Race, Citizenship, & Reconstructing Cherokee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Race, Citizenship, & Reconstructing Cherokee University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1-1-2012 Maintaining Intact Our Homogeneousness: Race, Citizenship, & Reconstructing Cherokee Rachel Purvis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Purvis, Rachel, "Maintaining Intact Our Homogeneousness: Race, Citizenship, & Reconstructing Cherokee" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1415. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1415 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “‘MAINTAINING INTACT OUR HOMOGENOUSNESS’: RACE, CITIZENSHIP, & RECONSTRUCTING CHEROKEE.” A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in the Department of History The University of Mississippi by RACHEL SMITH PURVIS August 2012 Copyright Rachel Smith Purvis 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT The history of the Cherokee Nation from 1866 to 1907 provides a new framework for the story of Reconstruction that expands the periodization and geographical scope of the effects of the postwar period on both mainstream America and those regulated to its margins. Although the historical narrative marks the end of Reconstruction with the political compromise of 1877, the process continued in the Cherokee Nation until Oklahoma statehood was achieved in 1907. The Cherokee Nation serves as a window of analysis that demonstrates how the process of Reconstruction was a national phenomenon. The experience of the Cherokee people and their leaders during Reconstruction bridges the gap between the historiography of the postwar period and the postwar conquest of the west, and also contributes to recent works detailing the centrality of race and slavery to the lives of nineteenth-century southeastern Indians. This dissertation project strives to contribute to the story of the struggle of the Cherokee to negotiate their place within the postwar United States through an examination of the problems of freedom unleashed in the Cherokee Nation with emancipation. Investigations of the relevant secondary literature combined with an analysis of personal correspondence, governmental reports and letters from the holdings of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Cherokee laws, Cherokee leaders’ correspondence, and Cherokee Nation protests and memorials against federal government intervention in their affairs discussed in this project reveals that the Cherokee adapted the prevailing racial classifications of nineteenth-century America in an effort to use these categories of difference to assert their uniqueness and ii independence as a sovereign and legitimate nation. Chapter one examines the Treaty of 1866 with an analysis of the document and its many stipulations. The second chapter looks at the struggle of Cherokee leaders to defeat numerous bills introduced in Congress to extend federal control over Indian Territory. Chapter three explores the important and contentious issue of Cherokee citizenship and its connection to native sovereignty. The final chapter reveals that federal protection of Cherokee freedmen continued beyond the official end of Reconstruction. iii DEDICATION This dissertation project is dedicated to my family who wholeheartedly supported my academic endeavors. In particular, I want to thank my parents for their encouragement throughout my graduate training, as well as my husband for his constant belief in my ability to succeed. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my advisors, Drs. John Neff and Robbie Ethridge and my committee members, Drs. Shelia Skemp and Anne Twitty. My research could not have been completed without the assistantship provided by the Department of History. In addition, the McMinn Dissertation Fellowship awarded by The Center for Civil War Research as well as the J.L. & Diane Holloway Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship in the Humanities awarded by the University of Mississippi Graduate School were generous sources of support for my dissertation project. Lastly, I want to thank my writing group, composed of Audrey Uffner and Benjamin Purvis, for seeing this through to the end with me. It was quite an adventure. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………… ii DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………………. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………………………… v INTRODUCTION:………………………………………………………………………..……. 1 CHAPTER ONE: “THE RECONSTRUCTION TREATY OF 1866: IMPORTANCE, IMPACT, & LEGACY”………………………………………………………………………….……….. 31 CHAPTER TWO: “THE CHEROKEE NATION IN THE 1870S: FIGHT TO RETAIN INDIAN TERRITORY”………………………………………………………………………...……….. 79 CHAPTER THREE: “EMANCIPATION, CITIZENSHIP, AND RECONSTRUCTING CHEROKEE”……………………………………………………………………….……….....131 CHAPTER FOUR: “CHEROKEE FREEDMEN CHALLENGES TO RACIAL EXCLUSION”……………………………………………………………………….………... 156 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………….…….... 211 VITA…………………………………………………………………………………………... 220 vi INTRODUCTION: The history of the Cherokee Nation from 1866 to 1907 provides a new framework for the story of Reconstruction. An examination of the process of Reconstruction in the Cherokee Nation expands the periodization and geographical scope of the effects of the postwar period on both mainstream America and those regulated to its margins. Although the historical narrative marks the official end of Reconstruction with the political compromise of 1877, the process continued in the Cherokee Nation until Oklahoma statehood was achieved in 1907. The Cherokee Nation serves as a window of analysis that demonstrates how the process of Reconstruction was a national phenomenon that involved more than the reunification of north and south and blacks and whites. When viewed through the history of the Cherokee Nation, Reconstruction is a process of reuniting the union and incorporating the west and its inhabitants into the American nation. Cherokee leaders struggled to preserve the sovereignty of their “dependent, domestic nation” in the face of a stronger federal government committed to rebuilding and uniting the country on its own terms. In fact, a close examination of the congressional actions debated for Indian Territory in 1865 reveals that the new power of a reunited United States government was felt first in native nations. Native Americans are often marginalized in the historical narrative, especially in discussions of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Scholars have worked to show the crucial importance natives played in contesting the expansion of colonial America, and later in resisting 1 American removal efforts. Most textbooks reflect the influence of this scholarly attempt to broaden our understanding of the interactions of diverse racial groups in colonial America. But, Native Americans fall out of the national story after the removal period of the 1830s, and they often do not reappear until after the Civil War when the United States began to subdue Plains tribes and consolidate the west. In examining the history of the Cherokee Nation after the war, it becomes clear that the experience of the Cherokee people and their leaders during Reconstruction bridges the gap between the historiography of the postwar period and the postwar conquest of the west, and also contributes to recent works detailing the centrality of race and slavery to the lives of nineteenth-century southeastern Indians. When the history of the Cherokee is understood within the context of the Civil War and the subsequent national reconstruction it demonstrates the importance of race to late-nineteenth century America’s national development. The intersection of racism and Indian nationalism is often unexplored in both Reconstruction history and Native American history. This dissertation project strives to contribute to the story of the struggle of the Cherokee and their freedpeople to negotiate their place within the postwar United States through an investigation of the problems of freedom unleashed in the Cherokee Nation with emancipation. It asserts that when the intersection of racism and Indian nationalism in the postwar Cherokee Nation are considered it is possible to see how the chaotic and disruptive process of Reconstruction reached across all regions of the country and greatly affected all groups striving to rebuild their communities and societies after the trauma of war. The conventional framework of the historical narrative of this period should be expanded to include the story of groups like the Cherokee because it provides a more complicated and nuanced picture of the Reconstruction process. 2 Most recent studies of the postwar period have focused on the effects of emancipation on American society, but the problems of freedom in the Cherokee Nation have not been thoroughly examined. The destruction of slavery and the Fourteenth Amendment meant Americans had to confront the challenge of incorporating four million formerly enslaved people as citizens of the body politic. The Cherokee Nation also faced this challenge after the war, but issues arising from emancipation in Indian Territory quickly became entwined with the postwar sovereignty struggle between Cherokee leaders and federal officials. The war made the union of the states permanent and federal authority sovereign, and the formerly rebellious states were compelled to seek readmission
Recommended publications
  • Teaching American Indian History with Primary Sources Popovi Da, the Great Pueblo Artist, Was Quizzed One Day on Why the Indians
    In partnership with The Organization of American Historians/National Park Service Northeast Region History Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior December 2020 Teaching American Indian History with Primary Sources Popovi Da, the great Pueblo artist, was quizzed one day on why the Indians were the first ones on this continent. “We had reservations,” was his reply. Another time, when questioned by an anthropologist on what the Indians called America before the white man came, an Indian said simply, “Ours.” … Some years ago at a Congressional hearing someone asked Alex Chasing Hawk, a council member of the Cheyenne River Sioux for thirty years, “Just what do you Indians want?” Alex replied, “A leave-us-alone law!!” –— Vine Deloria Jr., Custer Died for Your Sins (1988) 4 Contents Acknowledgments. 8 A Note on the Names of Indian Nations . 9 A Note to Educators . .10 Suggested Classroom Strategies . .11 A Brief Timeline of the History of Indian Nations in North America . .16 CHAPTER 1 Identity: Stereotypes and Choices. 20 What Is Identity?. 20 Exercises. 22 Exercise 1.1: Wheel of Identity . .22 Exercise 1.2: Venn Diagram of Identity . .23 Exercise 1.3: Stereotypes. 24 Readings Reading 1.1: How Are Stereotypes Created?. 25 Reading 1.2: Mascots and Stereotypes . .29 Reading 1.3: “I’m Not the Indian You Had in Mind”. 35 Reading 1.4: Names Matter. 36 CHAPTER 2 God, Greed, and Violence: Colonialism . .39 Settler Colonialism. 42 Colonialism and Its Critics . .44 Readings Reading 2.1: Who “Owns” America? The Doctrine of Discovery . .45 Reading 2.2: Creed or Greed? .
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Vol
    DECEMBER 2020 VOL. 76, NO. 12 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE MUNICIP S AL A L S E N A A G K U R E A G E R ARK ANSAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE T GREAT CITIES MAKE A GREAT STATE E A A T T S C T I A TI E ES GR MAKE A ON THE COVER—A volunteer at the Arkansas Foodbank preps canned goods for delivery to the hundreds of community pantries and shelters it serves in 33 counties. The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically increased food insecurity and the need for assistance. Learn about the Foodbank, its local partners and how your city or town can get involved inside on page 20. Read Cover photo by Ben Cline. also about Sherwood Council Member and League District 2 Vice President Beverly Williams, the expanding industry at the Port of Little Rock and the state’s strategy for mitigating the ongo- ing pandemic through the winter months, all inside. And don’t forget: The 2021 Virtual Winter Conference is quickly approaching, and there is no registration fee. Check out the tentative agenda on page 38.—atm Features City & Town Contents Respect guides League District 2 vice Arkansas Municipal League Officers .........5 16 president Respectful leadership and doing your homework are Community Development .......................52 two essential qualities for League 2020-2021 District 2 Vice President and Sherwood Council Member Beverly COVID-19 Resources ............................34 Williams, who strives to maintain her city’s unique Engineering ..........................................60 spirit while accommodating impressive growth. From the Desk of the Executive Director .....6 Arkansas Foodbank answers the call as Meeting Calendar .................................12 20 hunger rises in communities Food insecurity has increased in cities and towns Municipal Mart .....................................70 across our state during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Arkansas Foodbank has ramped up its efforts to Municipal Notes ...................................12 work with its many local partners to ensure healthy meals reach those most in need.
    [Show full text]
  • The Free State of Winston"
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2019 Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston" Susan Neelly Deily-Swearingen University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Deily-Swearingen, Susan Neelly, "Rebel Rebels: Race, Resistance, and Remembrance in "The Free State of Winston"" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 2444. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2444 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REBEL REBELS: RACE, RESISTANCE, AND REMEMBRANCE IN THE FREE STATE OF WINSTON BY SUSAN NEELLY DEILY-SWEARINGEN B.A., Brandeis University M.A., Brown University M.A., University of New Hampshire DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May 2019 This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, J. William Harris, Professor of History Jason Sokol, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History and History Graduate Program Director Gregory McMahon, Professor of Classics Victoria E. Bynum, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History, Texas State University, San Marcos On April 18, 2019 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Extension Publication [Serial]
    University of North Carolina Library Studies Number 2 ORTH CAROLINA FICTION 1734-1957 An Annotated Bibliography 1958 University of North Carolina Library Studies Number 2 NORTH CAROLINA FICTION 17344957 An Annotated Bibliography Prepared by the Joint Committee On North Carolina Literature and Bibliography of The North Carolina English Teachers Association and The North Carolina Library Association UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA LIBRARY STUDIES No. 1 North Carolina County Histories, A Bibliography, by William S. Powell, 1958 No. 2 North Carolina Fiction, 1734-1957: An Annotated Bibliography, by a Joint Committee of the North Carolina English Teachers Association and the North Carolina Library Association, 1958 NORTH CAROLINA LITERATURE SERIES in Library Extension Publications 1949 John Charles McNeill, North Carolina Poet, 1874-1907, a Bio- graphical Sketch, by Agatha Boyd Adams 1949 North Carolina Writers [a study outline], by Walter Spearman 1950 Thomas Wolfe: Carolina Student, a Brief Biography, by Agatha Boyd Adams 1951 Paul Green of Chapel Hill, by Agatha Boyd Adams, edited by Richard Walser 1952 Inglis Fletcher of Bandon Plantation, by Richard Walser 1952 North Carolina Authors: a Selective Handbook 1954 Frederick H. Koch: a Short Biography, by Samuel Selden and Mary T. Sphangos 1955 Bernice Kelly Harris, by Richard Walser 1956 North Carolina Musicians 1957 O. Henry in North Carolina, by Cathleen Pike Imaginary landing of a ballonist near Salem in 1789. See No. 528. NORTH CAROLINA FICTION 1734-1957 An Annotated Bibliography William S. Powell Editor CHAPEL HILL THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA LIBRARY 1958 Copyright 1958 by The University of North Carolina Library JOINT COMMITTEE fFlorence Blakely, Duke University Library Grace S.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of the Capitol 2009-June 2010 Report
    Friends of the Capitol 2009-June 2010 Report Our Mission Statement: Friends of the Capitol is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation that is devoted to maintaining and improving the beauty and grandeur of the Oklahoma State Capitol building and showcasing the magnificent gifts of art housed inside. This mission is accomplished through a partnership with private citizens wishing to leave their footprint in our state's rich history. Education and Development In 2009 and 2010 Friends of the Capitol (FOC) participated in several educational and developmental projects informing fellow Oklahomans of the beauty of the capitol and how they can participate in the continuing renovations of Oklahoma State Capitol building. In March of 2010, FOC representatives made a trip to Elk City and met with several organizations within the community and illustrated all the new renovations funded by Friends of the Capitol supporters. Additionally in 2009 FOC participated in the State Superintendent’s encyclo-media conference and in February 2010 FOC participated in the Oklahoma City Public Schools’ Professional Development Day. We had the opportunity to meet with teachers from several different communities in Oklahoma, and we were pleased to inform them about all the new restorations and how their school’s name can be engraved on a 15”x30”paver, and placed below the Capitol’s south steps in the Centennial Memorial Plaza to be admired by many generations of Oklahomans. Gratefully Acknowledging the Friends of the Capitol Board of Directors Board Members Ex-Officio Paul B. Meyer, Col. John Richard Chairman USA (Ret.) MA+ Architecture Oklahoma Department Oklahoma City of Central Services Pat Foster, Vice Chairman Suzanne Tate Jim Thorpe Association Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 800.438.1601
    Cherokee Welcome Center VisitCherokeeNC.com 800.438.1601 Oconaluftee Indian Village, “ Unto These Hills” Outdoor Drama VisitCherokeeNC.com 866.554.4557 Fisheries & Wildlife Management FishCherokee.com 828.554.6110 Museum of the Cherokee Indian CherokeeMuseum.org 828.497.3481 Sequoyah National Golf Club SequoyahNational.com 828.497.3000 Qualla Arts and Crafts Mutual, Inc. QuallaArtsAndCrafts.com 828.497.3103 VisitCherokeeNC.com | 800.438.1601 This is what Chapter II: Strangers I was told In 1540, Spanish explorer and conquistador Hernando de perception of the region. Peace made Soto came through here looking for gold, demanding food, alliances irrelevant and mounting when I was young. fighting, enslaving—despite what you may have heard, he pressure from land speculators made wasn’t a great guy. Worse were the diseases that came with the Cherokees an inconvenience. Cherokees begin a story the way their people have him. Lacking the immunity to combat these afflictions, In 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the for generations. It’s only fitting to start the story of indigenous peoples were nearly eradicated, victim to Indian Removal Act offering the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians the same way. plagues such as smallpox, measles, and influenza. territory out west in exchange for Chapter I: A Long Time Ago Nevertheless, the Cherokees continued their homeland. Five years later came the to work through diplomacy with the Treaty of New Echota, which ceded to the The Cherokees were hunters and gatherers, foraging newcomers for the next 200 years. federal government most of the Cherokee lands the Great Smoky Mountains and the lowlands east of the Mississippi, resulting in what is now By the late eighteenth century, seventy-five percent of the Southern Appalachians for food while referred to as the “Trail of Tears.” of Cherokee land had been lost through treaties with hunting, fishing, and trapping game.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailword.Pdf
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. _X___ New Submission ____ Amended Submission ======================================================================================================= A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ======================================================================================================= Historic and Historical Archaeological Resources of the Cherokee Trail of Tears ======================================================================================================= B. Associated Historic Contexts ======================================================================================================= (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) See Continuation Sheet ======================================================================================================= C. Form Prepared by =======================================================================================================
    [Show full text]
  • (Title 17, US Code). Any Copies of P
    Notice of Copyright Published and unpublished materials may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code). Any copies of published and unpublished materials provided by the Western History Collections are for research, scholarship, and study purposes only. Use of certain published materials and manuscripts is restricted by law, by reason of their origin, or by donor agreement. For the protection of its holdings, the Western History Collections also reserves the right to restrict the use of unprocessed materials, or books and documents of exceptional value and fragility. Use of any material is subject to the approval of the Curator. Citing Resources from the Western History Collections For citations in published or unpublished papers, this repository should be listed as the Western History Collections, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. An example of a proper citation: Oklahoma Federation of Labor Collection, M452, Box 5, Folder 2. Western History Collections, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma. BREWER, OLIVER HAZARD PBRHY, JB. OLIVER HAZARD PERRY HOUR. \ \ INDEX IARDS Brewer, Oliver Hazard Perry Brewer, John Taylor, Elizabeth " Schools—Cherokee Hation Calif ami t gold rush—Cherokees Vann, Delia A. Vann, Joseph Slaves—Cherokee Brewer"1 s Bend Commnlty Brewer, Mary Vann Brewer, John D. Brewer, Thomas Henry Brewer, Cherry J. Culture—Cherokee Nation Wealthy Indians ©-Cherokee Ciril Wear—Cherokee Ration Civil Bar refugee6-~Sbntbfc«n Coodey, Daniel Ross ^en, Robert ^. Spears, L. pt Buohyhead, Dennie W« \ Cherokee Strip Lire Stock jLsaociatLon Ranohing^ChexDkee Nation \ Taxes—Ch«rokea \ ItoaiifiA—Chero kee x Law enforcement—Cherokee \ BREWER, OUTOR HAZAHD FERRY, JB» , ifcOTR HAZABD P«fe OBffSB.
    [Show full text]
  • John-Ross-Decision-Of-1861.Pdf
    JOHN ROSS'S DECISION In the spring and early summer of 1861 Ross counseled neutrality, not just for the Cherokees, but for all the tribes of Indian Territory. As the summer drew to a close, Ross, subjected to tremendous pressures from inside and outside the Cherokee Na­ tion, realized the impossibility of that stance. Facing his as­ sembled people, he expounded on the validity of both the Union and Confederate causes. He acknowledged the importance of the Cherokees' treaty with the federal government in whose hands lay the tribe's trust funds. The tribe's policy of neutrality seemed successful to that point, but Ross addressed his greatest concern, the unity of the Cherokee Nation, with the following words: The great object with me has been to have the Cherokee people harmonious and united in the full and free exercise and enjoyment of all of their rights of person and property. Union is strength, dissension is weakness, misery ruin! In time of peace together! in time of war, if war must come, fight together. 2 His speech contained no surprises and nothing indicated what was to follow. Ross concluded: The permanent disruption ofthe United States into two governments is now probable. The State [Arkansas] on our border and the Indian nations about us have severed their connection from the United States and joined the Confederate States. Our general interest is inseparable from theirs and it is not desirable that we should stand alone. The preservation of our rights and of our existence are above every other consideration. Deadly Currents
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Sense of Communityamong the Capital City Cherokees
    CREATING A SENSE OF COMMUNITYAMONG THE CAPITAL CITY CHEROKEES by Pamela Parks Tinker A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Interdisciplinary Studies Committee: ____________________________________ Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Program Director ____________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date:________________________________ Spring 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Creating a Sense Of Community Among Capital City Cherokees A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Interdisciplinary Studies at George Mason University By Pamela Parks Tinker Bachelor of Science Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University 1975 Director: Meredith H. Lair, Professor Department of History Spring Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Copyright 2016 Pamela Parks Tinker All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements Thanks to the Capital City Cherokee Community for allowing me to study the formation of the community and for making time for personal interviews. I am grateful for the guidance offered by my Thesis Committee of three professors. Thesis Committee Chair, Professor Maria Dakake, also served as my advisor over a period of years in planning a course of study that truly has been interdisciplinary. It has been a joyful situation to be admitted to a variety of history, religion and spirituality, folklore, ethnographic writing, and research courses under the umbrella of one Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies program. Much of the inspiration for this thesis occurred at George Mason University in Professor Debra Lattanzi Shutika’s Folklore class on “Sense of Place” in which the world of Ethnography opened up for me.
    [Show full text]
  • POSTAL BULLET7N PUMJSWD SINM MARCH 4,1880 PB 21850-Svnmhii 16,1993 OCT 1 11993
    P 1.3: 21850 POSTAL BULLET7N PUMJSWD SINM MARCH 4,1880 PB 21850-SvnMHii 16,1993 OCT 1 11993 CONTENTS f«^e I |i pr-s«s Risip^/f^? y M ^&k fiip^fE^rl |! I! H |Nft Wif Treasury Department Checks Administrative Services ^^^OO^S^D October Social Security benefit checks nor- 1994 Year Type for Hand Stamp and Canceling Machines 2 ' Credit Card Policies and Procedures (Handbook AS-709 Revision) 2 mal|Y delivered on the third of the month are Issuance of Management Instructions 1 scheduled for delivery on Friday, October 1. The Customer Services envelopes will bear the legend: AIDS Awareness Postage Stamp 6 Postmaster: Requested delivery date is Customer Satisfaction Posters and Standup Talks 9 ^ _»u Mai) A|ert ;, 8 tne 1st daY of tne month. Missing Children Poster 37 Civil Service annuity and Railroad Retirement National Consumers Week 3 checks are scheduled for delivery on the normal Treasury Department Checks 1 . ,. x _.. _ A . * , Domestic Mail delivery date, Friday, October 1. The envelopes Authorizations to Prepare Mail on Pallets (Correction) 15 wil1bea r the legend: Conditions Applied to Mail Addressed to Military Post Offices Overseas 16 Postmaster: Requested delivery date is Express Mail Security Measures,(DMMT Correction) 12 the 1 st day of the month or Flat Mail Barcodmg—85 Percent Qualification 13 ' Metered Stamp Barcode Errors 13 the first delivery date there- Postage Stamp Conversions (DMM Revision) 11 after. Revised Post Office to Addressee Express Mail Label 14 Soda| Securjt benefjt checks are ^^^^ Special Cancellations 13 ' United States Navy: Change in Mailing Status 10 for delivery on the normal delivery date, Fnday, Fraud Alerts October 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw and Creek Removals
    Chapter 6 Choctaw and Creek Removals The idea of indian removal as a government obligation first reared its head in 1802 when officials of the state of Georgia made an agreement with federal government officials. In the Georgia Compact, the state of Georgia gave up its claims to territorial lands west of that state in exchange for $1,250,000 and a promise that the federal government would abolish Indian title to Georgia lands as soon as possible. How seriously the government took its obligation to Georgia at the time of the agreement is unknown. The following year, however, the Louisiana Purchase was made, and almost immedi- ately, the trans-Mississippi area was seen by some as the answer to “The Indian Problem.” Not everyone agreed. Some congress- men argued that removal to the West was impractical because of land-hungry whites who could not be restrained from crossing the mighty river to obtain land. Although their conclusion was correct, it was probably made more in opposition to President Jefferson than from any real con- cern about the Indians or about practicality. Although some offers were made by government officials to officials of various tribes, little Pushmataha, Choctaw was done about removing the southeastern tribes before the War of 1812. warrior During that war several Indian tribes supported the British. After the war ended, many whites demanded that tribal lands be confiscated by Removals 67 the government as punishment for Indians’ treasonous activities. Many Americans included all tribes in their confiscationdemands , evidently feeling that all Indians were guilty, despite the fact that many tribes did not participate in the war.
    [Show full text]