Norwegian Journal of Entomology DSSKRIFT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Diptera) of North-Eastern North America
Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36673 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e36673 Taxonomic Paper New Syrphidae (Diptera) of North-eastern North America Jeffrey H. Skevington‡,§, Andrew D. Young|, Michelle M. Locke‡, Kevin M. Moran‡,§ ‡ AAFC, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada § Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada | California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, United States of America Corresponding author: Jeffrey H. Skevington ([email protected]) Academic editor: Torsten Dikow Received: 31 May 2019 | Accepted: 09 Aug 2019 | Published: 03 Sep 2019 Citation: Skevington JH, Young AD, Locke MM, Moran KM (2019) New Syrphidae (Diptera) of North-eastern North America. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e36673. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e36673 ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:823430AD-B648-414F-A8B2-4F1E5F1A086A Abstract Background This paper describes 11 of 18 new species recognised in the recent book, "Field Guide to the Flower Flies of Northeastern North America". Four species are omitted as they need to be described in the context of a revision (three Cheilosia and a Palpada species) and three other species (one Neoascia and two Xylota) will be described by F. Christian Thompson in a planned publication. Six of the new species have been recognised for decades and were treated by J. Richard Vockeroth in unpublished notes or by Thompson in his unpublished but widely distributed "A conspectus of the flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of the Nearctic Region". Five of the 11 species were discovered during the preparation of the Field Guide. Eight of the 11 have DNA barcodes available that support the morphology. New information New species treated in this paper include: Anasimyia diffusa Locke, Skevington and Vockeroth (Smooth-legged Swamp Fly), Anasimyia matutina Locke, Skevington and This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. -
The Permo-Carboniferous Oslo Rift Through Six Stages and 65 Million Years
52 by Bjørn T. Larsen1, Snorre Olaussen2, Bjørn Sundvoll3, and Michel Heeremans4 The Permo-Carboniferous Oslo Rift through six stages and 65 million years 1 Det Norske Oljeselskp ASA, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Eni Norge AS. E-mail: [email protected] 3 NHM, UiO. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Inst. for Geofag, UiO. E-mail: [email protected] The Oslo Rift is the northernmost part of the Rotliegen- des basin system in Europe. The rift was formed by lithospheric stretching north of the Tornquist fault sys- tem and is related tectonically and in time to the last phase of the Variscan orogeny. The main graben form- ing period in the Oslo Region began in Late Carbonif- erous, culminating some 20–30 Ma later with extensive volcanism and rifting, and later with uplift and emplacement of major batholiths. It ended with a final termination of intrusions in the Early Triassic, some 65 Ma after the tectonic and magmatic onset. We divide the geological development of the rift into six stages. Sediments, even with marine incursions occur exclusively during the forerunner to rifting. The mag- matic products in the Oslo Rift vary in composition and are unevenly distributed through the six stages along the length of the structure. Introduction The Oslo Palaeorift (Figure 1) contributed to the onset of a pro- longed period of extensional faulting and volcanism in NW Europe, which lasted throughout the Late Palaeozoic and the Mesozoic eras. Widespread rifting and magmatism developed north of the foreland of the Variscan Orogen during the latest Carboniferous and contin- ued in some of the areas, like the Oslo Rift, all through the Permian period. -
Fagrapport Sykehuset Innlandet Deltema 6 Infrastruktur
ADRESSE COWI AS Karvesvingen 2 Postboks 6412 Etterstad 0605 Oslo TLF +47 02694 WWW cowi.no DESEMBER 2020 HELSE SØR-ØST RHF SAMFUNNSANALYSE SYKEHUSSTRUKTUR INNLANDET - DELTEMA INFRASTRUKTUR OPPDRAGSNR. DOKUMENTNR. A209187 - VERSJON UTGIVELSESDATO BESKRIVELSE UTARBEIDET KONTROLLERT GODKJENT 1.0 2020-12-03 Fagrapport Øystein Berge Marius Fossen Øystein Berge SAMFUNNSANALYSE SYKEHUSSTRUKTUR INNLANDET 2 DELTEMA INFRASTRUKTUR DOKUMENTINFORMASJON Rapporttittel: Samfunnsanalyse Sykehusstruktur Innlandet Deltema Infrastruktur Dato: 03.12.2020 Utgave: Endelig Oppdragsgiver: Helse Sør-Øst RHF Kontaktperson hos Rune Aarbø Reinaas Helse Sør-Øst RHF: Konsulent: COWI AS og Vista Analyse Prosjektleder hos Øystein Berge, COWI konsulent: Utarbeidet av: Øystein Berge Sidemannskontroll: Marius Fossen Godkjent av: Øystein Berge SAMFUNNSANALYSE SYKEHUSSTRUKTUR INNLANDET 3 DELTEMA INFRASTRUKTUR INNHOLD 1 Sammendrag 4 2 Innledning 5 2.1 Bakgrunn 5 2.2 Alternativene 6 2.3 0-alternativet 7 3 Metode og kunnskapsgrunnlag i denne fagrapporten 8 4 Dagens situasjon og beskrivelse av 0-alternativet 9 5 Konsekvenser av ulike alternativer 11 5.1 Alternativ Biri-Hamar 11 5.2 Alternativ Biri-Elverum 11 5.3 Alternativ Moelv-Lillehammer 12 5.4 Alternativ Moelv-Gjøvik 13 5.5 Alternativ Brumunddal-Lillehammer 13 5.6 Alternativ Brumunddal-Gjøvik 14 6 Samlet vurdering 15 7 Bibliography 16 SAMFUNNSANALYSE SYKEHUSSTRUKTUR INNLANDET 4 DELTEMA INFRASTRUKTUR 1 Sammendrag Det er lite som skiller alternativene fra hverandre. Alle stedene utnytter eksisterende og kommende infrastrukturen på en god måte. Alle alternativene for Mjøssykehuset vil utnytte den nye E6en, men kun Moelv og Brumunddal kan utnytte kan jernbaneforbindelsen, og kommer derfor bedre ut. Blant de fire byene som er aktuelle for akuttsykehus har alle jernbanetilgang. Men hyppigst avganger er det på Hamar og i Lillehammer. -
Revision of the Genus Apophua Morley, 1913, from Japan (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae)
Zootaxa 3784 (5): 501–527 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3784.5.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6640D1B6-E304-4C6B-8E36-71F8FB2C347F Revision of the genus Apophua Morley, 1913, from Japan (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Banchinae) KYOHEI WATANABE1 & KAORU MAETO2 1Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Iriuda 499, Odawara, Kanagawa 250–0031, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 2Laboratory of Insect Biodiversity and Ecosystem Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, 1–1 Rokkodai- cho, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657–8501 Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Japanese species of the genus Apophua Morley, 1913, are revised. Eleven species are found from Japan and two of them, A. elegans sp. nov. and A. yamato sp. nov., are newly described. Distribution data and an updated key to Japanese species are provided. Key words: Far East Asia, Glyptini, new species, parasitoid, taxonomy Introduction The genus Apophua Morley, 1913, is a medium-sized taxon of ichneumonid wasps of the tribe Glyptini, subfamily Banchinae, which contains 36 described species from the Afrotropical (13 spp.), Eastern Palaearctic (10), Oriental (10), Western Palaearctic (5), Nearctic (2), and Australasian (2) regions (Yu et al., 2012). The species in this genus are known as koinobiont endoparasitoids of lepidopteran larvae, particularly of leaf rollers (e.g. Tortricidae), and include some important natural enemies of forest pests (Kamijo, 1973; Momoi et al., 1975). We have studied the Japanese species of Apophua as part of a review of the Japanese Glyptini and have recognized 11 species. -
Vegliste Desember 2020
Vegliste 2020 TØMMERTRANSPORT Fylkes- og kommunale vegar Desember 2020 Vestland www.vegvesen.no/veglister Foto: Torbjørn Braset Adm.område / telefon / heimeside: Adm.område Telefon Heimeside Vestland fylkeskommune 05557 www.vlfk.no Alver 56 37 50 00 www.alver.kommune.no Askvoll 57 73 07 00 www.askvoll.kommune.no Askøy 56 15 80 00 www.askoy.kommune.no Aurland 57 63 29 00 www.aurland.kommune.no Austevoll 55 08 10 00 www.austevoll.kommune.no Austrheim 56 16 20 00 www.austrheim.kommune.no Bergen 55 56 55 56 www.bergen.kommune.no| Bjørnafjorden 56 57 50 00 www.bjornafjorden.kommune.no Bremanger 57 79 63 00 www.bremanger.kommune.no Bømlo 53 42 30 00 www.bomlo.kommune.no Eidfjord 53 67 35 00 www.eidfjord.kommune.no Etne 53 75 80 00 www.etne.kommune.no Fedje 56 16 51 00 www.fedje.kommune.no Fitjar 53 45 85 00 www.fitjar.kommune.no Fjaler 57 73 80 00 www.fjaler.kommune.no Gulen 57 78 20 00 www.gulen.kommune.no Gloppen 57 88 38 00 www.gloppen.kommune.no Hyllestad 57 78 95 00 www.hyllestad.kommune.no Kvam 56 55 30 00 www.kvam.kommune.no Kvinnherad 53 48 31 00 www.kvinnherad.kommune.no Luster 57 68 55 00 www.luster.kommune.no Lærdal 57 64 12 00 www.laerdal.kommune.no Masfjorden 56 16 62 00 www.masfjorden.kommune.no Modalen 56 59 90 00 www.modalen.kommune.no Osterøy 56 19 21 00 www.osteroy.kommune.no Samnanger 56 58 74 00 www.samnanger.kommune.no Sogndal 57 62 96 00 https://www.sogndal.kommune.no Solund 57 78 62 00 www.solund.kommune.no Stad 57 88 58 00 www.stad2020.no Stord 53 49 66 00 www.stord.kommune.no Stryn 57 87 47 00 www.stryn.kommune.no Sunnfjord -
ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV the World Fauna of the Genus Lathrolestes
DISSERTATIONES ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 The world fauna of the genus ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV The world fauna of the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Tartu 2015 ISSN 1024-6479 ISBN 978-9949-32-794-2 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV The world fauna of the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu Dissertation was accepted for the commencement of the degree of Doctor philosophiae in zoology at the University of Tartu on March 16, 2015 by the Scientific Council of the Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu. Supervisors: Tiit Teder, PhD, University of Tartu, Estonia Nikita Julievich Kluge, PhD, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia Opponent: Tommi Nyman, PhD, University of Eastern Finland, Finland Commencement: Room 301, 46 Vanemuise Street, Tartu, on May 26, 2015, at 10.15 a.m. Publication of this thesis is granted by the Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, and University of Tartu. Disclaimer: this dissertation is not issued for purpose of public and permanent scientific record, and remains unpublished for the purposes of zoological nomenclature (ICZN, 1999: 8.2.) ISSN 1024-6479 ISBN 978-9949-32-794-2 (print) ISBN 978-9949-32-795-9 (pdf) Copyright: Alexey Reshchikov, 2015 University of Tartu Press www.tyk.ee CONTENTS -
Hoverfly Newsletter 67
Dipterists Forum Hoverfly Newsletter Number 67 Spring 2020 ISSN 1358-5029 . On 21 January 2020 I shall be attending a lecture at the University of Gloucester by Adam Hart entitled “The Insect Apocalypse” the subject of which will of course be one that matters to all of us. Spreading awareness of the jeopardy that insects are now facing can only be a good thing, as is the excellent number of articles that, despite this situation, readers have submitted for inclusion in this newsletter. The editorial of Hoverfly Newsletter No. 66 covered two subjects that are followed up in the current issue. One of these was the diminishing UK participation in the international Syrphidae symposia in recent years, but I am pleased to say that Jon Heal, who attended the most recent one, has addressed this matter below. Also the publication of two new illustrated hoverfly guides, from the Netherlands and Canada, were announced. Both are reviewed by Roger Morris in this newsletter. The Dutch book has already proved its value in my local area, by providing the confirmation that we now have Xanthogramma stackelbergi in Gloucestershire (taken at Pope’s Hill in June by John Phillips). Copy for Hoverfly Newsletter No. 68 (which is expected to be issued with the Autumn 2020 Dipterists Forum Bulletin) should be sent to me: David Iliff, Green Willows, Station Road, Woodmancote, Cheltenham, Glos, GL52 9HN, (telephone 01242 674398), email:[email protected], to reach me by 20 June 2020. The hoverfly illustrated at the top right of this page is a male Leucozona laternaria. -
Minerals of the Axinite Group from Norwegian Localities
Minerals of the axinite group from Norwegian localities Fred Steinar Nordrum, Alf Olav Larsen og Muriel Erambert Introduction The mineral known today as axinite was first described by Schreiber in 1781, but thought to be a variety of schorl. During the next two decades the mineral was referred to under different names: violet schorl, yanolite, thumerstein, thumite and glasschorl. The name axinite was first applied by Hauy in 1799, in reference to the common axe-like shape of the crystals. The axinite group minerals are complex cyclosilicates. The three Ca-dominant end-members are ferroaxinite, manganaxinite and magnesia-axinite, named after the second most abundant cations, and with the general formula Ca4(Fe,Mn,Mg),AI4B2Sia030(OH),. Tinzenite has a Ca deficiency, compensated by an excess of Mn, and with the formula Ca2Mn.A14B2Sia030(OH),. The definition of ferroaxinite, manganaxinite and tinzenite was established by Sanero & Gollardi (1968), while magnesio-axinite was described by Jobbins et al. (1975). Axinite from Norway was first described by Schumacher (1801) who reported the mineral both from the silver deposits at Kongsberg and from Torbjlilrnsbo iron mine at Arendal. Keilhau (1838) mentioned axinite from Nikkerud iron mine near Drammen. Goldschmidt (1911) thoroughly described axinite from Arvoll near Oslo, and his chemical analysis showed that the mineral was close to the manganaxinite end member. He also mentioned another axinite locality at Arvoll, as well as Nikkerud (Aserud) near Drammen. Munster (1883) mentioned axinite from the Kongsberg silver deposits, while Neumann (1944) described axinite from several localities within the Kongsberg silver deposits, and published the chemical composition of an axinite from Golles Hulfe in der Noth mine (358 m level). -
The Hymenoptera of a Dry Meadow on Limestone
POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 47 1 29--47 1999 (Pol. J. Ecol.) W em er ULRICH Nicholas Copemicus University in Torun Department of Animal Ecology 87-100 Torun. Gagarina 9: Poland e-mail: ulrichw @ cc.uni.torun.pl 'I'HE HYMENOPTERA OF A DRY MEADOW ON LIMESTONE: SPECIES COMPOSITION, ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS ABSTRACT: In 1986 and 1988 the hymenopterous fauna of a semixerophytic meadow on lime stone near Gottingen (FRG) was studied using ground-photo-eclectors. A total of 4982 specimens be longing to 475 different species \vere collected. Extrapolations from double-log functions revealed that there may be as many as 1330 parasitoid species present per year. 455 of the 475 species were parasito ids. 155 of them attack dipterans. 48 lepidopterans. 36 beetles. 23 wasps, 22 plant hoppers and 13 ap hids. 47 of the species are egg-parasitoids and parasitoids of miners. ectophytophages count for 44 of 2 the \V asp species. The abundance of the wasp fauna was rather high ( 1120 ± 53 in d. m- a- I ( 1986) and 2 1 335 ± 42 ind. m - a- ( 1988). Most abundant were the parasitoids of miners, gall-makers and the egg parasitoids. Compared \vith the high abundance the biomass was low. In 1986 the wasps weighed a total 2 1 2 1 of 194 ± 24 n1gDW m- a- and in 1988 only 69 ± 20 mgDW m- a- . The parasitoids of ectophytopha gous lepidopterans and coleopterans counted for n1ore than half of the whole biomass. KEY WORDS: Hymenoptera. parasitoids. faunal composition, density, biomass. species numbers, local extinction. 1. INTRODUCTION The insect order Hymenoptera is the species is very limited. -
Intraspecific Variations of Idiosomal Setal Patterns of Phytoseiid Mites
J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn., 22(1): 25-36. May 25, 2013 © The Acarological Society of Japan http://www.acarology-japan.org/ 25 Intraspecific Variations of Idiosomal Setal Patterns of Phytoseiid Mites 1 2 Shingo TOYOSHIMA * and Hiroshi AMANO 1NARO Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science, Shimada, Shizuoka 428-8501, Japan 2Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan (Received 15 October 2012; Accepted 23 December 2012) ABSTRACT Intraspecific variation of idiosomal setal patterns was examined in field populations of eight phytoseiid species and in laboratory populations of Neoseiulus californicus and N. womersleyi. In field populations, about 6.4–16.1% of females showed setal variation, whereas in laboratory populations, this percentage was relatively low in N. californicus (5.8–14.8%) but high in N. womersleyi (8.6–36.1%). Setal variations were divided into the following categories: absent, additional, inserted, deviated, expanded, and shortened setae. An absence of setae was more common than additional or inserted setae, both in the field and laboratory populations. Expanded and shortened setae were rare. An absence of setae was frequently observed on the ventral opisthosoma, and occurred on both of its sides (left and right), mainly at ZV3 in N. womerwelyi and JV3 in Typhlodromus vulgaris. In the IG population of N. womersleyi, an absence of setae was frequently observed at ZV1 (49.5% of the total absent setae in the population) and ZV3 (37.8%), which was significantly different from the other populations. The difference in setal variation between field and laboratory populations suggests that it is not caused by accidental defects during post-embryonic development but rather is the result of heritable traits. -
Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3]. -
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying