AGENDA

BOARD OF DIRECTORS ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

DISTRICT’S ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708

REGULAR MEETING

November 19, 2003 – 7:00 P.M.

Agenda Posting: In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the District’s Administrative offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Secretary.

Items Not Posted: In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Board for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2(b) as an emergency item or because there is a need to take immediate action, which need came to the attention of the Board subsequent to the posting of agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted in the manner as above, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Accommodations for the Disabled: The Board of Directors Meeting Room is wheelchair accessible. If you require any special disability related accommodations, please contact the Orange County Sanitation District Board Secretary’s office at (714) 593-7130 at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested.

Items Continued: Items may be continued from this meeting without further notice to a Committee or Board meeting held within five (5) days of this meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(3).

Meeting Adjournment: This meeting may be adjourned to a later time and items of business from this agenda may be considered at the later meeting by Order of Adjournment and Notice in accordance with Government Code Section 54955 (posted within 24 hours).

1. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance (Director Jim Silva)

2. Roll Call

3. Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)

4. Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary

5. Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Board on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to three minutes.

Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Board of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 11/19/03 Page 2

6. The Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors.

a. Report of Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards b. Report of General Manager c. Report of General Counsel

7. If no corrections or amendments are made, the minutes for the regular meeting held on October 22, 2003 will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair.

8. Ratifying payment of claims of the District, by roll call vote, as follows:

ALL DISTRICTS 10/15/03 10/31/03 Totals $11,112,700.19 $11,370,272.71

DIRECTORS: Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving OCSD. This requires that you identify the contributor by name. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party. For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with OCSD. For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director’s Handbook or call the office of General Counsel.

CONSENT CALENDAR

All matters placed on the Consent Calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the Consent Calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the Consent Calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business.

Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar shall, upon recognition by the Chair, state their name, address and designate by number the item to be removed from the Consent Calendar.

The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the Consent Calendar.

9. Consideration of motion to approve all agenda items appearing on the Consent Calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:

11/19/03 Page 3

a. (1) Receive and file petition from Bill Tovatt requesting to annex 1.02 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and,

(2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-25, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-33 – Tovatt Annexation).

b. (1) Receive and file petition from Ken Kirkland requesting to annex 0.31 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) in the vicinity of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and,

(2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-26, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-35 – Kirkland Annexation).

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

10. Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any.

COMMITTEE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS

11. STEERING COMMITTEE

Consent Calendar

a. Order draft Steering Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 22, 2003 to be filed.

Non-Consent Calendar

b. Review and consideration of agenda items considered by the Steering Committee re the November 19, 2003 meeting.

c. Consideration of items deleted from Steering Committee Consent Calendar, if any.

12. OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (OMTS)

OMTS Consent Calendar

a. Order draft Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 5, 2003 to be filed.

b. Receive and file Final Report for Corrosion Management Assessment Study, Specification No. CS-2002-80-BD, dated September 2003, prepared by M.J. Schiff & Associates, Inc.

11/19/03 Page 4

OMTS Non-Consent Calendar

c. Consideration of items deleted from OMTS Committee Consent Calendar, if any.

13. PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE (PDC)

PDC Consent Calendar

a. Order draft Planning, Design and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 6, 2003 to be filed.

b. (1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation of 36-inch Forcemain (B) Between Bitter Point Pump Station and Junction Box, Contract No. 5-29-R1, with Insituform Technologies, Inc., authorizing a deduction of $15,529, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,536,941; and,

(2) Accept Contract No. 5-29-R1 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.

c. Ratify Change Order No. 10 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $56,041, increasing the total contract amount to $71,198,134.

d. Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $197,094, increasing the total contract amount to $14,731,356.

e. (1) Approve a budget Amendment of $4,222,000 for Long Term Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, for a project budget of $7,074,000; and,

(2) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for additional flow monitoring and analysis for an additional amount of $125,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,337,400.

f. Approve Amendment No. 1, to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for Ellis Avenue Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. I-10, providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of $400,055, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,586,082.

g. Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, providing for additional engineering services during construction, for an additional amount of $78,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $440,979.

h. Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for additional construction support services for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for an additional amount of $1,776,417, increasing the total amount not to exceed to $6,164,240.

11/19/03 Page 5

PDC Non-Consent Calendar

i. Consideration of items deleted from PDC Committee Consent Calendar, if any

14. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE (FAHR)

FAHR Consent Calendar

a. Order draft Finance, Administration and Human Resources Committee Minutes for the meeting held on November 12, 2003 to be filed. (Minutes to be distributed at 11/19/02 Board Meeting.)

b. Receive and file Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2003.

c. Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003.

d. Receive and file the 2003-04 First Quarter Financial Report for the period ending September 30, 2003.

e. Approve SAFETY-POL 113 - Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program, as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program Policy.

f. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-27, Authorizing the Director of Human Resources to Appoint or Employ Agents or Advisors to Implement and Administer District’s Deferred Compensation Plan Loan Program.

g. Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-28, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for:

1. Create the Automotive/Heavy Equipment Assistant classification at pay range 53 ($16.772 - $20.965); and,

2. Delete the Lead Collection Facilities Worker classification at pay grade 66 ($23.123 - $28.904).

h. Approve the reclassifications of eight District employees, the upgrading of one vacant position and an equity adjustment for one employee.

i. Receive, file and approve the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2003, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants.

j. Authorize staff to invest the Debt Service Reserve Fund for the 2003 Certificates of Participation through a competitive selection process to be conducted by the District’s Financial Advisor, Public Resources Advisory Group, in accordance with the District’s Investment Policy.

11/19/03 Page 6

k. (1) Approve two additional vanpool routes for the Rideshare Program utilizing existing vans; and,

(2) Approve implementation of rideshare incentives in an effort to comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202 and meet established Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) targeted goal, at the Board’s discretion and subject to change by the Board at any time.

FAHR Non-Consent Calendar

l. Consideration of items deleted from FAHR Consent Calendar, if any.

15. JOINT GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM COOPERATIVE COMMITTEE (JCC)

JCC Consent Calendar

a. Order Joint Groundwater Replenishment System Cooperative Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 13, 2003 to be filed.

b. Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Colich Construction LP, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Unit II Pipeline Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, for an amount not to exceed $16,084,005, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of $8,042,003.

JCC Non-Consent Calendar

c. Consideration of items deleted from JCC Consent Calendar, if any.

NON-CONSENT CALENDAR

16. Closed Session

CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Board, the Chair may convene the Board in closed session to consider matters of pending real estate negotiations, pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.8, 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6, as noted.

Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employment actions or negotiations with employee representatives; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Board during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as the Board takes final action on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.

a. Convene in closed session, if necessary

11/19/03 Page 7

1. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, and Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel, re Meet and Confer Update re Orange County Employees Association (Government Code Section 54957.6).

2. Confer with Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources, and Steve Filarsky, Special Labor Counsel, re Meet and Confer Update re Supervisor and Professional Management Team Group (Government Code Section 54957.6).

b. Reconvene in regular session

c. Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session

17. Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report.

18. Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any

19. Future Meeting Date: The next Board of Directors regular meeting is scheduled for December 17, 2003, at 7:00 p.m.

20. Adjournments

NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors, items shall be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than the close of business 14 days preceding the Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications.

General Manager Blake Anderson (714) 593-7110 [email protected] Board Secretary Penny Kyle (714) 593-7130 [email protected] Director/Engineering David Ludwin (714) 593-7300 [email protected] Director/Finance/Treasurer Gary Streed (714) 593-7550 [email protected] Director/Human Resources Lisa Tomko (714) 593-7145 [email protected] Director/Information Technology Patrick Miles (714) 593-7280 [email protected] Director/Operations & Maintenance Bob Ooten (714) 593-7020 [email protected] Director/Technical Services Bob Ghirelli (714) 593-7400 [email protected] Communications Services Mgr. Carol Beekman (714) 593-7120 [email protected] General Counsel Thomas L. Woodruff (714) 564-2605 [email protected]

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agendas\2003 Board Agendas\111903 agenda.doc

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT 8 Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Lenora Crane, Executive Assistant

SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Ratify Payment of Claims of the District by Roll Call Vote.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTIFICATION

Pursuant to Government Code Section 84308, you are required to disclose any campaign contribution greater than $250 received in the past twelve months from any party to a contract involving the Orange County Sanitation District. Further, you may not participate in the decision making process to award a contract to such party.

For reference, you are directed to the Register of Warrants as to all current contractors/vendors with the District.

In general, you must disclose the basis of the conflict by identifying the name of the firm or individual who was the contributor.

For the specifics of Government Code Section 84308, please see your Director’s Handbook or call the office of General Counsel.

SUMMARY

See attached listing.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Copies of Claims Paid reports from 10/01/03 – 10/15/03 and 10/16/03 – 10/31/03

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 8.ClaimsPaid.doc

Revised: 06/04/03 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable - Warrants 56276 Carollo Engineers$ 41,029.46 Professional Services - Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study 56277 Orange County Sanitation District 800,510.69 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 56278 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 68,249.00 Engineering Service - Sewer Repair 56279 Perona, Langer, Beck, Lallande & Serbin 65,000.00 Claim Settlement - Personnel Issue 56280 Southern California Edison 115,378.33 Power 56281 Southern California Edison 85,870.37 Power 56282 UBS Financial Services, Inc. 39,172.19 Remarking Fees - Series 2000A Certificates of Participation 56283 UC Regents 30,000.00 Membership - Coastal Water Research & Modeling Project 56284 Airgas Safety, Inc. 4,572.74 Safety Supplies & Equipment 56285 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 121.04 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56286 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 166.72 Telephone Service 56287 AT & T Wireless Services - Airtime 4,122.58 Cellular Phone Service 56288 Carollo Engineers 1,753.50 Professional Services - Rate Fee Study 56289 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 56290 County Wholesale Electric Co. 163.50 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56291 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 56292 Dulgarian, Dick 2,107.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56293 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,898.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 56294 Environmental Management Consulting 3,915.00 Prof. Serv. - Data Analysis & Reporting & Ventilation Measurement for Belt Press Bldg. 56295 Court Order 525.00 Wage Garnishment 56296 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 56297 FLW, Inc. 509.44 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56298 Government Finance Officers Association 50.00 Publication 56299 City of Huntington Beach 30.00 Water Use 56300 Industrial Metal Supply 580.73 Metal 56301 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 56302 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 3,731.22 Dues Deduction 56303 Irvine Ranch Water District 76.50 Water Use 56304 Living Leadership 1,323.00 Mechanical Maintenance Training Registration 56305 Maintenance Technology Corp. 343.10 Mechanical Supplies 56306 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,658.22 Mechanical Parts, Tools & Supplies 56307 National Bond & Trust 2,045.44 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 56308 Nextel Communications 4,540.04 Cellular Phones & Air Time 56309 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 496.10 Lab Parts & Supplies 56310 OCEA 552.36 Dues Deduction 56311 Pacific Industrial Supply 126.15 Instrument Parts & Supplies 56312 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 56313 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 56314 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,530.00 Dues Deduction 56315 PenValve 437.01 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56316 Posner, Allen 6,176.70 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56317 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 7,975.00 Construction - Emergency Lining of Failed 8" VCP Lining 56318 City of Seal Beach Finance Dept. 177.76 Water Use 56319 James W. Silva 789.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56320 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 56321 Southern California Edison Co. 14,298.91 Construction - Relocation of Edison Line - Garden Grove 56322 Summit Steel 1,131.36 Metal 56323 SBC 1,278.66 Telephone Services 56324 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 5,262.97 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56325 Lisa L. Tomko 666.01 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 1 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56326 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 56327 Verizon California 635.55 Telephone Services 56328 Voided Check - - 56329 Nicholas J. Arhontes 417.31 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56330 Michael A. Berdis 313.83 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56331 Thomas M. Blanda 863.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56332 James A. Carter 147.84 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56333 William D. Cassidy 100.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56334 Ronald C. Cortez 523.36 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56335 Allan P. Dumlao 629.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56336 James M. Elo 320.25 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56337 Tim H. Hopkins 34.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56338 Chandra R. Johannesson 275.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56339 Dean R. Karels 31.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56340 Selwyn D. Mansell 378.66 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56341 Michael N. Morey 280.80 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56342 Peter M. Morrison 541.61 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56343 Samuel L. Mowbray 809.37 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56344 James C. Mullins 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56345 Umesh N. Murthy 150.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56346 Edmund L. Pendleton 82.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56347 Rodney K. Petersen 304.91 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56348 William F. Pierce 393.16 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56349 Jeffrey T. Reed 943.28 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56350 Henry R. Salgado 616.11 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56351 Curt V. Shelp 281.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56352 Jean E. Tappan 118.62 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56353 Charles F. Winsor 170.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56354 County of Orange - Auditor Controller 720.00 Maint. Agreement - Repair/Installation of Base, Handheld & Vehicle Radios 56355 Crane, Lenora 1,671.80 Employee Computer Loan Program 56356 Luna, Lourdes 2,091.79 Employee Computer Loan Program 56357 WEFTEC 100.00 Project Management Office Meeting Registration 56358 ADS Environmental Services, Inc. 64,243.47 Professional Services J-73-2 56359 Black & Veatch Corporation 326,504.46 Engineering Services P1-76, J-71-3 & P2-85 56360 Blue Cross of California 650,452.92 Medical Insurance Premium 56361 California Soil Products 48,325.29 Biosolids Disposal 56362 Carollo Engineers 47,321.39 Professional Services - Coordinated Commercial Enterprise Study 56363 Carollo Engineers 523,873.90 Professional Services - Microfiltration Demonstration Project & P2-66 56364 Delta Dental 55,474.96 Dental Insurance Plan 56365 Fluor Enterprises, Inc. 56,125.29 Engineering Services J-84 56366 Hill Brothers 49,579.68 Chemicals - Odor & Corrosion Control - Newport Trunkline 56367 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 54,799.21 Constr. - Gas Flap/Vari. Loc.; Install Concrete Box, Manhole Cover Repair; Junction Box Investigation 56368 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan 50,801.76 Medical Insurance Premium 56369 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. 55,824.38 Professional Services I-10 & J-79 56370 Mooring Systems, Inc. 41,678.00 (4) Trawl Resistant Bottom Mounts & Edge Tech Deck Unit 56371 Orange County Water District 60,783.42 GAP Water Use MO 10-23-96 56372 RBF Consulting 30,028.10 Engineering Services 2-24-1 56373 Science Applications Intl., Corp. 54,032.92 Professional Services - Ocean Monitoring P-179 & P-185 56374 Southern California Material Handling 32,960.60 (1) Pneumatic Tire Forklift 56375 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 155,498.53 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 56376 U.S. Metro Group, Inc. 26,235.00 Janitorial & Floor Maintenance at Plants 1 & 2 56377 Waste Markets 99,943.22 Maint. Agreement - Grit & Screenings Removal & Digester Bed Mat'l. Removal

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 2 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56378 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart 112,565.75 Legal Services MO 7-26-95 56379 ARB, Inc. 1,113,237.18 Construction 11-22 56380 Cora Constructors 456,120.00 Construction 7-7-2 56381 Steve P Rados, Inc. 741,690.90 Construction I-2-4 56382 Union Bank of California 82,410.10 Construction I-2-4, Retention 56383 Kienow Associates, Inc. 27,451.51 Litigation Services - Bushard Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 56384 A & G Industries 858.39 Stainless Steel Wash Boxes 56385 A Tint of Glass 368.00 Window Tinting 56386 Abatix Environmental Corp. 220.89 Hardware 56387 Adamson Industries 257.95 Lab Parts & Supplies 56388 Advanced Engine Technology Corporation 3,774.67 Engine Parts & Supplies 56389 Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1,347.76 Lab Parts & Supplies 56390 Airborne Express 75.64 Air Freight 56391 Airgas Safety, Inc. 959.86 Safety Supplies & Equipment 56392 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 1,963.14 Mechanical Supplies 56393 Alta-Robbins, Inc. 53.50 Instrument Supplies 56394 Aluminum Precision 588.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56395 American Industrial Supply, Inc. 685.58 Insecticide 56396 American Machinery & Blade, Inc. 2,347.46 Professional Services - Asbestos Study 56397 Archie Ivy, Inc. 2,835.00 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56398 Atlantis Pool Care 750.00 Service Agreement - Admin. Bldg. Atrium 56399 Awards & Trophies Company 26.27 Plaques 56400 ABB Automation, Inc. 775.24 Flow Meter Repairs 56401 AMSA 695.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 56402 Robicon Corporation 519.83 Prof. Serv. - Programming & Complete Start-Up of Robicon Drives 56403 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 82.46 Telephone Service 56404 AT&T Wireless - TITAN 676.76 Cellular Phone Equipment & Accessories 56405 AT&T Wireless Services 3,066.75 Wireless Phone Services 56406 Baker Tanks 3,136.00 Tank Rentals 56407 Battery Specialties 608.23 Batteries 56408 Ben Meadows Company, Inc. 19.84 Lab Supplies 56409 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 1,078.86 Lab Supplies 56410 BioSpherical Instruments, Inc. 172.69 Instrument Maint. 56411 Brown & Caldwell 200.00 Notices & Ads 56412 Bush & Associates, Inc. 1,260.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 56413 BC Wire Rope & Rigging 597.32 Rigging Devices & Certification 56414 California Auto Collision 1,396.59 Vehicle Repairs - V-328 56415 California Relocation Services, Inc. 1,357.51 Moving/Relocation Services 56416 California State University Institute 11,404.50 Ocean Monitoring Vessel Support 56417 Caltrol, Inc. 4,123.32 Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance 56418 CalCOFI 300.00 Compliance Training Registration 56419 Cell2Cell 484.90 Cellular Phone Equipment & Accessories 56420 Center for Creative Growth 4,600.00 Professional Services - O & M Executive & Management Coaching 56421 Certified Truck Bodies 10,193.37 Installation of Generator on Truck Bed & Misc. Parts - V-527 56422 Charles P. Crowley Co. 140.96 Instrument Parts 56423 Clickguard Corporation 222.75 Printer Service Agreement 56424 Coast Fire Equipment 1,363.56 Fire Extinguishers 56425 Coast Rubber Stamp, Mfg. 77.58 Stationery & Office Supplies 56426 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 850.00 Analysis of Industrial Wastewater, Wastewater & Biosolids 56427 Communications Supply Corp. 243.95 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56428 Compressor Components of California 3,744.00 Coil Cleaning & Testing & Compressor Parts 56429 Computer Sciences Corp. 10,756.61 Consulting & Lab Services- Assay Pilot Project

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 3 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56430 Con-Way Western Express 282.52 Freight 56431 Consolidated Elect. Distributors 3,789.82 Electrical Fixtures, Parts & Supplies 56432 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 104.94 Plumbing Supplies 56433 Cooper Camerion Corporation 6,585.63 Cen Gen Engine Parts 56434 Corporate Express Imaging 2,401.70 Computer Supplies 56435 Corporate Express 4,715.74 Office Supplies 56436 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 830.03 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56437 County Wholesale Electric Co. 454.80 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56438 CEM Corporation 1,400.16 Lab Supplies 56439 CEPA Company 125.00 Lab Equipment Maint. Service 56440 CGvL Engineers 3,757.28 Engineering Services P1-94 56441 CR&R, Inc. 315.00 Container Rentals 56442 County Sanitation District No. 70 6,290.00 Olfactometry Lab Expense 56443 CSMFO 100.00 Membership 56444 CWEA 150.00 Notices & Ads 56445 CWEA Membership 97.00 Membership - Calif. Water Environment Assoc. 56446 David's Tree Service 5,875.00 Tree Maint. Service 56447 Del Mar Analytical 2,555.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 56448 Diamond H Recognition 111.61 Employee Service Awards 56449 Document Control Solutions, Inc. 2,108.00 Software Support 56450 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 316.61 Paint Supplies 56451 DGA Consultants, Inc. 4,697.00 Engineering Services - CCTV Data Evaluation Support 56452 DMARK Corporation 4,240.97 Workbench & Accessories 56453 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 2,301.15 Electrical Supplies 56454 Ecology Control Industries 1,297.33 Hazardous Waste Services 56455 Ecology Tire, Inc. 338.50 Waste Management - Tires 56456 Edinger Medical Group, Inc. 1,000.00 Medical Screening 56457 Electro-Test, Inc. 10,285.80 Professional Services J-33-1 56458 Employers Group 3,009.40 Membership 56459 Employers Group Service Corp. 1,750.00 Human Resources On-Site Training 56460 Employment Development Dept. 2,338.27 State Unemployment Tax 56461 Enchanter, Inc. 2,700.00 Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance 56462 Eriez Magnetics 2,787.01 Lifting Magnets 56463 ENS Resources, Inc. 15,000.00 Professional Services - Legislative Advocate 56464 FedEx Corporation 138.14 Air Freight 56465 Filarsky & Watt, L.L.P. 4,275.00 Prof. Services - OCSD Bargaining Group Labor Negotiation Meetings & Special Services 56466 First American Real Estate Solutions 647.50 Subscription to Orange County Property Information 56467 Fisher Scientific 16,064.64 Lab Parts & Supplies 56468 Flomax Products, Inc. 922.77 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56469 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 21,514.87 Long-Term & Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 56470 Franklin Covey 269.05 Office Supplies 56471 Fry's Electronics 977.80 Computer Supplies 56472 G.F.O.A. 95.00 Accounting Training Registration 56473 Garratt-Callahan Company 4,086.75 Chemicals 56474 General Petroleum 17,761.01 Unleaded Gasoline 56475 Gerhardt's, Inc. 2,568.61 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56476 Getinge Castle 911.24 Lab Parts & Supplies 56477 Golden State Controls 751.18 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56478 Grafix Training & Consulting 4,631.50 On-Site Adobe Acrobat Training 56479 Grainger, Inc. 7,221.93 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56480 Haaker Equipment Company 168.14 Misc. Vehicle Repairs, Parts & Service 56481 Hach c/o Ponton Industries 1,353.97 Lab Parts & Supplies

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 4 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56482 Hach Company 1,960.50 Lab Supplies 56483 Harbour Engineering Group 15,604.00 (4) 14" Gould Pump Impellers 56484 Harold Primrose Ice 55.50 Ice For Samples 56485 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Inc. 308.53 Plumbing Supplies 56486 Heat Technology Products 4,703.04 Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Repairs 56487 Herman Miller Workplace Resource 7.24 Office Supplies 56488 Home Depot 193.30 Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material 56489 Hopkins Technical Products 498.92 Pump Supplies 56490 Hub Auto Supply 500.87 Vehicle Parts & Supplies 56491 HI Standard Automotive 388.77 Automotive Parts, Supplies & Repairs 56492 Industrial Distribution Group 1,501.28 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56493 Industrial Threaded Products, Inc. 3,033.64 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56494 Information Resources 875.00 Human Resources Service - Background Checks 56495 Insight Investments 4,697.90 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56496 Intratek Computer, Inc. 8,760.00 IBM Network Support 56497 Invensys Systems, Inc. 5,258.91 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56498 Ionics Instrument Business Group 2,507.20 Lab Supplies 56499 Iron Mountain 75.00 Bid Document Storage Fees P1-37 & J-39 56500 Iron Mountain Off-Site Data Protection 234.00 Offsite Back-Up Tape Storage for NT Server 56501 ISCO, Inc. 9,051.00 Instrument Parts & Supplies 56502 IPI GrammTech, Inc. 13,612.50 Software Maint. Agreement 56503 J E Phillips Company, Inc. 4,195.79 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56504 J.G. Tucker and Son, Inc. 1,300.27 Cell Chlorine for Cal 2000 Generator 56505 J.L. Wingert Co. 1,508.65 Electrical Supplies 56506 Jay's Catering 775.26 Meeting Expenses 56507 Jensen Instrument Co. 1,667.73 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56508 Johnson & Associates, L.L.C. 5,000.00 Professional Services - 2003 Benchmark Survey Update 56509 Johnstone Supply 17.34 Water Filters 56510 JPMorgan Chase Bank 8,798.00 Annual Administration Fees for 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation 56511 Kforce, Inc. 5,822.31 Temporary Employment Services 56512 Kroy, L.L.C. 81.30 Stationery & Office Supplies 56513 KW Communications 5,257.50 Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project 56514 Lee & Ro, Inc. 1,993.99 Professional Services P1-93 56515 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 106.63 Meeting Expense 56516 LINJER 1,792.52 Professional Service - DART MO 9-22-99 56517 M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. 3,456.00 Professional Services - Corrosion Assessment Study 56518 MassMutual Michel Financial Group 3,950.64 Executive Disability Plan Premium 56519 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontario Branch 517.74 Valves 56520 McBain Instruments 130.26 Microscope Service & Parts 56521 McMahan Business Interiors 676.02 Computer Cabinet 56522 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 3,807.48 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56523 McRay Industries, Inc. 4,060.45 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56524 Mechanical Seal Repair, Inc. 802.62 Mechanical Seal Repair 56525 Medlin Controls Co. 1,365.77 Instrument Supplies 56526 Michael Asner Consulting 450.00 Purchasing Training Registration 56527 Mid-West Associates 5,471.94 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56528 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 1,240.00 Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance 56529 Mission Uniform Service 4,341.04 Uniform Rentals 56530 Motor Cargo 135.25 Freight 56531 Myers Power Products, Inc. 84.35 Electrical Supplies 56532 MARMAC Field Services, Inc. 22,934.10 Professional Services 5-56 56533 MGD Technologies, Inc. 18,300.00 Temporary Flow Monitoring

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 5 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56534 Mine Safety Appliances 1,167.46 Instrument Parts & Supplies 56535 National Institute of Standards & Technology 1,184.00 Lab Parts & Supplies 56536 National Plant Services, Inc. 440.00 Vacuum Truck Services 56537 Neal Supply Co. 7.65 Plumbing Supplies 56538 Network Associates, Inc. 3,556.77 Software Upgrade 56539 NetVersant of Southern California 5,559.86 Security System Maintenance 56540 New Hermes, Inc. 247.17 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56541 Newark Electronics 156.44 Instrument Supplies 56542 Nicholas Netty 605.00 I.N.S. Permit Fees 56543 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 741.45 Turbine Oil 56544 Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. 109.34 Battery & Tray for Honda Generator 56545 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 138.40 Steel Tags 56546 Office Depot Business Services Div. 2,757.52 Office Supplies 56547 Omega Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,093.80 Janitorial Supplies 56548 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 1,073.69 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56549 Orange County Hose Company 293.45 Hose Supplies & Parts 56550 The Orange County Register 3,284.08 Subscription 56551 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 92.00 Plumbing Supplies 56552 Osterbauer Compressor 1,118.49 Mechanical Supplies 56553 Oxygen Service Company 2,772.20 Specialty Gases 56554 OCASSE 99.00 Safety & Health Meeting Registration 56555 OCDM Marketing 5,725.50 Processing Fees - Public Notice Mailing & Postage 56556 ORE Offshore 9,899.68 Coastal Acoustic Release Transponder 56557 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 185.67 Electrical Supplies 56558 Pacific Industrial Supply 606.47 Small Tools 56559 Pacific Parts & Controls, Inc. 236.62 Electrical Supplies 56560 Pacific Process Equipment, Inc. 123.35 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56561 Parker Hannifin Corporation 224.14 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56562 Parker Supply Company 20,045.71 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56563 Parkhouse Tire, Inc. 3,607.98 Tires 56564 Paulus Engineering, Inc. 8,837.00 Construction - Sink Hole Repairs on Beach Blvd. 56565 PenValve 2,618.25 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56566 Perma Pure, Inc. 72.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 56567 PinnacleOne Institute 675.00 Engineering & Construction Training Registration 56568 Power Design 8,490.70 Power Supply 56569 Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. 463.45 Employee Legal Service Insurance Premium 56570 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 4,505.52 Office Furniture 56571 Process Equipment Company 879.15 Pump Supplies 56572 Projects Partners 1,119.20 Temporary Employment Services 56573 PCS Express, Inc. 110.00 Courier Service 56574 PRSA - Orange County Chapter 75.00 Notices & Ads 56575 Quinn Shepard Machinery 32.81 Catapillar Oil Filters 56576 R & R Instrumentation, Inc. 1,040.40 Instrument Supplies 56577 R. W. Beck 3,233.80 Professional Services P1-90 56578 Rainin Instrument, L.L.C. 540.37 Lab Parts & Supplies 56579 Reliastar 9,403.70 Employee Medical Health Premium 56580 Relizon Company 387.90 Publication 56581 RemedyTemp, Inc. 2,397.44 Temporary Employment Services 56582 Retrofit Parts & Components, Inc. 3,805.59 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56583 RPM Electric Motors 967.46 Repairs & Maintenance Service 56584 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 1,034.40 Pump Supplies 56585 Safety-Kleen 500.20 Parts Washer Lease & Service

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 6 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56586 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 2,771.24 Lab Parts & Supplies 56587 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 2,030.00 Construction - Pump Out (3) Air Jumpers 56588 Schwing America, Inc. 29.12 Pump Supplies 56589 Scottel Voice & Data, Inc. 2,284.80 Telephone System Maintenance 56590 Sethco Division / Met-Pro Corp 1,156.93 Pump Supplies 56591 Shamrock Supply Co., Inc. 528.08 Painting Supplies 56592 Shasta Electric, L.P. 23,180.49 Construction - Electrical Cable Removal 56593 Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. 136.79 Lab Parts & Supplies 56594 Smardan Supply Company/Orange Coast 213.13 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56595 Smith Pipe & Supply 587.92 Plumbing Supplies 56596 Smith-Emery Company 82.00 Concrete & Other Materials Testing 56597 Sparling Instruments, Inc. 2,362.29 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56598 Spex Certiprep, Inc. 308.74 Lab Parts & Supplies 56599 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 581.35 Carpet Cleaning Services 56600 Strata International, Inc. 505.46 Chemicals 56601 Summit Steel 863.36 Metal 56602 Sunset Ford 12.61 Automotive Parts & Service 56603 Sunset Industrial Parts 4,679.38 Mechanical Supplies 56604 Super Power Products 775.80 Janitorial Supplies 56605 Systime Computer Corp. 17,975.00 Professional Services - J D Edwards One World XE Implementation 56606 SC Field Technical Services 2,675.95 Flame Arrester 56607 SETAC 500.00 Compliance Meeting Registration 56608 SPX Valves & Control 4,929.78 Valves 56609 T & C Industrial Controls, Inc. 929.24 Electrical Supplies 56610 Tekdraulics, Inc. 2,076.08 Mechanical Supplies 56611 Teledyne Electronic Tech. 175.81 Instrument Parts 56612 Terminix International 3,045.00 Pest Control 56613 Terminix International Co. #2474 910.00 Pest Control 56614 Thomas V. Gerlinger 1,385.00 Lab Analyses 56615 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,741.61 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56616 Time Motion Tools 236.67 Tools 56617 Time Warner Communication 40.47 Cable Services 56618 Times Community News 350.00 Notices & Ads 56619 Todd Painting, Inc. 2,908.80 Painting Services - Electrical & Instrumentation Bldg. 6 56620 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 71.85 Locks & Keys 56621 Toshiba International Corporation 106.54 Electrical Repairs 56622 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative & Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 56623 Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. 11,170.09 Contract Groundskeeping MO 5-11-94 56624 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 688.54 Automotive Supplies 56625 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 2,220.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 56626 TEKsystems 13,371.00 Temporary Employment Services 56627 US Filter Corporation 1,159.00 Service Agreement - Lab Purification System 56628 Ultra Scientific 319.70 Lab Supplies 56629 United Parcel Service 1,088.25 Parcel Services 56630 United States Treasury 2,929.78 Professional Services J-85 - Naval Post Graduate School 56631 UC Regents 1,245.00 Human Resources Training Registration 56632 US Filter Westates Carbon 1,679.84 200 Series Carbon Absorber 56633 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 13,346.00 Temporary Employment Service 56634 Varian, Inc. 2,367.10 Lab Parts & Supplies 56635 Verne's Plumbing 175.00 Service Contract - Testing & Cert. Backflow Devices at Plts. 1 & 2 & Pump Sta. 56636 Village Nurseries 29.08 Landscaping Supplies 56637 Vision Service Plan-(CA) 9,007.20 Vision Service Premium

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 7 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56638 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 6,914.91 Lab Parts & Supplies 56639 The Wackenhut Corporation 17,204.85 Security Guards 56640 Waco Filters 2,018.04 Filters 56641 Water 3 Engineering, Inc. 13,171.63 Engineering Service J-67 56642 Waxie Sanitary Supply 651.99 Janitorial Supplies 56643 Weber Scientific 369.35 Lab Supplies 56644 Western States Controls 1,895.66 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56645 WEF 1,608.00 Membership - Water Environment Federation 56646 Xerox Corp - OMNI 3,848.16 Fax Machine 56647 Xerox Corporation 11,677.10 Fax & Copier Leases 56648 XESystems, Inc. 825.00 Xerox Synergix Scan System Maintenance Agreement 56649 York International 361.53 Oil & Filters 56650 Zee Medical 90.51 Safety Supplies 56651 Unity Constructors 14,487.30 Construction 7-14-4 56652 Juan J. Ambriz 328.64 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56653 Emilio Ariston 457.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56654 Layne T. Baroldi 149.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56655 James L. Burror 131.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56656 James A. Carter 237.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56657 George A. Charette 488.12 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56658 Peter Cheffs 392.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56659 Donald R. Cleveland 194.07 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56660 Philip F. Cordova 302.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56661 Carla D. Dillon 304.88 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56662 John B. Falkenstein 312.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56663 David P. Francis 272.45 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56664 Roy A. Hendy 501.81 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56665 Tyler T. Hoang 504.55 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56666 Deirdre E. Hunter 610.21 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56667 Chandra R. Johannesson 169.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56668 Voided Check - - 56669 Michael J. McCusker 391.56 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56670 John Mirkovich 488.33 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56671 Joseph W. Park, Jr. 479.12 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56672 Steven D. Pelletier 509.53 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56673 William F. Pierce 274.99 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56674 Michael Reideler 328.15 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56675 Roy J. Reynolds 306.48 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56676 Darren J. Schuler 280.18 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56677 Robert J. Taylor 507.10 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56678 Mary S. Thompson 346.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56679 Steven M. Thornburg 462.79 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56680 Joseph F. Vallone 215.87 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56681 Marco Polo S. Velasco 517.76 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56682 Michael Vuong 530.47 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56683 Thomas Walker 276.63 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56684 Lawrence A. Wigington 333.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56685 Robyn A. Wilcox 256.82 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56686 Morris C. Ying 253.69 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56687 K & K, Inc. 2,164.36 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 56688 Maclay TR 803.53 User Fee Refund Re Septic Tanks 56689 Orange County Sanitation District 957.02 Petty Cash Reimb.

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 8 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56690 Wild Rivers Waterpark 1,629.00 Employee Deposit Transfer 56691 Orange County Sanitation District 610,729.60 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 56692 Orange County Water District 801,877.05 Construction - Joint GWRS Project J-36 56693 Orange County Sanitation District 33,627.28 Worker's Comp. Reimb. 56694 Allied Packing & Rubber, Inc. 1,937.67 Plumbing Supplies 56695 American Airlines 1,761.00 Travel Services 56696 Association of Calif. Water Agencies 190.00 Communications Training Registration 56697 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 62.09 Telephone Service 56698 Boxwood Technology, Inc. 125.00 Notices & Ads 56699 BAF Industries 1,531.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56700 Court Order 150.00 Wage Garnishment 56701 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 27.07 Plumbing Supplies 56702 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 56703 Dawson Company 844.45 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56704 Dept. of Fish & Game 127.25 Permit - SARI Line Maint. 56705 Electra-Bond, Inc. 80.81 Valve Coating 56706 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,898.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 56707 Employers Group 220.00 On-Site Performance Review Training 56708 Engineering Central 49.99 Notices & Ads 56709 Carla Louise Eroles 445.00 Wage Garnishment 56710 City of Fountain Valley 1,129.00 Building Permit - J-89 56711 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 56712 Franchise Tax Board 175.00 Wage Garnishment 56713 City of Fullerton 225.53 Water Use 56714 Graybar Electric Company 114.06 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56715 City of Huntington Beach 24,036.44 Water Use 56716 Industrial Metal Supply 139.30 Metal 56717 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 56718 Intl. Union of Oper. Eng. AFL-CIO Local 501 3,691.78 Dues Deduction 56719 Ionics Instrument Business Group 421.39 Lab Parts & Supplies 56720 Jaco Electronics 5.08 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56721 John Mangiapane 300.00 Repair Service - Trawl Nets 56722 Maintenance Technology Corp 39.30 Hardware 56723 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 340.36 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56724 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 6,961.00 Repairs & Maintenance Service 56725 Milltronics c/o RMB Engineering 4,180.58 Electrical Supplies 56726 The Mission Viejo News, Inc. 1,014.00 Notices & Ads 56727 Moody's Investor's Service 5,500.00 COP Rating Maintenance Fees 56728 Moreland & Associates 3,501.00 Auditing Services MO 3-8-95 56729 National Bond & Trust 2,045.44 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 56730 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 982.60 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56731 OCEA 561.61 Dues Deduction 56732 Pacific Bell/WorldCom 15.59 Telephone Service 56733 Court Order 40.00 Wage Garnishment 56734 Court Order 296.00 Wage Garnishment 56735 Peace Officers Council of CA 1,566.00 Dues Deduction 56736 PenValve 260.04 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 56737 Pleion Corp. #2 801.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56738 Primavera Systems, Inc. 3,840.00 Software Maint. 56739 PAPA 110.00 O & M Training Registration 56740 RBC Transport Dynamics 808.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56741 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 156.60 Mechanical Parts & Supplies

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 9 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/01/03 to 10/15/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56742 Court Order 721.50 Wage Garnishment 56743 So. Cal. Gas Company 24,269.17 Natural Gas 56744 South Bay Chrome Sales 23.55 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56745 Southern California Edison 1,390.21 Power 56746 State Board of Equalization 208.91 Underground Petroleum Storage Tank Fee 56747 SBC 20.54 Telephone Services 56748 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 1,558.44 Mechanical Supplies 56749 The Unisource Corporation 555.19 Office Supplies 56750 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 56751 Verizon California 6,267.51 Telephone Services 56752 XZX Electronics, Inc. 59.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56753 Marc A. Brown 404.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56754 Keith W. Criscuolo 46.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56755 Thomas D. DoDderer 461.73 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56756 Mark A. Esquer 144.39 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56757 Tim H. Hopkins 116.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56758 John D. Linder 230.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56759 Henry E. Lorimer 251.74 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56760 Robert Michna 102.33 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56761 Fred J. O'Brien 320.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56762 Robert Ooten 298.02 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56763 Rory Rea 112.50 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56764 Brian K. Reed 366.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56765 Douglas M. Stewart 130.24 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56766 Michael D. White 250.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 56767 Hughes Associates, Inc. 12,478.80 Prof. Services J-33-1A Total Accounts Payable - Warrants $ 8,742,861.69

Payroll Disbursements 31184 - 31271 Employee Paychecks$ 135,318.44 Biweekly Payroll 10/01/03 31272 - 31382 Employee Paychecks 156,703.39 Biweekly Payroll 10/15/03 31383 - 31392 Interim Paychecks 103,262.35 Retroactive Salary Adjustments, IDEA Awards & Payroll Adjustment 90006 - 90504 Direct Deposit Statements 874,737.10 Biweekly Payroll 10/01/03 90505 - 91014 Direct Deposit Statements 938,456.31 Biweekly Payroll 10/15/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 2,208,477.59

Wire Transfer Payments JP Morgan Chase Bank$ 30,076.66 September Interest Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation JP Morgan Chase Bank 131,284.25 September Societe Generale Swap Payment on 1993 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 161,360.91

Total Claims Paid 10/01/03 - 10/15/03 $ 11,112,700.19

fin/210/lc EXHIBIT A G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 101503.xls Page 10 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description Accounts Payable - Warrants 56768 Atkins Americas, Inc.$ 32,900.00 Professional Services J-40-6 56769 Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. 32,133.49 Sodium Bisulfite 56770 Bell Land Surveying 47,575.07 Professional Surveying Services - Various Capital Projects 56771 Black & Veatch Corporation 107,862.06 Engineering Services J-77, J-87, P1-46-2 & P1-76 56772 Brown & Caldwell 86,483.64 Professional Services 1-98 56773 City of Huntington Beach 767,556.75 Cooperative Projects Reimbursements 56774 City of Santa Ana 271,000.00 Cooperative Projects Reimbursements 56775 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company 67,118.00 Painting Maint. Services MO 4-22-98 56776 Environmental Science Associates 51,383.21 Professional Services J-40-5 56777 Fortis Benefits Insurance Company 40,758.77 Long-Term & Short-Term Disability Ins. Premium 56778 Hill Brothers 28,522.19 Chemicals - Odor & Corrosion Control - Newport Trunkline 56779 Jazz Semiconductor 43,682.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56780 Kemiron Pacific, Inc. 258,277.86 Ferric Chloride MO 9-27-95 56781 Kforce, Inc. 41,927.76 Temporary Employment Services 56782 Knott's Berry Farm Foods 41,290.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56783 Lee & Ro, Inc. 38,397.89 Professional Services 5-50, 5-51 & 5-52 56784 Municipal Water Dist. of Orange County 341,337.44 Water Use Efficiency Program MO 9-22-99 56785 MDS Consulting 25,277.01 Prof. Services - Surveying Various Capital Projects 56786 Partners Consulting Services 28,200.00 FIS On-Site Support - One World XE Migration Project 56787 Pioneer Americas, Inc. 455,093.45 Sodium Hypochlorite 56788 Polydyne, Inc. 73,010.72 Cationic Polymer MO 3-11-92 56789 Southern Contracting Company 45,164.00 Construction J-33-1 56790 SPS Technologies 31,588.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56791 The Trane Company 37,066.00 Heating & Air Conditioning Installation 56792 Tule Ranch/Magan Farms 152,106.30 Residuals Removal MO 3-29-95 56793 U.S. Peroxide 322,558.29 Hydrogen Peroxide 56794 J R Filanc Construction 1,656,973.44 Construction P1-76 56795 J F Shea Construction, Inc. 1,174,230.73 Construction P2-85, J-87 & J-35-2 56796 Margate Construction, Inc. 1,858,289.00 Construction P1-37 56797 eSysTek 480.00 Software 56798 Abrasive Engineering Tool & Equipment 91.32 Hardware 56799 Accurate Circuit Engineering 666.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56800 Accurate Metal Fabricators, Inc. 324.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56801 Accutite Fasteners, Inc. 114.21 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56802 Adamson Industries 1,805.68 Lab Parts & Supplies 56803 Advance Tech Plating #2 44.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56804 Advanced Measurements & Controls, Inc. 3,868.00 Instrument Parts & Supplies 56805 Air Industries Corporation 1,064.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56806 Air Industries 7,253.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56807 Air Liquide America Corp. 763.13 Specialty Gases 56808 Airco Filter Service 539.27 Fuel Filters 56809 Airgas - West 6.60 Demurrage 56810 Airgas Safety, Inc. 9,031.07 Safety Supplies & Equipment 56811 All Metal Paint Stripping Inc. #2 2,607.23 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56812 Allied Pacific Metal Stamping 881.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56813 Alloy Die casting 604.44 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56814 Almatron Electronics 471.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 1 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56815 Alum-A-Therm 109.04 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56816 Aluminum Forge 1,630.15 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56817 Amcor - Sunclipse, Inc. 3,811.57 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56818 American Express 23,160.17 Purchasing Card Program, Misc. Supplies & Services 56819 American Fildelity Assurance Company 132.00 Employee Voluntary Cancer Insurance 56820 American Public Works Association 520.00 Communication Meeting Registration/O&M Membership 56821 Amerimax Building Products, Inc. 830.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56822 Ametek Aerospace 18.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56823 Anaheim Extrusion Co., Inc. 176.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56824 Anaheim General Hospital 122.35 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56825 City of Anaheim - Water Services 11,064.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56826 Analytical Products Group, Inc. 865.00 Lab Supplies 56827 Appleone Employment Service 12,295.33 Temporary Employment Services 56828 Aqua-Con 600.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56829 Aquatic Bioassay And Consulting Labs, Inc. 1,550.00 Toxicity Testing 56830 Arnold Electronics #1 4,504.38 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56831 Arrowhead Products 4,286.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56832 Autodesk University/Enterprise Events 1,245.00 Planning Meeting Registration 56833 API Basco 2,310.51 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56834 APW Enclosure Systems 3,545.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56835 APW Enclosure Systems, LLC (South St) 1,642.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56836 ARO Services 146.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56837 ASSE American Soc. of Safety Engineers 570.00 Safety & Health Meeting Registration 56838 AWSI 166.00 Department of Transportation Training Program 56839 B. Braun Medical, Inc. 7,357.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56840 Basic Chemical Solutions 1,880.69 Sodium Bisulfite 56841 Battery Specialties 261.83 Batteries 56842 Bauer Compressors 152.46 Compressor Parts 56843 Bazz Houston Co. 732.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56844 Bearing Inspection, Inc. 89.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56845 Beckman Coulter, Inc. 7,296.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56846 BioMerieux Vitek, Inc. 219.75 Lab Parts & Supplies 56847 Boeing - Anaheim 12,822.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56848 Boeing Company, The 9,324.21 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56849 Bondlogistix, L.L.C. 8,100.00 Prof. Serv. - Preparation of Interim Arbitrage Rebate Report Series 2000B COPs 56850 Brenntag West, Inc. 1,000.78 Janitorial Supplies 56851 Brenton Safety, Inc. 334.03 Safety Supplies 56852 Bristol Industries 1,644.12 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56853 Bush & Associates, Inc. 4,264.00 Surveying Services MO 6-25-97 56854 Cal-Aurum Industries 5.32 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56855 Cal-Glass, Inc. 80.60 Lab Equipment Maint. Service 56856 Cal-Tronics Circuit Inc. - Santa Ana 128.36 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56857 California Automatic Gate 782.19 Automatic Gate Maintenance - Both Plants 56858 California Bank & Trust 5,018.00 Construction J-33-1A, Retention 56859 Caltrol, Inc. 323.25 Mechanical Parts, Supplies & Repairs 56860 Cardlock Fuels 1,093.38 Fueling District Vehicles at Local Gas Stations 56861 Cargill, Inc. 21.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56862 Carl Warren & Co. 514.22 Insurance Claims Administrator

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 2 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56863 Carleton Engineers & Consultants, Inc. 175.01 Engineering Services - Air Quality 56864 Carollo Engineers 14,419.53 Professional Services P1-60 & P2-60 56865 Catalina Cylinders 2,635.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56866 Cell2Cell 52.09 Communication Equipment 56867 Center for Creative Growth 2,300.00 Professional Services - O & M Management Coaching 56868 Chapman Hospital 348.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56869 Cheek Engineering & Stamping 826.16 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56870 City of La Habra 4,500.00 Cooperative Projects Reimbursements 56871 City of Los Alamitos 4,649.06 Connection Fee Duplicate Payment Refund 56872 Cleugh's Rhubarb 18,357.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56873 Clickguard Corporation 158.25 Printer Service Agreement 56874 Coast Fire Equipment 226.09 Fire Extinguisher Maintenance & Service 56875 Color Arts, Inc. 1,210.40 Vehicle Decals 56876 Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. 1,100.00 Analyses of Wastewater, Industrial Wastewater & Biosolids 56877 Huntington Beach Medical Center 197.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56878 Columbia West Anaheim Medical Center 951.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56879 Commercial Roof Management, Inc. 2,000.00 Skylight Replacement 56880 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 9,200.00 Prof. Serv. - Rev. to Elec. Emerg. Oper. Procedures at Plt. 1 & Load Shedding Proc. at Plt. 2 56881 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 2,984.90 Computer Maintenance 56882 Consolidated Elect. Distributors, Inc. 3,205.52 Electrical Supplies 56883 Consumers Pipe & Supply Co. 314.06 Plumbing Supplies 56884 Control Factors - Seattle, Inc. 994.80 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56885 Coordinated Wire Rope & Rigging 295.02 Rigging Supplies 56886 Corporate Express Imaging 345.83 Computer Supplies 56887 Corporate Express 925.55 Office Supplies 56888 Cortech Engineering 3,934.22 Pump Supplies 56889 Counterpart Enterprises, Inc. 130.57 Cen Gen Air Filters 56890 County Wholesale Electric Co. 9.09 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56891 Crescent Chemical Co., Inc. 260.72 Lab Parts & Supplies 56892 Criterion Machine Works 897.94 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56893 Crockett Container Corp. 1,885.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56894 Custom Control Sensors 121.02 Electrical Supplies 56895 CEPA Company 223.28 Lab Equipment Maint. Service 56896 CR&R, Inc. 2,205.00 Container Rentals 56897 CRC RIM, Inc. 6,988.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56898 CWEA Membership 231.00 Membership - Calif. Water Environment Assoc. 56899 Dapper Tire Co. 587.95 Truck Tires 56900 Data Aire, Inc. 1,212.87 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56901 Day Wireless Systems 1,050.00 Professional Services - Microwave System Repairs 56902 Del Mar Analytical 2,136.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 56903 Delphi Automotive Systems, L.L.C. 17,310.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56904 Derm Cosmetic Labs, Inc. 1,878.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56905 Diamond H Recognition 72.44 Employee Service Awards 56906 DigiPhoto 10.95 Photographic Services 56907 Dionex Corporation 1,895.21 Lab Parts & Supplies 56908 Ditty Drum Co., Inc. 93.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56909 Ducommun Aerostructures 3,813.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56910 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 37.93 Paint Supplies

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 3 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56911 E. Sam Jones Distributors, Inc. 916.96 Electrical Supplies 56912 Eaton Corporation/MSC Products 2,009.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56913 El Metate, Inc. 5,827.93 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56914 Electro Numerics, Inc. 1,417.03 Electrical Supplies 56915 Electro-Test, Inc. 2,100.00 Professional Services - Electrical Acceptance Testing 56916 Embee, Inc. #1 1,480.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56917 Embee, Inc. #2 206.13 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56918 Embee, Inc. #3 1,179.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56919 Empire Pipe Cleaning & Equipment, Inc. 15,240.38 Sewer Line Cleaning & Testing 56920 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 607.60 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 56921 Enchanter, Inc. 3,600.00 Ocean Monitoring & Outfall Inspection & Maintenance 56922 Engravers Ink Company 32.90 Reimbursed User Fee Refund Program 56923 Environmental Express 99.88 Lab Supplies 56924 Environmental Microbiology Consulting 7,310.00 Professional Services J-40-6 56925 Environmental Resource Association 1,162.90 Lab Supplies 56926 Fabrication Concepts Corporation 4,148.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56927 FedEx Corporation 100.59 Air Freight 56928 Fineline Circuits & Tech. 49.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56929 Fisher Scientific Company, L.L.C. 7,065.07 Lab Parts & Supplies 56930 Flat and Vertical, Inc. 135.00 Concrete Cutting 56931 Foodcraft Coffee & Refreshment Services 732.25 Meeting Supplies 56932 Fountain Valley Camera 9.84 Photographic Services 56933 Franklin Covey 94.55 Office Supplies 56934 Fry's Electronics 115.97 Computer Supplies 56935 Fullerton Plating 102.69 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56936 FMH Investor Group 2,956.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56937 Gardner Lithograph OOB'D 7/31/03 1,279.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56938 Garratt-Callahan Company 113.14 Chemicals 56939 Getinge Castle 532.00 Lab Instrument Maintenance 56940 Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. 6,605.08 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56941 Golden State Controls 358.14 Electrical Parts & Supplies 56942 Gomtech Electronics 216.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56943 Gorilla's Polishing and Plating Corp. 49.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56944 Grafix Training & Consulting 215.00 On-Site Acrobat Training 56945 Graybar Electric Company 14,481.60 Computer Software/Hardware 56946 Guy L. Warden & Sons 302.09 Pump Supplies 56947 H Koch & Sons 2,569.83 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56948 Hamilton Materials 972.46 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56949 Harbor Truck Bodies, Inc. 106.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56950 Harold Primrose Ice 74.00 Ice For Samples 56951 Harte-Hanks Shoppers 4,724.29 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56952 The Hartwell Corporation 507.81 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56953 Hasco Oil Co., Inc. 193.73 Lube Oil 56954 Hawk Industrial Uniform 1,009.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56955 Heat Technology Products 10,469.14 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56956 Hilti, Inc. 1,092.55 Tools 56957 The Holman Group 897.48 Employee Assistance Program Premium 56958 Home Depot 1,271.64 Misc. Repair & Maintenance Material

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 4 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 56959 Hub Auto Supply 247.77 Vehicle Parts & Supplies 56960 Hyatt Die Casting & Engineering Corp. 1,853.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56961 Industrial Distribution Group 481.33 Electrical & Painting Supplies 56962 Industrial Metal Supply 120.15 Metal 56963 Intergraph Corporation 387.90 Software Maint. Agreement 56964 Interstate Batteries of Cal Coast 1,016.19 Batteries for Vehicles & Carts 56965 Invensys Systems, Inc. 362.60 Instrument Supplies 56966 Irvine Pipe & Supply 756.44 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56967 Irvine Ranch Water District 41.70 Water Use 56968 Irvine Sensors Corp. 4,222.30 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56969 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 11,128.03 Prof. Services P2-74 & Various Repairs & Maintenance Services 56970 Jay's Catering 3,122.52 Meeting Expenses 56971 Jefferson Smurfit Corp. (U.S.) 2,261.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56972 Jellco Container, Inc. 1,092.65 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56973 Johnson Controls Inc. 11,899.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56974 Johnstone Supply 696.56 Electrical Supplies 56975 Kelly Paper 99.51 Paper 56976 Kenlen Specialities, Inc. 130.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56977 Kent Automotive 326.31 Automotive Parts & Supplies 56978 Kirkhill Rubber 2,689.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56979 Kirkhill Rubber Company (South) 11,215.28 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56980 KCA Electronics, Inc. 343.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56981 KW Communications 5,603.31 Community Outreach Re Bushard Trunkline Replacement Project 56982 Leach Corp. 2,987.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56983 Los Angeles Times 9,540.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56984 Lucci's Gourmet Foods, Inc. 230.18 Meeting Expense 56985 M.S. Bellows 140.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56986 Marden Susco, Inc. 534.63 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56987 Margaretis Textile Service 3,532.20 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56988 Mark Optics, Inc. 267.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56989 Maruchan, Inc. 16,878.11 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56990 Mask Technology, Inc. 16.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56991 Material Control, Inc. 1,515.66 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 56992 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, L.L.P. 5,000.00 Legislative Advocacy Services 56993 Mc Junkin Corp--Ontario Branch 125.31 Plumbing Supplies 56994 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 377.13 Mechanical & Lab Parts & Supplies 56995 Mead Westvaco Packaging 11,735.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56996 Mec Analytical System 8,433.00 Toxicity Analysis 56997 Medeva Pharmaceuticals CA, Inc. 2,564.58 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 56998 Medlin Controls Co. 1,454.58 Instrument Supplies 56999 Medtronic Heartvalve Division, Inc. 7,226.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57000 Mesa Consolidated Water District 3,528.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57001 Michael Asner Consulting 1,350.00 Prof. Serv. - Develop RFP Handbook & Internal Policies & Procedures for Purchasing Div. 57002 Micrometals, Inc. #2 944.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57003 MicroSemi 1,438.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57004 Microsemi Intergrated Products 1,587.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57005 Mid-West Associates 250.38 Pump Supplies 57006 Midway Mfg. & Machining Co. 6,734.38 Mechanical Parts & Supplies

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 5 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57007 Milbank West, Inc. 385.03 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57008 Millett Industries 146.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57009 Mission Uniform Service 2,973.08 Uniform Rentals 57010 Monogram Systems 2,813.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57011 Murrietta Circuits 463.98 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57012 MAG-TROL, Inc. 2,998.68 Electrical Supplies 57013 Nelco Products, Inc. 2,522.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57014 NetVersant of Southern California 3,675.43 Installation of Camera at GWRS Gate - J-36 57015 Newark Electronics 331.38 Electrical Parts & Supplies 57016 Newport Corporation 11,007.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57017 Nickey Petroleum Co., Inc. 1,069.17 Machine Oil 57018 Ninyo & Moore Corporate Accounting 10,081.16 Professional Services - Materials Testing, Inspection & Geotechnical Engineering 57019 The Norco Companies 170.78 Mail Delivery Service 57020 Nu-Way Laser Engraving 269.10 Steel Tags 57021 Office Depot Business Services Div. 1,012.42 Office Supplies 57022 Ohmart/VEGA Corp. 2,133.18 Freight - Hazardous Materials 57023 OneSource Distributors, Inc. 353.78 Electrical Parts & Supplies 57024 Ora Beth Scott 76.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57025 Orange County Hose Company 33.60 Hose Supplies & Parts 57026 Orange Courier 189.00 Courier Services 57027 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 1,646.64 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 57028 Oxygen Service Company 2,469.99 Specialty Gases 57029 P.L. Hawn Company, Inc. 1,027.94 Electrical Supplies 57030 Pacific Mechanical Supply 560.90 Plumbing Supplies 57031 Pacifica Aerospace Corp. 1,867.43 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57032 Parker Hannifin Corporation 126.01 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57033 Parker Supply Company 1,268.92 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57034 Peak Technologies 2,485.90 Lab Parts & Supplies 57035 PenValve 426.75 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57036 Pepsi-Cola Bottling 9,139.89 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57037 Performance Powder, Inc. 93.85 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57038 Perkin Elmer Corporation 474.67 Lab Parts & Supplies 57039 Perma Pure, Inc. 217.22 Filters 57040 Pico Farad, Inc. 838.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57041 Pilkington Aerospace 10,564.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57042 Pitney Bowes 538.35 Repairs & Maintenance Service - Pitney Bowes Letter Opener 57043 Powdercoat Services 88.73 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57044 Powdercoat Services #2 287.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57045 Powdercoat Services #4 25.62 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57046 Power Electro Supply Co., Inc. 232.12 Electrical Supplies 57047 Precision Painting 731.86 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57048 California Fineblanking Corp. 204.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57049 Precon, Inc. 104.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57050 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 15,435.19 Office Furniture 57051 Propipe 815.30 CCTV Sewerline Inspection 57052 Prudential Overall Supply 135.22 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57053 Pure Chem Products Co. 111.76 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57054 Putzmeister - America 328.79 Mechanical Parts & Supplies

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 6 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57055 PC Magazine 69.97 Subscription 57056 PCG Industries 1,675.00 Mechanical Repairs & Maintenance Service 57057 PSI 325.54 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 57058 Quality Aluminum Forge 426.53 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57059 R. W. Beck 976.80 Professional Services P1-90 57060 R. L. Abbott & Associates 3,000.00 Kern County Biosolids Consulting Services 57061 Railmakers, Inc. 40.79 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57062 Rainbow Disposal Co. 5,826.40 Trash Removal 57063 Rainin Instrument, L.L.C. 119.53 Lab Parts & Supplies 57064 Reid Metal Finishing 391.33 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57065 Reliastar Bankers Security Life Ins. 9,925.22 Employee Life Ins. Premium, Short-Term Disability & Cancer Ins. Payroll Deductions 57066 RemedyTemp, Inc. 3,219.66 Temporary Employment Services 57067 Retrofit Parts & Components, Inc. 652.19 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57068 Revere Transducers 512.60 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57069 Ricoh Business System 16.18 Color Copier Lease & Maintenance 57070 Ricoh Electronics #2 6,044.56 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57071 Rigiflex Technology, Inc. 144.72 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57072 RBF Consulting 24,459.69 Engineering Services 2-41 57073 RM Automation c/o RM Controls 97.39 Instrument Supplies 57074 RS Hughes Co, Inc. 50.88 Paint Supplies 57075 RTR Industries, L.LC. 590.10 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57076 S & J Supply Co., Inc. 137.52 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 57077 Safety-Kleen 485.66 Parts Washer Lease & Service 57078 Sancon Engineering, Inc. 3,450.00 Construction - Manhole Raising on Ellis Ave. 57079 Santana Services 19.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57080 Scientific Spray Finishes 80.25 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57081 Scisorek & Sons Flavors, Inc. 1,565.68 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57082 Sechrist Industries Inc. 983.92 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57083 Semicoa 281.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57084 Serrano Water District 660.61 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57085 Shepard Brothers, Inc. 9,272.07 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57086 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 987.84 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57087 Siemens Building Technologies 145.00 Professional Services - Admin Bldg. Automation System 57088 Sierra Spring Water 933.51 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57089 Sioux Honey Assoc Co-op 11,818.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57090 Snap-On Tools, Inc. 148.85 Tools 57091 So California Edison 1,656.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57092 SoftChoice 2,715.04 Software 57093 South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. 3,349.44 Annual Emission, Operation & Misc. Fees 57094 South Coast Circuits, Inc. 654.02 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57095 South Coast Oil Company 193.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57096 Sparkletts 1,522.17 Drinking Water/Cooler Rentals 57097 St. John Knits, Inc. 10,991.48 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57098 Stanley Steamer International, Inc. 510.00 Carpet Cleaning Services 57099 Summit Steel 101.25 Metal 57100 Sunclipse, Inc. / Corru Kraft 21,441.08 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57101 Sunset Ford 81.39 Auto Parts & Service 57102 Sunset Industrial Parts 158.41 Mechanical Supplies

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 7 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57103 Symcas-TSG 1,381.60 SCADA System VAX Service Agreement 57104 South Coast Environmental Co. 7,193.02 Cen Gen Emissions Testing Service 57105 SKC-West, Inc. 832.72 Safety Supplies 57106 SPX Valves & Control 2,265.33 Valves 57107 Tac West, Inc. 2,988.01 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57108 Taormina Industries, Inc. 169.26 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57109 Taormina Industries, Inc. #4 379.31 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57110 Taylor-Dunn 3,995.61 Electric Cart Parts 57111 Teletrac, Inc. 245.00 Monthly Air-Time Service Fee & Software/Hardware Maint. For Vehicle Tracking Sys. 57112 Terminix International Co. #2474 385.00 Pest Control 57113 Tetra Tech, Inc. 2,260.93 Professional Services 7-37 57114 Textron Aerospace 3,847.24 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57115 The Walking Man, Inc. 1,050.00 Public Outreach Program - Bushard Project Door Hangers 57116 Thermal-Vac Technology 9.75 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57117 Thermco Systems, Inc. 996.00 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57118 Thompson Industrial Supply, Inc. 4,914.12 Mechanical Supplies 57119 ThyssenKrupp Elevator 2,321.00 Elevator Maintenance 57120 Tierra Tractor 2,700.00 Tree Planting Services 57121 Times Community News 106.25 Notices & Ads 57122 Tony's Lock & Safe Service & Sales 76.70 Locks & Keys 57123 Townsend Public Affairs 5,000.00 Legislative & Executive Advocate for Grant Funding 57124 Toytoa Racing Development #2 1,560.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57125 Transline Technology, Inc. 27.66 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57126 Trim-Lok 234.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57127 Truck & Auto Supply, Inc. 103.26 Truck & Auto Parts 57128 Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. 50.00 Analysis of Biosolids and Wastewater 57129 City of Tustin Water Service 4,268.41 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57130 Teksystems 20,915.00 Temporary Employment Services 57131 TTM Technologies, Inc. 279.80 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57132 US Filter Corporation 280.00 Service Agreement - Lab Purification System 57133 U.W.M.C. Hospital Corp. - Anaheim 244.19 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57134 Ultra Scientific 122.50 Lab Supplies 57135 Ultra Wheel Company 538.82 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57136 United Circuit Technology 1,173.54 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57137 United Parcel Service 27.19 Parcel Services 57138 Universal Circuits, Inc. 860.64 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57139 The Vantage Group, L.L.C. 12,440.00 Temporary Employment Service 57140 Vapex, Inc. 11,296.00 Instrument Parts, Supplies & Maintenance 57141 Velie Circuits, Inc. 1,003.77 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57142 Vencor, Inc. 8,797.52 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57143 Verne's Plumbing 7,498.25 Service Contract - Backflow Device Repairs & Lab Waterline Repairs 57144 Villa Park Orchards Assoc. 777.88 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57145 VWR Scientific Products Corporation 2,899.95 Lab Supplies 57146 West American Rubber Company 7,666.50 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57147 Weyerhauser Company 20,661.45 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57148 Winonics 1,760.14 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57149 Winonics (Brea) 54.63 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57150 Wintec, L.L.C. 39.18 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 8 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57151 Xerox Corp - OMNI 21.00 Fax Lease 57152 Xerox Corporation 11,620.94 Fax & Copier Leases 57153 Zymark Corporation 10,000.00 Service Agreement - Lab Zymate Robotic System 57154 Deon M. Carrico 298.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57155 Marilyn M. Farnsworth 404.30 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57156 Victoria L. Henn 116.68 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57157 Orange County Sanitation District 911.98 Petty Cash Reimb. 57158 Airgas Safety 305.03 Safety Supplies & Equipment 57159 ASSE American Soc. of Safety Engineers 1,120.00 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57160 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 1,252.58 Telephone Service 57161 American Telephone & Telegraph Corp. 393.27 Telephone Service 57162 AT & T Wireless Services - Airtime 301.92 Cellular Airtime 57163 BNB Engineering, Inc. 1,328.00 Construction 11-22 57164 Carl Warren & Co. 305.65 Insurance Claims Administrator 57165 Center For Urban Infrasructure Comm. 215.00 Air Quality Meeting Registration 57166 Communications Performance Group, Inc. 7,900.00 Prof. Serv. - Develop Chemical Emergency Operating Procedures 57167 Compressor Components of California 5,301.30 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57168 Corporate Express 83.68 Office Supplies 57169 County of Orange - Auditor Controller 33.00 Encroachment Permit 7-36 57170 Court Trustee 69.12 Wage Garnishment 57171 CPI International 748.87 Lab Supplies 57172 CWEA-SARBS, Inc. 65.00 Operations Meeting Registration 57173 Department of Motor Vehicles 127.00 Vehicle Registration 57174 Employee Benefits Specialists, Inc. 7,898.20 Reimbursed Prepaid Employee Medical & Dependent Care 57175 Five Star Metals, Inc. 343.70 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57176 Franchise Tax Board 100.00 Wage Garnishment 57177 Internal Revenue Service 450.00 Wage Garnishment 57178 Jamison Engineering Contractors, Inc. 12,714.30 Professional Services - Removal of Caustic Tank at Scrubbers H & I 57179 League Of CA Cities 435.00 Membership 57180 McMaster-Carr Supply Co. 2,510.56 Plumbing Parts, Supplies & Tools 57181 Midway Mfg & Machining Co. 2,160.39 Professional Services - Install (3) Liners In Air Compressor Cylinders 57182 Mobile Air Conditioning Society 200.00 Membership 57183 Michael D. Moore 224.98 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57184 National Bond & Trust 2,045.44 U.S. Savings Bonds Payroll Deductions 57185 The Orange County Register 11,360.09 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57186 Orange Fluid System Technologies, Inc. 188.24 Plumbing Parts & Supplies 57187 OCEA 580.11 Dues Deduction 57188 Parker Hannifin Corporation 58.43 Regulator Filters 57189 PenValve 224.91 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57190 Platecorp #2 170.96 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57191 Primary Source Office Furnishings, Inc. 10,715.79 Office Furniture 57192 Ricoh Electronics 270.37 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57193 Tod W. Ridgeway 383.75 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57194 Shureluck Sales & Engineering 80.91 Mechanical Parts & Supplies 57195 Society for HR Management 160.00 Membership 57196 South Coast Circuits #4 1,845.49 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57197 Southern California Edison 34.60 Power 57198 Spinitar 25.00 Freight

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 9 of 10 11/10/2003 Claims Paid From 10/16/03 to 10/31/03

Warrant No. Vendor Amount Description 57199 Summit Steel 461.16 Metal 57200 SBC 1,092.63 Telephone Services 57201 United Way 305.00 Employee Contributions 57202 Valverde Construction, Inc. 5,319.14 Construction - Sewerline Repairs at Newport Beach 57203 Verizon California 1,185.81 Telephone Services 57204 Verteq Process Systems 870.06 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57205 Michael J. Barrett 144.26 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57206 Shabbir S. Basrai 137.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57207 Michael J. Boess 297.60 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57208 James M. Elo 167.52 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57209 Darrell S. Ennis 202.65 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57210 Mila S. Kleinbergs 267.80 Acoustic Enclosure for Ultrasonic Test Unit 57211 Matthew P. Smith 1,502.93 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57212 Morris C. Ying 1,893.41 Meeting/Training Expense Reimbursement 57213 Amezcua, Gerardo 2,095.13 Employee Computer Loan Program 57214 Castillo, Mark & Fry's Electronics 1,520.00 Employee Computer Loan Program 57215 McElroy, Tomm 1,214.85 Employee Computer Loan Program 57216 Ralph, Allen 2,064.68 Employee Computer Loan Program 57217 Grande Tortilla 30,414.84 Reconciliation User Fee Refund Program 57218 Orange County Business Council 50,000.00 Membership 57219 Orange County Sanitation District 680,065.30 Payroll EFT Reimbursement 57220 Southern California Edison 139,346.46 Power 57221 Unity Constructors 6,572.30 Construction 7-14-4, Retention Total Accounts Payable - Warrants $ 10,103,534.83

Payroll Disbursements 31393 - 31482 Employee Paychecks$ 143,151.92 Biweekly Payroll 10/29/03 91015 - 91516 Direct Deposit Statements 944,946.00 Biweekly Payroll 10/29/03 Total Payroll Disbursements $ 1,088,097.92

Wire Transfer Payments U.S. Bank$ 178,639.96 October Interest Payment on Series 2000 Certificates of Participation Total Wire Transfer Payments $ 178,639.96

Total Claims Paid 10/16/03 - 10/31/03 $ 11,370,272.71

G:\excel.dta\fin\220\APSHARE\Claims Paid Report\02-03\Claims Paid Report - 103103.xls EXHIBIT B fin/210/lc Page 10 of 10 11/10/2003 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT 9(a) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate

SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-33 – TOVATT ANNEXATION

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

(1) Receive and file petition from Bill Tovatt to annex 1.02 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) near the intersection of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-25, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-33 – Tovatt Annexation).

SUMMARY

• OCSD received a request from Bill Tovatt to annex 1.02 acres to OCSD. This parcel will be connected to an existing OCSD 21-inch sewer on Randall Street.

• This parcel will be annexed to the City of Orange. The property has an existing five-bedroom house with an existing septic system that will be removed after annexation and connection to the OCSD sewer.

• OCSD has collected the sewer inspection and sewer capacity fees for this property.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $9,033.66 includes the following:

LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 350.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD sewer capacity fee existing (5) bedroom home 2,530.00 OCSD sewer inspection fee 500.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee (1.02 acres) $ 3,960.66 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $ 9,033.66

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

N/A

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

Notice of Exemption will be filed.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map

RLC:sa G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\Joint Boards\TovattAnnexation.doc

Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT 9(b) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bob Chenowith, Senior Engineering Associate

SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. OCSD-35 – KIRKLAND ANNEXATION

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

(1) Receive and file petition from Ken Kirkland to annex 0.31 acres to Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) near the intersection of Randall Street and Clark Street in an unincorporated area of Orange County; and (2) Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-26, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to OCSD (Proposed Annexation No. OCSD-35 – Kirkland Annexation).

SUMMARY

• OCSD received a request from Ken Kirkland to annex 0.31 acres to OCSD. This vacant parcel will be annexed to the City of Orange. This is a vacant piece of land.

• The property owner will extend an existing City of Orange sewer up Randall Street to serve this parcel. The property owner will pay all costs to extend this new sewer.

• The City of Orange will collect sewer inspection fees, and the new sewer will be built per City of Orange construction standards. The City of Orange will collect the sewer capacity fees for this property when the property owner acquires building permits in the future.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange regarding A.B.8 Tax Exchange for annexing properties. The Board of Directors approved this action and it became effective March 14, 1989. Under this Tax Exchange, OCSD does not receive a percentage of the basic levy, and instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The fee of $5,876.00 includes the following:

LAFCO Processing Fee $ 1,150.00 OCSD Processing Fee 500.00 State Board of Equalization Processing Fee 300.00 CA Environmental Quality Act Filing Fee 43.00 OCSD Annexation Acreage Fee $ 3,883.00 TOTAL ANNEXATION FEE $ 5,876.00

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

N/A

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

Notice of Exemption will be filed.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Exhibit A Legal Description 2. Exhibit B Map

RLC:sa G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 9(b).Annexation 35.doc

Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. OMTS COMMITTEE 11/5/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT OMTS03-51 12(b) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Robert J. Ooten, Director of Operations and Maintenance Originator: Barbara Collins, Principal Analyst

SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT for CORROSION MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT STUDY, SPECIFICATION NO. CS-2002-80-BD

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Receive and file the Final Report for Corrosion Management Assessment Study, Specification No. CS-2002-80-BD, dated September 2003, prepared by M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc.

SUMMARY

• The District required the services of a corrosion system expert in order to perform an evaluation of the existing District facilities and to provide recommendations for developing a comprehensive corrosion management program

• In April 2002, the District contracted with M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. in association with Villalobos and Associates Consulting Engineers, for the purpose of conducting a Corrosion Control Program Assessment Study of the two treatment plants, interplant pipelines, and the collection systems.

• The assessment study completes the first phase of a three phase effort to implement a corrosion management program and provides the groundwork for the program development and implementation phases.

• The report recommended the following:

- Continue use of materials selection and standard specification and design guidelines for coatings and linings. - Continue use of chemical inhibitors in the trunk sewers and the treatment plants for odor and corrosion control. - Continue to conduct periodic condition assessments of plant and collection systems. - Expanded and extended use of protective coatings (paints, etc.) to control internal pipeline and concrete vessel corrosion. - Implement industry standard corrosion monitoring practices to provide guidance on the effectiveness of inhibitor materials.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).Corrosion Report.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

- Expand the use of cathodic–type corrosion protection systems for metal pipelines and structures. - Over the next seven years, conduct about $6.5 million of facility inspections, studies, and spot repairs as outlined in the assessment report. - Develop a team of technical and field staff assigned to manage the corrosion program and conduct periodic inspections of District facilities. - Make the District’s corrosion program proactive versus reactive in order to reduce overall lifecycle costs. - Develop a cradle to grave approach for capital improvement and new facility planning, design, construction, operations, and decommissioning. - Complete the remaining two phases toward implementing the corrosion management program.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

A consulting services agreement with M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. for the development of a corrosion management program was approved at the March 22, 2002 Board Meeting.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

The recommended consulting services for Phase I of the Corrosion Management Program were estimated to be $145,000, and the project was completed for the estimated amount.

Estimates of the cost savings associated with well developed corrosion control programs on buildings, wastewater structures, pipelines and various other facilities range from $5 to $25 for each $1 expended. Most public agencies that have implemented corrosion control programs quote a savings value of $7 for each $1 spent.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: 32001-02) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).Corrosion Report.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

An Executive Summary of the report is attached. The full report is on file in the Board Secretary’s office and will be posted on the District’s Website @ www.ocsd.com. To request a copy of the full report in CD format, please contact Bob Ooten at 714-593-7020.

ALTERNATIVES

Continue with ongoing operations and maintenance programs that do not optimize corrosion control in the District collection systems and treatment facilities.

CEQA FINDINGS

NA

ATTACHMENTS

Executive Summary – Final Report for Corrosion Management Assessment Study, Specification No. CS-2002-80-BD

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).Corrosion Report.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ATTACHMENT 1

CORROSION MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by: M. J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. – September 2003

The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD or The District) contracted on April 25, 2002 with M.J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. (MJS&A) in association with V&A Consulting Engineers (V&A) for the purpose of conducting a corrosion control program assessment study of the two treatment plants, interplant pipelines, and collections systems throughout Orange County.

Continuous and effective operation of the District's facilities is critical to the health and safety of Orange County's citizens and the local environment. In addition, political and environmental situations have raised the awareness and consequences associated with releases and spills, a few of which have been due to corrosion. Management of corrosion on facilities and assets is a necessary part of the essential public services that the District provides to their customers and stakeholders.

Corrosion management is an essential part of asset management. Once constructed, corrosion is generally the life limiting mechanism for these civil infrastructure assets due to the service life expectations (50 to 100 years). Over the 50+ years that the District has been in operation, the value of the Districts infrastructure assets has increased. The replacement value of the assets of the District was predicted to be $4 Billion by Parsons/GHD in their Asset Management Strategic Plan completed in late 2002. The District has roughly half of that amount in assets at this time ($2 Billion). The additional $2 Billion in assets will be the result of capital improvement projects currently planned.

The overall Corrosion Management Program has been divided into three phases by the District. The goal of the overall program is to implement and maintain a comprehensive Corrosion Management Program from this point forward.

Phase I (this project) is the Programmatic Assessment. The objective of this Phase I project was to assess where the District is in terms of managing corrosion and establish the requirements (strategy, budget and schedule) for the development and implementation of an overall Corrosion Management Program. The project also provides recommendations for the management of the Corrosion Management Program by the District and the staffing requirements to run the program. The recommendations from Phase I project will provide guidance as to recommended schedules and costs for the initiation of the overall corrosion management program and the Phase II assessments on District assets.

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 1 11/13/2003 Phase II will be to conduct the Physical Condition Assessments on Critical Assets identified in Phase I. Phase III will encompass the actual remediation and rehabilitation for implementation for the assets. Once the Phase II assessments are complete, design projects and capital improvements to restore, repair and maintain District assets will be develop as part of Phase III of the program.

Phase I of the project consisted of the following elements:

1. Review Existing Procedures, Guidelines and Documentation

2. Workshops and Interviews with District Field and Management Personnel

3. Field Surveys/Case Study Assessments on Selected District Assets to Determine Effectiveness of Current Corrosion Management/Control Practices

4. Research on Sources of Stray Current within the District Boundaries

5. Development of an Overall Corrosion Control Strategy

6. Development and Presentation of Corrosion Management Program Options

7. Description of Recommended Corrosion Control Program/Model and Phase II Projects

8. Preparation of a Report of Findings and Recommendations for 5-year Planning Horizon

The following is a summary of observations and conclusions of the Study/Assessment:

The District’s approach to corrosion control has, in the past, been addressed on a piecemeal or project by project basis. The present form of the “management” of the corrosion control program has resulted in unpredictable and uncontrolled failures in various systems. Currently and historically, the District’s corrosion control program has been driven by responses to incidents or urgent needs, rather than systematically identifying and managing of the District’s facilities, assets and resources. What is needed is a holistic, comprehensive corrosion control program to improve control, prevention and prediction of corrosion. Such a program would look at District facilities from a financing, planning, design, operation and maintenance and final disposal or replacement point of view.

From a technical standpoint rather than a management standpoint, there are some very good things that OCSD has done and continues to do to minimize corrosion damage when compared to other wastewater utilities. These include:

• Use of materials selection and standard specifications/design guidelines, coatings/linings

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 2 11/13/2003 • Inhibitors for odor and corrosion control

• Periodic condition assessments of plant and collection system assets

These practices have prevented corrosion in the past at the District and will continue to be an important part of the corrosion control program along with other aspects. It is the opinion of the project team based on our review of the District’s practices that the following would significantly improve corrosion management and control at the District:

• Expanded and extended use of inhibitors to control internal corrosion. Inhibitors are a cost effective methods (perhaps the only way) to prevent internal corrosion on existing structures both in the collection systems and plant facilities, continued and expanded use of inhibitors with monitoring for their effectiveness on reducing corrosion damage is warranted.

• Implement internal and external corrosion monitoring practices using existing technology used in other industries (oil & gas). This will expedite the District’s goals for establishing inhibitor treatment procedures and practices by providing feedback on inhibitor effectiveness and persistence under actual collection system and plant system conditions.

• Programmed maintenance repairs on existing and accessible lining systems.

• Capital improvement projects (CIP) on existing coating/lining systems

• Application of cathodic protection to critical metallic pipelines in the collection system and plant piping. Unfortunately, the District’s previous practice of installing metallic pipelines, particularly ductile iron pipe (DIP), without intentional electrical bonding will be a major source of external corrosion management problems in the future when cathodic protection is necessary to extend the life of these assets in the collection system.

• There needs to be improved District/personal ownership of the corrosion control efforts. The District needs to make a commitment to corrosion control and management. As long as the District is in existence, a corrosion control program will be required. Further, as the District’s assets age, corrosion management will be more important as part of integrated asset management and asset life extension programs. A successful corrosion control program must have these elements. This approach has proven to be the successful for other public entities.

• From an organizational standpoint, the Project team believes that the operations and maintenance department is the appropriate place for corrosion management to be located. Coordination will be required with engineering, planning, and asset management, but ultimately the responsibility and focus of corrosion management should be in the O&M Department.

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 3 11/13/2003

• The first step in developing improved ownership will be to establish a single point of contact for corrosion management and responsibility at the District. This person would be responsible for coordinating the efforts of District personnel, contractors, consultants and others. It is more important for this person to be familiar with wastewater operations and District facilities/procedures than be an expert in any one or all areas of corrosion control. In particular, the person will have to coordinate efforts between departments since assessments and condition tracking are largely the responsibility of Operations and Maintenance and the development and execution of CIP projects to improve the condition of the assets is the responsibility of engineering.

• In order to jump start the program, the efforts and attention of the corrosion manager should not be divided, particularly in the early stages of the developing program (3 to 5 years). The plan should be to increase District resources during this period to develop a core of group (manager with two engineers and a technician). Once the core is established, consultants and contractors could be used to supplement District staff as needed to meet the needs of construction, operations and maintenance projects.

• The reactive type of corrosion management program lacks focus and consistency and is expensive and environmentally risky, since problems are dealt with in an emergency fashion. Becoming proactive versus reactive will decrease overall lifecycle costs. One method for managing corrosion that is gaining favor in both municipal and for-profit business is to prioritize decisions based on risk. Risk is the product of likelihood (probability) and consequence for a given event. This project begins the process of a Corrosion Control Program based on corrosion risk management for the Districts assets.

Initial projects for Phases II and III were developed, budgets provided and schedules identified. While the scope for this Phase I study was not intended to produce projects for Phase III, the projects identified for Phase III were obvious from our investigation and are necessary to be underway as soon as possible to improve and control corrosion in critical District facilities. The total estimated cost for the listed Phase II and Phase III projects described is approximately $6.5 Million. In addition, the Phase II assessments and programs will develop and require additional Phase III projects (and more similar Phase II type projects) to be planned and budgeted.

The following is a summary of the how the recommended Phase II and III projects breakdown by categories:

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 4 11/13/2003 Table 1: Summary of Recommended Costs by Category

Category of Expense Estimated Cost $M

Repairs Previously 2.40 Recommended by Studies

Collection Systems 2.00 Assessments and Studies

Overhaul of Design Guidelines 0.10 and Standard Specs

GIS Coordination of Corrosion 0.25 and Condition Assessment Information

Training of OCSD Staff and 0.20 Personnel

On Call Repairs During Planned 0.45 Assessments

Outfall Monitoring 0.10

On-call Consulting Services and 0.40 Services on Program Start-up

Contingencies on Construction 0.60 Costs

Total 6.5

The projects in Phase II and Phase III are the beginning of a process. It will probably take the District 7 to 10 years to “catch up” on deferred maintenance and engineering related to corrosion. If the District makes and maintains the commitment, then the benefits will accumulate each and every year forward. Estimates of the cost savings for corrosion control programs on civil engineering infrastructure range from $5 to $25 for each $1 expended, with the most often quoted value of $7 saving for each $1 spent. Assuming this leverage, the $6.5M spent on corrosion in the next 5 years will save $45.5M. The path forward is first to change the District culture towards corrosion as an inevitable cost of doing business and to better utilize District resources (personnel, standards, policies and procedures) and external resources to minimize corrosion risk and maintain the net asset value of the District’s facilities. This phase of the program provided a framework and samples for development of a holistic rather than project orientation for

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 5 11/13/2003 corrosion control. The concepts and plans put forth as a result of this project have proven to be the successful path forward for other public entities. Ultimately, personal responsibility and accountability for corrosion asset management as well as other forms of asset management and protection are in order to improve the overall asset life and performance. It will be necessary to make a cultural and paradigm shift in order meet the needs of the corrosion program.

Corrosion Management Assessment Study Participants Specification No. CS-2002-80BD

Consultants Orange County Sanitation District

M.J. Schiff & Associates, Inc. (Alphabetical Order) Graham Bell, P.E. Blake Anderson Kerri Howell, PE Nick Arhontes Eric Frechette, EIT Shabbir Basrai Adrineh Avedisian Brian Bingman Robert Pannell Patrick Carnahan V&A Consulting Engineers, Inc. William Cassidy Jose Villalobos, PE Chris Cervellone Paul Sciuto, PE Doug Cooke Glenn Willson, PE Mark Esquer Kevin Krajewski John Finias John Gonzalez Tod Haynes Dave Heinz Vicki Henn Deirdre Hunter Terry Krie David Ludwin Mike McCusker Peter Morrison Bob Ooten Jeff Peterson Ed Ratledge Ed Torres Mike Vuong Marcopolo Velasco Rod Wade Simon Watson Chuck Winsor Ernest Yeboah

OCSD/810/PJ G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 12(b).1.doc 6 11/13/2003 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/05/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-81 13(b) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Bud Palmquist, Senior Engineer

SUBJECT: REHABILITATION OF 36-INCH FORCEMAIN (B) BETWEEN BITTER POINT PUMP STATION AND JUNCTION BOX, CONTRACT NO. 5-29-R1

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

(1) Ratify Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation of 36-inch Forcemain (B) Between Bitter Point Pump Station and Junction Box, Contract No. 5-29-R1, with Insituform Technologies, Inc., authorizing a deduction of $15,529, decreasing the total contract amount to $1,536,941; and (2) Accept Contract No. 5-29-R1 as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement.

SUMMARY

Background

• This project includes the rehabilitation of the section of Forcemain (B) of the Pacific Coast Highway Forcemain System between Bitter Point Pump Station and the junction structure adjacent to the Santa Ana River, the installation of cured in place pipe lining (CIPP) in a portion of an existing 42-inch siphon under the Santa Ana River, the preservation of 4,600 feet of existing 24-inch Forcemain (C) with a slurry coating to prevent corrosion, and the abandonment of 2,000 feet of an existing 24- inch ductile iron force main.

• Lee & Ro, Inc. prepared the plans and specifications in October, 2002, and the contract was awarded to Insituform Technologies, Inc. on November 20, 2002. • This change order is for the Adjustment of Engineers Quantities. There are no errors and omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $750 per day and there are no bonus provisions.

Contract Schedule

Contract Start Date February 3, 2003 Original Contract Completion Date August 1, 2003 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 1 Current Contract Completion Date August 1, 2003 Actual Completion Date August 1, 2003 Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

Change Order Content

Item Description Amount Days Type 1 Adjustment of Engineer’s Quantities ($15,529) 0 Other

Total Change Order No. 1 ($15,529) 0

Please see the attached Change Order for additional information.

Job Completion

The project is 100% complete.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on November 20, 2002.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Original Contract Price $1,552,470 Previously Authorized Changes $0.00 This Change $(15,529) Change Orders to Date $(15,529) Percentage Decrease to Date (1.00%) Amended Contract Price $1,536,941

Funds will need to be reallocated from the Construction Phase to cover the expenditures to date for the Preliminary Design, Commissioning, and Close-Out Phases. The total budget of $1,996,000 will not change.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (FY 2003/2004: Section 8, Page 17) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

None

ALTERNATIVES

None

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2

CEQA FINDINGS

This project is covered in the previously approved Master Plan/EIR. The project is exempt per CEQA Guideline Sections 15301(b) (d) 15303(d), and 15304 for Collection Facilities Engineering Projects. The Notice of Exemption was filed on August 6, 2002 with the County of Orange.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order

BP:lc

G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\5-29-R1 CO1COA Agenda Report110503.doc

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE REHABILITATION OF 36-INCH FORCEMAIN (B) BETWEEN BITTERPOINT PUMP STATION AND JUNCTION BOX CONTRACT NO. 5-29-R1

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development $ - $ -

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 8,323 $ 8,323 $ 1,000 $ 7,323 $ 8,323 $ 8,323

Phase 3 - Design $ 151,000 $ 151,000 $ 151,000 $ 99,000 $ 99,000 $ 95,815

Phase 4 - Construction $ 1,770,000 $ 1,770,000 $ (14,927) $ 1,755,073 $ 1,770,000 $ (14,927) $ 1,755,073 $ 1,701,230

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 4,274 $ 7,274 $ 3,000 $ 4,274 $ 7,274 $ 7,274

Phase 6 - Close-Out $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,330 $ 5,330 $ 3,000 $ 2,330 $ 5,330 $ 5,330

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ 69,000 $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ 1,996,000 $ 1,996,000 $ - $ 1,996,000 $ 1,876,000 $ (1,000) $ 1,875,000 $ 1,817,972

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ 1,996,000 $ 1,996,000 $ - $ 1,996,000 $ 1,876,000 $ (1,000) $ 1,875,000 $ 1,817,972

PSA/Contract

Design PSA $ 50,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000 $ 59,290 $ - $ 59,290 $ 59,100 Construction Contract $ 1,740,000 $ 1,592,470 $ 1,592,470 $ 1,552,470 $ (15,529) $ 1,536,941 $ 1,383,598 REHABILITATION OF 36-INCH FORCEMAIN (B) BETWEEN BITTER POINT PUMP STATION AND JUNCTION BOX CONTRACT NO. 5-29-R1

PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST ITEM INCREASE TIME TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)

CONTRACT 2/3/2003$ 1,552,470.00 $ 1,552,470.00 0.00% 180 180 CO NO. 1 Pending$ (15,529.00) $ 1,536,941.00 -1.00% 0 180

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-82 13(c) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Dean Fisher, Senior Engineer

SUBJECT: PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES, JOB NO. P1-37

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Ratify Change Order No. 10 to Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37, with Margate Construction, authorizing an addition of $56,041, increasing the total contract amount to $71,198,134.

SUMMARY

Background

• Job Number P1-37, Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, includes the construction of 16 new primary clarifiers with all support equipment, improvements to existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15, and improvements to Primary Clarifiers 1-5. • Brown and Caldwell prepared the plans and specifications and the contract was awarded to Margate Construction on October 24, 2001. • This change order includes 11 items of additional work, and 2 items of deleted work. There are no errors and 4 omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this project are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions.

Contract Schedule

Contract Start Date January 7, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date November 7, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 10 Current Contract Completion Date April 8, 2006 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages 0

Page 1 Change Order Content

Item Description Amount Days Type 1 Security Barricades 934 0 Other 2 Sludge Collector Structural Support 1,757 0 Design Change 3 Influent Channel Opening 7,899 0 Design Change 4 Top Deck Structural Connections 5,758 0 Omission 5 PVC Ball Valve Operators 0 0 Omission 6 Drain Line Connection (-2,200) 0 Design Change 7 Station Battery Upgrade 4,825 0 Design Change 8 Centerfeed Channel Shoring 1,515 0 Omission 9 Power Building 7 Exterior Finish (-6,576) 0 Design Change 10 Dilute Sludge Pump Motor Cables 5,136 0 Omission 11 Unsuitable Materials Removal 13,452 0 Changed Condition 12 Power Bldg 7 Paving and Drainage 17,960 0 Design Change 13 Paving Modifications 5,581 0 Changed Condition Total Change Order $56,041 0

Job Completion

The project is 60% complete.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on October 24, 2001. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for more information on previous change orders.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000 Previously Authorized Changes $ 776,093 This Change $ 56,041 Change Orders to Date $ 832,134 Percentage Increase to Date 1.18 % Amended Contract Price $ 71,198,134

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, CIP, P1-37) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

Page 2

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

None.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are proposed.

CEQA FINDINGS

This project was included in the Strategic Plan EIR that was certified on October 27, 1999. A Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order

GC:ms G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\P1-37 AR 092503.doc

Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Primary Clarifiers No. 16-31 and Related Facilities Job No. P1-37

ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE TO EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION DATE TO DATE(%)

Phase 1 - Project Development $ 77,000 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 $ 77,000 $ 76,974 100%

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 315,000 $ 315,000 $ 315,000 $ 315,000 $ 315,552 100%

Phase 3 - Design $ 4,542,000 $ 4,542,000 $ 4,542,000 $ 4,542,000 $ 4,546,501 100%

Phase 4 - Construction $ 77,487,935 $ 56,041 $ 77,543,976 $ 77,487,935 * $ 56,041 $ 77,543,976 $ 43,399,983 * 56%

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ 281,880 $ 281,880 $ -

Phase 6 - Closeout $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ -

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 5,807,185 $ (56,041) $ 5,751,144 $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ - $ 88,561,000 $ - $ 88,561,000 $ 82,421,935 $ 56,041 $ 82,477,976 $ 48,339,010 59%

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ - $ 88,561,000 $ - $ 88,561,000 $ 82,421,935 $ 56,041 $ 82,477,976 $ 48,339,010 59%

PSA/Contract

Design PSA $ 5,205,904 $ 5,205,904 $ 5,205,904 $ 5,205,904 $ 4,570,221 88%

Construction Contract $ 71,142,093 $ 56,041 $ 71,198,134 $ 71,142,093 $ 56,041 $ 71,198,134 $ 35,217,897 49%

* Note: Authorized Funds and Expenditures to Date in Phase 4 include Construction Administration and Inspection costs from previous phasing prior to 7/1/03.

CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT

PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 16-31 AND RELATED FACILITIES

JOB NO. P1-37

AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST PERCENTAGE ITEM TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE INCREASE (DAYS) (DAYS)

CONTRACT 6/23/1999$ 70,366,000.00 $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 1400 1400 CO NO. 1 12/19/2001$ - $ 70,366,000.00 0.00 0 1400 * CO NO. 2 8/1/2002$ 75,214.00 $ 70,441,214.00 0.11 49 1449 ** CO NO. 3 10/21/2002$ 48,736.00 $ 70,489,950.00 0.18 0 1449 CO NO. 4 12/18/2002$ 356,059.00 $ 70,846,009.00 0.68 82 1531 CO NO. 5 2/26/2003$ 33,527.00 $ 70,879,536.00 0.73 0 1531 CO NO. 6 4/23/2003$ 54,992.00 $ 70,934,528.00 0.81 21 1552 CO NO. 7 6/25/2003$ 14,750.00 $ 70,949,278.00 0.83 0 1552 CO NO. 8 8/27/2003$ 5,363.00 $ 70,954,641.00 0.84 0 1552 CO NO. 9 10/22/2003$ 187,452.00 $ 71,142,093.00 1.10 0 1552 CO NO. 10 Pending$ 56,041.00 $ 71,198,134.00 1.18 0 1552

* Approved by PDC Committee per delegated authority by Board Resolution 99-23 ** Approved by General Manager per delagated authority by Board Resolution 99-23

Page 1 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $56,041.00

In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 – SECURITY BARRICADES This item provided temporary vehicle security barricades at Plant 1. Several concrete “K” rail barricades were installed at (5) entry gates on 3/20/03, 4/02/03, and 5/21/03. This work was not included in the contract, and was requested by District security personnel for compliance with threat level “Orange” warnings issued by the US Department of Homeland Security. The work was accomplished on contractor’s force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-72). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $934.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 – SLUDGE COLLECTOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT This item provides additional structural support for the Primary Clarifiers 16-31 sludge collector drive mechanisms. Stainless steel plates embedded in the clarifier walls support the collector drives. For each plate, (2) 4” x 3/8” stainless steel bolts and (4) 12”x 3/8” stainless steel bolts were welded to the embed portion of the plates, for a total of (32) 4” bolts and (64) 12” bolts. Staff determined that this additional anchorage was warranted as added insurance at a minimal cost. The work was accomplished on contractor’s force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-78). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,757.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 – INFLUENT CHANNEL OPENING This item modifies the detail specified for sealing (2) existing 60-inch openings in the invert of the east and west Influent channels. The specified design provided a concrete fill with waterstop. This change adds a stainless steel plate and gasket. Staff recommends this design enhancement in order to avoid the possibility of leakage between the wet influent channels and the dry galleries below. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-113). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,899.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

ITEM 4 – TOP DECK STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS This item provides additional concrete reinforcement associated with the connection of the proposed Primary Clarifiers 16-31 to the existing Primary Clarifiers 6-15 top deck. It was not possible to construct this connection as shown on the plans. The angle between the existing top deck slope and the new deck slope prevented insertion of the reinforcing steel into the existing couplers, and the existing couplers did not match the size of dowels required by the plans. The work includes butt welding of splice bars, added threaded dowels, and field cutting dowels. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-121). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,758.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 – PVC BALL VALVE OPERATORS This item replaces the specified PVC ball valve operators and their associated electrical circuits. This change is necessary in order to provide the appropriate operators to the specified valves. The operators originally specified have a minimum torque output of 380 ft-lbs, while the specified ball valves are designed for only 3 to 33 ft-lbs. Replacing the operator with a lighter-duty model also required a power circuit change from 480 volts to 120 volts. The originally specified operator was supplied with an integral control panel, but the lighter duty operator is not, and requires the purchase and installation of an additional panel. The net results of the changes in this item is no additional cost to the Contract. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-124). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6 – DRAIN LINE CONNECTION This item provides a credit to change the location of the specified chemical area drain line connection to the existing sewer. The specified design provided a new 6" line connecting to the existing Waste Side Stream sewer manhole at the intersection of North Perimeter Road and Fuentes Road. This alternate connects to the existing 8" polymer facility drain line south of the new construction. This change reduces disruption to Plant operations and eliminates costs associated with excavation, shoring, paving, sidewalk, and curb and gutter replacement. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-125). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(2,200.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

ITEM 7 – STATION BATTERY UPGRADE This item provides a maintenance free station battery in Power Building #7, in lieu of the specified battery. This change was requested by the District Operations department in order to reduce future costs associated with battery maintenance. This upgrade eliminates the need for monitoring and maintenance of liquid levels in the batteries, and provides a battery with a longer service life. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-128). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,825.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 – CENTERFEED CHANNEL SHORING This item provides modifications to shoring at the north end of the Phase 1 Centerfeed Channel. This work is required in order to eliminate conflicts between Phase 1 conduit installation and shoring supporting the new centerfeed channel. The shoring supports a cantilevered portion of the new centerfeed channel, and must remain until Phase 2 improvements are completed. This requirement was not specified in the Contract Documents. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-130). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,515.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9 – POWER BUILDING 7 EXTERIOR FINISH This item modifies the exterior finish of Power Building 7 from the specified Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) to a stucco finish. This change provides a more durable and impact resistant finish at a lower cost to the District, and also will match the finish of the similar existing buildings at the District. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-132). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(6,576.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10 – DILUTE SLUDGE PUMP MOTOR CABLES This item changes the size of power cables for each of the (6) dilute sludge pumps from #8 AWG to #4 AWG. Per the National Electric Code (NEC), the minimum size cable for the 50 horsepower pumps is #4. The plans specified #8. This change is necessary for compliance with codes regarding equipment safety, and was discovered prior to the ordering of the specified cables. The costs associated with this Change Order item were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 48 (B) 1 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-133). Page 4 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,136.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 – UNSUITABLE MATERIALS REMOVAL This item provides for the removal of 18-inches of undisclosed unsuitable soils below the proposed chemical facility, and replacement with select material. The soils consultant determined that the material was unsuitable, and recommended replacement with select material. The work was accomplished on contractor’s force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-90). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,452.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12 – POWER BUILDING 7 PAVING AND DRAINAGE This item modifies the paving and drainage around Power Building #7 to provide a uniform ground surface. The installation of an electrical vault next to an existing drainage basin created uneven ground surfaces and a potential vehicular hazard. To improve this condition, the basin was moved 30 feet north of it’s original location, allowing the surrounding area to be raised. This additional paving provided a uniform finished surface between the existing paving, the drainage basin, the vault manholes, and the building. This change includes approximately 1,000 SF of additional paving, (1) new 3’x3’ drainage basin, (30) feet of 8-inch PVC pipe, and a connection to the existing drainage system. The work was accomplished on contractor’s force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-98, FCO-P137-106). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $17,960.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 13 –PAVING MODIFICATIONS This item provides additional asphalt removal and base related to joining existing pavement sections in Fuentes Road. During construction, it was discovered that the existing pavement section was thicker than anticipated. The specifications require sawcutting and removal of the existing pavement edge in order to provide a uniform surface for joining the new pavement. Because of the existing pavement was thicker than anticipated, there was more material to remove and more base needed in order to bring the foundation up to the subgrade level. The work was accomplished on contractor’s force account pursuant to Section 48 (B) 2 of the General Requirements (Reference FCO-P137-116). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5,581.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days

TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $56,041.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 5 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.

SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME

Original Contract Date: January 7, 2002 Original Contract Time: 1,400 Days Original Completion Date: November 7,2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Days Total Contract Time Extension: 152 Days Revised Contract Time: 1552 Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 8, 2006 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: N/A Actual Final Completion Date: N/A

Original Contract Price $ 70,366,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 776,093.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 56,041.00 Amended Contract Price $ 71,198,134.00 Page 6 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Ten (10) Date: November 19, 2003 Job: Primary Clarifiers 16-31 and Related Facilities, Job No. P1-37 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell

Board Authorization Date: November 19, 2003

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

Recommended by:

______John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager

Approved by:

______David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering

Accepted by:

MARGATE CONSTRUCTION

______Contractor Date

EDMS/003755733 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/2003 11/19/2003 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-83 Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Julian Sabri, Engineer

SUBJECT: AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PLANT NOS. 1 and 2, JOB NO. J-35-2

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Ratify Change Order No. 4 to Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2, with J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., authorizing an addition of $197,094, increasing the total contract amount to $14,731,356.

SUMMARY

Background • This project upgrades Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to comply with the National Electrical Code (NEC) by utilizing NFPA 820 Standard. The work includes modification of ventilation systems to meet the code requirements, replacement or modification of electrical systems, installation of a fire alarm system in the tunnels, and replacement/ relocation of digester and natural gas piping.

• The plans and specifications were prepared by Parsons/Lee & Ro and the contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction, Inc., on June 26, 2002.

• Change Order No. 4 includes three items of added work. There are no errors and three omissions associated with this change order. Liquidated damages on this contract are $3,000 per day and there are no bonus provisions.

Contract Schedule

Contract Start Date September 16, 2002 Original Contract Completion Date June 17, 2005 Total Number of Change Orders to Date 4 Current Contract Completion Date June 17, 2005 Actual Completion Date N/A Days Subject to Liquidated Damages N/A

Page 1

Change Order No. 4 Content

Item Description Amount Days Type No. 1 Electrical Modifications at Plant No. 1 $91,041 0 Omission 2 Electrical Modifications at Plant No. 2 10,123 0 Omission 3 Mechanical/Structural Modifications 95,930 0 Omission at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Total – Change Order No. 4 $197,094 0

Item 1 includes added explosion proof conduit seals, junction boxes, conduit and fittings that were not shown on the contract documents. These items were necessary to bring the conduit system into compliance with NFPA 820 (National Fire Protection Association) code. Item 3 modifies roof pads and adds supports for new roof-mounted ventilation fans at digester pump rooms and clarifiers. After field observations, during the construction phase, the design consultant determined that additional supports were required to reinforce the existing concrete roofs, to account for the holes that were cut for the new HVAC duct penetrations.

Job Completion

This project is now 53% complete.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

The contract was awarded by the Board of Directors on June 26, 2002. Please refer to the attached Change Order Status Report for information on all previous change orders.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Original Contract Price $ 14,066,442 Previously Authorized Changes $ 467,820 This Change $ 197,094 Change Orders to Date $ 664,913 Percentage Increase to Date 4.73% Final Contract Price $ 14,731,356

Funds for this change order will be transferred form Phase-3 (Design) to Phase-4 (Construction).

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

Page 2

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

None

ALTERNATIVES

None

CEQA FINDINGS

This project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. Change Order Status Report 3. Change Order 4. Location and Photo Description of Change Order

JBF:dm G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-35-2 CO #4 AR.doc

Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE AREA CLASSIFICATION STUDY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PLANT NOS. 1 & 2 JOB NO. J-35-2

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development $ 106,000 $ - $ 106,000 $ 106,000 $ 106,000 100%

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 682,000 $ - $ 682,000 $ - $ 682,000 $ 682,000 100%

Phase 3 - Design $ 3,745,000 $ 4,837,000 $ (2,532,000) $ 2,305,000 $ 2,305,000 $ 2,305,000 $ 2,286,508 99%

Phase 4 - Construction $ 21,307,170 $ 14,689,000 $ 2,532,000 $ 17,221,000 $ 14,689,000 $ 2,532,000 $ 17,221,000 $ 8,826,714 51%

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ 281,328 $ 281,000 $ - $ 281,000 $ - $ -

Phase 6 - Close-Out $ 70,332 $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 $ - $ -

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 3,153,170 $ 1,406,000 $ 1,406,000 $ - $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ 29,345,000 $ 21,283,000 $ - $ 21,283,000 $ 17,782,000 $ 2,532,000 $ 20,314,000 $ 11,901,222 59%

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ 29,345,000 $ 21,283,000 $ - $ 21,283,000 $ 17,782,000 $ 2,532,000 $ 20,314,000 $ 11,901,222 59%

PSA/Contract

Design PSA $ 3,411,411 $ 3,411,411 $ 3,411,411 $ 3,411,411 $ - $ 3,411,411 $ 3,019,281 89%

Construction Contract $ 14,066,442 $ 14,534,262 $ 197,094 $ 14,731,356 $ 14,534,262 $ 197,094 $ 14,731,356 $ 7,818,499 53% CHANGE ORDER STATUS REPORT

Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2 Job No. J-35-2

PERCENTAGE AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED TIME APPROVAL CONTRACT CONTRACT COST ITEM INCREASE TIME TO DATE DATE COST TO DATE (CUMULATIVE) (DAYS) (DAYS)

CONTRACT 9/16/2002$ 14,066,442.00 $ 14,066,442.00 0.00% 1006 1006 CO NO. 1* 5/1/2003$ 115,280.00 $ 14,181,722.00 0.82% 0 1006 CO NO. 2* 9/4/2003$ 83,195.00 $ 14,264,917.00 1.41% 0 1006 CO NO. 3 10/22/2003$ 269,345.00 $ 14,534,262.00 3.33% 0 1006 CO NO. 4 Pending$ 197,094.00 $ 14,731,356.00 4.73% 0 1006 * Approval by PDC Committee per Delegated Authority By Board Resolution 99-23

Page 1 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $197,094.00

In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.

ITEM 1 – ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1

The Contractor was directed to furnish labor, materials and install electrical modifications that meet classified area requirements and were not shown on the contract documents. A summary of the items and associated costs is as follows:

Item Quantity Cost Reference a) Add receptacle seals on the main floor and basement of the gas compressor basement. 6 $ 1,702 FCO No. 10 b) Change conduit fittings, boxes, devices to explosion proof and replace conductors on the main floor of the gas compressor building. varied items 17,258 FCO No. 15 c) Research conduits and conductors at primary sedimentation basins 1 and 2 to determine area classification requirements. The conduit systems were not shown on the contract drawings. varied items 4,027 FCO No. 41 d) Add explosion proof seals and flex conduit at sedimentation basins 1 and 2. The dome/cover areas were not shown on the contract drawings. varied items 15,483 FCO No. 43 e) Research existing conduits and conductors at primary clarifiers 3, 4, and 5 to determine area classification requirements. The conduit systems were not shown on the contract drawings. varied items 5,398 FCO No. 55 f) Add explosion proof seals to ¾” and 1” conduits on the top deck of the grit chambers. The conduits were not shown on the contract documents to be upgraded to the new area classification. 10 7,444 FCO No. 77 g) Add conductors at primary sedimentation basins 1 and 2. The contract drawings did not show the correct number of conductors and sizes to be replaced. 9,125 LF 16,797 FCO No. 78 h) Add additional 1 ½” control conduit and conductors between the RIO panel and MCC CGA at the gas compressor building. This was not shown on the contract documents. 13,000 LF 20,484 FCO No. 87

Page 2 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

Item Quantity Cost Reference i) Relocate ¾” conduit and conductors on the side of The precast bridge between digesters 9 & 10. 20 LF 2,448 FCO No. 127

This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01.

ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $91,041.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days

ITEM 2 – ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2

The Contractor was directed to furnish labor, materials and install electrical modifications that meet classified area requirements and were not shown on the contract documents.

A summary of the items and associated costs is as follows:

Item Quantity Cost Reference a) Relocate new programmable logic controller (PLC) in power building 3A control room. The location shown on the contract drawings was already occupied by existing equipment. 1 $ 2,948 FCO No. 52 b) Relocate lighting control panel “LCPU” from digester L&M outside the MCC room. It was necessary to Relocate the lighting panel to provide space for a new remote input output (RIO) cabinet. 1 7,175 FCO No. 86

This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01.

ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $10,123.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days

Page 3 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

ITEM 3 – MECHANICAL/STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2

The Contractor was directed to furnish labor, materials and install mechanical and structural modifications that meet classified area requirements and were not shown on the contract documents. A summary of the items and associated costs is as follows:

Item Quantity Cost Reference a) Modify existing bridge between digesters O and T to install new digester gas pipe supports at Plant No. 2. 1 $ 1,442 FCO No. 4 b) Furnish and install panic door hardware on seven new fiberglass doors located at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. 7 1,657 FCO No. 6 c) Reroute new gas piping on the roof of digester 15, to not exceed maximum pipe support height at Plant No. 1. 1 2,066 FCO No. 42 d) Coat fan wheels for corrosion protection on 4 HVAC heat pumps located at Plants 1 and 2. 4 3,174 FCO No. 81 e) Add platform extensions to increase landing area on each side of bridge No. 1 on digester 11 at Plant No. 1. 2 5,716 FCO No. 83 f) Furnish and install hatch with support frame and modify ladder at digesters E&H and I&J pump rooms at Plant No. 2. 2 4,575 FCO No. 108 g) Furnish water resistant wall board for partitions in locations shown on the contract drawings at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Process areas require water resistant wall board. all locations 443 FCO No. 133 h) Modify side mounted pipe supports on digesters E&F at Plant No. 2, to avoid interference with the existing walkway. 7 581 FCO No. 134 i) Modify fan roof pads and roof supports at digester pump rooms, electrical rooms, metering and diversion structure, bin loading, and primary clarifiers at Plant No. 1. 7 19,764 FCO No. 137 j) Modify fan roof pads and roof supports at digester pump rooms and clarifier pump rooms at Plant No. 2. 12 31,815 FCO No. 138 k) Modify entry wall and railing at digester I&J pump room at Plant No. 2. 1 (207) FCO No. 157 l) Relocate bridge No. 4 and reduce width on digesters E&H, due to conflict with new digester pipe lines at Plant No. 2. 1 9,040 FCO No. 162 m) Construct concrete filter pads for air supply filters located on digesters C&D and F&G and primary clarifiers L&M and P&Q at Plant No. 2. Filter pads were not shown on the contract drawings 4 3,289 FCO No. 174 Page 4 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

Item Quantity Cost Reference n) Change overflow box caulked seals to welded flange box connections at digesters C,D,E,F,H,J,L,M, and P at Plant No. 2. Overflow boxes were shown as concrete on the contract drawings but were actually constructed of stainless steel. These boxes were changed on a recent project which was not completed at the bid time of this project. 9 4,338 FCO No. 182 o) Furnish and install 2 additional steel support beams and connections at the gas compressor building at Plant No. 2. The new support beams were not shown on the contract drawings and were added to provide additional support for installation on new gas piping on the roof. 2 8,237 FCO No. 185

This additional work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 43 (B) 1) of the General Requirements, Division 01.

ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $95,930.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days

TOTAL COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $197,094.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days

Page 5 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.

SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME

Original Contract Date: September 16, 2002 Original Contract Time: 1,006 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 17, 2005 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 0 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable

Original Contract Price $ 14,066,442.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 467,820.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 197,094.00 Amended Contract Price $ 14,731,356.00

Page 6 of 6

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127

CHANGE ORDER

Contractor: J.F. Shea Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 19, 2003

Job: Area Classification Study Implementation Plan, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-35-2 Consultant: Parsons/Lee & Ro

Board of Directors Authorization Date: November 19, 2003

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

Submitted by:

______John D. Linder, P.E. Date Construction Manager

Approved by:

______David A. Ludwin, P.E. Date Director of Engineering

Accepted by:

J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC.

______Contractor Date

EDMS 003755558 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-86 Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Pam Koester, Project Manager

SUBJECT: Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

(1) Approve a budget Amendment of $4,222,000 for Long Term Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, for a project budget of $7,074,000; and (2) Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with ADS Environmental Services for additional flow monitoring and analysis for an additional amount of $125,000, increasing the total amount not to exceed $6,337,400.

SUMMARY

• The Orange County Sanitation District (District) initiated a comprehensive program to reduce wet weather flows caused by rain dependent infiltration and inflow (I/I) as part of the implementation of the District’s Strategic Plan. One of the key elements of this program was the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2.

• The Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, consists of locating flow meters throughout the District to monitor flows on a continuous basis for a period of five years. A Professional Services Agreement (PSA) was awarded to ADS Environmental Services (ADS) by the District’s Board of Directors on October 25, 2000, in the amount of $6,187,400 to perform the flow monitoring activities. This contract was subsequently increased by $25,000 to $6,212,400 by Amendment No. 1, as shown in the attached PSA Status Report.

• During the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) validation process last fall, the “costs to date” of $4,220,000 were inadvertently left out of the project budget and only the future costs were included.

• In order to complete this project in accordance with its objectives, it is requested that the current budget be increased by $4,222,000, from $2,852,000 back to the original budget amount of $7,074,000.

• As part of the Program, it is necessary to remove and reinstall meters when sewers need to be cleaned. In addition, there are times when meters need to be relocated to get better data. It is requested that $125,000 be added to ADS’s contract to pay for such activities as they occur. This would increase their fee from $6,212,400 to $6,337,400.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(e). J-73-2.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

April 24, 2002- Board of Directors approval of a sole source purchase order to AT&T in the amount of $165,000 for phone services related to the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

See the attached Budget Information Table. Approval is being requested to increase the project budget by $4,222,000 from $2,852,000 back to the original project budget amount of $7,074,000. Further, approval is being requested to increase ADS Environmental Services (ADS) contract by $125,000 from $6,212,400 to $6,337,400.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8, Page 142) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

As shown on the Budget Information Table, $4,156,569 has been spent to date on this project. The requested additional budget is needed to restore the budget to its original amount and allow the transfer of funds from contingency to the design consultant. The transfer of funds is reflected in the attached Budget Information Table.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The purpose of the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, is to identify major sources of infiltration and inflow (I/I) in the Orange County Sanitation District’s (District) trunk sewers and local agency tributary sewers. The Program consists of collecting wastewater flow data at 150 locations throughout the District over a five-year period.

Before the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) validation process was completed last fall, the original total approved budget for this project was $7,074,000 of which $6,212,400 was for ADS Environmental Services to conduct the flow monitoring; $494,000 was for District staff; and $367,600 was set aside as contingency. During the current year’s budgeting process, the “costs to date” were inadvertently left out of the 2003-04 Capital Improvement Program Budget. Hence, the total Project Budget in the 2003-04 Budget Book is now being shown as $2,852,000 instead of the required $7,074,000.

In order to meet one of the District’s primary Strategic Plan goals of reducing I/I over the next 20 years by 20%, it is essential that entire original budget for the Long Term Flow Monitoring Program, Job No. J-73-2, be reinstated.

The ADS contract includes a clause that requires the District to pay ADS $1,000 each time a meter is taken out and replaced during routine sewer cleaning. This process has occurred numerous times since the beginning of the project, and will continue to occur

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(e). J-73-2.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 over the flow monitoring period. In addition, there are several instances where due to changes in flow diversion settings, it has become necessary to relocate some of the meters to better monitor the flows at these locations.

It is anticipated that more flow meter relocations may be needed in the future. It is recommended that $125,000 be added to ADS Environmental Services (ADS) contract to cover the cost of taking the meters out of service or relocating them, and to conduct additional flow data analysis. ADS would only be allowed to spend these funds upon written authorization by Orange County Sanitation District (District) staff. This request would increase the PSA amount from $6,212,400 to $6,337,400.

ALTERNATIVES

Do not approve the budget requests. Not approving the budget requests would not allow the District to realize one of its important Strategic Plan goals. In addition, it would create an accounting problem because two ADS invoices have yet to be paid and District staff continues to charge to the project.

CEQA FINDINGS

This project is categorically exempt.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report

PK:sa G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\J-73-2 Agenda Report 9-4-03.doc

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(e). J-73-2.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 AGENDA REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM

As soon as the review of the Agenda Report is complete, call the contact person for pickup.

Committee Name: ______Meeting Date: ______

Subject of Agenda Report: ______

Report Type--Action (A) or Information (I): ___ Approximate Presentation Time: ______minutes

Originator/Contact Name: ______Telephone Ext.: ______

Presentation Support Needed: PowerPoint____ Other (specify)______(Send copy of this page to Dionne Kardos in Communications)

REVISIONS DATE TO REQUIRED REVIEWED COMMENTS

______Division Manager

______Department Head

______General Manager

Please complete the following section (required by Committee Secretary):

1. I will / will not attend the meeting 2. I will / will not eat dinner 3. The following person(s) will attend the meeting to assist with this presentation: (Please indicate if from an outside agency)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(e). J-73-2.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 4 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE LONG TERM FLOW MONITORING PROGRAM Job No. J-73-2

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development $ 58,000 $ 60,012 $ 60,012 $ 60,012 $ 60,012 $ 60,012

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 2,000 $ 787 $ 787 $ 787 $ 787 $ 787

Phase 3 - Design $ 33,000 $ 36,104 $ 36,104 $ 36,104 $ 36,104 $ 36,104

Phase 4 - Construction $ 6,613,400 $ 2,852,000 $ 3,872,497 $ 6,724,497 $ 6,599,497 $ 125,000 $ 6,724,497 $ 4,078,189

Phase 5 - Commissioning

Phase 6 - Close-Out $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 367,600 $ 242,600 $ 242,600

PROJECT TOTAL $ 7,074,000 $ 2,852,000 $ 4,222,000 $ 7,074,000 $ 6,706,400 $ 125,000 $ 6,831,400 $ 4,175,092

Reimbursable Costs $ 18,523

PROJECT NET $ 7,074,000 $ 2,852,000 $ 4,222,000 $ 7,074,000 $ 6,706,400 $ 125,000 $ 6,831,400 $ 4,156,569

PSA/Contract

Design PSA-Flow Monitoring $ 6,209,000 $ 2,852,000 $ 3,485,400 $ 6,337,400 $ 6,212,400 $125,000 $6,337,400$ 3,924,390

Construction Contract

EDMS: 003757555

Professional Services Agreement Status Report

Long Term Flow Monitoring Program

Job No. J-73-2

Total Project Budget: $7,074,400 Consultant: ADS Environmental, Inc. Start Date of Project: October 26, 2000

Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs

Long Term Flow Monitoring Program including identification of monitoring sites; installation of 10/25/00 Original PSA flow monitors; and flow data collection and $6,187,400 $ 6,187,400 maintenance of flow meters for a period of 5 years

Additional data collection and conversion of *Amendment 11/06/01 mapping database (GIS format). $25,000 $6,212,400 No. 1

Amendment Additional flow meter relocations and data Proposed $125,000 $6,337,400 No. 2 analysis

*General Manager Approval

PK:sa EDMS: 003753551

Revised 091703 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-87 13(f) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: David May, Project Manager

SUBJECT: ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION REHABILITATION, JOB NO. I-10

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Malcom Pirnie, Inc., for Ellis Avenue Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. I-10, providing for additional design engineering services for an additional amount of $400,055, increasing the total amount not to exceed $3,586,082.

SUMMARY

The requested Professional Services Agreement (PSA) amendment is based upon the following:

• Pump station site investigation activities have increased in addition to those originally scoped. The increase in activities occurred as a result of two separate drivers. First, eight sites were investigated versus six sites originally scoped. This was the result of an Orange County Sanitation District (District) request after the PSA and original Scope of Work were awarded. Second, the District received substantial public input and inquiry into the sites considered and investigated resulting in three more sites (11 total) being considered.

• Staff requested additional work to coordinate with Job No. I-2-4, Bushard Trunk Sewer Replacement.

• Staff has requested MPI to investigate the potential to divert flows destined for the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) Trunk to the Newhope Trunk to potentially increase flows to Plant No. 1.

• The length of preliminary design has increased. Associated project management tasks have increased correspondingly.

• The District will receive a credit of $13,300 for wet weather flow monitoring services not performed.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

See attached PSA Status Report.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(f).I-10.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

The total budget estimate for Ellis Avenue Pump Station Rehabilitation, Job No. I-10, is $33,837,000. This request is for $400,055 for Amendment No. 1 to the PSA. If approved, the amendment will bring the PSA total to $3,586,082. Authorized funds will be moved from Contingency to the Preliminary Engineering Phase to cover the additional cost. See attached Budget Information Table for more information.

The requested Amendment only covers additional services to date and through the Preliminary Design Phase. It is expected that PSA amendment requests will be made in the future for additional design and construction management services.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Project I-10, Page 8-46 of 2003/2004 FY Budget Book) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Both Orange County Sanitation District’s (District) 1989 Master Plan and 1999 Strategic Plan recommended equalizing flows to Plant Nos. 1 and 2 to provide the lowest overall new facilities capital cost program. The District’s decision to change to full secondary treatment does not affect the recommendation.

Each plan included moving treatment of SARI flows from Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1 to balance the flows between the plants. However, the Department of Health Services (DHS) has since required that SARI flows continue to be treated at Plant No. 2. This is because the Plant No. 1 secondary effluent is the influent for Water Factory 21 and the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS).

The District has begun the design to replace the current Ellis Avenue Pump Station to balance flows between the plants in concert with the DHS requirement to treat SARI flows at Plant No. 2. The originally contracted preliminary and final design services for the project consist of the following major elements:

• Abandonment of the current Ellis Avenue Pump Station. The existing Ellis Avenue Pump Station was built in 1952 and was last rehabilitated in 1987.

• Design of a new Ellis Avenue Pump Station and related site facilities.

• Design of a new 84-inch interplant trunk sewer to divert ultimate SARI flows to Plant No. 2.

• Design of diversion structures necessary to divert flows from the Miller Holder, Knott, and Magnolia Trunks to the new Ellis Avenue Pump Station.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(f).I-10.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 • Investigation into the diversion of flows away from the SARI Trunk to the Euclid and Newhope Trunks to reduce the amount of residential effluent flows in the SARI Trunk.

To date, the District has initiated preliminary design services and the preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the project. Preliminary design cannot complete until the final SEIR has been prepared and is ready for Board certification. During the course of preliminary design and the preparation of the SEIR, MPI has been requested to provide additional engineering services.

The additional services requested will aid the development of the SEIR and refine the District’s engineering design. The following specific PSA amendment elements are proposed for approval by the Board:

A. Project Schedule Extension: The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include additional project management services associated with the extended preliminary design schedule length. B. Additional SARI/Newhope Evaluation: The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include additional evaluation of the SARI/Newhope Trunk Sewers and the possibility of diverting flows intended for the SARI Trunk to the Newhope Trunk. C. Bushard Street Diversion Box Evaluation: The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include an evaluation of the Diversion Box to be installed in Bushard Street as part of Job No. I-2-4. Staff has requested that MPI evaluate potential Diversion Box structural changes to meet Job No. I-2-4 needs as well as Job No I-10 needs. The completed analysis will optimize the Diversion Boxes for both projects. D. Additional Pump Station Site Evaluation (Prior to SEIR Public Input): The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include additional site evaluation services for the proposed Ellis Avenue Pump Station. The original PSA was based on screening six total sites to determine the four most feasible, and performing a detailed evaluation of the four most feasible sites. Early in preliminary design, one of the six original sites was eliminated from the screening process and three new sites were added, making a total of eight sites to be initially screened. The eight sites were screened to the four most feasible sites. The four most feasible sites received detailed evaluation. In addition to the number of sites screened, the District required additional qualitative criteria to be considered in the initial screening, which was in addition to the criteria proposed in the original PSA Scope of Work. All criteria, including the additional criteria, were used to screen the eight initial sites. The use of the criteria in the initial screening of the eight sites was more extensive than the original PSA Scope of Work included. The original PSA Scope of Work required fewer criterions to be evaluated in the first screening of sites considered. E. Bushard / Miller Holder Trunk Sewer Corrosion Study: The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include an evaluation of the corrosion potential for the Bushard and Miller Holder Trunk Sewers that will result when diverting flows to the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. Diverting flows will “dry up” a portion of the downstream piping of the trunks, exposing unlined pipe to corrosive conditions. The length of piping affected, and the period of exposure to corrosive conditions will be evaluated.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(f).I-10.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 Modeling and additional engineering analysis will be used to determine the parameters and a technical memorandum will be produced to document the results of the evaluation. F. Pump Station Capacity Evaluation: The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include an evaluation of existing and projected flows to Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and to verify the basis of design for the proposed Ellis Avenue Pump Station. This additional evaluation will include the latest District Strategic Plan information, CIP Validation results, and other planning information that was not available at the time the original PSA was awarded. Basic planning assumptions changed that need to be accounted for in the design of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station. Accounting for these changed assumptions will ensure that the Pump Station is designed to meet all District criteria and constraints currently known. G. Additional Pump Station Site Investigation (After SEIR Public Input): The scope of the PSA is requested to be amended to include additional site investigation services for the proposed Ellis Avenue Pump Station. The additional investigation proposed under this task is to respond to public comment received at the August 25, 2003 public scoping meeting. The public was present to provide comment on the District’s Notice of Preparation (NOP), mailed on August 8, 2003. The NOP is the first step in the SEIR process required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The public requested that additional sites be considered as part of the screening process. H. Plant No. 1 Diversion Tunnel Design: To be determined later and not included in this amendment request. I. Relocate Upstream Diversion to Heil Avenue: To be determined later and not included in this amendment request. Amendment requests A, B, D, E, F,G, and H are described in detail in the attached Proposed Amendment Requests with corresponding schedule amendment numbering (i.e. Schedule A corresponds to Amendment Request A described above).

ALTERNATIVES

Do not approve the requested amendments and move forward with the schedule delays and project information deficiencies that will result. Additionally, move forward with no additional investigation of pump station capacity, corrosion, flow diversions, and diversion box design criteria. The reduced amount of information would carry the risk of potential change orders on this project or additional future District projects to address the issues being investigated at this time.

CEQA FINDINGS

An SEIR is currently being prepared and is expected to come before the Orange County Board of Directors for certification in approximately June, 2004.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(f).I-10.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 4 ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Summary of Proposed Fees

DM:ba G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\I-10 AR_PSA Amendment No 1_110603.doc

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(f).I-10.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 5 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station Contract No. I-10

ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT/TASK AUTHORIZED PROJECT BUDGET REVISED AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED BUDGET BUDGET INCREASE BUDGET TO DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE TO DATE(%)

Project Development $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0%

Studies/Permitting $ 97,000 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 0%

Design Consultant $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,386,027 $ 3,186,027 $ 3,186,027 $ 3,186,027 0%

Design Staff $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 $ 290,000 0%

Property Purchase $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000

Construction Contract $ 18,848,000 $ 18,848,000 $ 18,848,000 $ - Construction Administration $ 419,000 $ 419,000 $ 419,000 $ - Construction Inspection $ 526,000 $ 526,000 $ 526,000 $ -

Contingency $ 4,590,000 $ 4,590,000 $ (1,386,027) $ 3,203,973 $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ 27,100,000 $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 3,603,027 $ 3,603,027 $ - 0%

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ 27,100,000 $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 27,100,000 $ - $ 3,603,027 $ 3,603,027 $ - 0%

Professional Services Agreement Status Report

Job No. I-10

Total Project Budget: $33,837,000 Consultant: Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Start Date of Project: December 5, 2002

Accumulated Date Amendment Description Cost Costs

9-25-2002 Original PSA Engineering & Construction Support Services $3,186,027 $3,186,027

Pending 1 Additional Engineering Services $400,055 $3,586,082

EDMS: 003753570

11/13/03 Revised 05/14/98 Orange County Sanitation District Contract No. I-10 Replacement of the Ellis Avenue Pump Station Original Proposal Submitted May 20, 2003 Schedule Description Hours Burden Overhead Profit Subtotal Direct Subs Total No. Labor Costs AProject Schedule Extension 921 $ 55,786 $ 52,997 $ 8,594 $ 117,377 $ 423 $ 18,273 $ 136,073 B Additional SARI/Newhope Evaluation 914 $ 51,718 $ 49,132 $ 7,967 $ 108,817 $ 983 $ 126,596 $ 236,396

C OCWD Water Line 663 $ 35,472 $ 33,698 $ 5,464 $ 74,634 $ 900 $ 18,000 $ 93,534

D Bushard Street Diversion Box Evaluation 647 $ 34,741 $ 33,004 $ 5,352 $ 73,097 $ 704 $ 53,503 $ 127,304

E Additional Pump Station Site Evaluation 690 $ 34,223 $ 32,512 $ 5,271 $ 72,006 $ 1,494 $ - $ 73,500

F Bushard/Miller Holder Corrosion Study 125 $ 8,035 $ 7,633 $ 1,238 $ 16,906 $ 94 $ 18,290 $ 35,290

G Pump Station Capacity Evaluation 366 $ 24,092 $ 22,888 $ 3,711 $ 50,691 $ 309 $ - $ 51,000

Totals 4326 $ 244,067 $ 231,864 $ 37,597 $ 513,528 $ 4,907 $ 234,662 $ 753,097

Revised Proposal Submitted June 20, 2003 Schedule Description Hours Burden Overhead Profit Subtotal Direct Subs Total No. Labor Costs A Project Schedule Extension 987 $ 67,357 $ 63,990 $ 10,377 $ 141,724 $ 1,176 $ 16,600 $ 159,500

B Additional SARI/Newhope Evaluation 1,559 $ 81,435 $ 77,363 $ 12,545 $ 171,343 $ 1,453 $ 87,204 $ 260,000

C OCWD Water Line 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - D Bushard Street Diversion Box Evaluation 623 $ 33,501 $ 31,825 $ 5,161 $ 70,487 $ 713 $ 57,800 $ 129,000

E Additional Pump Station Site Evaluation 674 $ 33,255 $ 31,592 $ 5,123 $ 69,970 $ 1,530 $ - $ 71,500 F Bushard/Miller Holder Corrosion Study 88 $ 5,763 $ 5,475 $ 888 $ 12,126 $ 174 $ 25,200 $ 37,500 G Pump Station Capacity Evaluation 322 $ 21,442 $ 20,370 $ 3,304 $ 45,116 $ 384 $ - $ 45,500 Totals 4253 $ 242,753 $ 230,615 $ 37,398 $ 510,766 $ 5,430 $ 186,804 $ 703,000

Negotiated Amount based on August 12, 2003 Telephone Conversation Schedule Description Hours Burden Overhead Profit Subtotal Direct Subs Total No. Labor Costs AProject Schedule Extension 855 $ 61,492 $ 58,417 $ 9,473 $ 129,382 $ 1,018 $ 16,600 $ 147,000 B Additional SARI/Newhope Evaluation 50 $ 3,589 $ 3,409 $ 553 $ 7,551 $ 49 $ 25,000 $ 32,600

C OCWD Water Line 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - D Bushard Street Diversion Box Evaluation 136 $ 7,725 $ 7,339 $ 1,191 $ 16,255 $ - $ - $ 16,255

E Additional Pump Station Site Evaluation 622 $ 30,830 $ 29,289 $ 4,749 $ 64,868 $ 632 $ - $ 65,500 F Bushard/Miller Holder Corrosion Study 88 $ 5,763 $ 5,475 $ 888 $ 12,126 $ 174 $ 25,200 $ 37,500 G Pump Station Capacity Evaluation 262 $ 18,409 $ 17,488 $ 2,836 $ 38,733 $ 267 $ 39,000 H Additional Pump Station Site Investigation 520 $ 30,175 $ 28,667 $ 4,649 $ 63,491 $ 284 $ 11,725 $ 75,500 Delete Wet Weather Flow Monitoring 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (13,300) $ (13,300) Totals 2533 $ 157,983 $ 150,084 $ 24,339 $ 332,406 $ 2,424 $ 65,225 $ 400,055

Other Pending Changes Schedule Description Hours Burden Overhead Profit Subtotal Direct Subs Total No. Labor Costs Plant No. 1 Diversion Trunk Tunnel Design? ? Pump Station Cut-off Wall Design ? ?

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-88 13(g) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Hardat Khublall, Engineer

SUBJECT: WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-22

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for the Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 11-22, providing for additional engineering services during construction, for an additional amount of $78,500, increasing the total amount not to exceed $440,979.

SUMMARY

• This project, located in the City of Huntington Beach, consists of improvements to relieve hydraulic deficiencies on two separate reaches of the existing Warner Avenue Relief Sewer and to relieve deficiencies in the overall sewer drainage basin tributary to that trunk sewer. The 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report identified these two reaches of the Warner Avenue Sewer to be hydraulically deficient, and in need of replacement.

• The Construction of this new sewer line along Warner Avenue has impacted the City of Huntington Beach (City) and its residents. Staff, supported by the Design Consultant, are working together with the City and the Contractor to resolve a variety of issues including alignment and Traffic Control changes.

• This estimated amount of $78,500 includes additional Engineering Construction Support Services to provide shop drawing reviews, preparation of field design changes, attending meetings, and responding to Requests for Information (RFI).

• The fees proposed for construction support services are estimates prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., and District staff and are based on experience with similar projects of this size. All work performed and billed will be on an as requested basis by District staff to support the project.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

1. Approval of a budget increase by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2002 in the amount of $2,118,000. 2. Award of a Construction Contract to ARB, Inc. on May 28, 2002. 3. See attached Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Status Report.

Revised: 8/10/98 Page 1 PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

A Budget Authorization of $78,500 is requested from Phase 4 Construction Budget increasing the proposed total Authorization for Phase 4 Construction to $6,134,000 and the Consultant’s PSA to $440,979. A budget reallocation authorization of $2,200 is also requested to be moved from contingency to Phase 2 Preliminary Design, increasing the proposed total authorization for Phase 2 Design to $4,200. Refer to the attached Budget Information Table and PSA Status Report.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Warner Avenue Relief Sewer, Section 8, page 40) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The construction support services budget estimated by the Design Consultant in the amount of $22,000 was too low. The complex nature of this project has caused the Design Consultant to spend much more time than what was budgeted for initially. This estimated budget Amendment No. 3 of $78,500 is recommended to cover the Design Consultant’s cost for the remainder of the Contract.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are being presented.

CEQA FINDINGS

This project is included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Program Environmental Impact Report that was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29, 1999.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. PSA Status Report 3. Consultant’s Letter

HK:ba:jo:ba G:\ntglobal\Agenda Draft Reports\PDC\11-22 AR Amendment 3.doc

Revised: 8/10/98 Page 2 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE WARNER AVENUE RELIEF SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-22

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development $ 10,200 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 48,718

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 10,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,200 $ 4,200 $ 2,000 $ 2,200 $ 4,200 $ 4,167

Phase 3 - Design $ 400,000 $ 680,000 $ 680,000 $ 362,479 $ 362,479 $ 635,929

Phase 4 - Construction $ 2,696,600 $ 6,134,000 $ 6,134,000 $ 6,055,500 $ 78,500 $ 6,134,000 $ 1,205,308

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ 128,000 $ - $ -

Phase 6 - Close-Out $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ 37,000 $ - $ -

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 929,500 $ 449,000 $ (2,200) $ 446,800 $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ 4,211,300 $ 7,480,000 $ - $ 7,480,000 $ 6,469,979 $ 80,700 $ 6,550,679 $ 1,894,122

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ 4,211,300 $ 7,480,000 $ - $ 7,480,000 $ 6,469,979 $ 80,700 $ 6,550,679 $ 1,894,122

PSA/Contract

Design PSA $ 282,479 $ 362,479 $ 78,500 $ 440,979 $ 362,479 $ 78,500 $ 440,979 $ 282,480 Construction Contract $ 5,089,040 $ 5,242,040 $ - $ 5,242,040 $ 5,242,040 $ - $ 5,242,040 $ 1,113,237 Professional Services Agreement Status Report

Warner Avenue Relief Sewer Contract No. 11-22

Total Project Budget: $7,480,000 Consultant: Tetra Tech, Inc. Start Date of Project: April 1, 2000

Accumulated Date Amendment Description Cost Costs 3/22/2000 Original PSA Design Warner Avenue Relief Sewer $224,800 $224,800 Incorporation of 2,700 LF of City sewer into 3/28/2001 No. 1 design, and structural design of pipeline $57,679 $282,479 transition structure 9/24/2003 No. 2 Additional Design Services $80,000 $362,479 Pending No. 3 Additional Construction Support $78,500 $440,979

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. PDC COMMITTEE 11/06/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT PDC03-89 13(h) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Umesh Murthy, Engineer

SUBJECT: EFFLUENT PUMP STATION ANNEX, JOB NO. J-77

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Approve Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation for additional construction support services for Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77, for an additional amount of $1,776,417, increasing the total amount not to exceed to $6,164,240.

SUMMARY

• The Effluent Pump Station Annex (ESPA), Job No. J-77, will replace the existing Foster Booster Pump Station with a new pumping facility that is capable of providing adequate backup capacity to the existing Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) during excess flow events and routine maintenance. EPSA will also accommodate the pumping of secondary treated water exclusively through the 78-Inch outfall during excess flow events.

• Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V) prepared the plans and specifications for this project and the construction contract was awarded to J.F. Shea Construction Inc. on September 24, 2003 for $44,735,518. Construction is expected to begin in November 2003 and is expected to last in excess of three years.

• Construction support services from B&V are necessary during the construction phase. This work includes review of shop drawings, requests for information, preparation of record drawings, and assistance in commissioning and initial operation of the new facilities.

• The fees proposed for construction support services are estimates prepared by B&V and District staff and are based on experience with other projects of this size. All work performed and billed will be on an as requested basis by District staff to support the project.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

1. Award of the Construction Contract to J.F. Shea Corporation, September 2003. 2. Please see the attached Professional Service Agreement (PSA) Status Report.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(h).J-77.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Authorization of an additional $1,776,417 is being requested to B&V’s Professional Services Agreement (PSA) as indicated in the attached Budget Information Table.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: Section 8 - Page 73) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The proposed Amendment No. 5 is for providing additional construction support services, not included in the PSA or Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and includes the following:

1. Preparation of conformed drawings 2. Review of additional shop drawings. 3. Preparation of responses to request for information (RFI) from contractor. 4. Attendance at progress meetings and site visits. 5. Preparation of record drawings. 6. Start up and initial operation of facilities.

The PSA and Amendment Nos. 1 through 4 include $475,478 for construction support services on this project. Proposed Amendment No. 5 of $1,776,417 will increase the total cost for construction support services to $2,251,895 (5.03% of the construction contract). The attached proposal letter from B&V provides details for the construction support services.

ALTERNATIVES

No alternatives are proposed.

CEQA FINDINGS

The rehabilitation of the Foster Booster Pump Station was included in the 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR was certified on October 27, 1999, and a Notice of Determination was filed on October 29,1999. A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was completed for update of the Program Environmental Impact Report to reflect replacement of the Foster Booster Pump Station rather than the rehabilitation indicated in the 1999 Strategic Plan Environmental Impact Report. The SEIR was approved by the Board in December of 2002.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. Professional Services Agreement Status Report 3. Proposal letter and fee

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 13(h).J-77.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2

BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE Effluent Pump Station Annex JOB NO. J-77

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development$ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 2,100 $ 2,100 $ 2,058 Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 1,258,000 $ 60,045 $ 60,045 $ 60,045 $ - $ 60,045 $ 60,045

Phase 3 - Design $ 3,501,000 $ 4,387,823 $ 4,387,823 $ 4,387,823 $ 4,387,823 $ 4,280,918

Phase 4 - Construction$ 43,745,000 $ 51,791,650 $ 51,791,650 $ 48,139,649 $ 48,139,649 $ 32,000

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ 376,000 $ 376,000 $ 376,000 $ 376,000 $ 376,000 $ -

Phase 6 - Close-Out$ 94,000 $ 94,000 $ 94,000 $ 94,000 $ 94,000 $ -

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 1,762,000 $ 1,762,000 $ 1,762,000 $ -

PROJECT TOTAL $ 50,757,000 $ 58,492,518 $ - $ 58,492,518 $ 53,059,617 $ - $ 53,059,617 $ 4,375,021

Reimbursable Costs

PROJECT NET $ 50,757,000 $ 58,492,518 $ - $ 58,492,518 $ 53,059,617 $ - $ 53,059,617 $ 4,375,021

PSA/Contract

Design/Const. Support PSA$ 2,208,810 $ 6,164,240 $ - $ 6,164,240 $ 4,387,823 $ 1,776,417 $ 6,164,240 $ 3,633,158

Construction Contract$ 44,735,518 $ 44,735,518 $ - $ 44,735,518 $ 44,735,518 $ - $ 44,735,518

003756361 Professional Services Agreement Status Report Effluent Pump Station Annex Job No. J-77

Total Project Budget: $50,757,000 Consultant: Black & Veatch Engineers Start Date of Project: May 25, 2000

Accumulated Date Addendum Description Cost Costs 5/25/00 Original Effluent Pump Station Annex, Job No. J-77 $2,208,810 $2,208,810 PSA 8/27/01 Addendum Provide Additional Preliminary and Final Design $1,273,113 $3,481,923 #1 Work, & Addition of Emergency Backup Power and Structure. 5/22/02 Addendum Provide Additional Scope Items to include I&C $229,600 $3,711,523 #2 Upgrade, Utility Location, Demolition of FPS, 42” Siphon, 96” BFV Replacement, and North Entry Gate Modification. 11/20/02 Addendum Provide Additional Scope Items to include $304,000 $4,015,523 #3 Redesign of SPF; I&C Upgrades; Fire Protection; Additional Landscaping; Security, Telephone, and PDA Systems; and, Specifications Upgrades. 6/25/03 Addendum Upgrade to Revision E Standard for I&C, $372,300 $4,387,823 #4 Coordination with Parallel Projects, and Additional Items Due to DS#3 Review Comments Pending Addendum Provide Construction Support Services Through $ $ #5 Remainder of Project

RW:sa EDMS 003742122

11/13/03 Revised 05/14/98 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-87 14(b) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller

SUBJECT: TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2003

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Receive and file Treasurer’s Report for the month of October 2003.

SUMMARY

Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), serves as the District’s professional external money manager, and Mellon Trust serves as the District’s third-party custodian bank for the investment program. Some funds are also deposited in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund for liquidity.

The District’s Investment Policy, adopted by the Board, includes reporting requirements as listed down the left most column of the attached PIMCO Monthly Report for the “Liquid Operating Monies” and for the “Long-Term Operating Monies” portfolios. The District’s external money manager is operating in compliance with the requirements of the Investment Policy. The portfolio contains no reverse repurchase agreements.

As shown on page 2 of the attached PIMCO’s Performance Monitoring and Reporting Report for the Long-Term Operating Monies, there is a investment policy compliance exception pertaining to the holding of two securities within PIMCO’s Long-Term Operating Monies Portfolio that had an acceptable rating at the time of purchase but has since fallen below the minimum rating allowed by the investment policy. The District’s investment policy requires a minimum rating of A3 by Moody’s or A- by S&P, with at least a BBB rating in the event of a split rating, at the time of purchase. The first of these rating exceptions pertains to the holding of a United Airlines (UAL) Asset Backed Security with a par value of $1.6 million, representing 0.4 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating from Moody’s has fallen several times, from A3 to BA1, then to BA3, B3, B, and finally to CA. Likewise, the rating from Standard & Poor’s has also fallen several times, first from A- to BBB, then to BB, then to B+, B-, and finally to CCC+. Although these ratings are less than what is required at the time of purchase, PIMCO believes, based on the financial strength of UAL and the underlying collateral of the security, that the District would suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time.

The second ratings exception pertains to the holding of a $5 million par of the Philip Morris-Altria corporate bond with an April 2004 maturity, representing 1.3 percent of the portfolio holdings, whose rating with Moody’s has fallen from A2 to Baa1 and then to

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(b).TREASRPT.doc Page 1 Baa2, and with S&P from A- to BBB. PIMCO believes based on the underlying assets of the parent company, that the District would again suffer an unwarranted loss if the security was sold at this time.

The District’s investment policy does not require any action because of "credit watch" notices or the decline in credit standing. However, PIMCO will continue to monitor the credit for these two securities very closely.

Historical cost and current market values are shown as estimated by both PIMCO and Mellon Trust. The District’s portfolios are priced to market (“mark-to-market”) as of the last day of each reporting period. The slight differences in value are related to minor variations in pricing assumptions by the valuation sources at the estimate date.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Schedules are attached summarizing the detail for both the short-term and long-term investment portfolios for the reporting period. In addition, a consolidated report of posted investment portfolio transactions for the month is attached. The attached yield analysis report is presented as a monitoring and reporting enhancement. In this report, yield calculations based on book values and market values are shown for individual holdings, as well as for each portfolio. Mellon Trust, the District’s custodian bank, is the source for these reports. Transactions that were pending settlement at month end may not be reflected. Also provided is a summary of monthly investment balances and transactions within the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

In addition, the remaining $117.6 million proceeds from the 2003 COP debt issuance available for future capital improvements is being managed and invested by PIMCO with Union Bank of California serving as the Trustee. When combined with the reserves of the existing outstanding debt issues, total debt service reserves with trustees totals $179,510,406.

These reports accurately reflect all District investments and are in compliance with California Government Code Section 53646 and the District’s Investment Policy. Sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months.

The table on the following page details the book balances of the District’s investment accounts at month-end. A graphical representation of month-end balances is shown on the attached bar chart.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(b).TREASRPT.doc Page 2

Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts October 31, 2003 Yield (%)

State of Calif. LAIF $ 35,500,246 1.60 Union Bank Checking Account 724,723 0.94 (1) PIMCO – Short-term Portfolio 37,478,445 1.40 PIMCO - Long-term Portfolio 380,081,334 2.84 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A

TOTAL $453,789,748 2.63

$179,510,406 2.11 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees

(1) This is the annualized yield for the month of September. The October annualized rate was not available as of the date of this report.

ATTACHMENTS 1. Graph of Monthly Investment Balances by Type – Last Six Months 2. Investment Transactions and Balances in the State Local Agency Investment Fund 3. PIMCO Monthly Investment Recap & Yield Analysis Report 4. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report – Liquid Operating Monies 5. PIMCO Performance Monitoring Report – Long-Term Operating Monies 6. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors – Liquid Operating Monies 7. Mellon Trust Asset Summary by Asset Type with Sectors – L-T Operating Monies 8. Mellon Trust Yield Analysis Report 9. Mellon Trust Asset Detail – Consolidated 10. Mellon Trust Transaction Detail - Consolidated

MW:lc

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(b).TREASRPT.doc Page 3 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-91 14(c) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller

SUBJECT: QUARTERLY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2003 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Management Program Report for the period July 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003.

SUMMARY

Section 15.0 of the District's Investment Policy includes monthly and quarterly reporting requirements for the District's two investment portfolios. These two funds, the "Liquid Operating Monies," and the "Long-Term Operating Monies" are managed by PIMCO, the District's external money manager.

The ongoing monitoring of the District's investment program by staff and Callan Associates, the District's independent investment advisor, indicates that the District's investments are in compliance with the District's adopted Investment Policy and the California Government Code, and that overall performance has tracked with benchmark indices. In addition, sufficient liquidity and anticipated revenues are available for the District to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months. The District's portfolios do not include any reverse repurchase agreements or derivative securities.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

N/A

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(c).Qtly Investment Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Performance Reports The Quarterly Strategy Review, prepared by PIMCO, and the Investment Measurement Service Quarterly Review, prepared by Callan Associates, are attached for reference. Also attached are Long-Term and Liquid Operating Monies Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics charts that depict the performance results, estimated yield and duration, credit quality, and sector diversification of the District's portfolios, as of July 1, 2003 and September 30, 2003. The Liquid Operating Monies portfolio, with an average maturity of 90 days, consists entirely of cash equivalent investments such as U.S. Treasuries and corporate discount notes.

Portfolio Performance Summary The following table presents a performance summary of the District's portfolios as compared to their benchmarks for the period July 1 through September 30, 2003.

Portfolio Performance Summary Quarter Ended September 30, 2003 Liquid Operating Monies (%) Long-Term Operating Monies (%) Total Rate Total Rate of (1) (1) of Return Benchmark Return Benchmark 3 Months 0.29 0.25 0.34 0.34 6 Months 0.60 0.53 1.80 2.00 9 Months 0.96 0.83 2.98 3.16 12 Months 1.47 1.22 4.09 4.55 Since inception 30 Sept. 95 4.77 4.27 6.70 6.68

Market Value $38.0M $385.9M Average Quality “AAA” “AAA” Current Yield (%) 4.2 4.4 Estimated Yield to Maturity (%) 1.3 2.5 Quarterly Deposits (Withdrawals) $(28.7)M $54.1M Estimated Annual Income $1.5M $16.0M

(1) Benchmarks: ƒ Liquid Operating Portfolio: 3-Month Treasury Bill Index ƒ Long-Term Operating Portfolio: Merrill Lynch Corp/Govt. 1-5 Year Bond Index

Portfolio Market Values Comparative marked-to-market quarter-end portfolio values are shown in the following table, and in the attached bar chart.

Liquid Long-Term Quarter Operating Operating Ending Monies ($M) Monies ($M)

31 Dec. 02 64.3 321.2

31 Mar. 03 49.6 325.0

30 June 03 66.5 329.7

30 Sept. 03 38.0 385.9

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(c).Qtly Investment Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 2

District’s Investment Account Balances as of September 30, 2003

Book Balances Estimated Investment Accounts September 30, 2003 Yield (%)

State of Calif. LAIF $ 34,246,098 1.64 Union Bank Checking Account 1,485,007 0.94 PIMCO – Short-term Portfolio 37,481,283 1.43 PIMCO - Long-term Portfolio 382,596,263 2.83 Petty Cash 5,000 N/A

TOTAL $455,813,651 2.62

$191,580,843 1.84 Debt Service Reserves w/Trustees

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Historical Yield Curve Graph 2. PIMCO Quarterly Report 3. Quarter End Portfolio Market Value Bar Chart 4. Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics – Liquid Operating Monies 5. Summary of Performance Data and Portfolio Statistics – L-T Operating Monies 6. Asset Summary by Asset Type – Liquid Operating Portfolio 7. Asset Summary by Asset Type – Long Term Portfolio 8. Investment Listing of Liquid Operating and L-T Portfolios (Yield Analysis Report). 9. Investment Transactions and Balances in LAIF 10. Callan Report (separate bound document) 11. PIMCO Report (separate bound document)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(c).Qtly Investment Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 3 OCSD Investment Management Program Quarter End Portfolio Values (Marked-to-Market)

$450,000,000

$400,000,000

$350,000,000

$300,000,000

$250,000,000

$200,000,000

$150,000,000

$100,000,000

$50,000,000

$0 30 Jun 02 30 Sep 02 31 Dec 02 31 Mar 03 30 Jun 03 30 Sep 03

Liquid Operating Monies Long-Term Operating Monies Report ID: GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency: USD

Alternate Base Currency: by Asset Type with Sectors Exchange Rate: LIQUID OPER-PIMCO - OCSF07511102 9/30/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base BaseTotal Base CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR INTEREST 468,854.70 468,854.70 1.24% 0.00 CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - DOMESTIC 1,400,000.000 1,400,000.00 1,400,000.00 3.69% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THAN 1YR 6,100,000.000 6,081,765.24 6,081,765.24 16.03% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 6,200,000.000 6,171,369.67 6,171,369.67 16.26% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THAN 1YR 3,300,000.000 3,288,893.54 3,288,893.54 8.67% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 175,658.110 175,658.11 175,658.11 0.46% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THAN 1YR 1,200,000.000 1,194,191.67 1,194,191.67 3.15% 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 18,375,658.110 18,780,732.93 18,780,732.93 49.49% 0.00

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 18,375,658.110 18,780,732.93 18,780,732.93 49.49% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR BANKING & FINANCE 4,950,000.000 5,121,180.00 5,036,662.50 13.27% -84,517.50 INDUSTRIAL 300,000.000 308,808.00 302,013.00 0.80% -6,795.00 U.S. AGENCIES 7,200,000.000 7,441,266.00 7,293,131.32 19.22% -148,134.68 U.S. GOVERNMENTS 5,800,000.000 6,251,984.38 5,877,952.00 15.49% -374,032.38 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 650,000.000 677,046.50 659,646.00 1.74% -17,400.50 U.S. DOLLAR 18,900,000.000 19,800,284.88 19,169,404.82 50.51% -630,880.06

FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 18,900,000.000 19,800,284.88 19,169,404.82 50.51% -630,880.06

TOTAL ASSETS - BASE: 37,275,658.110 38,581,017.81 37,950,137.75 100.00% -630,880.06

1 Workbench Report ID: GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency: USD

by Asset Type with Sectors Alternate Base Currency: Exchange Rate: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO - OCSF07522202 9/30/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base BaseTotal Base CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS U.S. DOLLAR CASH -180,169.24 -180,169.24 -0.05% 0.00 PENDING TRADES -24,662,805.47 -24,662,805.47 -6.39% 0.00 INTEREST 3,332,359.74 3,332,359.74 0.86% 0.00 COMMERCIAL PAPER - DISCOUNT 3,400,000.000 3,388,394.44 3,388,394.44 0.88% 0.00 FED HM LOAN BNK - LESS THAN 1YR 32,300,000.000 32,183,468.43 32,183,468.43 8.34% 0.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE -LESS THAN 1 9,700,000.000 9,672,980.11 9,672,980.11 2.51% 0.00 FNMA ISSUES - LESS THAN 1YR 42,800,000.000 42,651,438.17 42,651,438.17 11.05% 0.00 MUTUAL FUNDS 143,053.620 143,053.62 143,053.62 0.04% 0.00 TREASURY BILLS - LESS THAN 1YR 4,500,000.000 4,478,218.75 4,478,218.75 1.16% 0.00 U.S. DOLLAR 92,843,053.620 71,006,938.55 71,006,938.55 18.40% 0.00

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS 92,843,053.620 71,006,938.55 71,006,938.55 18.40% 0.00 FIXED INCOME SECURITIES U.S. DOLLAR ABS - AIRPLANE RECEIVABLES 1,600,000.000 1,600,000.00 244,000.00 0.06% -1,356,000.00 BANKING & FINANCE 32,335,000.000 33,468,411.00 34,442,367.45 8.92% 973,956.45 COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION 2,504,229.760 2,504,229.76 2,718,717.04 0.70% 214,487.28 FHLMC MULTICLASS 1,198,327.690 1,199,604.37 1,246,776.08 0.32% 47,171.71 FHLMC POOLS 194,797.030 195,424.71 200,869.18 0.05% 5,444.47 FNMA POOLS 47,749,442.050 48,990,910.44 49,207,916.28 12.75% 217,005.84 GNMA MULTI FAMILY POOLS 3,718,877.150 3,700,333.93 3,779,028.74 0.98% 78,694.81 GNMA SINGLE FAMILY POOLS 11,850,348.080 12,071,678.59 12,432,369.33 3.22% 360,690.74 INDUSTRIAL 12,000,000.000 12,458,780.00 12,436,500.00 3.22% -22,280.00 INFLATION INDEXED SECURITIES 34,241,230.000 34,258,241.71 38,367,363.32 9.94% 4,109,121.61 PVT PLACEMENTS - MORE THN 1YR 752,000.000 826,199.84 826,199.84 0.21% 0.00 U.S. AGENCIES 41,204,132.880 42,280,838.46 44,547,779.14 11.54% 2,266,940.68 U.S. GOVERNMENTS 92,597,276.280 100,770,646.50 100,926,237.71 26.15% 155,591.21 UTILITY - ELECTRIC 6,500,000.000 6,438,210.00 6,967,160.00 1.81% 528,950.00 UTILITY - TELEPHONE 6,000,000.000 6,594,240.00 6,578,400.00 1.70% -15,840.00 U.S. DOLLAR 294,445,660.920 307,357,749.31 314,921,684.11 81.60% 7,563,934.80

1 Workbench Report ID: GL8251 Asset Summary Base Currency: USD

Alternate Base Currency: by Asset Type with Sectors Exchange Rate: LONG TERM OPER-PIMCO - OCSF07522202 9/30/2003 Status: FINAL Net Unrealized Cost Market Value % of Gain/Loss Description Shares Par Base BaseTotal Base FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 294,445,660.920 307,357,749.31 314,921,684.11 81.60% 7,563,934.80

TOTAL ASSETS - BASE: 387,288,714.540 378,364,687.86 385,928,622.66 100.00% 7,563,934.80

2 Workbench Orange County Sanitation District Investment Transactions and Balances in the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund September 30, 2003

Par Value Book Value Market Value Rate Yield

Balance September 1, 2003 $33,946,098 $33,946,098 $33,946,098 1.632 1.632

Deposits:

9/19/2003 12,600,000 12,600,000 12,600,000 1.632 1.632

Withdrawals:

9/3/2003 (300,000) (300,000) (300,000) 1.632 1.632 9/10/2003 (4,300,000) (4,300,000) (4,300,000) 1.632 1.632 9/17/2003 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) 1.632 1.632 9/24/2003 (5,700,000) (5,700,000) (5,700,000) 1.632 1.632 Total Withdrawls (12,300,000) (12,300,000) (12,300,000) 1.632 1.632

Balance September 30, 2003 $34,246,098 $34,246,098 $34,246,098 1.632 1.632 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-92 14(d) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael D. White, Controller

SUBJECT: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Receive and file the FY 2003-04 Financial Report for the First Quarter ended September 30, 2003.

SUMMARY

Attached in a separately bound document is the District's First Quarter Financial Report for the period ended September 30, 2003. This report is a consolidation of the financial accomplishments of the District through the through the first quarter of the FY 2002-03.

Contained within the First Quarter Financial Report are budget summary reviews of the Joint Operating & Working Capital Funds, the Capital Improvement Program, the Revenue Areas, and the self-insurance funds.

As indicated within the Overview Section of this report, 24.4 percent, or $18.81 million of the FY 2003-04 net joint operating budget of $77.0 million has been expended. Net cost has increased $4.21 million, or 28.9 percent in comparison with the same period last year primarily due to the increased level of wastewater treatment with full disinfection.

The total cost per million gallons at September 30, 2003 is $823.82 based on flows of 22.83 billion gallons, or 248.17 million gallons per day. This is $17.81, or 2.1 percent below the budgeted cost per million gallons of $841.63. This shortfall is primarily due to expenditures being lower than budget by 2.3 percent, or $0.44 million. This expenditure shortfall is somewhat offset by the fact that flows are 0.7 percent lower than the budget estimate of 250 million gallons per day.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

N/A

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(d).Financial Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

None.

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. FY 2003-04 Financial Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(d).Financial Report.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 2 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-93 14(e) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources ORIGINATOR: James Matte, Safety and Health Supervisor

SUBJECT: Safety Policy, Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program Policy

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Approve SAFETY-POL-113, Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program as provided for in Resolution No. OCSD 02-5, regarding the District’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program.

SUMMARY

The District is implementing a written policy to adopt Cal-OSHA requirements for a written exposure control plan for bloodborne pathogens as found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, section 5193. These regulations require a written plan if employees are exposed to blood or body fluids. The District has developed this plan to ensure members of the Medical Unit are adequately protected from these materials.

The document presented for your review and adoption represents the Districts written Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program that conforms to the elements defined in the California Department of Toxics Substances Control Regulations, Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Not Applicable

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Policy required under the Cal-OSHA Regulations, found in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, section 5193.

ALTERNATIVES

Not Applicable

CEQA FINDINGS

Not Applicable

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1- Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program (SAFETY- POL-113)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(e).SAFETY-POL-113.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2

ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT

Safety and Health Division

SAFETY-POL-113 Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens Program

APPROVALS

Approved by: Date:______Director of Human Resources

Approved by: Date:______Manager, Human Resources

Approved by: Date:______Safety and Health Supervisor

PROCEDURE REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Approval

This document is controlled when viewed online. When downloaded and printed, this document becomes UNCONTROLLED, and users should check the Safety and Health public folder to ensure that they have the latest version.

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

Contents

1. Purpose...... 3 2. Definitions ...... 3 3. Exposure Determination ...... 4 4. General Methods of Compliance ...... 5 5. Hepatitis B Vaccine...... 7 6. Post Exposure Monitoring and Follow Up...... 8 7. Review of Exposure Incidents ...... 10 8. Training and Communication ...... 11 9. Medical Records ...... 12 10. Program Administration and Evaluation ...... 13 11. References...... 14 12. Attachments ...... 14

Number: SAFETY-POL-113 Orange County Sanitation District Revision Number: 0

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Date: November 19, 2003 Pathogens Program Approved by: Lisa Tomko

1. Purpose

In accordance with the Cal-OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens standard 8 CCR 5193, the Orange County Sanitation District (district) has developed the following exposure control plan to eliminate or minimize employee occupational exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials as detailed in the Bloodborne Pathogens standard. This Plan applies to employees who have been designated part of the Medical Unit.

2. Definitions

Blood Human blood, human blood components, and products made from human blood. Bloodborne Pathogenic microorganisms that are present in human blood and Pathogens can cause disease in humans. These pathogens include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Contaminated The presence or the reasonably anticipated presence of blood or other potentially infectious materials on a surface or in or on an item. Decontamination The use of physical or chemical means to remove, inactivate, or destroy bloodborne pathogens on a surface or item to the point where they are no longer capable of transmitting infectious particles and the surface or item is rendered safe for handling, use, or disposal Exposure A specific eye, mouth, other mucous membrane, non-intact skin, Incident or parenteral contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials that results from the performance of an employee's duties.

Rev. 0 Hard Copy Is Uncontrolled Date 11/19/03 3 of 15 g:\wp.dta\agenda\board agenda reports\2003 board agenda reports\1103\item 14(e) 1.doc Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

Hand washing A facility providing an adequate supply of running potable water, Facility soap and single use towels or hot air drying machines. Occupational Reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane, or Exposure parenteral contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials that may result from the performance of an employee's duties. Other Potentially The following human body fluids: semen,vaginal secretions, Infected Materials cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, (OPIM) peritoneal fluid, amniotic fluid, saliva in dental procedures, any other body fluid that is visibly contaminated with blood such as saliva or vomitus, and all body fluids in situations where it is difficult or impossible to differentiate between body fluids such as emergency response. Parenteral Piercing mucous membranes or the skin barrier through such Contact events as needlesticks, human bites, cuts, and abrasions. Sharp Any object used or encountered in the industries covered by subsection (a) that can be reasonably anticipated to penetrate the skin or any other part of the body, and to result in an exposure incident, including, but not limited to, needle devices, scalpels, lancets, broken glass, broken capillary tubes, exposed ends of dental wires and dental knives, drills and burs. Source Individual Any individual, living or dead, whose blood or OPIM may be a source of occupational exposure to the employee. Examples include, but are not limited to, hospital and clinical patients; clients in institutions for the developmentally disabled; trauma victims; clients of drug and alcohol treatment facilities; residents of hospices and nursing homes; human remains; and individuals who donate or sell blood or blood components. Universal An approach to infection control. According to the concept of Precautions Universal Precautions, all human blood and certain human body fluids are treated as if known to be infectious for HIV, HBV, HCV, and other bloodborne pathogens. Work Practice Controls that reduce the likelihood of exposure by defining the Controls manner in which a task is performed.

3. Exposure Determination

Cal-OSHA regulations (8 CCR 5193(f)) require that “employers

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure, and post- exposure evaluation and follow-up for bloodborne pathogens exposure to all employees who have had an exposure incident.” Cal OSHA also exempts “Designated first aid providers who have occupational exposure if the following conditions exist: 1. The primary job assignment of such designated first aid providers is not the rendering of first aid. 2. Any first aid rendered by such persons is rendered only as a collateral duty responding solely to injuries resulting from workplace incidents, generally at the location where the incident occurred.” In light of this requirement and exemption, the District is designating the following group as having an occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens. 1. Members of the District’s Medical Unit.

4. General Methods of Compliance

1. Universal precautions will be observed at the district in order to prevent contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials. A. This means that all blood or OPIM will be considered infectious regardless of the perceived status of the source individual. 2. The Safety and Health Division in coordination with the Medical Unit conducts ongoing evaluation of tasks and medical devices that carry a risk of exposure and implements safer medical devices whenever feasible. 3. The following work rules apply where there is a potential for contact with blood or OPIM: A. Hand and Body Washing (1) Hand washing facilities are available to employees who are exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials. (2) Employees shall wash hands after removal of

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

personal protective gloves and whenever there is a likelihood of contamination. In addition, any contaminated skin area will be washed as soon as possible. (3) When hand washing facilities are not readily available, the use of waterless hand washing products is permitted as an interim means of washing the hands or other parts of the body after contamination with blood or OPIM. (4) If blood or other potentially infectious material contacts mucous membranes, those areas shall be washed or flushed with water as appropriate as soon as possible following contact. B. Other Work Practices (1) Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics or lip balm, and handling contact lenses are prohibited in work areas where there is a reasonable likelihood of occupational exposure. (2) Food and drink must not be kept in refrigerators, freezers, shelves, and cabinets or on countertops or bench tops where blood or other potentially infectious materials are present. (3) Mouth pipetting/suctioning of blood or other potentially infectious materials is prohibited. C. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (1) All PPE used at this facility will be provided without cost to employees. (2) PPE will be chosen based on the anticipated exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials. a. The PPE will be considered appropriate only if it does not permit blood or other potentially infectious materials to pass through or reach the employees’ clothing, skin, eyes, mouth, or other mucous membranes under normal conditions of use and for the duration of time, which the protective equipment will be used.

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

(3) Employees will receive training on the appropriate use of PPE provided for specific tasks. (4) The personal protective equipment listed in attachment 1 is provided for workers. (5) If required PPE is not available, contact the Safety and Health Division who will insure that supplies are replenished. D. Housekeeping Contaminated surfaces must be decontaminated by the Medical Unit with an approved disinfectant as soon as possible after contamination with blood or OPIM.

5. Hepatitis B Vaccine

1. Hepatitis B vaccine shall be offered to all members of the Medical Unit, at no cost to the employee unless: A. the employee has previously received the series B. antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune C. medical reasons prevent taking the vaccination; or D. the employee chooses not to participate 2. Hepatitis B vaccine shall be offered to all employees at no cost who have had an exposure to blood or OPIM unless: A. The employee has previously received the series B. Antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune C. Medical reasons prevent taking the vaccination; or D. The employee chooses not to participate 3. Employees will be provided with information on Hepatitis B vaccinations addressing its safety, benefits, efficacy, methods of administration and availability. 4. All occupationally exposed employees are strongly encouraged to receive the Hepatitis B vaccination series and post-vaccination antibody testing.

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

A. If an employee chooses to decline HB vaccination, the employee must sign a copy of the declination statement. (1) The copy will be kept in the employee’s confidential medical record. (2) Employees who decline may request and obtain the vaccination at a later date at no cost. 5. The district shall notify all employees who receive hepatitis B vaccine of the location of the clinic providing the vaccine. A. Employees shall receive vaccine during normal working hours or be compensated during non-working hours.

6. Post Exposure Monitoring and Follow Up

1. Evaluation and Management of Exposure Incidents A. Post-Exposure Management (1) Wounds and skin sites that have been in contact with blood or OPIM should be washed with soap and water; mucous membranes should be flushed with water. (2) Immediately report all exposure incidents to the employee's supervisor or the Safety and Health Division. (3) The Safety and Health Division will provide a doctor for a confidential medical evaluation to all exposed employees. a. It is important that employees receive a prompt medical evaluation because HBIG, hepatitis B vaccine, and HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) are most likely to be effective if administered as soon after exposure as possible. (4) If the employee does not give consent for HIV serological testing during collection of blood for baseline testing, preserve the baseline blood

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

sample for at least 90 days. a. If the exposed employee elects to have the baseline sample tested during this waiting period, perform testing as soon as feasible (5) The person (if known) whose blood or body fluid is the source of an exposure will be tested for HBV, HCV, and HIV infection as soon as feasible. a. When the source is already known to be infected with HBV, HCV, or HIV then testing need not be repeated. (6) Information from the medical record at the time of the exposure (e.g., laboratory test results, admitting diagnosis, or previous medical history) or the source person, will be collected to help confirm or exclude bloodborne infection. (7) HBV, HCV, and/or HIV testing shall be performed if the infection status of the source person is unknown. (8) Results of source testing shall be provided to the employee, and the employee shall be informed of all applicable laws and regulations concerning disclosure of the identity and infectious status of the source. (9) The health department will be consulted in the event that consent for source testing cannot be obtained (Orange County Health Care Agency). B. Health Care Professional Follow-Up 4. The Safety and Health Division will ensure that health care professionals responsible for employee’s hepatitis B vaccination and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up are given a copy of Cal-OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard. 5. The Safety and Health Division will ensure that the health care professional evaluating an employee after an exposure incident receives the following: A. A description of the employee’s job duties relevant to

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

the exposure incident B. Route(s) of exposure C. Circumstances of exposure D. If possible, results of the source individual’s blood test E. Relevant employee medical records, including vaccination status

2. The Safety and Health Division will provide the employee with a copy of the evaluating health care professional’s written opinion within 15 days after completion of the evaluation. 3. The written opinion for post-exposure evaluation and follow- up will be limited to whether or not the employee has been informed of the results of the health evaluation and of any health conditions which may require further evaluation and treatment. A. All other diagnoses must remain confidential and are not to be included in the written report to the district.

7. Review of Exposure Incidents

1. The employee’s supervisor and Safety and Health Division shall review the circumstances of all exposure incidents which will be reviewed to determine: A. Why the exposure incident occurred; B. Type and brand of device involved; C. If procedures were being followed; and D. If procedures, protocols, and/or training need to be revised. 2. If it is determined that revisions need to be made, the Safety and Health Division will ensure that appropriate changes are made to this exposure control plan. 3. Documentation of this evaluation should accompany the exposure report.

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

8. Training and Communication

1. All employees who have occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens will receive training at the time of initial assignment and at least annually thereafter. 2. The Safety and Health Division shall be responsible for conducting training. 3. Training will include: A. Information on the epidemiology, symptoms, and transmission of bloodborne pathogen diseases. B. A copy and explanation of the standard. C. An explanation of the District’s exposure control plan and how to obtain a copy. D. An explanation of methods to recognize tasks and other activities that may involve exposure to blood and OPIM, including what constitutes an exposure incident. E. An explanation of the use and limitations of engineering controls, work practices, and PPE. F. An explanation of the types, uses, location, removal, handling, decontamination, and disposal of PPE. G. An explanation of the basis for PPE selection. H. Information on the hepatitis B vaccine, including information on its efficacy, safety, method of administration, the benefits of being vaccinated, and that the vaccine will be offered free of charge. I. Information on the appropriate actions to take and persons to contact in an emergency involving blood or OPIM. J. An explanation of the procedure to follow if an exposure incident occurs, including the method of reporting the incident and the medical follow-up that will be made available. K. Information on the post-exposure evaluation and follow- up that the employer is required to provide for the

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

employee following an exposure incident. L. An explanation of the signs and labels and/or color coding required by the standard and used at the District. M. An opportunity for interactive questions and answers with the person conducting the training session. 4. Training records will be completed for each employee upon completion of training. These documents will be kept with the employee’s records and will include: A. Dates of the training sessions. B. Contents or a summary of the training sessions. C. Names and qualifications of persons conducting the training sessions. D. Names and job titles of all persons attending the training sessions. 5. Training records will be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years from the date on which the training occurred. 6. Employee training records will be provided upon request to the employee or the employee’s authorized representative within 15 working days.

9. Medical Records

1. Medical Records A. The Safety and Health Division is responsible for maintenance of the required medical records. (1) Records are maintained in the Plant No. 1 Safety and Health Division Office. B. Medical records are maintained for each employee with occupational exposure in compliance with 8 CCR 3204 and SAFETY-POL-405, "Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records" and will include: (1) The name and social security number of the employee

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

(2) A copy of the employee’s hepatitis B vaccinations and any medical records relative to the employee’s ability to receive vaccination (3) A copy of all results of examinations, medical testing, and follow-up procedures as required by the bloodborne pathogens standard (4) A copy of all health care professional’s written opinion(s) as required by the bloodborne pathogens standard C. All employee medical records will be kept confidential and will not be disclosed or reported without the employee’s express written consent to any person within or outside the workplace except as required by the standard or other legal provisions. D. Employee medical records shall be maintained for at least the duration of employment plus 30 years. E. Employee medical records will be provided upon request of the employee or to anyone having written consent of the employee within 15 working days.

10. Program Administration and Evaluation

This Exposure Control Plan Program shall be evaluated annually to ensure that it is effective in providing adequate protection against blood and OPIM. The following steps shall be followed to conduct this program review: 1. The Safety and Health Division shall determine if regulations or national consensus standards have changed since the last annual program review. A. Review Federal OSHA Standards, interpretations and documents. B. Review consensus standards. 2. The Safety and Health Division shall convene a Safety Sub Committee to review the current Exposure Control Plan, proposed changes to State and Federal Regulations and national consensus standards and recommend changes to

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

the district’s Exposure Control Plan as required. 3. The Safety and Health Division shall have 30 days to make minor program changes, and 60 days in the case of major program re-writes. 4. Bloodborne Pathogen Program and Exposure Control Plan reviews shall start by October 15 of each year.

11. References

SAFETY-POL-405, Employee Access to Medical Records Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 5193, Bloodborne Pathogens Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Section 3204, Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records

12. Attachments

Attachment 1 : Personal Protective Equipment Available to Medical Unit Members

Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne Pathogens SAFETY-POL-113

Attachment 1 Personal Protective Equipment Available to Medical Unit Members

PPE Use Guidelines Disposable Gloves Gloves shall be worn where it is reasonably anticipated that employees will have hand contact with blood, other potentially infectious materials, non-intact skin, and mucous membranes. Disposable gloves used at this facility are not be washed or decontaminated for re-use and are to be replaced as soon as practical when they become contaminated or as soon as possible if they are torn, punctured, or when their ability to function as a barrier is compromised Safety Glasses w/side shields Appropriate face and eye protection must be worn when splashes, sprays, spatters, or droplets of blood or other potentially infectious materials pose a hazard to the eyes, nose or mouth Apron Gowns, aprons, and other protective body clothing shall be worn whenever there is a risk of splash to the body Other All garments, which are penetrated by blood, shall be removed immediately or as soon as possible. All personal protective equipment will be removed and placed in a designated area or container prior to leaving the work area

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-94 14(f) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources

SUBJECT: Amended Deferred Compensation Plan

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-27, Authorizing the Director of Human Resources to Appoint or Employ Agents or Advisors to Implement and Administer District’s Deferred Compensation Plan Loan Program.

SUMMARY

In May 2003, the Board of Directors adopted the Amended Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and employees of the District. Within that amended plan is a loan provision whereby participants may take a loan from their account.

Tonight we are seeking Board approval for the three providers Lincoln National, Valic and International City/County Management Association (ICMA) to act as plan administrators solely for the purpose of administering the loan provision. The Director of Human Resources would remain plan administrator of the deferred compensation program as a whole.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

Loans would be repaid by the participants directly to the appropriate provider including interest. There will be no cost to the District to administer this program and no fees to be paid to the providers.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Resolution

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(f).Deferred Comp.doc Revised 10.28.03 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 03-27

AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES TO APPOINT OR EMPLOY AGENTS OR ADVISORS TO IMPLEMENT AND ADMINISTER DISTRICT’S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN LOAN PROGRAM

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTOS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES TO APPOINT OR EMPLOY AGENTS OR ADVISORS TO IMPLEMENT AND ADMINISTER THE DISTRICT’S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN LOAN PROGRAM

WHEREAS, on May 28, 2003, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 03-10, approving the Orange County Sanitation District Amended Deferred Compensation Plan [2003] for Officers and Employees of the District (“Plan”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the District appointed the Director of Human Resources to act as the Plan Administrator; and

WHEREAS, the Plan authorizes the Plan Administrator to make loans on behalf of the District from the Trust Fund to Plan Participants, according to specific terms and conditions as the District may prescribe; and

WHEREAS, the Plan further authorizes the Plan Administrator to appoint or employ for the Plan any agent or advisor necessary to assist in discharging the Plan Administrator’s duties; and

WHEREAS, the Plan Administrator desires to employ the services of agents or advisors to implement and administer the District’s Deferred Compensation Plan Loan Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District,

DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER:

Section 1: The above Recitals are true and correct.

Section 2: That pursuant to Exhibit “A” of the District’s Deferred Compensation Plan (Resolution No. OCSD 03-10), the Plan Administrator is hereby authorized to appoint or employ the services of Lincoln National, Valic and International City/County Management Association to act as agents or advisors for the purpose of implementing and administering the District’s Deferred Compensation Plan Loan Program.

Section 3: The Plan Administrator, or her designee, is hereby authorized to execute, on behalf of the District, any and all documents necessary to effect said Loan Program, with the approval as to form by the District’s General Counsel.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held November 19, 2003.

______CHAIR

ATTEST:

______BOARD SECRETARY

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(f).1.doc Revised 10.28.03 Page 2 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-95 14(g) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Lisa Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager

SUBJECT: Classification Structure Adjustments

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Adopt Resolution No. OCSD 03-28, Amending Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, Amending Human Resources and Policies Procedures Manual, providing for:

1. Create the Automotive/Heavy Equipment Assistant classification at pay range 53 ($16.772 - $20.965).

2. Delete the Lead Collection Facilities Worker classification at pay grade 66 ($23.123 - $28.904)

SUMMARY

From time to time, adjustments need to be made to classification structures. New classifications can be added and existing classifications deleted based on the changing needs of the organization. Staff is proposing two adjustments that need to be made to the classification and compensation structure.

1. During the FY03/04 budget process, the Plant Facilities Maintenance Division submitted justification for an additional position to serve as a motor pool assistant/dispatcher. This position would assist with washing, inspecting and checking motor pool vehicles in and out, data entry and entry level automotive work; work currently being performed by higher level employees. The additional headcount was approved during the budget process. Survey data for this classification for the thirteen comparison agencies places the range maximum at pay grade 53 or approximately 20% below the existing Mechanic classification.

2. For the past several years, employees in the job family of Collection Facilities Worker have been transitioning to the Maintenance Worker, Mechanic, Senior Mechanic and Lead Mechanic classifications through the reclassification or promotional processes. At this time there are no incumbents in the Lead Collection Facilities Worker classification and it can be deleted from the classification listing.

Human Resources Policy C10.10 Exhibit A, Salary Schedule has been updated to reflect the proposed modifications and is attached for review and acceptance as Attachment 2.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

N/A

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

There is no additional cost for these proposed changes to the classification structure. The cost for the position of motor assistant/dispatcher was already included in the FY03/04 budget process.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. OCSD 03–28. 2. Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.10, Exhibit A, Salary Schedule.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(g).HRP&P.doc Revised: 8/20/01 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 03-28

AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. OCSD 98-33

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT AMENDING HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

*********************

The Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District,

DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:

Section 1: That Exhibit “A” of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 is hereby amended by amending Policy No. C10.10, Classification and Compensation set forth in Attachment No. 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2: That all other terms and conditions of Resolution No. OCSD 98-33, as previously recommended, shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 3: That all future amendments to Resolution No. OCSD 98-33 be made by Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 19, 2003.

______Chair

ATTEST:

______Board Secretary

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(g).1.doc Exhibit A Attachment 2

Orange County Sanitation District Classification and Compensation Plan Sorted by Bargaining Group

CMMS Technician II 75 $28.874 $32.483 $36.092 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Electrical Technician 75 $28.874 $32.483 $36.092 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Instrumentation Technician 75 $28.874 $32.483 $36.092 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Power Plant Operator 75 $28.874 $32.483 $36.092 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) CMMS Technician I 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Electrical Technician II 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Instrumentation Technician II 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Mechanic 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Welder/Fabricator 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Power Plant Operator II 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Senior Plant Operator 71 $26.155 $29.425 $32.694 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Machinist 68 $24.286 $27.322 $30.358 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Automotive/Heavy Equipment Technician 67 $23.700 $26.663 $29.625 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Equipment Operator 67 $23.700 $26.663 $29.625 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Senior Mechanic 67 $23.700 $26.663 $29.625 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Welder/Fabricator 67 $23.700 $26.663 $29.625 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Collection Facilities Worker 66 $23.123 $26.013 $28.904 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Lead Facilities Worker 66 $23.123 $26.013 $28.904 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Plant Operator 66 $23.123 $26.013 $28.904 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Power Plant Operator I 66 $23.123 $26.013 $28.904 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Electrical Technician I 65 $22.555 $25.375 $28.194 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Instrumentation Technician I 65 $22.555 $25.375 $28.194 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Senior Maintenance Worker 64 $22.006 $24.757 $27.508 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Facilities Worker/Builder 62 $20.945 $23.563 $26.181 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Facilities Worker/Painter 62 $20.945 $23.563 $26.181 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Mechanic 61 $20.432 $22.986 $25.540 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Maintenance Worker 60 $19.938 $22.431 $24.923 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Control Center Technician 58 $18.978 $21.351 $23.723 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Operator-In-Training 58 $18.978 $21.351 $23.723 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501) Automotive/Heavy Equipment Assistant 53 $16.772 $18.869 $20.965 Non-Exempt Operations & Main (501)

1 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-96 14(h) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Lisa L. Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Jeff Reed, Human Resources Manager

SUBJECT: 2003 November Reclassifications and Equity Adjustments

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Approve the reclassifications of eight District employees, the upgrading of one vacant position and an equity adjustment for one employee.

SUMMARY

According to Human Resources Policy and Procedure C10.10, reclassification requests are considered twice a year, during the annual budget process and again in November. Reclassification paperwork was submitted on a total of eleven positions; nine of these positions have incumbents and the remaining two were for upgrades of existing, vacant positions. In addition to the reclassification requests, four equity adjustment requests were submitted. Human Resources reviewed the justification for each position and discussed with the appropriate Department Head for concurrence. Subsequently, Human Resources is recommending that ten of the requests be approved (Attachment 1).

Five of the requests will result in classification changes for current employees effective immediately. These five employees have met the four criteria outlined in the Reclassification Guidelines which are summarized below:

1. The incumbent has been in the position that has been reclassified for at least 6 months 2. The incumbent is qualified for the classification to which the position was classified 3. The incumbent has been performing the duties of the classification to which the position was classified for at least 6 months 4. The incumbent’s classification is not being reclassified from a non-supervisory to a supervisory classification

Four of the requests will result in either future reclassifications (minimum requirements and/or successful completion of test must be achieved) or promotional opportunities (adhering to Human Resources Policy and Procedure B150.00).

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

N/A

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

The additional cost for reclassifications and position upgrades will not be greater than $30,352 for the remainder of FY03/04.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. (sufficient funds exist). Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

ALTERNATIVES

Employees will not be reclassified and their duties will be reviewed and adjusted to be consistent with their current classifications. Vacant positions will remain the same.

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Reclassifications/Equity Adjustments Submitted For November 2003 Cycle

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 ATTACHMENT 1 RECLASSIFICATIONS/EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS SUBMITTED FOR NOVEMBER 2003 CYCLE

FY03/04 Employee Division Current Title Proposed Title Recommendation Costs Cabral, Jennifer 130 Public Information Specialist Sr Public Information Specialist Deny, does not meet the minimum qualifications for n/a experience

Baez, Jesus 230 Storekeeper I Storekeeper II Approve reclassification $1,400

Tolsma, Kimberly 520 Human Resources Assistant Human Resources Analyst Approve reclassification $1,605

Morrison, Peter 530 Safety & Health Representative Sr Safety & Health Representative Approve reclassification upon successful completion $2,474 of certification program

Min, Dong 632 Senior Laboratory Analyst Principal Laboratory Analyst Approve reclassification $2,143

Kleinbergs, Mila 640 Associate Engineer III Engineer Approve reclassification for March 2004 $1,423

Sullivan, Moira 850 Library Technician Engineering Assistant I Approve reclassification $2,049

Lopez, Pinky 910 Administrative Assistant Executive Assistant Approve reclassification for January 2004 $1,364

Dumity, Robert 930 IT Analyst III Senior IT Analyst Approve reclassification $2,712

No incumbent 930 Senior IT Analyst Principal IT Analyst Deny request to upgrade position $0

No incumbent 930 IT Technician II IT Analyst III Approve upgrade of position, will be posted as a $13,418 promotional opportunity

Jones, Larry 420 CMMS Technician II Equity adjustment Deny equity adjustment n/a

Hamilton, Robert 430 CMMS Technician II Equity adjustment Deny equity adjustment n/a

Matthews, Terry 850 CMMS Technician II Equity adjustment Approve 1 step equity adjustment $1,764

Reeves, Richard 850 CMMS Technician II Equity adjustment Deny equity adjustment n/a $30,352

11/13/2003 Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/2003 11/19/2003 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-97 14(i) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary Streed, Director of Finance Originator: Michael White, Controller

SUBJECT: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Receive, file and approve the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2003, prepared by staff and audited by Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants.

SUMMARY

The District's independent auditors, Moreland & Associates, have completed their examination of the District’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2003, and have again issued an unqualified opinion. Each year, the FAHR Committee reviews the results of the audit and the corresponding Auditor's report to the Committee. Michael Moreland, Partner, will attend the meeting to respond to any questions of Directors.

This year, staff has again prepared the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that includes the audited financial statements. For the last nine years, the District has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This year's report will again be submitted to GFOA for their review in anticipation of another award.

The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, including the Auditor's opinion letter, the Auditor's Report to the Committee, the Auditor's Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and the Auditor's Appropriations Limit Report are attached.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

N/A

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(i).CAFR.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

ALTERNATIVES

N/A

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2003. 2. Report on Compliance and on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. 3. Auditors’ Report to the FAHR Committee. 4. Independent Accountants’ Report on Agreed-Upon Procedures Applied to Appropriations Limit Worksheets.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(i).CAFR.doc Revised: 8/20/98 Page 2

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11/12/03 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-98 14(j) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND INVESTMENT

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Authorize staff to invest the Debt Service Reserve Fund for the 2003 Certificates of Participation through a competitive selection process to be conducted by the District’s independent Financial Advisor, Public Resources Advisory Group, in accordance with the District’s Investment Policy.

SUMMARY

The 2003 Certificate of Participation issue resulted in a Debt Service Reserve Fund of nearly $27 million. This fund is managed by the Trustee and is segregated from the funds under the control of the District. Currently, these funds are invested very short-term and very safely. The interest earnings on these funds are well below the fixed rate that we pay on the COPs.

Longer term investments will provide higher interest earnings, potentially even higher than our COP costs. Subject to certain limitations, this “arbitrage” is legal, generally because the earnings on our construction proceeds from the COP issue will be so low.

Public Resources Advisory Group, and others, have proposed various investment vehicles. PRAG has suggested the lowest cost and least risky combination. They have also proposed a strategy that will allow the District to take advantage of anticipated increased interest rates in the near future.

The enclosed Staff Report explains the different options and risks and recommends the PRAG proposal.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

The 2003 Certificates of Participation were authorized and issued in August, 2003.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

The costs to conduct the bidding process will be paid to PRAG by the winning bidder. There will be minor legal costs, less than $10,000, to prepare the necessary documents.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(j).DebtServResFund.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1 All investments involve certain risks. Generally these risks are expected to increase as the anticipated yield increases. This discussion will be limited to the three major investment risk factors that we see in the alternative DSRF investment options, principal risk, interest rate risk and counterparty risk. A brief description of each of these risks is shown in the table below.

Type of Risk Description of Risk Principal Risk Risk that the investment may become devalued and worth less than face value before it is redeemed

Interest Rate Risk Risk that interest rates may have declined when an investment matures and a new investment must be purchased at a lower yield

Counterparty Risk Risk that the security provider will not be able to perform, subjecting the District to principal and interest rate risk

Each of the investments briefly discussed above has a varying exposure to each of these three types of risk. Some are more exposed to one or more, and others are less exposed to those or to others. The following table provides a brief and simplistic overview of these relationships.

Investment Principal Risk Interest Rate Risk Counterparty Risk Cash None Yes. Short term rates None will change regularly.

Short-term Securities Some. As interest Yes. As securities None. Investments are rates increase, the mature and proceeds typically “Federal Debt”. value of the DSRF need to be reinvested decreases. at the current rates.

Rolling Treasuries or None. Investments Yes. Upon failure of Yes. Mitigated by Agencies/ Forward are “Federal Debt”. counterparty with collateral, rating Delivery Agreement insufficient collateral. downgrade provisions and possessing security Guaranteed Some. Mitigated by Some. Only if Yes. Mitigated by Investment Contract collateral counterparty fails or collateral and rating (GIC) requirements, but GIC is shorter than downgrade provisions. counterparty can fail. debt repayment.

ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives are discussed in the enclosed Staff Report.

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1) Staff Report

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(j).DebtServResFund.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2 November 12, 2003

STAFF REPORT

2003 COPs Debt Service Reserve Fund Preliminary Staff Report re Investing the DSR

Background

In August 2003, the District issued $280 million of certificates of participation (COPs) to partially fund the capital improvement program for 2003-04, and to reimburse reserves for some capital outlay in the recent past. Approximately 10% of the original issue was deposited with the Trustee as a Debt Service Reserve Fund (DSRF). This $27 million provides the certificate holders with added security in the unlikely event of a shortfall or untimely District installment payments.

Subject to certain legal constraints, the DSRF can be invested so that interest earnings can completely offset the costs of borrowing to fund the DSRF. In the case of the 2003 COPs, earnings in excess of the cost may be allowable because of the expected negative arbitrage on the Construction Fund.

Investment Options

The investment of the DSRF must comply with the District’s investment policy and with the terms of the COP issue, including any special requirements of the COP insurer. Perhaps most importantly, the investment must meet our three policy priorities of safety, liquidity and yield, in that order.

As always, these three priorities are somewhat at conflict, especially in today’s low interest rate environment. The first two are easily met by investing in cash or in short- term securities. The downside of this approach is that these very short-term rates today are much lower than the cost of the COPs and that this “interest rate risk” or “reinvestment risk” exposure, would occur regularly as the short-term securities matured and the resulting cash would need to be reinvested. Of course, if short-term interest rates increase significantly over the next 30 year period, this risk could actually become an advantage. However, it seems to be much more likely (and prudent to assume) that the earnings from this strategy would not provide the maximum allowable returns over time, especially given the current low short-term interest rate environment.

Longer term investments will provide greater yields. These longer term investments could be for terms from 5-years to 30-years, to match the repayment schedule. Several longer term options are available and one common option for borrowers is to enter into a “guaranteed investment contract” (GIC) with a highly-rated collateralized counterparty. An alternative that provides most of the benefits of a long-term investment with less of the risks is a Forward Delivery Agreement.

OCSD P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Debt Service Reserve Fund Investment Page 2 of 5 November 19, 2003

Risk Analysis

All investments involve certain risks. Generally these risks are expected to increase as the anticipated yield increases. This discussion will be limited to the three major investment risk factors that we see in the alternative DSRF investment options, principal risk, interest rate risk and counterparty risk. A brief description of each of these risks is shown in the table below.

Type of Risk Description of Risk Principal Risk Risk that the investment may become devalued and worth less than face value before it is redeemed

Interest Rate Risk Risk that interest rates may have declined when an investment matures and a new investment with a lower yield must be purchased

Counterparty Risk Risk that the security provider will not be able to perform, subjecting the District to principal and interest rate risk

Each of the investments briefly discussed above has a varying exposure to each of these three types of risk. Some are more exposed to one or more and others are less exposed to those or to others. The following table provides a brief and simplistic overview of these relationships.

Investment Principal Risk Interest Rate Risk Counterparty Risk Cash None Yes. Short term rates None will change regularly.

Short-term Some. As interest Yes. As securities None. Investments are Securities rates increase, the mature and proceeds typically “Federal Debt”. value of the DSRF need to be reinvested decreases. at the current rates.

Rolling None. Investments Yes. Upon failure of Yes. Mitigated by Treasuries or are “Federal Debt”. counterparty with collateral and rating Agencies/ insufficient collateral. downgrade provisions & Forward Delivery possession of the Agreement security. Guaranteed Some. Mitigated by Some. Only if Yes. Mitigated by Investment collateral counterparty fails or collateral and rating Contract (GIC) requirements, but GIC is shorter than downgrade provisions. counterparty can fail. debt repayment period.

While not traditionally considered an investment related risk, there is another factor that affects these options differently. This is the opportunity to take the cash out of the DSRF and to provide the certificate holders with the security they desire by purchasing an insurance policy. These policies are typically called DSRF surety policies. These policies are attractive when their premium is less than the cost of maintaining the DSRF, they are not attractive if the DSRF earnings are greater than the cost of funds. However, Debt Service Reserve Fund Investment Page 3 of 5 November 19, 2003

they can be a fairly low-cost source of funds if the DSRF balance is needed for the capital improvement program in a future high interest rate environment.

In a rising interest rate environment, the longer term alternatives, such as the GIC, would be at a disadvantage should the District wish to substitute a surety for the DSRF cash. The reason is that the counterparty would demand to be made whole for its future investment earnings (arbitrage) decline that would result from losing a relatively low-cost (compared to the then-current interest rates) source of investment funds from the District’s DSRF deposit.

Performance or Yield

DSRF investments that earn a variable rate of interest may be expected to continue to earn low rates for the foreseeable future, causing the District to generate substantial “negative arbitrage.” “Negative arbitrage” is the term applied to the situation where the cost to borrow funds exceeds the interest earned from investing those funds. Maintaining the DSRF in “cash” will certainly be a variable rate investment as the investments will change each day. This will be the most costly, but safest option for the District. Currently this option would result in a cost to the District of about 3.5%.

Short-term securities can also be considered as earning a variable rate of interest as they would mature every six months to coincide with the principal and interest payments on the new COPs. The funds from the maturity, or sale, of the securities would need to be invested at whatever the current interest rate would be at that time. Currently this option would result in a cost to the District of about 3.0%.

Rolling Treasury or Agency Agreements are a relatively new product in the municipal market; they have been around for only about 10 years. These are also sometimes called a Forward Delivery/Purchase Agreement. Typically these agreements allow an issuer to earn a fairly high fixed-rate for the life of the agreement. While the agreement is long-term, there are certain provisions that look more like a short-term agreement. On every payment date the provider, or counterparty, is required to deliver cash or securities that will mature on or before the next maturity date in an amount at least equal to the debt service reserve requirement. In this way, the District has a short-term investment that will mature when needed and is expected to be replaced when it is not. The provider expects to have stream of income from the sale of the short-term investment for 30 years and offers a long-term rate. If the provider goes out of business, the District still has the short-term securities. Currently this option would provide minimal positive arbitrage on the DSRF of about .2%.

The uncollateralized GIC alternative provides the greatest potential yield to the District. Of course, that comes with the highest risk. Existing District GICs contain provisions to protect the District from these risks and thus have reduced the potential yield. Most significant of these protections is requiring that the counterparty provide collateral for the DSRF and further requiring the counterparty to provide additional collateral or to refund the principal plus accrued interest if their credit rating is downgraded. These collateral requirements change the nature of the GIC into a collateralized GIC. The DSRFs for other District COPs are currently in collateralized GICs. The major difference between the GIC and the FDA is who has possession of the security. In a GIC, the counterparty Debt Service Reserve Fund Investment Page 4 of 5 November 19, 2003

has possession and in the event of default, the District could lose the principal. Currently this option would provide minimal positive arbitrage on the DSRF of about .2%.

Cost to Obtain an Investment

As might be expected, the cost to obtain these various investment options differs for each. Generally the cost increases as the potential reward increases. For example, the out-of-pocket cost to keep the DSRF in cash, or daily repurchase agreements, is nearly nothing and is included in the Trustee’s fees. The cost to obtain a GIC is somewhat higher as bid specifications must be prepared and a competitive selection process must be completed.

The cost of the process is paid by the winning investment provider; the District does not pay anything other than minor legal costs. Of course the provider adjusts the interest bid to recover costs, thus effectively reducing the District’s income. Staff has received proposals to solicit and select a provider for reduced rates that range from $25,000 to $45,000.

Procurement Options

The selection of the investment provider will be through a competitive process, it will not be a sole source. The investment provider will meet the credit standards that the District establishes. The investment agreement will contain the terms that the District specifies. The options revolve around who conducts the competitive process and is paid the fee the District agrees to by the winning investment provider. The firm that provides this service is called a “bidding agent.”

Staff has not conducted a competitive process to select a bidding agent, but we do have qualified proposals. The fees vary as noted above, but are minimal compared to the investment potential over 30 years, approximately $40 million, and are paid by the investment provider in any case. This procurement seems to be a perfect example of when a decision should be based upon service rather than cost.

One proposal has been received from the Grant Street Group using their MuniAuction website. This firm is located in Pittsburg. Their unique product allows potential investment providers to input their bids into a website and to be immediately advised of their ranking among the other bidders. This process is expected to result in an on-line auction with increasing rates until the close of bids.

Another proposal has been received from Bond Logistix, L.L.C. This firm has offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas and New York. Bond Logistix also uses the internet to obtain bids, but the bidders are not advised of their ranking until the close of bids. This process is expected to result in the highest yield as the bidder is required to start at their “bottom line” or to risk missing the deal.

The final proposal is from Public Resources Advisory Group. PRAG serves as the District’s independent financial advisor and has offices in Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia. Their selection process is the same as Bond Logistix’s but their fee is lower. Debt Service Reserve Fund Investment Page 5 of 5 November 19, 2003

Recommendation

The staff recommendation is two-fold.

First, we recommend a Forward Delivery Agreement for the duration of the DSRF. This vehicle will provide interest earnings sufficient to cover our cost of funds, similar to the earnings from a collateralized GIC. Staff is making this recommendation because the earnings are nearly the same while the counterparty risk is minimal. The risk is reduced because the District’s Trustee will always have a short-term Treasury or Agency obligation in hand.

Secondly, we recommend the selection of Public Resources Advisory Group (PRAG) as the bidding agent. PRAG is a local firm that is convenient to work with and they are intimately familiar with our long-term financial plan. PRAG has proposed to provide bidding agent services for the lowest of the three proposals received and is the only firm to evaluate products other than the standard GIC.

GGS G:\wp.dta\fin\210\streed\AR Staff report DSRF investments 10-2003.doc

Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. FAHR COMMITTEE 11-12-03 11-19-03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT FAHR03-99 14(k) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: Lisa L. Tomko, Director of Human Resources Originator: Lisa Arosteguy, HR Supervisor

SUBJECT: Rideshare Program Enhancements

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve two (2) additional vanpool routes for the Rideshare Program utilizing existing vans; and

2. Approve implementation of rideshare incentives in an effort to comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202 and meet established Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) targeted goal, at the Board’s discretion and subject to change by the Board at any time.

SUMMARY

In compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Rule 2202, On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options, the District recently submitted its Triennial Employee Commute Reduction Plan (rideshare plan). The SCAQMD approved the District’s plan although data submitted showed that the District was not meeting the Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) targeted goal of 1.5 persons per vehicle as specified by SCAQMD. A proposed amendment to Rule 2202, however, would make AVR attainment mandatory by 2005. The District’s current AVR is 1.4.

The employee rideshare survey, conducted in May 2003, indicated that the District’s vanpools were the most effective rideshare option in terms of eliminating vehicles on the road and entering the plant. The District has five (5) operating vanpools; three (3) for South County cities and two (2) for Riverside County. All are 12-passenger vehicles. Employees enjoying the benefits of vanpool ridesharing are currently covering approximately 90% of the entire cost of operating and maintaining the van. The cost for participation in the District’s vanpools ranges from $35 - $87 per month, depending on miles driven.

There is currently an extensive rideshare waiting list for the Riverside County vans. Adding another vanpool to the Riverside/Corona area would allow 12 District employees to arrive on site in one vehicle (for a total of up to 36 District employees in three (3) vehicles). In addition, a recent vanpool interest survey indicated that a vanpool originating in the Diamond Bar/57 Freeway area is likely to attract high participation.

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

An additional vanpool route to the Diamond Bar/57 Freeway area would allow another 12 employees to arrive on site in just one vehicle.

Adding incentives consisting of gift certificate awards, public transit subsidies and raffle prizes for other forms of ridesharing is projected to increase participation in carpooling, the use of public transportation and bicycling. These program enhancements will assist the District in achieving its AVR goal while also relieving parking shortages at Plant No. 1 due to construction related projects and associated staffing.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

• In May 1989 the Board approved the District’s initial Employee Commuter Program. • In March 1990 the program was amended to add vanpooling and paid time-off incentives for ridesharing. • In June 1993, the original two vanpools were expanded to five vanpools due to a long waiting list for existing and prospective routes. • In 1996, the paid time-off incentive was discontinued as a cost savings measure.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

1. There is a projected cost of approximately $725 each for adding two vanpools this fiscal year. Currently, approximately 90% of the costs for operating and maintaining the District’s vanpools are sustained by the vanpool participants, and the existing vehicles to be used are fully depreciated. If two new vans are purchased in FY04/05, depreciation costs will be incurred each year up to 100,000 miles.

2. The average monthly cost for adding rideshare incentives is approximately $1,250. The details are included in the attached staff report.

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line item: ) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

See attached Staff Report

ALTERNATIVES

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2

1) Implement vanpools only; no incentives 2) Implement parking fees as a disincentive for employees to drive to work 3) Make no changes to current Rideshare Program

CEQA FINDINGS

N/A

ATTACHMENTS

1. Staff report 2. Vanpool costs 2002

Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3

November 12, 2003

STAFF REPORT

Rideshare Program Enhancements

BACKGROUND

The District is required to comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Rule 2202, On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options. To meet the requirement, the District submits an annual Employee Commute Reduction Plan for the Plant No. 1 worksite demonstrating the effectiveness of its Rideshare Program in reducing the number of commuting vehicles. The plan includes the annual employee rideshare survey data and Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) at Plant No. 1. The District’s AVR goal of 1.5 persons per vehicle specified by the SCAQMD is currently a targeted number. However, a proposed Rule 2202 amendment would make AVR attainment mandatory by 2005. The District’s current AVR is 1.4. An average of 85 employees per day participates in some form of ridesharing including approximately 48 vanpool riders.

In addition, the District is currently experiencing a shortage of parking spaces at Plant No. 1 due to construction projects and associated staffing. Future construction will result in further loss of existing spaces. Reducing the number of employee vehicles arriving on site will alleviate some of the parking shortage.

ANALYSIS

Encouraging employees to leave personal vehicles at home by implementing additional vanpools and rideshare incentives will assist in meeting the more stringent SCAQMD proposed requirements while also easing the current parking shortage. The District currently has five (5) operating vanpools; three (3) going to South County cities and two (2) going to Riverside County. All are 12-passenger vehicles. There is currently an extensive rideshare waiting list for the Riverside County vans. In addition, a recent vanpool interest survey indicated that a vanpool originating in the Diamond Bar/57 Freeway area is likely to attract high participation. Adding two more vanpools would eliminate 18-22 vehicles from entering the plant each day which would assist the District in meeting its AVR goal.

The FY03/04 budget included funds for two new vans to replace the two highest mileage vanpool vehicles. If the vans being replaced were to be kept in service for a few more months rather than being placed for auction immediately, two additional vanpool routes could be initiated this fiscal year. The cost to the District is estimated to be less than $1,500 over the next 12 months due to the fact that approximately 90% of the cost of operating and maintaining the vans is paid by the vanpool participants. If proven to Rideshare Program Enhancements Page 2 November 12, 2003

operate at high capacity, new vans for these routes would be proposed for the FY04/05 budget.

The District’s current rideshare participation rate is approximately 16% with more than half being vanpool participants. A recent survey of other agencies indicated that those with direct monetary incentives, transit subsidies and/or gift certificate programs have an average participation rate of 35%. Adding incentives for other forms of ridesharing is likely to increase participation in carpooling, the use of public transportation and bicycling to further assist the District in achieving its AVR goal as well as creating more available parking.

• Point-award system: Employees would earn one (1) point for each day they rideshare. Each point would earn $1.00 toward a gift certificate or other award.

Annual cost of incentive at current participation level (37) $ 8,000 Annual cost of incentive at projected participation level (60)* $12,000 Annual cost per participating employee $ 200 *Projection based on survey

• Monthly Metrolink subsidy: A monthly subsidy of $50 would encourage employees to take advantage of the public transit available for long distance commuters. Metrolink tickets cost from $160 to over $200 per month depending on point of origin.

Annual cost of incentive at anticipated participation level (3) $ 1,800 Annual cost per participating employee $ 600

• Rideshare Raffles: Monthly rideshare raffles are low-cost incentives that can be added to generate awareness of the District’s rideshare program and further encourage participation

Annual cost of incentive at $100 per month $ 1,200

Total annual cost of Incentives $15,000 Total monthly cost $ 1,250

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that two additional vanpool routes be initiated immediately by utilizing existing vans when their replacement vehicles have been delivered. It is further recommended that if these new routes continue to attract high participation, that the FY04/05 budget process propose funding for two new vans.

Rideshare Program Enhancements Page 3 November 12, 2003

In addition, it is recommended that the following incentives be added to the District’s Rideshare Program:

• Point-award system • Monthly Metrolink subsidy • Monthly rideshare raffles

Implementation of these enhancements will result in a projected increase in rideshare participation and AVR.

Current Program Enhanced Program Rideshare program participation rate 15% 21% Vehicles eliminated through vanpools 43 63 Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) 1.4% 1.6%

Orange County Sanitation District Vanpool Operating Costs 2002

Vanpool Vehicle V-416 V-417 V-419 V-525 V-526

Average Miles/Year 12,000 21,000 22,000 28,000 8,000

Total Cost of Fuel $1,806 $2,520 $2,640 $3,360 $1,082

Average Vehicle O&M Cost $3,541 $3,541 $3,541 $3,541 $3,541

Annual Cost $5,347 $6,061 $6,181 $6,901 $4,623

Total Operating Costs $29,113 Passenger Fees (current rates) ($25,488) Total District Cost $3,625

Cost Per Vanpool $725

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 14(k).2.xls Meeting Date To Bd. of Dir. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 11/19/03 Item Number Item Number AGENDA REPORT 15(b) Orange County Sanitation District

FROM: David Ludwin, Director of Engineering Originator: Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer III

SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-36, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM UNIT II PIPELINE PROJECT

GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION

Authorize award of a construction contract by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to Colich Construction LP, for construction of Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) Unit II Pipeline Project, Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, for an amount not to exceed $16,084,005, with OCWD and Orange County Sanitation District paying equal shares of $8,042,003.

SUMMARY

• In August, the Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) approved the plans and specifications for the GWRS Unit II Pipeline Project with an engineer’s estimate of $20,800,000. • This project involves installation of approximately 17,000 linear feet of 66-inch diameter cement mortar lined and coated steel pipe that extends from just north of 17th Street, through River View Golf Course, to Katella Avenue in the west bank along the Santa Ana River. • On October 21, 2003, ten bids were received, with the lowest bid in the amount of $16,084,005. A tabulation of the ten bids is included in the attached Agenda Item Submittal from the November 10, 2003 JCC meeting. • On November 10, 2003, the JCC recommended awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Colich Construction LP, for the bid amount of $16,084,005.

PRIOR COMMITTEE/BOARD ACTIONS

Joint Cooperative Committee approved the Plans and Specifications on August 11, 2003.

PROJECT/CONTRACT COST SUMMARY

See the attached Budget Information Table. The value of the contract awarded with this action is $16,084,005, with OCWD and OCSD paying equal shares of $8,042,003. This bid is less than the engineer’s estimate.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 15(b).GWRS.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 1

BUDGET IMPACT

This item has been budgeted. (Line Item: Section 8, Page 139) This item has been budgeted, but there are insufficient funds. This item has not been budgeted. Not applicable (information item)

The breakdown of total construction costs between the separate contracts is shown in the following table. Each agency is responsible for a 50% share of these costs. OCSD’s share is itemized on page 3 of the Agenda Report.

Summary of Current Construction Budgetary Costs by Contract

ID Contract Eng. Est. Awarded Completed No. 1 Theo Lacy Pipeline Reach, GWR Portion 1,430,000 $1,430,000 2 GWR Pipeline – Reach 1 29,400,000 3 GWR Pipeline – Reach 2 20,800,000 16,084,005 4 GWR Pipeline – Reach 3 16,989,000 16,989,000 5 Temp MF/Site work/Site Power 17,140,000 17,139,646 6 Southeast Barrier Pipeline 3,381,000 3,381,000 7 West End Barrier Pipeline 265,000 265,000 8 Advanced Water Treatment Facility 253,600,000 9 SCE Work for Permanent Substation 2,396,000 2,396,000 10 Barrier Well Drilling/Monitoring 12,400,000 Wells/Wellhead Facilities/Pipelines 11 GWR Team Temp Offices/Trailers 807,000 807,000 12 Southern California Water Co. Well 1,635,000 13 Vendor Design Submittals for MF, UV, 1,162,000 1,162,000 and PCS 14 Emerson Process Control System 2,373,000 15 Integrated Information System 4,860,000 16 Owner Controlled Insurance Program 7,400,000 7,384,937 Current Construction Total $376,038,000 $64,801,588 $2,237,000

The cost breakdown for the final design and construction phases of the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) budget as approved in October 2002 and to be cost shared is:

Construction: $379,400,000 Engineering, Legal Administration: $ 54,700,000 Project Contingency: $ 19,800,000 Total: $453,900,000

The current total project cost estimate for the final design and construction phase is within the total estimate presented in October 2002 when the Joint Exercise of Power Agreement for the Development, Operation and Maintenance of the GWRS and the Green Acres Project and budget was approved.

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 15(b).GWRS.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 2

The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Capital Budget is:

GWRS Final Design and Construction Cost Shared Costs: $ 226,950,000 OCSD Preliminary Design and Non-cost Shared Costs: $ 9,256,000 Total Capital Costs to OCSD $ 236,206,000 Grants $ (45,000,000) Net Costs after Grants $ 191,206,000

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Please refer to the attached November 10, 2003, Joint Cooperative Committee (JCC) Agenda Item Submittal

ALTERNATIVES

There are no recommended alternatives to awarding to the lowest responsible bidder.

CEQA FINDINGS

The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System was certified by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Board of Directors on March 24, 1999. Addendum No. 1 was approved on March 28, 2001. Addendum No. 2 was approved by OCSD on January 23, 2002, and by OCWD on January 16, 2002.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Budget Information Table 2. Agenda Item Submittal to the JCC re: Award of Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project

WS:lc: G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 15(b).GWRS.doc

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 15(b).GWRS.doc Revised: 06/04/03 Page 3 BUDGET INFORMATION TABLE GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT (GWR) SYSTEM JOB NO. j-36

PROPOSED ORIGINAL CURRENT PROPOSED FUNDS THIS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT/PHASE AUTHORIZED PROJECT REVISED AUTHORIZED TO AUTHORIZATION TOTAL EXPENDITURE EXPENDED TO INCREASE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET DATE REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO DATE DATE(%) /DECREASE

Phase 1 - Project Development $ 700,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 100%

Phase 2 - Preliminary Design $ 3,313,000 $ 3,313,000 $ 3,300,000 $ - $ 3,300,000 $ 3,317,000 101%

Phase 3 - Design $ 9,849,000 $ 20,957,000 $ 20,957,000 $ 18,898,222 $ 18,898,222 $ 12,000,000 63%

Phase 4 - Construction $ 98,481,000 $ 201,932,000 $ 201,932,000 $ 34,059,244 $ 8,042,003 $ 42,101,247 $ 5,123,000 12%

Phase 5 - Commissioning $ - $ - $ - 0%

Phase 6 - Close-Out $ - $ - $ - 0%

Phase 7 - Contingency $ 12,895,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 $ - 0%

PROJECT TOTAL $ 121,925,000 $ 236,206,000 $ - $ 236,206,000 $ 56,261,466 $ 8,042,003 $ 64,303,469 $ 20,444,000 32%

Reimbursable Costs $ 45,000,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 4,000,000

PROJECT NET $ 121,925,000 $ 191,206,000 $ - $ 191,206,000 $ 56,261,466 $ 8,042,003 $ 64,303,469 $ 16,444,000 26%

PSA/Contract

Design PSA $ 15,921,453 $ - $ 15,921,453 $ 15,921,453 $ - $ 15,921,453

Construction Contract $ 187,746,097 $ - $ 187,746,097 $ 25,411,851 $ 8,042,003 $ 33,453,853

G:\wp.dta\agenda\Board Agenda Reports\2003 Board Agenda Reports\1103\Item 15(b).1.xls

AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTAL

Meeting Date: November 10, 2003 Budgeted: Yes Funding Source: OCWD/OCSD/Grants To: Joint Groundwater Replenishment Program/Line Item No.: 501-5049-722.60-01 System Cooperative Committee Cost Estimate: $20,800,000

From: Virginia Grebbien General Counsel Approval: N/A Blake Anderson Project Report Approved: Yes CEQA Compliance: Yes

Staff Contact: Shivaji Deshmukh

Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. GWRS-2003-4, GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT SYSTEM UNIT II PIPELINE PROJECT

SUMMARY

Ten bids for Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project, were received and opened on October 21, 2003. Following evaluation of the bids, staff recommends awarding the contract to the lowest responsive bidder, Colich Construction, LP, for the bid amount of $16,084,005.

RECOMMENDATION

Agendize for the November 19 OCWD and November 26 OCSD Board meetings:

1) Receive and file Affidavit of Publication of Notice Inviting Bids;

2) Ratify issuance of Addenda Nos. 1 -3; and

3) Accept bid and award Contract No. GWRS-2003-4, Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Colich Construction, LP, for $16,084,005.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS

In August, this Committee approved plans and specifications and authorized solicitation of bids for the Groundwater Replenishment System Unit II Pipeline Project. This project involves installation of approximately 17,000 linear feet of 66-inch diameter cement mortar lined and coated steel pipe that extends just north of 17th Street in Santa Ana, through River View Golf Course to Katella Avenue. This unit includes the relocation of the Regional Trail to the east side of the river during construction, and then restoring it to the west side at the end of the project. The pipeline alignment will be in the west

- 1 -

bank of the Santa Ana River and includes tunnels at each street and freeway under crossing.

The Notice Inviting Bids was published on August 12, 2003, and three addenda were issued on September 17, October 2, and October 10, 2003, which provided minor clarifications to the plans and specifications.

Bids were opened on October 21, 2003, and a total of ten bids were received. The companies that submitted bids and their respective bid amounts were as follows:

Colich Construction, LP $ 16,084,005 Ken Thompson, Inc. $ 16,090,548* Steve Bubalo Construction Co. $ 16,450,000 Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc. $ 17,160,000 L.H. Woods & Sons Inc. $ 17,250,891 ARB, Inc. $ 18,708,675* Southern California Underground $ 18,358,725* Valverde Construction Inc. $ 21,812,721 Las Vegas Paving Corp. $ 22,180,249 Kiewit Pacific Company $ 23,206,739*

* - Bids adjusted for arithmetical errors.

Staff has evaluated the bid of Colich Construction, LP and found it to be complete and responsive. Colich Construction, LP has the appropriate State contractor’s license which is current and in good standing. References have also been checked and found acceptable.

The low bid that was received was $ 4,715,995 under the Engineer’s estimate and this amount has been transferred to the program contingency, which maintains the overall program budget of $453.9 million adopted by this Committee and both Boards of Directors.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS

August 11, 2003 Approval of plans and specifications and solicitation of bids.

- 2 -