The Phenomenological Ontologies of Kierkegaard and Sartre: an Existential Theory of Addiction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1994 Love and Addiction: The Phenomenological Ontologies of Kierkegaard and Sartre: An Existential Theory of Addiction Ross Channing Reed Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Reed, Ross Channing, "Love and Addiction: The Phenomenological Ontologies of Kierkegaard and Sartre: An Existential Theory of Addiction" (1994). Dissertations. 3461. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3461 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1994 Ross Channing Reed LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "LOVE" AND ADDICTION: THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES OF KIERKEGAARD AND SARTRE AN EXISTENTIAL THEORY OF ADDICTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY BY ROSS CHANNING REED CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 1994 Copyright by Ross Channing Reed, 1994 All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the following people and institutions for their support, encouragement, and prayer during the many years that led up to the production of this dissertation, as well as its actual writing: Texas A&M University Library, Millersville University Library, Franklin and Marshall College Library, Dr. John Ellsworth Winter, John Albert Cavin III, Christopher John Broniak, Richard J. Westley, John D. and Cynthia A. Cox, Brian Glenn Ressler, Jay William Rhodes, R. David Cooper, Bethany Bennett Graham, Rebecca Susan Jones, as well as my parents, Mr. and Mrs. James Rutherford Reed. And as the superstructure of it all, I thank the Great Spirit. iii As modern men, we proudly proclaim that we have been freed from the bonds of superstition that have plagued man since antiquity. This is a fallacy, however, due to the aesthetic refinement of our worship. For just as the ancient Jews, Egyptians, and Romans worshiped idols made with human hands, so we worship idols made with human minds. Truly our culture prizes above all others before it the freedom from metaphysical tutelage; but, sadly, we have not freed ourselves from any forms of superstition, but merely have become partakers in them all. We no longer have a basis to believe anything, so instead we believe nothing, which is simply a backwards way of believing anything, only we don't know it. And when a man does not know that he believes something, this does not prevent him from doing so, nor allow him to stop doing so. He becomes a slave to his nothingness. He becomes a slave to himself. Ross Channing Reed 12 July 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• iii Chapter 1. ADDICTION: DEFINITIONS AND ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS. • 7 I.11.tre>ci\lcti<>ri...................... • • • • • • • • • • . • 7 Part one. 9 Section A: A "Subjective" Definition of Addiction. 9 Section B: An "Objective" Definition of Addiction ....................... 19 Section C: Addiction and Love •••.•••.•••.....• 25 Part Two: Ontological Underpinnings Operative in the Theory of Addiction ••...••••. 27 2. SARTREAN THEORIES OF LOVE ........•••••••..••.......• 33 Introduction . .................................... 3 3 Part One: Being and Nothingness and Related Writings: The Generally Accepted View, or Sartrean Love Type One ..••• 43 Part Two: Conversion and Authenticity: An Alternate View of Love in Sartre, or Sartrean Love Type Two ••.•••••••. 75 Part Three: On the Possibility of a Synthesis of Sartrean Love Type~ One and Two .•• 88 3. AN EXISTENTIAL THEORY OF ADDICTION .•••.•••..••••.... 99 Introduction: The Culling of a Theory .••...••••.• 99 Part One: Kierkegaard and Addiction .•..•••...•.•• 102 Section A: Addiction is a Function of Missing One'sSelf ••....•••.••..••••.... 103 Section B: Addiction Involves the Sacrifice of the Real . ................... 124 Section C: Addiction Involves Freedom's Auto- iv entanglement and the Refusal to Face One's own Anxiety ••••.•..•• 13 o Section D: Addiction Involves One in the Contradictory Effort of Attempting to Absolutely Will the Finite •••••••••••..•••• 13 9 Section E: The Mutual Exclusivity of Addicted and Nonaddicted Modes of Being .. 141 Section F: Addiction is a Function of Despair, Which is a Disrelationship in One's Inmost Being ••.•••....•••• 142 Part Two: Sartre and Addiction ••••••••••••••••... 146 Section A: Addiction as a Phenomenon "Undergone" By an "Imprisoned" Consciousness: The Addict Experiences the Spontaneity that is Consciousness as "Beyond Freedom" •••.•••••.•.• 146 Section B: Addiction is a Habitual Way of Being Emotional and a Phenomenon of Belief •••••.....•. 151 Section C: Addiction is a Function of the Imagination By Way of Self induced Hypnagogic Imagery: The Quest for Simultaneous and Symbiotic Self-real-ization and Self-dereal-ization, or How Consciousness Creates for Itself Believable Belief .••••.•. 160 Section D: Addiction is a Phenomenon of Bad Faith ........................... 181 Section E: Addiction is a Basic Fear of the Human Condition: The Addict Prepares Her Own Death •.•...•••. 184 Section F: Addiction: The Illicit Illusion ..•• 191 Reed's Theory of Addiction: A Summation •••..•• 195 4. SARTRE'S THEORY OF LOVE: A THEORY OF ADDICTION •••... 200 Introduction ..................................... 200 v l?Clr"t C>11E! •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 204 Section A: The Phenomenological Reduction in SClrtrE! •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 o4 Section B: Conversion and Authenticity in Sartre ••••••••••••• .216 Part Two: Sartrean Love as an Addiction. .234 BIBLIOGRAPHY • . .. .279 VITA .••••...• . .. • 300 vi CHAPTER 1 ADDICTION: DEFINITIONS AND ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS Introduction A wise man once told me that I should write about only that which has got me by the throat. Without a doubt, the phenomenon of addiction and Sartre's notion of love are just such topics. So I am writing, so to speak, my way out of a stranglehold. Writing under such conditions, you may be sure, involves both pain and a sense of exigency, with a searing telos of truth. What I write about has been and is a matter of existence for me, and it is for this pressing and weighty reason that I could do none other than employ phenomenologi cal/existential methodology. Before giving a general overview of my methodological commitments operative within this dissertation, I feel it necessary to give a broad overview of what I seek to accom plish during the course of this work. In the present chapter, my aim is twofold: (1) To introduce the reader to the subject matter of the dissertation, and (2) To introduce the reader to the methodological underpinnings employed throughout the course of the dissertation. In chapter two, I explicate and analyze Sartre's philosophy of love. Drawing from the vast 8 gamut of his works, I show that he develops two distinct theories of love, and I raise the question concerning the compatibility of these two theories. I conclude that, given Sartre's ontology, no synthesis of the two is possible. Furthermore, I conclude that one of Sartre's theories of love is, within his own ontological framework, an unrealizable ideal. In chapter three, I wish to lay out a comprehensive theory of addiction. I shall draw upon numerous phenomenolog ical/existential texts to accomplish this aim. Primarily, I will utilize the writings of Soren Kierkegaard and Jean-Paul Sartre, but I will also employ in a tangential role the thoughts of Simone de Beauvoir, Albert Camus, the Marquis de Sade, Ortega y Gasset, and Friedrich Nietzsche. None of the latter five thinkers are necessary for the coherence and legitimation of my theory of addiction, but serve as addition al voices of wisdom, hopefully serving to further illuminate the recesses of the hidden caverns of a dark problem. The voices of de Beauvoir, Camus, Sade, Ortega, and Nietzsche shall be contained in the footnotes of the theory of addic tion. These voices embody various intra and inter-paradigma tical perspectives on the text, and proffer a meta-level of discourse. Since none of the seven thinkers represented focused on the phenomenon of addiction or offered an analysis of the issue, I must develop my own theory, utilizing the ontological tools they have provided. I have as of yet not 9 seen any thinker off er a philosophical theory of addiction, and it is for this reason as well as those stated in the opening paragraph that I have set before myself this task. Or, possibly better said, I have attended to the task that has been set before me. In chapter four, I show that Sartre's remaining theory of love, given the phenomenological/existential theory of addiction developed in chapter three, is in fact a theory of addiction. I wish to do this by way of addressing and critiquing Sartre's notions of "conversion," "authenticity," and the "phenomenological reduction." In the Sartrean world, I demonstrate, all love is but a species of covert addiction. The Sartrean cosmos, peopled with naught but bad dreams, is found to be a loveless one indeed. Part One Section A A "Subjective" "Definition" of Addiction1 1The following "subjective" "definition" of addiction is written in the first person