Schizocosa Ocreata): a Comparison of Survivorship, Critical Body Water Content, and Water Loss Rates Between Sexes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate -
Comparison of Reproductive Traits Between Two Salt-Marsh Wolf Spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) Under Different Habitat Suitability Conditions
Animal Biology 61 (2011) 127–138 brill.nl/ab Comparison of reproductive traits between two salt-marsh wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) under different habitat suitability conditions Charlène Puzin1, Anthony Acou2, Dries Bonte3 and Julien Pétillon4,∗ 1 Université de Rennes 1, U.R.U. 420 – Biodiversité et Gestion des territoires, U.F.R. SVE, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, CS 74205, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France 2 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, U.M.R. 7208 BOREA – Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Station Marine de Dinard, BP 70134, 38 rue du Port Blanc, 35800 Dinard, France 3 Ghent University, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Department of Biology, K. L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4 University of Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecology Group, Department of Biology, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium Abstract Salt-marsh invasions by the grass Elymus athericus (Poaceae) recently transformed usual areas dom- inated by Atriplex portulacoides (Chenopodiaceae) into homogeneous meadows. Two wolf spider species, Pardosa purbeckensis and Arctosa fulvolineata, show contrasting densities and habitat prefer- ences in salt marshes (respectively dominant and co-dominant ground-living spiders) and oppositely respond to the grass invasion. This allowed us to test whether invasive species that alter habitat struc- ture affect reproduction in addition to previously recorded changes in density. Reproductive traits (female mass, cocoon mass, number and volume of eggs, hatched cocoon as a proxy of reproduc- tion date) were studied in both invaded and natural salt marshes during 2007 and 2008 in the Mont St-Michel Bay (France). In both species, reproductive outputs (cocoon mass) were higher in optimal habitats and volume of eggs was found to be independent from female mass, whereas the latter sig- nificantly influenced the number of eggs. -
In Schizocosa Ocreata (Araneae: Lycosidae): a Reassessment by Alan B
THE "EDGE EFFECT" IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA (ARANEAE: LYCOSIDAE): A REASSESSMENT BY ALAN B. CADY l, WILLIAM J. TIETJEN 2, AND GEORGE W. UETZ INTRODUCTION The relationship between local spider distribution patterns and environmental factors has been studied in a variety of species (Nergaard 1951; Dondale et al. 1969; Hallander 1970; Edgar 1971; Riechert 1974, 1976; Uetz 1976; Dondale 1977). Aspey (1976)stated that Schizocosa ocreata (Walckenaer)(formerly crassipes; Dondale and Redner 1978) was found in aggregations along a woodland-field ecotone, and suggested that unique microclimatic conditions and social interactions among conspecifics occurring within this area resulted in an "edge effect" for this spider's distribution. He termed S. ocreata an "edge" species, implying it was found almost exclu- sively along ecotones. We were skeptical of Aspey's (1976) conclu- sions, since previous literature and prior experience with this species led each of us to the separate conclusion that S. ocreata is a forest- dwelling spider (Kaston 1948; Dondale and Redner 1978; Uetz 1976; Cady (in prep.)). In addition, Aspey's (1976) survey for S. ocreata appeared incomplete, as he did not report sampling within the adjacent woodland or field. Considering Aspey's (1976) elaborate behavioral arguments based on assumptions about the distribution of this species, we felt further study was necessary. METHODS The study site was approximately 3.5 km west from Aspey's (1976) site. Three areas were sampled: A mixed hardwood deciduous woodland (Quercus sp., Liriodendron sp., Fraxinus sp., Fagus sp.), the adjoining ecotone, and an open goldenrod-thistle field (Solidago sp., Cirsium sp.). Spiders were sampled by twelve pitfall traps of the type described by Uetz and Unzicker (1976). -
A HAWAIIAN WOLF SPIDER, LYCOSA HAWAHENSIS METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA TREE Xerophytic Plants
1985 . The Journal of Arachnology 13 :393 A HAWAIIAN WOLF SPIDER, LYCOSA HAWAHENSIS SIMON FORAGING IN THE TOP OF A METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA TREE Of the lycosid spiders, most Lycosa species are ground dwellers (e .g., Dondale et al. 1971, Turnbull 1973, Bixler 1970) . However, Lycosa rabida and L. punctatum have been found in vegetation (Kaston 1948, Barnes 1953, Whitcomb et al. 1963) and L. rabida has been noted on the lower branches of tree s (Kuenzler 1958) . Several endemic Hawaiian species of Lycosa (see Simon 1900, Suman 1964 , Gertsch 1973) are abundant in subalpine, alpine and aeolian zones of Hawai'i's highest mountains, and in aeolian habitats on fresh lava flows on the geologicall y active island of Hawaii (Howarth 1979, Howarth and Montgomery 1980) . Very little is known of their ecology and behavior . Their presence in barren lav a regions is maintained by windborne prey transported onto the flows fro m adjacent vegetated areas. I have observed Lycosa on lava flows at and above treeline on the island of Maui . Typically, the spiders forage at ground level, but may perch upon higher vantage points such as lava boulders and outcrops . I had never previously observed the spiders in low native shrubs nor collected them b y sweeping vegetation. On 1 September 1982, 14:54 h, at 1700 m elev. in the Koolau Gap o f Haleakala on the island of Maui, a mature female Lycosa hawaiiensis Simon (c. 2.75 cm body length) was observed stationed upon the apical tips of a Metrosideros polymorpha tree (c. 2.4 m in ht.). -
Koexistence a Rozdělení Niky U Pavouků Rodu Philodromus
Masarykova univerzita Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Koexistence a rozdělení niky u pavouků rodu Philodromus Diplomová práce Autor: Radek Michalko Brno 2012 Vedoucí DP: doc. Mgr. Stano Pekár Ph.D. 1 Souhlasím s uloţením této diplomové práce v knihovně Ústavu botaniky a zoologie PřF MU v Brně, případně v jiné knihovně MU, s jejím veřejným půjčováním a vyuţitím pro vědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, ţe převzaté informace budou řádně citovány a nebudou vyuţívány komerčně. V Brně 8.1.2012 ………………………………… Podpis 2 PODĚKOVÁNÍ Zejména bych chtěl poděkovat vedoucímu mé diplomové práce panu docentu Stanu Pekárovi, ţe mi umoţnil pracovat na tomto tématu, za trpělivé vedení a uţitečné rady. Dále bych chtěl velice poděkovat mým rodičům, bez jejichţ osobní a finanční podpory by tato práce nevznikla. Rovněţ bych chtěl poděkovat Lence Sentenské, Evě Líznarové, Pavlovi Šebkovi a Stanovi Korenkovi za podporu a cenné rady všeho druhu. 3 ABSTRAKT Koexistence a rozdělení niky pavouků rodu Philodromus V této diplomové práci byl zkoumán mechanismus umoţňující koexistenci mezi Philodromus albidus, P. aureolus a P. cespitum. Studie probíhala na území významného krajinného prvku U Kříţe v Brně Starém Lískovci. Studované území se skládá ze třech typů biotopů: listnatý les, křoviny a monokultura švestek. Pavouci byli získáváni pomocí sklepávání. U zkoumaných druhů byly porovnávány různé dimenze niky. Prostorová nika byla zkoumána na základě mikro- aţ makrobiotopových preferencí. Trofická nika byla zkoumána na základě velikosti a typu přirozené kořisti a pomocí laboratorních experimentů potravních preferencí. Časová nika byla zkoumána na základě fenologie jednotlivých druhů. Studované druhy se lišily v prostorové a trofické nice. -
Role of the Different Eyes in the Visual Odometry in the Wolf Spider Lycosa Tarantula (Araneae, Lycosidae) Joaquin Ortega-Escobar* and Miguel A
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 259-265 doi:10.1242/jeb.145763 RESEARCH ARTICLE Role of the different eyes in the visual odometry in the wolf spider Lycosa tarantula (Araneae, Lycosidae) Joaquin Ortega-Escobar* and Miguel A. Ruiz ABSTRACT et al., 2000). When the grating was placed in the ventral visual field, The wolf spider Lycosa tarantula returns home by means of path Ronacher and Wehner (1995) found a very small effect of optic flow integration. Previous studies demonstrated: (i) that the angular on the distance walked when the visual patterns they used (e.g. component of the outbound run is measured using a polarized-light gratings of black-and-white stripes) were moved in the direction of compass associated with the anterior median eyes; (ii) changes in insect walking or in the opposite direction. However, when the direction of the substratum are detected by the anterior lateral eyes pattern was stationary and the ventral halves of the eyes were (ALEs); and (iii) in relation to the linear component of the outbound covered, the mean traveled distance was not statistically different run, an increase of optic flow, in either the lateral or ventral fields of from the distance walked by ants without eye covers (Ronacher and view, caused spiders to search for the burrow at a point nearer to the Wehner, 1995). Wittlinger and Wolf (2013) investigated the goal. However, the role of the secondary eyes [ALEs, posterior lateral possible interactions of the two mechanisms by which deserts eyes (PLEs) and posterior median eyes (PMEs)] in the perception of ants estimate distance: stride integration and ventral optic flow. -
Brushlegged Wolf Spider Schizocosa Ocreata ILLINOIS RANGE
brushlegged wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Arthropoda Like all wolf spiders, the brushlegged wolf spider has Class: Chelicerata four, large eyes in a trapezoid shape on the top of the Order: Araneae carapace. The two median eyes in this group of four are the largest and face forward. The two smaller eyes in Family: Lycosidae this group of four are set behind the two central eyes, ILLINOIS STATUS facing to the side or backwards. In front of these four eyes is a row of four, smaller eyes. Females are about common, native 0.29 to 0.41 inch in total body length. Males are smaller 0.24 to 0.39 inch in total body length. The general body color is brown with a lighter-colored band longitudinally in the center of the cephalothorax and abdomen. The dark areas on the sides of the cephalothorax and abdomen may appear to be black. The male’s front legs are black with clusters of setae. BEHAVIORS This species is found in leaf litter in upland deciduous forests, forest edges and open fields near woodlands. It hunts during the day and at night. Adults are active from April through October. Subadults are the overwintering stage. They mature in spring. Wolf spiders have good vision. They perform courtship rituals like waving the legs or palps with making sounds created by vibrating body parts against each other or a surface or object they are near. Wolf spiders generally do not build a web but use a dragline of silk for communication. The female ILLINOIS RANGE builds an egg sac and attaches it to her spinnerets. -
The Effects of Native and Non-Native Grasses on Spiders, Their Prey, and Their Interactions
Spiders in California’s grassland mosaic: The effects of native and non-native grasses on spiders, their prey, and their interactions by Kirsten Elise Hill A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Joe R. McBride, Chair Professor Rosemary G. Gillespie Professor Mary E. Power Spring 2014 © 2014 Abstract Spiders in California’s grassland mosaic: The effects of native and non-native grasses on spiders, their prey, and their interactions by Kirsten Elise Hill Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science and Policy Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Joe R. McBride, Chair Found in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, small in size and able to occupy a variety of hunting niches, spiders’ consumptive effects on other arthropods can have important impacts for ecosystems. This dissertation describes research into spider populations and their interactions with potential arthropod prey in California’s native and non-native grasslands. In meadows found in northern California, native and non-native grassland patches support different functional groups of arthropod predators, sap-feeders, pollinators, and scavengers and arthropod diversity is linked to native plant diversity. Wandering spiders’ ability to forage within the meadow’s interior is linked to the distance from the shaded woodland boundary. Native grasses offer a cooler conduit into the meadow interior than non-native annual grasses during midsummer heat. Juvenile spiders in particular, are more abundant in the more structurally complex native dominated areas of the grassland. -
Predation on Reproducing Wolf Spiders: Access to Information Has Differential Effects on Male and Female Survival
Animal Behaviour 128 (2017) 165e173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Predation on reproducing wolf spiders: access to information has differential effects on male and female survival * Ann L. Rypstra a, , Chad D. Hoefler b, 1, Matthew H. Persons c, 2 a Department of Biology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH, U.S.A. b Department of Biology, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, U.S.A. c Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, U.S.A. article info Predation has widespread influences on animal behaviour, and reproductive activities can be particularly Article history: dangerous. Males and females differ in their reactions to sensory stimuli from predators and potential Received 13 September 2016 mates, which affects the risk experienced by each sex. Thus, the information available can cause dif- Initial acceptance 8 November 2016 ferential survival and have profound implications for mating opportunities and population structure. The Final acceptance 24 March 2017 wolf spider, Pardosa milvina, detects and responds in a risk-sensitive manner to chemotactile information from a larger predator, the wolf spider Tigrosa helluo. Male P. milvina use similar chemotactile cues to find MS. number: A16-00806R2 females whereas female P. milvina focus on the visual, and perhaps vibratory, aspects of the male display. Our aim was to document the risk posed by T. helluo predators on P. milvina during reproduction and to Keywords: determine whether augmenting chemotactile information would affect that outcome. In the laboratory, chemical cue we explored the effects of adding predator and/or female cues on the predatory success of T. -
Elevational Variation of Body Size and Reproductive Traits in High-Latitude
Elevational variation of body size and reproductive traits in high-latitude wolf spiders (Araneae Lycosidae) Camille Ameline, Tøke Thomas Høye, Joseph James Bowden, Rikke Reisner Hansen, Oskar Liset Pryds Hansen, Charlène Puzin, Philippe Vernon, Julien Pétillon To cite this version: Camille Ameline, Tøke Thomas Høye, Joseph James Bowden, Rikke Reisner Hansen, Oskar Liset Pryds Hansen, et al.. Elevational variation of body size and reproductive traits in high-latitude wolf spiders (Araneae Lycosidae). Polar Biology, Springer Verlag, 2018, 41 (12), pp.2561-2574. 10.1007/s00300- 018-2391-5. hal-01937629 HAL Id: hal-01937629 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01937629 Submitted on 14 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Elevational variation of body size and reproductive traits in high latitude wolf spiders 2 (Araneae: Lycosidae) 3 4 Camille Ameline (corresponding author), ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6892-2819 5 Université de Rennes 1, EA 7316, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, CS 74205, 35042 Rennes 6 Cedex, France 7 Current address: University of Basel, Zoological Institute, Evolutionary Biology, Vesalgasse 8 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland 9 [email protected], [email protected], phone: +41(0)61 207 03 72 10 11 Toke Thomas Høye, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5387-3284 12 Department of Bioscience and Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Grenåvej 14, DK- 13 8410 Rønde, Denmark 14 Joseph James Bowden, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0940-4901 15 Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, bldg. -
2016 Persons Mercury Content Spiders
Variation in total mercury content among riparian and non-riparian spider species Hailey Shannon, Derek Wilson, Tara Barbarich, Brian Mangan*, and Matthew Persons Dept. of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870 *Dept. of Biology, King’s College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 ABSTRACT Spiders collected and Mercury is a persistent environmental contaminant that primarily originates from coal-fired Spiders prepared power plants but may arise from other sources including uncontrolled mine fires. Variation in Collected spiders were rinsed total mercury uptake and mobilization through the apex arthropod community is poorly identified (N = 672) with water for at least 10 understood. We measured total mercury among ground and web-building spiders at sites along the Susquehanna River near a coal-fired power plant and compared total mercury levels seconds and placed in small to spiders from uncontrolled coal fire burn sites (Centralia, PA and Laurel Run, PA) and Spiders were labeled containers. Spiders reference sites away from the river or point sources of mercury pollution (agricultural fields collected from 6 sites were kept frozen until and headwater streams). We measured total mercury across species, age classes, and sexes from June to analyzed. for several species of ground spider and a web-building spider at these sites. Spiders from November of 2015 mine fire sites had total mercury levels over 2.5 times higher than those in riparian zones and 2016. Tetragnatha elongata Spiders analyzed for Hg adjacent to the power plant and about six times higher than those from agricultural fields or Spiders were sent to King’s riparian zones away from power plants. -
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use.