DOCSLIB.ORG

ACRP Project 03-43 Integrating Airport Ground Access and Metropolitan Surface Transportation Planning Efforts Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACRP Project 03-43 Integrating Airport Ground Access and Metropolitan Surface Transportation Planning Efforts Final Report ACRP Project 03-43 Integrating Airport Ground Access and Metropolitan Surface Transportation Planning Efforts Final Report Michael D. Meyer Atlanta, GA and Simon M. Mosbah Louis D. Wolinetz Washington DC WSP USA, Inc. Prepared for Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine Privileged Document This document, not released for publication, is furnished only for review to members or participants in CRP. This document is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by CRP. WSP USA Inc. July 2019 1 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Project Purpose ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Research Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Review of the Literature and of Relevant Existing Procedures, Protocols, Rules, Laws, Tools and Regulations ................................................................................................................................................... 7 General Literature on Airport Ground Access (all modes and types) ........................................................ 8 Airport Planning ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Rules/Regulations/Laws ........................................................................................................................... 11 Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Airports ............................................................................... 14 Collaboration Strategies ........................................................................................................................... 16 Survey of Key Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 17 Airport-Transportation Planning Agency Collaboration Case Studies ..................................................... 21 Tools and Methods for Collaboration ......................................................................................................... 27 Guidebook for Assessing Collaborative Planning Efforts Among Airport and Public Planning Agencies ... 30 Education and Outreach Plan ..................................................................................................................... 33 Target Audiences ................................................................................................................................ 34 Relevant Organizations for Targeted Audiences ................................................................................ 35 Proposed Content and Outline of Materials ....................................................................................... 36 Dissemination Methods ...................................................................................................................... 37 Performance Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 41 Budget and Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 41 References .................................................................................................................................................. 43 Appendix A: Survey Instruments for Airport and Planning Agency Staffs ................................................ A-1 A1: Airport Survey .................................................................................................................................. A-1 A2: MPO Survey ...................................................................................................................................... A-4 Appendix B: Case Studies ........................................................................................................................... B-1 B.1 Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport Case Study .................................................................................. B-2 B.2 Baltimore Washington International Airport Case Study ............................................................... B-19 B.3 Indianapolis International Airport Case Study ................................................................................ B-32 B.4 Los Angeles International Airport Case Study ................................................................................. B-44 B.5 Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport Case Study ................................................................. B-60 2 B.6 San Diego International Airport Case Study ................................................................................... B-78 Figures Figure 1: Research Approach ........................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 2: Literature Related to Airport and Surface Transportation Planning Agency Collaboration .......... 7 Figure 3: Location of Survey Respondents .................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4: Proposed Schedule for Outreach Effort ....................................................................................... 42 Tables Table 1: Surveys Completed by Both Airport and MPO Representatives ................................................... 18 Table 2: Efficacy and Cost of Different Dissemination Strategies ............................................................... 41 Table 3: Estimated Budget for Outreach Effort .......................................................................................... 42 3 Introduction Efficient ground access is key to the operation of airports. Primarily through the master planning process, airports devote considerable resources to identifying the needs of airport users for facilities such as access to the terminal curb, parking, and rental car facilities. At the same time, surface planning agencies study and implement solutions to improve access to the airport and themselves develop transportation plans that include the airport as a major origin and destination of many regional trips. However, collaboration and coordination between airports and surface transportation planning agencies often is lacking, with each entity focusing on its side of the airport property line. Given the importance of airport ground access, this lack of coordination could have important consequences for the success and cost of ground access projects. In addition, it could affect the sustainable growth and operations of airports, which heavily depend on efficient and effective access. There are many opportunities in the planning processes of both airports and planning agencies for collaboration to occur. For planning organizations, such opportunities could occur in the planning for the metropolitan long-range transportation plan (the responsibility of the metropolitan planning organization (MPO); comprehensive plans (the responsibility of local jurisdictions) that include land use and transportation components; corridor-level plans focusing on major transportation corridors that are experiencing safety and/or congestions problems; regional transit plans (usually the responsibility of the transit agency although in some cases developed by the MPO); site-specific, development-oriented planning that focuses on traffic impacts; and environmental planning that includes noise pollution, air pollutant emissions and a myriad other environmental concerns. For airports, opportunities for collaboration could include airport master plan updates; other planning studies (e.g., terminal-specific plans, airfield plans); airport layout plans (drawings that include off airport property sites) required by law for airports that receive federal funding; and environmental assessment studies for major changes in airport access. With many air traveler expectations increasingly including high quality airport access via different transportation modes, there is a need to understand how the different planning organizations can work collaboratively in providing the most effective airport access strategies. Evolving transportation technology, such as autonomous vehicles, , might be another factor that influences the future of transportation and that could lead to a rethinking of airport access strategies. With respect to transit, not only will improved transit access to an airport benefit air travelers, but enhanced service could be mutually beneficial to the region, business interests and to the community at large. Project Purpose This research project had two objectives: 1) prepare a guidebook to help airports and transportation planning agencies develop compatible ground access and surface transportation plans; and 2) develop a detailed education and outreach plan that could be implemented in a future Phase 2 of the project. This report summarizes the research approach, presents the major findings of the data collection, offers a guidebook for collaborative ground access and transportation planning, and recommends
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entire Bulletin
    Volume 49 Number 51 Saturday, December 21, 2019 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 7389—7560 Agencies in this issue The Courts Department of Banking and Securities Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Human Services Department of Labor and Industry Department of Transportation Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Housing Finance Agency Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission State Employees’ Retirement Board Susquehanna River Basin Commission Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): Pennsylvania Bulletin Pennsylvania No. 541, December 2019 TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY Attn: 800 Church Rd. W. 17055-3198 PA Mechanicsburg, FRY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. COMMUNICATIONS, FRY CUT ON DOTTED LINES AND ENCLOSE IN AN ENVELOPE CHANGE NOTICE/NEW SUBSCRIPTION If information on mailing label is incorrect, please email changes to [email protected] or mail to: mail or [email protected] to changes email please incorrect, is label mailing on information If (City) (State) (Zip Code) label) mailing on name above number digit (6 NUMBER CUSTOMER NAME INDIVIDUAL OF NAME—TITLE OFFICE ADDRESS (Number and Street) (City) (State) (Zip The Pennsylvania Bulletin is published weekly by Fry PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Communications, Inc. for the Commonwealth of Pennsylva- nia, Legislative Reference Bureau, 641 Main Capitol Build- (ISSN 0162-2137) ing, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120, under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Docu- ments under 45 Pa.C.S. Part II (relating to publication and effectiveness of Commonwealth documents). The subscrip- tion rate is $87.00 per year, postpaid to points in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Element
    NOISE ELEMENT Prepared by: Planning & Development Services County of Imperial 801 Main Street El Centro, California 92243-2875 JIM MINNICK Planning Director Approved by: Board of Supervisors October 6, 2015 NOISE ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Preface 1 B. Purpose of the Noise Element 1 C. Noise Measurement 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS 4 A. Preface 4 B. Noise Sources 4 C. Sensitive Receptors 13 III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 14 A. Preface 14 B. Goals and Objectives 14 C. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements 15 IV. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 17 A. Preface 17 B. Noise Impact Zones 17 C. Noise/Land Use Compatibility Standards 18 D. Programs and Policies 23 APPENDICES A. Glossary of Terms A-1 B. Airport Noise Contour Maps B-1 Planning & Development Services Noise Element Page ii (Adopted November 9, 1993 MO#18) (Revised October 6, 2015 MO#18b) LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page 1. Existing Noise Sources 5 B-1 Future Noise Contours Brawley Municipal Airport B-1 B-2 Future Noise Impact Area Calexico International Airport B-2 B-3 Future Noise Impact Area Calipatria Municipal Airport B-3 B-4 Future Noise Impact Area Imperial County Airport B-4 B-5 Future Noise Impact Area NAF El Centro B-5 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page 1. Typical Sound Levels 3 2. Existing Railroad Noise Levels 6 3. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic and Noise Data (Existing Conditions) 8 4. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic And Noise Data (Future/Year 2015 Conditions) 10 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Open the Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan Announces Support for the Trestle and the Trail by Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair
    HERESCENT Fall 1999 Vol X No. 4 Coalition Hosts "Open The Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan announces support for the trestle and the Trail By Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair One of the best ways to build support and stewardship of the Capital Crescent Trail is to provide opportunities for trail users and local residents to experience trail advocacy in a personal way. On Saturday, October 23d, the Coalition for the Capital Crescent Trail did just that. Trail lovers from all around the metropolitan area participated in Coalition-sponsored hikes, both walking and biking, to the Rock Creek Park trestle for an "Open The Trestle" rally. Several Coalition Board members addressed the rally, and outlined why I repairing and opening the trestle for Trail use was essential for completing a first class interim trail to Silver Spring. Results of a Coalition sponsored I engineering design study were presented that show how the trestle can be rebuilt for Trail use at a t Dozrg Dz~ncanut rally fraction of the cost of building a new bridge. Joining rally participants was Montgomery County Executive, Mr. Doug Duncan, who spoke in support of completing the Trail. In a surprise announcement, Mr. Duncan pledged to put funding to rebuild the trestle in the upcoming FY 2001-2002 budget. He challenged trail supporters to do their part and get the support of the five County Council members needed to pass the budget. Mr. Duncan's pledge of support is a very welcome event, and allows the Coalition to focus its advocacy for the trestle on the Montgomery County council.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study
    Imperial County Airport (IPL) Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study Study Overview Michael Baker International, Inc., was tasked by the City of El Centro, California to evaluate the proposed re-zoning of four vacant parcels within the vicinity of Imperial County Airport (IPL). As shown in the graphics throughout this study, the parcels are identified by Imperial County as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 044-620-049, 044-620-050, 044-620-051, and 044- 620-053. The parcels are located at the northwest and southwest corners of Cruickshank Drive and 8th Street and are currently zoned as Residential Airport Zone (RAP) and fall within the B2 Zone (Extended Approach/Departure Zone) of the 1996 IPL Land Use Compatibility Plan and Map. Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed characteristics of the four parcels. Since the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) last updated the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, the B2 Zone is no longer defined in the same manner and some zones around runways are also defined differently for Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs). Therefore, it was necessary to review existing activity data and conditions at IPL in comparison to updated Caltrans guidance to determine if the proposed parcel re-zonings would produce incompatible land uses and/or airspace impacts. Table 1 Existing and Proposed Parcel Characteristics Zoning Land Use Parcel # Acreage Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML R-R GI Source: Michael Baker International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing)
    Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, Fares 2021 Governor Ritchie Highway For more information, or to request From Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3; from Kent LEGEND • College Parkway this document in an alternate format or Island to Washington D.C. is Zone 4. 250 Line Bus Stop translated into another language, please Zone 3 Zone 4 Park & Ride One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 50 contact the department listed below. d One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 ’s Roa ret Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 arga M t. Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 G S Para mayor información o para solicitar en 301 250 e Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 ral 450 s H este documento en un formato alternativo o ig 50 179 h Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 w a Romancoke Road y 2 traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) 178 70 Rowe Boulevard 648 450 departamento enlistado abajo. • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS To Washington Rowe Boulevard 450 Commuter Direct MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION via Davidsonville P&R 2 Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com DAVIDSONVILLE 301 50 W 70 Phone: 410-697-2212 es 50 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 450 t Str 301 450 Main Street Kent Narrows 2 eet ad 665 Park & Ride Charm Pass (mobile ticket) KENT ISLAND AND Ro lvd 8 iva Aris T B R Stevensville M 式或译成其它语言的本文档， Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass ain Str d Park & Ride ee TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway
    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan
    Regional Payment Systems Partnership Action Plan September 25, 2000 Vollpe Natiionall Transportatiion Systems Center Regional Payment Systems Partnership: Phase I Action Plan Virginia Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................................1 2 Context...........................................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Regional Electronic Payment Systems Coordination.........................................................................5 2.1.1 General Concept............................................................................................................................5 2.1.2 Contactless Card Standards and Interoperability........................................................................9 2.1.2.1 Types of Cards and Standards .................................................................................................9 2.1.2.2 System Interoperability..........................................................................................................10 2.1.3 Benefits........................................................................................................................................10 2.1.3.1 Increasing Customer Convenience........................................................................................10 2.1.3.2 Improve Operational Efficiency............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore City
    November 2007 BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiI I 12/12/2007 9:34:38 AM This page left blank intentionally. 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiII II 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM Table of Contents | Transportation Outlook 2035 Table of Contents Executive Summary What is Transportation Outlook 2035? ..................................................................................... iii Introduction, Section 1 Planning Process For Transportation Outlook 2035 ..............................iv Introduction, Section 2 Will Transportation Outlook 2035 Be Successful? ...............................vii Introduction, Section 3 Addressing the Funding Shortfall ......................................................ix Chapter One Transportation Planning in the Baltimore Region ........................................................................3 Chapter 1, Section 1 The Baltimore Regional Transportation Board ......................................4 Chapter 1, Section 2 Metropolitan Planning Area .............................................................5 Chapter 1, Section 3 SAFETEA-LU ...............................................................................6 Chapter 1, Section 4 Regional Transportation Planning Process ...........................................9 Chapter 1, Section 5 Goals, Strategies, and Supporting Actions ......................................... 14 Baltimore Regional Transportation Board I 2. Table of Contents - TO2035 FiSec1:I Sec1:I 12/12/2007 9:34:49 AM TRANSPORTATION OUTLOOK 2035
    [Show full text]
  • Commuterdirect.Com for Pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis Departamento Enlistado Abajo
    To Severna Park Rvsd 7/21 Annapolis Fares EFFECTIVE JUNE 27, For more information, or to request • From Kent Island to Washington, D.C. is Zone 4; from Annapolis and 2021 this document in an alternate format or Davidsonville to Washington, D.C. is Zone 3. Zone 3 Zone 4 translated into another language, please One Way – Full Fare $6.00 $7.00 301 contact the department listed below. One Way – Senior/Disability Fare $5.00 $6.00 50 Ten Trip – Full Fare $60.00 $70.00 Ten Trip – Senior/Disability $50.00 $60.00 Para mayor información o para solicitar LEGEND Monthly Pass Full Fare $204.00 $238.00 220 No. 220 Route este documento en un formato alternativo o Monthly Pass – Senior/Disability $170.00 $204.00 Midday/last PM trip traducido a otro idioma, por favor contacte el Transit Link Card (refer to commuterdirect.com for pricing) Bus Stop • Commuter Bus Ticket Sales COMMUTER BUS Annapolis departamento enlistado abajo. Park & Ride 2 Commuter Direct 15th St. MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 4th St. U St. 7th St. U St. Website: MTA.CommuterDirect.com 70 U St. TO 70 Downtown Washington, D.C. Phone: 410-697-2212 9th St. Downtown Washington, D.C. 14th St. 13th St. 3rd St. 2nd St. 11th St. 9th St. 欲了解更多信息或欲索取另一种格 12th St. 12th St. T St. 178 Bestgate Rd. Charm Pass (mobile ticket) ANNAPOLIS T St. Website: mta.maryland.gov/charmpass General's Hwy. 2 式或译成其它语言的本文档， WASHINGTON, D.C. Florida Ave. To Kent Island Phone: 833-242-7622 8th St. New Hampshire Ave. 16th St.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Newsletter 2012-12\APA Newsletter 2012 Dec #09.Odt Page 1 of 19 2012-11-27 06:44 APA NEWSLETTER 2012 December Asa Dean, Editor
    Arizona Pilots Association http://www.azpilots.org C:\Documents and Settings\Asa\My Documents\Aviation\Clubs\APA\Newsletter\APA Newsletter 2012-12\APA Newsletter 2012 Dec #09.odt Page 1 of 19 2012-11-27 06:44 APA NEWSLETTER 2012 December Asa Dean, Editor Table of Contents Executive Director’s Report, Dec, 2012......................3 Jim Timm, Executive Director.......................................3 December Accident Summary.....................................5 Jim Timm......................................................................5 Backcountry Weekend in Style..................................11 Mark Spencer..............................................................11 El Tiro........................................................................12 By Ron Stafford..........................................................12 Flying Clubs Revisited..............................................13 Howard Deevers..........................................................13 Best thing since ….....................................................14 Tod Dickey..................................................................14 Back Country Schedule.............................................15 Tommy Thomason.......................................................15 2012 Safety Program Schedule.................................16 Fred Gibbs, Safety Seminar Director...........................16 Wingman Poster........................................................17 Fred Gibbs...................................................................17
    [Show full text]