Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study Imperial County Airport (IPL) Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study Study Overview Michael Baker International, Inc., was tasked by the City of El Centro, California to evaluate the proposed re-zoning of four vacant parcels within the vicinity of Imperial County Airport (IPL). As shown in the graphics throughout this study, the parcels are identified by Imperial County as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 044-620-049, 044-620-050, 044-620-051, and 044- 620-053. The parcels are located at the northwest and southwest corners of Cruickshank Drive and 8th Street and are currently zoned as Residential Airport Zone (RAP) and fall within the B2 Zone (Extended Approach/Departure Zone) of the 1996 IPL Land Use Compatibility Plan and Map. Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed characteristics of the four parcels. Since the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) last updated the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, the B2 Zone is no longer defined in the same manner and some zones around runways are also defined differently for Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs). Therefore, it was necessary to review existing activity data and conditions at IPL in comparison to updated Caltrans guidance to determine if the proposed parcel re-zonings would produce incompatible land uses and/or airspace impacts. Table 1 Existing and Proposed Parcel Characteristics Zoning Land Use Parcel # Acreage Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML R-R GI Source: Michael Baker International, Inc. and City of El Centro, California. RAP – Residential Airport Zone CG – Commercial General ML – Light Manufacturing R-R – Rural Residential GC – General Commercial GI – General Industrial Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update As mentioned, Caltrans last updated the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook in 2011, while the associated ALUCP zones around IPL were adopted in 1996 (updated in 2004) and represent Imperial County’s official ALUCP at this time (refer to Figure 1). The ALUCP zones are a function of the runway length, the type of activity the airport experiences, the precision of the approaches to the runway ends, the traffic patterns around the runways, and the category of the airport (general aviation, commercial, military, etc.). Caltrans also allows some subjective judgement to be applied in the determination of the sizes and shapes of the surfaces surrounding each runway, which are based on unique circumstances and/or operating procedures associated with the runway. October 27, 2016 1 Imperial County Airport (IPL) Figure 1 1996 IPL Compatibility Map Source: Imperial County, California. October 27, 2016 2 Imperial County Airport (IPL) Imperial County Airport is included in the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) and is therefore eligible to receive Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants for eligible projects and studies. IPL is identified as a Regional Commercial Service Airport in the NPIAS and is also a Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 139 that is certificated to accommodate scheduled small air carrier aircraft with 10 to 30 seats. The airport receives financial subsidies from the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) to provide airline service under the Essential Air Service (EAS) program, which is a program that is intended to assist small communities with providing access to the national aviation system. Airline service at IPL has historically been conducted using medium-sized turboprop aircraft (e.g., nine passenger Cessna 208 Grand Caravans). The purpose bringing this up is because the size of the shapes in the ALUCP differ between general aviation and commercial service airports (refer to sample graphics in Table 2). Because of the nature of the activity at IPL, types of runway approaches, and physical characteristics of the airport, it may be appropriate to identify Runway 14-32 as a general aviation runway as part of an ALUCP. Note that this effort was conducted to determine if Imperial County’s ALUCP was consistent with today’s guidelines, but does not constitute an ALUCP update or policy change. Consequently, the information presented in this study is provided to compare the development restrictions between the existing 1996 ALUCP for IPL to what the current development restrictions might look like under today’s Caltrans regulations. The following assumptions went into the development of the potential 2016 ALUCP in Figure 2: 1. Based on the safety zones for a Medium General Aviation Runway with modifications to illustrate the applicable FAA criteria for IPL. 2. All runway approaches at IPL are currently visual. 3. The runways accommodate regular use by aircraft with maximum certificated takeoff weights of more than 12,500 pounds. Regular use is defined as 500 or more annual operations. 4. In Zone 1, the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) dimensions are based on a Runway Design Code (RDC) of B-II. 5. The following traffic patterns apply to IPL: Runway 14 (left hand), Runway 32 (right hand), Runway 8 (left hand), Runway 26 (right hand). 6. No future runway extensions or instrument approaches were considered. The potential ALUCP in Figure 2 has different zone names and shapes than the 1996 one. Based on the 1996 map, the proposed parcel re-zonings are located in the B2 Zone (Extended Approach/Departure Zone), whereas current Caltrans guidance may suggest that the parcels are located in a combination of Zone 5 (Outer Approach/ Departure Zone) and Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone). A summary of the development requirements within the 1996 and current zones is summarized in Table 3 for the four parcels. As shown, current Caltrans ALUCP requirements may actually be less restrictive for the proposed developments on those parcels. For example, the allowable uses, accident risk levels, and maximum densities may currently be less restrictive today than in 1996, and the proposed re-zonings may allow for the development of land uses that are more appropriate with current Caltrans. Therefore, this document should be viewed as a talking point between the City of El Centro and Imperial County regarding any proposed developments within the vicinity of the airport. October 27, 2016 3 Imperial County Airport (IPL) Table 2 Example General Aviation vs. Large Air Carrier Runway ALUCP Medium General Aviation Runway Large Air Carrier Runway Source: Caltrans 2011 California Airport Lan Use Planning Handbook. October 27, 2016 4 Imperial County Airport Legend N Zone 1: Runway Protection Zone Zone 2: Inner Approach / Departure Zone Zone 3: Inner Turning Zone Zone 4: Outer Approach / Departure Zone Zone 5: Sideline Zone Zone 6: Traffic Pattern Zone Parcels Imperial Avenue West Worthington Road 14 End El. -55.1' (14 - Left Hand) Airport Road 26 End El. -55.0' 32 End El. -53.9' 8 End El. -55.1' (32 - Right Hand) (8 - Left Hand) (26 - Right Hand) West Aten Road 8th Street La Brucherie Road 044-620-053 (ML) Cruickshank Drive 044-620-050 (CG) 0 2,000' 4,000' 044-620-049 (CG) 044-620-051 (CG) Scale: 1" = 2,000' Figure 2 Potential 2016 ALUCP (Runway 14-32) Imperial County Airport (IPL) Table 3 Comparison of 1996 and Current Caltrans ACULP Requirements Zoning Zoning Permitted Maximum Urban Densities (Per Acre) Required Open Land Parcel # Acreage Caltrans Zone Risk Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Residential Units Other People Percentage Actual (Acre) 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG 1996 B2 Zone Not Normally Not Normally Significant 1 100 30% 0.62 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG Current Zone 4 Limit Normally Moderate Per Comparable Surrounding 150-200 Per Code TBD 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG Current Zone 6 Yes Yes Low No Limit No Limit Per Code TBD 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG 1996 B2 Zone Not Normally Not Normally Significant 1 100 30% 0.32 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG Current Zone 4 Limit Normally Moderate Per Comparable Surrounding 150-200 Per Code TBD 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG Current Zone 6 Yes Yes Low No Limit No Limit Per Code TBD 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG 1996 B2 Zone Not Normally Not Normally Significant 1 100 30% 5.17 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG Current Zone 4 Limit Normally Moderate Per Comparable Surrounding 150-200 Per Code TBD 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG Current Zone 6 Yes Yes Low No Limit No Limit Per Code TBD 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML 1996 B2 Zone Not Normally Normally Significant 1 100 30% 6.54 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML Current Zone 4 Limit Normally Moderate Per Comparable Surrounding 150-200 Per Code TBD 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML Current Zone 6 Yes Yes Low No Limit No Limit Per Code TBD Sources: Michael Baker International Inc, Caltrans 2011 California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, and 1996 IPL Compatibility Map. RAP – Residential Airport Zone CG – Commercial General ML – Light Manufacturing October 27, 2016 6 Imperial County Airport (IPL) Airspace Considerations Because the proposed parcel re-zonings are located within 20,000 feet of IPL, they may be subject to FAA airspace review prior to development, which must be submitted through the FAA’s Obstruction Evaluation/Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) portal. Figure 3 illustrates the strictest approach and departure surfaces over the four parcels. The Runway 32 approach surface extends out beginning 200 feet from Runway 32. It starts at the Runway 32 end elevation of -53.9 feet Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) and extends up at a rate of one foot vertical for every 20 feet horizontal.
Recommended publications
  • Noise Element
    NOISE ELEMENT Prepared by: Planning & Development Services County of Imperial 801 Main Street El Centro, California 92243-2875 JIM MINNICK Planning Director Approved by: Board of Supervisors October 6, 2015 NOISE ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Preface 1 B. Purpose of the Noise Element 1 C. Noise Measurement 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS 4 A. Preface 4 B. Noise Sources 4 C. Sensitive Receptors 13 III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 14 A. Preface 14 B. Goals and Objectives 14 C. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements 15 IV. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 17 A. Preface 17 B. Noise Impact Zones 17 C. Noise/Land Use Compatibility Standards 18 D. Programs and Policies 23 APPENDICES A. Glossary of Terms A-1 B. Airport Noise Contour Maps B-1 Planning & Development Services Noise Element Page ii (Adopted November 9, 1993 MO#18) (Revised October 6, 2015 MO#18b) LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page 1. Existing Noise Sources 5 B-1 Future Noise Contours Brawley Municipal Airport B-1 B-2 Future Noise Impact Area Calexico International Airport B-2 B-3 Future Noise Impact Area Calipatria Municipal Airport B-3 B-4 Future Noise Impact Area Imperial County Airport B-4 B-5 Future Noise Impact Area NAF El Centro B-5 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page 1. Typical Sound Levels 3 2. Existing Railroad Noise Levels 6 3. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic and Noise Data (Existing Conditions) 8 4. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic And Noise Data (Future/Year 2015 Conditions) 10 5.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Newsletter 2012-12\APA Newsletter 2012 Dec #09.Odt Page 1 of 19 2012-11-27 06:44 APA NEWSLETTER 2012 December Asa Dean, Editor
    Arizona Pilots Association http://www.azpilots.org C:\Documents and Settings\Asa\My Documents\Aviation\Clubs\APA\Newsletter\APA Newsletter 2012-12\APA Newsletter 2012 Dec #09.odt Page 1 of 19 2012-11-27 06:44 APA NEWSLETTER 2012 December Asa Dean, Editor Table of Contents Executive Director’s Report, Dec, 2012......................3 Jim Timm, Executive Director.......................................3 December Accident Summary.....................................5 Jim Timm......................................................................5 Backcountry Weekend in Style..................................11 Mark Spencer..............................................................11 El Tiro........................................................................12 By Ron Stafford..........................................................12 Flying Clubs Revisited..............................................13 Howard Deevers..........................................................13 Best thing since ….....................................................14 Tod Dickey..................................................................14 Back Country Schedule.............................................15 Tommy Thomason.......................................................15 2012 Safety Program Schedule.................................16 Fred Gibbs, Safety Seminar Director...........................16 Wingman Poster........................................................17 Fred Gibbs...................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN Site Selection Conference NEWS Calexico to Have a New
    IVEDC's Weekly Update for Monday, June 7, 2010 | Volume 3 | Issue 33 Investors: BULLETIN New and Renewing Site Selection Conference Diamond (4) IVEDC is attending an Area Developments Consultants Conference & Foreign Direct Investment Conference this week in San Francisco, CA. This is a great opportunity for Imperial Valley to get in front of site selectors and foreign investors. For more information, contact [email protected] NEWS Calexico to Have a New Medical Facility By Mario Conde Imperial Irrigation District The announcement came this past Tuesday that the City of Calexico will have a new medical facility to be located at Town Center Plaza. To read the entire article, click here BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Imperial County IVEDC is currently working with a European client who is interested in Imperial Valley for its packaging, distribution and assembly facility. We are also assisting a client interested in 30 acres in southern Imperial County for a facility that would create 200 plus jobs. IVEDC continues to follow up with leads from Mexport. IVEDC is designing a business retention program for Imperial Valley. SDG & E For more information on these items, contact [email protected] IVEDC, Imperial Irrigation District and the County of Imperial all met with a solar developer last week to assist in locating a site that best suits their needs. This was the second time IVEDC met with this company and was a direct result of an RFI. For EW Corporation more information, contact [email protected] UPCOMING IVEDC EVENTS Platinum (7) Aviation Day City of Brawley City of El Centro October 23, 2010 Imperial Valley Press Imperial County Airport Imperial Valley College For more information, contact [email protected] KSWT 13 KXO Radio BUSINESS TOOLS Wells Fargo CDC Log on To Tools for Business Success Gold (9) The tools is hosted by Imperial Valley Economic Development City of Imperial Corporation to help businesses in our community succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • I 38962 Federal Register. / Vol. 57, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 1992
    I 38962 Federal Register. / Vol. 57, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 1992 / Rul~s and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Under the-amended part 71 effective Discussion of the· Amendments and September 15. 1993. positive control Public COmments Federal Aviation Administration areas (PCAs), iet routes. and area bigh . routes are classified as Class A airspace This final rule is·ba'sed on NPRM No. 14 CFR Part 71 areas; TCAs are classified as Class B 92-5 [57 FR 18954; May·l. 1992). The rule (Docket No. 26852j Amendment No. 71-16) airspace areas; ARSAs are classified as amends part 71 by revising all control Class C airspace areas; control zones zones and transition areas as well as RIN 2120-AE18 and airport traffic Breas for airports specific TCAs and ARSAs described in with operating control towers that are FAA Order 7400.7, Cl:;)mpilatipn of Terminal Airspace Reconfiguration not associated with the primary airport Regulations, effective November 1, 1991 AGENCY: Federal Aviation of a TCA or an ARSA are classified as' ["Handbook"), which is incorporated by Administration [FAA), DOT. Class D airspace areas; all other reference in 14 CFR 71.1. This final rule controlled airspace areas are classified also modifies the corresponding Class B, ACTION: Final rule. as Class E airspace areas; and airspace Class C, Class D, and Class E airspace SUMMARY: This final rule amends the that is not otherwise designated as a descriptions in FAA Order 7400.9, Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) by controlled airspace area is classified as Airspace Reclassification, effective revising all control zones and transition Class G airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial County Planning Contacts Guide, 2017
    JANUARY 2017 IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING CONTACTS GUIDE ANDRADE PORT OF ENTRY Acronym: Website: cbp.gov/contact/ports/andrade-class Type: Federal Planning Area(s): Homeland Security The Andrade Port of Entry (POE) is located at the southern terminus of State Route 186 at the international border. It is a small two-acre site constructed in 1970. It has two primary inspection lanes, four pedestrian lanes, one lane for occasional commercial crossings, and a main building and residence for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. On an average day in 2014, approximately 1,200 privately-owned vehicles and 2,200 pedestrians entered the U.S. through this POE. BRAWLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Acronym: Website: brawleychamber.com Type: Business Planning Area(s): Economic Development The Brawley Chamber of Commerce promotes and champions business growth and vitality for those who live, visit, and work in the community. The Chamber focuses on five core competencies—creating a strong local economy, promoting the community, providing networking opportunities, representing the interest of business with government, and administering political action. CALEXICO EAST PORT OF ENTRY Acronym: Website: cbp.gov/contact/ports/calexico-east-class Type: Federal Planning Area(s): Homeland Security The east crossing was built in 1996 in an effort to divert traffic from the busy Calexico West Port of Entry (POE) in Downtown Calexico, California. Since that time, all truck traffic entering the U.S. from Mexicali is inspected at Calexico East. The facility is constructed of tent-like canopies and includes a bridge that crosses the All American Canal. It has a full range of cargo processing functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Air Facility (NAF)
    NAVAL AIR FACILITY EL CENTRO ECONOMIC IMPACT For Official Use Only: May Not Be Releasable under FOIA. December 2007 Do Not Forward to Persons without a Demonstrated Official Need for the Information Contained Herein Leadership Welcome We are pleased to present the following Economic Impact information for NAF El Centro. The following document provides unclassified key information about the economic contribution of the installation on the surrounding community. NAF El Centro continues to enjoy an atmosphere of mutual respect, cooperation, strong teamwork, and common interest in economic enhancement with our local communities. Our mission is to provide base support to Naval Aviation Squadrons and maintain target ranges for their weapons and combat air training. The installation also supports Marine Aviation units, air elements from the US Army and US Air Force, and international units. It is significant to note that the base’s economic impact on our surrounding communities exceeds $115.5 million. In fiscal year 2006, military and civilian payrolls, combined with various construction and service contracts, enhanced the local economic impact by generating 1,300 direct and indirect jobs. We are proud of the enthusiastic relationship we enjoy with our local communities and throughout the Imperial Valley. The commitment of our people to the success of NAF El Centro will continue to exert a significant, positive economic influence for many years to come. Captain James A. Hubbard Commanding Officer NAF El Centro MISSION “...to provide base support to Naval Aviation Squadrons and maintain target ranges for their weapons and combat air training. The installation also supports Marine Aviation units, air elements from the US Army and US Air Force, and international units”.
    [Show full text]
  • May 6, 2017 Demo
    IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote_Mountains#/media/File:Coyote_Mountains.png May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event Documentation For the Imperial County PM10 Nonattainment Area An exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM10 at the Brawley, Calexico, El Centro, Niland and Westmorland monitor in California on May 6, 2017 May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 I.1 Public Notification [40 CFR §50.14(c)(1)] .............................................................. 3 I.2 Initial Notification of Potential Exceptional Event (INPEE) (40 CFR §50.14 (c)(2)) ................................................................................................... 3 I.3 Public Comment Process [40 CFR §50.14(c)(3)(v)(A-C)] .................................. 4 I.4 Mitigation of Exceptional Events [40 CFR §51.930] .......................................... 4 II Conceptual Model – A narrative that describes the event causing the exceedance and a discussion of how emissions from the event led to the exceedance at the affected monitor .................................................................................... 9 II.1 Description of the event causing the exceedance ............................................ 9 II.2 How emissions from the event led to an exceedance ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update April
    Ju IMPERIAL COUNTY M ULTI-JURISDICTION AZARD ITIGATION H M PLAN UPDATE APRIL 2014 Imperial County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update April 2014 Adoption by Local Governing Body: §201.6(c)(5) County of Imperial RESOLUTION OF THE COUTY OF IMPERIAL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADOPTING THE IMPERIAL COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE RESOLUTION NO. __________ WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all jurisdictions to be covered by a Pre- Disaster All Hazards Mitigation Plan to be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency pre- and post-disaster mitigation funds; and WHEREAS, the County of Imperial recognizes that no community is immune from natural, technological or domestic security hazards, whether it be earthquake, flood, severe winter weather, drought, heat wave, wildfire or dam failure related; and recognizes the importance of enhancing its ability to withstand hazards as well as the importance of reducing human suffering, property damage, interruption of public services and economic losses caused by those hazards; and WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and California Office of Emergency Services have developed a hazards mitigation program that assists communities in their efforts to become Disaster-Resistant Communities that focus, not just on disaster response and recovery, but also on preparedness and hazard mitigation, which enhances economic sustainability, environmental stability and social well-being; and WHEREAS, Imperial County fully participated in the Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Activity Forecast
    AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST August 2008 Jacobs Consultancy Team TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................ES‐1 ES.1 The Price of Air Travel ...................................................................................ES‐2 ES.2 The Ability to Pay for Air Travel..................................................................ES‐3 ES.3 Enplanements Forecast ..................................................................................ES‐5 ES.4 Air Cargo Tonnage Forecast..........................................................................ES‐6 ES.5 Aircraft Operations Forecast .........................................................................ES‐8 1 FORECAST APPROACH ................................................................................................. 1‐1 2 ECONOMIC BASE THAT GENERATES AIR TRAVEL DEMAND....................... 2‐1 2.1 SDIA Catchment Area...................................................................................... 2‐2 2.2 San Diego County Socio‐Economic Trends................................................... 2‐3 2.2.1 Population.................................................................................................... 2‐4 2.2.2 Income Trends ............................................................................................. 2‐7 2.2.3 Employment .............................................................................................. 2‐10 2.3 Tourism/Cruise Industry
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation & Airport Ground Access
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AVIATION AND AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 18 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 19 EXISTING CONDITIONS 23 STRATEGIES 31 NEXT STEPS 36 CONCLUSION 40 REFERENCES 41 TECHNICAL REPORT AVIATION AND AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM The SCAG region is home to seven commercial airports with scheduled passenger service, seven government/military air fields, and over 30 reliever Aviation and Airport and general aviation airports. On a daily basis, the region’s airports provide service to hundreds of thousands of air passengers, and thousands of tons of cargo. Moreover, the airports in the SCAG region employ approximately 60,000 Ground Access people onsite. Therefore, thousands of passengers, employees, and goods are traveling the region’s roads, highways, and transit systems to get to and from the airports. As a metropolitan planning organization (MPO), SCAG does not have any regulatory, developmental, operational, or planning authority over the airports. Rather, SCAG is primarily a regional surface transportation planning agency that maintains a list of airport ground access projects and a consultative relationship with the airports. Therefore, SCAG is focused on air and passenger cargo activity from the perspective of how the traffic coming and going from the airports affects the region’s roads, highways, and transit system. One critical aspect of SCAG’s role in aviation systems and transportation planning is the Aviation Element of the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020 RTP/SCS) (Connect SoCal).
    [Show full text]
  • October 20, 2014 9:00 A.M
    BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY Regular Meeting of Monday, October 20, 2014 9:00 A.M. NOTE TO THE PUBLIC: Prior to consideration of business items, the Authority invites comment on airport-related matters during the Public Comment period. Members of the public are requested to observe the following decorum when attending or participating in meetings of the Commission: • Turn off cellular telephones and pagers. • Refrain from disorderly or boisterous conduct, including loud, threatening, profane, or abusive language, clapping, whistling, stamping, or other acts that disrupt or otherwise render unfeasible the orderly conduct of the meeting. • If you desire to address the Commission during the Public Comment period, fill out a speaker request card and present it to the Commission’s secretary. • Limit public comments to five minutes, or such other period of time as may be specified by the presiding officer, and confine remarks to matters that are on the Commission’s agenda for consideration or are otherwise within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Any discloseable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Authority to the Commission less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at Bob Hope Airport (2627 Hollywood Way, Burbank) in the administrative office during normal business hours. ? ? ? In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, if you require a disability-related modification or accommodation to attend or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please call the Board Secretary at (818) 840-8840 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.
    [Show full text]