DOCSLIB.ORG

Génocide Rwandais : Le Peuple Crie Justice !

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Génocide Rwandais : Le Peuple Crie Justice ! Génocide rwandais : Le peuple crie justice ! http://www.mondialisation.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=8283 Génocide rwandais : Le peuple crie justice ! Mémorandum adressé au Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies Par Partenariat-Intwari Le 8 mars 2008 Cellule de la Documentation & Sécurité du Partenariat-Intwari Mémorandum adressé au Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies Plaidoyer pour une enquête globale, objective et impartiale sur le génocide rwandais et ses conséquences : Résultats d'investigations menées par la Cellule de la Documentation & Sécurité du Partenariat-Intwari. Février 2008 Liste des abréviations et acronymes AFDL Alliance des Forces Démocratiques de Libération APR Armée Patriotique Rwandaise CDR Coalition pour la Défense de la République CVTD Convention de Vienne sur le droit des traités DIR Dialogue Inter Rwandais DMI Directorate of Military Intelligence EAC East African Community ESO External Security Organisation FAR Forces Armées Rwandaises FDC Forces Démocratiques de changement FOCA Forces Combattantes Abacunguzi FPR Front patriotique rwandais GTBE Gouvernement de transition à base élargie ICN Intelligence communications network IRC International Rescue Committee ISO Internal Security Organization ITT International Telephone and Telegraph JDR Jeunesse démocratique rwandaise MDR Mouvement démocratique républicain MINUAR Mission des nations Unies au Rwanda MONUOR Mission d’observation des Nations Unies en Ouganda et au Rwanda MRND Mouvement révolutionnaire national pour le développement NRM National Resistance Movement NRA National Resistance Army ONU Organisation des Nations Unies 1 sur 45 9/11/2009 10:45 Génocide rwandais : Le peuple crie justice ! http://www.mondialisation.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=8283 PDC Parti démocrate chrétien PL Parti Libéral PPU Presidential Protection Unit PSD Parti Social Démocrate RAGL Région de l’Afrique des Grands Lacs RDC République démocratique du Congo RDF Rwanda Defence Forces TIP Tutsi International Power SPLA Armée populaire de libération du Soudan UPDF Uganda Peoples Defence Force URSS Union des républiques socialistes soviétiques 1. Synthèse Un criminel de guerre promu «Héros» du Rwanda et de l'humanité! Le juge espagnol Fernando Andreu Merelles a lancé, mercredi 6 février 2008, des mandats d'arrêts à l'encontre de quarante hauts responsables de l'armée rwandaise pour actes de génocide, crimes de guerre et terrorisme commis au Rwanda et en République démocratique du Congo entre le 1er octobre 1990 et 2002. Le général Paul Kagame, dont la responsabilité est désignée sans ambiguïté, est épargné, pour l'instant, en raison de son statut de chef d'Etat en exercice. A la faveur de sa victoire militaire sur les forces du régime Habyarimana et solidement soutenu par ses puissants parrains américains et anglais, le général Paul Kagame s'est imposé au peuple rwandais comme son « Sauveur » et son «Libérateur»! Le «Héros» partout célébré pour avoir arrêté un génocide pourtant entièrement consommé. Curieusement, l’article 14 de la Constitution rwandaise affirme en des termes clairs et précis que le génocide s’est étalé sur la période du 01 octobre 1990 au 31 dé cembre 1994 : «L'Etat, dans les limites de ses capacités, prend des mesures spéciales pour le bien-être des rescapés démunis à cause du génocide commis au Rwanda du 1er octobre 1990 au 31 décembre 1994, des personnes handicapées, des personnes sans ressources, des personnes âgées ainsi que d'autres person nes vulnérables ». Comment, dans de telles conditions, ne pas se demander par quelle magie aucun membre Tutsi du FPR n’a jusqu'à ce jour été jugé, ni par le Tribunal pénal international pour le Rwanda (TPIR) ni par les juridictions nationales rwandaises ou étrangères? Est-ce à dire qu'aucun d'entre eux n'ait trempé dans les crimes de guerre, crimes de viols, crimes de paix, crimes contre l’humanité et crimes de génocide qui ont émaillé cette sombre période? Tout se déroule comme si au Rwanda la culpabilité et la justice devaient être à sens unique, la mémoire de la guerre et du génocide être sélective et exclusive. Le peuple rwandais est littéralement pris au piège de l’instrumentalisation du génocide des Tutsi. Ces derniers sont parfois considérés comme de s «Juifs d’Afrique» dans l'intention manifeste de prévenir la moindre tentative de « révisionnisme » susceptible de conduire à la relecture des événements tragiques survenus au Rwanda, une relecture qui, cependant, semble de plus en plus inéluctable. Tout se passe en effet comme si au Rwanda il n’y avait eu qu’une seule et unique partie belligérante, en l’occurrence celle où se retrouvent globalisés sans doute à tort tous les Hutu du Rwanda. On fait comme si les victimes étaient d'un seul camp, à savoir celui des Tutsi et les bourreaux de l'autre, à savoir celui des Hutu. On se retrouve piégé dans un schéma aussi cynique que simpliste dans lequel s'opposeraient à mort les «méchants» Hutu et les «gentils» Tutsi! Aux yeux de l’ONU, le FPR serait pourtant qualifié pour la mission délicate de réconcilier les composantes d’une nation dont il constitue, à notre avis, l'un des principaux fossoyeurs. Comment un Etat fondamentalement partial pourrait-il rassurer tous ses citoyens? Le FPR, juge et partie dans la tragédie rwandaise Financées à coup de millions de dollars par des bailleurs de fonds en apparence sans scrupule, les fameuses juridictions «gacaca» taillées sur mesure font rage dans le pays où elles attisent l'injustice, encouragent la délation et la haine et consacrent l'inégalité des citoyens devant la loi, au sein d'une société toujours aussi traumatisée par les conséquences d'une tragédie mal assumée. Il s’agit manifestement d’une justice de vainqueur, taillée sur mesure et ayant pour mission d'assurer l’impunité à une certaine catégorie de la population rwandaise. Mais malgré tous les subterfuges utilisés, le gouvernement FPR ne parvient pas à stabiliser en profondeur la situation politique dans le pays. Au contraire, des milliers de familles continuent d’être spoliées de leurs biens, d'autres sont détenus parfois depuis 14 ans et sans le moindre dossier, on relève tant de disparitions forcées et tant de gens contraints à l’exil. On assiste aujourd'hui à une situation politique toujours aussi instable et très dangereuse dans la mesure où le conflit rwandais est loin d’être résolu et de révéler sa cause et sa finalité véritables. Il s’est même considérablement régionalisé et internationalisé au point que l'on peut affirmer sans le moindre risque de se tromper que la source de la crise prévalant dans le Nord-Kivu en RDC se trouve bel et bien au Rwanda. Au chevet de la RDC depuis plusieurs années déjà, la Communauté internationale aurait dû s'en apercevoir mais rien n'indique réellement que la paix 2 sur 45 9/11/2009 10:45 Génocide rwandais : Le peuple crie justice ! http://www.mondialisation.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=8283 et la stabilité de cette région tant convoitée soient inscrites sur son agenda. Le génocide des Tutsi, la partie visible de l'iceberg Le génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda est une réalité indéniable. Mais aussi effroyable qu'il puisse paraître, ce génocide dans sa version officielle à plusieurs égards contestable, ne constitue que la partie visible de l'iceberg du génocide rwandais planifié par Museveni. Dans une décision rendue le 1er décembre 2006 à Arusha, la chambre d'appel du Tribunal pénal international sur le Rwanda (TPIR) a réitéré son « constat judiciaire » du génocide perpétré contre les Tutsi du Rwanda en 1994. Dans une précédente décision rendue le 16 juin 2006 dans le cadre du procès de trois dirigeants nationaux de l'ex-parti présidentiel, le Mouvement républicain national pour la démocratie et le développement (MRND), la chambre d'appel avait conclu que le génocide des Tutsi du Rwanda constituait « un fait de notoriété publique » faisant partie de l'histoire de l'humanité et qui n'est plus à démontrer. La chambre d'appel du TPIR avait néanmoins tenu à souligner que le «constat judiciaire» du génocide ne dispense pas le Procureur d'apporter les preuves de sa thèse d'un plan du génocide. Il serait donc permis de poursuivre les investigations afin de découvrir le plan du génocide. C'est ce que nous avons tenté de faire en élucidant certains points qui nous semblaient cruciaux et que le Procureur a préféré ignorer soit par omission soit par action et pour des motifs encore mal expliqués. Remodelage de l'Afrique sur fond d'une guerre inavouable entre puissances dites «civilisées» Après avoir remonté aux sources du drame rwandais qui n’est en réalité qu’un des maillons de la chaîne dans le cadre d’une conflagration mondiale, nous démontrons, preuves à l’appui, pourquoi l’agression de l’Ouganda contre le Rwanda a été orientée dans un certain sens, celui de la reconnaissance du génocide des seuls Tutsi alors que celui-ci s'inscrit indiscutablement dans le plan d'une plus large extermination qui, initialement, visait plutôt les Hutu du Rwanda. Selon des documents ultrasecrets obtenus auprès des services de renseignements ougandais et rwandais, l'invasion armée du Rwanda par l'armée ougandaise sous le couvert d'un mouvement rebelle rwandais créé et armé à cet effet, obéissait avant tout à un plan ambitieux d'une «guerre de libération régionale» ayant pour objectif de fédérer dix pays africains sous l'autorité du Président ougandais Yoweri Kaguta Museveni. Réunifiés, ces 10 pays devaient former une région vitrine dénommée « Grande Région Unifiée; Great United Region » et devant disposer d’une « Armée Rouge de Réserve ; Reserve Red Army » comptant 2.000.000 hommes et prête à assujettir le reste de l’Afrique subsaharienne. Ne tarissant pas d'éloges pour le chef de l'Allemagne nazie Adolf Hitler, Museveni entendait agir avec le soutien du Royaume-Uni et des Etats-Unis manifestement décidés à chasser la France de l'Afrique où ils espéraient en outre contrer l'influence des puissances émergentes comme la Chine et l'Inde et imposer un ordre politique, économique et militaire totalement anglo-saxon sur le continent africain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re Joinder Submitted by the Republic of Uganda
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING ARMED ACTIVITIES ON THE TERRITORY OF THE CONGO DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. UGANDA REJOINDER SUBMITTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA VOLUME 1 6 DECEMBER 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 : THE PERSISTENT ANOMALIES IN THE REPLY CONCERNING MATTERS OF PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ............................................... 10 A. The Continuing Confusion Relating To Liability (Merits) And Quantum (Compensation) ...................... 10 B. Uganda Reaffirms Her Position That The Court Lacks Coinpetence To Deal With The Events In Kisangani In June 2000 ................................................ 1 1 C. The Courl:'~Finding On The Third Counter-Claim ..... 13 D. The Alleged Admissions By Uganda ........................... 15 E. The Appropriate Standard Of Proof ............................. 15 CHAPTER II: REAFFIRMATION OF UGANDA'S NECESSITY TO ACT IN SELF- DEFENCE ................................................. 2 1 A. The DRC's Admissions Regarding The Threat To Uganda's Security Posed By The ADF ........................ 27 B. The DRC's Admissions Regarding The Threat To Uganda's Security Posed By Sudan ............................. 35 C. The DRC's Admissions Regarding Her Consent To The Presetnce Of Ugandan Troops In Congolese Territory To Address The Threats To Uganda's Security.. ......................................................................4 1 D. The DRC's Failure To Establish That Uganda Intervened
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Date: 30 October 2008
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Military Entrepreneurialism in the Ugandan-Congolese Borderland Koen Vlassenroot and Sandrine Perrot Summary Early August 19
    Military entrepreneurialism in the Ugandan-Congolese borderland Koen Vlassenroot and Sandrine Perrot Summary Early August 1998, Ugandan troops re-entered the Democratic Republic of Congo, as part of a joint strategy with Rwanda to oust the Congolese President Laurent-Désiré Kabila. Even if in May 2003 these troops officially left the DRC, Ugandan politico-military and commercial networks, including Ugandan politico-military leaderships, Ugandan and Congolese business people and Congolese rebel leaders, would continue to play a dominant role in the north- eastern parts of the DRC. This paper wants to illustrate how military intervention and these networks have shaped and reshaped existing patterns of transborder economic exchange and political processes. In most explanations of Uganda’s military involvement in the DR Congo conflict, these networks have taken central stage but have hardly been defined. In most accounts, these are considered as predatory forces and socially destructive forms of organisation, undermining political stability, the functioning of state institutions and economic efficiency in Uganda. This paper will argue that the informal political structures and networks linking Uganda’s political centre to Congo’s war complex can also be important tools for regime consolidation. Even if it can be argued that the military intervention caused a political crisis at the end of Uganda’s intervention, that it meant a loss of formal economic revenues and, as the different military confrontations between Ugandan and Rwandan troops in Kisangani reveal, that the state proved to have limited control over the military, on the longer term state authority was hardly affected. To comprehend this seeming paradox, it is crucial to get a better understanding of the particular links between the shadow networks of politico-military and economic control that became visible during the intervention, and the Ugandan regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the Rwanda-Uganda Alliance (1981-1999)
    African Studies Quarterly | Volume 15, Issue 2 | March 2015 The Rise and Fall of the Rwanda-Uganda Alliance (1981-1999) SCOTT McKNIGHT Abstract: This paper argues that the Rwanda-Uganda alliance began in the early 1980s as a pact of survival between Ugandan rebels and Rwandan exiles then living in Uganda, through the Rwandan and Ugandan military occupation of Congo, and concludes with the alliance’s violent breakup in late 1999. Using different alliance theories, this paper helps explain that the success of the Rwanda-Uganda alliance against the Mobutu regime had generated a “bandwagon” effect in the region. But the speed and success of this war paved over serious disagreements in strategy and clashes of personality within the Rwanda-Uganda alliance. It was not until the second war in Congo that these disagreements came to the surface; the alliance encountered fierce and unexpected resistance from states in the region, which joined together to “balance” and ultimately stymy the Rwanda-Uganda alliance’s second attempt at regime change in Congo. Drawing from interviews with high-ranking Ugandan and Rwandan officials, as well as numerous secondary sources, this paper argues that the Rwanda-Uganda alliance was beset by personality clashes between major players in the alliance, strategic disagreements over the ubiquitous “Congo question,” and zero-sum economic conflicts of interests, exemplified by the fighting between the Rwandan and Ugandan militaries at Kisangani, which marked the end of the alliance. Introduction: Some Key Questions of Alliance Theory How do states choose between allies and enemies? What forces bring states together or push them apart? Which level—systemic, domestic or individual—should we emphasize when understanding alliance dynamics? This paper examines the factors that brought Rwanda and Uganda together and ultimately which drove them apart, from their first cooperation as guerrillas in the early 1980s, culminating with their ugly breakup at the turn of the twentieth century as occupiers in a foreign land.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Competition in Africa: Explaining the Rwandan
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT—NOT THE VERSION OF RECORD. PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE WITHOUT THE AUTHOR’S PERMISSION. STATUS COMPETITION IN AFRICA: EXPLAINING THE RWANDAN- UGANDAN CLASHES IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO 1 HENNING TAMM ABSTRACT Yoweri Museveni’s rebels seized power in Uganda in 1986, with Rwandan refugees making up roughly a quarter of his troops. These refugees then took power in Rwanda in 1994 with support from Museveni’s regime. Subsequently, between 1999 and 2000, the Rwandan and Ugandan comrades-in-arms turned on each other in a series of deadly clashes in the Democratic Republic of Congo, a country they had invaded together only one year earlier. What explains these fratri- cidal clashes? This article contends that a social-psychological perspective focused on status competition between the Rwandan and Ugandan ruling elites provides the most compelling an- swer. Long treated as ‘boys’, the new Rwandan rulers strove to enhance their social status vis-à- vis the Ugandans, seeking first equality and then regional superiority. Economic disputes over Congo’s natural resources at times complemented this struggle for status but cannot explain all of its phases. The article draws on interviews with senior Rwandan, Ugandan, and former Con- golese rebel officials, and triangulates them with statements given to national and regional newspapers at the time of the clashes. More broadly, it builds on the recently revitalized study of status competition in world politics and makes a case for integrating research on inter-African relations. IN AUGUST 1999, AND AGAIN IN MAY AND JUNE 2000, Rwandan and Ugandan troops fought each other in Kisangani, a large city in north-eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusionary Elite Bargains and Civil War Onset: the Case of Uganda
    Working Paper no. 76 - Development as State-making - EXCLUSIONARY ELITE BARGAINS AND CIVIL WAR ONSET: THE CASE OF UGANDA Stefan Lindemann Crisis States Research Centre August 2010 Crisis States Working Papers Series No.2 ISSN 1749-1797 (print) ISSN 1749-1800 (online) Copyright © S. Lindemann, 2010 This document is an output from a research programme funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development. However, the views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. Crisis States Research Centre Exclusionary elite bargains and civil war onset: The case of Uganda Stefan Lindemann Crisis States Research Centre Uganda offers almost unequalled opportunities for the study of civil war1 with no less than fifteen cases since independence in 1962 (see Figure 1) – a number that makes it one of the most conflict-intensive countries on the African continent. The current government of Yoweri Museveni has faced the highest number of armed insurgencies (seven), followed by the Obote II regime (five), the Amin military dictatorship (two) and the Obote I administration (one).2 Strikingly, only 17 out of the 47 post-colonial years have been entirely civil war free. 7 NRA 6 UFM FEDEMO UNFR I FUNA 5 NRA UFM UNRF I FUNA wars 4 UPDA LRA LRA civil HSM ADF ADF of UPA WNBF UNRF II 3 Number FUNA LRA LRA UNRF I UPA WNBF 2 UPDA HSM Battle Kikoosi Maluum/ UNLA LRA LRA 1 of Mengo FRONASA 0 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Figure 1: Civil war in Uganda, 1962-2008 Source: Own compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business out of War. an Analysis of the UPDF's Presence in the Democratic Republic of Congo
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository Journal of Eastern African Studies Vol. 6, No. 1, February 2012, 2Á21 Doing business out of war. An analysis of the UPDF’s presence in the Democratic Republic of Congo Koen Vlassenroota*, Sandrine Perrotb and Jeroen Cuvelierc aConflict Research Group, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; bSciences Po, Centre d’e´tudes et de recherches internationales, Paris, France; cConflict Research Group, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium (Received 9 March 2011; final version received 25 January 2012) This paper analyses how Ugandan army commanders have mobilised transborder economic networks to exploit economic opportunities in eastern DRC during the military intervention of the Ugandan People’s Defence Force (UPDF) in Congo’s wars (1996Á97; 1998Á2003). These transborder networks are the starting point of our evaluation of the informal political structures and networks linking Uganda’s political centre to Congo’s war complex. While it is often claimed that military entrepreneurismalism in the DRC has undermined political stability in Uganda, we argue that the activities of Ugandan military entrepreneurs and networks under their control were an integral part of Uganda’s governance regime. Crucial to the development of this entrepreneurialism was the existence of pre-war transborder networks of economic exchange that were connecting Congo to eastern African markets. Military control over these highly informalised networks facilitated UPDF commanders’ access to Congo’s resources. Rather than operating as privatised sources of accumulation, these military shadow networks were directly linked to the inner circles of the Ugandan regime.
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA: Uncertain Peace Process Impedes Return in North While
    UGANDA: Uncertain peace process impedes return in north while protection crisis looms in Karamoja region A profile of the internal displacement situation 28 March, 2007 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Displacement Strategies in Civil Wars by Adam G. Lichtenheld
    Making Migrations: Population Displacement Strategies in Civil Wars by Adam G. Lichtenheld A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Ron Hassner, Chair Associate Professor Saira Mohamed Associate Professor Leonardo Arriola Associate Professor Aila Matanock Summer 2019 Making Migrations: Population Displacement Strategies in Civil Wars Copyright 2019 by Adam G. Lichtenheld 1 Abstract Making Migrations: Population Displacement Strategies in Civil Wars by Adam G. Lichtenheld Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Ron Hassner, Chair Why do armed groups uproot civilians in wartime? This dissertation identifies variation across civil wars in three population displacement strategies – cleansing, depopulation, and forced relocation – and tests different explanations for their use. I develop a new “assortative” theory of displacement, which argues that while some strategies (cleansing) aim to expel undesirable or disloyal populations, others (forced relocation, and perhaps depopulation) seek to identify the undesirables or the disloyal in the first place. When combatants lack information about opponents’ identities and civilians’ loyalties, they can use human mobility to infer wartime sympathies through “guilt by location.” Triggering displacement forces people to send costly and visible signals of loyalty based on whether, and where, they flee. This makes communities more “legible,” enabling combatants to use people’s movements as a continuous indicator of affiliation and allegiance; and to extract rents and recruits from the population. I therefore show that in some cases, displacement is attractive because it offers unique solutions to information and resource problems in civil wars by acting as a sorting mechanism and a force multiplier.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusionary Elite Bargains and Civil War Onset: the Case of Uganda
    Working Paper no. 76 - Development as State-making - EXCLUSIONARY ELITE BARGAINS AND CIVIL WAR ONSET: THE CASE OF UGANDA Stefan Lindemann Crisis States Research Centre August 2010 Crisis States Working Papers Series No.2 ISSN 1749-1797 (print) ISSN 1749-1800 (online) Copyright © S. Lindemann, 2010 This document is an output from a research programme funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development. However, the views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. Crisis States Research Centre Exclusionary elite bargains and civil war onset: The case of Uganda Stefan Lindemann Crisis States Research Centre Uganda offers almost unequalled opportunities for the study of civil war1 with no less than fifteen cases since independence in 1962 (see Figure 1) – a number that makes it one of the most conflict-intensive countries on the African continent. The current government of Yoweri Museveni has faced the highest number of armed insurgencies (seven), followed by the Obote II regime (five), the Amin military dictatorship (two) and the Obote I administration (one).2 Strikingly, only 17 out of the 47 post-colonial years have been entirely civil war free. 7 NRA 6 UFM FEDEMO UNFR I FUNA 5 NRA UFM UNRF I FUNA wars 4 UPDA LRA LRA civil HSM ADF ADF of UPA WNBF UNRF II 3 Number FUNA LRA LRA UNRF I UPA WNBF 2 UPDA HSM Battle Kikoosi Maluum/ UNLA LRA LRA 1 of Mengo FRONASA 0 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Figure 1: Civil war in Uganda, 1962-2008 Source: Own compilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Génocide Rwandais : Le Peuple Crie Justice !
    Génocide rwandais : Le peuple crie justice ! Mémorandum adressé au Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies Plaidoyer pour une enquête globale, objective et impartiale sur le génocide rwandais et ses conséquences : Résultats d'investigations menées par la Cellule de la Documentation & Sécurité du PARTENARIAT-INTWARI. Février 2008 1 Liste des abréviations et acronymes AFDL Alliance des Forces Démocratiques de Libération APR Armée Patriotique Rwandaise CDR Coalition pour la Défense de la République CVTD Convention de Vienne sur le droit des traités DIR Dialogue Inter Rwandais DMI Directorate of Military Intelligence EAC East African Community ESO External Security Organisation FAR Forces Armées Rwandaises FDC Forces Démocratiques de changement FOCA Forces Combattantes Abacunguzi FPR Front patriotique rwandais GTBE Gouvernement de transition à base élargie ICN Intelligence communications network IRC International Rescue Committee ISO Internal Security Organization ITT International Telephone and Telegraph JDR Jeunesse démocratique rwandaise MDR Mouvement démocratique républicain MINUAR Mission des nations Unies au Rwanda MONUOR Mission d’observation des Nations Unies en Ouganda et au Rwanda MRND Mouvement révolutionnaire national pour le développement NRM National Resistance Movement NRA National Resistance Army ONU Organisation des Nations Unies PDC Parti démocrate chrétien PL Parti Libéral PPU Presidential Protection Unit PSD Parti Social Démocrate RAGL Région de l’Afrique des Grands Lacs RDC République démocratique du Congo RDF Rwanda Defence
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda and Ituri, 2003
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Rethinking the Resource Curse: Natural Resources and Polywar in the Ituri District, Democratic Republic of the Congo Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/320469nv Author Fahey, Dan Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Rethinking the Resource Curse: Natural Resources and Polywar in the Ituri District, Democratic Republic of the Congo By Dan Fahey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Prof. Nancy Peluso, Chair Prof. Kate O’Neill Prof. Michael Watts Prof. Ron Hassner Fall 2011 Abstract Rethinking the Resource Curse: Natural Resources and Polywar in the Ituri District, Democratic Republic of the Congo By Dan Fahey Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Nancy Peluso, Chair This dissertation examines the people, events and processes that contributed to the onset and duration of war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with a focus on armed conflict in northeast Congo’s Ituri district. Building upon theories about the typology of war and critically engaging literature that depicts Congo’s wars as civil wars, I argue that war in Congo was a polywar of numerous internal and international conflicts taking place in the same geographic area. The concept of polywar helps to make sense of how several disparate armed conflicts coalesced in 1996 to produce a regional war that absorbed pre- existing conflicts and spawned new wars.
    [Show full text]