DOCSLIB.ORG

The End of World War II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The End of World War II Name _____________________________ Class________________________ Date_____________ World War II Lesson 7 The End of World War II Key Terms and People United Nations (UN) World peacekeeping organization created after World War II V-E Day Victory in Europe Day, May 8, 1945 Harry S. Truman 33rd president of the United States J. Robert Oppenheimer Scientist who led the Manhattan Project Hiroshima City that was the site of the first atomic-bomb drop in Japan Nagasaki Japanese city that was the site of the second atomic-bomb drop Nuremberg Trials Tribunal that tried Nazi leaders for war crimes Gl Bill of Rights Law passed by Congress to help servicemen readjust to civilian life Before You Read In the last lesson you learned how the United States defeated the Japanese in the Pacific. In this lesson you will learn about preparations for the postwar world, the use of the atomic bomb, challenges countries faced, and benefits of the war for Americans. As You Read Use a chart to take notes on major World War II events at the end and after the war. THE ALLIES LIBERATE EUROPE Germany from the east and Allied forces How did the Allies try to shape the came from the west. The Germans were postwar world? surrounded. The Battle of the Bulge left Germany Meanwhile, in February 1945 in a weakened state. Allied troops Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin, the Big marched eastward into the center of Three, met at the Yalta Conference. Germany. They were pleased over the defeat of Meanwhile, the Soviets pushed Germany, which now seemed certain. westward across Poland toward Berlin, Stalin wanted to keep Germany divided Germany. The Soviets were the first to into occupation zones, areas controlled liberate death camps and to describe the by Allied military forces, so Germany unbelievable horrors they saw there. could no longer be a threat. Churchill Americans, who later liberated Nazi disagreed and Roosevelt suggested death camps in Germany, were just as concessions to Stalin. He wanted Stalin horrified as the Soviets had been. to help in the fight to defeat Japan. And The Soviet army approached he wanted Stalin to support the United © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company 195 Guided Reading Workbook Name _____________________________ Class________________________ Date_____________ Lesson 7, continued Nations (UN), a new world peacekeeping 1945, the first atomic bomb was tested. organization. It was even more powerful than At Yalta, the Allies agreed to divide predicted. Many scientists felt it would Germany into four zones: one zone for be immoral to drop the bomb on Japan. the Americans, the British, the Soviets, Others said it would shorten the war and the French. Stalin agreed to allow and save lives. It would also give the free elections in Poland and other United States an advantage over the Eastern European countries. He also Soviets after the war. Truman decided to agreed to join in the war against Japan. use the bomb. The Yalta Conference made many On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb decisions, but it signaled growing was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. friction between the Soviet Union and Almost every building collapsed into the other Allies. dust. But Japan did not surrender. A By April 25, 1945, the Soviets were in second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Berlin. Hitler responded to certain killing 200,000. Emperor Hirohito was defeat by shooting himself. horrified. Japan surrendered on A week later, General Eisenhower September 2, 1945. The war was over. accepted the unconditional surrender of 2. Why did Truman decide to use the Nazi Germany. On May 8, 1945, the atomic bomb? Allies proclaimed V-E Day—Victory in Europe Day. President Roosevelt never saw V-E Day because he died on April 12, 1945. Vice-President Harry S. Truman became the nation’s 33rd president. THE CHALLENGES OF VICTORY 1. How did the Yalta Conference shape How did losing the war affect the the postwar world? leaders of Germany and Japan? Japan had surrendered, but the use of the atomic bomb had brought the world into the nuclear age. Over time, the Soviet Union and other nations tried to build their own atomic weapons. But the THE ATOMIC BOMB task at hand was what to do for the ENDS THE WAR postwar world. Why did the United States use At the Yalta Conference and even the atomic bomb? before, leaders were planning for the Although the Allies had won Iwo United Nations. People hoped that the Jima and Okinawa, they knew invading United Nations would help bring a time Japan would be difficult because it still of peace. Instead, the UN became a had a huge army. President Truman place where the two superpowers, the believed that the only way to avoid an United States and the Soviet Union, invasion was to use the weapon competed and tried to influence other developed by scientists working on the nations. Manhattan Project, the atomic bomb. Even before the war ended, there were J. Robert Oppenheimer had led the tensions between the United States and research and development. On July 16, the Soviet Union. Truman met with the © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company 196 Guided Reading Workbook Name _____________________________ Class________________________ Date_____________ Lesson 7, continued Allied leaders at the Potsdam CHANGES ON THE HOME FRONT Conference in July 1945. At Yalta, How did American society change as Stalin had promised to allow free a result of the war? elections in Eastern Europe. But now Although Europe and Japan suffered Soviet troops occupied Eastern Europe, tremendous devastation, World War II and Stalin was not going to allow free brought Americans opportunities. There elections. were jobs and money to spend. In addition to democratic countries, Unemployment fell, and workers were Truman and Stalin disagreed about the able to save money. reparations from Germany to help repay Farmers also benefited. After the dust Soviet wartime losses. However, the storms of the depression years, the leaders at Potsdam were able to 1940s saw good weather for growing compromise. They divided Germany crops. Improvements in farm technology into four occupation zones as was set up also helped farmers make a profit. at the Yalta Conference. Each occupying The war had been good to women, country was able to take reparations too. More than 6 million women had from its own zone. started working. Many of these jobs The Nuremberg Trials were held to try were doing work traditionally done by remaining Nazi leaders. For the first men. time, a nation’s leaders were held legally The war also brought about one of responsible for their wartime acts. They the largest mass migrations the country were tried for crimes against humanity, ever experienced. People who had lived crimes against the peace, and war for years in a place decided to look for crimes. The result of the trials was that jobs elsewhere. People left farms and 12 of the 24 defendants were sentenced small towns. They moved to the North to death and most of the others were and the West. African Americans were sent to prison. Later trials saw 200 more among these migrants. They were found guilty of war crimes. These trials looking for new jobs and to escape established the idea that individuals are discrimination. responsible for their own actions even In 1944 Congress passed the GI Bill during a war. This principle became part of Rights, which was designed to help of international law. servicemen readjust to civilian life. This After its surrender, Japan was bill paid for veterans to get an occupied by American forces headed by education. Over half the returning General MacArthur. This occupation soldiers took advantage of this lasted for six years. First, Japanese opportunity. It also gave federal loan officials were put on trial for war crimes. guarantees to veterans buying homes or Then, the United States helped Japan set farms or starting businesses. The GI Bill up a free-market economic system and gave many people opportunities they create a new democratic constitution. otherwise would never have had. 3. How were defeated nations treated 4. How did the war benefit Americans? by the Allies? © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company 197 Guided Reading Workbook Name _____________________________ Class________________________ Date_____________ Lesson 7, continued Complete the chart about the end of World War II, postwar plans, the challenges of victory, and life on the home front. WORLD War II’s End AND BEYOND 1. How did the Soviets and Americans react to the Nazi death camps? 2. What plans did Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin make at the Yalta Conference? 3. Why was V-E Day important? 4. Why did some scientists believe that it was immoral to drop the atomic bomb on Japan? 5. What major difference between the United States and the Soviet Union was demonstrated at the Potsdam Conference? 6. What made the Nuremberg Trials so significant? 7. What were positive results that came out of the U.S. occupation of Japan? 8. Why did the war bring about one of the largest mass migrations in the United States? 9. Why was the GI Bill of Rights a necessary law? © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company 198 Guided Reading Workbook.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Meaning of Victory
    THE MEANING OF VICTORY Beatrice Heuser Strategic Studies University of Reading (currently Paris) “Victories“? • Gulf War I • Afghanistan • Gulf War II • (and the many defeats in the Cold War) Debate about victory • General Petraeus: “This is not the sort of struggle where you take a hill, plant the flag and go home with a victory parade … It’s not war with a simple slogan. (11 Sept. 2008) • Robert Mandel • William Martel • Colin Gray • Angstrom & Duyvesteyn • Boone Bartholomees • Pres. Obama: “Let’s not talk about victory” (June 2011) The Age of the Napoleonic- Clausewitzian Paradigm • 19th century until 1945 (or even later, especially US armed forces – Col Harry Summers) • Obsession with victory for its own sake • Defined as: “imposing one’s will upon the enemy” (Clausewitz), negation of any give- and-take. • And… Pursuit of Victory at all cost • Brian Bond: The Pursuit of Victory from Napoleon to Saddam Hussein • American Civil War: unconditional surrender. • Franco-Prussian War: Peace “Diktat”, unaffordable Reparations, extensive humiliation of defeated party. Perceived injustice. • World War I: Versailles “Diktat”, unaffordable Reparations, extensive humiliation of defeated party. Perceived injustice. • World War II: unconditional surrender. By contrast: earlier thinkers… ARISTOTLE • The end of the medical art is health, that of shipbuilding a vessel, that of strategy victory, that of economics wealth. (Nicomachean Ethics I.1) • We are busy that we may have leisure, and make war that we may live in peace. … no-one chooses to be at war, or provokes war, for the sake of being at war. (Nicomachean Ethics X.7) Just War • Goes back to pre-Christian ROMAN concepts • Preconditions for Just War: – Just cause (self-defence or defence of another) – Just aim: the pursuit of peace – Was is the last resort – Carried out with moderation (proportionality), – And balance of consequences, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Sunrise: America’S OSS, Swiss Intelligence, and the German Surrender 1945
    Operation Sunrise: America’s OSS, Swiss Intelligence, and the German Surrender 1945 by Stephen P. Halbrook* Operation Sunrise was a cooperative effort of American and Swiss intelligence services which led to the unconditional surrender of the German Wehrmacht forces in Northern Italy and Western Austria on May 2, 1945. General Heinrich von Vietinghoff, Commander-in- Chief of the Southwest Command and of Army Group C, surrendered nearly a million soldiers, the strongest remaining German force. This was the first great surrender of German forces to the Allies, and became a strong impetus for the final Allied victory over Nazi Germany on May 8, Victory in Europe (VE) Day. Operation Sunrise helped to nip in the bud Nazi aspirations for guerilla resistance in an Alpine redoubt. Sunrise, sometimes referred to as “Crossword,” has special significance today beyond the sixtieth anniversary of the German surrender. Despite Switzerland’s formal neutrality, Swiss intelligence agents aggressively facilitated American efforts to end the war. Ironically, the efforts of key U.S. intelligence agents on the ground to orchestrate the surrender were hampered and almost scuttled by leaders in Washington to appease Joseph Stalin, who wished to delay the surrender in the West so that Soviet forces could grab more territory in the East. *This paper was originally presented at the conference Sunrise ‘05, Locarno, Switzerland, May 2, 2005, and was published in “Operation Sunrise.” Atti del convegno internazionale (Locarno, 2 maggio 2005), a cura di Marino Viganò - Dominic M. Pedrazzini (Lugano 2006), pp. 103-30. The conference was held to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the surrender of German forces in northern Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends Mark Mutual Victory NATO Troops March in Red Square During V-E Day Parade
    Friends Mark Mutual Victory NATO troops march in Red Square during V-E Day parade E May 9, 2010, marked the 65th anniversa- SS ry of the end of World War II in Europe CE-PRE as Nazism was finally defeated. To com- AN R F memorate the end of the war, a Victory CE N Day has been celebrated annually since GE A 1945. However, the 2010 edition of the Victory Day parade was not the parade local residents are accustomed to see- ing in Moscow’s Red Square. Nearly 1,000 troops from four NATO countries – France, Great Britain, Poland and the United States – took part in the ceremony to mark the end of the combined effort to end Nazi aggres- sion, marking the first time that countries of the Second World War’s alliance gathered to mark the auspicious occasion. According to an April 2010 poll by Russia’s independent Levada Center, 55% of respondents held a “wholly or partly positive view” about participation by NATO troops in the Victory Day parade, according to a Reuters article on the subject. In Russia, World War II is known as “The Great Patriotic War” – a phrase that carries great rever- ence and resonance. The phrase is one of only a handful capitalized in Russian, and it serves as a solemn reminder of the defeat of the Nazi assault on the Eastern Front. The descendants of those who repelled the Nazi assault continue to be united by the efforts of their elders. As part of the ceremonies, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev encouraged the parade’s spectators to show soli- darity, while noting the fragility of peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Victory in Europe
    Published on NCpedia (https://www.ncpedia.org) Home > ANCHOR > The Great Depression and World War II (1929 and 1945) > Victory — and After > Victory in Europe Victory in Europe [1] Share it now! Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) radio broadcast [2], May 4, 1945, in which Edward R. Murrow announces the surrender of German troops to Field Marshal Sir Bernard Montgomery. The report also includes a fragment of Montgomery’s remarks following the surrender. After their victory in the Battle of the Bulge, American, British, and French forces pressed eastward into Germany, while Soviet troops invaded from the east. In April, his armies and government collapsing, Hitler committed suicide. His generals, recognizing that they had no hope left of victory, surrendered on May 7. In the west, the German surrender became effective on May 8. In the east, a separate surrender signed with Soviet forces became effective on the 9th. [3] The instrument of surrender, signed May 7, 1945. For Europeans, the war ended on "V-E Day" -- Victory in Europe Day, May 8, 1945 (or May 9 in the Soviet Union). Sixty years later, the U.S. State Department invited Europeans to share their memories of V-E Day. A woman from the island of Malta in the Mediterranean recounted her mother's story: At the time my mother was 10 years old. She remembers the bells started to ring and everyone went out into the streets because the bells hadn't been rung for the whole duration of the war. Then the word went round that the war was over and her mother started to cry and hug her and her five brothers, squeezing them all so hard that it hurt.
    [Show full text]
  • 83Rd Infantry Division Thunderbolt. Vol 1 No 3. May 12, 1945
    WThunderbolt| NORMANDY. BRITTANY. LOIRE VALLEY. LUXEMBOURG. HURTGEN FOREST. ARDENNES. FIRST TO RHINE. ELBE BRIDGEHEAD! | V0L1, No. 3 SOMEWHERE IN GERMANY MAY 12,1945 United Nations Celebrate V-E Day As Germany Signs Unconditional Surrender Allied World Rejoices At End of Bitter Six Year Struggle; Complete Capitulation Signed Monday At General Eisenhowers Hqrs. At Rheims Victory in Europe Day was celebrated on Tuesday of this week following a joint proclamation by President Truman, Prime Minister Churchill and Marshal Stalin that Germany had signed unconditional surrender terms and hostilities would officially cease at one minute after midnight Tuesday. In all Allied capitals the news was received with wild enthusiasm and crowds surged into the streets shouting and whistling in celebration of the victory. In Washington, President Truman in gium and bis family have been liberated to cease hostilities,*' he concluded. an address to the nation said that the and are in Allied hands. Despite the claim of the German radio surrender terms \ver< signed officially On Wednesday the surrender prior to the capitualion that Hitler was at 0241 hours Monday in Rheims, agreement was ratified in Berlin in the personally conducting the defense of France where General Eisenhower has presence of Marshal Zuhkov, Air Berlin, Russian correspondents have re• set up his headquarters. The president Marshal Tedder and General Spaatz for ported that no trace of the leading war further asserted that "our victory is on• the Allies and General Keitel for the criminal was found after the fall of the ly half won and not until the final Germans. Correspondents who went to city.
    [Show full text]
  • General Grant National Memorial
    both as a citizen and soldier. Allegorical figures by J. CAPTAIN SAM GRANT: The future commanding gen­ At Shiloh in April, when a Confederate surprise Massey Rhind representing Grant's youth, military service, eral of the Union armies and President of the United States attack threatened to overwhelm the Federal army, Grant civilian life, and death are between the arches of the ro­ was born in Point Pleasant, Ohio, on April 27, 1822. regrouped his shaken forces and drove the Southerners tunda. Bronze busts sculpted by Mues and J. Juszko of sev­ Baptized Hiram Ulysses Grant, he found when he en­ from the field. The narrowly won victory was a giant eral of Grant's comrades-in-arms are in niches in the walls tered West Point in 1839 that his name appeared on the step forward in the North's conquest of the Mississippi of the crypt. In 1966 three mosaics, designed by Allyn Cox, records as Ulysses Simpson Grant. The record was al­ Valley. representing the battles of Vicksburg and Chattanooga and lowed to stand. To the other cadets his initials suggested Maintaining the initiative in the West, Grant the surrender at Appomattox, each a significant event in the nickname "Uncle Sam," quickly shortened to "Sam." achieved a major goal of Union war strategy on July 4, Grant's career, were placed in the lunettes of the rotunda. At West Point he distinguished himself in horsemanship 1863, when his capture of the Mississippi fortress of Vicks­ THE NATIONAL MEMORIAL: From the time of its and showed ability in mathematics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuremberg Trials and Crimes Against Humanity
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2014 Apr 29th, 10:30 AM - 11:45 AM The Nuremberg Trials and Crimes Against Humanity Katie A. Welgan St. Mary's Academy Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the European History Commons, and the Legal Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Welgan, Katie A., "The Nuremberg Trials and Crimes Against Humanity" (2014). Young Historians Conference. 8. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2014/oralpres/8 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! The Nuremberg Trials and !Crimes Against Humanity ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Katie Welgan Portland State University Challenge: Modern European History December 15, 2013 !2 While Germany’s unconditional surrender to Allied forces on May 9th, 1945 marked the conclusion of physical conflict on Western Front, this transfer of power at the end of World War II created a new conflict of an administrative nature. As victors, American, British, French, and Soviet officials were responsible for the development of a system to address the crimes of Nazi leaders. While international law—and popular opinion in several Allied countries—favored executions without trials, prominent leaders including Joseph Stalin
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Information Environment Through the Lens
    GEORGIA’S INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF RUSSIA’S INFLUENCE PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE 1 Georgia’s Information Environment through the Lens of Russia’s Influence Project Director: Elīna Lange-Ionatamišvili Project Manager: James McMillan Content Editors: Elīna Lange-Ionatamišvili, James McMillan Language Editors: Tomass Pildagovičs, James McMillan Authors: Nino Bolkvadze, Ketevan Chachava, Gogita Ghvedashvili, Elīna Lange-Ionat- amišvili, James McMillan, Nana Kalandarishvili, Anna Keshelashvili, Natia Kuprashvili, Tornike Sharashenidze, Tinatin Tsomaia Design layout: Tornike Lordkipanidze We would like to thank our anonymous peer reviewers from King’s College London for their generous contribution. ISBN: 978-9934-564-36-9 This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 1: GEORGIA’S STRATEGIC INTERESTS ................................................6 By Tornike Sharashenidze CHAPTER 2: RUSSIA’S STRATEGIC INTERESTS IN GEORGIA .......................... 18 By Nana Kalandarishvili
    [Show full text]
  • Was World War II a Just War?
    Chapter Ten vJ farbD \Yv -11 Figure 10-1 When Canadian Forces chased German troops out of Deventer, Netherlands, as the end of World War II approached, city residents turned out to celebrate their freedom. Rifleman Robert MacGregor Douglas (top), who was photographed surrounded by happy schoolgirls, was one of the Canadians involved in the action. The Canadian Forces fought a long, brutal campaign to liberate the Netherlands. As a result, the Dutch forged a lasting relationship with Canada, and people in the Netherlands continue to honour the soldiers who freed their country. On May 8, 2005, the 60th anniversary of VE Day — Victory in Europe Day — citizens of Apeldoorn, Netherlands, cheered the Canadian veterans (bottom) who had returned to help commemorate the occasion. ZEZ UNIT 3 • Did Canada grow up during World War IP • fZYTICL-721% NZ-AM How did Canada make its mark in World War II? The liberation of the Netherlands by Canadian Forces in 1945 was a significant contribution to the international effort to end World War II. Key Terms But this campaign was only one of many difficult challenges faced by blitzkrieg Canadian Forces during the war. Names such as Dieppe, Hong Kong, Resistance Ortona, and Normandy have also become important symbols of the collaborators war and are vividly remembered by those who fought there — and by U-boat those who honour the sacrifices made by Canadian Forces. atomic bomb Rifleman Robert MacGregor Douglas, pictured on the previous Geneva Convention'. page, survived the war. Douglas may look carefree in the photograph, Holocaust but he and his fellow Canadians had not yet finished the job.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Intention and a Just and Lasting Peace
    1 Right Intention and a Just and Lasting Peace Historically, the norm of right intention has been a constitutive part of the ad bellum phase of just war theory, and “aims to overcome the pos- sibility that a state may have a just cause, but still act from a wrong intention.”1 Wrong intentions aim or intend acts or effects (e.g., punishing the state one is at war with, using the resources of that state, causing more destruction than is needed, or pursuing a war longer than is neces- sary) that are not warranted by and do not serve to vindicate a state’s just cause. “Having the right reason for launching a war is not enough: the actual motivation behind the resort to war must also be morally appropriate; the only right intention allowed is to see the just cause for resorting to war secured and consolidated”2 Without the condition of right intention, “the connection between one’s action and the reason that justifies it remains contingent, and this allows for the possibility that just cause could be only a pretext or excuse for bellicose action aimed at some further goal beyond that which one’s justifying reason supports, or at some completely independent goal that can be pursued using the justifying reasons as a rationalization only.”3 Having a just cause does not necessarily entail that the state’s leaders and citizens will not have ulterior motives. However, as Joseph Boyle posits, “This does not mean that one cannot engage in war in anticipation of benefits that go beyond one’s justified war aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending the Pacific War: the New History
    CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE Ending the Pacific War: The New History RICHARD B. FRANK In 1945, and for approximately two decades thereafter, no significant American controversy attended the use of atomic weapons to end the Pacific War. A national consensus assembled around three basic premises: (a) the use of the weapons was justified; (b) the weapons ended the war; and (c) that in at least a rough utilitarian sense, employment of the weapons was morally justified as saving more lives than they cost (Walker 1990 , 2005 ; Bernstein 1995 ). The historian Michael Sherry branded this as “The Patriotic Orthodoxy” (Sherry 1996 ). Beginning in the mid-1960s challenges appeared to “The Patriotic Orthodoxy.” The pejorative label “revisionists” was sometimes pelted at these challengers, but a more accurate term is just critics. The critics developed a canon of tenets that, in their purest incarnation, likewise formed a trio: (a) Japan’ s strategic situation in the summer of 1945 was catastrophically hopeless; (b) Japan ’ s leaders recognized their hopeless situation and were seeking to surrender; and (c) American leaders, thanks to the breaking of Japanese diplomatic codes, knew Japan hovered on the verge of surrender when they unleashed needless nuclear devastation. The critics mustered a number of reasons for the unwarranted use of atomic weapons, but the most provocative by far marches under the banner “atomic diplomacy”: the real target of the weapons was not Japan, but the Soviet Union (Walker 1990 , 2005 ; Bernstein 1995 ). These two rival narratives clashed along a cultural fault line most spectacularly in the “Enola Gay” controversy in 1995 over the proposed text of a Smithsonian Institution exhibit of the fuselage of the plane that dropped the first atomic bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Vs. Total War Brian W Brennan Armor; Sep/Oct 2002; 111, 5; Proquest Direct Complete Pg
    Limited vs. total war Brian W Brennan Armor; Sep/Oct 2002; 111, 5; ProQuest Direct Complete pg. 8 Limited vs. Total War by Captain Brian W. Brennan retain its dominant role in world af­ tie and to break his will to continue the fairs, it will have to look back at past conflict. total war strategies and incorporate Limited war is entirely different. At them into future operations. Since 1776, the U.S. Government and, the dawn of the Cold War, when the more specifically, the U.S. Army have Soviet Union entered the nuclear age, The concept of total war is fairly sim­ struggled with how best to fight our na­ the Truman and Johnson administra­ ple. Total war is best defined by the old tion's wars. tions were concerned that a war of any Soviet definition for a "Total 'Naya kind would risk global nuclear annihi­ Though the terms "total war" and Voyna," or "foreign or total war," lation, so a limited warfare policy was "limited war" are relatively new and which states that a total war is "an all­ developed. were developed to describe the United embracing imperialist war, waged by States' efforts to minimize civilian ca­ all manner of means, not only against The policy's goal was "to exact good sualties, prevent global nuclear annihi­ enemy armed forces, but against the behavior or to oblige discontinuance of lation, and engage the enemy only in entire population of a nation, with a mischief, not to destroy the subject specific, politically driven battlefields, view to its complete destruction."2 It is altogether."3 This type of warfare, how­ their concepts have been debated for in this kind of war that almost every ever, was not at all in accordance with centuries.
    [Show full text]