Uganda: Conflict Assessment Report for the Months of October 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uganda: Conflict Assessment Report for the Months of October 2017 UGANDA: CONFLICT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTHS OF OCTOBER 2017 Issue date: 16th November 2017 Disclaimer This publication was produced for review by the United State Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Supporting Access to Justice, Fostering Equity & Peace (SAFE) Program. The author’s views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. National Overview Conflict monitors who reported conflict incidents in their communities this month were from the districts of Dokolo, and Kitgum in Northern Uganda; Jinja, Iganga, Kamuli, Pallisa and Mbale in Eastern Uganda; and Kyegegwa, Rukungiri, Masindi, and Bullisa in Western Uganda. Conflict monitors report these conflict incidents to SAFE’s conflict monitoring database using a toll free SMS service. The SAFE program has more than five hundred (500) volunteer conflict monitors countrywide. 44% of the conflict incidents reported this month to SAFE’s conflict monitoring database were politically related conflicts. This can be attributed to the on-going countrywide national consultations on the removal of the presidential age limit from the Uganda Constitution. Under the existing constitution (article 102b), a person standing for president must be under seventy five (75) years of age - which would make President Yoweri Museveni, 73, ineligible to stand in the next polls in 2021. The move to amend the constitution has met widespread opposition from civil rights activists, opposition politicians and religious leaders. During the consultation meetings, tension has run very high and there have been incidents of violence like in Rukungiri District in western Uganda where one person was shot dead during a consultation meeting and many injured.1 In other areas, the Members of Parliament (MPs) have been assaulted and had to flee for their lives from hostile residents who are opposed to lifting of the presidential age limit and this has forced some to either cut back their countryside consultative meetings or make public commitments to abide by the wishes of their constituents not to support the proposed amendment.2 Security personnel in every district have been ordered to ensure that whoever is holding a consultative meeting, whether for or against the bill, is protected following clashes. SAFE’s conflict monitors will continue to monitor the situation countrywide. 38% of the conflict incidents reported where related to land disputes. Land conflicts in Uganda have become rampant. With rapidly growing population, the demand for land has increased in turn heightening land disputes. 1 See Western Region Section of this reporter 2 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitors-Dokolo, Iganga, Mbale, Kyegegwa, Jinja, Rukungiri, Masindi Districts 1 For instance, in Buliisa District in Western Uganda, a conflict monitor reported mounting tension between residents of Ngwedo Sub County, Nile Parish, Kasenyo Village and an Oil company (Total) which wants to take over residents’ land but is giving them inadequate compensation.3 Other conflict monitors in Kyegegwa District in western Uganda and Pallisa in Eastern Uganda reported land conflict incidents that resulted in attacks and injuries among the conflicting parties. In both incidents, police had to intervene to calm the situation although tension remains very high. Land is an important economic asset and source of livelihoods; it is also linked closely linked to community identity, history and culture. It is imperative that leaders take proactive measures to ensure growing tensions over land are resolved to prevent violent attacks including train communities on managing tensions over land and increasing knowledge about land policy and legal literacy within local communities. The GOU should ensure prompt and adequate compensation to affected communities. The GOU in September 2016 established a commission of inquiry into land issues in Uganda headed by Lady Justice Catherine Bamugemereire. The Commission seeks to find a solution to the land-related challenges in the country and is expected to table a comprehensive report that provides a sustainable solution. 4 Other incidents reported, revolved around crime and robbery, fighting within the Muslim community, poor service delivery, and domestic and gender based violence. 3 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitor-Buliisa District 4 http://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National/-Land-ProbeCommittee-Catherine-Bamugemereire-Museveni/688334-3957430- 9liuigz/index.html 2 Below: Number of Reported Conflict Incidents- October 2017 Source: SAFE Conflict Monitoring Database: October 2017 Regional Overview Northern Region Tension is very high in Amuru district following a long standing land conflict at Apaa (Zoka Village) between Amuru and Adjumani Districts. Both districts are claiming the land that is about forty (40) square miles. The SAFE program has repeatedly written about this conflict.5 This month GOU finally handed over the contested piece of land to Adjumani District amidst heavy deployment saying the decision was based on the 1958 map that was drawn before Uganda got independence in 1962.6 This decision has infuriated the residents of Amuru district, who have vowed not to respect GOU’s decision. 5 USAID SAFE Monthly Conflict Assessment Reports; May 2014; Jan, March, April, September 2015; March & June 2017 6 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitors-Amuru & Adjumani District 3 There is fear that ethnic tension might escalate as the residents of Amuru are from the Acholi ethinic group while those of Adjumani District are of the Madi ethnic group. Prior to the conflict, the two communities had lived in harmony. Each community is now living in trepidation of the other and fear to cross the Zoka river boundary for fear of being attacked.7 The conflict has experience a history of violence with killing, torching of huts and injury. In April 2015, a group of female elders from the region undressed before a host of cabinet ministers who had gone to the area to demarcate the land. In Northern Uganda, the act of undressing in public is one of the highest forms of protest against real or perceived injustice. Security personnel from the police and army have been heavily deployed in the area, to prevent any attacks. USAID SAFE’s conflict monitors in the area and the recently appointed project officer based in Gulu district will continue to monitor the situation on the ground and report any incidents to SAFE’s conflict monitoring database Eastern Region Tension is rising among the Muslim community in Kamuli District following a dispute over a yet to be completed multi million one thousand seater Mosque that is being built by funders from the Middle East.8 Two factions of the Muslim sect; one aligned to the Kibuli- based Muslim faction and another aligned to the Old Kampala Muslim faction are claiming ownership of the Mosque. The two groups have been at loggerheads over property disputes with the Kibuli group accusing the Old Kampala (where the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council is based) group of improperly disposing off Muslim property.9 During the scuffle in Kamuli District, one person was killed after being hit with a piece of wood and several others were injured.10 To calm the situation and prevent further violence, the police have indefinitely suspended anyone from accessing the Mosque. There has been a long history of Muslims fighting over mosques in Uganda which has resulted into violent incidents including Nakasero Mosque in Kampala,11 Masaka Mosque, 12 and Nateete 7 ibid 8 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitor-Kamuli District 9 https://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1320123/kibuli-muslim-factions-set-terms-reconciliation 10 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitor-Kamuli District 11 https://www.newvision.co.ug/new_vision/news/1135658/muslims-fight-mosque 12 https://ugandaradionetwork.com/story/muslim-factions-fight-to-control-masaka-central-mosque 4 Mosque among others.13 The two groups should be encouraged to dialogue in order to avoid the conflict from escalating. The Kamuli-based USAID SAFE conflict monitors will continue to monitor the situation in the district and report any incidents to SAFE’s conflict monitoring database. Western Region Tension is very high in Rukungiri District following the killing of one person during protests over the attempts to amend the presidential age limit in Uganda’s constitution.14 It all started when police blocked all routes heading to Rukungiri municipal stadium where, the area MP, Roland Mugume Kaginda was to address a consultative rally. However, police fired teargas and live bullets in the air to disperse supporters who arrived in large groups wearing red ribbons and singing, 'Otagikwataho', meaning “don't dare touch it”. This is in reference to Article 102(b) of the constitution which sets 35 and 75 years respectively, as minimum and maximum age caps for a president. It was in the process that one young man was killed and many others including policemen were seriously injured. In order to calm the situation, the area District Police Commander (who lost an eye in the fracas) was transferred from the district and the President of Uganda sent a condolence message to the deceased’s family.15 However residents are demanding that the police officer who shot should be arrested and faces the law.16 A conflict monitor from the district has written to the SAFE program to intervene by conducting training on conflict sensitive leadership and reconciliation of leaders of the different political shades in the district in order to calm the situation. 13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TEwVVXOyB0 14 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitor-Rukungiri District 15 http://theinsider.ug/index.php/2017/10/22/kayihura-sacks-rukungiri-dpc-after-losing-his-eye/ 16 USAID SAFE Conflict Monitor –Rukungiri District 5 Map of Uganda Showing The Conflict Hotspots As Highlighted In This Report Source: https://conflictmappinguganda.crowdmap.com/ For Methodology used in writing this report and for copies of previous reports, please visit www.safeprogram.ug 6 .
Recommended publications
  • Ending CHILD MARRIAGE and TEENAGE PREGNANCY in Uganda
    ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA 1 A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) gratefully acknowledges the valuable contribution of many individuals whose time, expertise and ideas made this research a success. Gratitude is extended to the Research Team Lead by Dr. Florence Kyoheirwe Muhanguzi with support from Prof. Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo and all the Research Assistants for the 10 districts for their valuable support to the research process. Lastly, UNICEF would like to acknowledge the invaluable input of all the study respondents; women, men, girls and boys and the Key Informants at national and sub national level who provided insightful information without whom the study would not have been accomplished. I ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................I
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda 2015 Human Rights Report
    UGANDA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Uganda is a constitutional republic led since 1986 by President Yoweri Museveni of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM) party. Voters re-elected Museveni to a fourth five-year term and returned an NRM majority to the unicameral Parliament in 2011. While the election marked an improvement over previous elections, it was marred by irregularities. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The three most serious human rights problems in the country included: lack of respect for the integrity of the person (unlawful killings, torture, and other abuse of suspects and detainees); restrictions on civil liberties (freedoms of assembly, expression, the media, and association); and violence and discrimination against marginalized groups, such as women (sexual and gender-based violence), children (sexual abuse and ritual killing), persons with disabilities, and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) community. Other human rights problems included harsh prison conditions, arbitrary and politically motivated arrest and detention, lengthy pretrial detention, restrictions on the right to a fair trial, official corruption, societal or mob violence, trafficking in persons, and child labor. Although the government occasionally took steps to punish officials who committed abuses, whether in the security services or elsewhere, impunity was a problem. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life There were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings. On September 8, media reported security forces in Apaa Parish in the north shot and killed five persons during a land dispute over the government’s border demarcation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter4
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2018/19 Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter4 Terms and Conditions I hereby submit Quarter 4 performance progress report. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:550 Rukungiri District for FY 2018/19. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Name and Signature: Accounting Officer, Rukungiri District Date: 31/07/2019 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District) / The Mayor (Municipality) 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2018/19 Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter4 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Ushs Thousands Approved Budget Cumulative Receipts % of Budget Received Locally Raised Revenues 768,329 697,996 91% Discretionary Government Transfers 3,978,084 3,978,013 100% Conditional Government Transfers 29,522,467 29,530,083 100% Other Government Transfers 1,873,561 2,425,114 129% Donor Funding 450,000 268,229 60% Total Revenues shares 36,592,441 36,899,435 101% Overall Expenditure Performance by Workplan Ushs Thousands Approved Cumulative Cumulative % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget Releases Expenditure Released Spent Spent Planning 97,692 94,401 86,491 97% 89% 92% Internal Audit 103,469 108,264 78,275 105% 76% 72% Administration 5,544,298 5,574,561 5,574,108 101% 101% 100% Finance 556,538 553,246 539,337 99% 97% 97% Statutory Bodies 1,184,977 1,132,449 1,114,128 96% 94%
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework (Vmgf)
    VULNERABLE AND MARGINALIZED GROUPS FRAMEWORK (VMGF) FOR THE UGANDA DIGITAL ACCELERATION PROGRAM [UDAP] FPIC with The Tepeth Community in Tapac FPIC with the Batwa Community in Bundibugyo MARCH 2021 Confidential VULNERABLEV ANDULNE MARGINALISEDRABLE AND MA GROUPSRGINALIZ FRAMEWORKED GROUPS (VMGF) January 2021 2 FRAMEWORK Action Parties Designation Signature Prepared Chris OPESEN & Derrick Social Scientist & Environmental KYATEREKERA Specialist Reviewed Flavia OPIO Business Analyst Approved Vivian DDAMBYA Director Technical Services DOCUMENT NUMBER: NITA-U/2021/PLN THE NATIONAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY, UGANDA (NITA-U) Palm Courts; Plot 7A Rotary Avenue (Former Lugogo Bypass). P.O. Box 33151, Kampala- Uganda Tel: +256-417-801041/2, Fax: +256-417-801050 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nita.go.ug The Uganda Digital Acceleration Program [UDAP) Page iii Confidential VULNERABLEV ANDULNE MARGINALISEDRABLE AND MA GROUPSRGINALIZ FRAMEWORKED GROUPS (VMGF) January 2021 2 FRAMEWORK TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS........................................................................................................................................................ vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Background.................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Reform and Sustainable Livelihoods
    ! M4 -vJ / / / o rtr £,/- -n AO ^ l> /4- e^^/of^'i e i & ' cy6; s 6 cy6; S 6 s- ' c fwsrnun Of WVELOPMENT STUDIES LIBRARY Acknowledgements The researchers would like to thank Ireland Aid and APSO for funding the research; the Ministers for Agriculture and Lands, Dr. Kisamba Mugerwa and Hon. Baguma Isoke for their support and contribution; and the Irish Embassy in Kampala for its support. Many thanks also to all who provided valuable insights into the research topic through interviews, focus group discussions and questionnaire surveys in Kampala and Kibaale District. Finally: a special word of thanks to supervisors and research fellows in MISR, particularly Mr Patrick Mulindwa who co-ordinated most of the field-based activities, and to Mr. Nick Chisholm in UCC for advice and direction particularly at design and analysis stages. BLDS (British Library for Development Studies) Institute of Development Studies Brighton BN1 9RE Tel: (01273) 915659 Email: [email protected] Website: www.blds.ids.ac.uk Please return by: Executive Summary Chapter One - Background and Introduction This report is one of the direct outputs of policy orientated research on land tenure / land reform conducted in specific areas of Uganda and South Africa. The main goal of the research is to document information and analysis on key issues relating to the land reform programme in Uganda. It is intended that that the following pages will provide those involved with the land reform process in Kibaale with information on: • how the land reform process is being carried out at a local level • who the various resource users are, how they are involved in the land reform, and how each is likely to benefit / loose • empirical evidence on gainers and losers (if any) from reform in other countries • the gender implications of tenure reform • how conflicts over resource rights are dealt with • essential supports to the reform process (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]
  • Launch of the 8Th Local Government Councils Scorecard Report FY 2018/19
    LAUNCH OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS SCORECARD REPORT FY 2018/2019 Theme The Next Big Steps: Consolidating Gains of Decentralisation and Repositioning the Local Government Sector in Uganda ACODE Policy Dialogue Report Series No.34, 2020 With Support from: Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org Citation: Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment. (2020). Launch of the 8th Local Government Councils Scorecard Report FY 2018/19. Summary Report of the Proceedings, Kampala: ACODE, Policy Dialogue Report Series No.34. © ACODE 2020 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. Reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction. ISBN: 978-9970-567-16-4 LAUNCH OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS SCORECARD REPORT FY 2018/2019 Theme The Next Big Steps: Consolidating Gains of Decentralisation and Repositioning the Local Government Sector in Uganda March 10, 2020 Kampala Uganda ACODE Policy Dialogue Report Series No.34, 2020 The information in this publication does not necessarily reflect the official view of the Democratic Governance Facility, Hewlett Foundation or their partners or any other person acting on their behalf may not be held responsible for the use of the information contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Going To
    % Funding going to Funding Country Name KP‐led Timeline Partner Name Sub‐awardees SNU1 PSNU MER Structural Interventions Allocated Organizations HTS_TST Quarterly stigma & discrimination HTS_TST_NEG meetings; free mental services to HTS_TST_POS KP clients; access to legal services PrEP_CURR for KP PLHIV PrEP_ELIGIBLE Centro de Orientacion e PrEP_NEW Dominican Republic $ 1,000,000.00 88.4% MOSCTHA, Esperanza y Caridad, MODEMU Region 0 Distrito Nacional Investigacion Integral (COIN) PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_NEW TX_PVLS (D) TX_PVLS (N) TX_RTT Gonaives HTS_TST KP sensitization focusing on Artibonite Saint‐Marc HTS_TST_NEG stigma & discrimination, Nord Cap‐Haitien HTS_TST_POS understanding sexual orientation Croix‐des‐Bouquets KP_PREV & gender identity, and building Leogane PrEP_CURR clinical providers' competency to PrEP_CURR_VERIFY serve KP FY19Q4‐ KOURAJ, ACESH, AJCCDS, ANAPFEH, APLCH, CHAAPES, PrEP_ELIGIBLE Haiti $ 1,000,000.00 83.2% FOSREF FY21Q2 HERITAGE, ORAH, UPLCDS PrEP_NEW Ouest PrEP_NEW_VERIFY Port‐au‐Prince PrEP_SCREEN TX_CURR TX_CURR_VERIFY TX_NEW TX_NEW_VERIFY Bomu Hospital Affiliated Sites Mombasa County Mombasa County not specified HTS_TST Kitui County Kitui County HTS_TST_NEG CHS Naishi Machakos County Machakos County HTS_TST_POS Makueni County Makueni County KP_PREV CHS Tegemeza Plus Muranga County Muranga County PrEP_CURR EGPAF Timiza Homa Bay County Homa Bay County PrEP_CURR_VERIFY Embu County Embu County PrEP_ELIGIBLE Kirinyaga County Kirinyaga County HWWK Nairobi Eastern PrEP_NEW Tharaka Nithi County Tharaka Nithi County
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Country Operational Plan 2018 Strategic Direction Summary
    UGANDA Country Operational Plan (COP) 2018 Strategic Direction Summary April 17, 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement .................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context ....................................................................... 5 2.1 Summary Statistics, Disease Burden and Country Profile .......................................................... 5 2.2 Investment Profile ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 National Sustainability Profile Update ..................................................................................... 22 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR Investments Geographically to Disease Burden ................................. 26 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................................................... 28 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization ....................................................................... 31 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-Up Locations and Populations........ 33 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment, and retaining them .................................... 33 4.2 Prevention, specifically detailing programs for priority programming................................... 50 HIV prevention and risk avoidance for AGYW and OVC .......................................................... 50 Key and Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter3
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2020/21 Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter3 Terms and Conditions I hereby submit Quarter 3 performance progress report. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:550 Rukungiri District for FY 2020/21. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Byamungu Elias Date: 30/05/2021 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District) / The Mayor (Municipality) 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2020/21 Vote:550 Rukungiri District Quarter3 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Ushs Thousands Approved Budget Cumulative Receipts % of Budget Received Locally Raised Revenues 776,934 526,056 68% Discretionary Government 4,071,124 3,125,985 77% Transfers Conditional Government Transfers 35,720,413 26,937,516 75% Other Government Transfers 1,392,239 711,115 51% External Financing 980,000 107,525 11% Total Revenues shares 42,940,710 31,408,197 73% Overall Expenditure Performance by Workplan Ushs Thousands Approved Cumulative Cumulative % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget Releases Expenditure Released Spent Spent Administration 7,653,164 5,850,144 5,448,314 76% 71% 93% Finance 556,696 366,741 348,093 66% 63% 95% Statutory Bodies 966,109 634,653 531,580 66% 55% 84% Production and Marketing 1,207,866 1,057,829 957,575 88% 79% 91% Health 6,744,026 4,418,324 3,977,776 66% 59% 90% Education 22,825,527 16,636,070
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape Approach for Reviewing USAID Uganda Activities in the Southwest
    A Landscape Approach For Reviewing USAID Uganda Activities In The Southwest April 2001 Task Order No. 35 Contract No. PCE-I-00-96-00002-00 A Landscape Approach For Reviewing USAID Uganda Activities In The Southwest Prepared by: Rob Clausen, Consultant International Resources Group, Ltd. 1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW H Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202/289-0100 H Fax: 202/289-7601 Prepared for: USAID/Kampala And USAID/Africa Bureau – Office of Sustainable Development April 2001 Environmental Policy and Institutional Strengthening Indefinite Quantity Contract (EPIQ) Partners: International Resources Group, Winrock International, and Harvard Institute for International Development Subcontractors: PADCO; Management Systems International; and Development Alternatives, Inc. Collaborating Institutions: Center for Naval Analysis Corporation; Conservation International; KNB Engineering and Applied Sciences, Inc.; Keller-Bliesner Engineering; Resource Management International, Inc.; Tellus Institute; Urban Institute; and World Resources Institute Table of Contents Table of Contents....................................................................................................................... i Acronyms................................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary................................................................................................................. vi General recommendations are the following ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement, Socioeconomy, Natural Resource Use, and the Attitudes of Communities Surrounding the Park
    MAKERERE INSTITUTE lAND TENURE CENTER Of SOCIAL RESEARCH College of Agricultural Makerere University and Life Sciences Kampala, Uganda University of Wisconsin-Madison BWINDIIMPENETRABLE NATIONAL PARK: SETTLEMENT, SOCIOECONOMY, NATURAL RESOURCE USE, AND THE ATTITUDES OF COMMUNITIES SURROUNDING THE PARK by Mark Marquardt and Magdalene Nyiramahoro Makerere Institute of Social Research and Rob Wild CARE International Development Through Conservation Project ACCESS TO LAND AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES IN UGANDA: RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Research Paper 6 Prepared for Makerere Institute of Social Research and the Land Tenure Center April 1993 Bwindi Impenetrable National Park: Settlement, Socioeconomy, Natural Resource Use, and Attitudes of Communities Surrounding the Park Report of a Rapid Rural Appraisal by Mark Marquardt and Magdalene Nyiramahoro Makerere Institute of Social Research and Rob Wild CARE International Development Through Conservation Project ACCESS TO LAND AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES IN UGANDA: RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Research Paper 6 Prepared for Makerere Institute of Social Research, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda and The Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA April 1993 This report is one of a series of research reports presenting finding of the Access to Land and Other Natural Resources: Research and Policy Development Project. Funding for this research has been provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Kampala, through the Land Tenure Center's Cooperative Agreement with USAID/Washington, and through the World Bank's ASAC programme in Uganda. Ali views, interpretations, recommendations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting or cooperating organizations.
    [Show full text]