WHAT HAPPENED at the 2015 SYNOD Part HH.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WHAT HAPPENED at the 2015 SYNOD Part HH.Pdf WHAT HAPPENED AT THE 2015 SYNOD? (PART HH) Here we will continue what we started to look at in PART GG of this series and that is the present opposition to our Holy Father and what he is doing and saying. The material comes from an article in the Italian newspaper, La Stamps (a Jesuit paper) from the October 16, 2016, issue; the article was written by Giaromo Galeazzi and Andrea Torniello from Rome. It deals with Catholics who are anti-Francis (who turn out to be more numerous than I have thought!). Unfortunately, my source as I have it here has no title; so I am sorry I cannot give you that! The opposition, unfortunately, is very real and a lot of the criticisms about the Pope shocked me! They are really eye-opening and for me, as a papal observer, many seem incredible but I leave that to your own judgment. The article is a good description and detailing of the journey to the world of Francis’ opponents, “where regionalists, Ratzinger nostalgics, and enemies of the Council [Vatican II] are joined by a common disapproval of the current Pope: ‘There is chaos in the church because of the Pope.’” (ibid.) And “the glue that holds them together is their aversion towards Francis. The world of Francis dissenters ranges from Lefebvrians [followers of Bishop Marcel Lefebvre – the Society of Saint Pius X] who have decided to ‘wait for a traditional Pope’ before renewing their communion with Rome [recall what we have already seen about them in these Consortium materials], to Catholic regionalists who compare Francis to his predecessor Ratzinger and promote the campaign ‘Benedict is my Pope.’” (ibid.) There are “websites that share sedavacantist positions [the idea that the papal chair remains empty/vacant because Francis is not a real pope]. These are adamant that the Catholic writer Antonio Socci was right to argue that Bergoglio’s [Francis] election is invalid simply because a vote was cancelled without a scrutiny in the March 2013 Conclave. This was because one of the cardinals mistakenly placed an extra ballot in the ballot box. The vote resumed immediately to wipe away any doubts and without any of the cardinal electors raising any objections… The opposition intensifies on the web, with people letting all fury loose protected by their computer screen … The ‘messainitaliano’ website, which promotes the old liturgy but also publishes vitriolic comments on the Pope, speaks about the ‘tedious ideological monotony of the current pontificate.’ On the web, one comes across comments about the Church eventually dissolving into some kind of a United Nations of religions with a touch of Greenpeace [a pro-ecological organization] and a hint of a trades union organization, given that ‘today, moral sins are downgraded and Bergoglio established social or socialist) sins as well.’” (ibid.) Traditionalists, conservative prelates, and conservative intellectuals have signed protests or appeals about Francis’ open pastoral attitude with regard for the Eucharist 1 for remarried divorcees and dialogue with the Chinese government; we have already seen some of what these are in the Consortium material already. “Opposition to the Pope unites people and groups that are very different among them” (ibid.). More gentle criticism, for example, comes from La Bussola Quotidiana, an on-line newspaper and the monthly newspaper Il Timone. “The Argentinian Pope is also reproached almost on a daily basis by LˊEspresso’s former Vatican affairs journalist Sandro Magister. Then there are the … mocking comments made by Maria Guarini in the Italian blog Chiesa e Postconcilio and the harsher criticisms made by ultra-traditionalist and sedevacantist groups, those who believe there has not been a worthy Pope since Pius XII.” (ibid.) The opposition to Pope Francis is quite widespread on the internet. “Those behind this opposition use the Internet and private meetings between clerics, combining frontal and public attacks with more articulate strategies. Alessandro Gnocchi, who writes for the Riscossa Cristiana and Unavox websites, is on the frontline of the web criticism against the Pope: ‘Bergoglio is systematically surrendering the Church to the world, the Church is becoming worldly. His pontificate is based on the brunt handling of power. Never has the faith been so debased.’” (ibid.) Fondazione Lepanto is a foundation that tries to protect the principles and institutions of Christian civilization. It is one of the cultural powerhouses of anti-Francis sentiment. “The foundation’s books combined with the Corrispondenza Romana news agency and the meetings held in the sitting room on the first floor, make it one of the headquarters of the anti-Bergoglio front. ‘The Church is going through one of the biggest moments of chaos in its history and the Pope is one of the causes of this,’ says historian and President of Fondazione Lepanto, Roberto De Mattei. ‘This chaos is above all to do with the Pope’s magisterium. Francis is not the solution but part of the problem.’ Opposition, De Mattei added, ‘is not just being expressed by these so-called traditionalist circles but extends to bishops and theologians who were trained according to the Ratzinger [Pope Benedict XVI] and Wojtyla [Saint Pope John Paul II] schools of thought.” (ibid.) We now come to the thorny question of the (retired) Pope Benedict XVI and (active) Pope Francis. We have already met Antonio Socci (above). “On his official Facebook page, Antonio Socci claims that Benedict XVI did not really want to resign but still considers himself Pope and wants in some way to share the ‘Petrine ministry’ [the papacy], with his successor; Ratzinger himself, however, has denied this interpretation” (ibid.). Benedict XVI has denied this interpretation more than once and has confirmed that his resignation is totally valid and has publicly shown his obedience to Pope Francis! Benedict’s secretary, Archbishop Georg Ganswein, has complicated the situation because publicly he has said that there are not two popes but an extended ministry, with an active member (Francis) and a contemplative member (Benedict). Socci has added that “one contrasts love and the truth (Bergoglio), while another sees them united 2 in God (Benedict).” “Among the many comments to these remarks, Paolo Soranno wrote: ‘Francis I seems to be serving God Rainbow [?] (who does not impose religious and moral principles) and not the Catholic God.’” (ibid.) What does this garbage mean? If you can figure it out, please let me know! People like De Mattei prefer to call their opposition “resistance” rather than “dissent.” “This resistance was recently expressed by 45 Catholic theologians and philosophers who criticized the apostolic exhortation ‘Amoris Laetitia’ and by 80 figures – who gradually turned into several thousand – including Catholic cardinals, bishops, and theologians, who made a declaration of ‘loyalty to the unchanging magisterium of the Church.’ One of the hotbeds of resistance, the historian [De Mattei] underlined, ‘is the John Paul II institute for the family, whose heads were recently removed by Bergoglio.’ Traditionalists are also targeting Francis for the part his migration policy is playing in destabilizing Europe and obliterating western civilization.” (ibid.) Oh, come on, now!! “The attack against Francis is global” (ibid.) There is a strong geopolitical element in this, according to Agostino Giovagnoli, Professor of Contemporary History at the Università Cattolica. “They are accusing Bergoglio of not proclaiming the truths of the faith with sufficient vigour but in reality they are blaming him for not defending the West’s primacy. This opposition has political motivations that are masked by theological and ecclesial questions. China is an example of this. There is an alliance between Hong Kong circles, sectors within the United States and Europe’s right wing: they are accusing Francis of putting the goal of uniting the Church in China before the defense of religious freedom … These critics say the Pope should affirm religious freedom as a political argument against Beijing [China] instead of seeking dialogue through diplomatic means.” (ibid.) Opposition to Pope Francis also exists in the Curia, as we saw in earlier Consortium materials. This also finds voice in clerics with Vatican connections, e.g., the liturgist and theologian Father Nicola Bux who is a consultant to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Office of Liturgical Celebrations. Father Bux has stated “today, there are a few lay people, priests, and bishops asking themselves where we are headed … The Pope’s job is to safeguard ecclesial communion, not to favour division and rivalry, siding with progressives against the conservatives.” More, a researcher who is very traditional, Flavio Cuniberto wrote a book criticizing Francis’ social magisterium and recently launched a protest in, the Italian newspaper, Il Giornale where he stated that “Bergoglio has not updated Catholic doctrine, he has destroyed it and acts as though he is a Catholic but is in fact not: the distorted idea of poverty elevates old pauperism to the dogmatic sphere. The Pope praises recycling and thus the virtues of the good late-modern consumer become the new evangelical virtues.” Parenthetically, I hope by now you have noticed how often these opponents of Francis disrespect the Pope by using his last name (“Bergoglio”) to designate him!! And I had a very hard time inserting Cuniberto’s nonsense into these materials because his comments are so biased and make no sense within any Christian/Catholic context! 3 “The opposition comes from the more conservative side of the spectrum but also finds a voice among some disappointed ultra-progressives” (ibid.) If you know anything about Maria Guarini, an ultra-traditional blogger, you would expect an inane statement like “if the next Pope is Bergoglian, the Vatican will become a Cathomasonic branch”! However, some of the ultra-progressive opponents also say very harsh things about Pope Francis.
Recommended publications
  • Febrero 2015
    REVISTA UNA VOCE INFORMA Publicación religiosa mensual, dedicada a la promoción y defensa de la Doctrina y Liturgia Tradicional Católica. “Por el triunfo del Inmaculado Corazón de María y el establecimiento del reinado social del Corazón de Jesús en las almas y en la entera sociedad.” No. 42 Febrero del 2015. Año IV. ¿Dónde encontrar todo el material litúrgico y religioso que necesito? Sr. Daniel Eduardo Olguín Ramos https://www.facebook.com/rosariosniph E-Mail: [email protected] Móvil: 4455 4387 0080 Las ofertas a disposición incluyen desde piezas de tela y tejidos, orfebrería, a objetos devocionales. Ornamentos, bonetes españoles o romanos, bandas, sotanas, capas pluviales, casullas, dalmatitas, campanas, custodias, cálices, copones, relicarios, tecas, palias, amitos, rosarios, lienzos de altar, Candelabros, Sagrarios, Manteles, Frontales y mucho, pero muchísimo mas… ¡Descúbralo, usted, mismo! UNA VOCE INFORMA. - Veritatis Catholicae defensor acerrimus - Esta revista ha sido construida sobre cimientos de fe. La esencia de la Evangelización es decirles a todos, cuánto les aman los Corazones de Jesús y de María. ¡Todos estamos llamados a ser grandes santos, no perdamos la oportunidad! Índice de la edición. Febrero/2015. -Editorial… Pág. 3 -Calendario Romano. Pág. 5 -La Misa de siempre explicada paso a paso. Pág. 6 -Oh belleza, siempre antigua y siempre nueva. Pág. 7 -La Sagrada Eucaristía y la forja del carácter. Pág. 8 -La doctrina Católica sobre la Eucaristía y el protestan- tismo. Pág. 9 -Por qué no voy a la ordenación del nuevo Obispo? Pág. 13 -De La Imitación de Cristo. Pág. 15 -San Francisco de Sales y las Almas Benditas del Purga- torio.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR LADY of FATIMA Traditional Latin Mass Roman Catholic Church
    OUR LADY OF FATIMA Traditional Latin Mass Roman Catholic Church SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X — SUNDAY IN THE OCTAVE OF CHRISTMAS — Rev. Fr. Richard Brueggemann Pastor Our Lady of Fatima: Fr. Richard Brueggemann Our Lady of Mount Carmel: Third and Peach St. Isidore 3900 Scruggs Drive PO Box 141 32100 E. Colfax Avenue, Service Road N. Richland Hills, TX 76180 Sanger, TX 76266 Watkins, CO 80137 www.olmcnrh.com www.sangercatholic.com E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (817) 284-4809 Phone: (940) 458-7344 Phone: (303) 775-9263 Sunday in the Octave of Christmas December 29th, 2019 Fr. Richard Brueggemann, Pastor Eucharistic Crusade Intention for the Month of January: For Persecuted and Abandoned Christians Collections Report Sunday General Collection 12/22 $1,231.00 12/25 $1,826.00 Mass Attendance 12/22 142 12/25 129 Mass Schedule Sanger – Our Lady of Fatima ~ January ~ Wednesday, 1st: Mass (Octave Day of the Nativity)…………........1 PM —Holy Day of Obligation First Friday, 3rd: Mass……………………………………………...6 PM —Followed by the rosary and benediction Sunday, 5th: Mass (The Most Holy Name of Jesus)…...……...1 PM Saturday, 11th: Mass………………………………..…..………...5 PM Sunday, 12th: Mass (The Feast of the Holy Family)…………...1 PM Sunday, 19th: Mass……………………………………………...1 PM North Richland Hills – Our Lady of Mt. Carmel ~ January ~ Wednesday, 1st: Mass (Octave Day of the Nativity)……………............................9 AM —Holy Day of Obligation Thursday, 2nd: Mass………………………………………………………….7:15 AM First Saturday, 4th: Mass……………………………………………………...………5 PM —Followed by the rosary and benediction Sunday, 5th: Mass (The Most Holy Name of Jesus)…………………………...9 AM Sunday, 12th: Mass (The Feast of the Holy Family)…………….……………..9 AM Saturday, 18th: Mass……………………………………………………………...5 PM Sunday, 19th: Mass……………………………………………………………..9 AM SATURDAYS AND SUNDAYS CONFESSIONS BEGIN 1 HOUR BEFORE MASS UNLESS OTHERWISE LISTED VISITING PRIEST TODAY: Please welcome Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015)
    Dowry – Catholic periodical by the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015) Dowry(N°27, Autumn 2015) “O Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and our most gracious Queen and Mother, look down in mercy upon England thy Dowry.”(Cardinal Wiseman) (Picture: A priest from our Fraternity blesses a family home at our parish in Umuaka, Imo State, in Nigeria. In response to Pope Francis’ appeal for prayers to be offered during the Synod on the Family in Rome, the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St Peter will add a special prayer to that intention at Holy Masses offered from 4 to 25 October.) In this issue: Editorial: Stepping Stones A gentle switch to sixth gear The Most Holy Eucharist as Judgment Voices from Versailles I am Margaret: fiction or reality? She walked for life Boys’ Summer Camp in the New Forest Fifteen more workers to the Vineyard Year of Mercy Retreats Past & Forthcoming events Support our seminarians & our apostolate 1 Dowry – Catholic periodical by the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter (N°27, Autumn 2015) Editorial: Stepping stones ear Friends, we are pleased to share with you the good remember that you can revisit our history with news of the forthcoming expansion of the Priestly many more details and pictures via the online D Fraternity of St Peter in Our Lady’s Dowry. At the series of Dowry magazines beginning of the Summer, after a meeting with Archbishop (www.lms.org.uk/news-and-events/fssp- Malcolm McMahon, O.P., of Liverpool, His Grace issued the magazine).
    [Show full text]
  • Jews, Radical Catholic Traditionalists, and the Extreme Right
    “Artisans … for Antichrist”: Jews, Radical Catholic Traditionalists, and the Extreme Right Mark Weitzman* The Israeli historian, Israel J. Yuval, recently wrote: The Christian-Jewish debate that started nineteen hundred years ago, in our day came to a conciliatory close. … In one fell swoop, the anti-Jewish position of Christianity became reprehensible and illegitimate. … Ours is thus the first generation of scholars that can and may discuss the Christian-Jewish debate from a certain remove … a post- polemical age.1 This appraisal helped spur Yuval to write his recent controversial book Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Yuval based his optimistic assessment on the strength of the reforms in Catholicism that stemmed from the adoption by the Second Vatican Council in 1965 of the document known as Nostra Aetate. Nostra Aetate in Michael Phayer’s words, was the “revolution- ary” document that signified “the Catholic church’s reversal of its 2,000 year tradition of antisemitism.”2 Yet recent events in the relationship between Catholics and Jews could well cause one to wonder about the optimism inherent in Yuval’s pronouncement. For, while the established Catholic Church is still officially committed to the teachings of Nostra Aetate, the opponents of that document and of “modernity” in general have continued their fight and appear to have gained, if not a foothold, at least a hearing in the Vatican today. And, since in the view of these radical Catholic traditionalists “[i]nternational Judaism wants to radically defeat Christianity and to be its substitute” using tools like the Free- * Director of Government Affairs, Simon Wiesenthal Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crux of the Matter (1984)
    The Crux of the Matter (1984) by Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn Why an April ’83 crisis happened in SSPX, and why it keeps on happening. BEWILDERED is probably the best word to describe the reaction of the faithful to the April break-up of the Society. My impres- sion, even now, is that the faithful who have read the positions of both sides are clear in their minds about the particular issues, but still do not understand just how the whole dispute started. Their impression of the Society, at least in the Northeast District, was one of harmony, steady growth, and optimism. By the Spring of 1983, the seminary had achieved its peak in growth rate, both from the point of view of new vocations and physical expansion. The laity were enthusiastic and forward-looking; people were confident that their spiritual needs would be met by the ever-expanding and apparently trouble-free Society of Saint Pius X. December, 1982, brought in $60,000 to the Seminary building fund; January $50,000. To my disbelief, it seemed that we were going to get through the first part of our contract with- out having to borrow a cent. Never had there been such a surge in new vocations; never had it looked so good for the Fall semes- ter. Had things been normal this past year, I estimate that we would have accepted 20 to 25 new candidates. Then disaster struck, like the tornado that descends swiftly but silently from the somber, sultry cloud upon its unsuspecting victims. Accusations were hurled, priests were thrown out on to the street, seminarians left.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Davies an Evaluation
    MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION CLICK HERE TO BUY A HARD COPY OF THIS BOOK “To the best of my knowledge, no one has been able to point out a theologi- cal error in any of my books.” (Michael Davies, The Angelus , March 1984) “All my writing is governed by one criterion only, the truth.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 30 th November 1988) “I have now written four books, fourteen pamphlets, and countless articles, exposing the deficiencies of the post-Vatican II liturgical revolution. No one has, as yet, been able to point out any factual or doctrinal error in any of them.” (Michael Davies, The Remnant , 15th May 1989) MICHAEL DAVIES AN EVALUATION NEW EDITION JOHN S. DALY First edition 1989 This edition © copyright John S. Daly 2015 ISBN 978-2-917813-51-5 TRADIBOOKS ROUCHAS SUD 47180 SAINT -SAUVEUR DE MEILHAN , FRANCE http://www.tradibooks.com – [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS VII INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW 2015 EDITION IX INTRODUCTION XI I. DAVIES’S ATTITUDE TO AUTHORITY 23 II. SHOCKINGLY SLIPSHOD SCHOLARSHIP 55 III. THE VACANCY OF THE HOLY SEE 92 APPEN DI X : SUAREZ ON THE HERETICAL PO PE 148 IV. DISHONESTY, INCONSISTENCY AND ARROGANCE 164 V. WHICH SIDE IS MICHAEL DAVIES ON? 191 VI. MISCELLANEOUS DOCTRINAL ERRORS 255 VII. THE SOCIETY OF ST. PIUS X 273 VIII. DAVIES AS AN ANARCHIST 290 IX. ERRORS OF SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY 314 (A) THE O RDERS OF ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE 316 (B) THE 1968 NEW R ITE OF O RDINATION 355 (C) VALIDITY AND “S IGNIFICATIO EX A DJUNCTIS ” 396 (D) VALIDITY OF THE NOVUS ORDO MISSÆ 409 X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See, Social Justice, and International Trade Law: Assessing the Social Mission of the Catholic Church in the Gatt-Wto System
    THE HOLY SEE, SOCIAL JUSTICE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: ASSESSING THE SOCIAL MISSION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE GATT-WTO SYSTEM By Copyright 2014 Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma Submitted to the graduate degree program in Law and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D) ________________________________ Professor Raj Bhala (Chairperson) _______________________________ Professor Virginia Harper Ho (Member) ________________________________ Professor Uma Outka (Member) ________________________________ Richard Coll (Member) Date Defended: May 15, 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE HOLY SEE, SOCIAL JUSTICE, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW: ASSESSING THE SOCIAL MISSION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE GATT- WTO SYSTEM by Fr. Alphonsus Ihuoma ________________________________ Professor Raj Bhala (Chairperson) Date approved: May 15, 2014 ii ABSTRACT Man, as a person, is superior to the state, and consequently the good of the person transcends the good of the state. The philosopher Jacques Maritain developed his political philosophy thoroughly informed by his deep Catholic faith. His philosophy places the human person at the center of every action. In developing his political thought, he enumerates two principal tasks of the state as (1) to establish and preserve order, and as such, guarantee justice, and (2) to promote the common good. The state has such duties to the people because it receives its authority from the people. The people possess natural, God-given right of self-government, the exercise of which they voluntarily invest in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Society of Saint Pius X Telephone: (01) 284 2206 Very Rev
    The Priestly Society of Saint Pius X in Ireland Saint Pius X House 12 Tivoli Terrace South Dún Laoghaire, County Dublin The Society of Saint Pius X Telephone: (01) 284 2206 Very Rev. Ramón Anglés, Superior Bulletin for Ireland Rev. Régis Babinet Saint John’s Presbytery Corpus Christi Priory 1 Upper Mounttown Road Connaught Gardens Dún Laoghaire, Co. Dublin Athlone, Co. Roscommon Telephone: (01) 280 9407 Telephone: (090) 649 2439 Resident Priest: Resident Priests: Rev. Paul Biérer Rev. Craig Bufé Rev. Greig Gonzales CONTACT Saint Pius V Chapel 78 Andersonstown Road Dún Laoghaire or Belfast, Co. Antrim Mr. McKeown (048) 9445 3654 Our Lady of the Rosary Church Shanakiel Road Athlone or Sunday’s Well, Co. Cork Mr. O’Connor (021) 437 1196 Our Lady of Knock and St Patrick Chapel Unit 5 Richbrook Business Park, Dún Laoghaire or Mill Rd, Bessbrook, Newry, Co. Down Mr. McArdle (048) 3082 5730 Our Lady of Fatima Chapel Athlone or Kesh, Co. Fermanagh Dr. Bastian (048) 6863 1169 Saint Joseph’s Mass Centre Athlone or Tralee, Co. Kerry Mrs. Dennehy (068) 43123 Cashel Mass Centre Athlone or Apparition of Our Lady in Knock Co. Tipperary Mr. Walsh (062) 61028 Galway Mass Centre Athlone September 2006 Chapel of new Clinic by N6 Co. Galway Website : www.ireland.sspx.net Devotions & Activities at St John’s followed him to Clonard, accompanied by her calf. Not wishing to take both the Rosary daily at 6 pm cow and the calf, Kieran used his staff to draw a line on the ground between the Every Sunday: Exposition and Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament at 10.30 am animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Concerning an SSPX Dossier on Sedevacantism
    CONCERNING A SSPX DOSSIER ON SEDEVACANTISM, BY REV. DOMINIQUE BOULET, SSPX. by John Lane “The Society admits the possibility of discussion regarding whatever explanation it may advance with regard to the nature of John Paul II's authority.” (Sedevacantism: A False Solution to a Real Problem, Angelus Press, Kansas, 2003, p. 22) This is a step-by-step consideration and refutation of the little book by Fr. Dominique Boulet of the SSPX, entitled, Sedevacantism. It is presented in the spirit of fraternal charity, in acceptance of the invitation extended by the priests of the Italian District of the SSPX in 2003, to discuss the “problem of the Pope.” Our first task is to say what the sedevacantist thesis actually is. If we were to summarise Archbishop Lefebvre’s position, we could describe it as a minimalist approach to the mystery of this crisis. That is, he combined two principles: 1. We must obey God rather than men. It is licit to resist a superior who commands something sinful, because it is never lawful to sin for any reason. 2. We must not tempt God by taking extraordinary actions unless absolutely necessary. Thus St. Thomas More waited until after he was condemned to death before openly criticising the schismatic actions of Henry VIII. (And some traditionalists would doubtless have accused More of liberalism for this silence!) If I were to define the sedevacantist thesis, I would also say that I agree that we must be minimalist, and thus be prepared to leave mysteries as mysteries if there are no clear answers, and we must be humble, and admit that we do not necessarily have the complete solution to every problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Alternative Popes*
    Modern Alternative Popes* Magnus Lundberg Uppsala University The Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) is arguably the most important event in modern Catholicism, and a major act on the twentieth-century religious scene at large. On several points, the conciliar fathers made changes in how the Catholic Church perceived the modern world. The language in the decrees was different from earlier councils’, and the bishops opened up for ecumenism and interreligious dialogue, seeing at least “seeds of truth” in other religious traditions. The conciliar fathers also voted in favour of liberty of religion, as meaning something more than the right to practise Catholic faith. A very concrete effect of the Council was the introduction of the New Mass Order (Novus Ordo Missae) in 1969 that replaced the traditional Roman rite, decreed by Pius V in 1570. Apart from changes in content, under normal circumstances, the new mass should be read in the vernacular, not in Latin as before. Though many Catholics welcomed the reforms of Vatican II, many did not. In the period just after the end of the Council, large numbers of priests and nuns were laicized, few new priest candidates entered the seminaries, and many laypeople did not recognize the church and the liturgy, which they had grown up with. In the post- conciliar era, there developed several traditionalist groups that criticized the reforms and in particular the introduction of the Novus Ordo. Their criticism could be more or less radical, and more or less activist. Many stayed in their parishes and attended mass there, but remained faithful to traditional forms of devotions and paid much attention to modern Marian apparitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf (Accessed January 21, 2011)
    Notes Introduction 1. Moon, a Presbyterian from North Korea, founded the Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity in Korea on May 1, 1954. 2. Benedict XVI, post- synodal apostolic exhortation Saramen- tum Caritatis (February 22, 2007), http://www.vatican.va/holy _father/benedict_xvi/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_ben-xvi _exh_20070222_sacramentum-caritatis_en.html (accessed January 26, 2011). 3. Patrician Friesen, Rose Hudson, and Elsie McGrath were subjects of a formal decree of excommunication by Archbishop Burke, now a Cardinal Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signa- tura (the Roman Catholic Church’s Supreme Court). Burke left St. Louis nearly immediately following his actions. See St. Louis Review, “Declaration of Excommunication of Patricia Friesen, Rose Hud- son, and Elsie McGrath,” March 12, 2008, http://stlouisreview .com/article/2008-03-12/declaration-0 (accessed February 8, 2011). Part I 1. S. L. Hansen, “Vatican Affirms Excommunication of Call to Action Members in Lincoln,” Catholic News Service (December 8, 2006), http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0606995.htm (accessed November 2, 2010). 2. Weakland had previously served in Rome as fifth Abbot Primate of the Benedictine Confederation (1967– 1977) and is now retired. See Rembert G. Weakland, A Pilgrim in a Pilgrim Church: Memoirs of a Catholic Archbishop (Grand Rapids, MI: W. B. Eerdmans, 2009). 3. Facts are from Bruskewitz’s curriculum vitae at http://www .dioceseoflincoln.org/Archives/about_curriculum-vitae.aspx (accessed February 10, 2011). 138 Notes to pages 4– 6 4. The office is now called Vicar General. 5. His principal consecrator was the late Daniel E. Sheehan, then Arch- bishop of Omaha; his co- consecrators were the late Leo J.
    [Show full text]
  • „Principele Scortesco”. Cine Era? (Cu O Incursiune În Peisajul Catolic Tradiţionalist Din Apus)
    1 Un român exilat misterios: „Principele Scortesco”. Cine era? (cu o incursiune în peisajul catolic tradiţionalist din Apus) P. dr. Remus Mircea Birtz, OBSS Summary This study presents some data about the Romanian Traditional Catholic writers, the painter Paul Scorţescu / Scortesco / Scortzesco (1893, Yassy – 1976, Paris), his brother the diplomatic minister Theodor Scorţescu / Scortzesco (1895, Yassy – 1979, Buenos-Aires), known in the Romanian literature, and Miss Myra Davidoglou (1923, Bucharest – 2001, France) a graphic artist too. Some historical and genealogical data about the Scortzesco Moldavian-Romanian noble family are given, and a short landscape of the Traditional Catholic Resistance. It is proven that the well-known statement of Paul Scortzesco about the 1963 Conclave cannot be true, however without denying the election of Cardinal Giuseppe Siri as Pope (Gregory XVII) in the 1958 Conclave. Some biographical data about the Scortzescos can and must be certainly corrected, when new informations from the yet unknown Romanian Exile Culture will be available. Key words: Paul Scorţescu / Scortesco / Scortzesco (1893-1976), Theodor Scorţescu / Scortzesco (1895-1979), Myra Davidoglou (1923-2001), Cardinal Giuseppe Siri (Gregory XVII), Roman Catholic Resistance, Sedevacantism, Romanian Exile. N.B. Studiul a fost prezentat la Simpozionul De la elitele Securităţii la securitatea elitelor organizat de Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, în 31.III. – 1.IV. 2017, distinsă cu Premiul I, fiind aşteptată publicarea lui în volumul omonim, aflat sub tipar. Dacă Rezistenţa Catolică din România împotriva comunismuluia fost şi este deja amplu investigată şi descrisă, Rezistenţa Catolică din Apusul Europei este practice necunoscută cititorilor români, desi membri marcanţi ai Acesteia au fost şi credincioşi catolici români exilaţi.
    [Show full text]