DOCSLIB.ORG

Psuuon Pers.Expl Under Rul»357

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Psuuon Pers.Expl Under Rul»357 59 PsUUon SEPTEMBER 17.1891 Pers.ExpL under 60 Rul»357 Special Protection Group Sir. I beg to present a petition signed by Shri (Amendment)Blli, 1991 .which D. T. Jayakumar. Ex M. L A. Karnataka and was passed by the Septem­ Shri ChMuunadu. Zila Parishad Member. ber. 1991.* Hunmur. District Mysore, regarding need to 00 I aiTKflrectedto informthe LoK amend the Indian Tnists Act. 1882. Saiiha that the R % a Sabha. at its sitting held on Tuesday, (II) Re removal of disparity between the 10th September. 1991 uitMui and rural population In adopted the following nwtion the matter of standard of Ihr- In regard to the Joint Commit­ Ing', etc. tee on offices of Profit:- SHRIRAMPALSII^(OomariaganJ): Th a t this House concurs in the Sir. I beg to present a petition signed by Shri recommendation of the Lok Sabha that Bhanu Pratap Singh of village and P.O. a Joint Committee of tfie House to be caiiedthe Joint Commitleeon offtoes of Sohna district SMharthnagar (Uttar Pradesh profit be constituted for the purposes and others regarding (I) removal of disparity set out in the motion adopted the Lol( between urt>an-njral population in the matter Sabhaatitesming held onthe 26th July. of standard of living, Itteracy and mortality; 1991. and resolves that this House do and (ii) treating 'Agriculture' as an 'Industry. join in the said Joint Committee and proceed to elect, in accordance with the 13.11 hrs system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote, five mentbers from among the PERSONAL EXPLANATION UNDER members of the House to serve on the RULE 357 said Joint Committee.* [English] 1 am further to Inform the Lolc Sabha that in pursuance of the above motion, the SHRI INDERJIT (Daijeeilng): Mr. fbilowing members of the Rajya Sabha have Speaker, Sir, my attentton has been drawn been duly elected to the said Commitlee:- repeatedly during the past fortnight to 1. Shri E. Balanandan separate but shocking statements made against me by two Members of Pariiament 2.ShrbraHKailashpatl of the Sikkim Sangram Parishad. Shri mati Dll Kumari Bhandari in the Lok Sabha on 3.ShrlSomPal July18 and Shri Karma Topden In the Rajya Sabha on July 19 last. Both attacked me on 4. Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu the t>asis of a stalerpent alleged to have 5. Shri Subramanlan Swan^ been made by me at put>lic meeting at Kurseong, whteh is apart of my constituency of Daijeeiing. I was stated to have dedared 13.12 hr* that *The Nepalese have no place in Imfia.* PETmONS Friends,among some veteran members of the House advised me to Ignont the two (i) Re need to amend the Indian Trust Act. 1882 statements. But I now find that these felkiw members and their partons hawe exptoited lE n g m n y dedskm not to formaHy contradid their statemente. Consequently, many innocent SHRIK D. DEVEOOWDA(HASSAN): and fine people in different p ^ of our 61 PBfs. ExpL under BHAORA26,1913(S4/M) Pars. ExpL under 62 Ruh3S7 Rub 357 country tiave been misled, promptlng'nie. anything against a Member of the Rs^ya Mr. Speaker. Sir, to approach you and get Sabha. He is just giving an explanatton to yourkind permission to madcethls statement what has been alleged against him. He today and set the record straight. cannot go to Rs^jya Sat>ha if he is also not allowed to make a statement here, then It I want to make it clear once and for all does not become a part of the record of the that I never staled what has t>een attributed PariiamenL That is why, he is altowed. to me. The statement alleged to have been made by me Is false and fabrteated. (Intem^ftlons) It Is a cakHilated effort to malign and [TmnslaOori^ vilify me. I wish the Members concerned had extended to me, as a fellow Member of SHRI ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE: What Parliament, the minimum courtesy of wlH t>e its result? Today, Shri Inderjit ki giving checking the veracity of the statement. At a rejoinder to the Utterances in one stage, Mr. To p ^n said in the Rajya ............. made in Riyya Sabha, tomorrow Sabha: ‘Such a statement. If tme, would...* there will be a counter reply In Rajya Sabha They shouM have checked with me before to the statement made by him here today attacking me...(/n«9m<prtons) ...(/fntemyXtons). SHRI ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE [TmnsleOoril (Lucknow): Sir, whateverthat has been sakJ in the Rajya Sabha need not be refened to MR. SPEAKER: No, actually.____ here. SHRI ATAL BIHARI VAJPAEE: When MR. SPEAKER: A Member of Rajya Sabha has alleged something against him. will this questton-answer series end? He cannot go and make a statement over there. This is why, he is making a statement MR. SPEAKER: l4o Member of this hers. House will be altowed to spee^ against the memt>er of that House. He us giving SHRI SOMNATH CHATTERJEE explanatton in what has gone on record. V (Bolpur): Do not give personal explanation there is any such thing on. (or something made outside...(fri<»rFuptf9ns) Sir, he can go to the pr»ss...(/lnl0mi^ibns) lEngOsNi MR. SPEAKER: I will just read out the H he wants to allege anything against ruflng. It says: him, he won't be aHowed to do that There te a difference between giving explanatton and If the ^legations are made In Rs^ya naking an allegatton, and it is the ruling. Ssdbha againstaMemberofLok Sabha, the latter may be permttted to make a {htemjpHoruii personal ex^anatton to clarify his posltkm." MR. SPEAKER: We wOlappiy our mind. But, these are the luHngs. SHRI INDERJIT: Thank you. Sir, ....{ManupUons) SHRI SOMNATH CHATTERJEE (Bolpur): Sir, It is not that we are just MR. SPEAKER: He te not aHeging supporting anything saM In the Rajya Sabha 63 P^EMpLtmdar S E P T B i ^ 17.1991 Pm . EKfiLmOtr m fU a a S T . A * W |Sh.SomnafthCtiattei)M] redproceiba*. I amadseaiMMflrihirfiiet that many Napideee^hwre asrvecl ln 'tlie against tiw Member of the Lok Sabha. Not mdtan Am y ftwn the drUsh flnriM i M that The c^jeslion is how it is to tw deait continue to do so tier l o i ^ in the Q oiMm wtth? (Iniemiotfon^. Regiments. We In India hsMe evsty mason to be grateful to themfortheirsacdHoasiM MR. ^>EAKER: This is exactly whitt i een^ioes. Few bi ttie woM can equal Iheir have read out to you. If ttie allegations are vatour. I am glad ourown Qoridiasare now made in Rajya Sabha against a Member of coming forward in iaiger mmters to seive Ssdiha, the latter may be pemnltted to theb-motheiland. There is noquestton of my make a personal expianatton, to clarify his ever casting any asperston on the toyaly of posRton. This IsaRuHng given on30 August, ttiese Jawans. 1969. Tim e is a IRuling given also on 1 April. 1970 and there is athiid Ruling given on 4 Finally. Mrs. Speaker. Sir. I have been April. 1970. There are many Rulings. accused of trying to cflvMe more than 10- miUton Nepali-speaverkftig people. Nothing SlIRi INI3ER JfT: Thank you. Sir. for couklbeforlherfromthetnjth.True. Idraw uphoMing justice, {tttamptkms). aciearaisttncnon— —t---- A*-------Al--- between■- - «----- Indians---■ - -----— and -nonoe -■-----» --- for-lndians. We have this in India persons SKRiK.P.UNNIKRiSI-INAN(Bagdora): win are Indints andtiiosewhoare Nepalese. What are the poiitk»i cempuistons? You Both have their respective places in M ia. cannot bdng In a personal exptenatlon. One as Indian nattonals and ^ other as (kitemptton^ Nepalese under the Indo-Nepai Treaty. There is no scope for any confusion. SHRi INDER JIT: K has been my pleasure, indeedto haveknow Mrs. Bhandari I request both Shri KaumaTopden and well during the past few years and so also Shrimati Oil Kumarl Bhandari and their Mr. Topden.whomifirst met as the Secretary supporters to stop maligning me. to the SMdm Chief Minister In Gangtok. I know ttiey have their personal and poiitk»l SHRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR (BaiHa): computekms. Both are aware of my role as Mr. Speaker. SJr, 1 amsony you have allowed a mecHator in bringing about the t>wjeeli(^ him. But. he cannot make a statement on Accord. They know on too well my affectton Indo-Nepalese rslattons in seif-expianatton. foriythefine people of the Daijeeinghllis and I do not know what he Is talking of? my commitment to dobig my best forgetting {Interruptions). Mr. Speaker. Sir, I am them tong-delayedfalrpla^ and Justice. Both speaking. I amfiHUng thattiiis istoodelcate know equally well thcrt it is the tove and amattertobedealtwithbythehon.Mennber. affectkMi of ttie people of the Daijeellng hill He shouW make a statement and he shouM areas that has enabled me to win the Lok say that he has no disregard or disrespect Sabha electkm Mrith a huge majority twice In for Nepalese. But he has quoted bido- two year»4n 1989 and again In May iJ »L NepaieseTrealy and ay that Has he known the implcattons of what he is siQfing in this The indo4lepal Treaty grants to the Mouse?HaveyouconsUeredtheknpiicaUon Nepalese bilmfiaandtothe Indians k)N^)al of what is contained in his statement? And certain reciprocal rights in regard to how does it come under seif-explanatkNi, -l resMmoe. tiade and emptoyment. etc. Tlie do not know. Nepalese y e fuUyenHaed to reskte in India m d these lights and piitHieges on a IrecogniBettie right of sel^qiianadon., «5 Bik*.B9>Lim(hr flHW3RA26.1013(S«M4) P M ».E x p L m ^ 66 AUlraS/ TheWleirtber h eniiiM » about tfw wiioto Jndo-ttopalM} ratatiofit and tlw NapalM* In India.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Politics of Coalition in India
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 01–11 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Politics of Coalition in India Farooq Ahmad Malik1 and Bilal Ahmad Malik2 Abstract The paper wants to highlight the evolution of coalition governments in india. The evaluation of coalition politics and an analysis of how far coalition remains dynamic yet stable. How difficult it is to make policy decisions when coalition of ideologies forms the government. More often coalitions are formed to prevent a common enemy from the government and capturing the power. Equally interesting is the fact a coalition devoid of ideological mornings survives till the enemy is humbled. While making political adjustments, principles may have to be set aside and in this process ideology becomes the first victim. Once the euphoria victory is over, differences come to the surface and the structure collapses like a pack of cards. On the grounds of research, facts and history one has to acknowledge india lives in politics of coalition. Keywords: india, government, coalition, withdrawal, ideology, partner, alliance, politics, union Introduction Coalition is a phenomenon of a multi-party government where a number of minority parties join hands for the purpose of running the government which is otherwise not possible. A coalition is formed when many groups come into common terms with each other and define a common programme or agenda on which they work. A coalition government always remains in pulls and pressures particularly in a multinational country like india.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of the Lok Sabha
    DISSOLUTION OF THE LOK SABHA Tanusri Prasanna* Introduction The dissolution of the twelfth Lok Sabha on the twenty sixth day of April, 1999, by the President Mr. K.R. Narayanan, and the role of the latter in the intense political decision making preceding the same, have thrown open afresh the debate as to the exact role of the President as envisaged in the Constitution in the matter of dissolution. This paper attempts to analyse this issue in light of various controversial views on the subject. Pre-independence constitutional debates in India were influenced by two models of democratic government: the British Parliamentary system, and the Presidential system of the United States. In the final analysis the British model being closer home, "every instalment of constitutional reform was regarded as a step towards the establishment of a democratic and responsible government as it functioned in Britain."' Thus, it is widely accepted by various scholars that the founding fathers of the Constitution had opted for the parliamentary system of government. Working on this premise, the concepts such as executive decision making as well as delineating limits and laying a system of checks and balances on the different wings of the government as provided by the inherent federal structure, have been debated over and over again. However, when the Constitution actually came into force, a reading of its provisions sparked off a new line of thought as to the very nature of government, and the Presidential model of the United States which had been earlier rejected was now compared and contrasted.2 These discussions and debates were mainly concerned with the respective powers of the President and the Prime minister in the Constitution and in cases where both entities were strong the clash of opinions was soon recognised.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Prime Ministers of India - Captivating GK Questions for Class 3
    10 Prime Ministers of India - Captivating GK Questions For Class 3 Answer the following GK Questions on 10 Prime Ministers of India: Q1. Name the first Prime Minister of India who served office (15 August 1947 - 27 May 1964) until his death. a) Gulzarilal Nanda b) Jawaharlal Nehru c) Rajendra Prasad d) Lal Bahadur Shastri Q2. _____________________ is the current Prime Minister of India (26 May 2014 – present). a) Narendra Modi b) Atal Bihari Vajpayee c) Manmohan Singh d) Ram Nath Kovind Q3. Who was the Prime Minister of India (9 June 1964 - 11 January 1966) until his death? a) Gulzarilal Nanda b) Charan Singh c) Lal Bahadur Shastri d) Morarji Desai Q4. Who served as Prime Minister of India from 24 January 1966 - 24 March 1977? a) Jawaharlal Nehru b) Gulzarilal Nanda c) Gopinath Bordoloi d) Indira Gandhi Q5. Name the Prime Minister of India who served office from 28 July 1979 - 14 January 1980. a) Jyoti Basu b) Morarji Desai c) Charan Singh d) V. V. Giri Q6. _______________________ served as the Prime Minister of India (21 April 1997 - 19 March 1998). a) Inder Kumar Gujral b) Charan Singh c) H. D. Deve Gowda d) Morarji Desai Q7. Name the Prime Minister of India who served office from 21 June 1991 - 16 May 1996. a) H. D. Deve Gowda b) P. V. Narasimha Rao c) Atal Bihari Vajpayee d) Chandra Shekhar Q8. ____________________________ was the Prime Minister of India (31 October 1984 - 2 December 1989). a) Chandra Shekhar b) Indira Gandhi c) Rajiv Gandhi d) P. V. Narasimha Rao Q9.
    [Show full text]
  • Result of CCAC Exam April-2021. for Complete Details Click Here
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NIELIT PATNA CENTRE Grade obtained by Candidates for the CCAC April-2021 Exam SL. No. Roll No. Candidate Name Father's Name Result 1 PT20C50034324 YASHWANT KUMAR HIRA PRASAD GUPTA C 2 PT20C50036093 SANTOSH KUMAR KUSHESHWSR SAH F 3 PT20C50036243 RAKESH RANJAN RAJ KUMAR SINGH C 4 PT20C50036977 JAI KUMAR JYOTI CHANDESHWARI YADAV D 5 PT20C50037017 ANIL KUMAR THAKUR LATE TARAKANT THAKUR F 6 PT20C50037258 DASHRATH RAUT LATE BOUKURAUT ABS 7 PT20C50037640 MANOJ KUMAR MALLICK SURESH MALLICK F 8 PT20D50020132 NAVEEN KUMAR SHIV KUMAR CHOUDHARY C 9 PT20D50022433 SONU KUMAR BHAGIRATH SINGH F 10 PT20D50032002 RAJIV KUMAR RAM NARAYAN PRASAD ABS 11 PT20D50034144 SONALI KUMARI DULAL CHANDRA DAS C 12 PT20D50035439 BIRENDRA KUMAR KAMLESHWARI YADAV ABS 13 PT20D50036129 CHANDRA SHEKHAR PRASAD DEV SUNDAR SAHU C 14 PT20D50036401 ASHOK KUMAR ROY CHOUTHI ROY F 15 PT20D50037151 SATISH CHANDRA MISHRA LATE JAGANNATH MISHRA F 16 PT20D50037152 AMAR NATH KARN LATE SHREE NARAYAN DAS ABS 17 PT20D50037779 MANOJ KUMAR RAM CHANDRA SINGH A 18 PT20D50038178 ATUL VERMA LATE BIPIN KUMAR D 19 PT20D50039248 RAJEEV KUMAR RANJAN MAHADEO PANDIT C 20 PT20D50039335 BIPIN KUMAR SANGRAM KUMAR SAH C 21 PT20D50039523 SANJAY KUMAR RAM KISHORE SINGH F 22 PT20T50024763 AMRENDRA KUMAR SRI RAM CHANDRA SINGH F 23 PT20T50037971 JAI PRAKASH SINGH SHYAM BIHARI SINGH C 24 PT20T50037972 RAJESHWAR SINGH RAM PATI SINGH F SHAILENDRA KUMAR 25 PT20T50038021 HARI RAM KANNOJIA B KANNOJIA 26 PT20T50038022 ARVIND RAI LALBAHADUR RAI F 27 PT20T50038023
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Received
    hid. fn. ffAgri. Econ. Vol. 53. Na. 4. Oct.-Dee. /998 Publications Received Auld, B.A. and Kim, K.U.(Eds.), Weed Management in Rice, FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 139, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1998. Pp. xiii+272. Rs. 600.00. Ayres, Robert U. and Weaver, Paul M.(Eds.), Eco-Restructuring: Implications for Sus- tainable Development, Vistaar Publications, New Delhi, 1998. Pp. vi+417. Rs. 495.00. Banerjee, G.C.,A Textbook ofAnimal Husbandry,Eighth Edition, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1998. Pp. xv+1079. Rs. 290.00. Bathrick, David p., Fostering Global Well-Being: A New Paradigm to Revitalize Agri- cultural and Rural Development, Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 26,International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington,D.C., U.S.A., 1998. Pp. vi+37. Bogaert, MVd Sj.,.Motivating Professionalsfor Rural Work: A Challengefor Management Institutes in India, Occasional Publication 15, Institute of Rural Management, 1998. Pp. 17(mimeo.). Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology. A Study on Cropping Patterns and Production Performance of Agriculture in District, Unnao (U.P.), Department of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Kanpur, 1998. Pp. 33(mimeo.). Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology. A Study on Cost of Production of Important Crops in the Area of Jurisdiction of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Department of Agricultural Econ- omics and Statistics, Kanpur, 1998. Pp. 21 (mimeo.). Chandrakanth, M.G.; Adya. Sushma and Ananda, K.K., Scarcity of Groundwaterfor Irri- gation: Economics of Coping Mechanisms in Hard Rock Areas, Sponsor: The Ford Foundation, New Delhi; Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, March 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohan India Transformed I-Xx 1-540.Indd
    1 The Road to the 1991 Industrial Policy Reforms and Beyond : A Personalized Narrative from the Trenches Rakesh Mohan or those of us beyond the age of fifty, India has been transformed beyond Fwhat we might even have dreamt of before the 1990s. In real terms, the Indian economy is now about five times the size it was in 1991. This, of course, does not match the pace of change that the Chinese economy has recorded, which has grown by a factor of ten over the same period and has acquired the status of a global power. Nonetheless, the image of India, and its own self-image, has changed from one of a poverty-ridden, slow-growing, closed economy to that of a fast-growing, open, dynamic one. Though much of the policy focus has been on the economy, change has permeated almost all aspects of life. India now engages with the world on a different plane. The coincident collapse of the Soviet Union opened up new directions for a foreign policy more consistent with a globalizing world. With the acquisition of nuclear capability in the late 1990s, its approach to defence and security has also undergone great transformation. Though much has been achieved, India is still a low–middle income emerging economy and has miles to go before poverty is truly eliminated. Only then will it be able to hold its head high and attain its rightful place in the comity of nations. 3 4 Rakesh Mohan This book chronicles the process of reform in all its different aspects through the eyes of many of the change-makers who have been among the leaders of a resurgent India.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Behind the Great Men of 1991 - Livemint
    7/24/2017 The people behind the Great Men of 1991 - Livemint MINT ON SUNDAY Share Home » Mint on Sunday » The Small story Last Modied: Sat, Aug 27 2016. 11 35 PM IST The people behind the Great Men of 1991 The popular narrative of liberalization does grave injustice to the many advisers and bureaucrats who played a pivotal and a largely ignored role (From left) Ashok Desai, Deepak Nayyar and Rakesh Mohan. Photos by Hindustan Times and Abhijit Bhatlekar/Mint Ankit Mital It is customary to question the “Great Man” historical narratives by invoking Tolstoy. So, pardon the cliché. Tolstoy notes in the second epilogue to War and Peace that general historians look “for the cause of events not in the power of one man, but in the interaction of many persons connected with the event”. This is a useful way to look the history of India’s 1991 reforms, especially as an antidote to the numerous—at times nauseating—Great Man accounts we have been flooded with. When Manmohan Singh was selected as prime minister by Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party, reams where written about how he had emerged as the “middle-class hero” by liberalizing the Indian economy. With the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance’s fall from grace, that narrative was pushed back. Now, another crowd has discovered P.V. Narasimha Rao as the shrewd Chanakya, the man who set the political plumbing right to push through the reforms, but was denied his place in history by his own party. By most accounts, including Singh’s own admirable admission, the outcomes would have been a little different if I.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Chandra Shekhar (01-7-1927 to 08-072008)
    Chandra Shekhar (01-7-1927 to 08-072008) Chandra Shekhar (Singh) son of Shri Sadanand Singh was born on 1st July 1927 (Official, 17th April is real) in a very poor family of agriculturist in Ibrahimpatti, a village in the Ballia district of Uttar Pradesh. Education and start of career in politics Chandra Shekhar received his early education near his native village in Ballia and for graduation and Master’s degree in political science, he went to Allahabad University. He was awarded a Master of Arts degree at Allahabad University. He was known as a firebrand student leader. During his early days he came under the influence of Acharya Narendra Deva, a great Socialist leader of that time. After finishing his education in 1951, he had developed an interest in politics. He joined the socialist movement. After graduation, he became active in socialist movement. He joined the socialist Party and was elected secretary of the district Socialist Party (SP), Ballia, 1951-52. Within a year, he was elected joint secretary of the Praja Socialist Party’s (PSP) State unit in Uttar Pradesh, 1952-55. In 1955-56, he took over as General Secretary of the PSP’s State unit. During 1959-62, he was Member of the National Executive of the P.S.P. His career as a parliamentarian began with his election to the Rajya Sabha from Uttar Pradesh in 1962, as a PSP candidate. From 1962 to 1977, Chandra Shekhar was in Rajya Sabha, the Upper house of the Parliament of India. In 1964, he joined Congress Party along with some PSP leaders under the leadership of Asoka Mehta.
    [Show full text]
  • Govt Reaches out to India Inc in Its Push for $5Tn Economy, Vows Reforms - the Times of India - Mumbai, 12/2/2019
    12/2/2019 Govt reaches out to India Inc in its push for $5tn economy, vows reforms - The Times Of India - Mumbai, 12/2/2019 Govt reaches out to India Inc in its push for $5tn economy, vows reforms TIMES NEWS NETWORK Mumbai: The message from the three top Union ministers — Amit Shah, Nirmala Sitharaman and Piyush Goyal — to India Inc was clear: Tell us your problems and we’ll fix them while pushing reforms. Since this was perhaps the first time that a highpowered team from the Modi government was talking about the economy amid a slowdown, India Inc was in full attendance at the Economic Times Awards for Corporate Excellence here on Saturday. Union home minister Amit Shah told the gathering, “You represent 60% of India’s GDP. Without your support, the dream of a $5-trillion economy cannot be achieved.” India Inc’s big guns at the awards function included Mukesh Ambani, N Chandrasekaran, Kumar Mangalam Birla, Sunil Mittal, Rahul Bajaj, Uday Kotak and Anil Agarwal. According to Shah, the government had undertaken “detoxification” of the economy in the last five years, and the next five will see a series of reforms that would make India one of the most powerful economies in the world. Pointing out the measures taken by the Centre for making India a $5-trillion economy, Shah said that a slew of labour reforms are in the offing. On ease of doing business, he said India has moved up to the 77th rank this year from 142 in 2014. And by 2024, it would rank in the 30s, Shah added.
    [Show full text]
  • LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version)
    :lrventh Series, Vol. I, No. 4 Monday, May 27, 1096 Jyaistha 6, 1918 (.S'~kn) LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version) First Session (Eleventh Lok Sabha) fVoL I contains Nos. I to 5) LOK SAB~ASECRETARIAT NEW DELE1 Price : Rs. 50.00 EDITORIAL BOARD Shri Surendra Mishra Secretary-General Lok Sabha Shrirnatl Reva Nayyar Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Shri P.C. Bhan Chiel Editor Lok Sabha Secretadat Shri A.P Chakravarti Senior Editor Smt Kamla Sharma Shri P.K. Sharma Edflor Editor Shr: FL Bamrara Shri Rakesh Kurnar Shri J.B.S. Rawat Ass~s!an: Editor Assistant Editor Assistant Edkor (Ohd,ilh~l.ENOLISH PROrkEDIWS l'~''LU061, Ih. E~'jllSH VERSIO(JAND ORIGINALHINDI PRWEEDINW INCLUDED IN HINDI V~KSIOKWILL 86 TREATED AS ALTH~JR~TA~II\'L.Ah3 NO1 TM TkANSLATlON THEREOF) CONTENTS [Eleventh Series, Vol. I, First Session, l996/1918 (Saka)] No 4, Monday, May 27, 1996/Jyaishtha 6, 1918 (Saka) C;C&I~IIS EE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES (TENTH LOK SABHA) Th~r~y-NmthRepor, - La~d RE INCIDENTS OF ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN ASSAM MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 (I) Need for ar aerodrome at Ajmer Prof Rasa Smgh Rawat (11) Need to reconstruct budge at Kuzh~thura~on the Tr~vandrum-Kanyakumar~Nat~onal H~ghway Shrl N Denn~s (111) Neeti to Implement the 15 polnt programme to protect the Interests of Musllms SIIII Pr~yaRanjan Dasmuns~ ~IVJNeed to take steps to protect Revalr dam In Bahralch d~strctof Uttar Pradesh Shr~Ben1 Prasad Verma rv) Need to construct a ra~lwayoverbr~dge In Fatehpur town of Uttar Pradesh Shr~V~shambhar Prasad N~shad (VI) Need to gwe compensatlori to vlctlms of
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List of Recommendations Received for Padma Awards - 2014
    Alphabetical List of recommendations received for Padma Awards - 2014 Sl. No. Name Recommending Authority 1. Shri Manoj Tibrewal Aakash Shri Sriprakash Jaiswal, Minister of Coal, Govt. of India. 2. Dr. (Smt.) Durga Pathak Aarti 1.Dr. Raman Singh, Chief Minister, Govt. of Chhattisgarh. 2.Shri Madhusudan Yadav, MP, Lok Sabha. 3.Shri Motilal Vora, MP, Rajya Sabha. 4.Shri Nand Kumar Saay, MP, Rajya Sabha. 5.Shri Nirmal Kumar Richhariya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6.Shri N.K. Richarya, Chhattisgarh. 3. Dr. Naheed Abidi Dr. Karan Singh, MP, Rajya Sabha & Padma Vibhushan awardee. 4. Dr. Thomas Abraham Shri Inder Singh, Chairman, Global Organization of People Indian Origin, USA. 5. Dr. Yash Pal Abrol Prof. M.S. Swaminathan, Padma Vibhushan awardee. 6. Shri S.K. Acharigi Self 7. Dr. Subrat Kumar Acharya Padma Award Committee. 8. Shri Achintya Kumar Acharya Self 9. Dr. Hariram Acharya Government of Rajasthan. 10. Guru Shashadhar Acharya Ministry of Culture, Govt. of India. 11. Shri Somnath Adhikary Self 12. Dr. Sunkara Venkata Adinarayana Rao Shri Ganta Srinivasa Rao, Minister for Infrastructure & Investments, Ports, Airporst & Natural Gas, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh. 13. Prof. S.H. Advani Dr. S.K. Rana, Consultant Cardiologist & Physician, Kolkata. 14. Shri Vikas Agarwal Self 15. Prof. Amar Agarwal Shri M. Anandan, MP, Lok Sabha. 16. Shri Apoorv Agarwal 1.Shri Praveen Singh Aron, MP, Lok Sabha. 2.Dr. Arun Kumar Saxena, MLA, Uttar Pradesh. 17. Shri Uttam Prakash Agarwal Dr. Deepak K. Tempe, Dean, Maulana Azad Medical College. 18. Dr. Shekhar Agarwal 1.Dr. Ashok Kumar Walia, Minister of Health & Family Welfare, Higher Education & TTE, Skill Mission/Labour, Irrigation & Floods Control, Govt.
    [Show full text]
  • State Public Service Tribunal, U.P
    STATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL, U.P. INDIRA BHAWAN, LUCKNOW Website(URL): http://spst.up.nic.in Issued under the authority of Hon'ble Chairman Daily Cause List Date : 26-Aug-2016 Page 1 S.N Case No Nature Petitioner Name Department Pet. Counsel Opp. Counsel Court-3-Pre Lunch-10:30 AM-Hon'ble Sri Brijesh Kumar, Member (J)- Court-3 Hon'ble Sri Brijesh Kumar, Member (J) Pre Lunch 10:30 AM 0.00 15U/R- 24 1 UR0028/2014/ Na Mohd.Shafiuullaha Revenue M.N.Tripathi P.O. 940/1997 19Review 2 UR0017/2015/ Interest Bachau Prasad Irrigation S.S.L. Srivastava P.O. 885/2005 Yadav 3 RE0132/2015/ O.M. State Of U.P. Home P.O. D.N. Pandey 1113/2007 Vs vinod Kumar Rana 27Final Hearing 4 935/1996 Pay And S.N.Tripathi Labour K.S.Bist P.O. Allowances 5 2755/1998 R.B.S. Ravi Chandra Forest D.S. Shukla P.O. Srivastava, 6 1349/2000 Recovery Vrashketu Chandra Cane Mn Tripathi P.O. 7 1219/2001 Censure Entry Raj Mangal Singh A.D.A D.P. Srivastava P.O. 8 342/2002 Adverse Entry Ram Prakash Trade Tax S.P.Singh,Radha P.O. Gautam Singh,K.K.Pande y 9 272/2003 Censure Entry Ram Kumar Tayal U.P.C.L. D.P.Srivastava Mohan Agrawal 10 1200/2003 T.S.I. Santun Singh Revenue D.S.Shukla P.O. 11 61/2004 Censure Entry Piyush Kumar Mandi S.P.Singh K.Gopal,Smt. Agrawal, Pratima Misra 12 295/2004 O.M.
    [Show full text]