Russian sculptor Vladimir Tatlin, during his journey to Paris, discovered the works of Braque and Picasso. When Tatlin was back in Russia, he began producing sculptured out of assemblages, but he abandoned any reference to precise subjects or themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Af22a04f316b4a77.Pdf
    Bauhaus Museum Dessau (en) 1 ) Opening 2019 1 Every year 100,000 visitors from all over the world come to the Bauhaus Dessau to see the UNESCO World Heritage site. With the opening of the Bauhaus Museum Dessau in 2019, visitors will be able to see a compre- hensive display of the Bauhaus Des- sau Foundation’s unique collection for the very first time. The museum, designed by up-and- coming addenda architects (González Hinz Zabala) of Barcelona, is currently under construction in the centre of Dessau. The prizewinning design was chosen in 2015 from 831 entries to an open international architecture compe- tition. The architects’ concept envisag- es a transparent structure with a Black 2 Box for the presentation of the collec- tion seemingly suspended inside it on the top floor and an Open Stage as platform for contemporary statements and temporary exhibitions on the ground floor. The world’s second-largest Bauhaus collection comprises more than 40,000 exhibits including architectural draw- ings, photographs, graphics, paintings and stage works as well as objects from everyday life such as furniture, lamps, tableware, textiles or advertis- ing graphics. 3 2 ) “Versuchsstätte Bauhaus. The Collection.” 6 Utopia and everyday life: after the First World War the Bauhauslers sought methods of shap- ing and designing the new, modern way of living. Whether typefaces, furniture, textiles, wallpapers or buildings, the modern culture of everyday life that we take for granted today was forged in Dessau during this period. The Dessau collection is distinctive: its exhibits and objects tell the story of teaching and learn- ing, free design and the development of indus- trial prototypes, artistic experiment and en- gagement with the marketplace at the to-date unparalleled school of design.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Personal Non-Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge
    Hobbs, Mark (2010) Visual representations of working-class Berlin, 1924–1930. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/2182/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Visual representations of working-class Berlin, 1924–1930 Mark Hobbs BA (Hons), MA Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD Department of History of Art Faculty of Arts University of Glasgow February 2010 Abstract This thesis examines the urban topography of Berlin’s working-class districts, as seen in the art, architecture and other images produced in the city between 1924 and 1930. During the 1920s, Berlin flourished as centre of modern culture. Yet this flourishing did not exist exclusively amongst the intellectual elites that occupied the city centre and affluent western suburbs. It also extended into the proletarian districts to the north and east of the city. Within these areas existed a complex urban landscape that was rich with cultural tradition and artistic expression. This thesis seeks to redress the bias towards the centre of Berlin and its recognised cultural currents, by exploring the art and architecture found in the city’s working-class districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Forms, Ideals, and Methods. Bauhaus Transfers to Mandatory Palestine
    Ronny Schüler Forms, Ideals, and Methods. Bauhaus Transfers to Mandatory Palestine Introduction A “Bauhaus style” would be a setback to academic stagnation, into a state of inertia hostile to life, the combatting of which the Bauhaus was once founded. May the Bauhaus be saved from this death. Walter Gropius, 1930 The construction activities of the Jewish community in the British Mandate of Palestine represents a prominent paradigm for the spread of European avant-garde architecture. In the 1930s, there is likely no comparable example for the interaction of a similar variety of influences in such a confined space. The reception of architectural modernism – referred to as “Neues Bauen” in Germany – occurred in the context of a broad cultural transfer process, which had already begun in the wake of the waves of immigration (“Aliyot”) from Eu- rope at the end of the nineteenth century and had a formative effect within the emancipating Jewish community in Palestine (“Yishuv”). Among the growing number of immigrants who turned their backs on Europe with the rise of fas- cism and National Socialism were renowned intellectuals, artists, and archi- tects. They brought the knowledge and experience they had acquired in their 1 On the transfer process of modernity European homelands. In the opposite direction too, young people left to gain using the example of the British Mandate of Palestine, see. Heinze-Greenberg 2011; 1 professional knowledge, which was beneficial in their homeland. Dogramaci 2019; Stabenow/Schüler 2019. Despite the fact that, in the case of Palestine, the broad transfer processes were fueled by a number of sources and therefore represent the plurality of European architectural modernism, the Bauhaus is assigned outstanding 2 importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus Dessau Foundation Gropiusallee 38 06846 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany Phone 0049-340-6508-250
    Bauhaus Dessau Foundation Gropiusallee 38 06846 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany phone 0049-340-6508-250 www.bauhaus-dessau.de Institutional funding: World Heritage Site Bauhaus Expansion: Former ADGB Bernau Trade Union School Berlin Dessau Bauhaus building Masters’ Houses Weimar Expansion: Houses with Balcony Access Former art academy and for- mer school of arts and crafts Haus Am Horn UNESCO World Heritage Convention The purpose of UNESCO as an organisation of the United Nations is “to contribute to peace and security by promoting collaboration among the nations through education, science and culture”. UNESCO is working towards this goal with a range of programmes, which from 1972 have also included the World Her- itage Convention as an instrument to protect the world cultural and natural heritage The world cultural and natural heritage includes monuments of past civilisations, great works of art and unique natural land- scapes, the destruction of which would constitute an irreplace- able loss for all of humanity. World Heritage Sites are of outstand- ing universal value and authentic and their integrity is largely preserved. Their protection is therefore not the sole responsibility of a single nation, but a task for the international community. The World Heritage List encompasses over 1,000 natural land- scapes and cultural sites in 163 countries worldwide. Germany is represented on the List by 40 World Heritage Sites. www.unesco.de www.whc.unesco.org/en/list Cover: Three Bauhauslers on the southern side entrance canopy before the lettering of the Bau- haus building in Dessau, 1929, Photo: unknown, Bauhaus Dessau Foundation | All colour pictures: Photo: Christoph Petras, 2011 © ARGE model bauhaus 2009 c/o Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau Planned expansion of the World Heritage Site Bauhaus In 2016 an application was made to UNESCO to add to the World Heritage Site Bauhaus the Bauhaus building Houses with Balcony Access and the ADGB Trade Union School, built under the stewardship Masters’ Houses of the second Bauhaus director Hannes Meyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Opens in a Cascade of Trapezoidal Shapes, Like Shards of Glass
    World Monuments Fund/Knoll Modernism Prize 2008 award to Brenne Gesellschaft von Architekten mbH For the restoration of the ADGB Trade Union School (1928–1930) Bernau, Germany designed by Hannes Meyer and Hans Wittwer 1 2 This restoration highlights and emphasizes a particular approach to historic preservation that is perhaps the most sensible and intellectually satisfying today. Brenne Gesellschaft von Architekten is probably Germany’s most engaged and thoughtful restorer of classic Modern architecture. —Dietrich NeumaNN, JUROR Pre-restoration During the period in which the ADGB building was under East German control, it was impossible to find appropriate glass for repairs, so the light-filled glass corridor was obscured by a wooden parapet. Brenne Gesellschaft von Architekten restored the original materials and reintroduced the original bright red color of the steel framing. 3 Many of the building’s steel casement windows are highly articulated. The glass in the external staircase opens in a cascade of trapezoidal shapes, like shards of glass. 4 Despite Modernism’s influential place in our architectural heritage, many significant Modern buildings are endangered because of neglect, perceived obsolescence, inappropriate renovation, or even the imminent danger of demolition. In response to these threats, in 2006, the World Monuments Fund launched its Modernism at Risk Initiative with generous support from founding sponsor Knoll, Inc. The World Monuments Fund/Knoll Modernism Prize was established as part of this initiative to demonstrate that Modern buildings can remain sustainable structures with vital futures. The Prize, which will be awarded biennially, recognizes innovative architectural and design solutions that preserve or enhance Modern landmarks and advances recognition of the special challenges of conserving Modern architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Housing in Mies Van Der Rohe9s Lafayette Towers
    1999 ACSA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEmROME 161 Luxury and Fate: Social Housing in Mies Van Der Rohe9sLafayette Towers JANINE DEBANNE iversity of Detroit Mercy INTRODUCTION Lafayette Park sits immediately to the east of Detroit's Central Business District, severed from it by an expressway that runs northward toward the distant suburbs. Icon of the urban renewal movement, it is the fruit of a collaboration between urban planner Ludwig Hilberseimer and architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and Mies' largest realized residential project. The reasons that motivated its inception were not unusual. Like many American cities, Detroit faced the problem of exodus to the suburbs and the deterioration of inner city residential neighborhoods. Because of its origins in urban renewal, it has perennially echoed the economic and social transfor- mations taking placein thecity at large.' Specifically,LafayettePark has been involved in a complex relationship with the city's poor, both causing them to lose their homes in the 1950's and beckoning them back in the early nineteen nineties after the worst years of Detroit's urban crisis.' In sharp contrast to his residential towers for Chicago, Mies can der Rohe's architecture was confronted in Detroit Fig. I. Lafayette Park viewed from downtown Detroit, figuring the now with a set ofcircurnstances under which it \vould be forced todisplay demolished Hudson Building in foreground. its own contradictions. DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The twenty-one low-rise townhouse buildings designed by Mies vander Rohestill shimmeragainstthe backdropofAlfredCaldwell's flowing landscapes of footpaths. His three high-rise towers, with their precise clear aluminum curtain walled faAades, stand in sharp contrast to the ruination of the surrounding areas.' If from adistance this place appears to be unmarked by time, it is nonetheless woven into the very coniplex social and human fabric of Detroit's post- industrial history.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years of Bauhaus
    Excursions to the Visit the Sites of the Bauhaus Sites of and the Bauhaus Modernism A travel planner and Modernism! ↘ bauhaus100.de/en # bauhaus100 The UNESCO World Heritage Sites and the Sites of Bauhaus Modernism Hamburg P. 31 Celle Bernau P. 17 P. 29 Potsdam Berlin P. 13 Caputh P. 17 P. 17 Alfeld Luckenwalde Goslar Wittenberg P. 29 P. 17 Dessau P. 29 P. 10 Quedlinburg P. 10 Essen P. 10 P. 27 Krefeld Leipzig P. 27 P. 19 Düsseldorf Löbau Zwenkau Weimar P. 19 P. 27 Dornburg Dresden P. 19 Gera P. 19 P. 7 P. 7 P. 7 Künzell P. 23 Frankfurt P. 23 Kindenheim P. 25 Ludwigshafen P. 25 Völklingen P. 25 Karlsruhe Stuttgart P. 21 P. 21 Ulm P. 21 Bauhaus institutions that maintain collections Modernist UNESCO World Heritage Sites Additional modernist sites 3 100 years of bauhaus The Bauhaus: an idea that has really caught on. Not just in Germany, but also worldwide. Functional design and modern construction have shaped an era. The dream of a Gesamtkunst- werk—a total work of art that synthesises fine and applied art, architecture and design, dance and theatre—continues to this day to provide impulses for our cultural creation and our living environments. The year 2019 marks the 100 th anniversary of the celebration, but the allure of an idea that transcends founding of the Bauhaus. Established in Weimar both time and borders. The centenary year is being in 1919, relocated to Dessau in 1925 and closed in marked by an extensive programme with a multitude Berlin under pressure from the National Socialists in of exhibitions and events about architecture 1933, the Bauhaus existed for only 14 years.
    [Show full text]