TIGER Discretionary Grant Application Portageville Bridge Replacement Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TIGER Discretionary Grant Application Portageville Bridge Replacement Project TIGER DISCretiONARY GRANT APPLICAtiON FOR THE POrtAgeVILLE BriDge REPLACEMENT PrOJECT “A Public-Private Partnership to Invest in Infrastructure” Submitted by: In partnership with: A PUBLIc-pRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE Linking Buffalo, Binghamton, New York City & Beyond by Rail The Honorable Ray LaHood QUICK FACTS Secretary Location: U.S. Department of Transportation n Located near the town of Portage, New York 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE n Found adjacent to Letchworth State Park Washington, DC 20590 n Milepost 366.1 on Norfolk Southern’s Southern Tier Corridor between Buffalo & Binghamton n Spans the Genesee River Southern Tier Corridor: Dear Secretary LaHood, n Bridge connects one of only two-east west rail corridors in New York State It is with much anticipation and great pleasure that I present before you the n The most direct freight rail route between New York State Department of Transportation’s TIGER V Discretionary Grant Buffalo, Binghamton and New York City n application for the Portageville Bridge Replacement Project, a proposed public- 10 short line railroads utilize bridge n Two Class I railroads utilize bridge private partnership between the State of New York, Norfolk Southern Railway n A Canada-U.S. trade corridor Company, Canadian Pacific Railway, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. New York State, as with the nation, is seeking ways to confront the dilemma Bridge Facts: of how to address its aging infrastructure, and we believe this is the type of n Single-track rail structure n public-private partnership that can help lead the way. Six towers built in 1875 n Three spans of pin-locked trusses built in 1903 n 10 spans of deck plate girders built in 1903 A pinnacle of 19th century railroad engineering, the 819-foot-long wrought n 819 feet long iron and steel viaduct referred to as the Portageville “High Iron” Bridge soars n 245 feet above the Genesee River gorge 245 feet above the Genesee River Gorge between New York’s Wyoming and Livingston counties. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the bridge helped Current Condition: n Structurally deficient & operationally obsolete to usher in an era of economic growth and prosperity for the burgeoning n Weight restriction of 273,000 lbs per rail car, manufacturing communities it was designed to serve, including Binghamton, below industry standard 286,000 lbs Buffalo and New York. Acting as the linchpin for the Erie Railroad’s east-west n Speed restriction of 10 mph instead route, the bridge connected then-fledgling areas with direct and efficient of 35 mph n freight rail access to national and international markets, providing what Emergency Closure & Repairs on 9/9/2009 n Park patrons frequently trespass on bridge was, at the time, the equivalent of an interstate highway super-corridor. Coupled with the New York Central Railroad Water Level Route and the Proposed Project Cost-Share: Pennsylvania Railroad’s Pennsylvania Route, the Erie Railroad’s Southern Tier n $17,000,000 TIGER Discretionary Grant Route, anchored by the Portageville Bridge, gave communities the freight n $46,200,000 NS & CP n access and volume necessary to accommodate and sustain precipitous $5,500,000 NYSDOT economic and population growth unrivaled anywhere in the world at the turn Project Improvements: of the 20th century. n Improves rail service to and from Canada n Removes weight restriction for the entire One hundred years later, transportation planners, freight railroads, and even Southern Tier corridor n casual observers conclude that the bridge is deteriorating from corrosion Preserves a lifeline for 10 short line railroads n Enhances service reliability for trains routed to and fatigue. It now has been deemed structurally deficient and operationally Pan Am Southern in Upstate New York obsolete. Symptoms of a larger problem led by worsening structural and New England conditions, the Portageville Bridge is approaching the end of its useful design n Sustains new intermodal service soon to be life as a rail freight carrying structure. While engineers cannot say precisely launched between Buffalo and the Port of NY when the bridge will need to be taken permanently out of service, they do & NJ along the Southern Tier n Keeps the Southern Tier Corridor intact openly concede that the clock is ticking. Benefit-Cost Ratios: n 12.2 assuming a 3% discounting n 6.3 assuming a 7% discounting A PUBLIc-pRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE Linking Buffalo, Binghamton, New York City & Beyond by Rail As recently as September 9, 2009, after structural cracks and broken rivets were discovered, an emergency inspection and subsequent repairs took the bridge out of commission for three days. Ripple effects of the three-day shutdown demonstrated the loss of the bridge was more than a modest inconvenience. Among the disruptions to commerce were five-hour delays in Norfolk Southern train schedules and substantial operational deficiencies that negatively impacted customers served by the Southern Tier route. The shutdown raised serious concerns from many rail customers, carriers, and transportation planners that depend on this structure to remain competitive not only along this corridor, but to support investments and activities throughout the Disruption to this vital North American freight rail network. Naturally, the Portageville Bridge and the Southern Tier route’s uncertain future stymies economic development and freight economic route is of rail growth opportunities predicated on its continued preservation. particular concern The replacement of the bridge will achieve positive economic impacts. A 2012 because of the growing Benefit-Cost/Economic Impact Analysis by Cambridge Systematics analyzing the importance the railroads period between 2013 and 2042 determined the following benefits in New York State if the bridge is replaced: have recently placed in (1) Freight shipper costs savings of $211 million the corridor. (2) Total transportation benefits of $689 million (3) Benefit-cost ratio for the State (discounted 4%) of 9.6 (4) Business output from construction of $89 million (5) Business output from operations of $447 million These numbers demonstrate that the replacement bridge would enhance New York State’s competitiveness and grow our economy. (A full copy of this report can be found in Appendix 14.2.) A further Economic Analysis that complies with the guidelines set forth by the U.S. Department of Transportation can be found in Appendix 14.1. Ultimately, as the benefit- cost analysis demonstrates, even a temporary routing disruption of freight rail over the Southern Tier will result in considerable public and private costs such that some businesses that ship by rail will close entirely because they no longer remain competitive. Other businesses will transition a percentage (or all) of their shipping to trucks to meet their logistics needs while other businesses will continue to move by rail, albeit with higher transportation costs and along other railroad routes. Among the other impacts are those to businesses that may desire to expand or initiate new freight rail industrial development activities, but will be forced to scale back, delay or even eliminate those plans entirely due to operational inefficiencies associated with a less-than-adequate bridge. Disruption to this vital economic route is of particular concern because of the growing importance the railroads have recently placed in the corridor. The Southern Tier route has new and potentially growing significance as Norfolk Southern, Canadian Pacific and 10 short line railroads view it a central part of their business strategies to meet the nation’s freight transportation needs. A PUBLIc-pRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE Linking Buffalo, Binghamton, New York City & Beyond by Rail Led by the recent advent of commercially viable natural resource extraction methods, the railroads along the Southern Tier have all witnessed, seemingly overnight, a spike in demand for freight rail transport. In many instances, regional carload traffic from 2009 to 2010 has jumped more than 1,000 percent, reinvigorating many former rail yards and rail-served industrial facilities that had been sitting idle for decades. This demand is expected to grow as more companies locate within the region to help meet the nation’s energy needs. Coupled with the exponential growth in regional industrial carload consumption is growth in intermodal traffic over the Southern Tier. Today, approximately half of the Southern Tier’s train start composition is intermodal, accommodating market lanes between Chicago and New England, between Canada and the East Coast, and – if the uncertainty over the bridge’s future is soon resolved -- a new service between Buffalo and the Port of New York/New Jersey. The time-sensitive nature of intermodal shipments means that in traffic the rail segment is susceptible to conversion back to long-distance trucks if the Southern Tier route is severed. In recent years, Based on investment trends from major U.S. railroads, such as the new intermodal the Portageville facility constructed by Norfolk Southern in Mechanicville, New York, and on-dock rail Bridge’s importance investments made by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the Southern Tier is expected to grow for regional, national and international intermodal train movements to New York State’s — provided the Portageville Bridge is replaced soon. transportation Despite the Portageville Bridge’s glaring operational challenges, which include network has reached speed and weight restrictions along with significant maintenance and inspection new heights with requirements, it remains the integral link for New York State’s Southern Tier route. In recent years, the Portageville Bridge’s importance to New York State’s transportation significant growth in network has reached new heights with significant growth in both local and pass- both local and pass- through rail traffic. At a time when significant freight rail investments and industrial development projects in New York and other parts of the nation are predicated on the through rail traffic.
Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • NYSDOT "Rail Program-Report 1985"
    ~.. ~~\ . , t····_, & NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT ·1985 . Prepared by the Rail Division November 1985 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARIO M. CUOMO, Governor FRANKLIN E. WHITE, Commissioner NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT 1985 Prepared in compliance with the rules and regulations for the: State Rail Pian, per Section 5 (j) of the Department of Transportation Act; and Annual Report to the State legislature, per Chapter 257, Section 8, of the Laws of 1975 and Chapter 369, Section 2 of the laws of 1979. TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE INTRODUCTION iv CHAPTER 1: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL PROGRAM 1 A. PROGRAM ELEMENTS 1 B. ACHIEVEMENTS 3 CHAPTER 2: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL POLICY 6 A. AUTHORITY 6 B. POLICY 6 C. PLANNING PROCESS 9 CHAPTER 3: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM 12 A. NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL FREIGHT SYSTEM 12 B. INTERCITY RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE 13 CHAPTER 4: RAIL ISSUES 18 CHAPTER 5: PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 29 A. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS 29 B. CURRENT PROGRAM OF RAIL PROJECTS 30 C. PROJECTS UNDER REVIEW FOR FUTURE FUNDING 33 MAP 1 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL/HIGm~AY SYSTEM M.l MAP 2 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM M.2 APPENDIX I - PROJECTS COMPLETED UNDER NEW YORK STATE'S Al.1 RAIL PROGRAM A. 1974 BOND ISSUE Al.1 B. 1979 BOND ISSUE A1.3 C. FEDERAL LOCAL RAIL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM A1.4 D. STATE RAILASSISTANCE PROGRAM Al.5 E. RAILROAD BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Al.6 APPENDIX II - RAIL ABANDONMENTS A2.1 A. RAIL LINES ABANDONED DURING 1983-84 WITH NO A2.1 CONTINUATION OF SERVICE B.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 NYS Rail Map.Pdf
    C P T X to ] S K C to Montreal T ] ] S M T X N A S / St. Lambert, QUE Montreal [ [C RR K N M F T Montreal, QUE N ii a g a rr a O C Mechanicville S Huntingdon C M T S Hoffmans P ] A T [C Central Station [ /S Mechanicville [NS P N] Lockport P P SXT [C C ] Rooseveltown C East Alburg NIAGARA Lockport C C Rouses Point S N T Fort Covington T SX R C X E X FALLS T C T ] R S /NS S TK/CP C C [AM RotterdamC S M XT X S a r a t o g a CS S T S a r a t o g a Rouses Point CN] X [A CSXT [ Jct. M ] ] T S T Massena K T K Helena S ] T T Mohawk Niagara Falls N S ] M / A S [ P Yard N T L Plattsburgh P V Yard C / R / X C CSX K C T K T NorfolN k S T M Y C P M A O [ C A Port Kent [ SCHENECTADY G C A N A D A North Tonawanda South P T C YOG C l i n t o n X Schenectady Port of N Norwood C l i n t o n S Plattsburgh C Martinsville Ogdensburg XT Carman CP [NS] CS Westport R C T Cohoes X E S N North C Port Henry Bluff Point C A N A D A Tonawanda S c h e n e c tt a d y VT Yard C F r a n k l i n S C Ticonderoga T F r a n k l i n S X X X Toronto, ONT S T T C [A Rutland CR M Watervliet NE Essex Jct.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Railroad Contacts
    Appendix 10.4 - LIST OF RAILROAD CONTACTS RAILROAD (abbr.) ADDRESS PHONE NO. / E-Mail Adirondack Scenic Railway 315-724-0700 Adirondack Railway (ADRC) Preservation Society Note: NYSDOT owns the Remsen- Mr. William Branson, President Lake Placid Travel Corridor and Union Station leases it to ARPS who operates it as 321 Main Street ADRC. Utica, NY 13501 Albany Port Railroad Mr. Richard Stack, General (518)463-8679 Corporation (APRR) Manager [email protected] Port of Albany 101 Raft Street Albany, NY 12202 Amtrak (AMTK) See National Railroad Passenger Corporation Arcade and Attica Railroad Mr. George Ling, General (585) 492-3100 Corporation (ARA) Manager 278 Main Street Arcade, NY 14009 Mr. Ray Martel, General B & H Rail Corporation (BH) (585) 384-9169 Manager [email protected] 5769 Sweeteners Blvd Note: BH and WHYP are affiliates of Lakeville, NY 14480 LAL. Batten Kill Railroad Company, Mr. William Taber, President (518) 692-2160 Inc. (BKRR). 1 Elbow Street [email protected] Greenwich, NY 12834 Boston and Maine See Pan Am Railways Corporation (BM) Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, See Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. (BPRR) Incorporated Buffalo Southern Railway Mr. Albert Feasley, 716-992-4979 (BSOR) 8600 Depot Street [email protected] Eden, NY 14057 Canadian National Railway Ms. Karen Phillips, VP- 202-347-7816 (CN) Government Affairs [email protected] 601 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 500 North Building Washington, DC 20004 Canadian Pacific Railway See Delaware & Hudson (CP) Railway Catskill Mountain Railroad Mr. Harry Jameson 845-688-5553 Company, Inc. CMRR PO Box 404 [email protected] Phoenicia, NY 12464 Central New York Railroad See New York, Susquehanna & Corporation (CNYK) Western Railway Corporation Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad See Vermont Railway Systems Company (CLP) Consolidated Rail Corporation Government Relations 215-209-5025 (CSAO) 1717 Arch Street, Suite 3210 Note: Conrail Shared Assets Philadelphia, PA 19103 Organization is owned by CSXT and NS and is operated as a switching railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • PC*MILER Geocode Files Reference Guide | Page 1 File Usage Restrictions All Geocode Files Are Copyrighted Works of ALK Technologies, Inc
    Reference Guide | Beta v10.3.0 | Revision 1​ .​ 0 ​ Copyrights You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright © 1986-2017 ALK Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ALK Data © 2017 – All Rights Reserved. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. PC*MILER®, CoPilot® Truck™, ALK®, RouteSync®, and TripDirect® are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. IBM is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation. Xceed Toolkit and AvalonDock Libraries Copyright © 1994-2016 Xceed Software Inc., all rights reserved. The Software is protected by Canadian and United States copyright laws, international treaties and other applicable national or international laws. Satellite Imagery © DigitalGlobe, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Weather data provided by Environment Canada (EC), U.S. National Weather Service (NWS), U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and AerisWeather. © Copyright 2017. All Rights Reserved. Traffic information provided by INRIX © 2017. All rights reserved by INRIX, Inc. Standard Point Location Codes (SPLC) data used in PC*MILER products is owned, maintained and copyrighted by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. Statistics Canada Postal Code™ Conversion File which is based on data licensed from Canada Post Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Line Railcar Storage Locations
    Short Line Car Storage Directory State Short Short Line Name Contact Name E-Mail Phone Car Hazmat Hazmat TIH/PIH TIH/PIH Restrictions Line Spots Loads Residue Loads Residue SCAC (Max) (empty but not cleaned) AL RJAL RJ Corman Childersburg Adam Boyles [email protected] 859 314-0891 42 YES YES YES YES AL SQSC Sequatchie Valley Railroad Byron Clinton [email protected] 931 580-7375 750 YES YES NO YES AL ATN Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC Chris Richter [email protected] 920 209-0118 260 YES YES NO NO AL TASD Terminal Railway, Alabama State Docks Cliff Melton [email protected] 251 408-7077 100 NO NO NO NO AL AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 130 NO YES NO NO AL CAGY Columbus & Greenville Railway Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 440 YES YES NO NO AL COEH Conecuh Valley Railroad Co., Inc. Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 300 NO YES NO NO AL MNBR Meridian & Bigbee Railroad Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 240 NO YES NO NO AL TNHR Three Notch Railroad Co. Inc. Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 30 YES YES NO NO AL WGCR Wiregrass Central Railroad Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 100 NO YES NO NO AL EARY Eastern Alabama Railway Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 135 NO YES NO NO AL ALAB Alabama Railroad Co. Nathan Johns [email protected] 309 605-0119 300 YES YES NO NO 263k restriction AL ALE Alabama Export Railroad Meaghan Davis [email protected] 228 474-0711 80 NO NO NO NO CT CNZR Central New England Railroad Deb Belliveau [email protected] 860 666-1030 88 NO NO NO NO 263k restriction CT CSO Connecticut Southern Railroad Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 150 NO NO NO NO 263k restriction, Plate F CT NECR New England Central Railroad Kevin Phillips [email protected] 904 562-0692 400 NO NO NO NO CT HRRC Housatonic Railroad Co., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions and Procedures Manual
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety • HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSING INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS AND PROCEDURES MANUAL December 1996 REGISTRATION FORM Please register my name as a holder of the "Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory - Instructions and Procedures Manual. " By returning this Registration Form, I will receive all future revisions to this manual. (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT) NAME RAILROAD/STATE AGENCY DEPT./UNIT/BUREAU ADDRESS P.O. BOX CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE NO. (Area Code) Please complete and return this form to: Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety (RRS-23) Highway-Rail Crossing and Trespasser Programs Division 400 7th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSING INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS AND PROCEDURES MANUAL for the Federal Railroad Administration Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory Data Maintenance Program December 1996 prepared for: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Highway-Rail Crossing and Trespasser Programs Division 400 Seventh St. S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 by: AMB Associates, Inc. 818 Roeder Road, Suite 500 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 lNSTRUCflONS AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Page ii National Highway-Rail Crossing Inventory Instructions and Procedures Manual FRA CoNfENI'S INSTRUCI10NS AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose ........................................... 1-1 1.2 Goal ............................................. 1-1 1.3 Project History . 1-1 1.4 Data Files ......................................... 1-3 1.5 Definitions of Highway-Rail Intersections ...................... 1-4 2.0 HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSING INVENTORY NUMBER ................. 2-1 2.1 Background ........................................ 2-1 2.2 Uniqueness and Calculation ............................... 2-2 2. 3 Assignment of Numbers . 2-5 2.4 Number Boards ...................................... 2-7 2.4.1 Specifications ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Association of American Railroads
    ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS July 26, 2020 Mr. James A. Mullen Acting Administrator Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 RE: Exemption Request from 49 C.F.R. § 395.3 - Railroad Maintenance-of-Way Drivers Responding to Unplanned Events Dear Acting Administrator Mullen: The Association of American Railroads (AAR) and American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA) (the Associations), on behalf of themselves and their member railroads, request that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) grant an exemption under 49 C.F.R. § 381.300 et seq. from the FMCSA hours of service (HOS) operation restrictions at 49 C.F.R. § 395.3(a)-(b).1 The railroads request that this exemption be granted for five years as prescribed in § 381.300(b). This request covers approximately 20,000 individual drivers and 11,000 commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). As background, the Associations submitted a similar exemption request from § 395.3 requirements on October 11, 2018, at Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0367, requesting relief from FMCSA HOS restrictions for railroad Maintenance-of-way (MOW) employees responding to unplanned events (Attachment 1). On February 21, 2020, the Associations withdrew that pending request (Attachment 2). This revised exemption request addresses the same topic as the Associations’ October 2018 petition, but requests a narrower exemption which parallels that recently granted by FMCSA to other railroad industry groups at Docket No. FMCSA-2019- 1 AAR is a trade association whose membership includes freight railroads that operate 83% of the line-haul mileage, employ 95% of the workers, and account for 97% of the freight revenues of all railroads in the United States; and passenger railroads that operate intercity passenger trains and provide commuter rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in New York Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................41 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................3,687 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................2,645 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$125,240 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................20,600 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$525 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 3.7 million additional trucks to handle the 66.7 million tons of freight that moved by rail in New York in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 10.4 million Total Carloads: 201,000 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Waste and Scrap 3.7 39,900 Nonmetallic Minerals 2.1 20,500 Chemicals
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario County Freight Corridor Development Plan and GEIS
    ONTARIO COUNTY FREIGHT CORRIDOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT | SEPTEMBER 2018 Prepared for Ontario County Planning Department Prepared by: With support from: Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement Ontario County Freight Corridor Development Plan Town of Manchester, Town of Farmington, Village of Manchester, Village of Shortsville & Village of Clifton Springs Ontario County, New York Lead Agency: Town of Manchester 1272 County Road #7 Clifton Springs, New York 14432 Prepared By: Fisher Associates 135 Calkins Road Suite 100 Rochester, New York 14623 Date DGEIS Accepted by Lead Agency: March 13, 2018 Date of Public Hearing: April 10, 2018 Closing Date of Comment Period: June 18, 2018 Date FGEIS Accepted by Lead Agency: September 11, 2018 ______________ Financial assistance for the preparation of this report was provided by the Federal Highway Administration through the Genesee Transportation Council. The project sponsor is solely responsible for its content and the views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. GTC’s Commitment to the Public The Genesee Transportation Council assures that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, disability, age, gender, or income status, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. GTC further assures every effort will be made to ensure non-discrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. En Español El Consejo Genesee del Transporte asegura completa implementación del Título VI de la Ley de Derechos Civiles de 1964, que prohibe la discriminación por motivo de raza, color de piel, origen nacional edad, género, discapacidad, o estado de ingresos, en la provisión de beneficios y servicios que sean resultado de programas y actividades que reciban asistencia financiera federal.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 21: Allowable Railcar Clearances in New York State
    C P T X to ] S K C T ] Montreal to ] S M T ! X N ! A S / Montreal [ [C RR K N M F T N ii a g a rr a O C Mechanicville S Huntingdon C ! M T S Hoffmans P ] A T [ ! [ /S Mechanicville C [NS P N] Lockport P P XT [C C ] CS ! C Rooseveltown ! East Alburg NIAGARA Lockport ! C Rouses Point ! S N T Fort Covington T SX R C X E X FALLS T C T ] ! R S /NS S TK/CP C C [AM RotterdamC S M ! XT X S a r a t o g a CS S T S a r a t o g a ! CN] X [A CSXT [ ! Jct. M ] ] T S T Massena K T K Helena S ] ! T T Mohawk Niagara Falls N S ] M / A S [ P Yard N T L P V Yard C / I / Legend-Allowable Railcar Clearances R X C CSX K C T K T NorfolN k S T ! M Y C P M A O [ C A [ SCHENECTADY G North Tonawanda South P ! T C YOG C l i n t o n X ! Schenectady Plate "H" Loaded Double Stack 20'-3" Port of N Norwood C l i n t o n S ! C ! !Plattsburgh Martinsville T Carman Ogdensburg T SX ! R X CP [NS] C S Cohoes C C E ! N North Bluff Point ! Plate "J" Enclosed Multilevels 19'-0" C A N A D A Tonawanda S c h e n e c tt a d y Yard C F r a n k l i n S C T F r a n k l i n S X X X S T T C [A CR M Watervliet TOFC/CPR EXPRESSWAY 17'-3" NE Essex Jct.
    [Show full text]
  • PC*MILER|Rail User's Guide
    Rail User Guide www.pcmiler.com pcmiler.com/support ALL RIGHTS RESERVED You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. PC*MILER, CoPilot, ALK and RouteSync are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright 2016 Railinc Corporation. All Rights Reserved. The Centralized Station Master, Junction-Interchange Master and Mark/SCAC Register appearing in this publication may not be reproduced without express permission from Railinc. Contains information licensed under the Open Government License – Canada. Geographic feature POI data compiled by the U.S. Geological Survey. Cartographic data provided by multiple sources including lnstituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia, U.S. Geological Survey, Natural Earth and © Department of Natural Resources Canada. All rights reserved. Source of map data for Mexico provided by lnstituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia. ALK Data © 2016 – All Rights Reserved. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. Copyright 1989-2016 ALK Technologies, Inc. 1 Independence
    [Show full text]