DOCSLIB.ORG

Michindoh Sole Source Aquifer Petition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michindoh Sole Source Aquifer Petition SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER PETITION MICHINDOH GLACIAL AQUIFER Prepared and Submitted for: City of Bryan, Ohio October 2007 Phone: (574) 675-4900 Website: TritiumInc.net TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i FIGURES........................................................................................................................................................... iii TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Petitioner Information.................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Narrative .......................................................................................................................................2 2.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.........................................................................................4 2.1 Bedrock Geology...........................................................................................................4 2.1.1 Regional Structures ..........................................................................................................................4 2.1.2 Stratigraphy........................................................................................................................................5 Marshall Formation........................................................................................................................................5 Coldwater Shale (Cuyahoga Shale, Ohio)........................................................................................................6 Undivided Sequence.........................................................................................................................................6 Antrim Shale (Ohio Shale, Ohio)...................................................................................................................6 Traverse Group...............................................................................................................................................6 Dundee Limestone...........................................................................................................................................7 Detroit River Group .......................................................................................................................................7 2.2 Quaternary Geology ......................................................................................................7 2.2.1 Modern Alluvial Sediments.............................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Glacial Sediments .............................................................................................................................8 2.3 Soils ...............................................................................................................................9 3.0 MICHINDOH GLACIAL AQUIFER SYSTEM.................................................. 10 3.1 Physical Description ................................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Aquifer Boundaries ........................................................................................................................10 3.1.2 Hydraulic Characteristics...............................................................................................................11 3.1.3 Groundwater Discharge and Withdrawal...................................................................................13 3.2 Recharge Areas ........................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Recharge Delineation Methods and Results ..............................................................................16 3.2.2 Recharge Source Description .......................................................................................................17 3.3 Vulnerability Assessment............................................................................................ 17 3.4 Streamflow Source Area .............................................................................................. 20 3.4.1 Source Area Delineation ...............................................................................................................20 3.4.2 Gaining/Losing Rivers..................................................................................................................21 3.5 Aquifer Service Area.................................................................................................... 22 3.6 Project Review Area (Designated Area)...................................................................... 23 3.6.1 Physical Extent Boundary.............................................................................................................23 3.6.2 Groundwater Divide Boundaries.................................................................................................23 3.6.3 Economic Boundary......................................................................................................................23 3.6.4 Surface Water Drainage Basins ....................................................................................................24 4.0 SOLE (PRINCIPAL) SOURCE DETERMINATION........................................ 25 4.1 Population ................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.1 Total Population.............................................................................................................................25 4.1.2 Total Population Served................................................................................................................26 4.2 Current Drinking Water Sources................................................................................. 26 4.2.1 Source Matrix..................................................................................................................................27 4.2.2 Source Narratives ...........................................................................................................................28 4.2.3 Explanation of Variations .............................................................................................................29 4.2.4 Current Demand and Potential Withdrawal ..............................................................................29 4.3 Alternative Drinking Water Sources............................................................................ 29 Alternative Source Limitations......................................................................................................................31 SSA_Petition_doc5.doc Tritium, Inc. Page i October 5, 2007 Political Constraints......................................................................................................................................32 5.0 ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY ................................................................................ 33 5.1 Purchased Water ......................................................................................................... 35 5.2 New Wellfield.............................................................................................................. 36 5.3 Surface Water .............................................................................................................. 36 5.3.1 Pump Stations.................................................................................................................................37 5.3.2 Water Treatment Plants.................................................................................................................37 Clearwells .....................................................................................................................................................38 Up-Ground (Off-Channel) Reservoirs ...........................................................................................................39 Stilling Basins...............................................................................................................................................40 5.3.3 Other Project Costs .......................................................................................................................40 5.3.4 Annual Costs...................................................................................................................................40 5.3.5 Alternate Source Selection ............................................................................................................41 5.4 Available Funding....................................................................................................... 43 5.5 Economic Analyses..................................................................................................... 46 5.5.1 Municipal PWSS .............................................................................................................................46 5.5.2 Rural Distribution System.............................................................................................................48 6.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1990 Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan Brendan Ciaran Curran Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Curran, Brendan Ciaran, "Reservoir Geology of the Dundee Limestone, West Branch Field, Michigan" (1990). Master's Theses. 1053. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1053 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN by Brendan Ciaran Curran A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1990 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. RESERVOIR GEOLOGY OF THE DUNDEE LIMESTONE, WEST BRANCH FIELD, MICHIGAN Brendan Ciaran Curran, M.S. W estern Michigan University, 1990 West Branch field is a low-relief, NW-SE-trending anticline near the center of the Michigan basin. Since 1934, the Dundee Limestone (Middle Devonian) has produced over 12 million barrels of oil from this field. From core studies, six depositional facies types were recognized in the Dundee. These are dominated by bioclastic carbonate sand facies deposited in normal- marine shelf settings. Although burial cements have occluded some porosity, carbonate sand facies have retained significant primary interparticle porosity and are the most important reservoir rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit River Group in the Michigan Basin
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 133 September 1951 DETROIT RIVER GROUP IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN By Kenneth K. Landes UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Washington, D. C. Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................ ^ Amherstburg formation................. 7 Nomenclature of the Detroit River Structural geology...................... 14 group................................ i Geologic history ....................... ^4 Detroit River group..................... 3 Economic geology...................... 19 Lucas formation....................... 3 Reference cited........................ 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Location of wells and cross sections used in the study .......................... ii 2. Correlation chart . ..................................... 2 3. Cross sections A-«kf to 3-G1 inclusive . ......................;.............. 4 4. Facies map of basal part of Dundee formation. ................................. 5 5. Aggregate thickness of salt beds in the Lucas formation. ........................ 8 6. Thickness map of Lucas formation. ........................................... 10 7. Thickness map of Amherstburg formation (including Sylvania sandstone member. 11 8. Lime stone/dolomite facies map of Amherstburg formation ...................... 13 9. Thickness of Sylvania sandstone member of Amherstburg formation.............. 15 10. Boundary of the Bois Blanc formation in southwestern Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin–Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana
    In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin–Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin—Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana By Donna N. Myers and Kevin D. Metzker, U.S. Geological Survey, and Steven Davis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4091 In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of the Interior BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S.Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 2000 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve
    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Collingwood Mb., Lindsay Fm., Stratigraphy and Oil Shale Potential
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • 021-1570 Fnl Rpt 4 Feb 03 LLW Geotech Feas Study.Doc
    Golder Associates Ltd. 2390 Argentia Road Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 5Z7 Telephone: (905) 567-4444 Fax: (905) 567-6561 REPORT ON LLW GEOTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY WESTERN WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY BRUCE SITE TIVERTON, ONTARIO Submitted to: Municipality of Kincardine and Ontario Power Generation Nuclear Waste Management Division 700 University Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X6 DISTRIBUTION: 4 Copies - Municipality of Kincardine 4 Copies - Ontario Power Generation 2 Copies - Golder Associates Ltd. January 2003 021-1570 OFFICES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, EUROPE, AFRICA, ASIA AND AUSTRALIA January 2003 -i- 021-1570 SUMMARY This report presents the results of an assessment of the geotechnical feasibility of constructing a LLW permanent repository at OPG’s Western Waste Management Facility at the former Bruce Nuclear Power Development site near Tiverton, Ontario (the Bruce Site). The assessment was undertaken as part of activities associated with a Memorandum of Understanding between OPG and the Municipality of Kincardine and considered a number of generic LLW repository concepts previously developed by OPG, specifically: • three near surface concepts involving emplacement of LLW in structural concrete vaults located on ground surface (Covered Above Grade Concrete Vault), in a shallow trench at a depth of about 10 m to 15 m below ground surface (Shallow Concrete Vault) and in a deep trench at a depth of about 25 m below ground surface (Deep Concrete Vault); and • four Rock Cavern Vault concepts involving emplacement of LLW in unlined, mined caverns in the bedrock at a depth of about 50 m to 100 m below ground surface (Shallow Rock Cavern Vault) and at depths of about 200 m to 800 m below ground surface (Deep Rock Cavern Vault) in (i) a thick salt bed, (ii) a low permeability shale sequence, and (iii) a low permeability limestone sequence which were projected to underlie the Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Amendment
    Natural Resource Amendment to the Fulton County Comprehensive Development Plan Of 1998 Prepared By Fulton County Regional Planning Commission Steven Brown, Director Leitha Sackmann, Planner & GIS Director Seth Brehm, Planner Adopted April 27, 2004 Revision Adopted June 28, 2011 by the Fulton County Regional Planning Commission Adopted June 28, 2004 Revision Adopted August 4, 2011 by the Fulton County Commissioners TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Maps ............................................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................................v Task Force Members ................................................................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Update .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Grand River Watershed an Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River Watershed
    Geology of the Grand River Watershed An Overview of Bedrock and Quaternary Geological Interpretations in the Grand River watershed Prepared by Bob Janzen, GIT December 2018 i Table of Contents List of Maps ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................. 1 Algonquin Arch ......................................................................................................... 2 Bedrock Cuestas ...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Bedrock Surface ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Bedrock Formations of the Grand River watershed ........................................... 8 2.2.1 Queenston Formation ................................................................................ 15 2.2.2 Clinton–Cataract Group ............................................................................. 15 2.2.2.1 Whirlpool Formation ............................................................................ 16 2.2.2.2 Manitoulin Formation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Tiffin River and Select Tributaries, 2012-2014
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Tiffin River and Select Tributaries, 2012-2014. Defiance, Fulton, Williams, and Henry Counties Division of Surface Water December 15th, 2015 DSW/EAS 2015-06-04 Tiffin River Watershed 2012-14 December 15th, 2015 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Tiffin River and Select Tributaries, 2012-2014 Defiance, Fulton, Williams, and Henry Counties Technical Report Number DSW/EAS 2015-06-04 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Northwest District Office 347 N. Dunbridge Road Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 John R. Kasich, Governor Craig W. Butler, Director State of Ohio Ohio Environmental Protection Agency DSW/EAS 2015-06-04 Tiffin River Watershed 2012-14 December 15th, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. v List of Appendices (Separate Companion Document) ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Lake Erie Basin Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring
    Western Lake Erie Basin Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring OKI monitoring and findings Donna Runkle and Ed Dobrowolski April 23, 2019 Problem Large inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus can cause algal blooms and can cause taste and odor problems and introduce cyanotoxins into water supplies. Objective Measure streamflow and collect water- quality samples to quantify daily, seasonal, and annual nutrient and sediment loads from tributaries of the Maumee River that flow into Lake Erie. 2 Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring Sites in the Western Lake Erie Basin Map label Station ID Station Name 1 04185935 Auglaize River near Kossuth, OH 2 04186500 Auglaize River near Fort Jennings , OH 3 04188100 Ottawa River near Kalida, OH 4 04190000 Blanchard River near Dupont, OH 5 04191058 Little Auglaize River near Melrose, OH 6 41914444 Little Flatrock Creek near Junction, OH 7 04191500 Auglaize River near Defiance, OH 8 04192500 Maumee River near Defiance, OH 9 04185318 Tiffin River near Evansport, OH 10 04183979 Platter Creek near Sherwood, OH 11 04178000 St Joseph River near Newville, IN 12 04183500 Maumee River at Antwerp, OH---Supergage 13 04183105 Maumee River at SR 101 near Woodburn, IN 14 04183000 Maumee River at New Haven, IN 15 04182000 St Marys River near Fort Wayne, IN 16 04181049 St Marys River at Walcot Street at Willshire, OH 3 Project Partners 4 Water-Quality Parameters Analyzed for Projects Parameter Parameter name/description code (National Water Quality Lab (NWQL) Schedule2425 Total Dissolved Nutrients 00671 (DRP, dissolved reactive
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigation 15 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY of BARRY COUNTY, MICHIGAN
    Geological Survey Ordovician System .......................................................10 Report of Investigation 15 Cincinnatian Series...................................................10 Trenton Group ..........................................................10 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF BARRY COUNTY, Black River Group ....................................................10 MICHIGAN St. Peter Sandstone .................................................11 by Prairie du Chien Group.............................................11 Richard T. Lilienthal Cambrian System.........................................................11 Illustrations by Author Trempealeau Formation ...........................................11 Lansing Munising Formation ..................................................12 1974 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY .............................................12 POROUS INTERVALS....................................................12 Contents REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING ...................16 FOREWORD......................................................................2 ABSTRACT .......................................................................2 Illustrations INTRODUCTION ...............................................................3 GEOLOGIC SETTING.......................................................3 Figures MINERAL RESOURCES...................................................3 Index map ...................................................................................2 Surface Minerals ............................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Your Use of This Ontario Geological Survey Document (The “Content”) Is Governed by the Terms Set out on This Page (“Terms of Use”)
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]