View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository PESTICIDES, POLLUTION, AND THE UK’S SILENT SPRING, 1963-64: POISON IN THE GARDEN OF ENGLAND by J.F.M. Clark School of History, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK
[email protected] Despite being characterized as ‘one of the worst agricultural accidents in Britain in the 1960s’, the ‘Smarden incident’ has never been subjected to a complete historical analysis. In 1963, a toxic waste spill in Kent coincided with the publication of the British edition of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. This essay argues that these events combined to ‘galvanize’ nascent toxic and environmental consciousness. A seemingly parochial toxic waste incident became part of a national phenomenon. The Smarden incident was considered to be indicative of the toxic hazards, which were borne of technocracy. It highlighted the inadequacies of existent concepts and practices for dealing with such hazards. As such, it was part of the fracturing of the consensus of progress: it made disagreements in expertise publicly visible. By the completion of the episode, ten different governmental ministries were involved. Douglas Good, a local veterinary surgeon, helped to effect the ‘reception’ of Silent Spring in the UK by telling the ‘Smarden story’ through local and national media and through the publications of anti- statist organizations. Keywords: pesticides; Smarden; Rachel Carson; expertise; environmentalism; pollution Long shadows fell over the village and over the people who lived there. There was, for one thing, the shadow of the ‘boffins’ who descended on the place, lifting samples of earth and departing in haste for London: there was the shadow cast by the bowler-hats of three different Ministries …, hats belonging to important- looking men who would neither confirm nor deny the wild rumours that were everywhere.