DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport Layout Plan Marion Municipal Airport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport Layout Plan Marion Municipal Airport Narrative Report for AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN for the MARION MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 2017 SPECIAL NOTE AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMITTEE John Bender Nathan Caraway Phil High Leah Rodenberg Brian Rosteck Bonnie Roth Tim Shaffer Frank Sherman Jeff Stone Mike Tope MAYOR Nicolas Abouassaly CITY COUNCIL Kim Etzel Joe Spinks Will Brandt Randy Strnad Mary Lou Pazour Paul Draper PREPARED BY 4001 River Ridge Dr. NE Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 Phone: 319-377-4629 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE - EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 1 IOWA AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN ................................................................................................................ 2 Airport System Stratification ............................................................................................................... 2 NATIONAL PLAN OF INTEGRATED AIRPORT SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 5 AIRPORT SIGNIFICANCE .......................................................................................................................... 6 AIRPORT SETTING ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Location ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Airport History ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Climate ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Local Ordinances ................................................................................................................................ 8 Neighboring Airports ........................................................................................................................... 8 SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................. 10 Population .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Employment ....................................................................................................................................... 11 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 13 SECTION TWO - CURRENT AND PROJECTED AVIATION ACTIVITY ................................................................. 15 FORECASTING APPROACH .................................................................................................................... 15 DESIGNATING A FORECAST MODEL ...................................................................................................... 15 AIR TRAFFIC ACTIVITY ............................................................................................................................. 16 Based Aircraft..................................................................................................................................... 16 Aircraft Operations and Operational Fleet Mix ............................................................................. 18 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 20 SECTION THREE – FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................ 21 CRITICAL AIRCRAFT AND REFERENCE CODE ........................................................................................ 21 AIRSIDE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 23 Airfield Capacity ............................................................................................................................... 23 Runway Orientation .......................................................................................................................... 23 Runway Length and Width ............................................................................................................... 24 Pavement Strength ........................................................................................................................... 25 Landing and Safety Devices ............................................................................................................ 26 Navigational Aids ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 Global Positioning Systems ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Visual Glide Path Indicator ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Runway Identification Lighting ................................................................................................................................. 27 Wind Direction and Weather Reporting ................................................................................................................ 27 LANDSIDE REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 28 Aircraft Apron and Parking .............................................................................................................. 28 Hangars ............................................................................................................................................... 29 General Aviation Terminal ................................................................................................................ 29 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 30 SECTION FOUR – ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................................... 31 STAKEHOLDER/PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 31 DO NOTHING ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................... 31 ALTERNATIVE SITES .................................................................................................................................. 32 SERVICE FROM ANOTHER AIRPORT........................................................................................................ 32 DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES AT THE EXISTING SITE ............................................................................ 32 i EXISTING RUNWAY EXTENSION .............................................................................................................. 32 Runway Extension to the North ........................................................................................................................ 33 Runway Extension to the South ....................................................................................................................... 33 Alternate North-South Alignment ................................................................................................................... 34 CROSS WIND RUNWAY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................. 34 East-West Cross Wind Runway #1 ................................................................................................................... 34 East-West Cross Wind Runway #2 ................................................................................................................... 35 TERMINAL AREA DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................. 35 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 38 SECTION FIVE – AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN ............................................................................................................. 39 CURRENT RUNWAY/ULTIMATE PRIMARY RUNWAY ................................................................................ 39 CROSS WIND RUNWAY ........................................................................................................................... 39 TERMINAL AREA ...................................................................................................................................... 39 AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE .................................................................................................................... 40 SECTION SIX – IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .............................................................................................................. 41 DEVELOPMENT PHASES ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 89/Tuesday, May 8, 2018/Proposed
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules 20743 of this AD following Bombardier Learjet 60 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION information on the availability of this SB 60–27–39 Recommended, Basic Issue, material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. dated September 11, 2017. Federal Aviation Administration Examining the AD Docket (i) No Reporting Requirement 14 CFR Part 39 You may examine the AD docket on Although Bombardier Learjet 28/29 SB 28/ the internet at http:// 29–27–31 Recommended, dated September [Docket No. FAA–2018–0396; Product www.regulations.gov by searching for 11, 2017; Bombardier Learjet 31 SB 31–27– Identifier 2017–NM–156–AD] and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 35 Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; RIN 2120–AA64 0396; or in person at the Docket Bombardier Learjet 35/36 SB 35/36 -27–50 Management Facility between 9 a.m. Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; Airworthiness Directives; Airbus and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, Bombardier Learjet 55 SB 55–27–41 Airplanes except Federal holidays. The AD docket Recommended, dated September 11, 2017; contains this NPRM, the regulatory and Bombardier Learjet 60 SB 60–27–39 AGENCY: Federal Aviation evaluation, any comments received, and Recommended, Revision 1, dated January 15, Administration (FAA), DOT. other information. The street address for 2018, all specify to submit a compliance ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking the Docket Operations office (telephone response form to the manufacturer per (NPRM). 800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES paragraph 3.E., this AD does not require that section.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 89/Tuesday, May 8, 2018/Proposed
    20740 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 8, 2018 / Proposed Rules (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION www.regulations.gov by searching for Necessity of Information) because in the and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– course of investigations into potential Federal Aviation Administration 0327; or in person at Docket Operations violations of federal law, the accuracy of between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday information obtained or introduced 14 CFR Part 39 through Friday, except Federal holidays. occasionally may be unclear, or the The AD docket contains this NPRM, the information may not be strictly relevant or [Docket No. FAA–2018–0327; Product Identifier 2018–CE–001–AD] regulatory evaluation, any comments necessary to a specific investigation. In the received, and other information. The interests of effective law enforcement, it is RIN 2120–AA64 street address for Docket Operations appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful Airworthiness Directives; Learjet, Inc. (phone: 800–647–5527) is listed above. activity. Airplanes Comments will be available in the AD (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of docket shortly after receipt. Information from Individuals) because AGENCY: Federal Aviation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara requiring that information be collected from Administration (FAA), DOT. Shawn, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita the subject of an investigation would alert the ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking ACO Branch, 1801 Airport Road, Room subject to the nature or existence of the (NPRM). 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: investigation, thereby interfering with that (316) 946–4141; fax: (316) 946–4107; investigation and related law enforcement SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new email: [email protected] or Wichita- activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated 5.6.15
    UPDATED 5.6.15 1 Built 1945 Type 35 Airframe used for fatigue testing and not flown, presumed unregistered 2 Built 1945 Type 35 Airframe used for fatigue testing and not flown, presumed unregistered 3 Built 1945 Type 35 Regd. NX80150 Beech Aircraft Corporation, Wichita, Kansas Registered between mid-November 1945 & mid-January 1946 Made the first flight on 22 December 1945 with Vern L Carston in control. Used a 125hp Lycoming G-0290A engine and was fitted with a laminar flow wing Current in the 1947 edition (correct to September 1946) of the ‘Official U.S. Directory of Aircraft Owners’ as owned by Beech Aircraft Corp., Wichita, Kansas and being built 12.45 with a Lycoming O-290-A engine of 125hp. Crashed & written-off during spinning trials cc by 1.7.64 3 NX80150 (Aeroplane via Jack Meaden) 4 Built 1945 Type 35 Regd. NX80040 Beech Aircraft Corporation, Wichita, Kansas As per aircraft record card Was fitted with a Continental engine and a NACA23000 wing Regd. NC80040 Regd. N80040 cc by 1.7.64 On display as N80040 in the National Air & Space Museum, Garber Facility, Silver Hill, Maryland. Often referred to as D-4, which is incorrect. Will move to Steven Udvar-Hazy Center, Chantilly, Virginia in 2007 4 NX80040 In test colours (Flying 1947) Flying Magazine cover December 1947 (Bill Larkins) (Bill Larkins) 4 N80040 4 September 1949 4 N80040 On display in the Smithsonian Institute (W Steeneck via John Wegg) 5 Built 1945 Type 35 Airframe used for fatigue testing and not flown, presumed unregistered Other versions of the story have that two of these aircraft are NX80300 (which made the first flight on 22.12.45 (incorrect) and is D-1 and NX80301 which is possibly D-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications to Provide Airport Services TABLE of CONTENTS Related to the Development of a Regional Class C Airport
    CONSULTANT INFORMATION | 1 INTRODUCTION Snyder & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications to provide airport services TABLE OF CONTENTS related to the development of a regional class C airport. 1. CONSULTANT INFORMATION 1 The Request for Qualifications issued by the South 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF KEY PERSONNEL 8 Central Regional Airport Agency (SCRAA) sets forth the 3. CAPABILITIES, KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE 17 following objectives: Airport Site Selection Airport Layout Plan and Narrative/Master Plan Environmental Documentation and Mitigation Land Acquisition Preliminary and final design associated with the construction of runways, taxiways, aprons, landing and navigational aids. Preliminary and final design associated with the construction of aircraft storage facilities, fuel facilities, utilities, vehicle access and parking facilities, terminal building and other landside infrastructure improvements Obstruction mitigation ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Snyder & Associates, Inc. has assembled a team of highly qualified professionals to provide the SCRAA with the technical expertise and public relations experience required to successfully complete the above referenced proejcts. The following organizational chart depicts how the team will interact with the governing bodies and stakeholders. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Scott Tener, FAA Planner for Iowa Donald Harper, P.E., Iowa Airport Engineer South Central Regional Airport Agency Iowa DOT Office of Aviation Michelle McEnany, Director Jim Hansen (chair),
    [Show full text]
  • IOWA AVIATION BULLETIN Annual Aviation Conference This Year’S Annual Aviation Conference Was a Huge Success
    Iowa Winter 2001-2002 Aviation Bulletin The Airport Support Network program Bob Dickens AOPA Midwest Regional Representative In October 1997 the Aircraft Owners One of the objectives of the ASN master plans and issues of compatible land and Pilots Association (AOPA) an- program is not only to place a monitor on- use. Support includes expert counsel on nounced the launching of the Airport site to report problems, but also to work strategy and tactics to handle airport Support Network (ASN) volunteer locally to detect and deal with potentially issues, and informational materials to program. At that juncture, general troublesome issues before they get out of build public understanding and acceptance aviation airports were closing at the rate control and threaten the airport’s exist- of community airports. of nearly one per week across the country. ence. AOPA members rank the defense and That rate has been slowed somewhat, but AOPA’s greatest strength is the vast preservation of general aviation airports as we continue to experience closures of number of pilots who band together under one of the most important jobs of the general aviation airports at an unaccept- the AOPA banner for a common purpose. Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. able rate. Airports are crucial to general Under the ASN concept, that strength will For complete information on the aviation’s continued viability and future be mobilized to expand our watch over the Airport Support Network refer to the growth. nation’s general aviation airports. AOPA Web site or contact your AOPA Often, the general aviation community Appointments to the AOPA’s ASN regional representative.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1St September 2019 to Monday, 30Th September 2019
    Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1st September 2019 to Monday, 30th September 2019 From Phoenix (PHX) To Phoenix (PHX) From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c Albany - Albany International Airport (ALB) Albany - Albany International Airport (ALB) - - 12345 - - 6:00a 3:35p UA1600 319 EWR 1:41p 2:29p UA4954* ERJ - - - - - - - 6 - 6:00a 9:26a DL2537 319 DTW 7:43a 8:20a DL2200 321 Operated By Commutair Dba United Express - - - - - - - 6 - 6:20a 3:16p DL1453 321 DTW 1:06p 1:45p DL3993* CR9 - - - - - - - - 7 6:05a 10:00a WN5338 73W BWI 7:25a 8:10a WN2856 73W Operated By Skywest Dba Delta Connection - - - - - - - 6 - 10:00a 7:51p AA0498 738 CLT 5:18p 5:50p AA4565* E75 - - - - - - - 6 - 6:14a 9:53a DL1450 717 MSP 7:57a 8:45a DL1874 321 Operated By Republic Airways as American Eagle - - 1234567 11:30a 9:09p UA1552 EQV EWR 7:00p 7:55p UA4944* ERJ - - 12345 - - 6:30a 10:05a WN0136 73W MDW 7:40a 8:25a WN1093 73H Operated By Commutair Dba United Express - - 12345 - 7 12:11p 10:26p AA0727 321 CLT 7:26p 8:24p AA4565* E75 - - 12345 - 7 7:50a 11:29a AA3207* CR7 ORD 9:12a 9:49a AA0866 738 Operated By Republic Airways as American Eagle Operated By Skywest Airlines as American Eagle - - 1234567 12:23p 9:48p AA0615 738 ORD 6:04p 6:39p AA3205* CR7 - - 1234567 8:20a 12:32p AA4868* ER4 PHL 9:32a 10:30a AA1970 321 Operated By Skywest Airlines as American Eagle Operated By Piedmont Airlines as American Eagle - - - - - - - 6 - 12:44p 9:53p DL1466 321 DTW 7:39p 8:30p DL1603
    [Show full text]
  • SSK 0980 Rev 1.Fm
    2b LEARJET 23/24/25, 28/29, 35/36 APPROVEDWHITEIN RT 0980 Revision Transmittal Sheet This page transmits Revision 1 to SSK 0980, “Replacement of Air Conditioning Evaporator Assembly”. Rework: No rework is required for aircraft which have complied with previous issues of this document. Summary: This revision adds clamp part number MS21919WDG20 as an alternate to MS21919DG20, removes the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly from the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kits, and adds the AN919-15D reducer to the 2499002-2 and -010 kits. The kit prices are updated. NOTE: Change bars are placed in the left margin of pages where significant changes are located. This revision incorporates the latest document format for Learjet service instructions. The general arrangement of this document may change from the previous issue. Description of Changes In the Planning Information section: Changed the Material Required information section as follows: Updated the 2499002-1 thru -010 kit pricing. In the Material Information section: Changed the 2499002-1 and -009 kit information as follows: Removed Model 25 aircraft serials that were never built, and removed reference to Model 25F. Changed the 2499002-1, -2, -3, -4, -009, and -010 kit information as follows: Added alternate part number clamp. Changed the 2499002-2, -3, -4, and -010 kit information as follows: Moved the 7600122-3 evaporator assembly to the “Other materials/parts necessary” table. Changed the 2499002-2 and -010 kit information as follows: Added the AN919-15D reducer. Filing Instructions: This is a COMPLETE revision. Remove and discard all pages of the prior issue and replace them with pages of Revision 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirmed Airlines and Airports Jumpstart® 2018
    Confirmed Airlines and Airports JumpStart® 2018 Confirmed Airlines Air Canada Onejet Alaska Airlines Public Charters dba Regional Sky Allegiant Airlines Republic Airways American Airlines Southern Airways Express Cape Air Southwest Airlines Contour Airlines Spirit Airlines Copa Airlines Sun Country Airlines Delta Air Lines Sunwing Airlines Enerjet Tropic Air First Air Tropic Ocean Airways Flair Air Ultimate Air Shuttle Frontier Airlines United Airlines Jetblue Airlines Via Airlines Jetlines WestJet JetSuiteX WOW Air Lufthansa Group Confirmed Airports ABE - Lehigh Valley International Airport BIS - Bismarck Municipal Airport ABI - Abilene Regional Airport BKG - Branson Airport ABQ - Albuquerque International Sunport BMI - Central Illinois Regional Airport ACK - Nantucket Memorial Airport BNA - Nashville International Airport ACV - Redwood Region Economic BOI - City of Boise Development BRO - Brownsville South Padre Island ACY - Atlantic City International Airport International Airport ALB - Albany County Airport Authority BTR - Baton Rouge Metro Airport AMA - Rick Husband Amarillo International BUF & IAG - Buffalo Niagara & Niagara Falls Airport Airports ANC - Anchorage International Airport BWI - Baltimore/Washington International ART - Watertown International Airport Airport ASE - Stay Aspen Snowmass CAE - Columbia Metropolitan Airport ATW - Appleton International Airport CAK - Akron-Canton Airport AUS - Austin-Bergstrom International Airport CCR - Contra Costa County Airports AVL - Asheville Regional Airport CHA - Chattanooga Airport
    [Show full text]
  • CID Unveils Health Screening Program Partnership with Mercy Medical Center
    For more information, contact: Pam Hinman Director of Marketing and Communications The Eastern Iowa Airport - CID Mobile: (319) 551-1490 Office: (319) 731-5719 [email protected] Karen Vander Sanden Public Relations Specialist II Mercy Cedar Rapids 319-398-6083, 319-558-8424 MEDIA RELEASE CID Unveils Health Screening Program Partnership with Mercy Medical Center For Immediate Release July 9, 2020 Cedar Rapids/Iowa City – The Eastern Iowa Airport – CID has unveiled a new health screening program that airport officials believe will serve as a guide for the national conversation on health screenings at airports. CID intends to partner with Mercy Medical Center – Cedar Rapids to deliver this first-of-its-kind program. On Thursday morning at a special commission meeting, Cedar Rapids Airport Commissioners heard details of the plan, presented by CID Director Marty Lenss and Dr. Timothy Sagers, COVID-19 clinical director, Mercy Medical Center. Lenss says the Travel Well program began to take shape in late March, a few weeks after the declaration of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Following multiple reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as well as state and local health officials about the global nature of the virus and the need to restrict travel, testing and health screening options became a regular part of the national and global discussion. CID plans to implement this year-long program as a proof of concept – to provide robust and efficient screenings, conducted by Mercy Medical Center professionals. This pre-flight health screening would be required for all passengers departing on a flight out of CID as well as employees who work beyond the security checkpoint, called the sterile area.
    [Show full text]
  • [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/08/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-09600, and on FDsys.gov [4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2018-0327; Product Identifier 2018-CE-001-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Learjet, Inc. Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Learjet, Inc. Models 28, 29, 31, 31A, 35, 35A, 36, 36A, 55, 55B, 55C, and 60 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by fatigue cracks initiating in the flap support structure due to repetitive flap loads, which has caused flap nose roller support bracket failure. This proposed AD would require replacement of the flap nose roller fitting, nose roller support bracket, and adjacent rib support structure with more robust components. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202-493-2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020.1 1 Date: 7 August 2020 RVSM MONITORING GROUPS AND
    RVSM MONITORING GROUPS AND MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS AS OF: 7 August 2020 Version: 2020.1 1. UPDATE OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TABLE AND WEBSITE. As significant data is obtained, monitoring requirements for specific aircraft types may change. When Table 1 below, is updated, a letter will be distributed by the Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMAs) to the States concerned. The updated table will be posted on the RMA website being maintained by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The secure website address is: http://portal.icao.int 2. INITIAL MONITORING. All operators that operate or intend to operate in airspace where RVSM is applied are required to participate in the RVSM monitoring program. Table 1 establishes requirements for initial monitoring associated with the RVSM approval process. In their application to the appropriate State authority for RVSM approval, operators must show a plan for meeting the applicable initial monitoring requirements. 3. AIRCRAFT STATUS FOR MONITORING. Aircraft engineering work that is required for the aircraft to receive RVSM airworthiness approval must be completed prior to the aircraft being monitored. Any exception to this rule will be coordinated with the State authority. 4. APPLICABILITY OF MONITORING FROM OTHER REGIONS. Monitoring data obtained in conjunction with RVSM monitoring programs from other regions can be used to meet regional monitoring requirements. The RMAs, which are responsible for administering the monitoring program, have access to monitoring data from other regions and will coordinate with States and operators to inform them on the status of individual operator monitoring requirements. 5. MONITORING PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF RVSM OPERATIONAL APPROVAL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Director
    Cedar Rapids Airport Commission Invites Application for Airport Director Executive Search Services Provided by ADK Executive Search The Airport The Eastern Iowa Airport (CID) is owned by the City of Cedar Rapids and operated autonomously by the Cedar Rapids Airport Commission. Five Commissioners are appointed to three-year terms by the Mayor and approved by the City Council. The Commission is a policy-making body and oversees Airport management. Commissioners serve on a volunteer basis. Current airlines and air cargo carriers: Regular Commission meetings are held on the fourth Monday Allegiant Air of each month. American Eagle CID is a 3,288 acre facility. The terminal opened in 1986, was expanded in 1996; and in 2009 the concourse underwent $2 Delta Connection million in improvements. The terminal has 106,480 usable United Express square feet; 13 aircraft gate positions; 2,400 public automobile parking spaces; concession services including food and Federal Express beverage, gifts, car rentals, shuttle service, information and United Parcel Service business services. Approximately 145 corporate and privately – owned aircraft are based at CID. DHL In Fiscal Year 2009, 473,463 passengers were enplaned; an estimated 57,700 operations were recorded; and 24,000 tons of cargo were handled. There are 38 Airport employees who serve the following areas: Administration, Maintenance (terminal and field) and Public Safety. In addition, there are more than 30 Airport tenants employing a total of 600 employees. The Fiscal Year 2010 Operating Budget is almost $12.5 million and the Five-year Capital Improvement Program Budget is $85.7 million. In Fiscal Year 2011, $1.7 million in terminal improvements will be completed, as will the final phase of the rehabilitation of CID’s primary runway 9/27.
    [Show full text]