May 6, 2017 Demo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 6, 2017 Demo IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote_Mountains#/media/File:Coyote_Mountains.png May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event Documentation For the Imperial County PM10 Nonattainment Area An exceedance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM10 at the Brawley, Calexico, El Centro, Niland and Westmorland monitor in California on May 6, 2017 May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 I.1 Public Notification [40 CFR §50.14(c)(1)] .............................................................. 3 I.2 Initial Notification of Potential Exceptional Event (INPEE) (40 CFR §50.14 (c)(2)) ................................................................................................... 3 I.3 Public Comment Process [40 CFR §50.14(c)(3)(v)(A-C)] .................................. 4 I.4 Mitigation of Exceptional Events [40 CFR §51.930] .......................................... 4 II Conceptual Model – A narrative that describes the event causing the exceedance and a discussion of how emissions from the event led to the exceedance at the affected monitor .................................................................................... 9 II.1 Description of the event causing the exceedance ............................................ 9 II.2 How emissions from the event led to an exceedance .................................... 10 III Clear Causal Relationship – A demonstration that the event affected air quality illustrating the relationship between the event and the monitored exceedance .................................................................................................................................. 18 III.1 Summary of Forecasts and Warnings ................................................................... 32 III.2 Summary of Wind Observations ............................................................................ 32 IV Concentration to Concentration Analysis – An analyses comparing the event- influenced concentrations to concentrations at the same monitoring site at other times .............................................................................................................................. 33 V Both Not Reasonably Controllable and Not Reasonably Preventable – A demonstration that the event was both not reasonably controllable and not reasonably preventable ........................................................................................................... 44 V.1 Wind Observations ...................................................................................................... 45 V.2 Review of Source Permitted Inspections and Public Complaints ............... 46 VI A Natural Event – A demonstration that the event was a human activity that is unlikely to recur at a particular location or was a natural event .............................. 49 VI.1 Affects Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 49 VI.2 Not Reasonably Controllable or Preventable .................................................... 49 VI.3 Natural Event ................................................................................................................. 50 VI.4 Clear Causal Relationship .......................................................................................... 50 i May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents VI.5 Concentration to Concentration Analysis ........................................................... 50 VI.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 51 Appendix A: National Weather Service Notices ......................................................................... 52 Appendix B: Wind Data ...................................................................................................................... 161 Appendix C: Public Information and other Notices ................................................................. 167 ii May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE Figure 1-1 Imperial County ............................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1-2 Monitoring Sites in And Around Imperial County ............................................ 8 Figure 2-1 Monitoring and Meteorological Sites .................................................................. 11 Figure 2-2 Concentrations for All Sites Listed In Table 2-1 ................................................ 13 Figure 2-3 Local and Vicinity Airport Wind Speeds And Gust .......................................... 14 Figure 2-4 Wind Speeds and Gust Upstream Sites ............................................................... 15 Figure 2-5 HYSPLIT Model All Sites May 6, 2017 Ending 1200 PST ................................ 16 Figure 2-6 HYSPLIT Model All Sites May 6, 2017 Ending 1700 PST ................................ 17 Figure 3-1 MODIS Satellite Image May 6, 2017 ..................................................................... 19 Figure 3-2 Visual Ramp-up Analysis as Discussed for May 6, 2017 ................................ 20 Figure 3-3 72-Hour Time Series PM10 Concentrations and Visibility .............................. 21 Figure 3-4 Imperial Valley Air Quality Index for Brawley May 6, 2017 ........................... 29 Figure 3-5 Imperial Valley Air Quality Index for Calexico May 6, 2017 .......................... 30 Figure 3-6 Imperial Valley Air Quality Index for El Centro May 6, 2017 ........................ 30 Figure 3-7 Imperial Valley Air Quality Index for Niland May 6, 2017 ............................. 31 Figure 3-8 Imperial Valley Air Quality Index for Westmorland May 6, 2017 ............... 31 Figure 4-1 Brawley Historical Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations January 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .............................................. 34 iii May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents Figure 4-2 Calexico Historical Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations January 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .............................................. 35 Figure 4-3 El Centro Historical Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations January 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .............................................. 36 Figure 4-4 Niland Historical Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations January 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .............................................. 37 Figure 4-5 Westmorland Historical Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations January 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .............................................. 38 Figure 4-6 Brawley Seasonal Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations April 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .................................................... 39 Figure 4-7 Calexico Seasonal Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations April 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .................................................... 40 Figure 4-8 El Centro Seasonal Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations April 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .................................................... 41 Figure 4-9 Niland Seasonal Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations April 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .................................................... 42 Figure 4-10 Westmorland Seasonal Comparison FRM and FEM PM10 24-Hr Avg Concentrations April 1, 2010 to May 6, 2017 .................................................... 43 Figure 5-1 Regulation VIII Graphic Timeline Development ................................................ 45 Figure 5-2 Permitted Sources ....................................................................................................... 47 Figure 5-3 Non-Permitted Sources ............................................................................................. 48 iv May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE Table 1-1 Title 40 CFR §50.14(c)(3)(iv) Checklist .................................................................... 1 Table 1-2 Procedural Checklist .................................................................................................... 2 Table 2-1 Hourly Concentrations of Particulate Matter ..................................................... 12 Table 3-1 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations for Brawley May 6, 2017 ............. 23 Table 3-2 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations for Calexico May 6, 2017 ............ 24 Table 3-3 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations for El Centro May 6, 2017 .......... 25 Table 3-4 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations for Niland May 6, 2017 ............... 26 Table 3-5 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations for Westmorland May 6, 2017 .................................................................................................................... 27 Table 3-6 Wind Speeds and PM10 Concentrations All Monitors May 6, 2017 ........... 28 v May 6, 2017 Exceptional Event, Imperial County Table of Contents ACRONYM DESCRIPTIONS AOD Aerosol Optical Depth AQI Air Quality Index AQS Air Quality System BACM Best Available Control Measures BAM 1020 Beta Attenuation Monitor Model 1020 BLM United States Bureau of Land Management BP United States Border Patrol CAA Clean Air Act CARB
Recommended publications
  • Attachment 1: Peer City Memo
    Attachment 1:City of San Diego TPA Parking Regulations for Non-Residential Uses DRAFT: Peer City Review Memo May 2021 Prepared by: 3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, California 92103 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Peer City Selection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Peer Cities’ Regulations and Demographics .................................................................................................. 7 SALT LAKE CITY ............................................................................................................................................... 7 SEATTLE .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 SACRAMENTO .............................................................................................................................................. 12 MINNEAPOLIS .............................................................................................................................................. 14 PORTLAND .................................................................................................................................................... 16 DENVER .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Element
    NOISE ELEMENT Prepared by: Planning & Development Services County of Imperial 801 Main Street El Centro, California 92243-2875 JIM MINNICK Planning Director Approved by: Board of Supervisors October 6, 2015 NOISE ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Preface 1 B. Purpose of the Noise Element 1 C. Noise Measurement 2 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS 4 A. Preface 4 B. Noise Sources 4 C. Sensitive Receptors 13 III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 14 A. Preface 14 B. Goals and Objectives 14 C. Relationship to Other General Plan Elements 15 IV. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS AND POLICIES 17 A. Preface 17 B. Noise Impact Zones 17 C. Noise/Land Use Compatibility Standards 18 D. Programs and Policies 23 APPENDICES A. Glossary of Terms A-1 B. Airport Noise Contour Maps B-1 Planning & Development Services Noise Element Page ii (Adopted November 9, 1993 MO#18) (Revised October 6, 2015 MO#18b) LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page 1. Existing Noise Sources 5 B-1 Future Noise Contours Brawley Municipal Airport B-1 B-2 Future Noise Impact Area Calexico International Airport B-2 B-3 Future Noise Impact Area Calipatria Municipal Airport B-3 B-4 Future Noise Impact Area Imperial County Airport B-4 B-5 Future Noise Impact Area NAF El Centro B-5 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page 1. Typical Sound Levels 3 2. Existing Railroad Noise Levels 6 3. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic and Noise Data (Existing Conditions) 8 4. Imperial County Interstate and State Highway Traffic And Noise Data (Future/Year 2015 Conditions) 10 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction San Andreas Fault: an Overview
    Introduction This volume is a general geology field guide to the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area. The first section provides a brief overview of the San Andreas Fault in context to regional California geology, the Bay Area, and earthquake history with emphasis of the section of the fault that ruptured in the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. This first section also contains information useful for discussion and making field observations associated with fault- related landforms, landslides and mass-wasting features, and the plant ecology in the study region. The second section contains field trips and recommended hikes on public lands in the Santa Cruz Mountains, along the San Mateo Coast, and at Point Reyes National Seashore. These trips provide access to the San Andreas Fault and associated faults, and to significant rock exposures and landforms in the vicinity. Note that more stops are provided in each of the sections than might be possible to visit in a day. The extra material is intended to provide optional choices to visit in a region with a wealth of natural resources, and to support discussions and provide information about additional field exploration in the Santa Cruz Mountains region. An early version of the guidebook was used in conjunction with the Pacific SEPM 2004 Fall Field Trip. Selected references provide a more technical and exhaustive overview of the fault system and geology in this field area; for instance, see USGS Professional Paper 1550-E (Wells, 2004). San Andreas Fault: An Overview The catastrophe caused by the 1906 earthquake in the San Francisco region started the study of earthquakes and California geology in earnest.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2021 Regional Plan Fact Sheet
    Planning SAN DIEGO FORWARD: THE 2021 REGIONAL PLAN FACT SHEET Overview SANDAG is leading a broad-based with the goal to transform the way people community effort to develop San Diego and goods move throughout the region. Forward: The 2021 Regional Plan (2021 SANDAG is applying data-driven strategies, Regional Plan). This blueprint combines the innovative technologies, and stakeholder Topic areas that will be big-picture vision for how our region will input to create a future system that is faster, covered include: grow through 2050 and beyond with an fairer, and cleaner. implementation program to help make that » Air quality Part of this data-driven approach vision a reality. » Borders, including Baja includes the implementation of five key California, our tribal nations, The Regional Plan is updated every four transportation strategies referred to as and our neighboring counties years and combines three planning the 5 Big Moves. These strategies provide » Climate change mitigation documents that SANDAG must complete the framework for the Regional Plan and and adaptation per state and federal laws: The Regional consider policies and programs, changes in » Economic prosperity Transportation Plan, Sustainable land use and infrastructure, take advantage Communities Strategy, and Regional of our existing transportation highway » Emerging technologies Comprehensive Plan. The Regional and transit networks, and leverage trends » Energy and fuels Plan also supports other regional in technology to optimize use of the » Habitat preservation transportation planning and programming transportation system. Together, these » Healthy communities efforts, including overseeing which initiatives will create a fully integrated, projects are funded under the Regional world-class transportation system that » Open space and agriculture Transportation Improvement Program and offers efficient and equitable transportation » Public facilities the TransNet program.
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Issues and Solutions in the San Diego/Tijuana Border
    Blurred Borders: Transboundary Impacts and Solutions in the San Diego-Tijuana Region Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 4 2 Why Do We Need to Re-think the Border Now? 6 3. Re-Defining the Border 7 4. Trans-Border Residents 9 5. Trans-National Residents 12 6. San Diego-Tijuana’s Comparative Advantages and Challenges 15 7. Identifying San Diego-Tijuana's Shared Regional Assets 18 8. Trans-Boundary Issues •Regional Planning 20 •Education 23 •Health 26 •Human Services 29 •Environment 32 •Arts & Culture 35 8. Building a Common Future: Promoting Binational Civic Participation & Building Social Capital in the San Diego-Tijuana Region 38 9. Taking the First Step: A Collective Binational Call for Civic Action 42 10. San Diego-Tijuana At a Glance 43 11. Definitions 44 12. San Diego-Tijuana Regional Map Inside Back Cover Copyright 2004, International Community Foundation, All rights reserved International Community Foundation 3 Executive Summary Blurred Borders: Transboundary Impacts and Solutions in the San Diego-Tijuana Region Over the years, the border has divided the people of San Diego Blurred Borders highlights the similarities, the inter-connections County and the municipality of Tijuana over a wide range of differ- and the challenges that San Diego and Tijuana share, addressing ences attributed to language, culture, national security, public the wide range of community based issues in what has become the safety and a host of other cross border issues ranging from human largest binational metropolitan area in North America. Of particu- migration to the environment. The ‘us’ versus ‘them’ mentality has lar interest is how the proximity of the border impacts the lives and become more pervasive following the tragedy of September 11, livelihoods of poor and under-served communities in both San 2001 with San Diegans focusing greater attention on terrorism and Diego County and the municipality of Tijuana as well as what can homeland security and the need to re-think immigration policy in be done to address their growing needs.
    [Show full text]
  • All Quadrants
    City of Santa Rosa Department of Planning and Economic Development Citywide Summary of Pending Development November, 2016 This report contains a list of land use permits currently in process or approved. This is not an exhaustive list of all land use entitlements, but is limited to projects that include a minimum of five new residential units or a minimum of 5,000 s.f. of new non-residential space. This report does not contain information on subsequent project permits, such as building permits that may be in process. Please contact the listed planner for more information. Status Key: Approved - Development Entitlements have been granted. Inactive - No activity in the two years since last city staff review. In Progress - Application has been submitted, under review. All Quadrants Residential (Units) Approved In Progress Inactive Multi-Family Attached 1,394 316 121 Second Unit 26 4 0 Single-Family Detached 1,472 227 94 Total 2,892 547 215 Non - Residential (Sq. Ft.) Approved In Progress Inactive Industrial 0 130,912 0 Light Industrial 0 0 0 Office 0 0 0 Public/Institutional 0 157,018 0 Retail/Services 270,585 59,357 0 Total 270,585 347,287 0 14 ± 7 20 8 12 10 19 17 5 13 3 101 16 ¤£ 4 9 15 18 6 11 PENDING DEVELOPMENTS IN NORTHEAST SANTA ROSA Data current as of December 2016 2 1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT EACH OF THE PROJECTS SHOWN PLEASE REFER TO THE CORRESPONDING SPREADSHEET This report is available on our website www.srcity.org/departments/communitydev/planning ÃÆ12 City of Santa Rosa December, 2016 Pending Development Report This report contains a list of land use permits currently in process or approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Central, SOUTHEAST, and SOUTHWEST FRESNO and Fresno County
    UNAUTHORIZED AND UNINSURED central, SOUTHEAST, and SOUTHWEST FRESNO and FRESNo county Enrico A. Marcelli and Manuel Pastor San Diego State University and the University of Southern California Central, Southeast, and Southwest Fresno and FRESNO County Acknowledgements Why is this fact sheet important? Thanks to The California Endowment Central, Southeast, and Southwest Fresno is one of 14 sites supported by The California for funding this research and to Nexi Endowment under its Building Healthy Communities (BHC) initiative. While BHC is focused Delgado, Louisa Holmes, Rhonda on the broad social determinants of health – including improved land use, access to healthy Ortiz, Genesis Reyes, Alejandro food, and youth development – one key challenge for many residents of the BHC communities Sanchez-Lopez, and Jared Sanchez for is access to medical insurance. This is especially true for unauthorized immigrants who are their assistance in generating this explicitly excluded from the insurance exchanges and Medi-Cal insurance expansion of the fact sheet. Results were generated 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). While insurance coverage is a key issue using 2001 and 2012 Los Angeles for unauthorized immigrants, there is also evidence that maintaining a large population of County Mexican Immigrant Health uninsured residents harms others in terms of both economic and community health – thus, & Legal Status Survey (LAC-MIHLSS it matters for all Californians. II & III) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey Public Use How many unauthorized immigrants live here? Microdata Sample (ACS PUMS) data. We estimate that unauthorized immigrants represent 10 percent of Central, Southeast, and We would like to thank the Coalition Southwest Fresno’s estimated almost 100,000 residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study
    Imperial County Airport (IPL) Aeronautical and Airport Land Use Compatibility Study Study Overview Michael Baker International, Inc., was tasked by the City of El Centro, California to evaluate the proposed re-zoning of four vacant parcels within the vicinity of Imperial County Airport (IPL). As shown in the graphics throughout this study, the parcels are identified by Imperial County as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 044-620-049, 044-620-050, 044-620-051, and 044- 620-053. The parcels are located at the northwest and southwest corners of Cruickshank Drive and 8th Street and are currently zoned as Residential Airport Zone (RAP) and fall within the B2 Zone (Extended Approach/Departure Zone) of the 1996 IPL Land Use Compatibility Plan and Map. Table 1 summarizes the existing and proposed characteristics of the four parcels. Since the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) last updated the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook, the B2 Zone is no longer defined in the same manner and some zones around runways are also defined differently for Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs). Therefore, it was necessary to review existing activity data and conditions at IPL in comparison to updated Caltrans guidance to determine if the proposed parcel re-zonings would produce incompatible land uses and/or airspace impacts. Table 1 Existing and Proposed Parcel Characteristics Zoning Land Use Parcel # Acreage Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 044-620-049 2.08 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-050 1.05 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-051 17.23 RAP CG R-R GC 044-620-053 21.79 RAP ML R-R GI Source: Michael Baker International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Region of the San Andreas Fault, Western Transverse Ranges, California
    Thrust-Induced Collapse of Mountains— An Example from the “Big Bend” Region of the San Andreas Fault, Western Transverse Ranges, California By Karl S. Kellogg Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5206 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2004 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. iii Contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Geology of the Mount Pinos and Frazier Mountain Region …………………………………… 3 Fracturing of Crystalline Rocks in the Hanging Wall of Thrusts ……………………………… 5 Worldwide Examples of Gravitational Collapse ……………………………………………… 6 A Spreading Model for Mount Pinos and Frazier Mountain ………………………………… 6 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………………………………… 8 References …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Illustrations 1. Regional geologic map of the western Transverse Ranges of southern California …………………………………………………………………………… 2 2. Simplified geologic map of the Mount Pinos-Frazier Mountain region …………… 2 3. View looking southeast across the San Andreas rift valley toward Frazier Mountain …………………………………………………………………… 3 4. View to the northwest of Mount Pinos, the rift valley (Cuddy Valley) of the San Andreas fault, and the trace of the Lockwood Valley fault ……………… 3 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain Blennosperma bakeri (Sonoma sunshine) Lasthenia burkei (Burke’s goldfields) Limnanthes vinculans (Sebastopol meadowfoam) California tiger salamander Sonoma County Distinct Population Segment (Ambystoma californiense) Lasthenia burkei Blennosperma bakeri Limnanthes vinculans Jo-Ann Ordano J. E. (Jed) and Bonnie McClellan Jo-Ann Ordano © 2004 California Academy of Sciences © 1999 California Academy of Sciences © 2005 California Academy of Sciences Sonoma County California Tiger Salamander Gerald Corsi and Buff Corsi © 1999 California Academy of Sciences Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for action implementation and time of recovery are estimates and subject to change. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions, and may not represent the views or the official positions of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nehrp Final Technical Report
    NEHRP FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Grant Number: G16AP00097 Term of Award: 9/2016-9/2017, extended to 12/2017 PI: Whitney Maria Behr1 Quaternary geologic slip rates along the Agua Blanca fault: implications for hazard to southern California and northern Baja California Abstract The Agua Blanca and San Miguel-Vallecitos Faults transfer ~14% of San Andreas-related Pacific-North American dextral plate motion across the Peninsular Ranges of Baja California. The Late Quaternary slip histories for the these faults are integral to mapping how strain is transferred by the southern San Andreas fault system from the Gulf of California to the western edge of the plate boundary, but have remained inadequately constrained. We present the first quantitative geologic slip rates for the Agua Blanca Fault, which of the two fault is characterized by the most prominent tectonic geomorphologic evidence of significant Late Quaternary dextral slip. Four slip rates from three sites measured using new airborne lidar and both cosmogenic 10Be exposure and optically stimulated luminescence geochronology suggest a steady along-strike rate of ~3 mm/a over 4 time frames. Specifically, the most probable Late Quaternary slip rates for the Agua Blanca Fault are 2.8 +0.8/-0.6 mm/a since ~65.1 ka, 3.0 +1.4/-0.8 mm/a since ~21.8 ka, 3.4 +0.8/-0.6 mm/a since ~11.8 ka, and 3.0 +3.0/-1.5 mm/a since ~1.6 ka, with all uncertainties reported at 95% confidence. These rates suggest that the Agua Blanca Fault accommodates at least half of plate boundary slip across northern Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pattern of Seismicity in Southern California: the Possibility of Earthquakes Triggered by Lunar and Solar Gravitational Tides
    A Pattern of Seismicity in Southern California: The Possibility of Earthquakes Triggered by Lunar and Solar Gravitational Tides David Nabhan Helen Keller wrote that the heresy of one age is the orthodoxy of the next, giving ample proof that although sightless, she possessed extraordinary vision. Moreover, it has been said that every new fact must pass through a crucible by which first it is ignored or ridiculed, then vigorously attacked, and finally accepted as though the truth had been apparent from the beginning. Earthquake prediction is no exception but for the anomaly that the first two stages have endured far longer than what the immense populations on the U.S. West Coast might hope to expect regarding a matter so important to their safety and welfare. Residents of Southern California have been left with a bewildering set of claims and counter-claims regarding this issue for many decades. While scientific data Seismic Gap Probabilities. Author's collection. can be presented any number of ways to say any number of things, there is another arbiter that, weighed alongside the conflicting findings, may allow fair-minded observers to come to their own cogent conclusions: history. There exists a long and verifiable record of events on the Pacific Coast and elsewhere David Nabhan, SDSU alumnus, is the author of Earthquake Prediction: Answers in Plain Sight (2012) and two other books on the subject. He is directing a public opinion campaign to impel the governor of California to convene the California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council for the purposes of determining the viability or fallibility of a seismic safety plan.
    [Show full text]