DOCSLIB.ORG

Pecos National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pecos National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Pecos National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/951 ON THE COVER The last Spanish mission church at Pecos National Historical Park was completed by 1717 (view looking south). National Park Service photograph by Chris Dietrich (Resource Information Services Division). THIS PAGE Limestone of the Alamitos Formation crops out along the Pecos River. National Park Service photograph by Mario Armijo (Pecos National Historical Park). Pecos National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/951 Rebecca Port National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 April 2015 US Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. Printed copies of this report are produced in a limited quantity and they are only available as long as the supply lasts. This report is available from the Geologic Resources Inventory website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/inventory/ gre_publications.cfm) and the Natural Resource Publications Management website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/nrpm/). To receive this report in a format optimized for screen readers, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Port, R. 2015. Pecos National Historical Park: Geologic resources inventory report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/951. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 430/128395, April 2015 ii NPS Geologic Resources Division Contents Page List of Figures ................................................................................................................. v List of Tables .................................................................................................................. v Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... vii Products and Acknowledgments .................................................................................. x GRI Products ................................................................................................................................................................ x Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... x Geologic Setting and Significance ................................................................................ 1 Geologic Setting .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Geologic Significance and Connections to Park Stories ................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Features and Processes .................................................................................. 7 Geologic Foundation ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Sangre de Cristo Mountains ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Glorieta Pass .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Glorieta Mesa ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Fluvial Features .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Folds ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Faults......................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Slope Movements ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Paleontological Resources .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Caves and Karst Resources ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Earthquakes ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 Geologic Resources in a Cultural Context ................................................................................................................... 20 Geologic Resource Management Issues ..................................................................... 27 Fluvial Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 Water Quantity and Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Disturbed Land Restoration ........................................................................................................................................ 31 Abandoned Mineral Lands Hazards ............................................................................................................................ 32 Slope Movement Hazards and Risks ........................................................................................................................... 33 Paleontological Resource Inventory, Monitoring, and Protection ................................................................................. 34 Caves and Associated Landscape Management .......................................................................................................... 34 Land Subsidence ........................................................................................................................................................ 35 Earthquake Hazards and Risks .................................................................................................................................... 35 External Energy or Mineral Development .................................................................................................................... 35 Interpretation and Education ...................................................................................................................................... 35 Geologic History .......................................................................................................... 37 2,500 million–542 million years ago (Proterozoic Eon): Development of the Structural Foundation .............................. 37 542 million–252 million years ago (Paleozoic Era): Rise and Fall of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains .............................. 38 252 million–66 million years ago (Mesozoic Era): Sedimentary Basins .......................................................................... 40 The past 66 million years (Cenozoic Era): Mountain Building, Erosion, and Emergence of the Modern Landscape ........ 40 Geologic Map Data ...................................................................................................... 43 Geologic Maps .........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Late Paleozoic Tectonic and Sedimentologic History of the Penasco Uplift, North-Central New Mexico
    RICE UNIVERSITY LATE PALEOZOIC TECTONIC AND SEDIMENTOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE PENASCO UPLIFT, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO by ROY DONALD ADAMS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: 0^ (3- /jtd&i obfe B. Anderson, Chairman Assistant Professor pf Geology KT Rudy R. Schwarzer, Adjunct Assistant Professor of GSology John /E. Warme Professor of Geology Donald R. Baker Professor of Geology Houston, Texas May, 1980 ABSTRACT LATE PALEOZOIC TECTONIC AND SEDIMENTOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE PENASCO UPLIFT, NORTH-CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Roy Donald Adams The Paleozoic Peiiasco Uplift, located on the site of the present Nacimiento Mountains of north-central New Mexico, acted as a sediment source and modifier of regional sedimentation patterns from Middle Pennsylvanian to Early Permian time. The earliest history of the uplift is still poorly defined. Orogenic activity may have started as early as the Late Mississippian, or there may have been quiescence until after deposition of the Morrow-age Osha Canyon Formation and prior to deposition of the Atoka-age Sandia Formation. Coarse, arkosic siliciclastic sediments inter- bedded with fossilferious carbonates in the Madera Formation indicate that by early Desmoinesian time the Peiiasco Uplift had risen sufficiently to expose and erode Precambrian rocks. Paleotransport indicators in the arkosic sediments show transport away from the uplift. Throughout the remainder of the Pennsylvanian, the Peiiasco Uplift was a sediment source. The siliciclastic sediments derived from the Peiiasco Uplift formed a wedge that prograded out onto and interfingered with carbonate sediments of a shallow normal marine shelf. A change in paleotransport directions from northeasterly to southwesterly occurs on the east side of the Peiiasco Uplift and is due to the arrival of a flood of siliciclastic sediments derived from the Uncompahgre-San Luis Uplift to the northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Win the Battle, Lose the War
    BACKTALK Win the Battle, Lose the War eaders of my BackTalk columns will already know that I tion of their supply train checked the advance of the am a Civil War buff, and my recent move to New Mexico Confederate forces in New Mexico. Just as the Battle of broughtR new sites to explore. I did not realize that the West was Gettysburg was the high-water mark of the Confederacy, the Battle of the site of many important Civil War battles. In fact, within 60 Glorieta Pass was definitely the high-water mark of the Confederacy in miles of Albuquerque, the Battle of Glorieta Pass was fought. the Southwest. This little-known battle has been called the Gettysburg of the West. The Confederates’ lack of supplies eventually forced them to It was such an important Northern victory that it effectively sig- retreat, backtrack down the Rio Grande, and return to San naled the end of Confederate influence in the Southwest. Antonio. It is now recognized that the Battle of Glorieta Pass The Confederates were interested in the West. They wanted effectively stopped a Confederate invasion in the Southwest. The recognition by Mexico, and they also wanted the gold and silver battle signaled the end of a valorous Confederate presence along that was in Colorado, Nevada, and California. Unfortunately for the Rio Grande in the War of Northern Aggression (I AM a the Confederates, New Mexico (which fought on the Union side) Southerner and a Texas A&M grad – it was either put this in or stood in the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History
    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Discoveries in the Chorrillo Formation (Upper Campanian-Lower Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous), Santa Cruz Province, Patagonia, Argentina
    Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat., n.s. 21(2): 217-293, 2019 ISSN 1514-5158 (impresa) ISSN 1853-0400 (en línea) Paleontological discoveries in the Chorrillo Formation (upper Campanian-lower Maastrichtian, Upper Cretaceous), Santa Cruz Province, Patagonia, Argentina Fernando. E. NOVAS1,2, Federico. L. AGNOLIN1,2,3, Sebastián ROZADILLA1,2, Alexis M. ARANCIAGA-ROLANDO1,2, Federico BRISSON-EGLI1,2, Matias J. MOTTA1,2, Mauricio CERRONI1,2, Martín D. EZCURRA2,5, Agustín G. MARTINELLI2,5, Julia S. D´ANGELO1,2, Gerardo ALVAREZ-HERRERA1, Adriel R. GENTIL1,2, Sergio BOGAN3, Nicolás R. CHIMENTO1,2, Jordi A. GARCÍA-MARSÀ1,2, Gastón LO COCO1,2, Sergio E. MIQUEL2,4, Fátima F. BRITO4, Ezequiel I. VERA2,6, 7, Valeria S. PEREZ LOINAZE2,6 , Mariela S. FERNÁNDEZ8 & Leonardo SALGADO2,9 1 Laboratorio de Anatomía Comparada y Evolución de los Vertebrados. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires C1405DJR, Argentina - fernovas@yahoo. com.ar. 2 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. 3 Fundación de Historia Natural “Felix de Azara”, Universidad Maimonides, Hidalgo 775, C1405BDB Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4 Laboratorio de Malacología terrestre. División Invertebrados Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires C1405DJR, Argentina. 5 Sección Paleontología de Vertebrados. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires C1405DJR, Argentina. 6 División Paleobotánica. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, Buenos Aires C1405DJR, Argentina. 7 Área de Paleontología. Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón 2, Ciudad Universitaria (C1428EGA) Buenos Aires, Argentina. 8 Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (CONICET-INIBIOMA), Quintral 1250, 8400 San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • By Aaron Watters BS a Thesis in Geology Submitted to the Graduate
    MIDDLE PENNSYLVANIAN PALEOGEOGRAPHIC AND BASIN ANALYSIS OF THE TAOS TROUGH, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO By Aaron Watters B.S. A Thesis In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES Approved Dr. Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee Dr. James E. Barrick Dr. Seiichi Nagihara Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2014 Copyright 2014, Aaron Watters Texas Tech University, Aaron Watters, August 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The success of a major project like this would not have been possible without the contribution of others. I would like to acknowledge all those who provided me the possibility to complete this thesis. I would like to extend my greatest appreciation to my advisor Dr. Dustin E. Sweet. This thesis would simply not have been possible without his mentorship and constructive feedback. His extensive knowledge and insight helped me compile the necessary research and field data for this project. He educated me on all the different methods used to complete my thesis; even down to organizational skills that provided the essential structure behind the development of my work. He was a big motivation for me to complete my thesis on time, and among all, he was the reason I decided to pursue my graduate degree at Texas Tech University. In addition, I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. James E. Barrick and Dr. Seiichi Nagihara, for their useful suggestions and comments. Special thanks to Dr. James E. Barrick for also helping me provide age analysis on my conodonts.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Geology and Resources of Uranium in the San Juan Basin and Adjacent Region
    u~c..~ OFR :J8- 'JtgLJ all''1 I. i \ "' ! .SUHMARY OF THE GEOLOGY .ANp RESOURCES OF ,URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT 'REGION, NEW MEXICO, ARIZONA, UTAH & COLORADO I , J.L. Ridgley, et. al. 1978 US. 6EOL~ SURVEY ~RD, US'RARY 505 MARQU51"1"5 NW, RM 72e I .1\LB'U·QuERQ~, N.M. 87'102 i I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGY AND RESOURCES OF URANIUM IN THE SAN JUAN BASIN AND ADJACENT REGION, NEW MEXICO, A~IZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO 'V'R.0 t ~.-4~ . GICAL SURVEY p.· ..... P• 0 . .:.;J .. _. ·5 ALBU~U~~QUE, N. By Jennie L. Ridgley, Morris W. Green, Charles T. Pierson, • Warren I. Finch, and Robert D. Lupe Open-file Report 78-964 1978 Contents • Page Abstract Introduction 3 General geologic setting 3 Stratigraphy and depositional environments 4 Rocks of Precambrian age 5 .. Rocks of Cambrian age 5 < 'I Ignacio Quartzite 6 Rocks of Devonian age 6... i Aneth Formation 6 Elbert Formation 7 Ouray Limestone 7 Rocks of Mississippian age 8 Redwall Limestone 8 Leadville Limestone 8 Kelly Limestone 9 Arroyo Penasco Group 10 Log Springs Formation 10 Rocks of Pennsylvanian age 11 Molas Formation 11 ~ermosa Formation 12 .' . Ric9 Formation'· 13 .. •;,. Sandia Fotfuatto~ 13 Madera Limestone 14 Unnamed Pennsylvanian rocks 15 • ii • Rocks of Permian age 15 Bursum Formation 16 Abo Formation 16 Cutler Formation 17. Yeso Formation 18 Glorieta Sandstone 19 San Andres Limestone 19 Rocks of Triassic age 20 Moenkopi(?) Formation 21 Chinle Formation 21 Shinarump Member 21 Monitor Butte Member 22 Petrified Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Pander Society Newsletter
    Pander Society Newsletter S O E R C D I E N T A Y P 1 9 6 7 Compiled and edited by P.H. von Bitter and J. Burke PALAEOBIOLOGY DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY, ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM, TORONTO, ON, CANADA M5S 2C6 Number 41 May 2009 www.conodont.net Webmaster Mark Purnell, University of Leicester 2 Chief Panderer’s Remarks May 1, 2009 Dear Colleagues: It is again spring in southern Canada, that very positive time of year that allows us to forget our winter hibernation & the climatic hardships endured. It is also the time when Joan Burke and I get to harvest and see the results of our winter labours, as we integrate all the information & contributions sent in by you (Thank You) into a new and hopefully ever better Newsletter. Through the hard work of editor Jeffrey Over, Paleontographica Americana, vol. no. 62, has just been published to celebrate the 40th Anniversary of the Pander Society and the 150th Anniversary of the first conodont paper by Christian Pander in 1856; the titles and abstracts are here reproduced courtesy of the Paleontological Research Institution in Ithica, N.Y. Glen Merrill and others represented the Pander Society at a conference entitled “Geologic Problem Solving with Microfossils”, sponsored by NAMS, the North American Micropaleontology Section of SEPM, in Houston, Texas, March 15-18, 2009; the titles of papers that dealt with or mentioned conodonts, are included in this Newsletter. Although there have been no official Pander Society meetings since newsletter # 40, a year ago, there were undoubtedly many unofficial ones; many of these would have been helped by suitable refreshments, the latter likely being the reason I didn’t get to hear about the meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy of the Arroyo Penasco Group, Lower Carboniferous (Mississsippian), North-Central New Mexico Augustus K
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/25 Biostratigraphy of the Arroyo Penasco Group, Lower Carboniferous (Mississsippian), north-central New Mexico Augustus K. Armstrong and Bernard L. Mamet, 1974, pp. 145-158 in: Ghost Ranch, Siemers, C. T.; Woodward, L. A.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 25th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 404 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1974 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Summary of Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Rocks, Manzano Mountains, New Mexico Donald A
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/33 Stratigraphic summary of Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian rocks, Manzano Mountains, New Mexico Donald A. Myers, 1982, pp. 233-237 in: Albuquerque Country II, Wells, S. G.; Grambling, J. A.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 33rd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 370 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1982 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 342–343 (2012) 17–26 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Increased continental weathering flux during orbital-scale sea-level highstands: Evidence from Nd and O isotope trends in Middle Pennsylvanian cyclic carbonates Bethany P. Theiling a,b,⁎, Maya Elrick a, Yemane Asmerom a a University of New Mexico, United States b Purdue University, United States article info abstract Article history: Despite the common occurrence of orbital-scale (104–105 yr) sedimentary cycles in a wide range of Protero- Received 16 September 2011 zoic through Neogene marine and non-marine depositional systems, understanding the effects and phase re- Received in revised form 16 April
    [Show full text]
  • March 13, 2018 March 24, 2018
    MCHENRY COUNTY PRESENTATION CIVIL WAR ROUND DISCUSSION GROUP AT THE TABLE AT THE 414 JUDD STREET 6000 NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WOODSTOCK, ILLINOIS ANNUAL CRYSTAL LAKE, ILLINOIS TUESDAY MEMBERSHIP DUES SATURDAY MARCH 13, 2018 MARCH 24, 2018 BOOK REVIEW BRING IN AND SHARE YOUR LATEST FAVORITE BOOK WITH FELLOW MEMBERS BOOK REVIEW From Wikipedia Missouri was a hotly contested border state populated by both Union and Confederate THE CIVIL WAR sympathizers. War in the state of Missouri IN was continuous between 1861 and 1865, with battles and skirmishes in all areas of the MISSOURI & ARKANSAS state, from the Iowa and Illinois borders in the northeast to the Arkansas border in the FAITH OF THE FATHERS southeast and southwest. Counting minor CATHOLIC CIVIL WAR CHAPLINS actions and skirmishes, Missouri saw more than 1,200 distinct engagements within its REMAINS boundaries . INCLUDE CIVIL WAR Arkansas was a Confederate state, and MCCWRT HEROES played a major role in controlling the vital Mississippi River and neighboring states, WELCOMES ALL THE BATTLE OF including Tennessee and Missouri. There GLORIETA PASS were o ver 750 engagements fought in the TO OUR state of Arkansas, some of the better known NEW MEXICO CAMPAIGN 2018 battles were,the Battle of Pea Ridge in March BATTLE 1862, the Battle of Saint Charles June 17, PRESENTATION APACHE CANYON 1862 , Prarie Grove December, Arkansas GLORIETA PASS Post January, 1863 and the Battle of Helena SEASON fought on July 4,1863. REMAINS THE BATTLE INCLUDE OF GLORIETA PASS CIVIL WAR HEROS From Wikipedia a DECATUR HERALD & REVIEW (DATE UNKNOWN) The Battle of Glorieta Pass, fought from March DECATUR, ILLINOIS- A 6-foot tall obeisk sits 26–28, 1862, in the northern New Mexico atop a stone monument in Greenwood Territory, was the decisive battle of the New Cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a 3-D Subsidence Model for the Late Paleozoic Taos Trough in Northern New Mexico
    Developing a 3-D subsidence model for the late Paleozoic Taos trough in northern New Mexico By Nur Uddin Md Khaled Chowdhury, MS A Dissertation In Geology Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Dustin E. Sweet Chair of Committee George B. Asquith James E. Barrick Seiichi Nagihara Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School December, 2019 Copyright 2019, Nur Uddin Md Khaled Chowdhury Texas Tech University, Nur Uddin Md Khaled Chowdhury, December 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous individuals have been instrumental in the completion of this dissertation. First, and foremost, I would like to sincerely thank my adviser, Dr. Dustin E. Sweet, for his guidance, unwavering support, and ultimately, for making this endeavor thoroughly exciting and enjoyable. I also sincerely thank my committee members Dr. George B. Asquith, Dr. James E. Barrick, and Dr. Seiichi Nagihara. I would like to thank Annabelle Lopez and New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources for providing me access to cores and cuttings repository and providing me available resources including well log data, well reports and strip logs relevant to this study. I am thankful to Neuralog Inc. for providing me free access to Neuralog software. Funding for this research was generously supported by John Emery Adams Memorial Scholarship and Concho Resources Inc. Scholarship from West Texas Geological Society (WTGS), student research grants from Geological Society of America (GSA), and grants-in-aid from the southwest section of American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG). I am indebted to the department of Geosciences at Texas Tech University.
    [Show full text]