International Olympic Committee Disciplinary Commission Decision Regarding Artur Taymazov Born on 20 July 1979, Uzbekistan Federation, Athlete, Wrestling
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
ITA-LD-LRT II-2721549 INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DECISION REGARDING ARTUR TAYMAZOV BORN ON 20 JULY 1979, UZBEKISTAN FEDERATION, ATHLETE, WRESTLING In application of the Olympic Charter and, in particular, Rule 59.2.1 thereof, and the IOC Anti- Doping Rules applicable to the Games of the XXX Olympiad, London 2012 (the “Rules”) and, in particular, Articles 1,2, 6.3.3, 7, 8, and 9 thereof: I. FACTS A. 2008 Olympic Games 1. Artur TAYMAZOV (the “Athlete”), participated in the Games of the XXIX Olympiad, Beijing 2008 (the “2008 Olympic Games”) as a member of the National Olympic Committee of Uzbekistan. 2. On 21 August 2008, the Athlete competed in the Men’s freestyle 120kg Wrestling event (Qualifications and Finals) in which he ranked 1st and was awarded the gold medal. 3. On 21 August 2008, the Athlete was requested to provide a rune sample for doping control. Such sample was identified with the number 1846495. 4. The A-Sample 1846495 was analysed during the 2008 Olympic Games by the WADA- accredited laboratory in Beijing. Such analysis did not result in an adverse analytical finding at that time. 5. After the conclusion of the 2008 Olympic Games, all the samples collected upon the occasion of the 2008 Olympic Games were transferred to the WADA-accredited Laboratory in Lausanne, Switzerland (the “Laboratory”) for long-term storage. 6. In 2016, the IOC conducted a re-analysis of the Athlete’s sample 1846495. The re- analysis returned a positive for the presence of two Prohibited Substances, dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (also known as turinabol) and stanozolol. 7. Following the re-analysis procedure conducted in 2016 of the Athlete’s sample 1846495, the IOC Disciplinary Commission held on 31 March 2017 that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to the IOC Anti-Doping Rules applicable to the 2008 Olympic Games (presence and/or use, of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an athlete’s bodily specimen). The Athlete’s results at the 2008 Olympic Games were disqualified and his gold medal withdrawn. 8. The Athlete appealed the IOC Disciplinary Commission to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) in Lausanne, Switzerland. CAS dismissed the Athlete’s appeal and upheld the decision of the IOC Disciplinary Commission. 1 ITA-LD-LRT II-2721549 B. 2012 Olympic Games 9. The Athlete participated in the Games of the XXX Olympiad, London 2012 (the “2012 Olympic Games”) as a member of the National Olympic Committee of Uzbekistan. 10. On the 11 August 2012, the Athlete competed in the Men’s freestyle 120kg Wrestling event (Qualifications and Finals) in which he ranked 1st and was awarded the gold medal. 11. On 11 August 2012, the Athlete was requested to provide a urine sample for a doping control. Such sample was identified with the number 2721549. 12. The A-Sample 2721549 was analysed during the 2012 Olympic Games by the WADA- accredited Laboratory in London. The analysis did not result in an adverse analytical finding at that time. 13. After the conclusion of the 2012 Olympic Games, all the samples collected upon the occasion of the 2012 Olympic Games were transferred to the Laboratory in Lausanne, Switzerland for long-term storage. 14. The IOC decided to perform further analyses on samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games. These additional analyses were notably conducted with improved analytical methods in order to possibly detect Prohibited Substances which could not be identified by the analysis performed at the time of the 2012 Olympic Games. 15. The IOC decided that the re-analysis process would be conducted as a regular A and B sample analysis, without resorting to a splitting of the B-Sample. 16. The remains of the A-Sample were analysed by the Laboratory and resulted in an Adverse Analytical Finding (“AAF”) as it showed the presence of Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone metabolites, a Prohibited Substance (Class S1.1a – Anabolic Androgenic Steroids). 17. The results were reported to the IOC in accordance with Art. 6.2.1 of the Rules. 18. Further to the verifications set forth in Art. 6.2.2 of the Rules and in application of Art. 6.2.3 of the Rules, the IOC President, Mr Thomas Bach, was informed of the existence of the AAF and the essential details available concerning the case. 19. Pursuant to Art. 7.2.4 of the Rules, the IOC President set up a Disciplinary Commission, consisting in this case of: - Prof. Denis Oswald, Chairman; - Mrs. Gunilla Lindberg; and - Mr. Juan Antonio Samaranch. 20. The IOC has delegated the implementation of the Doping Control program for the 2012 Olympic Games to the International Testing Agency (the “ITA”). Such delegation includes the conduct of re-analysis of the samples collected during the 2012 Olympic Games and the related results management. 2 ITA-LD-LRT II-2721549 21. On 17 December 2018, the ITA notified the Athlete, through the National Olympic Committee of Uzbekistan (the “NOC”), of the above-mentioned AAF and of the institution of disciplinary proceedings to be conducted by the Disciplinary Commission. By means of an Athlete Rights Form to be completed by the Athlete, the ITA informed the Athlete of his right to request the opening and analysis of the B-Sample and to attend this process, either in person and/or through a representative, and of his right to request a copy of the laboratory documentation package. 22. The Athlete was also given the possibility to refer the matter for adjudication before the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland, by means of an arbitration agreement. 23. On 17 December 2018, the ITA also notified United World Wrestling (the “UWW”) and the NOC of the above. 24. On 11 January 2019, the ITA sent a reminder to the NOC to confirm receipt of the AAF, and that the Athlete had been notified. The ITA reminded the NOC that pursuant to Art. 6.3.3 of the Rules, notice to an athlete is deemed to be accomplished by delivery of such notice to the NOC and, accordingly, it is the duty of the NOC to notify the athlete. 25. On 11 January 2019, the NOC confirmed receipt of the AAF to the ITA. 26. On 14 January 2019, the NOC informed the ITA that the Athlete was since September 2012 no longer a member of the Uzbekistan wrestling team as he had become a Russian citizen, and was not in a position to contact the Athlete. 27. On 15 January 2019, the ITA reiterated to the NOC that the Athlete was a member of the NOC’s team during the 2012 Olympic Games and that, pursuant to Art. 6.3.3 of the Rules, notice to the Athlete was deemed accomplished by delivery to the NOC. Therefore, the NOC was requested to notify the Athlete through any and all contact information available to the NOC. 28. On 18 January 2019, the NOC sent the notification of the AAF to the Athlete via email. 29. On 25 January 2019, the ITA also sent the notification of the AAF to the Athlete via email. 30. On 25 January 2019, the Athlete confirmed receipt of the AAF notification and inquired as to the status of the proceedings. 31. On 25 January 2019, the ITA clarified for the Athlete that he was required to provide his response to the Athlete Rights Form and the proposed arbitration agreement. The Athlete was given a deadline of 8 February 2019 to provide his response. 32. On 8 February 2019, the Athlete responded to the ITA through legal counsel (law firm Motieka Audzevicius in Vilnius, Lithuania). The Athlete completed the Athlete Rights Form, indicating that he did not accept the AAF. The Athlete requested the opening and analysis of the B-Sample, and a copy of the A-Sample laboratory documentation package. He would not personally attend the opening and analysis of the B-Sample, but would be assisted by his legal counsel. 3 ITA-LD-LRT II-2721549 33. On 12 February 2019, the ITA confirmed receipt of the Athlete Rights Form and provided the Athlete with the A-Sample laboratory documentation package. 34. On 13 February 2019, the ITA informed the Athlete and his counsel that the B-Sample opening would take place on 27 February 2019 at the Lausanne Laboratory. 35. On 13 February 2019, the ITA also informed the NOC and UWW of the scheduled B- Sample opening and inquired as to whether a representative would be present to attend. 36. On 13 February 2019, UWW informed the ITA that no representative would attend the B-Sample opening. The NOC did not respond to the ITA. 37. On 19 February 2019, the Athlete’s counsel informed the ITA that he would attend the opening, aliquoting, and resealing of the B-Sample. 38. On 27 February 2019, the B-Sample was opened in the presence of the Athlete’s counsel, and subsequently analysed. 39. On 1 March 2019, the ITA provided the B-Sample analysis report to the Athlete. The B-Sample confirmed the results of the A-Sample, showing the presence of Dehydrochlormethyltestosterone metabolites. The Athlete was asked to request a copy of the B-Sample laboratory documentation package by 6 March 2019. The Athlete was also asked to indicate his desired dispute resolution forum by 11 March 2019. 40. On 1 March 2019, the Athlete requested the B-Sample laboratory documentation package. 41. On 11 March 2019, having not yet received the B-Sample laboratory documentation package, the Athlete requested an extension of 1 week after receipt of such.