CROSSRAIL - the Tunnel Joining London East & West

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CROSSRAIL - the tunnel joining London east & west Spatial Planning Seminar Michael Hebbert TUDelft January 28th 2016 Bartlett School of Planning seminar topic : Europe’s largest current urban infrastructure project seminar objective : to consider the planning history of the Crossrail project and its significance for London’s spatial planning Martin Mogridge & John B Parr ‘Metropolis or Region – on the development and structure of London’ Regional Studies 1997 Bartholomew Street Plan of London circa 1890 County of London Plan, Social & Functional Analysis 1943 London Travel Survey: Weekday Travel Flows by Public Transport 1954 London Travel Survey: Weekday Travel Flows by Car 1954 Social Atlas of London: council housing 1974 Social Atlas of London: educational attainment 1974 Social Atlas of London: social class (% intermediate & junior non-manual) 1974 Social Atlas of London: Labour vote in 1971 elections 1974 London – More By Fortune than Design 1997 Metropolitan Police Public Carriage Office Blue Book 1991 Metropolitan Police Public Carriage Office Blue Book 1991 Unemployment 1981: H Clout & P Wood London Problems of Change 1991 Greater London Development Plan 1984 E14 landscape of dereliction 1984 Michael von Clemm, originator of Canary Wharf project 1984 Stratford’s Olympic site under construction 2011 Tube advertisement, Kabbee minicabs 2014 London Underground Network 1933 London Underground Network 1999 TfL Rail Transport Network 2015 TfL Rail Transport Network including Crossrail 2019 Stepney Green Cavern 2013 London Railways, circa1860 André Derain, Victoria Embankment, 1906 Forshaw & Abercrombie County of London Plan, 1943 Report of the Railway (London Plan) Committee, 1949 ‘Plan G’, London Transportation Study, 1968 GLC London Rail Study 1974, and BR Cross-London Rail Links 1980 LPAC Capital Investment in Londons Railways (1989) DoT (1989) Central London Rail Study CrossRail Bill 1993-1994 London’s Millenium Inauguration of Mayor of London and Greater London Assembly City Hall 2000 launch of CLRL partnership 2003 Mayor’s Plan for London 2004 and 2009 inauguration of Crossrail construction phase 2009 Financial crisis and General Election – Crossrail in jeopardy again 2010 project mid-point February 2014 The tunnel linking East and West on schedule for completion 2018 Museum of London Docklands Adam Dent’s Journey to the Heart of East London 2014 Paris RER Ligne A 1976 London Crossrail 2018 the TUDelft dimension ! Meccanoo at Thamesmead London Crossrail 2018 [email protected] .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Abercrombie's Green-Wedge Vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944
Abercrombie’s green-wedge vision for London: the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944 Abstract This paper analyses the role that the green wedges idea played in the main official reconstruction plans for London, namely the County of London Plan 1943 and the Greater London Plan 1944. Green wedges were theorised in the first decade of the twentieth century and discussed in multifaceted ways up to the end of the Second World War. Despite having been prominent in many plans for London, they have been largely overlooked in planning history. This paper argues that green wedges were instrumental in these plans to the formulation of a more modern, sociable, healthier and greener peacetime London. Keywords: Green wedges, green belt, reconstruction, London, planning Introduction Green wedges have been theorised as an essential part of planning debates since the beginning of the twentieth century. Their prominent position in texts and plans rivalled that of the green belt, despite the comparatively disproportionate attention given to the latter by planning historians (see, for example, Purdom, 1945, 151; Freestone, 2003, 67–98; Ward, 2002, 172; Sutcliffe, 1981a; Amati and Yokohari, 1997, 311–37). From the mid-nineteenth century, the provision of green spaces became a fundamental aspect of modern town planning (Dümpelmann, 2005, 75; Dal Co, 1980, 141–293). In this context, the green wedges idea emerged as a solution to the need to provide open spaces for growing urban areas, as well as to establish a direct 1 connection to the countryside for inner city dwellers. Green wedges would also funnel fresh air, greenery and sunlight into the urban core.
[Show full text]
The Post-War Reconstruction Planning of London: a Wider Perspective
Centre for Environment and Society Research Working Paper series no. 8 The post-war reconstruction planning of London: a wider perspective Peter J Larkham and David Adams The post-war reconstruction planning of London: a wider perspective Peter J Larkham Professor of Planning and David Adams Lecturer in Planning Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University Working Paper Series, no. 8 2011 ISBN 978-1-904839-54-5 © Authors, 2011 Published by Birmingham City University Centre for Environment and Society Research Faculty of Technology, Engineering and the Environment City Centre campus, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK iii CONTENTS Abstract v Acknowledgements v Introduction 1 The context of regional-scale planning 4 The hierarchy of planning for London 6 A hierarchy of planning 6 Greater London Plan 7 MARS 10 RIBA London Regional Reconstruction Committee plan 12 “A plan for ‘Greater London” 13 County of London Plan 14 City of London plans (1) Improvements and Town Planning Committee 17 City of London plans (2): Holden and Holford 20 City of London plans (3) Royal Academy 22 City of London plans (4) Less formal 27 Borough-level plans 29 Overview: planners and planning 31 Conclusions 33 Status of competing plans 34 Material and non-material considerations 35 Scale of activity 36 Implementation: the future 37 References 39 Bibliography and resources 46 iv Illustrations, Tables and Text Boxes Figure 1: Schematic representation of clustering of London-related Planning activity 3 Figure 2: The MARS plan 11 Figure 3: The Trystan Edwards / Hundred New Towns Association plan 14 Figure 4: Map of social and functional areas (the “egg diagram”) 16 Figure 5: North part of ring road looking south, J.D.M.
[Show full text]
UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE)
UK Jubilee Line Extension (JLE) - 1 - This report was compiled by the OMEGA Centre, University College London. Please Note: This Project Profile has been prepared as part of the ongoing OMEGA Centre of Excellence work on Mega Urban Transport Projects. The information presented in the Profile is essentially a 'work in progress' and will be updated/amended as necessary as work proceeds. Readers are therefore advised to periodically check for any updates or revisions. The Centre and its collaborators/partners have obtained data from sources believed to be reliable and have made every reasonable effort to ensure its accuracy. However, the Centre and its collaborators/partners cannot assume responsibility for errors and omissions in the data nor in the documentation accompanying them. - 2 - CONTENTS A INTRODUCTION Type of Project Location Major Associated Developments Current Status B BACKGROUND TO PROJECT Principal Project Objectives Key Enabling Mechanisms and Timeline of Key Decisions Principal Organisations Involved • Central Government Bodies/Departments • Local Government • London Underground Limited • Olympia & York • The coordinating group • Contractors Planning and Environmental Regime • The JLE Planning Regime • The Environmental Statement • Project Environmental Policy & the Environmental Management System (EMS) • Archaeological Impact Assessment • Public Consultation • Ecological Mitigation • Regeneration Land Acquisition C PRINCIPAL PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Route Description Main Termini and Intermediate Stations • Westminster
[Show full text]
A Brief History of London Transport V1
London Transport A brief history London Transport A brief history Sim Harris First published 2011 by Railhub Publications Dunstable, Bedfordshire www.railhub2.co.uk © Sim Harris 2011 The moral right of Sim Harris to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, circulated or exploited in any way whatsoever without the written permission of the copyright holder, with the exception of excerpts published for the purposes of review or brief quotations, in connection with which this work shall be cited unambiguously as the true source. ISBN awaited This digital edition designed and created by the Railhub studio Contents 1 ‘Sensational plan’ 11 2 ‘Serious doubts’ 23 3 ‘Fares fair’ 31 Chronology 40 Notes on sources 41 8 9 LONDON TRANSPORT Daily Express 3 December 1929, reporting the announcement of a new Passenger Board for London, and the new LPTB logo, which was soon replaced by the classic ‘bullseye’ 10 Chapter One ‘Sensational plan’ T caused by unrestricted competition by bus operators on the streets of London had become extreme by the early 1920s, when ‘pirate’ buses concentrated on peak hour flows, causing traffic disruption and neglecting passengers at quieter times. Their presence led to calls for controls, which were largely achieved by the London Traffic Act in 1924. This allowed the authorities to ‘designate’ streets and so restrict the routes available to the pirates. But further reforms were urged, particularly by Labour politi- cians, and in December 1929 the Minister of Transport Herbert Morrison published the Labour government’s proposed London Pas- senger Transport Bill.
[Show full text]
City in the West City in the West
CITY IN THE WEST CITY IN THE WEST 210,000 homes Enfield 310,000 jobs 600,000 Londoners Barnet Harrow Haringey Waltham Redbridge Forest Havering Brent Barking & Hackney Camden Islington Dagenham The purpose of maps or plans, is to tell us The need to provide homes, particularly Greenford Newham Tower Hamlets where we are in relation to other things and around increasingly accessible stations, which Hillingdon Ealing Westminster how to get from where we are to where we in many outer London areas are associated K&C want to go. with industrial and employment uses creates Southwark a land use allocation challenge. This should be H&F Greenwich Hounslow City in the West, as City in the East, sets out capable of intelligent resolution. This plan sets Lambeth Lewisham Bexley to do that. Like City in the East the story of out to establish that you can have your cake Wandsworth Richmond upon west London owes much to its history with and eat it. That it is possible for a carefully Thames many of the outer London boroughs having considered plan to accommodate significant Wimbledon been outside the London County Council, the housing growth whilst providing land for Kingston Abercrombie plan and having an identity more the employment, logistics and commercial upon Merton Thames associated with the counties such as Surrey activities that keep London ticking and help Bromley rather than the city. As London’s population create a sense of place. Sutton and infrastructure grow that relationship will Croydon London Cancer change. Crossrail 2, Thameslink, the Bakerloo The largest concentration and growth of jobs Hub line extension and the metroisation of railway will continue to remain within the Central lines along with a shift in the way and in the Activities Zone, the west end, City of London locations in which people work are driving that and Canary Wharf.
[Show full text]
Urban Design Group URBAN Annual Conference DESIGN a Vision for London? QUARTERLY Issue 31 June 1989 £3.00 CONTENTS Issue 31 June 1989
Proceedings of the 1988 Urban Design Group URBAN Annual Conference DESIGN A Vision for London? QUARTERLY Issue 31 June 1989 £3.00 CONTENTS Issue 31 June 1989 The Proceedings of the Urban Design Group Annual Conference held on 12th and 13th December 1988 at The Building Centre London MATERIAL FOR PUBLICATION OR REVIEW SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: Foreword 2 Introduction 2 by Kathy Stansfield The Editor A Vision of Chaos URBAN DESIGN QUARTERLY by Bob Jarvis 26 Park Road The Journey to Docklands 4 Abingdon by Barry Shaw OXON 0X14 IDS A Review of the Past 7 by Ted Hollamby Tel: Work 0908 692 692 The County of London Vision 11 Home 0235 26094 by Arthur Ling The First Real Move to a Planning of London 17 GENERAL ENQUIRIES TO: by Hermione Hobhouse THE URBAN DESIGN GROUP The Urban Imagination of the Attlee Years 22 by John Gold c/o Arnold Linden A Review of the Present 26 Chairman by Geoff Holland 17 Hatton Street The City of London World Financial Centre 30 London by Peter Wynne Rees NW8 8PL Planning Prospects 32 by Robin Clement Tel: 01 723 7772 Design Prospects 35 by Nigel Coates ALL MEMBERSHIP ENQUIRIES AND Workshop on Aesthetics 37 NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS TO: Summarised by Lawrence Revill Ruth Schamroth Contributions by Richard MacCormac and Peter Low Workshop on Employment 37 1 Harley Road Summarised by Ian Bentley London Contributions by Sidney Sporle and John Worthington NW3 3BX Workshop on Development 38 Summarised by Arnold Linden TREASURER Contribution by David Gosling An Overview 40 Ann Dunton by Francis Tibbalds 13 Garthorne Road Post Script 45 Forest Hill 1988 Kevin Lynch Memorial Lecture given by London Sir Roy Strong.
[Show full text]
Politics, Planning and Homes in a World City
Politics, Planning and Homes in a World City This is an insightful study of spatial planning and housing strategy in London, focusing on the period 2000–2008 and the mayoralty of Ken Livingstone. Duncan Bowie presents a detailed analysis of the development of Livingstone’s policies and their consequences. Examining the theory and practice of spatial planning at a metropolitan level, Bowie explores the relationships between: • planning, the residential development market and affordable housing; • environmental, economic and equity objectives; • national, regional and local planning agencies and their policies. The book places Livingstone’s mayoralty within its historical context and looks forward to the different challenges faced by Livingstone’s successors in a radically changed political and economic climate. Clear and engaging, this critical analysis provides a valuable resource for academics and their students as well as planning, housing and development professionals. It is essential reading for anyone interested in politics and social change in a leading ‘world city’ and provides a base for parallel studies of other major metropolitan regions. Duncan Bowie is Reader in Urban Planning and Regeneration at London Metropolitan University. He has worked in London for thirty years as a professional housing strategist and planner, most recently developing the housing policies for the Mayor’s London Plan and also as analyst of its implementation. UNCORRECED SECOND PROOFS Housing, Planning and Design Series Editors: Nick Gallent and Mark Tewdwr-Jones UCL Bartlett School of Planning This series of books explores the interface between housing policy and practice, and spatial planning, including the role of planning in supporting housing policies in the countryside, the pivotal role that planning plays in raising housing supply, affordability and quality, and the link between planning/housing policies and broader areas of concern including homelessness, the use of private dwellings, regeneration, market renewal and environmental impact.
[Show full text]
London's Image and Identity Revisiting London’S Cherished Views
London's Image and Identity Revisiting London’s Cherished Views Introduction London’s captivating blend of geology, topography and townscape, set in a natural bowl shaped by the Thames, has created many cherished, sweeping views. Generations of Londoners, tourists, writers and artists have admired, painted, engraved and penned poetic verses about the ever-changing prospects from the Thames and its banks, and the dramatic panoramas from the surrounding hills. The identity of the city, and its global brand, is wrapped up in these views and the landmark buildings that punctuate them: the Palace of Westminster, St Paul’s Cathedral, the Tower of London and the Royal Hospital Greenwich. The international significance of these places is well recognised, with three of these sites inscribed on UNESCO’s list of World Heritage Sites. London’s views have also been protected and shaped by building and planning controls since such regulations were first devised. Recognising the increasing and inherent public value of views, planning policies have evolved for over 80 years to ensure that the public can continue to appreciate these much-loved prospects and the insight they give to the city, its development and us as Londoners. More recently, this value has been recognised by the Secretary of State, who set height limits in parts of the capital, creating viewing corridors which are shaping the design of individual buildings and, in turn, city districts. Responsibility for the views policy now lies with the Greater London Authority and the London Boroughs. Historic England is a consultee on many planning applications affecting views, and a key stakeholder in discussions about views because of their own extraordinary historic value, as well as their intrinsic links to some of London’s most significant heritage assets.
[Show full text]
St Mary's and Morris Walk Areas
CHAPTER 6 St Mary’s and Morris Walk Areas This chapter covers the areas that lie inland from the for- is a good example of board school architecture. Robert mer naval dockyard. The land here billows across gently Pearsall’s fire station of1886 –7 is another notable survival. rising hills, its slopes now unified by twentieth-century Around these institutions the housing stock deterio- social housing. A history of that housing is preceded here rated, and slum conditions spread. The present character by accounts of the area’s first phases of speculative devel- of the area is largely due to the formation of the St Mary’s opment, largely late-Georgian in date, and of its numer- Comprehensive Development Area in 1951. There were ous institutional buildings, mainly churches and schools, important preliminaries on the Rectory Estate in the 1930s, mostly built during the Victorian era. The territory cov- when the Ecclesiastical Commissioners began an ambitious ered is bounded to the north by the grounds of the par- rebuilding project. But post-war redevelopment was initi- ish church of St Mary and Woolwich Church Street (Ill. ated by Woolwich Borough Council, a formidable house- 280). It extends as far south as the west end of Wellington building authority. This was the only project of its kind and Street, to the east across John Wilson Street and to the date in London overseen by a borough rather than by the west, straddling Frances Street, as far as the Morris Walk London County Council. Within twenty years the area’s Estate, which spills across the parish boundary.
[Show full text]
Central London Is the Greatest Challenge Within Rivers and the Sea
Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 Reverie 4 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 6 ALGG Framework Plan 6 ALGG Area Frameworks 7 ALGG Governance 8 Area Strategy 10 Area Description 14 Strategic Context 16 Vision 18 Objectives 20 Opportunities 22 Project Identification 24 Clusters 26 Projects Map 28 Key Prjojects 30 Project Details 82 Forward Strategy 84 Gap Analysis 86 Forward Strategy 88 Appendices 90 Baseline Description 92 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA12 Links 94 Project Identification 112 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA12 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: River Thames from Wapping foreshore Foreword The All London Green Grid is this most visionary plan And what is the Green Grid? It is not just green, for for London in decades and could have a legacy as a start.
[Show full text]
Cite Oct 2016 Web.Pdf
CITY IN THE EAST CITY IN THE EAST 260,000 homes Enfield 360,000 jobs Barnet 625,000 Londoners Harrow Haringey Waltham Redbridge In mid-2000 Richard Rogers, who lead the Forest Mayor’s Architecture and Urbanism Unit, felt Havering Brent that what was needed in the Thames Gateway so wasn’t founded in the statutory planning Barking & Hackney was a big idea, to capture the imagination, system it was looking to challenge. Which Camden Islington Dagenham something that seemed to be absent from the meant it couldn’t influence development. It was Greenford Newham Tower Hamlets debate about its future. This resulted in City also in its own way like the borough plans a Hillingdon Ealing Westminster East, a plan for the Royal Docks that radically world of its own, rather than a part of the wider K&C changed its land use. Gone was the Victorian city. Southwark Tate and Lyle syrup and canning factory, the Ten years later London’s growth is driving H&F Greenwich Hounslow meat rendering plant and City Airport (to allow a renewed interest in the east, and the Lambeth Lewisham Bexley greater building heights). The Royals was potential exists to plan for it as part of the Wandsworth re-imagined as a city in its own right. A plan city rather than apart from the city. This Richmond upon Thames that at the time was not a million miles from plan is necessary to efficiently manage the Wimbledon the plans that developers like Ballymore, who allocation of commercial, industrial, retail and Kingston had purchased extensive riverside sites had housing land across the wider east of London upon Merton Thames commissioned for themselves.
[Show full text]
The Use of Transit Investment and Congestion Pricing to Influence Travel and Location Decisions in London
The Adaptable City: The Use of Transit Investment and Congestion Pricing to Influence Travel and Location Decisions in London by Andrea Lynn Broaddus A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning and the Designated Emphasis in Global Metropolitan Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Elizabeth Deakin, Chair Professor Daniel Chatman Professor Robert Cervero Professor Joan Walker Fall 2015 The Adaptable City: The Use of Transit Investment and Congestion Pricing to Influence Travel and Location Decisions in London Copyright 2015 By Andrea Lynn Broaddus ABSTRACT The Adaptable City: The Use of Transit Investment and Congestion Pricing to Influence Travel and Location Decisions in London by Andrea Lynn Broaddus Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Elizabeth Deakin, Chair This dissertation investigates two key transportation policies influencing travel behavior and location decisions in London towards sustainability: bus priority and congestion charging. Traffic congestion is a problem faced by cities worldwide, imposing time delays on travelers and decreasing economic efficiency. Congestion is increasing as cities are successful at attracting population and employment growth. This increasing urban density increases competition for urban road space, resulting in traffic congestion and forcing prioritization among road users. At the same time, sustainability goals increasingly set reduction targets for vehicle miles travelled (VMT). Transportation policy must both reduce congestion and VMT, while maintaining a fair distribution of costs and benefits among residents. London has navigated these challenges through pairing bus priority as a ‘carrot’ and congestion charging as a ‘stick’ policy.
[Show full text]