New Phylogenetic Analyses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Phylogenetic Analyses BS 55 479 Origins and biogeographic patterns in Ericaceae: New insights from recent phylogenetic analyses Kathleen A. Kron and James L. Luteyn Kron, KA. & Luteyn, J.L. 2005. Origins and biogeographic patterns in Ericaceae: New insights from recent phylogenetic analyses. Biol. Skr. 55: 479-500. ISSN 0366-3612. ISBN 87-7304-304-4. Ericaceae are a diverse group of woody plants that span the temperate and tropical regions of the world. Previous workers have suggested that Ericaceae originated in Gondwana, but recent phy­ logenetic studies do not support this idea. The theory of a Gondwanan origin for the group was based on the concentration of species richness in the Andes, southern Africa, and the southwest Pacific islands (most of which are thought to be of Gondwanan origin). The Andean diversity is comprised primarily of Vaccinieae with more than 800 species occurring in northern South America, Central America, and the Antilles. In the Cape Region of South Africa the genus Erica is highly diverse with over 600 species currently recognized. In the southwest Pacific islands, Vac­ cinieae and Rhodoreae are very diverse with over 290 species of Rhododendron (sect. Vireya) and approximately 500 species of Vaccinieae (I)imorphanthera, Paphia, Vaccinium). Recent phyloge­ netic studies have also shown that the Styphelioideae (formerly Epacridaceae) are included within Ericaceae, thus adding a fourth extremely diverse group (approximately 520 species) in areas considered Gondwanan in origin. Phylogenetic studies of the family on a global scale, how­ ever, have indicated that these highly diverse “Gondwanan” groups are actually derived from within Ericaceae. Both Fitch parsimony character optimization (using MacClade 4.0) and disper- sal-vicariance analysis (DIVA) indicate that Ericaceae is Laurasian in origin. Thus, previous sug­ gestions that Ericaceae are Gondwanan in origin are not supported. Separate analysis of geo­ graphic areas and phylogenetic relationships among the diverse South American Vaccinieae using dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA) indicate that dispersal has likely played a major role in the diversification of the Andean clade of Vaccinieae into Central America and the lower eleva­ tions in northern South America. Results of the analysis indicate an Andean origin for this group, which comprises most of the ericaceous species diversity described from South America. This analysis also indicates that in taxa such as Cavendishia and Satyria s.s., the Central American species are the result of relatively recent dispersal from a South American (i.e., Andean) ancestor. Kathleen A. Kron, Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27109- 7325, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] James L. Luteyn, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, 10458-5126, U.S.A. E-mail: jluteyn@nybg. org 480 BS 55 Introduction regions of the world. These concentrations of diversity occur in four major clades within Eri­ Ecologically and economically important, the caceae: Vaccinieae, Rhodoreae, Ericeae, and Ericaceae are a diverse group of woody plants Styphelioideae (Appendix 1). Vaccinieae are that can be found in a variety of habitats most diverse in the montane tropics of South throughout much of the temperate and tropi­ America and Asia. Although generic limits cal regions of the world (Appendix 1). They within Vaccinieae are poorly understood, phy­ are usually found in acid soils and are associ­ logenetic studies have shown that of the five ated with mycorrhizal fungi. In the tropics, Eri­ major clades identified in a molecular system­ caceae are most diverse in mid- to high-eleva­ atic study of the group (Kron et al. 2002b), tion montane cloud forests (Luteyn 2002), those with the largest number of species are which are also some of the most threatened tropical and occur in Gondwanan regions (e.g., ecosystems in the world (Knapp 2002). The South America, New Guinea). In the Rhodor­ most recent classification of the family (Kron et eae, Rhododendron section Vireya is the most al. 2002a) recognizes eight subfamilies and 20 species rich group within Rhododendron. Vireyas tribes. The distribution of these groups is gen­ are tropical and most diverse in New Guinea. erally cosmopolitan in scale, with concentra­ Africa, another Gondwanan region, also has tions of species diversity in the tropics, the large and morphologically diverse Erica Himalayas, Australia, and the Cape Region of (Ericeae) and one of the highest concentra­ South Africa (Fig. 1, Appendix 1). tions of species in a single genus in the world in The most recent global treatment of Eri­ the Cape Region. Lastly, Styphelioideae, which caceae biogeography is by Raven and Axelrod contain approximately 450 species are most (1974) who presented a general overview of diverse in Australia. This group was formerly the biogeography of angiosperms and sug­ thought to be distinct from Ericaceae, but gested that Ericaceae (not including Styphe- recent phylogenetic studies using molecular lioideae, then a separate family, Epacridaceae) and morphological data have shown that the likely originated in Gondwana with direct group is sister to the Vaccinioideae (Kron et al. migration from Africa to South America. They 2002a) and therefore derived from within Eri­ considered that long distance dispersal from caceae. North America in the late Miocene had added Recent phylogenetic analyses in Ericaceae to the diversity of Ericaceae in South America, have provided good resolution with strong sta­ which was already established there via the ear­ tistical support of major clades within the fam­ lier African-South American land connection. ily based on both molecular and morphologi­ The Styphelioideae (Epacridaceae) were con­ cal data. With this phylogenetic framework, sidered to be of relatively ancient descent biogeographic patterns may be analyzed with resulting from long distance dispersal between the goal of shedding some light on the origins west Gondwana and Australasia (Raven & Axel­ of the group. Here we investigate the origin rod 1974). Heads (2003) postulated a globally and biogeographic patterns of Ericaceae using widespread complex as ancestral to Ericaceae, dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA; Ronquist but his supporting argument was confined to 1997) and Fitch parsimony character optimiza­ descriptions of Malesian ericad distributions. tion using MacClade 4.0 (Maddison & Maddi­ The most species-rich groups within the Eri­ son 2000). In addition, the biogeographic caceae do indeed appear to be concentrated in areas of the Andean clade within the Vac­ what are now considered to be Gondwanan cinieae are analyzed using DIVA. BS 55 481 Enkianthoideae (1/16) Monotropoideae (15/50) Arbutoideae (4/81) Cassiopoideae 1/12) Ericoideae (19/1780) Harrimanelloideae (1/2) Vaccinioideae (45/1593) Fig. 1. World-wide distribution maps for the eight subfamilies of Ericaceae. A, Enkianthoideae. B, Monotropoideae. C, Arb­ utoideae. D, Cassiopoideae. E, Ericoideae. F, Harrimanelloideae. G, Styphelioideae. H, Vaccinioideae. 482 BS 55 Methods morphological (91 characters) data for the Eri­ caceae tree. The sampling of ericalean taxa is In addition to DIVA and Fitch parsimony char­ relatively small, but relationships in the tree acter optimization, there are several other are in general agreement with the recent study approaches to biogeographic analysis (c.g., by Anderberg et al. (2002) that used more COMPONENT; Page 1993,). We chose DIVA genes and many more taxa. For the Andean because it can be used with a single phyloge­ clade analysis we used the most recent molecu­ netic tree, rather than requiring trees from sev­ lar tree based on three chloroplast eral different groups in order to construct area genes/regions (matK, ndhF, rps4) and the cladograms. DIVA does not require any a prior nuclear internal transcribed spacer region, ITS knowledge of geologic history and does not (Powell 8c Kron 2003). All of the trees used for assume areas have a strictly divergent history biogeographic analysis exhibited moderate to (Ronquist 1997). DIVA treats areas as charac­ strong bootstrap support for most clades. Few ters (in a presence/absence format), but mini­ polytomies were present in the Ericales and mizes dispersal and extinction events relative Andean trees, and the Ericaceae tree was fully to vicariance (no cost) events in ancestral state resolved. Because DIVA requires fully resolved (?>., area) reconstruction. Therefore, DIVA trees, the Ericales tree of Kron et al. (2002a) offers the possibility of identifying potential was resolved according to the results of more vicariance events at deep branches in the tree. detailed analyses (Kron et al. 2002a; Kron However, the deepest nodes within the tree are 1997) and the Andean tree was resolved arbi­ also prone to more error (Ronquist 1997), so it trarily. The Ericales tree was modified to is important to evaluate the group of interest at include an additional taxon (i.e., Clethra more than one taxonomic scale. arborea, authors of species names are given in Fitch parsimony character optimization uses Appendices 2-4) in order to better represent areas as character states and these are mapped the geographic distribution of the Clethraceae. onto the tree using MacClade 4.0 (Maddison & The placement of C. arborea sister to C. alnifolia Maddison 2000). This provides a simple way of was based on the analysis of Anderberg et al. viewing the distribution of current taxa relative (2002) which provided better statistical sup­ to the branching patterns in the tree. However, port and resolution for nodes basal to the Eri­ Fitch parsimony optimization allows fewer pos­ caceae. Two widespread species were removed sible ancestral area reconstructions than DIVA from the Andean clade to facilitate the DIVA because only terminals can have more than analysis. one state (i.e., area). In the biogeographic analysis of Ericaceae We investigated the origin of Ericaceae using (both the Ericales tree and the Ericaceae two trees. One tree included Ericaceae and sev­ tree) different scorings of areas for DIVA and eral other members of the Ericales (APG 1998) Fitch parsimony character optimization were and the other tree included more taxa within used.
Recommended publications
  • American Medicinal Leaves and Herbs
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY—BULLETIN NO. 219. B. T. GALLOWAY, Chief of Bureau. AMERICAN MEDICINAL LEAVES AND HERBS. ALICE HENKEL, ant, Drug-Plant Investigations. Issued December 8, 191L WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1911. CONTENTS. Page. Introduction 7 Collection of leaves and herbs 7 Plants furnishing medicinal leaves and herbs 8 Sweet fern ( Comptonia peregrina) 9 Liverleaf (Hepatica hepatica and H. acuta) 10 Celandine ( Chelidonium majus) 11 Witch-hazel (Eamamelis virginiana) 12 13 American senna ( Cassia marilandica) Evening primrose (Oenothera biennis) 14 Yerba santa (Eriodictyon californicum) 15 Pipsissewa ( Chimaphila umbellata) 16 Mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) 17 Gravel plant (Epigaea repens) 18 Wintergreen (Gaultheria procumbens) 19 Bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) 20 Buckbean ( Menyanthes trifoliata) 21 Skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora) 22 Horehound ( Marrubium vu Igare) 23 Catnip (Nepeta cataria) 24 Motherwort (Leonurus cardiaca) 25 Pennyroyal (Hedeoma pulegioides) 26 Bugleweed (Lycopus virginicus) 27 Peppermint ( Mentha piperita) 28 Spearmint ( Mentha spicata) 29 Jimson weed (Datura stramonium) 30 Balmony (Chelone glabra) 31 Common speedwell ( Veronica officinalis) 32 Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea) 32 Squaw vine ( Mitchella repens) 34 Lobelia (Lobelia inflata) 35 Boneset (Eupatorium perfoliatum) 36 Gum plant (Grindelia robusta and G. squarrosa) 37 Canada fleabane (Leptilon canadense) 38 Yarrow (Achillea millefolium) 39 Tansy ( Tanacetum vulgare) 40 Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) 41 Coltsfoot ( Tussilago farfara) 42 Fireweed (Erechthites hieracifolia) 43 Blessed thistle ( Cnicus benedictus) 44 Index 45 219 5 ,. LLUSTRATIONS Page. Fig. 1. Sweet fern (Comptonia peregrina), leaves, male and female catkins 9 2. Liverleaf (Hepatica hepatica), flowering plant. 10 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Conservation Plan Outline
    Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for Endangered Sandhills Species at the Clements Property, Santa Cruz County California Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: Jodi McGraw, Ph.D. Ron and Natalie Clements Mr. Steve Henry Principal and Ecologist 8225 Ridgeview Drive Field Supervisor Jodi McGraw Consulting Ben Lomond, CA 95005 US Fish and Wildlife Service PO Box 221 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Freedom, CA 95019 Ventura, CA 93003 September 2017 HCP for the Clements Property, Ben Lomond, CA Contents Executive Summary 1 Section 1. Introduction and Background 3 Overview/Background ........................................................................ 3 Permit Holder/Permit Duration ............................................................ 3 Permit Boundary/Covered Lands ........................................................ 3 Species to be Covered by Permit ....................................................... 5 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................... 5 Federal Endangered Species Act ............................................ 5 The Section 10 Process - Habitat Conservation Plan Requirements and Guidelines ................................................. 7 National Environmental Policy Act .......................................... 8 National Historic Preservation Act ...................................................... 8 California Endangered Species Act .................................................... 8 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics, Flow-Cytometry and Pollen Storage in Erica L
    Institut für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaft und Res sourcenschutz Professur für Pflanzenzüchtung Prof. Dr. J. Léon Phylogenetics, flow-cytometry and pollen storage in Erica L. (Ericaceae). Implications for plant breeding and interspecific crosses. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Agrarwissenschaften (Dr. agr.) der Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn von Ana Laura Mugrabi de Kuppler aus Buenos Aires Institut für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaft und Res sourcenschutz Professur für Pflanzenzüchtung Prof. Dr. J. Léon Referent: Prof. Dr. Jens Léon Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Jaime Fagúndez Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Dietmar Quandt Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15.11.2013 Erscheinungsjahr: 2013 A mis flores Rolf y Florian Abstract Abstract With over 840 species Erica L. is one of the largest genera of the Ericaceae, comprising woody perennial plants that occur from Scandinavia to South Africa. According to previous studies, the northern species, present in Europe and the Mediterranean, form a paraphyletic, basal clade, and the southern species, present in South Africa, form a robust monophyletic group. In this work a molecular phylogenetic analysis from European and from Central and South African Erica species was performed using the chloroplast regions: trnL-trnL-trnF and 5´trnK-matK , as well as the nuclear DNA marker ITS, in order i) to state the monophyly of the northern and southern species, ii) to determine the phylogenetic relationships between the species and contrasting them with previous systematic research studies and iii) to compare the results provided from nuclear data and explore possible evolutionary patterns. All species were monophyletic except for the widely spread E. arborea , and E. manipuliflora . The paraphyly of the northern species was also confirmed, but three taxa from Central East Africa were polyphyletic, suggesting different episodes of colonization of this area.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Lições Das Interações Planta – Beija-Flor
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA JÉFERSON BUGONI REDES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR NOS TRÓPICOS: LIÇÕES DAS INTERAÇÕES PLANTA – BEIJA-FLOR PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS IN THE TROPICS: LESSONS FROM HUMMINGBIRD-PLANT INTERACTIONS CAMPINAS 2017 JÉFERSON BUGONI REDES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR NOS TRÓPICOS: LIÇÕES DAS INTERAÇÕES PLANTA – BEIJA-FLOR PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS IN THE TROPICS: LESSONS FROM HUMMINGBIRD-PLANT INTERACTIONS Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas como parte dos requisitos exigidos para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Ecologia. Thesis presented to the Institute of Biology of the University of Campinas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Ecology. ESTE ARQUIVO DIGITAL CORRESPONDE À VERSÃO FINAL DA TESE DEFENDIDA PELO ALUNO JÉFERSON BUGONI E ORIENTADA PELA DRA. MARLIES SAZIMA. Orientadora: MARLIES SAZIMA Co-Orientador: BO DALSGAARD CAMPINAS 2017 Campinas, 17 de fevereiro de 2017. COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA Profa. Dra. Marlies Sazima Prof. Dr. Felipe Wanderley Amorim Prof. Dr. Thomas Michael Lewinsohn Profa. Dra. Marina Wolowski Torres Prof. Dr. Vinícius Lourenço Garcia de Brito Os membros da Comissão Examinadora acima assinaram a Ata de Defesa, que se encontra no processo de vida acadêmica do aluno. DEDICATÓRIA À minha família por me ensinar o amor à natureza e a natureza do amor. Ao povo brasileiro por financiar meus estudos desde sempre, fomentando assim meus sonhos. EPÍGRAFE “Understanding patterns in terms of the processes that produce them is the essence of science […]” Levin, S.A. (1992). The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967. AGRADECIMENTOS Manifestar a gratidão às tantas pessoas que fizeram parte direta ou indiretamente do processo que culmina nesta tese não é tarefa trivial.
    [Show full text]
  • KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon
    KALMIOPSIS Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Kalmiopsis leachiana ISSN 1055-419X Volume 20, 2013 &ôùĄÿĂùñü KALMIOPSIS (irteen years, fourteen issues; that is the measure of how long Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2013 I’ve been editing Kalmiopsis. (is is longer than I’ve lived in any given house or worked for any employer. I attribute this longevity to the lack of deadlines and time clocks and the almost total freedom to create a journal that is a showcase for our state and society. (ose fourteen issues contained 60 articles, 50 book reviews, and 25 tributes to Fellows, for a total of 536 pages. I estimate about 350,000 words, an accumulation that records the stories of Oregon’s botanists, native )ora, and plant communities. No one knows how many hours, but who counts the hours for time spent doing what one enjoys? All in all, this editing gig has been quite an education for me. I can’t think of a more e*ective and enjoyable way to make new friends and learn about Oregon plants and related natural history than to edit the journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon. Now it is time for me to move on, but +rst I o*er thanks to those before me who started the journal and those who worked with me: the FEJUPSJBMCPBSENFNCFST UIFBVUIPSTXIPTIBSFEUIFJSFYQFSUJTF UIFSFWJFXFST BOEUIF4UBUF#PBSETXIPTVQQPSUFENZXPSL* especially thank those who will follow me to keep this journal &ôùĄÿĂ$JOEZ3PDIÏ 1I% in print, to whom I also o*er my +les of pending manuscripts, UIFTFSWJDFTPGBOFYQFSJFODFEQBHFTFUUFS BSFMJBCMFQSJOUFSBOE &ôùĄÿĂùñü#ÿñĂô mailing service, and the opportunity of a lifetime: editing our +ne journal, Kalmiopsis.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Classification of Groundwater-Fed
    ECOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GROUNDWATER-FED SEEPAGE WETLANDS OF THE MARYLAND COASTAL PLAIN By Jason W. Harrison Wildlife and Heritage Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources 909 Wye Mills Rd. Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 410-827-8612 ext. 109 [email protected] Wesley M. Knapp Wildlife and Heritage Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources 909 Wye Mills Rd. Wye Mills, Maryland 21679 410-827-8612 ext. 100 [email protected] June 2010 (updated February 2015) Prepared for United States Fish and Wildlife Service Lawrence J. Hogan, Jr. Governor Boyd K. Rutherford Lt. Governor Mark J. Belton Acting Secretary The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in an alternative format upon request from a qualified individual with a disability. Toll free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR ext. 3 Out of State call: 1-410-260-8540 TTY users call via the MD Relay www.dnr.maryland.gov Printed on recycled paper Citation: Harrison, J.W., W.M. Knapp. 2010. Ecological classification of groundwater-fed wetlands of the Maryland Coastal Plain. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Natural Heritage Program, Annapolis, MD. June 2010. 98 pp. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]