European Parliament 2019-2024

Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

2020/2273(INI)

22.2.2021

AMENDMENTS 1 - 1215

Draft report César Luena (PE662.048v01-00)

EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives (2020/2273(INI))

AM\1225089EN.docx PE680.715v02-00

EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport

PE680.715v02-00 2/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 8 October 2020 on the European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0257.

Or. it

Amendment 2 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2020 on the new EU Forest Strategy1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0257

Or. en

Amendment 3 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 3/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution on the new EU Forest Strategy of 8 October 20201a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0257

Or. en

Amendment 4 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 8 October 2020 on the European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0257.

Or. fi

Amendment 5 Alexander Bernhuber, Petri Sarvamaa, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Citation 17 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its report on the European Forest Strategy - The Way Forward1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0257

PE680.715v02-00 4/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 6 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Citation 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to the Commission deleted communication of 11 December 2019 entitled ‘The European Green Deal’ (COM(2019)0640),

Or. fr

Amendment 7 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to the Commission — having regard to the Commission communication of 11 December 2019 on communication of 11 December 2019 on the European Green Deal the European Green Deal (COM(2019)0640), (COM(2019)0640), and its resolution of 15 January 2020 on the same subject1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0005,

Or. en

Amendment 8 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 5/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive)1a , ______1a OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19–40,

Or. en

Amendment 9 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the report of FOREST EUROPE of 17 December 2020 on the State of Europe's Forests;

Or. en

Amendment 10 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the report of FOREST EUROPE of 17 December 2020on the State of Europe's Forests,

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 6/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 11 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Citation 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the IPCC special report Global Warming of 1.5°C and the IPCC special report The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate;

Or. en

Amendment 12 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Citation 2 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea;

Or. en

Amendment 13 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission report of 15 October 2020 on The state of nature in the European Union - the status and trends in 2013 -2018 of species and

AM\1225089EN.docx 7/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN habitat types protected by the Birds and Habitats Directives of 15 October 2020 (COM(2020) 635);

Or. en

Amendment 14 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Environment Agency (EEA) report of 19 October 2020 entitled "State of Nature in the EU - Results from reporting under the nature directives 2013-2018",

Or. en

Amendment 15 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

– having regard to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) report of 27 October 2020 entitled ‘The Mediterranean: Mare plasticum’,

Or. fr

Amendment 16 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 8/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the EEA report of October 2020 on the State of nature in the EU Results from reporting under the nature directives 2013-2018;

Or. en

Amendment 17 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS),

Or. en

Amendment 18 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2017 on an Action Plan for nature, people and the economy1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0441

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 9/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 19 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2017 on an Action Plan for nature, people, and the economy1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0441 (2017/2819(RSP))

Or. en

Amendment 20 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2017 on an Action Plan for nature, people and the economy1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0441

Or. en

Amendment 21 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 10/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Special Reports of the European Court of Auditors on "Sustainable use of plant protection products: limited progress in measuring and reducing risks" (05/2020), "Biodiversity on farmland: CAP contribution has not halted the decline" (13/2020), "Protection of wild pollinators in the EU — Commission initiatives have not borne fruit" (15/2020), and "Marine environment: EU protection is wide but not deep" (26/2020),

Or. en

Amendment 22 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors special report 26/2020 of 26 November 2020 entitled 'Marine environment: EU protection is wide but not deep',

Or. en

Amendment 23 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors (ECA) special report of

AM\1225089EN.docx 11/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 26 November 2020 entitled “Marine environment: EU protection is wide but not deep”,

Or. en

Amendment 24 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors special report entitled Marine environment: EU protection is wide but not Deep, published on 26 November 2020,

Or. en

Amendment 25 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors special report 15/2020 of 9 July 2020 entitled 'Protection of wild pollinators in the EU — Commission initiatives have not borne fruit',

Or. en

Amendment 26

PE680.715v02-00 12/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 7 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors special report 13/2020 of 5 June 2020 entitled 'Biodiversity on farmland: CAP contribution has not halted the decline',

Or. en

Amendment 27 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report 13/2020: Biodiversity on farmland: CAP contribution has not halted the decline,

Or. en

Amendment 28 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Directorate- General for Internal Policies report of December 2020 entitled "The link between biodiversity loss and the increasing spread of zoonotic diseases",

AM\1225089EN.docx 13/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 29 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission Communication of 11 October 2018 on a sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment (COM/2018/673);

Or. en

Amendment 30 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

– having regard to the European Environment Agency (EEA) report of 23 November 2020 entitled ‘Air quality in Europe - 2020 report’,

Or. fr

Amendment 31 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 14/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN - having regard to the European Environment Agency report of 19 October 2020 entitled 'The State of Nature in the EU',

Or. en

Amendment 32 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Environment Agency (EEA ) report of 19 October 2020 entitled “The State of Nature in the EU”,

Or. en

Amendment 33 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard the European Environment Agency briefing of 13 January 2021 entitled 'Growth without economic growth',

Or. en

Amendment 34 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 15/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Citation 8 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission Communication of 26 February 2016 on an EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking (COM/2016/087),

Or. en

Amendment 35 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission Communication of 26 February 2016 on an EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking(COM/2016/087);

Or. en

Amendment 36 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission Communication of 26 February 2016 on an EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking(COM/2016/087);

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 16/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 37 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Citation 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to the IPBES deleted Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of 29 October 2020,

Or. en

Amendment 38 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the IPCC reports, particularly the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC), the Special Report on climate change and land (SRCCL), and the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (SR15),

Or. en

Amendment 39 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the outcome of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on Gene Drives and living

AM\1225089EN.docx 17/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN modified fish,

Or. en

Amendment 40 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission report of 2 October 2015 on the mid-term review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (COM/2015/0478),

Or. en

Amendment 41 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2016 on Japan’s decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season1a and to its resolution of 12 September 2017 on whale hunting in Norway1b, ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0313 1b Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0317

Or. en

Amendment 42 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae

PE680.715v02-00 18/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Environment Agency assessment report of 6 October 2020entitled Management effectiveness in the EU's Natura 2000 network of protected areas,

Or. en

Amendment 43 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on an EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0285

Or. en

Amendment 44 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Citation 11 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the JRC Science for policy report of 13 October 2020

AM\1225089EN.docx 19/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN entitled Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment, published,

Or. en

Amendment 45 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Citation 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to its resolution of deleted 28 November 2019 on the climate and environment emergency2 , ______2 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0078.

Or. en

Amendment 46 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Citation 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to its resolution of deleted 28 November 2019 on the climate and environment emergency2 , ______2 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0078.

Or. en

Amendment 47 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia

PE680.715v02-00 20/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Pereira, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Communication on Stepping up EU Action to Protect and Restore the World’s Forests1a ______1a COM(2019) 352 final

Or. en

Amendment 48 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 10 July 2020 on a Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability,1a ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0201.

Or. en

Amendment 49 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia Pereira, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Citation 12 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 16 September 2020 on the EU’s role in

AM\1225089EN.docx 21/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN protecting and restoring the world forests1a , ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0212

Or. en

Amendment 50 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Decision No 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living well, within the limits of our planet’ and the proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a new General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030,

Or. cs

Amendment 51 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

– having regard to the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention),

Or. fr

PE680.715v02-00 22/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 52 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 9 September 2020 on the European Year of Greener Cities 20221a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0241

Or. en

Amendment 53 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Citation 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Title XX of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Or. cs

Amendment 54 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the statement of the President of the European Parliament on 12 September 2020 at the meeting of Speakers of the G7 countries on climate

AM\1225089EN.docx 23/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN change,

Or. en

Amendment 55 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution (Barcelona Convention), the Bucharest Convention on the protection of the black sea, the Helsinki Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea, and the OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic;

Or. en

Amendment 56 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2020 edition of the report of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) on the State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA 2020)

Or. en

Amendment 57

PE680.715v02-00 24/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Citation 17 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the decision of the European Ombudsman in case 640/2019/FP on the transparency of the Council of the European Union’s decision-making process leading to the adoption of annual regulations setting fishing quotas (total allowable catches),

Or. en

Amendment 58 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a deleted climate and environmental emergency and approved an ambitious Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on our planet;

Or. en

Amendment 59 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas Parliament has declared a

AM\1225089EN.docx 25/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN climate and environmental emergency and climate and environmental emergency and approved an ambitious Climate Law committed to urgently take the concrete report; whereas biodiversity loss and action needed in order to fight and climate change represent equal threats to contain this threat before it is too late; life on our planet; whereas Parliament approved a more ambitious Climate Law report than the Commission's proposal; whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on our planet and are intrinsically linked crises;

Or. en

Amendment 60 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas Parliament has approved climate and environmental emergency an ambitious Climate Law report; and approved an ambitious Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on our planet;

Or. en

Amendment 61 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas the European Parliament climate and environmental emergency and has declared a climate and environmental approved an ambitious Climate Law report; emergency and approved an ambitious whereas biodiversity loss and climate Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity

PE680.715v02-00 26/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN change represent equal threats to life on loss and climate change, reinforce each our planet; other, representing equal threats to life on our planet, and as such, should be urgently tackled together;

Or. en

Amendment 62 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas Parliament has declared a climate and environmental emergency and climate and environmental emergency and approved an ambitious Climate Law report; approved an ambitious Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity loss and climate whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on change represent equal threats to life on our planet; our planet; stresses that biodiversity loss is the most critical and acute crisis we are facing;

Or. en

Amendment 63 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas Parliament has declared a climate and environmental emergency and climate and environmental emergency and approved an ambitious Climate Law report; approved an ambitious Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity loss and climate whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on change represent equal and our planet; strongly interwoven threats to life on our planet;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 27/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 64 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas Parliament has declared a A. whereas Parliament has declared a climate and environmental emergency and climate and environmental emergency and approved an ambitious Climate Law report; approved an ambitious Climate Law report; whereas biodiversity loss and climate whereas biodiversity loss and climate change represent equal threats to life on change are linked to and represent equal our planet; threats to life on our planet;

Or. fr

Amendment 65 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas the European Court of Auditors has highlighted serious shortcomings in Union policies related to the protection or restoration of biodiversity, including but not limited to inadequate measures to protect or restore biodiversity, lack of implementation and funding, and inappropriate indicators to measure progress; whereas future Union policies should remedy and address said shortcomings;

Or. en

Amendment 66 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 28/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas plant- and animal species have an intrinsic value and should be conserved simply because they exist, as they are the product of a long history of continuing evolution by means of ecological processes and have the right to a continued existence; whereas biodiversity and the conservation of species, genetic resources and ecosystems is important for the maintenance of natural ecological processes;

Or. en

Amendment 67 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas the One Planet Summit in 2021 saw the President of the European Commission outlining a detailed vision for forests protection and having the EU leading the world in the fight against global deforestation; whereas this now needs to be acted upon;

Or. en

Amendment 68 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 29/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas indigenous peoples and local communities play an essential part to preserve the world’s biodiversity and global biodiversity targets cannot be achieved without the recognition of their rights;

Or. en

Amendment 69 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas humans are part of nature and not separate from it;

Or. en

Amendment 70 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ab. whereas the planet has thresholds for the pressures it is able to contain; whereas endless economic growth logic does not respect planetary boundaries and 'sustainable growth' poses the exact same problem; whereas the planned future of economic growth constitutes only more pressures on the planet which it cannot contain;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 30/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 71 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ab. whereas key ecosystems deliver numerous services essential to food and agriculture, including supply of freshwater, protection against hazards and provision of habitats for species such as fish and pollinators, which are declining at a sharp rate;

Or. en

Amendment 72 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ab. whereas extinction of species is forever, threatening the existence of ecosystems and ecosystem services, and posing a threat to human wellbeing and survival and should be prevented by all means available;

Or. en

Amendment 73 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital A c (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 31/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ac. whereas biodiversity is crucial for food security, human well-being and development worldwide; whereas the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted areas of inequalities across agri-food systems, and the necessity to adapt and improve smallholder production sustainably, ensure that the livelihoods of rural populations are more resilient, transform agri-food-systems, and reorient agriculture towards climate sustainability;

Or. en

Amendment 74 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Recital B

Motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas the EU Biodiversity B. whereas the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the upcoming Strategy for 2030 and the upcoming international agreement under the CBD international agreement under the CBD aim to establish the European and global aim to establish the European and global framework on biodiversity up to 2030; framework on biodiversity up to 2030; whereas the EU must seize these occasions to incorporate the lessons drawn from the Sars-CoV-2 outbreak into its policies and objectives, with a view to restoring and maintaining healthy environments and functioning ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 75 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

PE680.715v02-00 32/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Recital B

Motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas the EU Biodiversity B. whereas the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the upcoming Strategy for 2030 and the upcoming international agreement under the CBD international agreement under the CBD aim to establish the European and global aim to establish the European and global framework on biodiversity up to 2030; framework on biodiversity up to 2030; whereas 2021 represents a decisive year for biodiversity and COP15 must be a Paris Agreement moment for biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 76 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ba. whereas agriculture supports 9.6 million jobs in Europe, Natura 2000 has been estimated to support 52 000 direct and indirect jobs in conservation management, and 3.1 million (a quarter) of tourism jobs have links to protected areas;1a ______1a IEEP(2017). Natura 2000 and Jobs Scoping Study. Executive summary.

Or. en

Amendment 77 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

AM\1225089EN.docx 33/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ba. whereas according to the findings of the 2020 ECA and EEAs reports, there is a lack of an effective, well-managed and well-connected network of marine protected areas resulting in limited protection of marine biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 78 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir

Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ba. Whereas close to 80% of the biodiversity of the EU currently lives in its Outermost Regions (ORs) and Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs);

Or. en

Amendment 79 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Bb. whereas according to the JRC 2020 report, invasive alien species (IAS) are now present in all ecosystems and are threatening urban ecosystems and grasslands in particular;

PE680.715v02-00 34/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 80 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Bb. whereas the security of supply of food and the production of renewable energy has to be ensured when setting new targets on the Biodiversity Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 81 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Bc. whereas Europe accounts for more protected areas than any other region of the world and the last decades saw a great increase in both the number of protected areas and the total surface area that has received protected status;1a ______1a European Environment Agency (2012). Protected Areas in Europe – an Overview.

Or. en

Amendment 82 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

AM\1225089EN.docx 35/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Recital C

Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas the evidence available C. whereas the evidence available suggests that it is not too late to halt and suggests that it is not too late to halt and reverse current trends in the decline of reverse current trends in the decline of biodiversity4 ; biodiversity4 ; whereas the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2030 presents the opportunity to incorporate the lessons learned from the Sars-CoV-2 outbreak by switching from a “reactive” model to a “proactive” and precautionary model, initiating a decisive change of the EU policies away from the exploitation of wildlife for domestic and international trade; ______4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. 4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.

Or. en

Amendment 83 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Recital C

Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas the evidence available C. whereas the evidence available suggests that it is not too late to halt and suggests that it is not too late to halt and reverse current trends in the decline of reverse current trends in the decline of biodiversity4 ; biodiversity provided very substantial changes and innovations are implemented on a short timescale, while involving a wide range of actors at all scales and across all sectors of society 4; ______4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. 4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 36/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 84 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C

Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas the evidence available C. whereas the evidence available suggests that it is not too late to halt and suggests that it is not too late to halt and reverse current trends in the decline of reverse current trends in the decline of biodiversity4 ; biodiversity4 ; whereas this requires resolute action integrating biodiversity into all economic sectors; ______4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. 4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.

Or. en

Amendment 85 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Recital C

Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas the evidence available C. whereas the evidence available suggests that it is not too late to halt and suggests that it is still possible to halt and reverse current trends in the decline of reverse current trends in the decline of biodiversity4 ; biodiversity if significant efforts are made4 ; ______4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. 4 Global Biodiversity Outlook 5.

Or. en

Amendment 86 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae

AM\1225089EN.docx 37/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the unfortunate one-year delay in the 2020 Conferences of Parties to the UNFCCC and the CBD caused by the Sars-CoV-2 outbreak provides a unique opportunity to switch from a reactive model to a proactive and precautionary model and ultimately bring about the transformative change needed; whereas new scientific advances should inform and strengthen the links between both international agendas and their national implementation;

Or. en

Amendment 87 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 is one of the key initiatives of the European Green Deal, which aims at making the EU’s economy sustainable and climate-neutral by 2050, protecting, conserving and sustainably using biodiversity, improving the health of citizens and ensuring the sustainability, circularity and inclusiveness of our economy;

Or. en

Amendment 88 Ville Niinistö

PE680.715v02-00 38/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. Whereas the recent SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has dramatically demonstrated that the growing exploitation of animals for intensive agriculture and also domestic and international trade not only places biodiversity under unsustainable pressure, but also results in increased risks to human and animal health and welfare;

Or. en

Amendment 89 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU Pollinators Initiative 1a, which confirms its strong position regarding the importance of pollinators protection, particularly in context of risk and exposure to chemicals and transformative change of agricultural practices; ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104

Or. en

Amendment 90 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

AM\1225089EN.docx 39/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the current network of legally protected areas, including those under strict protection, is not sufficiently large to safeguard biodiversity, whereas 30% of area protected, both at land and at sea, is an absolute minimum needed according to experts;

Or. en

Amendment 91 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas biodiversity is fundamental to both the planet and people as it provides us with clean air and water, food and medicines; whereas only 23% of species and 16% of habitats under the EU Nature Directives are in sustainable status, according to the Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 92 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas forests harbour more than 75% of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity; whereas the Parliament

PE680.715v02-00 40/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN provided recommendations to the Commission on an EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation, forest and ecosystem degradation1a, ______1a Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0285

Or. en

Amendment 93 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the IUCN has declared 160 species to be extinct over the last decade alone and that no level of restoration will be able to bring back extinct species; whereas IPBES estimates that globally 1 million species are at risk of extinction as well;

Or. en

Amendment 94 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the current climate change is unparalleled in human history in terms of its rate and extent and whereas the rate of climate change is one of the major threats to biodiversity;

AM\1225089EN.docx 41/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. cs

Amendment 95 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the use of forests and forestry fall within the competence of the Member States, and the EU must not establish a transnational administrative framework for guidance on matters that are the competence of the Member States;

Or. fi

Amendment 96 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the EU’s Green Deal strategy seeks to ensure decent living conditions for farmers, fishermen and their families;

Or. it

Amendment 97 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the growing internalisation of economies through

PE680.715v02-00 42/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN delocalised processes of production and consumption exert multiple impacts on nature at a global scale and beyond the EU territory;

Or. en

Amendment 98 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the international trade fostered by the free trade agreements that are ratified by the Commission affects biodiversity and ecosystems;

Or. fr

Amendment 99 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas the EU’s Green Deal strategy seeks to ensure decent living conditions for farmers, fishermen and their families;

Or. it

Amendment 100 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 43/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. Whereas the blue economy, supposed to double by 2030, represents a real opportunity for the sustainable development of maritime and coastal activities,

Or. en

Amendment 101 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas 70% of emerging diseases and pandemics have an animal origin1a; ______1a https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020- 12/IPBES%20Workshop%20on%20Biodi versity%20and%20Pandemics%20Report _0.pdf

Or. en

Amendment 102 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the ocean is one, and its good environmental status is vital to ensuring its resilience and its continued provision of ecosystem services such as

CO2 absorption and oxygen production; whereas the IPCC special report entitled

PE680.715v02-00 44/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN "The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate", specifies that climate mechanisms depend on the health of the ocean and marine ecosystems currently affected by global warming, pollution, overexploitation of marine biodiversity, acidification, deoxygenation and coastal erosion; whereas the IPCC recalls that the ocean is part of the solution to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change and underlines the necessity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and pollution on ecosystems, as well as to enhance natural carbon sinks;

Or. en

Amendment 103 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the Farm to Fork Strategy together with other policies such as the upcoming Common Agricultural Policy, the Common Fisheries Policy, and the Cohesion Policy, within their respective legal frameworks, as well as the Circular Economy Action Plan will shape the change to protect nature and conserve habitats and species;

Or. en

Amendment 104 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 45/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the EFSA Bee Guidance Document has not been adopted yet and its review has not been successfully finalised, and the process of Biocides - Pollinators Guidance Document by ECHA is ongoing; whereas even full application of the 2013 EFSA Bee Guidance would leave butterflies, moths and hoverflies unprotected by the pesticide approval regime;

Or. en

Amendment 105 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the EU’s Green Deal strategy seeks to ensure decent living conditions for farmers, livestock farmers, fishermen, hunters and their families, and taking into account the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 relating to primary food producers;

Or. it

Amendment 106 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the Secretariat of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity has strongly encouraged local and subnational action for biodiversity, on the

PE680.715v02-00 46/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN understanding that decentralised planning serves as an effective support to deploy global biodiversity strategies;

Or. en

Amendment 107 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the European Union still faces large implementation gaps to effectively manage the Natura 2000 network; whereas current and future climate change impacts should be also incorporated under management guidelines of Natura 2000;

Or. en

Amendment 108 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas next to nature conservation and restoration, action on drivers of biodiversity loss especially in the land-use sectors and food system transformation are central to an effective post-2020 biodiversity strategy1a ______1a Leclère, D., Obersteiner, M., Barrett, M. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial

AM\1225089EN.docx 47/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2705-y

Or. en

Amendment 109 Ville Niinistö, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas new challenges for the protection of biodiversity might arise from the release of genetically engineered organisms which can persist and propagate within populations of wildlife species;

Or. en

Amendment 110 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas the Aarhus Convention is an effective means of accessing information, promoting public participation in decision-making and accessing justice in environmental matters;

Or. fr

Amendment 111 Stanislav Polčák

PE680.715v02-00 48/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas biodiversity makes a fundamentally positive contribution to human health, given that up to 80% of the medicines used by humans are of natural origin;

Or. cs

Amendment 112 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas forest account for 43% of the EU’s land area and contain 80% of its terrestrial biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 113 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cb. whereas nature is deteriorating at a rate and scale unprecedented in human history;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 49/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 114 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas forestry activities are the second largest pressure category reported for species, affecting in particular arthropods, mammals and non-vascular plants; whereas many forest-dependent species are reported to be affected by the removal of dead, dying and old trees (including salvage logging), forest management reducing old-growth forests and clear-cutting;

Or. en

Amendment 115 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas the successful implementation of the Strategy requires an effective cooperation at EU and Member States level including civil society, public authorities and business, in particular stakeholders specifically affected by the measures foreseen in the Strategy, especially in the agriculture, fisheries, forestry and extractive sectors;

Or. en

Amendment 116 Ville Niinistö, Eleonora Evi, Francisco Guerreiro

PE680.715v02-00 50/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. Whereas light pollution alters the natural night light levels for humans, animals and plants, thus negatively affecting biodiversity by, for example, unbalancing the migratory, nocturnal and reproductive activity of animals, leading also to the loss of insects and pollinators, who are fatally drawn to artificial light;

Or. en

Amendment 117 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas, according to the 2019 IPBES Global Assessment Report, both the illegal and legal trade in, and use of, wildlife significantly contributes to biodiversity decline, and the destruction of natural habitats and the exploitation of wildlife are linked to the emergence and spread of infectious diseases;

Or. en

Amendment 118 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 51/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas soil is a shared resource and its biodiversity is under increasing pressure; whereas EU-wide monitoring of soil biodiversity, trends in its range and volume, should complement regular LUCAS survey of physico-chemical parameters in long-term;

Or. en

Amendment 119 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas the good ecological status of our environment is vital to fight climate change; whereas the ocean and forests are two major ecosystems playing a fundamental role in climate mitigation and adaptation;

Or. en

Amendment 120 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas IPBES estimates that 90% of land is projected to be significantly altered by 2050 and 75% of land has already been significantly altered; whereas 85% of wetlands areas

PE680.715v02-00 52/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN have already been lost;

Or. en

Amendment 121 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas densification generally entails the risk of cutting city dwellers off from nature and exposing them to multiple nuisances (air pollution, noise, etc.);

Or. fr

Amendment 122 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas approximately 75% of the world’s food crop is dependent on insect pollinators and whereas pollinator numbers have dramatically declined in recent decades;

Or. cs

Amendment 123 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C c (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 53/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cc. whereas there is a need to include pro-active management actions to enable the recovery of wild species of fauna and flora across habitats;

Or. en

Amendment 124 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems have potential direct and indirect economic benefits for most sectors of the economy; whereas all businesses depend on natural capital assets and ecosystem services either directly or indirectly, including through their supply chains; whereas an improved biodiversity policy with effective measures has the potential to strengthen the competitiveness of the economy and industry and to open new job and economic opportunities, for instance in the fields of environmental technology, bio-economy, tourism and recreation, nature conservation and the provision of ecosystem services;

Or. en

Amendment 125 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

PE680.715v02-00 54/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas according to the IPBES, pollution is one of the five drivers of biodiversity loss; whereas it is estimated that robust information exists for about 500 chemicals and by April 2019, ECHA considered 450 substances as being sufficiently regulated; whereas another 10 000 substances are considered to have their risks fairly well characterised, while limited risk information is available for around 20 000 substances; whereas the majority, around 70 000 substances have hardly any information on their hazards or exposures; whereas significant knowledge gaps regarding all impacts of chemicals on the biodiversity and environment need to be urgently closed;

Or. en

Amendment 126 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas climate change affects biodiversity as climate variables largely determine the geographical distribution ranges of species; whereas in areas where the climate is no longer suitable, some species shift their geographical ranges and others go extinct locally, depending on their dispersal capacities; whereas species phenology and physiology, community structures and ecosystem functions are also exacerbating the challenge to manage and conserve biodiversity;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 55/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 127 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas biodiversity loss associated with transformation of landscapes can lead to increased emerging disease risk in some cases, where species that adapt well to human- dominated landscapes are also able to harbour pathogens that pose a high risk of zoonotic transmission;

Or. en

Amendment 128 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories are biodiversity hotspots and host 80% of the EU marine biodiversity, and their economies are largely based on fishing and tourism activities;

Or. en

Amendment 129 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

PE680.715v02-00 56/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas biodiversity is an integral part of the world’s cultural heritage, often representing a symbol and an element of high value;

Or. cs

Amendment 130 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cd. whereas of all the mammals on Earth, 60% are livestock and only 4% are wild1a; ______1a Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America - May 21, 2018

Or. en

Amendment 131 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas biodiversity conservation and conservation of insects are inextricably linked; whereas the framework and actions of the current EU Pollinators Initiative require reinforcement and effective integration

AM\1225089EN.docx 57/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN across EU sectoral policies; whereas monitoring, research and other activities related to insect protection are fragmented, often inadequate, under- funded or non-existing on national level; whereas it proves beneficial to stimulate joint activities of citizens, municipalities, farmers, associations, businesses, educational institutions, other societal players and authorities to engage in nature conservation and restoration;

Or. en

Amendment 132 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas Nature-based solutions (NbS) have the potential to provide a strong policy connection between the three Rio Conventions on Biodiversity, Climate Change and Desertification providing an opportunity for Presidencies and Secretariats of all three agreements to work together to achieve closer linkages towards the 2021 Year for Nature to address climate change and biodiversity loss in an integrated and coherent manner;

Or. en

Amendment 133 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

PE680.715v02-00 58/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas ecological restoration, which is critical for conservation, climate adaptation and provision of ecosystem services, should integrate health considerations to avoid potential increased disease risk resulting from increased human-livestock-wildlife contact;

Or. en

Amendment 134 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas marine hotspots such as coral reefs, mangroves and seagrass beds are strongly degraded and threated by climate change and pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 135 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas 70% of birds are farmed chickens or other poultry, with a worryingly low level of genetic diversity, and only 30% of birds are wild;

AM\1225089EN.docx 59/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 136 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Recital C e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ce. whereas biodiversity is important for food security, the world economy and the traditional lives of local communities and indigenous peoples;

Or. cs

Amendment 137 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital C f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cf. whereas resilient ecosystems are rich in species; whereas Natura 2000 contributes to the conservation of species but many other threatened species remain outside this network; whereas the widening of protected areas is intended to safeguard biodiversity, contribute to climate change mitigation and adaption and generate substantial returns in investment and job opportunities;

Or. en

Amendment 138 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

PE680.715v02-00 60/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Recital C f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cf. whereas loss of biodiversity is tightly coupled to economic activities and economic growth as highlighted by the EEA; whereas there is no evidence of economy-wide, national or international absolute resource decoupling, and no evidence of the kind of decoupling needed for ecological sustainability;

Or. en

Amendment 139 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Recital C g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Cg. whereas current negative trends in biodiversity and ecosystems will undermine progress towards not only SDG targets explicitly related to these, but also towards SDG targets related to poverty, hunger, health, water, cities, climate, oceans and land; whereas failure to achieve progress in these areas will most severely affect the world's poorest communities, including indigenous peoples; whereas loss and degradation of biodiversity must therefore be considered not only as environmental issues but also as developmental, economic, social and moral ones;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 61/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 140 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Subheading 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Current biodiversity status Current biodiversity and ecosystem status

Or. fr

Amendment 141 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; recognises, however, the need to set balanced targets in each Member State, given the diversity of farming and forestry practices and the efforts made to date to observe the principles of economic, environmental and social sustainability;

Or. it

Amendment 142 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; recognises, however, the need to set balanced targets in each Member State, given the diversity of farming and forestry

PE680.715v02-00 62/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN practices and the efforts made to date to observe the principles of economic, environmental and social sustainability;

Or. it

Amendment 143 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; recognises, however, the need for a realistic and balanced approach in the implementation of the Strategy in which all three dimensions (Society, Environment and Economy) of sustainability are acknowledged;

Or. en

Amendment 144 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; stresses the strong link to the European Green Deal including the Farm to Fork Strategy and the need to reach coherence and a sound balance between the different high-level policy goals;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 63/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 145 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition, in order to achieve further nature protection, restoration of degraded ecosystems, addressing the negative effects of intensive agriculture;

Or. en

Amendment 146 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and the ambition to reverse biodiversity loss by ensuring that by 2050 all of the world’s ecosystems are conserved, resilient and adequately protected;

Or. en

Amendment 147 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber, Hildegard Bentele

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity

PE680.715v02-00 64/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition ; recalls that there should be a coherent approach with the Farm to Fork strategy and the new EU Forest strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 148 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; stresses that is has to based on facts and underpinned by sound science and its goals need to be realistic;

Or. en

Amendment 149 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 but warns that its level of ambition is insufficient to deal with the current threats and to preserve and restore biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 150 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

AM\1225089EN.docx 65/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 but warns that its level of ambition is insufficient to overcome current threats and fully preserve and restore biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 151 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity 1. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; with respect to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;

Or. en

Amendment 152 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Welcomes the achievements reached over the last 25 years; stresses that the EU has built the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world; recalls that Natura 2000 stretches across all Member States and

PE680.715v02-00 66/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN currently covers over 18% of the EU’s land area and more than 6% of its seas territories; highlights that the Natura 2000 biogeographical process encourages cooperation and makes sure that protection measures can be tailored to suit specific regional needs;

Or. en

Amendment 153 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Alexander Bernhuber, Jens Gieseke

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Calls on the Commission before proposing any targets to conduct a comprehensive evidence-based impact assessment of all strategies combining the individual and cumulative impacts on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture in the EU, generational renewal, food security and prices, and the potential risks of displacing biodiversity losses abroad by the replacement of local agricultural production with imports;

Or. en

Amendment 154 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; recognises, however, the need to set targets in each Member State, given

AM\1225089EN.docx 67/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN the diversity of farming and forestry practices and the efforts made to date to observe the principles of economic, environmental and social sustainability;

Or. it

Amendment 155 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Welcomes the new EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its level of ambition; stresses, however, that it has to respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and to maintain balance of all three dimensions of sustainability; calls for a thorough impact assessment for any legislative proposal from the Commission and a very careful approach towards any new legally binding instruments;

Or. en

Amendment 156 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Calls on the Commission to carry out holistic and cumulative assessments of the impact of the implementation of the strategy’s measures and targets on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture and forestry within and outside the EU, on food safety and on prices;

PE680.715v02-00 68/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. it

Amendment 157 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Expresses regret that this is the third Biodiversity Strategy or Action Plan with a headline objective of halting loss of Europe's biodiversity; stresses the importance of this Biodiversity Strategy to fully deliver on its headline target;

Or. en

Amendment 158 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1a. Notes that the assessment in the state of nature in the European Union report shows that the EU has not yet managed to stop the decline of protected habitat types and species of EU conservation concern;

Or. en

Amendment 159 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 69/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 1 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1b. Takes note of the fact that there already exists a substantial network of protected areas within the Union; welcomes the fact that the Union is a global leader when it comes to environmental protection;

Or. en

Amendment 160 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1b. Points out that numerous protected areas and habitats only emerged through human use; stresses that for the preservation of these protected areas and habitats further management is essential;

Or. en

Amendment 161 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1c. Calls on the Commission to provide thorough impact assessments of the implementation of the strategy’s measures and targets on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture and forestry in and outside of the EU, food

PE680.715v02-00 70/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN security and prices;

Or. en

Amendment 162 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1d. Calls on the Commission to establish regular evidence-based evaluations of the implementation of the Strategy, in order to adjust the measures and targets to a more restraint or ambitious approach; stresses the importance of appropriate target-related measures taking into account active market demand; calls on the Commission to submit mid-term reviews for every legislative proposal corresponding to the strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 163 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1e. Stresses that biodiversity is also crucial for safeguarding food security in the EU; highlights the important role of the European agricultural sector regarding the production of healthy, safe and affordable foods;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 71/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 164 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining at a rate unprecedented in human history and around 1 million in human history and around 1 million species are threatened with extinction; species are threatened with extinction; strongly regrets that the Union has neither strongly regrets that the Union has neither fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy objectives nor the global Aichi objectives nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Biodiversity Targets; urges the Commission and the Member States to commit to immediate, substantial and additional measures on biodiversity conservation and restoration in order to achieve of all the objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 165 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining at a rate unprecedented in human history and around 1 million in human history and around 1 million species are threatened with extinction; species are threatened with extinction; strongly regrets that the Union has neither strongly regrets that the Union has neither fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy objectives nor the global Aichi objectives nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Biodiversity Targets; considers that better monitoring of the implementation of targets, be they European or global, will be needed in the future;

PE680.715v02-00 72/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. fr

Amendment 166 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining at a rate unprecedented in human history and around 1 million in human history and around 1 million species are threatened with extinction; species, out of an estimated total of 8.1 strongly regrets that the Union has neither million, are threatened with extinction; fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy strongly regrets that the Union has neither objectives nor the global Aichi fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy Biodiversity Targets; objectives nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets;

Or. en

Amendment 167 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is globally declining at a rate in human history and around 1 million unprecedented in human history and species are threatened with extinction; around 1 million species are threatened strongly regrets that the Union has neither with extinction; strongly regrets that the fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy Union has neither fully met the 2020 objectives nor the global Aichi biodiversity strategy objectives set in 2010 Biodiversity Targets; nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 73/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 168 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining and around 1 million in human history and around 1 million species are threatened with extinction; species are threatened with extinction; strongly regrets that the Union has neither strongly regrets that the Union has neither fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy objectives nor the global Aichi objectives nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Biodiversity Targets;

Or. en

Amendment 169 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining at a rate unprecedented in human history and around 1 million in human history and around 1 million species are threatened with extinction; species are threatened with extinction; strongly regrets that the Union has indicates, that in Europe climate change neither fully met the 2020 biodiversity is the main driver behind biodiversity strategy objectives nor the global Aichi loss;1a Biodiversity Targets; ______1a Dullinger, I., Gattringer, A., Wessely, J., Moser, D., Plutzar, C., Willner, W., Egger, C., Gaube, V., Haberl, H., Mayer, A., Bohner, A., Gilli, C., Pascher, K. Essl,

PE680.715v02-00 74/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN F. & Dullinger, S. 2020: A socio- ecological model for predicting impacts of land-use and climate change on regional plant diversity. Global Change Biology.

Or. en

Amendment 170 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Recalls the conclusions of the 2. Recalls the conclusions of the IPBES report of 2019, according to which IPBES report of 2019, according to which nature is declining at a rate unprecedented nature is declining at a rate unprecedented in human history and around 1 million in human history and numerous species species are threatened with extinction; are threatened with extinction; strongly strongly regrets that the Union has neither regrets that the Union has neither fully met fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy the 2020 biodiversity strategy objectives objectives nor the global Aichi nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets; Biodiversity Targets;

Or. it

Amendment 171 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Notes the significant achievements of sustainable forest management (SFM) since the 1990s in increasing the land- area covered by forests in Europe by 9 per cent and simultaneously strengthening of carbon storage in the European forests by 50 per cent, while maintaining the populations of common bird species (State of Europe's Forests 2020); highlights the importance of long-term sustainable

AM\1225089EN.docx 75/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN management and use of peatlands and forests, as well as protection; considers that SFM is an effective way to maintain and enhance biodiversity, the vitality of forests and the adaptation to changing conditions, as well as to prevent damages, such as pests, non-native species and diseases, also in the protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 172 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Acknowledges the efforts made to date by the EU Member States and by the various sectors involved and stakeholders, in particular in the agriculture and forestry sector; emphasises that sustainable and effective management of natural processes is of the utmost importance for maintaining biodiversity, and that, in particular, greater efforts should be made to link different urban, agricultural and protected areas that support biodiversity in relation to the negative impact of climate change; recognises that the EU already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world;

Or. it

Amendment 173 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 76/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Highlights the poor status of European Forests; stresses that in some biogeographical regions as little as 5% of Annex I forest habitats are in favourable conservation status1a;underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy requires Member States to ensure no deterioration in conservation trends and status of all protected habitats and species; notes significant levels of further deterioration of forest ecosystems in unfavourable conservation status across the most of biogeographical regions2a; ______1a Boreal biogeographical region with 4,84% and Atlantic with 4,94% in favourable status, in accordance with data (2019) reported pursuant to the Art. 17 of Habitats Directive for the period 2013- 2018 2a data(2019) reported pursuant to the Art. 17 of Habitats Directive for the period2013-2018

Or. en

Amendment 174 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. whereas the 2020 report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) states that human activities causing climate change and biodiversity loss also fuel the risk of pandemic through their impacts on our environment, that the risk of pandemic can be significantly reduced by reducing the human activities that fuel biodiversity

AM\1225089EN.docx 77/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN loss, and that the estimated cost of reducing the risk of pandemics is 100 times less than the cost of responding to them1a; ______1a https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020- 12/IPBES%20Pandemics%20Report%20 Media%20Release.pdf

Or. en

Amendment 175 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Acknowledges the efforts made to date by the EU Member States and by the various sectors involved and stakeholders, in particular in the agriculture and forestry sector; emphasises that sustainable and effective management of natural processes is of the utmost importance for maintaining biodiversity, in particular in relation to the negative impact of climate change; recognises that the EU already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world;

Or. it

Amendment 176 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Acknowledges the efforts made to

PE680.715v02-00 78/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN date by EU Member States and by the various sectors involved and stakeholders, in particular in the agriculture and forestry sector; emphasises that sustainable and effective management of natural processes is of the utmost importance for maintaining biodiversity, in particular in relation to the negative impact of climate change; recognises that the EU already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world;

Or. it

Amendment 177 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. regrets that EU Member States have not met the 2020 objective of a good environmental status for marine waters as specified in the Marine Strategic Framework Directive; recalls that the MSFD will play a crucial role in the implementation of the biodiversity strategy objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 178 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Emphasises the strong interconnection between biodiversity loss,

AM\1225089EN.docx 79/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN climate change and theCOVID-19 pandemic; highlights the close links between human, animal and planet health, in the context of increased human - livestock - wildlife contacts and ecosystem degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 179 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Points out that, according to the latest figures, there are 1 525 ecoregions on the planet, divided into three categories: terrestrial ecoregions, freshwater ecoregions and coastal and marine ecoregions; stresses that each ecoregion is home to a variety of ecosystems and natural environments;

Or. fr

Amendment 180 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Notes the importance of sustainable forest management (SFM) as an effective way to maintain and enhance biodiversity and the vitality of forests and to prevent pests and diseases also in protected areas.

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 80/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 181 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Stresses the need for a well- balanced Biodiversity Strategy taking into account both environmental, economic and health aspects;

Or. en

Amendment 182 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2b. Highlights the importance of taking into account the different biogeographical areas and notes the differences in calculated biodiversity loss; recalls that only one biodiversity hotspot (the Mediterranean basin) is located in Europe and calls for prioritising actions in this hotspot;

Or. en

Amendment 183 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 81/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 2b. Emphasises that ecosystems not only support the life of the organisms living within them but also provide services of benefit to humans; recalls that these services account for the equivalent of USD 33 000 billion per year (1.8 times the global gross national product);

Or. fr

Amendment 184 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2b. Regrets that while the Union has neither fully met the 2020 biodiversity strategy objectives nor the global Aichi Biodiversity Targets, good progress has been achieved in protecting and sustainably using biodiversity both in marine and terrestrial areas1a; ______1a https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/press/sustai nable-fisheries-commission-takes-stock- progress-implementation-eus-common- fisheries_en

Or. en

Amendment 185 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 82/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 2b. Notes with concern the substantial losses of forests species and habitats reported, recalls that five forest tree species are extinct in the wild, 42 forest tree species are critically endangered and 107 forest tree species are endangered in Europe;

Or. en

Amendment 186 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2b. Emphasises the role of climate change as a key driver behind biodiversity loss;

Or. en

Amendment 187 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2c. Underlines that changes in land use, and production and consumption patterns are one of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss; notes that the 10% target of non-productive elements in agricultural areas represents a challenge and without transformative changes of the CAP this is unlikely to be realised; notes the absence of linear landscape features1a, total absence of extensive pastures2a, a steep decrease in low input farming3ain some EU agricultural areas and notes with concern rare occurrences of positive

AM\1225089EN.docx 83/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN statistically relevant changes in the last decade; ______1a from the SWD -Commission recommendations for Slovakia’s CAP strategic plan 2a from the SWD -Commission recommendations for the Netherlands CAP strategic plan 3a halving from 2010 to 2017, SWD- Commission recommendations for Romania’s CAP strategic plan

Or. en

Amendment 188 Alexander Bernhuber, Petri Sarvamaa, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2c. Recognises the efforts made until now by the EU Member States and by different sectors and stakeholders, especially in agriculture and forestry; highlights the fact that sustainable and effective management of natural processes is of the utmost importance for maintaining biodiversity, particularly in relation to the negative impact of climate change; acknowledges that the EU already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world;

Or. en

Amendment 189 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth

PE680.715v02-00 84/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2d. Notes the significant achievements of sustainable forest management since the 1990s in increasing the land-area covered by forests in Europe by 9 % and simultaneously strengthening carbon storage in the European forests by 50 %, while maintaining the populations of common bird species1a; highlights the importance of long-term sustainable management and use of peatlands and forests, as well as protection; considers sustainable forest management as an effective way to maintain and enhance biodiversity, the vitality of forests and the adaptation to changing conditions, as well as to prevent damages, such as pests, non- native species and diseases, also in the protected areas; ______1a State of Europe's Forests 2020

Or. en

Amendment 190 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2d. Expresses concern over the state of freshwater ecosystems and specie;, notes that globally, migratory freshwater fish have declined by an average of 76% between 1970 and 2016 while declines in Europe have been the most serious at the level of 93% 1a; ______

AM\1225089EN.docx 85/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 1a Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands

Or. en

Amendment 191 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2e. Notes that logging is a factor posing a threat to the greatest number of species in some of the EU Member States1a as it causes loss of habitat, structures and substrates that species require, through the conversion of ancient woodlands to industrial stands; ______1a in Sweden, data from the Swedish Species Information Centre

Or. en

Amendment 192 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 86/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 2f. Notes that large-scale clearcutting is a legally applied forestry practice in number of Member States, including in protected areas in some cases; highlights that this practice negatively affects the symbiotic interdependent network of trees with fungi; stresses that according to science likeliness of reestablishment of this web after clearcut is almost non-existent; reiterates that clearcutting does not mimic natural disturbances by wildfire as, unlike a clearcut site, a site disturbed by wildfire is characterised by a very high amount of deadwood, by a number of living trees and soil open for colonisation of species; calls for a ban on clearcutting forest management across the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 193 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes Union’s current policies with the changes needed; needed; stresses that bold political action is required if we are to transform humanity's relationship with nature, which is what is required in order to escape from the very real prospect of an ever increasing number of pandemics; urges Member States and the Commission to urgently adopt and implement the policy options and recommendations in the IPBES' 2020 report on biodiversity loss and pandemics; notes that one of the recommendations is the formation of a

AM\1225089EN.docx 87/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN high-level intergovernmental council on pandemic prevention that would facilitate cooperation among governments and work at the crossroads of the three Rio conventions;

Or. en

Amendment 194 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the COVID-19 demonstrated the importance of the ‘One pandemic has demonstrated the importance Health’ principle in policy-making and that of holistically recognising the linkages transformative changes are needed; calls between human health, animal health and for an urgent rethinking of how to align the biodiversity through the ‘One Health’ Union’s current policies with the changes principle in policy-making and that needed; transformative changes are needed; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes needed; further calls on the Commission to present, in collaboration with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, a European Strategy against pandemics, including pandemics from zoonotic origins; believes that such a Strategy should put in place pandemic preparedness and prevention, further address the drivers of biodiversity loss, ensure long-term resilience, and ultimately contribute to the overall objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 195 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig,

PE680.715v02-00 88/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the current COVID- demonstrated the importance of the ‘One 19 pandemic has once again demonstrated Health’ principle in policy-making and that the importance of the ‘One Health’ transformative changes are needed; calls principle in policy-making and that far- for an urgent rethinking of how to align the reaching, transformative changes are Union’s current policies with the changes urgently needed in order to prevent future needed; pandemics; highlights in this regard the conclusions from the 2020 IPBES report on biodiversity and pandemics stating that activities driving the biodiversity and climate crises are also increasing the risk of pandemics; calls therefore for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the transformative changes needed with particular attention to food systems and trade;

Or. en

Amendment 196 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes in the lifestyle of for an urgent rethinking of how to align the the whole society are needed; calls for an Union’s current policies with the changes urgent rethinking of how to align the needed; Union’s current policies with the changes needed; highlights how the pandemic has also demonstrated the importance of a resilient food system to ensure that European citizens have access to safe,

AM\1225089EN.docx 89/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN affordable and high quality products even under challenging conditions and this should not be taken for granted;

Or. en

Amendment 197 Catherine Chabaud, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making which transformative changes are needed; calls aims at addressing both human and for an urgent rethinking of how to align the environmental factors together in a health Union’s current policies with the changes risk management framework and that needed; transformative changes are needed to build an effective risk management strategy to limit the threat of such infectious episodes occurring in the future; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes needed;

Or. en

Amendment 198 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; for an urgent rethinking of how to align the underlines that adhering to the ‘One Union’s current policies with the changes Welfare’ framework would further needed; enhance global health and wellbeing;

PE680.715v02-00 90/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes needed;

Or. en

Amendment 199 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; for an urgent rethinking of how to align the underlines that adhering to the ‘One Union’s current policies with the changes Welfare’ framework would further needed; enhance global health and wellbeing; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes needed;

Or. en

Amendment 200 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes Union’s current policies, including its needed; external action and development cooperation, with the changes needed;

Or. fr

AM\1225089EN.docx 91/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 201 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align the for an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes Union’s current policies with a holistic needed; and systematic approach to EU food policy, with the changes needed;

Or. en

Amendment 202 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed for an urgent rethinking of how to align throughout society; emphasises the the Union’s current policies with the need to align the Union’s changes needed; biodiversity initiatives with other climate and environmental policies;

Or. en

Amendment 203 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 92/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed to be for an urgent rethinking of how to align made; calls for an urgent alignment of the the Union’s current policies with the Union’s current policies with the changes changes needed; needed;

Or. en

Amendment 204 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that changes are needed; calls for an urgent transformative changes are needed; calls rethinking of how to align the Union’s for an urgent rethinking of how to align the current policies with the changes needed in Union’s current policies with the changes line with the principle of proportionality; needed;

Or. en

Amendment 205 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls far-reaching changes are needed; calls for

AM\1225089EN.docx 93/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN for an urgent rethinking of how to align the an urgent rethinking of how to align the Union’s current policies with the changes Union’s current policies with the changes needed; needed;

Or. it

Amendment 206 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls changes are needed; calls for an urgent for an urgent rethinking of how to align the rethinking of how to align the Union’s Union’s current policies with the changes current policies with the changes needed; needed;

Or. it

Amendment 207 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Stresses that the pandemic has 3. Stresses that the pandemic has demonstrated the importance of the ‘One demonstrated the importance of the ‘One Health’ principle in policy-making and that Health’ principle in policy-making and that transformative changes are needed; calls transformative changes are needed; calls for an urgent rethinking of how to align for an urgent alignment of the Union’s the Union’s current policies with the current policies with the changes needed; changes needed;

Or. en

Amendment 208

PE680.715v02-00 94/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Notes the sudden increase in the mean value of intensity of harvest for the years 2016–2018 with respect to the mean of the years 2004–2015 (by 43%) and 2011–2015 (49%); stresses that increased rates of natural disturbances from windstorms or fires have been factored out from the analysis and that the observed abrupt increase has been due to change in management1a; notes that this increase in harvested area is threatening ecosystems which primarily have had other functions other than wood production, including those not harvested for centuries; expresses serious concern over this continuous loss of irreplaceable natural values and bio-cultural legacy; ______1a Ceccherini, G., Duveiller, G., Grassi,G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2438-y

Or. en

Amendment 209 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Notes that healthy ecosystems are fundamental to human existence and well-being and that the right to food, health and security are human rights that cannot be provided without them; stresses

AM\1225089EN.docx 95/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN that access to critical ecosystem services such as clean water, food, forest products, flood control, and natural resources can be a cause or exacerbate poverty and that the equal access to the services provided by healthy ecosystems needs to be an important element to eliminate inequalities in Europe;

Or. en

Amendment 210 Alessandra Moretti

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Calls on the Commission to carry out holistic and cumulative assessments of the impact of implementation of the strategy’s measures and objectives on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture and forestry inside and outside the EU, on food safety and on prices, in view of their potentially significant economic, social and environmental effects;

Or. it

Amendment 211 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Recalls that biodiversity and ecosystem preservation is fundamental to the achievement of the SDGs; stresses the need and calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement effective

PE680.715v02-00 96/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN nature and biodiversity mainstreaming with biodiversity targets across all sectors, to change the economic model towards more sustainability;

Or. en

Amendment 212 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Underlines the importance of resilient and healthy forest ecosystems including fauna and flora, in order to maintain and enhance the delivery of the multiple ecosystem services that forests provide, such as biodiversity, clean air, clean water, water holding capacities, healthy soil and wood and non-wood raw materials;

Or. en

Amendment 213 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Stresses that all GDP ultimately relies on nature and natural resources and believes it is very sad that the Commission feels the need to provide a business case for biodiversity in order to protect it; fundamentally believes that the value of nature is not limited to its use or exchange value to humans;

AM\1225089EN.docx 97/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 214 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. whereas, in order to preserve the full scale of forest biodiversity and provide crucial microhabitats on which a number of species, including protected ones, are dependent, it is essential to strictly protect a proportion of forest areas from any form of active human intervention;

Or. en

Amendment 215 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Notes that only one target from the Biodiversity Strategy 2020 was met (to protect 10% of marine areas and 17% of terrestrial areas), and underlines therefore that all targets from the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 should be clearly defined and measurable in order to be achieved;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 98/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 216 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Believes that capitalism ignores and ultimately destroys ecological systems and that nature-society relations under capitalism lead to self-destruction; is highly critical of environmental economic valuation schemes and believes that the EU must not advocate for natural capital accounting;

Or. en

Amendment 217 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Points out that, according to the latest edition of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species (version 2020.3), of the 128 918 species studied, 35 765 are classified as threatened;

Or. fr

Amendment 218 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Recognises that different

AM\1225089EN.docx 99/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN environments (land, sea, air) are suffering different challenges; considers that detailed approaches should be taken into consideration depending on the domain;

Or. en

Amendment 219 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Stresses the link between biodiversity loss and human health, and underlines that the novel coronavirus has its origins in encroaching nature;

Or. en

Amendment 220 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Calls on the Commission to carry out an Impact Assessment on every single target set within the Biodiversity Strategy, to ensure that every measure set increases biodiversity by itself;

Or. en

Amendment 221 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene

PE680.715v02-00 100/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3a. Recommends that a thorough scientific investigation be carried out at EU level to assess the effectiveness and enforcement of EU legislation in the fight against wildlife trafficking and the measures taken against it; calls for a broad international approach and cooperation on pandemic prevention and for enhanced law enforcement on all aspects of the illegal wildlife trade;

Or. en

Amendment 222 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3b. Points out that achieving the EU´s goals for the environment, climate and biodiversity will never be possible without forests that are multifunctional, healthy and sustainably and managed applying a long-term perspective, together with viable forest-based industries;

Or. en

Amendment 223 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 101/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

3b. Recalls that around 20 % of the world’s coral reefs disappeared and a further 20 % became degraded during the last decades of the 20th century, and that around 35 % of mangrove areas were lost over the same period;

Or. fr

Amendment 224 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3b. Highlights that there is a direct link between biodiversity loss, deforestation, destruction of habitats and risk of zoonotic diseases or pandemics;

Or. en

Amendment 225 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3b. Recalls that nature's contributions to people are deteriorating worldwide;

Or. en

Amendment 226

PE680.715v02-00 102/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3b. Calls on the Commission to carry out holistic and cumulative impact assessments of the implementation of the strategy’s measures and targets on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture and forestry in and outside of the EU, and on food security and prices;

Or. en

Amendment 227 Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3c. Recalls the One Health principle, which reflects the fact that the health of people, animals and the environment are interconnected and that diseases may be transmitted from people to animals and vice versa; stresses, therefore, that diseases have to be tackled in both people and animals, while also taking into special consideration the food chain and the environment as well as illegal wildlife trade, which can be another source of resistant microorganisms; underlines the important role of the Commission in coordinating and supporting the One Health approach to human and animal health and the environment in the EU;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 103/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 228 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3c. Stresses that biodiversity and nature should not be merely considered as 'natural capital' or considered only in relation to their use or value to humans, but should instead be recognised as a common heritage of all on this planet of incalculable value; calls for an approach to biodiversity and nature that protects and restores it also for its intrinsic value in and of itself; rejects any attempt to monetise nature or calculate its value; believes any such attempt is only detrimental to nature;

Or. en

Amendment 229 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3c. Highlights that conservation of protected areas and measures that reduce unsustainable exploitation of high biodiversity regions will reduce the wildlife-livestock-human contact interface and help prevent the spill over of novel pathogens;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 104/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 230 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3c. Points out the need to develop a coherent approach to bring together biodiversity protection and climate protection in a thriving forest-based sector and bio-economy;

Or. en

Amendment 231 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Subheading 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Protection and restoration Protection and restoration in the light of the threats to all ecosystems

Or. fr

Amendment 232 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Subheading 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Protection and restoration Protection, restoration and sustainable management

Or. it

AM\1225089EN.docx 105/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 233 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Notes the targets of protecting a targets of protecting at least 30 % of the maximum of 30 % of the Union’s marine Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of and terrestrial areas; believes that these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these targets should be set at Union level and areas, including primary and old-growth should be achieved through a bottom-up forests; stresses that these should be approach through Member States’ binding and implemented by Member designations while taking into account the States in accordance with science-based different characteristics of each Member criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines State such as size, share of natural areas that in addition to increasing protected and sustainable forest management as areas, the quality of protected areas should well as the national and local be ensured and clear conservation plans circumstances, voluntary approaches and implemented; internationally recognised definitions to ensure consistency of collected data; notes the target of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary forests and other carbon-rich ecosystems and extensive agricultural land; while the references to strictly protected areas and primary forests require further clarification regarding their definitions; stresses that these should implemented at Member States’ level in accordance with science-based and site-specific criteria as well as biodiversity and climate needs; expresses strong support for these targets to be part of a clear international framework to ensure a level playing field; highlights the need of additional financial support for land owners of protected areas; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented and proper compensation for impacted stakeholders provided;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 106/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 234 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Takes note of the proposed targets targets of protecting at least 30 % of the of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly strictly protecting at least 10 % of these protecting at least 10 % of these areas, areas, including primary and old-growth including primary forests based on forests; stresses that these should be internationally recognised definitions; binding and implemented by Member stresses that before proposing relevant States in accordance with science-based legislation, targets should be based on a criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines holistic evaluation of the effectiveness of that in addition to increasing protected current protected areas and implemented areas, the quality of protected areas should Union-wide in accordance with science- be ensured and clear conservation plans based criteria and biodiversity needs; implemented; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation and management plans implemented; insists that those activities that are compatible with protection goals or even positively contribute to biodiversity protection must remain admissible in areas under strict protection; notes with concern that the Commission considers extractive activities such as fishing, hunting or forestry incompatible with strict protection, as expressed in a draft technical note on criteria and guidance for protected areas designations; echoes paragraph 10 of the Council Conclusions of 16 October 2020 on Biodiversity which highlights that stricter level of protection may allow for certain human activities, which are in line with the conservation objectives of the protected area;

Or. en

Amendment 235

AM\1225089EN.docx 107/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of effectively protecting at least 30 Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including through fish recovery areas, including primary and old-growth areas, as provided for under the Common forests; stresses that these should be Fisheries Policy, covering a sufficiently binding and implemented by Member diverse range of habitats and ecosystems States in accordance with science-based such as forests, wetlands, peatlands, criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines grasslands and coastal ecosystems, and that in addition to increasing protected strictly protecting at least 10 % of the areas, the quality of protected areas should Union's marine and terrestrial areas, be ensured and clear conservation plans including all remaining primary and old- implemented; growth forests, and other carbon rich ecosystems such as sea grass meadows; stresses that these targets should be binding and implemented by Member States at national level in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs and should create an ecologically coherent and representative network of protected areas; stresses that in line with international standards set out by the IUCN, all industrial and extractive activities (including inter-alia mining, industrial fishing and destructive fishing techniques, oil and gas extraction) and infrastructure development should be prohibited in protected areas; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured through the implementation of clear and effective conservation plans;

Or. en

Amendment 236 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

PE680.715v02-00 108/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of the areas, including primary and old-growth Union's marine and terrestrial areas, forests; stresses that these should be including all remaining primary and old- binding and implemented by Member growth forests, seagrass meadows and States in accordance with science-based other carbon rich ecosystems, including criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines coastal and marine ones; calls on the that in addition to increasing protected Commission to present a definition for areas, the quality of protected areas should strict protection, guided by the IUCN be ensured and clear conservation plans definition of protected areas and for such implemented; a definition to prohibit industrial and extractive activities in protected areas; stresses that the network of protected areas must be ecologically coherent and represent the full range of biodiversity in EU terrestrial and marine areas; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member States at national level, without effort-sharing in the implementation and in a timely manner in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas must be ensured through implementing fully financed, clear and effective conservation and management plans; calls for more ambitious targets to be set for the medium-long term, ensuring that 50% of marine and terrestrial areas are protected;

Or. en

Amendment 237 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

AM\1225089EN.docx 109/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of the areas, including primary and old-growth Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, forests; stresses that these should be including primary and old-growth forests, binding and implemented by Member carbon rich ecosystems including coastal States in accordance with science-based and marine ones; stresses that in line with criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines international standards all industrial and that in addition to increasing protected extractive activities should be prohibited areas, the quality of protected areas should in protected areas; stresses that these be ensured and clear conservation plans should be binding and implemented by implemented; Member States in accordance with science- based criteria and biodiversity needs; calls for more ambitious targets to be set in the medium-long term to ensure that at least 50% of marine and terrestrial areas are protected and to ensure that non-protected areas are ecologically managed, underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured, protected areas should be ecologically connected and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 238 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the implementation targets of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and for stricter strictly protecting at least 10 % of these protection of the areas recognised by areas, including primary and old-growth Member States as more fragile and at forests; stresses that these should be risk, including primary and old-growth binding and implemented by Member forests; stresses that these should be based States in accordance with science-based on scientifically detectable data, criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines proportionate, balanced and implemented that in addition to increasing protected by Member States in accordance with

PE680.715v02-00 110/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN areas, the quality of protected areas should science-based criteria and specific be ensured and clear conservation plans biodiversity needs, in line with the implemented; principle of subsidiarity and taking into account the various sustainable economic activities compatible with existing protected areas; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented, involving proper management that intelligently combines conservation targets with sustainable use and promotion of the corresponding environmental and economic benefits;

Or. it

Amendment 239 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Takes note of the proposed targets targets of protecting at least 30 % of the of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly strictly protecting at least 10 % of these protecting at least 10 % of these areas, areas, including primary and old-growth including primary and old-growth forests; forests; stresses that these should be highlights that sustainable agriculture binding and implemented by Member and forestry practices do not contradict States in accordance with science-based the objectives of strict protection, : stresses criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that before any targets are proposed, an that in addition to increasing protected impact assessment should be conducted, areas, the quality of protected areas should the targets should be science based and be ensured and clear conservation plans also take into account aspects like food implemented; security, generational renewal and access to land for young farmers as well as the benefits of sustainable management for biodiversity and carbon sequestration; underlines that the 10% should not mean non-intervention management as this is contradictory to biodiversity; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should

AM\1225089EN.docx 111/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 240 Alessandra Moretti

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; implemented; emphasises that the protection and restoration of rural areas and the protection of wild animal species must be consistent with local economic development, providing for sustainable management policies based on containment and careful monitoring of the spread of wildlife in the areas concerned;

Or. it

Amendment 241 Radan Kanev

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 112/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30% of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10% of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including in priority remaining forests; stresses that these should be primary and old-growth forests and other binding and implemented by Member ecosystems with high potential to store States in accordance with science-based carbon; stresses that these should be criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines binding and implemented by each Member that in addition to increasing protected States in accordance with science-based areas, the quality of protected areas should criteria and biodiversity needs, create a be ensured and clear conservation plans network of protected areas and be in line implemented; with the IUCN definition of protected areas; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured through effective monitoring and adaptive management and the implementation of clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 242 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member implemented by Member States in States in accordance with science-based accordance with science-based criteria and criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines biodiversity needs after agreeing on that in addition to increasing protected definitions of central concepts such as areas, the quality of protected areas should “protected” and “strictly protected” in be ensured and clear conservation plans consultation with relevant stakeholders implemented; and Member States.; emphasizes the importance of location-specific conservation objectives and measures as basis for the future management; underlines that in addition to increasing

AM\1225089EN.docx 113/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 243 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding, accompanied by voluntary States in accordance with science-based measures and incentives, and implemented criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines by Member States in accordance with that in addition to increasing protected science-based criteria and biodiversity areas, the quality of protected areas should needs; underlines that in addition to be ensured and clear conservation plans increasing protected areas, the quality of implemented; protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented so that the protection of biodiversity can be combined with productive activities that are beneficial for the environment, such as agricultural, livestock and forestry activities;

Or. es

Amendment 244 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the

PE680.715v02-00 114/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of the areas, including primary and old-growth Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, forests; stresses that these should be including primary and old-growth forests, binding and implemented by Member seagrass meadows and other carbon rich States in accordance with science-based ecosystems; stresses that according to criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines international standards by the IUCN all that in addition to increasing protected environmentally damaging industrial areas, the quality of protected areas should activities should be prohibited in protected be ensured and clear conservation plans areas; stresses that these targets should be implemented; binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 245 Nils Torvalds, Irena Joveva, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, stresses that the targets should be forests; stresses that these should be implemented by Member States, taking binding and implemented by Member into account the national circumstances States in accordance with science-based and internationally recognised definitions criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines of the forest in accordance with science- that in addition to increasing protected based criteria and biodiversity needs; areas, the quality of protected areas should underlines that in addition to increasing be ensured and clear conservation plans protected areas, the quality of protected implemented; areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; considers that measures already taken in Member States should be fully acknowledged in the implementation of the Biodiversity Strategy; stresses the need to respect and

AM\1225089EN.docx 115/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN support the rights of landowners;

Or. en

Amendment 246 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Notes the targets of protecting 30 % targets of protecting at least 30 % of the of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these these areas, including primary and old- areas, including primary and old-growth growth forests; stresses that these should forests; stresses that these should be be based on scientific, proportional and binding and implemented by Member calibrated data and implemented by States in accordance with science-based Member States in accordance with science- criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines based criteria and local biodiversity needs that in addition to increasing protected and with the principle of subsidiarity, also areas, the quality of protected areas should taking into account the different types of be ensured and clear conservation plans agriculture that characterise the protected implemented; areas; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented to allow the continuation of economic activities;

Or. it

Amendment 247 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Notes the targets of protecting 30 % targets of protecting at least 30 % of the of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of and of strictly protecting 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be based

PE680.715v02-00 116/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN forests; stresses that these should be on scientific, proportional and calibrated binding and implemented by Member data and implemented by Member States States in accordance with science-based in accordance with science-based criteria criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines and local biodiversity needs and with the that in addition to increasing protected principle of subsidiarity, also taking into areas, the quality of protected areas should account the different types of agriculture be ensured and clear conservation plans that characterise the protected areas; implemented; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented to allow the continuation of economic activities;

Or. it

Amendment 248 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting 30 % of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly strictly protecting at least 10 % of these protecting 10 % of these areas, including areas, including primary and old-growth primary and old-growth forests; stresses forests; stresses that these should be that these should be binding and binding and implemented by Member implemented by Member States in States in accordance with science-based accordance with science-based criteria and criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines biodiversity needs taking into account the that in addition to increasing protected national and local circumstances, areas, the quality of protected areas should voluntary approaches, and internationally be ensured and clear conservation plans recognized definitions to ensure implemented; consistency of collected data; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; calls for appropriate compensation in case of management;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 117/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 249 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; proposes the implementation of binding and implemented by Member commitments by Member States to achieve States in accordance with science-based these targets in accordance with science- criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines based criteria and biodiversity needs; that in addition to increasing protected underlines that in addition to increasing areas, the quality of protected areas should protected areas, the quality of protected be ensured and clear conservation plans areas should be ensured and clear implemented; conservation plans implemented, respecting the will of the EU Member States, as they alone will be able to take realistic and appropriate measures to protect nature and biodiversity in their national territory;

Or. fr

Amendment 250 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected

PE680.715v02-00 118/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; implemented; emphasises the need for ambitious targets and appropriate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms; further emphasises the importance of connectivity between protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 251 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Notes the targets of protecting at targets of protecting at least 30 % of the least 30 % of the Union’s marine and Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at strictly protecting at least 10 % of these least 10 % of these areas; stresses that areas, including primary and old-growth these targets must be preceded by the forests; stresses that these should be establishment of clear criteria and binding and implemented by Member definitions and implemented in accordance States in accordance with science-based with science-based criteria; criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 252 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Notes the target of protecting at targets of protecting at least 30 % of the least 30 % of the Union’s marine and Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of terrestrial areas; stresses that impact

AM\1225089EN.docx 119/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN strictly protecting at least 10 % of these assessments should evaluate the effects of areas, including primary and old-growth increasing the protected areas, including forests; stresses that these should be losses; stresses that this target should be binding and implemented by Member implemented by Member States in States in accordance with science-based accordance with science-based criteria and criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines biodiversity needs, socio-economic that in addition to increasing protected aspects, and respect for the property rights areas, the quality of protected areas should of farmland and forest owners; underlines be ensured and clear conservation plans that, in addition to increasing protected implemented; areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation and management plans implemented, together with adequate compensation for the effects suffered by stakeholders;

Or. it

Amendment 253 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests and other carbon-rich ecosystems; binding and implemented by Member stresses that these should be binding and States in accordance with science-based implemented by Member States in criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines accordance with science-based criteria that that in addition to increasing protected are specific to each site and biodiversity areas, the quality of protected areas should needs at local and regional level, as well be ensured and clear conservation plans as climate needs; underlines that in implemented; addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans, specific to each site, implemented;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 120/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 254 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; implemented; emphasises that primary forests are irreplaceable and the loss of primary forests cannot be compensated by a new forest-based approach;

Or. en

Amendment 255 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of the areas, including primary and old-growth Union's marine and terrestrial areas, forests; stresses that these should be including all primary and old-growth binding and implemented by Member forests; stresses that these should be States in accordance with science-based binding and implemented by Member criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines States in accordance with science-based that in addition to increasing protected criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines areas, the quality of protected areas should that in addition to increasing protected

AM\1225089EN.docx 121/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN be ensured and clear conservation plans areas, the quality of protected areas should implemented; be ensured through the implementation of clear conservation plans, proper management, monitoring, controls and legal enforcement of relevant legislation;

Or. en

Amendment 256 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States, in cooperation with their local and criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines regional authorities, in accordance with that in addition to increasing protected the whole-of-government approach, areas, the quality of protected areas should science-based criteria and biodiversity be ensured and clear conservation plans needs; underlines that in addition to implemented; increasing protected areas, the quality and effective management of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented and monitored;

Or. en

Amendment 257 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 122/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas which are the most vulnerable to forests; stresses that these should be climate change, focussing on carbon-rich binding and implemented by Member ecosystems, such as primary and old- States in accordance with science-based growth forests; stresses that these should criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines be binding and implemented by Member that in addition to increasing protected States in accordance with science-based areas, the quality of protected areas should criteria and biodiversity and climate be ensured and clear conservation plans targets for each area; underlines that in implemented; addition to increasing protected areas, the aim of the protection should be well- defined and realistic and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 258 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; implemented, as well as the proper management of these areas thanks to better human and financial resources;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 123/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 259 Esther de Lange, Jan Huitema

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses support for an EU-wide targets of protecting at least 30 % of the target of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and Union’s marine and natural areas, on the of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these basis of a favourable impact assessment areas, including primary and old-growth which also assesses the need of strictly forests; stresses that these should be protecting at least 10 % of these areas, binding and implemented by Member including primary and old-growth forests; States in accordance with science-based stresses that these should be in accordance criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines with science-based criteria which take into that in addition to increasing protected account biodiversity needs as well as areas, the quality of protected areas should cultural and socioeconomic aspects; be ensured and clear conservation plans underlines that in addition to increasing implemented; protected areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 260 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, with a priority for primary and old- forests; stresses that these should be growth forests, and other carbon-rich binding and implemented by Member ecosystems; stresses that these should be States in accordance with science-based binding and implemented by Member criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines States in accordance with science-based that in addition to increasing protected and site-specific criteria as well as areas, the quality of protected areas should biodiversity needs; underlines that in be ensured and clear conservation plans addition to increasing protected areas, the

PE680.715v02-00 124/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN implemented; quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear site-specific conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 261 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented; implemented in order to stop the extinction of animal, bird and plant species;

Or. en

Amendment 262 Christian Doleschal

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Affirms support for the targets of targets of protecting at least 30 % of the protecting at least 30% of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly strictly protecting at least 10 % of these protecting at least 10% of these areas, areas, including primary and old-growth including primary and old growth forests;

AM\1225089EN.docx 125/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN forests; stresses that these should be stresses that a thorough impact assessment binding and implemented by Member should take place before these targets are States in accordance with science-based implemented by Member States following criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines science-based criteria, biodiversity needs that in addition to increasing protected and food security aspects; underlines that areas, the quality of protected areas should in addition to increasing protected areas, be ensured and clear conservation plans the quality of protected areas should be implemented; ensured and clear practicable conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 263 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing the number areas, the quality of protected areas should and size of protected areas, be ensured and clear conservation plans representativeness, good management and implemented; the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. fr

Amendment 264 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

PE680.715v02-00 126/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses support for the targets of targets of protecting at least 30% of the protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly strictly protecting at least 10% of these protecting at least 10 % of these areas, areas, including primary and old-growth including primary and old-growth forests, forests; stresses that these should be if ecologically, socially and economically binding and implemented by Member possible; stresses that these should be States in accordance with science-based binding and implemented by Member criteria and biodiversity needs; stresses States in accordance with science-based that, in addition to increasing the number criteria and biodiversity needs; stresses of protected areas, the quality of protected that, in addition to increasing the number areas should be ensured and clear of protected areas, the quality of protected conservation plans implemented; areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. fi

Amendment 265 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, the quality of protected areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans be ensured and clear conservation plans, implemented; with effective surveillance and monitoring, introduced.

Or. en

Amendment 266

AM\1225089EN.docx 127/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Jytte Guteland

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should fully binding and implemented by Member reflect national and local States in accordance with science-based circumstances and be implemented by criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines Member States in accordance with science- that in addition to increasing protected based criteria and biodiversity needs; areas, the quality of protected areas should underlines that in addition to increasing be ensured and clear conservation plans protected areas, the quality of protected implemented; areas should be ensured and clear conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 267 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Expresses strong support for the 4. Expresses strong support for the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the targets of protecting at least 30 % of the Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of Union’s marine and terrestrial areas, and of strictly protecting at least 10 % of these strictly protecting at least 10 % of these areas, including primary and old-growth areas, including primary and old-growth forests; stresses that these should be forests; stresses that these should be binding and implemented by Member binding and implemented by Member States in accordance with science-based States in accordance with science-based criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines criteria and biodiversity needs; underlines that in addition to increasing protected that in addition to increasing protected areas, the quality of protected areas should areas, their quality and connectivity of be ensured and clear conservation plans protected areas should be ensured and clear implemented; conservation plans implemented;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 128/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 268 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Underlines that a majority of terrestrial biodiversity is in forested areas and that the conservation status of forest habitats and species covered by EU nature legislation shows no significant signs of improvement; stresses that 80 % of the forests in the EU with protected status are in an unfavourable or bad conservation state; recognises that protection of part of the forests will not alone halt the decline of forest biodiversity and that therefore it is necessary to also move towards more biodiversity inclusive management practises in managed forests such as proforestation and increasing the diversity of tree species and that practises such as clearcutting, must be phased out; calls for regular monitoring of the real impact of forestry on forest habitats and species across Europe; calls on a European Commission definition of sustainable and biodiversity inclusive forest management to protect and restore biodiversity in managed forests;

Or. en

Amendment 269 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Underlines that a high fraction (54%) of mapped primary forests is not

AM\1225089EN.docx 129/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN under strict protection currently and that timber harvesting or salvage logging may jeopardise the untouched nature of these forests; recalls that wide patches of primary forest are being currently logged in many mountain areas, for instance in Romania and Slovakia or in several Balkan countries1a; considers ensuring strict protection of the remaining primary and old-growth forests most urgent and calls on the Commission and Member States to harmonise existing data and fill in the gaps regarding the location of these forests, and to create a database of all potential sites fulfilling the quality of old- growth and primary forests retroactively in the year 2020 with a temporary moratorium on logging of all the respective sites to prevent their purposeful destruction and to legally ensure the non- intervention status of the confirmed ones without delay; ______1a Sabatini FM, Burrascano S, Keeton WS, et al. Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Divers Distrib. 2018;24:1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12778

Or. en

Amendment 270 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Underlines that for the successful conservation of protected areas, including strictly protected areas, decision-making at the site level together with the Member States should be promoted, taking into account regional characteristics within

PE680.715v02-00 130/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the EU and the international obligations resulting from the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework to be agreed at the upcoming 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity;

Or. en

Amendment 271 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Highlights that an effective implementation of the strategy depends on its acceptance in rural communities which are often economically and socially dependant on land- and forest-use; underlines in this regard the need to take into account economic and social aspects along with the environmental pillars of sustainability in a balanced way and to include local stakeholders in the process of protected area designation;

Or. en

Amendment 272 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Emphasises that successful conservation of protected areas, including strictly protected areas, requires decision- making at the level of, and based on the

AM\1225089EN.docx 131/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN needs of, the individual sites, taking into account the regional, socio-economic and cultural characteristics of the areas within the EU, with a view to promoting community-based conservation;

Or. it

Amendment 273 Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Emphasises the importance of sustainable fish production and fisheries for the preservation of natural habitats for many endangered species; acknowledges the management tasks and ecosystem services which are fulfilled through these activities; recognises that these habitats can only be maintained by active, close-to-nature cultivation;

Or. en

Amendment 274 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Emphasises that the protection and restoration of rural areas and the protection of wild animal species must be consistent with local economic development, providing for sustainable management policies based on containment and careful monitoring of the spread of wildlife in the areas concerned;

PE680.715v02-00 132/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. it

Amendment 275 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses that this network of protected areas should be based on the Natura 2000 network and may be complemented by additional designations by Member States, where existing national categories of protected areas and certain other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs, as defined by the CBD) should be recognised;

Or. en

Amendment 276 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Highlights that the criteria and definitions for strictly protected areas should recognise that each Member State has different local and regional characteristics, and that decision-making should be in accordance with the site- specific conservation objectives of each protected area;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 133/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 277 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Urges the Commission to consider the threats that legal wildlife trade poses to biodiversity, human and animal health and welfare, within the framework of the evaluation of the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking and the planned related initiatives;

Or. en

Amendment 278 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Welcomes the ongoing participatory processes of defining, mapping and monitoring primary and old- growth forests, aiming to ensure their conservation; believes that these efforts and the implementation of the Strategy should take into account national conditions;

Or. en

Amendment 279 Ondřej Knotek, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 134/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses that a clear definition of strict protection needs to be established in agreement between Member States and the Commission leaving Member States enough flexibility to take into account specificities of their natural conditions and national legislations

Or. en

Amendment 280 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Points out that the European Union already has the largest coordinated network of protected areas in the world; calls for an in-depth evaluation of the effectiveness of current protected terrestrial areas to be carried out before extending the boundaries of those areas;

Or. fr

Amendment 281 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen the network of Marine protected areas through enhanced management, stronger spatial planning, evaluations and enforcement in order to increase ecological coherence

AM\1225089EN.docx 135/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN and connectivity of marine protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 282 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses that, instead of area- related targets, Member States should establish and monitor the fulfilment of qualitative criteria in protected areas, so that the end results are as good as possible from a qualitative point of view, i.e. in terms of biodiversity;

Or. fi

Amendment 283 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Recognises the positive impact of sustainable forest management has on European forest biodiversity; notes that forest protection and production are not in contradiction, but rather complementary goals and can be coupled;

Or. en

Amendment 284 Tudor Ciuhodaru

PE680.715v02-00 136/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Considers that it is necessary to organise a Europe-wide awareness campaign on protecting biodiversity and extending protected areas, targeting different age categories, and young people in particular;

Or. ro

Amendment 285 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses the need for the strategy to observe the principle of subsidiarity as well as to recognise the EU’s competences in the area of protection of the environment, including forests;

Or. en

Amendment 286 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Welcomes the emphasis on setting up ecological corridors to prevent genetic isolations, allow for species migration, and maintain and enhance healthy

AM\1225089EN.docx 137/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 287 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses the importance of European cross-border biodiversity projects such as REDVERT (the Green and Blue Network of the Basque Eurocity);

Or. fr

Amendment 288 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Stresses the importance of healthy and resilient forest ecosystems, which fulfil multiple functions, and of the protection of remaining primary forests;

Or. en

Amendment 289 Tilly Metz

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 138/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Insists that hunting should be prohibited in marine and terrestrial protected areas

Or. en

Amendment 290 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Further believes that the 10 % of land should be set aside for wilderness and non-intervention management;

Or. en

Amendment 291 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Expresses its concern about a possible common EU-level definition on old-growth forests;

Or. en

Amendment 292 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 139/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4a. Calls for specific measures to address biodiversity loss outside protected nature areas;

Or. en

Amendment 293 Ville Niinistö, Michal Wiezik

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Stresses that for forest restoration, pro-forestation (allowing natural forests to grow older and larger, and re- naturalising plantation forests), as recognised by the European Parliament report on the EU’s role to protect and restore the world’s forests, is the quickest way to recover biodiversity, resilience, ecosystem integrity and stability, long- lived carbon stocks in forests; underlines that reforestation can play a role, but must focus on re-establishing natural forests; highlights that afforestation (planting forests in non-forest biomes), should only be contemplated if needed to improve ecological connectivity between protected areas and to improve landscape scale resilience, whilst promoting planting of mixed native species as opposed to monoculture plantations; underlines that to incentivise forest restoration, new mechanisms for payment for ecosystem services must be developed, which can help add value to nature conservation protection;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 140/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 294 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Emphasises that it is important for the EU and the global biodiversity strategies to have the same level of ambition, particularly with regard to the level of protection; emphasises that the updated zero draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, which takes into account the results of the second meeting of the Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, does not include a reference to strict protection; calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that any soil protection targets are sufficiently flexible to allow their implementation to take account of the specific conditions and opportunities in each country and the rights of land and forest owners, with strict protection being a voluntary option for land and forest owners;

Or. it

Amendment 295 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Deplores the content of the Commission's 'Draft technical note on criteria and guidance for protected areas designations"; regrets that fishing and hunting activities, are not compatible with the targets of the EU Biodiversity Strategy; believes that the

AM\1225089EN.docx 141/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN recommendation for the Member States to exclude hunting and fishing activities is a disproportionate act and should be revised; calls on the Commission, together with the Member States, to revise its recommendations for the ‘Criteria for the identification of areas under strict protection’;

Or. en

Amendment 296 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Stresses that restoration efforts should to a maximum possible extent support natural regeneration; emphasises that for forest ecosystems this means respecting early seral stages, including those produced by natural disasters, as these, together with late seral stages are characterised by the highest levels of biodiversity, which correlates with a high amount of dead wood as crucial habitat and substrate for number of specialised species;

Or. en

Amendment 297 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Underlines that for a successful

PE680.715v02-00 142/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN conservation of protected areas, including strictly protected areas, decision-making at the site level should be promoted to ensure community conservation can be incentivised, while taking into account the international obligations from the post- 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework at the upcoming 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity;

Or. en

Amendment 298 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Recalls the European Parliament Resolution of 15 November 2017 on an Action Plan for nature, people and the economy and reiterates its call to the Commission to fully implement the Habitats Directive by developing an assessment procedure to enable the protection status of species in particular regions to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached;

Or. en

Amendment 299 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. 4 b. Underlines that the Antarctica

AM\1225089EN.docx 143/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN territory is home to an extremely rich wildlife ecosystem of flora and fauna, which are already subject to many cumulative pressures such as marine pollution, climate change, increasing ocean temperatures: calls therefore on the establishment of marine protected areas in the Southern (Antarctic) Ocean;

Or. en

Amendment 300 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Calls on the Commission to address threats to biodiversity posed by the legal wildlife trade through the adoption of new, preventive legislation to better regulate this trade according to strict and precautionary criteria, with the “do no harm” principle at its very core;

Or. en

Amendment 301 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Calls on the Commission to update the Adaptive management guidance in Natura 2000, which involves the consideration of potential regional impacts of climate change on species and ecosystems and the design of management

PE680.715v02-00 144/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN actions that take those impacts into account;

Or. en

Amendment 302 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Highlights that the stricter level of protection may allow for certain human activities, which are compatible with the conservation and management objectives of the protected area, such as photo tourism, bird watching, sustainable hunting and recreational fishing;

Or. en

Amendment 303 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Emphasises the importance, across the whole European territory, of different networks of environmental corridors with a green component (natural spaces, permanent plant cover) and blue component (water courses, canals, wetlands);

Or. fr

Amendment 304 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins,

AM\1225089EN.docx 145/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Stresses that the promotion of sustainable forest management in the EU has had a positive impact on forests and forest conditions and on livelihoods in rural areas, as well as on the biodiversity of forests in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 305 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Martin Hojsík, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Stresses that where conservation measures restrict the use of privately owned land or negatively affect its value, adequate compensation should be granted to the owner;

Or. en

Amendment 306 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Emphasises that any forthcoming initiatives must respect fundamental legal principles such as land and forest ownership rights;

PE680.715v02-00 146/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 307 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4b. Underscores the Overseas Countries' and Territories' need to have equal or equivalent rules;

Or. en

Amendment 308 Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Stresses that according to the latest data from the reporting period 2013-2018 of the Habitats Directive, only 10,71 % of the EU´s bogs, mires and fens are in a good shape, the rest is either in a bad (51,79 %) or poor (35,71 %) shape; highlights that the EU is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG) from drained peatlands globally, corresponding to around 5% of the official EU greenhouse gas emissions total per year; highlights the urgent need to phase out the use of peat in horticulture (vegetable gardening, plant breeding, professional as well as con- professional use) and in combustion for energy generation or heating; calls for an EU wide ban on peat extraction as soon as possible, excluding peat extraction for

AM\1225089EN.docx 147/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN certain limited use such as medical or scientific purposes; considers that restoration of peatlands is a cost-effective approach to biodiversity restoration as well as climate change mitigation and adaption and, highlights the importance of ecosystem-based solutions; calls for a European Wetland and Peatland Strategy which should provide a basis for coherent peat- and wetland management and policymaking.

Or. en

Amendment 309 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Strongly supports ‘strictly protected areas’ that, in a controlled manner, allow activities such as fishing, hunting, and tourism; is of the opinion that human beings and nature are inseparable and should be considered as allied in preserving fauna and flora in order to deliver the targets of the EU Biodiversity Strategy in 2030; underlines that especially families’ access to the nature is the very foundation to teach children about the nature and the importance of biodiversity; reminds the Commission that nature-related activities in forests and coastal areas are central elements in our shared cultural heritage and thus our ‘European Way of Life’;

Or. en

Amendment 310 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

PE680.715v02-00 148/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Notes that urban areas accounted for 22.5%of the EU’s total land area in 2014, of which cities represented 4%1a and suburbs and towns 13%, together covering one sixth of the land area, and are expected to grow; calls for a proportional share of at least one sixth of protected areas to be realised in urban areas, as this is not only crucial to contribute to the overall protection targets, but also for improving air quality, providing opportunities for recreation, and increasing overall well-being; ______1a OECD: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSet Code=BUILT_UP and Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php/Territorial_typologie s_manual_-_degree_of_urbanisation

Or. en

Amendment 311 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Underlines that in order achieve the objective of halting and reversing the loss of Europe's biodiversity the remaining 70% of Union marine and terrestrial area not protected will also need contribute by being ecologically managed; recalls that restoring nature

AM\1225089EN.docx 149/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN and ecosystems in protected areas cannot make up for continued destruction and degradation of ecosystems elsewhere; calls for the 'do no harm' as well as the precautionary principle to be fully integrated throughout EU policies;

Or. en

Amendment 312 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Recalls its resolution of 15 November 2017 on an Action Plan for nature, people, and the economy1a and reiterates its call on the Commission to develop an assessment procedure to enable the protection status of species in particular regions to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached; ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0441

Or. en

Amendment 313 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Stresses the important role of the EU in the Danube Convention; highlights the value of the Carpathian region in

PE680.715v02-00 150/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN terms of biodiversity and notes that the EU accession to the Carpathian Convention would be of relevance to support the policy development and planning of the region which holds irreplaceable natural values in continental Europe;

Or. en

Amendment 314 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Recognises that long-term public and private investments in a reinforced sustainable forest management which places equal focus on the social, environmental and economic benefits of forests can help ensure forests´ resilience and adaptive capacity, as well as achieving the transition to a circular bio- economy and the promotion of biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 315 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Stresses that according to the EEA report, existing management effectiveness standards are insufficiently known and

AM\1225089EN.docx 151/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN understood among practitioners; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States for more targeted capacity building and better EU guidance on management effectiveness;

Or. en

Amendment 316 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Stresses the need to clarify the definitions of the different elements of the strategy in consultation with Member States and stakeholders, in particular in the areas of agriculture, fisheries and forestry;

Or. it

Amendment 317 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Emphasises that many Member States have a long history of sustainable human activities in protected areas; is of the opinion that new targets for designated protected areas should reflect this fact;

Or. en

Amendment 318

PE680.715v02-00 152/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4c. Welcomes national and transnational projects of restoration of primary forests and calls on the commission to support such projects;

Or. en

Amendment 319 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4d. Strongly deplores that the Commission's draft technical note on criteria and guidance for protected areas designations defines fishing and hunting activities as ‘extractive activities’ similarly to mining activities; believes that mining activities and fishing and hunting activities cannot be compared;

Or. en

Amendment 320 Michal Wiezik

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4d. Stresses the crucial role of functional protected areas in maintaining, protecting and restoring biodiversity, and

AM\1225089EN.docx 153/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN especially so in non-intervention zones and of promoting traditional excessive management of grasslands and wood pastures;

Or. en

Amendment 321 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4d. Notes with concern the current direction of processes in the Commission to define strictly protected areas; in particular, opposes the draft proposal to define fishing and hunting activities as 'extractive activities';

Or. en

Amendment 322 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4d. Calls on the Commission to set targets for using renaturation in urban areas as an opportunity;

Or. en

Amendment 323 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 154/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 4 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4e. Underlines that awareness of the values of a diverse nature, recreational access and the use of nature are important prerequisites for public support and assistance to the promotion and success of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030; considers that recreational activities such as training, hiking, fauna watching, sustainable collection of food items, sustainable recreational fishing and hunting should be supported, also in future strictly protected areas, in a controlled manner, as part of the implementation of the strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 324 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4e. Is of the opinion that recreational activities such as hiking and sustainable recreational fishing and hunting are compatible with the protection and conservation of the environment, even in strictly protected areas; emphasises that public access to and interest in Europe's nature is an important part of a successful implementation of the Union's environmental and biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 325 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

AM\1225089EN.docx 155/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4e. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, to clarify and harmonise the definitions and terminology, concepts and statistics in use (e.g. intact forests) and to ensure the coherence of the policies and measures adopted;

Or. en

Amendment 326 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4f. Emphasises that it is important that the EU and global biodiversity strategies have the same level of ambition, especially when it comes to the level of protection; underlines that the updated zero draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, which takes into account the outcomes of the second meeting of the Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, doesn’t include a reference to strict protection; therefore, calls the Commission to ensure that any land protection target is flexible enough to allow implementation to take into account the precise conditions and opportunities of each country and rights of land and forest owners, with strict protection being a voluntary option for land and forest owners;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 156/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 327 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4g. Emphasises the importance of peatlands, which are the largest (fossil) carbon reservoirs on earth, although they occupy only 3% of the land surface; calls for species' protection and climate reasons, that the protection of peatlands and wetland habitats should be given a particularly high priority;

Or. en

Amendment 328 Ville Niinistö, Michal Wiezik

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Strongly welcomes the proposal on the EU Nature Restoration commitment for a legislative proposal on Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration legally binding restoration targets that target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and should be additional to the EU’s existing seas, which should be implemented by legislation, with targets that are effective each Member State consistently throughout and quickly enforceable through the their territory; considers that in addition to adoption of a European restoration law; an overall restoration target, ecosystem- reiterates its call for a legally binding specific targets should be set, with a restoration target of at least 30 % of the particular emphasis on ecosystems for the EU’s land and seas as well as a separate dual purposes of biodiversity restoration forest restoration target to increase and and climate change mitigation and restore connectivity between blocks of adaptation; stresses that after restoration, older and aging forests and to integrate no ecosystem degradation should be climate and biodiversity action, which allowed; should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem- specific targets should be set, with a

AM\1225089EN.docx 157/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and ecosystem-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation; calls on the Commission to consider the potential role of re-wilding and stresses that after the restoration of habitats to high quality and resilient nature, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 329 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming proposal proposal on the EU Nature Restoration on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration reiterates its call for a restoration target of target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and at least 30 % of the land and seas, which seas, which should be implemented by should be implemented by each Member each Member State consistently throughout State consistently throughout all of their their territory; considers that in addition to territory and based on thorough and an overall restoration target, ecosystem- convincing impact assessments; considers specific targets should be set, with a that in addition to an overall target for particular emphasis on ecosystems for the restoration, ecosystem-specific dual purposes of biodiversity restoration opportunities should be considered, with a and climate change mitigation and particular emphasis on ecosystems for the adaptation; stresses that after restoration, dual purposes of biodiversity restoration no ecosystem degradation should be and climate change mitigation and allowed; adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed; stresses the need to prioritise positive incentives and the voluntary participatory bottom-up process with a view to increasing acceptance, motivation and commitment to protecting and restoring biodiversity; calls, therefore, for a very careful approach to any new legally binding instruments;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 158/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 330 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Strongly welcomes the upcoming proposal on the EU Nature Restoration legislative proposal for a legally binding Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and call for a large-scale restoration target of at seas, which should be implemented by least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, each Member State consistently throughout setting them on a clear path to restoration their territory; considers that in addition to by 2030 through enforceable and effective an overall restoration target, ecosystem- targets, which should be implemented by specific targets should be set, with a each Member State consistently throughout particular emphasis on ecosystems for the their territory; highlights that new nature dual purposes of biodiversity restoration restoration legislation must be and climate change mitigation and supplementary and additional to the adaptation; stresses that after restoration, existing EU legislation, notably the EU no ecosystem degradation should be Birds and Habitats Directives, Water allowed; Framework Directive and Marine Strategy Framework Directive; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem-specific targets should be set within each Member State, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 331 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

AM\1225089EN.docx 159/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming proposal proposal on the EU Nature Restoration on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration reiterates its call for an EU-wide target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land restoration target of degraded ecosystems, and seas, which should be implemented by while taking into account the different each Member State consistently throughout characteristics of each Member State, their territory; considers that in addition to such as its size and the percentage of its an overall restoration target, ecosystem- territory comprising natural areas, which specific targets should be set, with a should be implemented by each Member particular emphasis on ecosystems for the State consistently throughout their dual purposes of biodiversity restoration territory; considers that in addition to an and climate change mitigation and overall restoration objective, other carbon- adaptation; stresses that after restoration, rich ecosystem specific opportunities for no ecosystem degradation should be restauration could be considered, with a allowed; particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses the need to prioritise positive incentives and voluntary bottom- up participatory process in order to increase the acceptance, motivation and commitment to biodiversity protection and restoration, and thus, calls for a careful approach towards any new legally binding instruments;

Or. en

Amendment 332 Nils Torvalds, Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a Plan, which should be implemented by restoration target of at least 30 % of the each Member State throughout their EU’s land and seas, which should be territory; implemented by each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem-specific

PE680.715v02-00 160/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 333 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, seas, which should be implemented by which should be implemented by each each Member State consistently throughout Member State consistently throughout their their territory; considers that in addition to territory; considers that in addition to an an overall restoration target, ecosystem- overall restoration target, ecosystem- specific targets should be set, with a specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be no ecosystem degradation should be allowed; allowed; strongly believes that innovation is a key part of the solution to tackle the decline in biodiversity; calls for an enabling regulatory environment and incentives to facilitate market access and uptake of innovative technologies;

Or. en

Amendment 334 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

AM\1225089EN.docx 161/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory inside and outside of the an overall restoration target, ecosystem- already protected areas; considers that in specific targets should be set, with a addition to an overall restoration target, particular emphasis on ecosystems for the ecosystem-specific targets should be set, dual purposes of biodiversity restoration with a particular emphasis on ecosystems and climate change mitigation and for the dual purposes of biodiversity adaptation; stresses that after restoration, restoration and climate change mitigation no ecosystem degradation should be and adaptation to prevent and reduce the allowed; impact of natural disasters; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed; believes that progress in this regard must be assessed regularly at both Member States’ and EU level;

Or. en

Amendment 335 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem- an overall restoration target, ecosystem- specific targets should be set, with a specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the particular emphasis on carbon-rich dual purposes of biodiversity restoration ecosystems and biodiversity targets should

PE680.715v02-00 162/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN and climate change mitigation and be set accounting for already established adaptation; stresses that after restoration, shifts in ecosystems due to for example no ecosystem degradation should be climate change and anthropogenic effects; allowed; stresses that recognising climate change impacts is paramount for setting targets to ensure appropriate and realistic biodiversity targets in the long run and ensure no further ecosystem degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 336 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming proposal proposal on the EU Nature Restoration on the EU Nature Restoration Plan, which Plan and reiterates its call for a should be based on scientific restoration target of at least 30 % of the assessments; considers that in addition to EU’s land and seas, which should be an overall restoration target, targets should implemented by each Member State be set for ecosystems, with a particular consistently throughout their territory; emphasis on ecosystems for the dual considers that in addition to an overall purposes of biodiversity restoration and restoration target, ecosystem-specific climate change mitigation and adaptation; targets should be set, with a particular stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem emphasis on ecosystems for the dual degradation should be allowed; purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. it

Amendment 337 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 163/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming proposal proposal on the EU Nature Restoration on the EU Nature Restoration Plan, which Plan and reiterates its call for a should be based on scientific assessments; restoration target of at least 30 % of the considers that in addition to an overall EU’s land and seas, which should be restoration target, targets should be set for implemented by each Member State ecosystems, with a particular emphasis on consistently throughout their territory; ecosystems for the dual purposes of considers that in addition to an overall biodiversity restoration and climate change restoration target, ecosystem-specific mitigation and adaptation; stresses that targets should be set, with a particular after restoration, no ecosystem degradation emphasis on ecosystems for the dual should be allowed; purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. it

Amendment 338 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming proposal proposal on the EU Nature Restoration on the EU Nature Restoration Plan, which Plan and reiterates its call for a should be based on scientific assessments; restoration target of at least 30 % of the considers that in addition to an overall EU’s land and seas, which should be restoration target, ecosystem-specific implemented by each Member State targets should be set, with a particular consistently throughout their territory; emphasis on ecosystems for the dual considers that in addition to an overall purposes of biodiversity restoration and restoration target, ecosystem-specific climate change mitigation and adaptation; targets should be set, with a particular stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem emphasis on ecosystems for the dual degradation should be allowed; purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 164/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 339 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Takes note of the upcoming proposal on the EU Nature Restoration legislative proposal on the EU Nature Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Restoration Plan for a restoration target of target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, seas, which should be implemented by which should be implemented Union-wide; each Member State consistently considers that particular emphasis should throughout their territory; considers that be put on the dual purposes of biodiversity in addition to an overall restoration restoration and climate change mitigation target, ecosystem-specific targets should and adaptation; stresses that after be set, with a particular emphasis on restoration, no ecosystem degradation ecosystems for the dual purposes of should be allowed; biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 340 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Strongly welcomes the upcoming proposal on the EU Nature Restoration legislative proposal on the EU Nature Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and restoration target of at least 30 % of the seas, which should be implemented by EU’s land and seas, which should be each Member State consistently throughout implemented by each Member State their territory; considers that in addition to consistently throughout their territory; an overall restoration target, ecosystem- considers that in addition to an overall specific targets should be set, with a restoration target, ecosystem-specific particular emphasis on ecosystems for the targets should be set, with a particular dual purposes of biodiversity restoration emphasis on implementing nature-based and climate change mitigation and solutions for climate change mitigation adaptation; stresses that after restoration, and adaptation including restoring

AM\1225089EN.docx 165/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN no ecosystem degradation should be habitats that can capture and store carbon allowed; and restoring coastal ecosystems to reduce the impact of natural disasters; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 341 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory, and through transnational an overall restoration target, ecosystem- cooperation where protected areas specific targets should be set, with a straddle the territories of several particular emphasis on ecosystems for the countries; considers that in addition to an dual purposes of biodiversity restoration overall restoration target, ecosystem- and climate change mitigation and specific targets should be set, with a adaptation; stresses that after restoration, particular emphasis on ecosystems for the no ecosystem degradation should be dual purposes of biodiversity restoration allowed; and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. ro

Amendment 342 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

PE680.715v02-00 166/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory in line with site-specific an overall restoration target, ecosystem- conservation objectives; considers that in specific targets should be set, with a addition to an overall restoration target, particular emphasis on ecosystems for the ecosystem-specific targets should be set, dual purposes of biodiversity restoration with a particular emphasis on old-growth and climate change mitigation and forest and other carbon-rich ecosystems adaptation; stresses that after restoration, for the dual purposes of biodiversity no ecosystem degradation should be restoration and climate change mitigation allowed; and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 343 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and notes its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory taking into account different an overall restoration target, ecosystem- ownership and land-uses systems; specific targets should be set, with a considers that in addition to an overall particular emphasis on ecosystems for the restoration target, ecosystem-specific dual purposes of biodiversity restoration targets could be considered, with a and climate change mitigation and particular emphasis on ecosystems for the adaptation; stresses that after restoration, dual purposes of biodiversity restoration no ecosystem degradation should be and climate change mitigation and allowed; adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

AM\1225089EN.docx 167/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 344 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem- an overall restoration target, ecosystem- specific targets should be set, with a specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, adaptation to prevent and reduce the no ecosystem degradation should be impact of natural disasters; stresses that allowed; after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 345 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem- an overall restoration target, ecosystem-

PE680.715v02-00 168/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN specific targets should be set, with a specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the particular emphasis on ecosystems for the dual purposes of biodiversity restoration dual purposes of biodiversity restoration and climate change mitigation and and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, adaptation through the use of nature- no ecosystem degradation should be based solutions; stresses that after allowed; restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 346 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Strongly welcomes the upcoming proposal on the EU Nature Restoration legislative proposal on the EU Nature Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and restoration target of at least 30 % of the seas, which should be implemented by EU’s land and seas, which should be each Member State consistently throughout implemented by each Member State their territory; considers that in addition to consistently throughout their territory; an overall restoration target, ecosystem- considers that in addition to an overall specific targets should be set, with a restoration target, ecosystem-specific particular emphasis on ecosystems for the targets should be set, with a particular dual purposes of biodiversity restoration emphasis on ecosystems for the dual and climate change mitigation and purposes of biodiversity restoration and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, nature-based solutions for climate change no ecosystem degradation should be mitigation and adaptation; stresses that allowed; after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 347 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

AM\1225089EN.docx 169/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory on the basis of biodiversity an overall restoration target, ecosystem- needs; considers that in addition to an specific targets should be set, with a overall restoration target, ecosystem- particular emphasis on ecosystems for the specific targets should be set, with a dual purposes of biodiversity restoration particular emphasis on ecosystems for the and climate change mitigation and dual purposes of biodiversity restoration adaptation; stresses that after restoration, and climate change mitigation and no ecosystem degradation should be adaptation; stresses that after restoration, allowed; no ecosystem degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 348 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Takes a neutral view of the proposal on the EU Nature Restoration upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and call for a general restoration target of at seas, which should be implemented by least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, each Member State consistently taking into account the three pillars of throughout their territory; considers that sustainability, the special conditions in in addition to an overall restoration target, the Member States and their sovereign ecosystem-specific targets should be set, competence in the matter of forestry with a particular emphasis on ecosystems policy; considers that in addition to an for the dual purposes of biodiversity overall restoration target, ecosystem- restoration and climate change mitigation specific targets should be set, with a and adaptation; stresses that after particular emphasis on ecosystems for the restoration, no ecosystem degradation dual purposes of biodiversity restoration should be allowed; and climate change mitigation and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem degradation should be

PE680.715v02-00 170/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN allowed;

Or. fi

Amendment 349 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and seas, which should be implemented by seas, which should be implemented by each Member State consistently throughout each Member State consistently throughout their territory; considers that in addition to their territory; considers that in addition to an overall restoration target, ecosystem- an overall restoration target, ecosystem- specific targets should be set, with a specific targets should be set, with a particular emphasis on ecosystems for the particular emphasis on promoting natural dual purposes of biodiversity restoration processes for the dual purposes of and climate change mitigation and biodiversity restoration and climate change adaptation; stresses that after restoration, mitigation and adaptation; stresses that no ecosystem degradation should be after restoration, no ecosystem degradation allowed; should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 350 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a legally- target of at least 30 % of the EU’s land and binding restoration target of at least 30 % seas, which should be implemented by of the EU’s land and seas, which should be each Member State consistently throughout implemented by each Member State their territory; considers that in addition to consistently throughout their territory;

AM\1225089EN.docx 171/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN an overall restoration target, ecosystem- considers that in addition to an overall specific targets should be set, with a restoration target, ecosystem-specific particular emphasis on ecosystems for the targets should be set, with a particular dual purposes of biodiversity restoration emphasis on ecosystems for the dual and climate change mitigation and purposes of biodiversity restoration and adaptation; stresses that after restoration, climate change mitigation and adaptation; no ecosystem degradation should be stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem allowed; degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 351 Esther de Lange, Jan Huitema

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative 5. Welcomes the upcoming legislative proposal on the EU Nature Restoration proposal on the EU Nature Restoration Plan and reiterates its call for a Plan, subject to an impact assessment restoration target of at least 30 % of the leading to a favourable conservation EU’s land and seas, which should be status or at least a positive trend of 30% implemented by each Member State for natural habitats and species; considers consistently throughout their territory; that in addition to an overall restoration considers that in addition to an overall target, ecosystem-specific objectives may restoration target, ecosystem-specific be set, with a particular emphasis on targets should be set, with a particular ecosystems for the dual purposes of emphasis on ecosystems for the dual biodiversity restoration and climate change purposes of biodiversity restoration and mitigation and adaptation; stresses that climate change mitigation and adaptation; after restoration, no ecosystem degradation stresses that after restoration, no ecosystem should be allowed; degradation should be allowed;

Or. en

Amendment 352 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 172/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 5a. Stresses that, according to a study published in Global Change Biology, 1 200 ‘green infrastructure projects’ have been built in sensitive or protected areas of Western Europe and they have a direct impact on flora and fauna and on protected ecosystems as a whole; emphasises that, in addition to the installation of an exponential number of infrastructure projects such as wind turbines in sensitive or protected areas, the unbridled race to establish infrastructure for these installations must be halted as it is directly or indirectly affecting these protected areas, creating irreversible imbalances; believes that an impact study must be carried out for any new facilities in sensitive or protected areas from the moment they are installed, taking into consideration harm occurring throughout their entire life cycle from pre-project stage through to end-of-life destruction and the return to environmental standards in the area;

Or. fr

Amendment 353 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Welcomes the restoration target of 25 000 km of free-flowing rivers through the removal of barriers and the restoration of floodplains; underlines that the work and planning should be coordinated at the river basin level for a multiplier and highest possible effect and to prevent dead ends; notes that while on the longest European river the Danube there is openness to refurbish both a stage around Iron Gate and barriers in Austria, Slovakia has so far not made any

AM\1225089EN.docx 173/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN indication to eliminate the barrier caused by Gabčíkovo power plant; stresses that in case of non-action, the effect of restoration will be limited and any action on Austrian side would, e.g. regarding sturgeons, be rendered meaningless;

Or. en

Amendment 354 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Notes that, as stated in the state of nature in the European Union Report on the status and trends in 2013 -2018 of species and habitat types protected by the Birds and Habitats Directives, in spite of Member States’ measures, conservation status and trends did not improve over the reporting period; in fact, for many species and habitat types, including those for which Natura 2000 designation is a key conservation delivery mechanism, they deteriorated further; notes that some Member States failed to take the necessary conservation measures, or at least to the extent required, and in some cases even to adequately identify them;

Or. en

Amendment 355 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 174/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Emphasises that blue carbon which represents the carbon stored in marine and coastal ecosystems such as mangroves, salt marshes and seagrasses, offers a wide range of mitigation and adaptation benefits; underlines that when degraded or destroyed, these ecosystems emit into the atmosphere and the ocean the carbon they have stored for centuries and become sources of greenhouse gas emissions, calls therefore for the reinforced protection and restoration of these ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 356 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Calls on the Commission to include in the legislative proposal on nature restoration a framework setting out intermediate nature restoration targets on the road to restoration by 2030 at Member State level; believes that this framework should include a mechanism obliging the Commission and the Member States to present plans for stepping up action if assessment shows that the current trajectory is insufficient for the EU to meet its goals;

Or. en

Amendment 357 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula

AM\1225089EN.docx 175/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Welcomes the upcoming Action plan to conserve fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems; believes it necessary to take measures to limit the use of the fishing gears most harmful to biodiversity, including bottom trawling restrictions in coastal areas, to rapidly phase out all harmful fisheries subsidies, and to scale up the fight against sea-based sources of plastic pollution including mitigation measures;

Or. en

Amendment 358 Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Łukasz Kohut, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Takes note of the conclusions of the “Fitness Check of the Birds and Habitats Directives” published by the Commission in 2017; however, refers to recent studies of scientists and experts which show that over the last 25 years birds have suffered from significant declines and show no sign of recovery; in light of this, calls on the Commission to update and enlarge the Directives’ Annexes without undue delay;

Or. en

Amendment 359 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Michal Wiezik,

PE680.715v02-00 176/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Believes that the new legislative instrument for nature restoration should be additional and complementary to the existing EU legislation focused on the restoration and should cover at least the restoration of ecosystems including forests, peatlands, floodplains, free- flowing rivers, wetlands, biodiversity-rich grasslands, coastal areas and marine ecosystems such as seagrass meadows or biogenic reefs;

Or. en

Amendment 360 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Stresses the importance of consistency between the policy of preserving and safeguarding protected areas and other Community policies, particularly economic policies; calls, therefore, for a gradual approach, with consistent and realistic performance indicators and measures that favour the adoption of incentives aimed at guiding businesses, instead of a purely prescriptive and punitive approach;

Or. it

Amendment 361 Stanislav Polčák

AM\1225089EN.docx 177/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Notes, too, that there are risks to biodiversity from the growing fragmentation of habitats and emphasises the need to create ecological corridors that prevent genetic isolation, enable species migration and promote healthy ecosystems; calls in this context for the construction of green and blue infrastructure and cross-border cooperation between Member States;

Or. cs

Amendment 362 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Strongly highlights the importance of fully integrating the nature restoration objectives into other related policies and strategies, including on forests, soils and climate change; supports also the inclusion of the objective of restoring 25000 km of rivers into free-flowing rivers within the Restoration Plan;

Or. en

Amendment 363 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 178/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Stresses the need for a mosaic masterplan to protect biodiversity and healthy ecosystems from global to local level, entailing the concept of leaving 1/3 of all green areas at local, regional and EU levels in their natural state, to complement the Natura 2000 network;

Or. en

Amendment 364 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Calls on the Commission to offer support in the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy, for changing farming practices, especially for rewetting peatlands and restoring high diversity grasslands, and avoid operating against its restoration objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 365 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Highlights that specific national conditions as well as measures already in place in the individual Member States have to be taken into account with regard to the accomplishment of the EU-level

AM\1225089EN.docx 179/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN targets mentioned in the Strategy in terrestrial and marine areas;

Or. en

Amendment 366 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Stresses that Mediterranean and insular ecosystems are the most vulnerable to climate change impacts and biodiversity loss; urges the Commission to prioritise actions and recommendations for the protection of nature in these areas;

Or. en

Amendment 367 Ville Niinistö, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Expresses concerns that genetically engineered organisms might, for different reasons, be released into the environment, and continue to persist and propagate within wild species without sufficient spatio-temporal control;

Or. en

Amendment 368 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

PE680.715v02-00 180/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Calls on the Member States to safeguard the genetic diversity of wild species through in situ and ex situ conservation measures and to apply these measures in an integrated manner, following the One Plan Approach;

Or. en

Amendment 369 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Strongly supports the proposed actions and commitments under the EU Nature Restoration Plan and calls upon the Member States for a thorough and swift implementation thereof;

Or. en

Amendment 370 Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Highlights the potential of “temporary nature” for additional biodiversity gains; calls on the Commission to assess its potential and avenues to foster its application.

AM\1225089EN.docx 181/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 371 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Stresses the importance of national efforts to protect and restore freshwater ecosystems and the natural flow of rivers;

Or. en

Amendment 372 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Welcomes the commitments to ensure no deterioration in conservation trends and status of all protected habitats and species by 2030 and to ensure that on Member States level at least 30 % of species and habitats not currently in favourable status are in that category or show a strong positive trend; calls on the Member States to adopt national Restoration Plans offering supporting measures and activities to deliver environmental recovery on both national and EU level; considers it essential to foresee clear measurable time-bound targets, to publish the plans and their assessments in due time and to ensure their reinforcement with other sectoral policies, their planning and financial instruments;

PE680.715v02-00 182/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 373 Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Considers that while peatlands can store twice as much carbon as all the world's forests, covering only 3% of the world’s land area yet holding nearly 30% of the soil carbon and are a home to fragile biodiversity that cannot exist elsewhere, damaged peatlands are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions; calls therefore for an urgent introduction of legally binding targets for restoration of bogs, mires and wetlands in the EU as foreseen in the EU Biodiversity Strategy, implemented at Member State level; highlights that wetlands are essential ecosystems that provide many services, for people, the planet and the climate—including their vital role as a natural carbon sink;

Or. en

Amendment 374 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Considers that there are major deficiencies in all EU Member States and at all levels of the law enforcement chain that prevent criminal environmental law from being effective, such as the lack of

AM\1225089EN.docx 183/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN prioritisation of environmental crimes, lack of human and financial resources for law enforcement authorities, and low level of sanctions imposed in practice; calls for wildlife and forest crimes to be treated as serious crimes, both within the EU through the revision of the Environmental Crime Directive and through development assistance programmes, and in line with the objectives and definitions of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC);

Or. en

Amendment 375 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Stresses the importance of protected area governance and cooperation that engages landowners, fishermen, users and local stakeholders for the successful implementation of the Strategy at all levels; believes that Member States should carefully evaluate compensation measures, when the financial income and ownership rights are being compromised, as a result of additional designation of protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 376 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

PE680.715v02-00 184/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Recalls that light pollution is increasing in the European Union today; emphasises that the Milky Way is no longer visible to 60 % of Europeans, in summer or winter;

Or. fr

Amendment 377 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Stresses that the protection targets and associated measures should take into account the precise conditions and opportunities of each country;

Or. en

Amendment 378 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Underlines the great role played by whales in carbon sequestration, and calls for their enhanced protection;

Or. en

Amendment 379 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik,

AM\1225089EN.docx 185/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5b. Believes that the 30% conservation improvement target should be set on national level for all species and habitats reported under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive; calls on the Commission to set a clear baseline, to ensure harmonized and regular reporting, and work away shortcomings in the current methodology for trend estimates;

Or. en

Amendment 380 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5c. Stresses the need for cooperation with all users at all stages and appropriate compensation for restrictions in protected and strictly protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 381 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to refrain from supporting

PE680.715v02-00 186/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN activities, which lead to significant pressure on ecosystems, including hydromorphological pressures on water or are significantly altering the forests, in protected areas and which are at increased risk of doing harm to the environment and biodiversity-rich areas;

Or. en

Amendment 382 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5c. Recalls that artificial light is increasing by around 2 % each year globally;

Or. fr

Amendment 383 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5d. Recalls that light pollution has a direct impact on land, air and marine diversity, and particularly on insects, as demonstrated in the study ‘Light pollution is a driver of insect declines’;

Or. fr

Amendment 384 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

AM\1225089EN.docx 187/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5d. Underlines that the network of well-managed protected areas should be based on the Natura2000 network and should be complemented by additional protected areas designations by Member States on the basis binding legal requirements; stresses that the verification of the targets is only possible if the underlying data is comparable;

Or. en

Amendment 385 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5d. Strongly regrets the alarming decline of pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment and provide crucial ecosystem services; calls on the Commission and Member States to address all requests expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative without further delays; calls for an urgent revision of the Initiative and development of a new EU strategy for pollinator protection with sufficient resources devoted to this end; believes that the new cross-sectoral strategy must entail a new EU-wide Pollinator Monitoring Framework with robust schemes deployed on Member States level, interim milestones, clear time-bound objectives, indicators and targets, including new legal pollinator restoration target and impact indicator1a, and necessary capacity building;

PE680.715v02-00 188/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN ______1a As per the commitment made in the EU Pollinators Initiative: Action 5C https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/c onservation/species/pollinators/documents /EU_pollinators_initiative.pdf

Or. en

Amendment 386 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5e. Calls for the development of definitions and criteria for the designation of “protected areas” as well as “strictly protected areas”; highlights in this respect that in protected areas sustainable agriculture and forestry could be performed and in areas with a stricter level of protection certain human activities may be allowed, which are essential to maintain cultural landscapes and which stand in line with the conservation objectives of the protected area;

Or. en

Amendment 387 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5e. Expresses its concern that the Commission has no plans to propose that Member States recognise a right to darkness or to establish a network of Dark

AM\1225089EN.docx 189/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Sky Reserves or a European action plan on light pollution;

Or. fr

Amendment 388 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5f. Expresses its concern at the inappropriate use of lighting, which can cause disturbance to protected species, including in areas protected by the Natura 2000 network;

Or. fr

Amendment 389 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5f. Highlights the success of the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive as effective instruments for the conservation of biodiversity; stresses the need for more flexibility in protection measures to effectively protect humans and livestock if predators pose a danger or if birds cause significant impairment, and allow for changes in conservation status;

Or. en

Amendment 390

PE680.715v02-00 190/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Recalls that the illegal killing of birds and particularly of migratory species in the Mediterranean, as well as of birds of prey in some Member States, remains a cause for concern; stresses the need for a plan coordinated at European level, on the basis of scientific data, to improve the protection of migratory bird species passing through more than one Member State;

Or. en

Amendment 391 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; invasive species, including alien, introduced, naturalised or any type of non-native species; notes that it is essential for the protection and restoration of native biodiversity to ensure the balance of animal species, particularly those that are now overabundant as a result of strict protection in past decades, leading to excellent reproduction and exponential increases of individuals, but today posing problems of damage to fish stocks, crops, livestock farms, as well as safety problems affecting the mobility of persons; underlines, too, that invasive

AM\1225089EN.docx 191/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN species pose a danger to, and are detrimental to, native species that are often less resilient and more fragile; notes that proper control of overabundance of animal species can be achieved through ethical and sustainable hunting, including within protected areas, as a useful instrument for control and balance instrument, helping to prevent one species from competing with or prevailing over another, especially invasive alien species in relation to native species;

Or. it

Amendment 392 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; invasive species, including alien, introduced, naturalised or any type of non-native species; notes that it is essential for the protection and restoration of native biodiversity to ensure the balance of animal species, particularly those that are now overabundant as a result of strict protection in past decades, leading to excellent reproduction and exponential increases of individuals, but today posing problems of damage to fish stocks, crops, livestock farms, as well as safety problems affecting the mobility of persons; underlines, too, that invasive species pose a danger to, and are detrimental to, native species that are often less resilient and more fragile;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 192/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 393 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; and invasive alien species; stresses that climate change has been assessed globally, with differences emerging between regions, and that its impact on nature is already being felt by ecosystems and by the genetic base of their component species; notes that this impact is expected to increase over the coming decades, in some cases outweighing the impact of changes in the use of the land and sea and other factors; emphasises that acting early in these areas is a priority;

Or. it

Amendment 394 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; and invasive alien species; calls for the balance between wild and domestic species to be guaranteed, thereby

AM\1225089EN.docx 193/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ensuring decent living conditions for farmers, fishermen and their families, while protecting their businesses from economic damage and safeguarding biodiversity, of which human beings and their activities are a part;

Or. it

Amendment 395 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; and invasive alien species; calls for the balance between wild and domestic species to be guaranteed, thereby ensuring decent living conditions for farmers, fishermen and their families, while protecting their businesses from economic damage and safeguarding biodiversity, of which human beings and their activities are a part;

Or. it

Amendment 396 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle

PE680.715v02-00 194/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature in the European Union: climate exploitation of organisms; climate change; change and invasive alien species; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; changes in land and sea use and direct exploitation of organisms; notes that these five drivers stem from a combination of current production and consumption patterns, population dynamics, trade, technological innovations and governance models;1a ______1a IPBES (2020), The global assessment report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Or. en

Amendment 397 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct nature: changes in land and sea use; direct exploitation of organisms; climate change; exploitation of organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species; pollution; and invasive alien species; recognises the detrimental impacts of industrial animal farming on biodiversity, the environment, climate, animal welfare and human health;

Or. en

Amendment 398 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

AM\1225089EN.docx 195/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of change in nature: changes in land and sea use; direct our relationship with nature: changes in exploitation of organisms; climate change; land and sea use; direct exploitation of pollution; and invasive alien species; organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species;

Or. en

Amendment 399 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Underlines that the Biodiversity 6. Underlines that the Biodiversity Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle Strategy’s actions must adequately tackle all five main direct drivers of change in all five main direct drivers of biodiversity nature: changes in land and sea use; direct loss and ecosystem change: changes in exploitation of organisms; climate change; land and sea use; direct exploitation of pollution; and invasive alien species; organisms; climate change; pollution; and invasive alien species;

Or. en

Amendment 400 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Recalls that the main causes of environmental destruction leading to biodiversity loss include habitat destruction and fragmentation, climate change and the introduction of invasive

PE680.715v02-00 196/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN alien species, which form an integral part of the dominant economic model and its underlying policies rooted in the concentration of production for the sake of profit at any cost; notes that the environmental crisis is not a crisis of nature, but a crisis of society that becomes worse whenever other crises worsen or increase, and that the core policies cannot continue to be unfettered use of natural resources and increased production to cope with economic and financial losses; points out that inconsistencies in EU common policies, which promote intensive export-oriented production models, deregulation and free trade, and the weakening of local production and consumption, and which have not changed at their core or in their market orientation, undermine any claims to protect biodiversity, which suggests that the issue is not economic growth, but its underlying objective;

Or. pt

Amendment 401 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Stresses that economic activities directly affecting and exploiting ecosystems and their biodiversity shall incorporate all the possible safeguards to mitigate the negative impact on these ecosystems; notes that the fact that both the value of biodiversity lost and value of carbon released from the ecosystems leads to choices and positive accounts even in cases where significant natural values are being lost; underlines that in particular exploitation of forest ecosystems whether

AM\1225089EN.docx 197/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN for products or bioenergy use should be based on measurable indicators and robust sustainability criteria; highlights that currently that is not the case and practically any management and use is simply declared and treated as sustainable without this claim having been credibly earned;

Or. en

Amendment 402 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Calls on Member States to address those direct drivers in their CAP Strategic Plans, and asks the Commission to assess them on the basis of the relevant quantified objective of the Biodiversity Strategy as voted by the European parliament on October 23, 2020; in addition, calls on the Commission, once national Strategic Plans are approved, to carry out an independent assessment of their aggregated expected impact; considers that, in case this analysis reveals an insufficient joint effort in relation to the ambition of the European Green Deal, the Commission should take appropriate action, such as requesting Member States to modify their CAP strategic plans or tabling amendments to the CAP Strategic Plan regulation as voted by the European parliament on October 23, 2020;

Or. en

Amendment 403 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-

PE680.715v02-00 198/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Notes that illegal logging is a driver of the loss of biodiversity in the EU; stresses the need for the EU to do more to stop illegal logging practices; urges the Commission to take urgent action through close monitoring of measures taken by the Member States and through the enforcement of existing EU laws; calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures when breaches occur as well as to follow through on illegal logging cases through organisms such as the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF);

Or. en

Amendment 404 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Andreas Glück, Martin Hojsík, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Highlights the importance of taking a shared responsibility approach including all relevant sectors on tackling the main direct anthropogenic drivers that duly takes into account all relevant activities such as the significantly increasing land sealing in urban areas; stresses that focussing on agriculture and forestry alone would fall short of addressing the causes appropriately; underlines the importance of taking into account specific local circumstances and to include all relevant local stakeholders

AM\1225089EN.docx 199/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN in decision making processes;

Or. en

Amendment 405 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Considers that animal agriculture is one of the key drivers of land-use change worldwide, directly leading to biodiversity loss and climate change and that current European consumption patterns are therefore unsustainable; underlines the need for the further development within the EU of plant protein production and alternative sources of protein for feed and food to address such challenges;

Or. en

Amendment 406 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Welcomes that the mandate of the European Parliament on the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) makes the protection and enhancement of biodiversity a cornerstone by enshrining the improvement of biodiversity principles in its conditionality criteria and supporting agricultural practices that contribute to the protection of biodiversity in the ecoschemes and national climate plans;

PE680.715v02-00 200/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 407 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Stresses the need for the active involvement of all stakeholders at European, national, regional and local level so that they can take concrete action to effectively implement the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and to address any implementation gaps in the Habitats and Birds Directives;

Or. it

Amendment 408 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Stresses that free trade agreements have a direct impact on the degradation of European and global ecosystems due to an increased carbon footprint and to over- exploitation of the natural resources of the poorest countries, which seriously affect biodiversity;

Or. fr

Amendment 409 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

AM\1225089EN.docx 201/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Reiterates that the Common Agricultural Policy should be fully in line with the EU’s increased climate and biodiversity ambitions, and should take into account the objective of reducing the Union’s global footprint, including reducing unsustainable land use and ending land-grabbing in third countries;

Or. en

Amendment 410 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Stresses that in order for the Biodiversity Strategy 2030 to be successful it is of paramount importance to also tackle the indirect drivers underpinning the direct drivers, particularly the unsustainable production and consumption patterns at their root;

Or. en

Amendment 411 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Recalls that one of the main

PE680.715v02-00 202/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN threats to biodiversity is the gradual abandonment of agricultural and livestock activities as a result of urban pressures, the rural exodus and low profitability;

Or. es

Amendment 412 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Stresses that the Biodiversity Strategy has to adopt a global perspective and take into account the Union's external responsibility and the extra- territorial dimension of biodiversity loss;

Or. en

Amendment 413 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6b. Stresses that it is imperative that legality of production based on exploitation of ecosystems is properly enforced, that illegal practices are adequately and dissuasively sanctioned and liability, including if applicable criminal liability, established; highlights the recent case of the largest sanction ever received for forest operators for cartel behaviour1a, aiming to artificially lower the wood price from Romanian forests; notes that the real cost of values lost could

AM\1225089EN.docx 203/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN be hundreds of millions of euros / year caused by the illegal activity; ______1a fine of 25 mil EUR as reported, e.g. https://newsbeezer.com/romaniaeng/fines- of-25-million-euros-for-the-wood- industry-schweighofer-kronospan-and- egger-eggers- reaction/?fbclid=IwAR2ifUkF5WEaBvEe FbFvuq16RWHOdsFUg1MDMHdxUCge PXrTdqTa4czOPP0

Or. en

Amendment 414 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6b. Recalls that only a policy that defends localism will enable environmental preservation, through a smaller environmental footprint from movements of people and goods;

Or. fr

Amendment 415 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6b. Calls on the Commission to step up efforts to promote healthy, sustainable plant-based diets among EU citizens;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 204/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 416 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6c. Stresses that a Common Agricultural Policy that is not in line with the climate and biodiversity goals, the European Green Deal and the Farm to Fork strategy, and the Sustainable Development Goals is unacceptable; urges the co-legislators to review their stance on this crucial file and to align the funds, policies and legislation with the targets, goals and ambitions needed to ensure a sustainable food policy;

Or. en

Amendment 417 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Subheading 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Changes in land and sea use Changes in land, subsoil and sea use

Or. fr

Amendment 418 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Subheading 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Welcomes that the mandate of the European Parliament on the future

AM\1225089EN.docx 205/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) makes the protection and enhancement of biodiversity a cornerstone by enshrining the improvement of biodiversity principles in its conditionality criteria and supporting agricultural practices that contribute to the protection of biodiversity in the ecoschemes and national climate plans;

Or. en

Amendment 419 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; recognises the key role that submit a legislative proposal for the agriculture already plays in soil carbon establishment of a common framework for sequestration; calls on the Commission to the protection and sustainable use of soil submit a legislative proposal for the that includes a specific decontamination establishment of a common framework for target; the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination target; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal that includes adequate financial resources to compensate farmers for any increased costs or loss of income they incur in pursuing the decontamination target and to ensure greater ambition in relation to carbon sequestration and the use of biodegradable products in the soil;

Or. it

Amendment 420 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

PE680.715v02-00 206/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes and notes with concern the increased soil crucial to meet climate and biodiversity degradation and the lack of specific EU goals under the European Green Deal; legislation; calls on the Commission to notes with concern the increased soil submit a legislative proposal for the degradation and the lack of specific EU establishment of a common framework for legislation ;calls on the Commission to the protection and sustainable use of soil explore the usefulness of a common that includes a specific decontamination framework for the protection and target; sustainable use of soil with regard to practicability, proportionality, costs, administrative burden and subsidiarity and to report back to the European Parliament and the Council; stresses the need to prioritise positive incentives and voluntary bottom-up participatory process in order to increase the acceptance, motivation and commitment of biodiversity protection;

Or. en

Amendment 421 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination and for the integration of soil protection target; in all relevant EU policies; stresses that this common framework should include a

AM\1225089EN.docx 207/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN specific decontamination target, tackle diffuse pollution from all sources including microplastics, and should support the research to bridge the knowledge gaps that remain about the real potential of soil biodiversity in tackling soil pollution problems;

Or. en

Amendment 422 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination that includes specific decontamination target; targets for all relevant contaminants, including PFAS, stresses that authorisation procedures, both on EU and on Member State level, should take soil contamination and pollution accumulation comprehensively into account; regrets the negative impact of intensive animal farming on soil and water pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 423 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

PE680.715v02-00 208/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination that conceptualises soil and major threats, target; including loss of soil’s biodiversity, sets out objectives, indicators, measurable targets and timeline in order to preserve soil functions and tackle all main soil threats, establishes a legal obligation to act and take precautions to prevent or minimise adverse effects;

Or. en

Amendment 424 Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination that includes a specific decontamination target; target; invites the Commission to review Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (IED) and Directive 2006/21/EC on the management of waste from extractive industries in order to better take into account soil degradation by industrial and mining activities;

AM\1225089EN.docx 209/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 425 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; acknowledges that there are submit a legislative proposal for the provisions in legislation on agriculture, establishment of a common framework for industry and water that are indirectly the protection and sustainable use of soil contributing to its protection, but that includes a specific decontamination considers that this has resulted in a highly target; fragmented soil governance in the EU; therefore, calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination target;

Or. en

Amendment 426 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased spoil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation as a basic and irreplaceable legislation; calls on the Commission to natural resource and the lack of specific submit a legislative proposal for the EU legislation to protect it; calls on the establishment of a common framework for Commission to submit a legislative the protection and sustainable use of soil proposal for the establishment of a

PE680.715v02-00 210/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN that includes a specific decontamination common framework for the protection and target; sustainable use of soil that includes specific objectives to protect soil against deterioration in quality and occupation for purposes without vegetation and to restore contaminated or otherwise degraded soil;

Or. cs

Amendment 427 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation, soil sealing and the decline in legislation; calls on the Commission to European agricultural area and therefore submit a legislative proposal for the calls on the Commission to establish a establishment of a common framework for common framework for the protection, the protection and sustainable use of soil conservation and restoration of soil that includes a specific decontamination quality; recalls the need to provide for target; specific indicators and an EU-wide comparable measuring system; highlights that soil fertility and soil structure are crucial to promote high-quality standards in the European agricultural food sector;

Or. en

Amendment 428 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes;

AM\1225089EN.docx 211/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern soil degradation and the degradation and the lack of specific EU lack of specific EU legislation; recognises legislation; calls on the Commission to the positive role that agriculture and submit a legislative proposal for the forestry can play through good practices establishment of a common framework for in managing and safeguarding the protection and sustainable use of soil biodiversity; calls on the Commission to that includes a specific decontamination submit a proposal for the establishment of target; a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil based on scientific data and economic, environmental and social impact assessments;

Or. it

Amendment 429 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern soil degradation and the degradation and the lack of specific EU lack of specific EU legislation; recognises legislation; calls on the Commission to the positive role that agriculture and submit a legislative proposal for the forestry can play through good practices establishment of a common framework for in managing and safeguarding the protection and sustainable use of soil biodiversity; calls on the Commission to that includes a specific decontamination submit a proposal for the establishment of target; a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil based on scientific data and economic, environmental and social impact assessments;

Or. it

Amendment 430 Alessandra Moretti

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

PE680.715v02-00 212/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; recognises the positive role submit a legislative proposal for the that agriculture and forestry can play establishment of a common framework for through good practices in managing and the protection and sustainable use of soil safeguarding biodiversity; calls on the that includes a specific decontamination Commission to submit a legislative target; proposal for the establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination target;

Or. it

Amendment 431 Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the explore the usefulness of and if deemed establishment of a common framework for appropriate submit an impact-assessed the protection and sustainable use of soil legislative proposal for the establishment that includes a specific decontamination of a risk-based common framework for the target; protection and sustainable use of soil that includes specific decontamination requirements in the case of large-scale negligent conduct based on the polluter pays principle;

Or. en

Amendment 432

AM\1225089EN.docx 213/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls for a legislative proposal submit a legislative proposal for the for the establishment of a common establishment of a common framework for framework for the protection and the protection and sustainable use of soil sustainable use of soil that includes a that includes a specific decontamination specific decontamination target; recognises target; that the various EU soil initiatives should be guided by the principle of subsidiarity and give a prominent role to local authorities;

Or. es

Amendment 433 Christian Doleschal

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal as well as establishment of a common framework for clear and practical guidelines for Member the protection and sustainable use of soil States for the protection and sustainable that includes a specific decontamination use of soil that includes a specific target; decontamination target; recalls within this context that soil falls under the competence of Member States;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 214/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 434 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that the loss of Europe's the basis for key ecological processes; build heritage1a, which provides an notes with concern the increased soil important refuge for many species has degradation and the lack of specific EU contributed to a biodiversity loss; calls on legislation; calls on the Commission to the Commission to take this key factor in submit a legislative proposal for the consideration in other sectoral policies; establishment of a common framework stresses that soil biodiversity is a key for the protection and sustainable use of indicator of ecological processes; notes soil that includes a specific with concern the increased soil decontamination target; degradation; calls on the Commission to propose a specific decontamination target; ______1a In the past, old houses and buildings with traditional attics, old churches, cows' and other animals' sheds, offered a refuge to small animals and birds.

Or. en

Amendment 435 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and sealing; calls on the legislation; calls on the Commission to Commission to submit a proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a new Soil Strategy for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil; the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination

AM\1225089EN.docx 215/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN target;

Or. en

Amendment 436 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a proposal for a new soil strategy establishment of a common framework for for the protection and sustainable use of the protection and sustainable use of soil soil, to be implemented in a manner that includes a specific decontamination consistent with other policies; target;

Or. it

Amendment 437 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the submit a legislative proposal for the establishment of a common framework for establishment of a common framework for the protection and sustainable use of soil the protection and sustainable use of soil that includes a specific decontamination that includes a specific decontamination target; target, including against microplastic pollution;

PE680.715v02-00 216/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 438 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil and subsoil the basis for key ecological processes; biodiversity is the basis for key ecological notes with concern the increased soil processes; notes with concern the increased degradation and the lack of specific EU soil and subsoil degradation and the lack legislation; calls on the Commission to of specific EU legislation; calls on the submit a legislative proposal for the Commission to submit a legislative establishment of a common framework for proposal for the establishment of a the protection and sustainable use of soil common framework for the protection and that includes a specific decontamination sustainable use of soil that includes a target; specific decontamination target;

Or. fr

Amendment 439 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is 7. Highlights that soil biodiversity is the basis for key ecological processes; the basis for key ecological processes; notes with concern the increased soil notes with concern the increased soil degradation and the lack of specific EU degradation and the lack of specific EU legislation; calls on the Commission to legislation; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal for the prepare guidelines for Member States for establishment of a common framework protection and sustainable use of soil that for the protection and sustainable use of includes a specific decontamination target; soil that includes a specific recalls that soil is a national competence decontamination target; and falls under subsidiarity;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 217/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 440 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Highlights that both intensive animal agriculture and intensive aquaculture impact disproportionately on land-use requirements and terrestrial biodiversity due to their inefficient use of feed, notes that intensive aquaculture has additional impacts on marine biodiversity due to its use of feed including fishmeal and oil and the pollution it causes; calls on the Commission to develop a strategy to substantially reduce consumption of animal products including meat, dairy and fish;

Or. en

Amendment 441 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Notes with high concern that the number and variety of species on farmland in Europe has declined over many years1a; encourages Member States to consider the reform of the Common Agriculture Policy as a minimum standard and to implement the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the Farm to Fork Strategy through their CAP national strategic plans; ______1a

PE680.715v02-00 218/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADoc uments/SR20_13/SR_Biodiversity_on_far mland_EN.pdf

Or. en

Amendment 442 Ville Niinistö, Michal Wiezik

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Stresses that soil biodiversity plays an important role in providing vital ecosystem services and mitigating climate change as it is also an important element of terrestrial carbon sinks, whereas for example in boreal forests 50-70% of the carbon is stored in the soils1a; stresses therefore that forest harvesting and agriculture methods that are less invasive on soils should be implemented; ______1a 2019 IPBES report

Or. en

Amendment 443 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Calls on the Commission to design an EU-wide common framework for the protection of soil that shall include common definitions on soil functions and criteria for good status, objectives, indicators, measurable targets and ambitious timelines (based on proper

AM\1225089EN.docx 219/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN impact assessments), harmonised indicators to monitor soil quality and reporting, ensuring integration with relevant policy instruments;

Or. en

Amendment 444 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Recalls that continuing decline in biodiversity has had negative consequences for the delivery of many ecosystem services over the last decades and continuing decline in regulating services can have detrimental consequences for quality of life; stresses that these declines have occurred in part because of the intensive agriculture and forestry practices1a; ______1a IPBES(2018):Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Or. en

Amendment 445 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 220/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Calls on the Member States to build on the recommendations of the Commission1b which facilitate reaching compliance of national Strategic Plans with the goals of the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030; believes that the Plans should foresee adequate financial resources earmarked for environmental restoration of agricultural and rural landscape area; ______1b Staff Working Documents: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/staf f-working-document-com-2020-846- recommendations-member-states-regards- their-strategic-plan-cap_en

Or. en

Amendment 446 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Recalls that water pollution and water exploitation are a major threat to global biodiversity; notes that rivers, wetlands as well as marine and coastal ecosystems play a fundamental role in regulating water and the climate as they serve as important carbon sinks; welcomes the Commission’s commitment to restore 25.000 km of free-flowing rivers in the EU and flood-plains;

Or. en

Amendment 447 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

AM\1225089EN.docx 221/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Recalls that the emergence of new maritime activities and the development of the blue economy requires the European Union to promote a paradigm shift in the maritime spatial planning taking into account the spatial dimension of maritime and coastal activities together with biodiversity; encourages innovative urban and coastal planning relying in particular on the development of infrastructures with positive impacts, such as marine renewable energies with artificial reefs and other innovations promoting reef effect and reserve effect, contributing to the restoration of ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 448 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7b. Recalls that there is an urgent need to strengthen the maritime vision in the new strategies of the European Union, in particular in the follow-up of the Green Deal for Europe, the Biodiversity Strategy and the Farm-to-Fork strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 449 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

PE680.715v02-00 222/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Emphasises that, according to the results of the CORINE programme (coordination of information on the environment) monitoring, land use in Europe has remained relatively stable since 2000, with approximately 25 % covered by permanent arable and crop land, 17 % by pasture and 34 % by forest;

Or. fr

Amendment 450 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7b. Notes that, first and foremost, towns and concrete infrastructure continue to spread and, although artificial surfaces cover less than 5 % of all EEA territory, a considerable proportion (an area slightly smaller than Slovenia) was nonetheless concreted or asphalted over between 2000 and 2018;

Or. fr

Amendment 451 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7c. Points out that while the rate of growth of artificial surfaces has slowed

AM\1225089EN.docx 223/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN from 1 086 km² per year between 2000 and 2006 to 711 km² per year between 2012 and 2018, the most significant losses have been recorded in agricultural land, due largely to urban expansion and the withdrawal of land from agriculture, while the total forested area has remained stable; notes that this reduction in the area of agricultural land, pastureland and natural meadow is similar in size to the increase in artificial surfaces;

Or. fr

Amendment 452 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7d. Points out that since most European cities are built on and surrounded by fertile land, the land occupied and covered by artificial surfaces is generally productive agricultural land; notes, however, that the loss of agricultural land seems to have slowed significantly and almost stopped over the 2012-2018 period;

Or. fr

Amendment 453 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7e. Recalls that urban areas are expanding in Europe, often to the detriment of fertile agricultural land;

PE680.715v02-00 224/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN points out that concrete and asphalt surfaces make the ground impermeable, preventing it from performing its functions such as storing water, producing food and biomass, regulating the climate, providing protection from harmful chemicals and providing habitats;

Or. fr

Amendment 454 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Highlights the need to consider urban and territorial planning as a key tool for nature conservation, since it can lay out landscape and ecological connectivity measures and effectively integrate green infrastructure;

Or. en

Amendment 455 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Recalls that soils waste accounted for more than 520 million tonnes in the EU in 2018; suggests therefore to set a material recovery target for excavated soils as a way to restore degraded soils;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 225/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 456 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7b. Underlines that changes in land use, the expansion and intensification of agriculture, and the unsustainable trade and consumption of wildlife are key drivers of biodiversity loss and increase contacts between wildlife, farm animals, pathogens and people, which create the conditions for emerging infectious diseases;

Or. en

Amendment 457 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7b. Highlights that a sustainable use of soil must rely on a comprehensive monitoring of soil quality; suggests as a result mandatory soil diagnosis and tracing to guarantee a safe, sustainable and circular use of European soils.

Or. en

Amendment 458 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 226/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 7b. Is aware of the difficulties regarding sea use through marine spatial planning, especially to design marine protected areas beyond the jurisdictional waters of Member States; calls on Member States to fully implement the Marine Spatial Planning Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 459 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7c. Notes that the EU's food and agricultural system drives biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse globally through direct and indirect land use change, especially through imported soya used for animal feed and palm oil used for biofuels and food, which both cause massive tropical and subtropical deforestation and habitat conversion;

Or. en

Amendment 460 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed deleted to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation;

AM\1225089EN.docx 227/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. it

Amendment 461 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality1a 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be by 2030 in the framework of the United achieved; calls on the Commission, Nations Convention to Combat therefore, to present an EU-level strategy Desertification (UNCCD), but that this on desertification and land degradation; target is unlikely to be achieved as concluded by the European Court of Auditors special report2a; regrets that despite the threat that desertification poses to biodiversity, soil fertility, land’s natural resilience, food production or water quality, and despite the fact that thirteen Member States have declared themselves to be affected by desertification under the UNCCD, the Commission is not effectively and efficiently addressing it; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU- level strategy on desertification and land degradation; ______1a Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) has been defined by the Parties to the Convention as: A state whereby the amount and quality of land resources, necessary to support ecosystem functions and services and enhance food security, remains stable or increases within specified temporal and spatial scales and ecosystems. 2a Special report n°33/2018 of the European Court of Auditors “Combating desertification in the EU: a growing threat in need of more action”. https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocI

PE680.715v02-00 228/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN tem.aspx?did=48393

Or. en

Amendment 462 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation; on desertification and land degradation, strengthening as far as possible the measures on prevention and on the monitoring of areas most exposed to soil degradation, such as those affected by abandonment, hydrogeological instability or coastal erosion;

Or. it

Amendment 463 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; sees forestry as a demonstrator therefore, to present an EU-level strategy for a green infrastructure that provides on desertification and land degradation; indispensable ecosystem services for people, nature and the economy and delivers the preconditions for a smart green and regional economy; calls on the

AM\1225089EN.docx 229/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Commission, therefore, to present an EU- level strategy on desertification and land degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 464 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; emphasises the importance of therefore, to present an EU-level strategy the multifunctionality of agriculture for on desertification and land degradation; soil conservation and calls on the Commission to support such practices; calls on the Commission to present an EU- level strategy on desertification and land degradation;

Or. it

Amendment 465 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present without delay an on desertification and land degradation; ambitious EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation that is fully compatible with the Strategy on

PE680.715v02-00 230/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Adaptation;

Or. en

Amendment 466 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to include desertification and on desertification and land degradation; land degradation aspects in the regulatory development of the biodiversity strategy;

Or. es

Amendment 467 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation; on desertification and land degradation and the abandonment of agricultural land;

Or. it

Amendment 468 Pietro Fiocchi

AM\1225089EN.docx 231/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation; on desertification and land degradation and the abandonment of agricultural land;

Or. it

Amendment 469 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to step up its ambition and on desertification and land degradation; present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 470 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission,

PE680.715v02-00 232/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present at the earliest on desertification and land degradation; opportunity an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation;

Or. ro

Amendment 471 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030; calls on the Commission to also achieved; calls on the Commission, present an EU-level strategy on therefore, to present an EU-level strategy desertification and land degradation; on desertification and land degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 472 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present a full strategy to on desertification and land degradation; Member States on desertification and land degradation;

Or. fr

Amendment 473

AM\1225089EN.docx 233/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Alexandr Vondra, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Recalls that the EU has committed 8. Recalls that the EU has committed to achieving land degradation neutrality by to achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be 2030, but that this target is unlikely to be achieved; calls on the Commission, achieved; calls on the Commission, therefore, to present an EU-level strategy therefore, to present an EU-level strategy on desertification and land degradation; to curb desertification and land degradation;

Or. en

Amendment 474 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8a. Highlights that both intensive animal agriculture and intensive aquaculture impact disproportionately on land-use requirements and respective biodiversity including through the external feed inputs; calls on the Commission and Member States to bring about the change including through the EAGF, EAFRD and EMFF;

Or. en

Amendment 475 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 234/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

8a. Raises awareness for the upcoming economic exploration of coastal areas and oceans, and the consequent need to anticipate adequate European legislation that sets up rules and standards towards biodiversity protection by reducing the negative impacts eventual economic activities might provoke on marine habitats;

Or. en

Amendment 476 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8a. Calls on the Commission to address ocean degradation, ocean eutrophication and acidification, by presenting an ambitious action plan to protect marine ecosystems and conserve fisheries resources;

Or. en

Amendment 477 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8a. Notes that in the Union, urbanisation and leisure activities account for 13% of all reported pressures on nature overall, and 48 % of all marine pressures1a;

AM\1225089EN.docx 235/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ______1a European Environment Agency (2020). State of the Nature in the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 478 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8b. Calls on Member States to encourage more conservation farming where possible, which reduces soil management practices to a minimum, through the use of innovative technologies such as ‘no-till-drills’, in order to help restore and build soil organic matter, soil moisture, carbon storage in the uppermost soil layers and prevent soil erosion overall;

Or. en

Amendment 479 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure and to develop a Trans-European Network for Green Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N); European Nature Network (TEN-N); calls, in particular, on the Commission to share the administration of these TEN-G and

PE680.715v02-00 236/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN TEN-N areas with local communities and with forestry, agriculture and research operators and all other stakeholders, by setting up intermediate management structures to encourage shared approaches for adopting effective, participatory, transparent and consistent long-term solutions that tackle biodiversity loss in a tangible manner;

Or. it

Amendment 480 Agnès Evren, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure, and measures to Trans-European Network for Green combat land take, and to develop a Trans- Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Network for Green Infrastructure European Nature Network (TEN-N); (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N); highlights the need to systematically incorporate solutions based on nature and biodiversity protection into urban planning and architecture; supports the Commission’s creation of an European Platform for Urban Greening;

Or. fr

Amendment 481 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 237/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure, including binding Trans-European Network for Green norms on a minimum amount of square Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- meters of easily accessible green natural European Nature Network (TEN-N); spaces per inhabitant - for instance an Urban Green Norm of at least 9m2 per capita and access to green spaces of at least 1 ha within 300 meters of home for all urban population - and to develop a Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. en

Amendment 482 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure and to develop a Trans-European Network for Green Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N); European Nature Network (TEN-N); highlights that green infrastructure provides ecosystem services that support biodiversity, by for example increasing the quantity of ecological corridors in urban environments;

Or. en

Amendment 483 Silvia Modig, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

PE680.715v02-00 238/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure and to develop a Trans-European Network for Green Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N); European Nature Network (TEN-N); urges the Commission to reduce substantially the inequalities in access to urban green areas within cities;

Or. en

Amendment 484 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Ulrike Müller

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Member States to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure; Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European Nature Network (TEN- N);

Or. en

Amendment 485 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set

AM\1225089EN.docx 239/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions, the green infrastructure and to develop a reinforcement of terrestrial and marine Trans-European Network for Green ecological corridors, green infrastructure Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- and to develop a Trans-European Network European Nature Network (TEN-N); for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. en

Amendment 486 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity corresponding to the green infrastructure and to develop a reduction targets stated in the Strategy, Trans-European Network for Green nature-based solutions and green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- infrastructure and to develop a Trans- European Nature Network (TEN-N); European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. en

Amendment 487 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, as well as short timeframes green infrastructure and to develop a for the implementation of these nature- Trans-European Network for Green based solutions and green infrastructure, Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- and to develop a Trans-European Network

PE680.715v02-00 240/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN European Nature Network (TEN-N); for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. ro

Amendment 488 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and peri-urban biodiversity, nature-based green infrastructure and to develop a solutions and green infrastructure and to Trans-European Network for Green develop a Trans-European Network for Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the European Nature Network (TEN-N); Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. fr

Amendment 489 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban specific ambitious targets on urban biodiversity, nature-based solutions and biodiversity, nature-based solutions and green infrastructure and to develop a green infrastructure and to include Green Trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure in the Trans-European Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Nature Network (TEN-N); Trans-European Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 241/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 490 Christian Doleschal

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Calls on the Commission to set 9. Calls on the Commission to set specific ambitious targets on urban realistic targets on urban biodiversity, biodiversity, nature-based solutions and nature-based solutions and green green infrastructure and to develop a infrastructure and to develop a Trans- Trans-European Network for Green European Network for Green Infrastructure Infrastructure (TEN-G) linked to the Trans- (TEN-G) linked to the Trans-European European Nature Network (TEN-N); Nature Network (TEN-N);

Or. en

Amendment 491 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Calls on the Commission to develop environmental regeneration processes by restoring natural areas in built-up zones, thereby encouraging the removal of unused, outdated or dilapidated buildings and infrastructure by private and public bodies; notes that this process would also help to improve the landscape and relieve citizens and local authorities of the tax burdens potentially involved in maintaining such properties;

Or. it

Amendment 492 Ville Niinistö

PE680.715v02-00 242/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Embraces the ambitions set out in the Water Framework Directive and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and calls for their full and swift implementation ; recalls in this respect that the2020 objective to achieve Good Environmental Status (GES) for European Seas has not been achieved; highlights that the river and basin management plans are supposed to achieve the objectives of the Water Framework Directive by 2027;

Or. en

Amendment 493 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Encourages the development of nature based solutions and green infrastructure in coastal cities, which are generally located near wetlands, to preserve biodiversity and coastal ecosystems as well as to strengthen the sustainable development of the economy, tourism and coastal landscapes, which also help to improve resilience to climate change in these vulnerable areas, particularly affected by sea level rise;

Or. en

Amendment 494 Hermann Tertsch

AM\1225089EN.docx 243/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Recalls that innovation and new technologies are vital tools allowing farmers to adapt their practices to the new demands of improving biodiversity in the EU; highlights that the legislative framework should encourage and incentivise the adoption of new and innovative practices and the digitisation of agriculture;

Or. es

Amendment 495 Dolors Montserrat, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Underlines the importance of urban green areas and green infrastructures for the physical and mental well-being of the population, especially the most vulnerable groups such as children and the elderly, and for the adequate education of future generations in healthy lifestyles;

Or. en

Amendment 496 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Hildegard Bentele

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 244/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Highlights the importance of systematically integrating green infrastructure and nature-based solutions in urban planning, including in public spaces, public infrastructure, and the design of buildings and their surroundings to reduce soil sealing;

Or. en

Amendment 497 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Stresses the importance of improving the ‘nature in the city’ concept; notes that nature is a means of mitigating all city-related pressures, whether they are harmful to humans or to the environment;

Or. fr

Amendment 498 Cyrus Engerer

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9a. Urges the Commission to ensure that the sensitivity of species and habitats to different human pressures in all sea areas are accounted on national marine spatial plans;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 245/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 499 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9b. Highlights the importance of maintaining and restoring high-diversity landscape features, extensive farmland as well as sloping and terraced vineyards in agricultural landscapes for their value in terms of biodiversity, pollinators and the natural biological control of pests; calls on the Member States to develop the necessary measures under their Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plans to promote non-productive areas and features, extensive farmland as well as sloping and terraced vineyards; points out that extensively managed farmland and the cultivation of vines on slopes or terraces with drystone walls need to be taken into account as high-diversity landscape as those unique habitats can only be preserved if they are cultivated;

Or. en

Amendment 500 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9b. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to restore 25,000 km of free- flowing rivers in the EU through the removal of primarily obsolete barriers and the restoration of floodplains and wetlands; considers that obsolete dams should be removed to increase the natural

PE680.715v02-00 246/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN flow of rivers whilst new hydropower plants should not be allowed in protected areas; stresses that where barriers are already built, the obligations for owners of such facilities must be strengthened in order to help migratory fish pass such barriers;

Or. en

Amendment 501 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9b. Recognises that extensively grazed pasture, regardless of the intended use of grazing livestock, is a highly valuable and seriously threatened ecosystem that needs appropriate European-wide protection and management in order to safeguard biodiversity;

Or. es

Amendment 502 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9b. Points out that, in order to bring nature into our lives, the environment must be at the heart of the numerous European projects, and not the reverse;

Or. fr

AM\1225089EN.docx 247/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 503 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Andreas Glück, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Takes note of the 2030 targets of targets of bringing at least 25 % of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land agricultural land under organic farm under organic farm management and management, which should become the ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural norm in the long term, and ensuring that at land consists of high-diversity landscape least 10 % of agricultural land consists of features; acknowledges the benefits of high-diversity landscape features, which organic farming for biodiversity while should be implemented at farm level, stressing the need to consider trade-offs targets which should both be incorporated regarding different aspects of into EU legislation; considers it imperative sustainability; thus calls for exploiting the that farmers receive support and training in strengths of different farming models and the transition towards agroecological further improving them on their practices; weaknesses; stresses, that an area target approach threatens profitability of organic farming and hence could increase dependency on subsidies which would be in contradiction to the aim of the Farm to Fork Strategy to make sustainable farming a profitable business model for European farmers and calls for a market- driven uptake of organic farming instead; considers it imperative that farmers receive sufficient support and educational training as part of risk management- and advisory services offered by National Authorities in the transition towards agroecological and sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 504 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030

PE680.715v02-00 248/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing 25 % of agricultural agricultural land under organic farm land under organic farm management, management, which should become the which should become the norm in the long norm in the long term, and ensuring that at term, and ensuring that 10 % of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of agricultural land consists of high-diversity high-diversity landscape features, which landscape features, which should be should be implemented at farm level, implemented at farm level, targets which targets which should both be incorporated should both be incorporated into EU into EU legislation; considers it imperative legislation; considers it imperative that that farmers receive support and training in farmers receive support and training in the the transition towards agroecological transition towards agroecological practices, practices; with a view to responding to market demands, and to the objectives set out in this strategy, by expanding the supply of local organic products and reducing import volumes; invites the Commission to take the necessary action to support demand for organic products, maintaining a market balance in the face of the inevitable increase in supply; calls for the Action Plan and the new EU regulations to be integrated with European strategies and to help define a clear horizon for organic farming in the future;

Or. it

Amendment 505 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which needs to go hand in norm in the long term, and ensuring that at hand with market developments and least 10 % of agricultural land consists of ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural high-diversity landscape features, which land consists of high-diversity landscape should be implemented at farm level, features or extensively managed farmland targets which should both be incorporated (e.g. orchard meadows, alpine pastures into EU legislation; considers it imperative and meadows, wet meadows) which should

AM\1225089EN.docx 249/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN that farmers receive support and training in be cumulatively assessed before the transition towards agroecological incorporated into EU legislation, in practices; particular in light of potential trade-offs for land availability and prices, which may result in more intensive production; considers it imperative that active farmers receive more support or are provided with knowledge and training, technology and innovation as well as legal certainty in the transition towards more agroecological practices as well as appropriate remuneration of their biodiversity-friendly produced products on market;

Or. en

Amendment 506 Esther de Lange, Jan Huitema, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Takes note of the proposed 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, while pointing at the same norm in the long term, and ensuring that time to the higher acreage needed for at least 10 % of agricultural land consists organic production, as well as the higher of high-diversity landscape features, which cost to the farmer, which is often not should be implemented at farm level, translated into a better price; therefore targets which should both be incorporated calls on the Commission to include other into EU legislation; considers it imperative circular and sustainable farming methods that farmers receive support and training in in its 2030 target; supports the ambition to the transition towards agroecological ensure through voluntary approach that at practices; least 10 % of agricultural land at EU-level consists of high-diversity landscape features; considers it imperative that farmers receive financial and other support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices; underlines the importance of continued technological and biological innovation for the benefit of biodiversity and to enable farmers to maintain their

PE680.715v02-00 250/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN production levels;

Or. en

Amendment 507 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the medium-long term in each least 10 % of agricultural land consists of Member State, and ensuring that at least 10 high-diversity landscape features, which % of agricultural land consists of high- should be implemented at farm level, diversity landscape features, which should targets which should both be incorporated be implemented at farm level in a timely into EU legislation; considers it imperative manner, targets which should both be that farmers receive support and training in incorporated into EU legislation; considers the transition towards agroecological it imperative that farmers receive support practices; and training in the transition towards agroecological practices away from monocultures, agriculture dependent on external fossil and chemical input and intensive animal agriculture, and towards sustainable and higher-welfare animal farming practices that can drastically reduce the over-reliance on antimicrobial treatments, and contribute to restoring biodiversity instead of depleting it;

Or. en

Amendment 508 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

AM\1225089EN.docx 251/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the medium-long term in each least 10 % of agricultural land consists of Member State, and ensuring that at least 10 high-diversity landscape features, which % of agricultural land consists of high- should be implemented at farm level, diversity landscape features, which should targets which should both be incorporated be implemented at farm level, targets into EU legislation; considers it imperative which should both be incorporated into EU that farmers receive support and training in legislation; considers it imperative that the transition towards agroecological farmers receive support and training in the practices; transition towards agroecological practices, away from monocultures, agriculture dependent on external fossil and chemical input and intensive animal agriculture, and towards sustainable and higher- welfare animal farming practices that can drastically reduce the over-reliance on antimicrobial treatments, and contribute to restoring biodiversity instead of depleting it;

Or. en

Amendment 509 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation and implemented by that farmers receive support and training in the CAP Strategic Plans which should set the transition towards agroecological the binding midterm and 2027 farm

PE680.715v02-00 252/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN practices; targets in this respect; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices, where relevant also in synergy with improved animal welfare, and that early movers and farmers managing high-nature value areas receive support for the delivery of public goods;

Or. en

Amendment 510 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of introducing a market-oriented agricultural land under organic farm target corridor for agricultural land under management, which should become the organic farm management after a norm in the long term, and ensuring that at comprehensive impact assessment, and least 10 % of agricultural land consists of ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural high-diversity landscape features, which land consists of high-diversity landscape should be implemented at farm level, features, which should be implemented at targets which should both be incorporated farm level, targets which should both be into EU legislation; considers it imperative cumulatively assessed before being that farmers receive support and training in incorporated into EU legislation in the transition towards agroecological particular in light of potential trade-offs practices; for food security, land availability and prices, which may result in more intensive production; considers it imperative that farmers receive support, training, innovation as well as appropriate financial support and legal certainty in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 511

AM\1225089EN.docx 253/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 %of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation; strongly regrets that that farmers receive support and training in Parliament’s CAP Strategic Plan the transition towards agroecological Regulation text sets a mandatory practices; minimum target of just 5% of arable land, not 10% of agricultural area, at farm level, to be devoted to non-productive features or areas; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 512 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features - should be implemented at farm level, provided that food self-sufficiency and targets which should both be incorporated stability of the EU are not jeopardised and

PE680.715v02-00 254/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN into EU legislation; considers it imperative food imports from non-EU countries are that farmers receive support and training in not increased, which will be reduced in the transition towards agroecological the EU as a result of organic farming - practices; which should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 513 Ondřej Knotek

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features provided should be implemented at farm level, that food self-sufficiency and stability of targets which should both be incorporated the EU are not jeopardised and food into EU legislation; considers it imperative imports from non-EU countries are not that farmers receive support and training in increased, which will be reduced in the the transition towards agroecological EU as a result of organic farming, which practices; should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 514 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 255/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management - whilst noting that the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at geographic realities of some Member least 10 % of agricultural land consists of States make this difficult to achieve due to high-diversity landscape features, which their size and the proximity of should be implemented at farm level, agricultural areas to contaminants targets which should both be incorporated outside of farmers' control - which should into EU legislation; considers it imperative become the norm in the long term, and that farmers receive support and training in ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural the transition towards agroecological land consists of high-diversity landscape practices; features, which should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 515 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Takes note of the growing demand targets of bringing at least 25 % of for organic agricultural products and agricultural land under organic farm expresses its support for the ambition to management, which should become the help European farmers and producers to norm in the long term, and ensuring that meet this demand; considers it imperative at least 10 % of agricultural land consists that farmers receive support and training in of high-diversity landscape features, the transition towards more sustainable which should be implemented at farm practices; level, targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

PE680.715v02-00 256/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 516 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Notes the 2030 targets of bringing targets of bringing at least 25 % of 25 % of agricultural land under organic agricultural land under organic farm farm management, taking into account the management, which should become the progress already made by Member States norm in the long term, and ensuring that at as well as the real market outlets for least 10 % of agricultural land consists of organic products, and ensuring that at least high-diversity landscape features, which 10 % of European agricultural land is should be implemented at farm level, given over to high-diversity landscape targets which should both be incorporated features, taking into account, too, the into EU legislation; considers it imperative existing CAP regulations; considers it that farmers receive support and training in imperative that farmers receive support and the transition towards agroecological training in the transition towards more practices; sustainable practices and that these targets do not compromise strategic targets relating to the common agricultural policy, European food safety and protection of the level of supply of Member States;

Or. it

Amendment 517 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Notes the 2030 targets of bringing targets of bringing at least 25 % of 25 % of agricultural land under organic agricultural land under organic farm farm management, taking into account the management, which should become the progress already made by Member States norm in the long term, and ensuring that at as well as the real market outlets for least 10 % of agricultural land consists of organic products, and ensuring that 10 %

AM\1225089EN.docx 257/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN high-diversity landscape features, which of European agricultural land is given over should be implemented at farm level, to high-diversity landscape features, taking targets which should both be incorporated into account, too, the existing CAP into EU legislation; considers it imperative regulations; considers it imperative that that farmers receive support and training in farmers receive support and training in the the transition towards agroecological transition towards more sustainable practices; practices and that these targets do not compromise strategic targets relating to the common agricultural policy, European food safety and protection of the level of supply of Member States;

Or. it

Amendment 518 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in that farmers receive support, particularly the transition towards agroecological financial support, and training in the practices; transition towards sustainable practices; believes that farmers must receive appropriate market prices for products produced sustainably;

Or. fr

Amendment 519 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 258/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation and based on reliable that farmers receive support and training in scientific data and comprehensive impact the transition towards agroecological assessments, which take into account practices; economic impacts alongside impacts on food security and food safety; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 520 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of supporting the development of agricultural land under organic farm organic farming in line with market management, which should become the trends, and ensuring, on a voluntary basis, norm in the long term, and ensuring that at that 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level; should be implemented at farm level, considers it imperative that farmers receive targets which should both be incorporated financial and other support as well as into EU legislation; considers it imperative training in the transition towards more that farmers receive support and training in sustainable practices, and that products the transition towards agroecological obtained in this way are properly practices; promoted; notes, too, that all available production techniques should be used to

AM\1225089EN.docx 259/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ensure that there is sufficient supply to meet market demands;

Or. it

Amendment 521 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, if the same least 10 % of agricultural land consists of requirement is set for EU imports, so that high-diversity landscape features, which European farmers are not placed at a should be implemented at farm level, disadvantage, and ensuring that at least targets which should both be incorporated 10 % of agricultural land consists of high- into EU legislation; considers it imperative diversity landscape features, which should that farmers receive support and training in be implemented at farm level, targets the transition towards agroecological which should both be incorporated into EU practices; legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. fi

Amendment 522 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of

PE680.715v02-00 260/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation; considers it imperative that farmers receive support and training in that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological the transition towards sustainable farming practices; practices that contribute to the conservation of landscape elements, ecological continuity and local biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 523 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing 25 % of agricultural agricultural land under organic farm land under organic farm management, management, which should become the provided it is market driven, and ensuring norm in the long term, and ensuring that at that, through the voluntary approach, at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land at EU level high-diversity landscape features, which is under high-diversity landscape features, should be implemented at farm level, biodiversity-benefitting productive targets which should both be incorporated features and management practices; into EU legislation; considers it imperative considers it imperative that farmers receive that farmers receive support and training in financial and other support, and training the transition towards agroecological in the transition towards more sustainable practices; practices, and appropriate market remuneration will be set for this way of production;

Or. en

Amendment 524 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

AM\1225089EN.docx 261/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management and proposing to the norm in the long term, and ensuring that Member States that at least 10 % of at least 10 % of agricultural land consists agricultural land consists of high-diversity of high-diversity landscape features, which landscape features, which should be should be implemented at farm level, implemented at farm level; considers it targets which should both be incorporated imperative that farmers receive support and into EU legislation; considers it imperative training in the transition towards that farmers receive support and training in agroecological practices; the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. fr

Amendment 525 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management by introducing a targeted norm in the long term, and ensuring that corridor whereby considering actual at least 10 % of agricultural land consists market demand; highlights that all targets of high-diversity landscape features, should be incorporated into EU legislation; which should be implemented at farm considers it imperative that farmers receive level, targets which should both be continuous support and training in the incorporated into EU legislation; considers transition towards agroecological practices; it imperative that farmers receive support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 526 César Luena

PE680.715v02-00 262/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should become the norm in the long term, and ensuring that at norm in the long term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural land consists of least 10 % of agricultural land consists of high-diversity landscape features, which high-diversity landscape features, which should be implemented at farm level, should be implemented at farm level, targets which should both be incorporated targets which should both be incorporated into EU legislation; considers it imperative into EU legislation; in view of potential that farmers receive support and training in socioeconomic impacts, considers it the transition towards agroecological imperative that farmers receive support and practices; training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 527 Alexandr Vondra, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses the need to have targets targets of bringing at least 25 % of of reducing areas under highly- agricultural land under organic farm intensive/industrial agriculture and management, which should become the significantly reducing the use of norm in the long term, and ensuring that at agricultural land for purposes other than least 10 % of agricultural land consists of the production of food and feed, and high-diversity landscape features, which ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural should be implemented at farm level, land consists of high-diversity landscape targets which should both be incorporated features, which should be implemented at into EU legislation; considers it imperative farm level, targets which should both be that farmers receive support and training in incorporated into EU legislation; considers the transition towards agroecological that Member States should consider to practices; offer farmers support and training in the transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 263/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 528 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 25 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land in each Member management, which should become the State under organic farm management, norm in the long term, and ensuring that at which should become the norm in the long least 10 % of agricultural land consists of term, and ensuring that at least 10 % of high-diversity landscape features, which agricultural land consists of high-diversity should be implemented at farm level, landscape features, which should be targets which should both be incorporated implemented at farm level, targets which into EU legislation; considers it imperative should both be incorporated into EU that farmers receive support and training in legislation; considers it imperative that the transition towards agroecological farmers receive support and training in the practices; transition towards agroecological practices;

Or. en

Amendment 529 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Expresses its support for the 2030 targets of bringing at least 25 % of targets of bringing at least 30 % of agricultural land under organic farm agricultural land under organic farm management, which should become the management, which should increase and norm in the long term, and ensuring that at become the norm in the long term, and least 10 % of agricultural land consists of ensuring that at least 10 % of agricultural high-diversity landscape features, which land consists of high-diversity landscape should be implemented at farm level, features, which should be implemented at targets which should both be incorporated farm level, targets which should both be into EU legislation; considers it imperative incorporated into EU legislation; considers that farmers receive support and training in it imperative that farmers receive support the transition towards agroecological and training in the transition towards practices; agroecological practices;

PE680.715v02-00 264/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 530 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Notes the 2030 targets of bringing targets of bringing at least 25 % of at least 25 % of agricultural land under agricultural land under organic farm organic farm management and ensuring management, which should become the that at least 10 % of agricultural land norm in the long term, and ensuring that at consists of high-diversity landscape least 10 % of agricultural land consists of features, which should be implemented at high-diversity landscape features, which farm level, targets which should both be should be implemented at farm level, incorporated into EU legislation; considers targets which should both be incorporated it imperative that farmers receive support into EU legislation; considers it imperative and training in the transition towards more that farmers receive support and training in sustainable practices that guarantee the transition towards agroecological biodiversity; practices;

Or. es

Amendment 531 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Expresses its support for the 2030 10. Notes the 2030 targets and is in targets of bringing at least 25 % of favour of increasing agricultural land for agricultural land under organic farm organic production or for other management, which should become the agroecological practices that are in line norm in the long term, and ensuring that with market developments, and of at least 10 % of agricultural land consists devoting, by way of a voluntary approach, of high-diversity landscape features, which agricultural land at EU level to high- should be implemented at farm level, diversity landscape features; considers it targets which should both be incorporated imperative that farmers receive financial into EU legislation; considers it imperative and other support and training in the that farmers receive support and training in transition towards more sustainable

AM\1225089EN.docx 265/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN the transition towards agroecological practices, including by establishing practices; appropriate compensation for products grown in this way;

Or. it

Amendment 532 Ville Niinistö, Eleonora Evi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Recalls that livestock production is one of the main direct drivers of biodiversity loss; stresses that the current levels of meat and dairy consumption need to be significantly reduced by 2030 in order to reverse the current trend in biodiversity decline as well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions; calls on the European Commission to introduce EU targets on meat and dairy consumption reduction, which should reflect the urgent need to limit livestock production to within EU carrying capacity, whilst respecting high animal welfare standards, based on grazing and home grown fodder whilst eliminating deforestation-driving imports of feed; calls, in parallel, on the Commission and Member States to step up efforts to promote healthy, sustainable plant based diets among EU citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 533 Jutta Paulus

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 266/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 10a. Highlights the importance of Paludiculture as form of productive land use of wetlands and peatlands that stops degradation, subsidence and minimises emissions, calls for the large-scale implementation of Paludiculture in suitable bogs and mires that are used unsustainably today and for combination with incentives and support for landowners when they rewet drained agricultural peatlands; stresses that conservation strategies like rewilding can also play a crucial role in restoring keystone species and repairing damaged ecosystems; calls on the Commission to provide sufficient funding for sustainable use of peatlands and wetlands;

Or. en

Amendment 534 Eleonora Evi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Supports the Commission’s call to restore 25,000 km of free-flowing rivers in the EU through the removal of primarily obsolete barriers and the restoration of flood plains and wetlands; believes that hydropower can severely impact freshwater ecosystems, including fish migration and habitat loss; therefore, calls for a stop on EU subsidies to new hydroelectric plants as well as the exclusion of new plants from the list of renewable energies eligible for state aid and finally a ban on hydroelectric power plants in protected areas;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 267/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 535 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Notes that Member States will contribute differently to the organic Union-wide targets depending on the level of development of their organic sector and therefore calls for the setting of national targets; highlights that these targets will not be met without a strong financial support, solid training programmes and advisory services; calls on Member States to shape their CAP strategic plans in consequence and on the Commission to make sure these strategic plans are up to the task;

Or. en

Amendment 536 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Calls on the Commission to urgently assess the impact of the natural pesticides commonly used in organic farming, such as copper and sulphur, in order to guarantee consistency between the new organic farming targets and the sustainability indicators suggested in both the Farm to Fork Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy 2030;

Or. es

Amendment 537

PE680.715v02-00 268/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Calls for the role of sustainable agricultural systems and practices in preserving landscape features, ensuring ecological continuity and conserving biodiversity to be recognised, and for the creation of mechanisms to further develop such systems and practices; stresses the need to incentivise the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices, but without rewarding systems that are more harmful to biodiversity, the landscape and ecological continuity;

Or. pt

Amendment 538 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Considers that EU agriculture needs to be streamlined towards a true ecological and climate transition in line with the objectives of the Farm to Fork Strategy and the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 for which the new CAP strategic plans are a unique and the only opportunity; urges the Commission and the Member States to mobilise both resources and actors towards these priorities in an effective and consistent way;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 269/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 539 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Highlights that the efficient uptake of nutrients by plants simultaneously reduces losses to the environment and supports the target of reducing nutrient loss; calls for the promotion of optimizing plant nutrition by enhancing nutrient use efficiency; supports therefore the approach of precision and smart farming, plant nutrition advisory services and management support;

Or. en

Amendment 540 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Stresses that agriculture is one of the biggest drivers of biodiversity loss; reiterates, following its resolution on the European Green Deal of 15th January 2020, that the common agricultural policy (CAP) should be fully in line with the EU's increased climate and biodiversity ambition and well as the Biodiversity and Farm to Fork Strategies;

Or. en

Amendment 541

PE680.715v02-00 270/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Dolors Montserrat, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Calls on the Commission to propose measures to help Member States tackling the problem of coexistence of livestock farming with large carnivores; recalls the need to have clear guidelines to implement measures that comply with the Directive92/43/EU on Habitats and address the problem of wolf hybridisation;

Or. en

Amendment 542 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Stresses that many Member States already follow as many ecological practices as possible; underlines that it must be taken into account that not all farmers have the possibility to switch to organic farming; mentions that conventional farming can also contribute to increasing biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 543 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 271/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Calls for a halt to the construction of wind parks, which disturb marine and terrestrial ecosystems; emphasises that this infrastructure permanently alters some species and still presents recycling and replacement difficulties;

Or. fr

Amendment 544 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Emphasises that farmers have a key role in the success of this strategy as guardians of our shared environmental and cultural heritage and that this strategy should be aligned with the measures, goals and targets of the Farm to Fork strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 545 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. calls on Commission and Member States to take into account voluntary measures as well as pressure on the availability of agricultural land when implementing measures regarding high- diversity landscape features;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 272/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 546 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10a. Stresses that a 25% target for organic farming is ambitious and laudable but considers that it cannot legally be imposed without addressing market developments and demand;

Or. es

Amendment 547 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10b. Deplores the fact that simplistic forestry concepts and definitions are used which define forests purely as a percentage of land with tree crown cover, which leads to the adoption of equally simplistic deforestation and reforestation concepts, with the result, for example, of vast monocultures being classified as reforestation; warns that forests cannot be considered solely as carbon sinks; calls for the adoption of a definition of forest that includes the biological, social and cultural diversity that genuine forests represent, where ecosystems, habitats and local communities are protected;

Or. pt

Amendment 548

AM\1225089EN.docx 273/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10b. Highlights the role that public procurement can play in contributing to transition to more ecological farming practices in Europe and calls for the introduction of a minimum mandatory sustainability target under the EU public procurement legislative framework so as to ensure that at least 30 % of contracts for food and catering services are awarded based on compliance with Regulation (EU) 2018/8481a. ______1a Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (OJ L 150, 14.6.2018, p. 1).

Or. en

Amendment 549 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10b. Stresses the need to come up with suitable alternatives were restrictions are put in place, to ensure that farmers have access to a proper toolbox of safe, effective and affordable solutions to protect their crops and plants, as well as access to the latest knowledge, technology and the best advisory services;

PE680.715v02-00 274/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 550 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10b. Underlines the importance of biodiversity in ensuring dietary adequacy; considers that farmers should be supported to foster sustainable diets with an emphasis on nutritionally rich varieties of plants and breeds of animals that are best suited for the local environment and contribute to local biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 551 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10b. Supports the development of new genome editing techniques so that farmers can access more and better tools to ensure that their practices comply with the obligations under the Biodiversity Strategy 2030; calls on the Commission to amend the current legal framework so that it no longer forms a brake on innovation in plant breeding; highlights that chemical pesticides can only be eliminated if farmers have access to effective alternatives for combating the new pests and diseases that are devastating Mediterranean agriculture;

Or. es

AM\1225089EN.docx 275/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 552 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10d. Notes that the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops is incompatible with organic farming, and thus undermines the aim to increase the amount of land under organic production in the EU, especially in light of the problem of cross-pollination with non- GM crops;

Or. en

Amendment 553 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10c. Notes that GM crops reduce genetic diversity and that the most common GM traits of herbicide tolerance and production of Bt proteins have adverse affects on biodiversity; underlines that herbicide tolerant crops result in an increased use of ‘complementary’ herbicides1a; notes that the first commercially available gene edited crop has been made herbicide tolerant; ______1a See, for example, Bonny, S., ‘Genetically Modified Herbicide-Tolerant Crops, Weeds, and Herbicides: Overview and Impact’, Environmental Management, January 2016,57(1), pp. 31- 48,

PE680.715v02-00 276/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/262 96738, Benbrook, C.M., ‘Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. - the first sixteen years’, Environmental Sciences Europe 24, 24 (2012), https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articl es/10.1186/2190-4715-24-24 and Schütte, G., Eckerstorfer, M., Rastelli, V. et al., ‘Herbicide resistance and biodiversity: agronomic and environmental aspects of genetically modified herbicide-resistant plants’, Environmental Sciences Europe 29, 5 (2017), https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s 12302-016-0100-y and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 292944439_Trends_in_glyphosate_herbic ide_use_in_the_United_States_and_globa lly.

Or. en

Amendment 554 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10c. Emphasises that properly managed hunting is a valuable tool in biodiversity conservation; notes that populations of game species, if sustainably hunted, can be permanently conserved, which brings major benefits for natural ecosystems;

Or. es

Amendment 555 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

AM\1225089EN.docx 277/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by- fishing practices and the elimination of by- catches of sensitive species; catches of sensitive species; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to develop and implement gentler methods of capture, landing and slaughter of fish in order to reduce stress and improve fish quality; notes that allowing fish populations to grow should have the goal of increasing biodiversity, not of increasing human consumption of fish; underlines that the capture of fish to feed carnivorous farmed fish is a driver of marine biodiversity loss as well as a major animal welfare issue, and is therefore a practice that should be ended;

Or. en

Amendment 556 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by- fishing practices and the elimination of by- catches of sensitive species; catches of sensitive species; calls for strategic management that includes, on the one hand, raising awareness among operators so as to create the right conditions for a new culture of waste management both at sea and in ports and, on the other hand, developing projects to incentivise operators in the fishing industry to collect maritime waste, by recognising the strategic role that they already play and can continue to play in

PE680.715v02-00 278/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN making our seas cleaner;

Or. it

Amendment 557 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Regrets that the EU's commitment must be subject to maximum sustainable to fully respect Maximum Sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal Yield (MSY) by 2020, which was a key fishing practices and the elimination of by- objective of the Common Fisheries Policy, catches of sensitive species; has not been achieved; stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to MSY levels, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by-catches of sensitive species; calls on the Commission and Member States to commit to the full recovery of marine habitats and fish stocks below MSY using an ecosystem based approach to fisheries management by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 558 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by- fishing practices and the elimination of by- catches of sensitive species; catches of sensitive species; recommends that data be continuously gathered so as to better evaluate the sustainability criteria and prevent fishing zones to be

AM\1225089EN.docx 279/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN established where vulnerable marine ecosystems have been found to exist;

Or. en

Amendment 559 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fish populations must be subject to maximum sustainable should be restored to levels that can yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal produce maximum sustainable yield, fishing practices and the elimination of by- exhibit a population age and size catches of sensitive species; distribution indicative of a healthy stock and are managed in line with an ecosystem based approach, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices, the elimination of by-catches of sensitive species and minimisation of damages to seabed habitats;

Or. en

Amendment 560 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that an ecosystem based must be subject to maximum sustainable management should be implemented, yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal restoring and maintaining all fish fishing practices and the elimination of by- populations above biomass levels capable catches of sensitive species; of producing maximum sustainable yield (MSY), with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices, elimination of by-catches of sensitive species and minimization of damage to seabed and benthic ecosystems;

PE680.715v02-00 280/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 561 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, and calls for greater support fishing practices and the elimination of by- for partner countries for sustainable catches of sensitive species; fishing and zero tolerance of illegal, undeclared and unregulated fishing practices and the elimination of by-catches of sensitive species;

Or. fr

Amendment 562 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, or to maximum economic fishing practices and the elimination of by- sustainable yield levels where possible, catches of sensitive species; especially in the Mediterranean Sea; with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by-catches of sensitive species;

Or. en

Amendment 563 Tudor Ciuhodaru

AM\1225089EN.docx 281/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by- fishing practices and the elimination of by- catches of sensitive species; catches of sensitive species, including, where applicable, severe penalties for those found in breach of the relevant bans;

Or. ro

Amendment 564 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that no fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable may exceed the level set by the consistent yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal application of the precautionary principle, fishing practices and the elimination of by- but should remain below it, with zero catches of sensitive species; tolerance of illegal fishing practices and the elimination of by-catches of sensitive species;

Or. cs

Amendment 565 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all fishing activities must be subject to maximum sustainable must be subject to maximum sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal

PE680.715v02-00 282/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN fishing practices and the elimination of by- fishing practices and the elimination of by- catches of sensitive species; catches of sensitive species as well as capture of fish to feed carnivorous farmed fish;

Or. en

Amendment 566 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Stresses that all fishing activities 11. Stresses that all commercial fishing must be subject to maximum sustainable activities must be subject to maximum yield levels, with zero tolerance of illegal sustainable yield levels, with zero tolerance fishing practices and the elimination of by- of illegal fishing practices and by-catches catches of sensitive species; of sensitive species which should be avoided and reduced, as far as possible;

Or. en

Amendment 567 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Recalls that the EU is committed to full recovery of marine life; calls on the Commission to halt ocean degradation and enhance ocean resilience and biodiversity by presenting an ambitious Action Plan to conserve fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems by 2021; expresses particular concern about the conservation status of migratory fish, many species of which are threatened with extinction; stresses therefore that increased efforts must be put into their protection and restoring

AM\1225089EN.docx 283/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN their numbers to healthy and sustainable levels;

Or. en

Amendment 568 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Stresses that any increase in aquaculture production should be based on extensive low trophic production such as algae, bivalves and pond-fish systems which provide ecosystem services, have lower carbon emissions and can reduce pressure on terrestrial and marine resources and biodiversity, and away from intensively reared farmed fish which are dependent on inefficient use of marine and terrestrial resources and produce higher carbon emissions;

Or. en

Amendment 569 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Further calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure full and effective implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/23361a to close areas to protect Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems, including seamounts, where they are known or likely to occur in the deep sea; ______

PE680.715v02-00 284/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 1a OJ L 354, 23.12.2016, p. 1

Or. en

Amendment 570 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Further calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure full and effective implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/23361a to close areas to protect Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems, including seamounts, where they are known or likely to occur in the deep sea; ______1a OJ L 354, 23.12.2016, p. 1)

Or. en

Amendment 571 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Further calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure full and effective implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 to close areas to protect Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems, including seamounts, where they are known or likely to occur in the deep sea;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 285/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 572 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Underlines that the achievement of a protection objective through a conservation figure (percentage) has lower importance, than the quality of protection zones that are established, which really cover an area with an ecological value;

Or. en

Amendment 573 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Highlights that certain biodiversity hotspots in the European Union are in a critical state such as the Mediterranean area and that preservation and restoration efforts, notably at regional level, should be intensified;

Or. en

Amendment 574 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 286/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 11a. Demands that the Council of the European Union proactively make public all documents related to the adoption of total allowable catch (TAC) regulations, in line with the European Ombudsman’s recommendation in case 640/2019/FP;

Or. en

Amendment 575 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Calls on the Commission to require ecosystem impact assessments of all fishing activities including on the marine ecosystem’s capacity to mitigate and adapt to climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 576 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Calls on the Commission to require ecosystem impact assessments of all fishing activities including incorporating adaptation and mitigation of climate change;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 287/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 577 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Emphasises the importance of the role of the Member States in controlling their Exclusive Economic Zones and reaffirms Member States’ sovereignty in their waters;

Or. fr

Amendment 578 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11a. Reiterates its call for full implementation of the CFP with the aim of restoring and maintaining fish populations above biomass levels capable of producing MSY;

Or. en

Amendment 579 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Calls for a Fisheries Action plan to support productive, resilient fish populations by including precautionary buffers for climate change when setting fishing limits; environmental impact

PE680.715v02-00 288/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN assessments of fishing activities that include considerations such as impacts on the food web, on non-target and associated species, protected species, physical disturbance, and the ecosystem’s capacity to mitigate or adapt to climate change; increased measures to minimise non-target bycatch; a clear and transparent set of environmental and social criteria for allocation of fishing quotas to maximise benefits for the environment and coastal communities; a drastic improvement in the control of fishing activities, including a transition to mandatory remote electronic monitoring systems (REM) for all fleets;

Or. en

Amendment 580 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Recalls that the EU is committed to full recovery of marine life; calls on the Commission to halt ocean degradation and to address ocean eutrophication and acidification by presenting an ambitious action plan to conserve fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems by 2021;

Or. en

Amendment 581 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 289/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Stresses the importance of continuing and stepping up the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, fisheries control and penalties for associated criminal practices, given that intrinsically polluting and illegal activities contribute to the deterioration of the marine environment;

Or. en

Amendment 582 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Calls on the Commission to require science-based ecosystem impact assessments of all fishing activities, including incorporating adaptation and mitigation of climate change as well as prey-predator interactions;

Or. en

Amendment 583 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11b. Calls on the Commission to propose legislative measures to define and prohibit supertrawlers from engaging in fishing related activity in EU waters;

PE680.715v02-00 290/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 584 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11c. Stresses that, as identified by the 2019 IPBES Global Assessment Report1a and the IPBES 2020 workshop report on biodiversity and pandemics2a both the legal and illegal trade in and use of wildlife significantly contributes to biodiversity decline, and that the destruction of natural habitats and the exploitation of wildlife are linked to the emergence and spread of infectious diseases; Calls on the Commission, in order to help reduce the risk of future emergence of disease and zoonoses, to adopt preventive legislation to strictly regulate the legal wildlife trade; ______1a IPBES (2019): Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2a IPBES (2020) Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

Or. en

Amendment 585 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 291/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11c. Recalls the need for a holistic approach to the conservation of migratory species; urges the Commission to present an ambitious Action Plan to conserve fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems by 2021 that ensures the conservation of highly and sensitive migratory species from fisheries bycatch;

Or. en

Amendment 586 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11c. Recalls the EU’s commitment to support and promote the recovery of marine life; calls on the Commission to put an end to ocean degradation by presenting an ambitious European Action Plan by 2021 with the goal to conserve fish resources and safeguard the various marine ecosystems in the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 587 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11c. Calls for a strategy for a reduction in the use of fishmeal and fishoil made from purpose-caught wild fish;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 292/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 588 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11d. Notes the critical importance of whale populations to marine ecosystems and emphasises these cetaceans’ vital role in carbon sequestration and mitigating climate change; calls on the EU Member States to urge the International Whaling Commission (IWC) to formally address Norway’s commercial whaling activities, which deplete whale populations; regrets Japan's withdrawal from the IWC and calls on the Commission, the EEAS and Member States to urge Japan to cease its whaling activities;

Or. en

Amendment 589 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11d. Calls on the Commission to adopt supplementary legislation that prohibits the importation, transhipment, purchase and sale of wildlife taken, processed, transported or sold in violation of laws in the country of harvest/origin;

Or. en

Amendment 590 Ville Niinistö

AM\1225089EN.docx 293/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11e. Highlights that wildlife cybercrime represents a huge threat to biodiversity, as no proper legislation exists to address it; that the growth of the online trade and its accessibility has allowed cybercriminals to gain access to a vast international marketplace; calls on the Commission to use the upcoming review of the E- Commerce Directive as a way to include this issue in its provisions and to prioritise tackling online wildlife crime as a key part of the Biodiversity Strategy and of the drafting of the post-2020 Action Plan Against Wildlife Trafficking;

Or. en

Amendment 591 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11f. Recalls its strong support for the continuation of the global moratorium on commercial whaling and the ban on international commercial trade in whale products; urges Norway and Japan to cease its whaling operations;

Or. en

Amendment 592 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 e (new)

PE680.715v02-00 294/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11e. Calls on the Faroe Islands to stop its controversial annual hunt on pilot whales, also known as the Grindadràp; calls on the European Commission and Member States to continuously engage with the Faroe Islands on this issue with a view of abolishing the practice;

Or. en

Amendment 593 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11f. Stresses that trophy hunting contributes to the exploitation of natural resources placing unsustainable pressure on endangered species, while failing to provide a significant source of income to rural people or contribute significantly to wildlife conservation; calls on the Commission to eliminate this unnecessary threat to biodiversity by banning the import of hunting trophies and supporting the provision of alternative sources of conservation funding to replace existing income streams that rely on trophy hunting, to emphasise the value of biodiversity and the ecosystem services it provides, and to encourage and reward investment in nature and the benefits that can be achieved by local communities through its non-consumptive and ecologically sustainable use;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 295/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 594 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11g. Underlines that the capture of fish to feed carnivorous farmed fish is a driver of marine biodiversity loss as well as a major animal welfare issue, and is therefore a practice that should be ended; emphasises that the suffering of wild fish at capture and slaughter needs urgent attention;

Or. en

Amendment 595 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 h (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 h. Notes that fur production, which involves the confinement of thousands of undomesticated animals of a similar genotype in close proximity to one another under chronically stressful conditions can significantly compromise animal welfare and increases their susceptibility to infectious disease, as has occurred with COVID-19 in mink; urges the Commission and Member States to acknowledge the risks posed to public health and biodiversity by the continued existence of fur farming, which is a non- essential industry; calls for Member States, where the practice is still legal, to take legislative action to ban fur production and for the Commission to ban the transport, import and export of live mink in the EU;

PE680.715v02-00 296/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 596 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 i (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 i. Calls on the Commission, in order to help reduce the risk of future emergence of disease and zoonoses, to adopt preventive legislation to strictly regulate the legal wildlife trade;

Or. en

Amendment 597 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 j (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 j. Urges the Commission to revise the Environmental Crime Directive and address the disparities in its application by Member States; calls for the inclusion of environmental offences, such as IUU fishing and illegal hunting, in this legislation; underlines the need for wildlife crime to be recognised as a serious criminal activity that should be heavily penalised, especially in the context of (transnational) organised crime;

Or. en

Amendment 598 Ville Niinistö

AM\1225089EN.docx 297/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 k (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 k. Highlights that, when successful, marine protected areas (MPAs) offer large socio-economic benefits, especially for coastal communities and the fisheries and tourism sector, and that MPAs can perform key ecological functions for the reproduction of fishstocks (providing spawning grounds and nurseries) and improve their resilience;

Or. en

Amendment 599 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 l (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 l. Calls on the Commission, in its implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management, to continue to support plans to improve selectivity and the survival of non-target species, to reduce the impact of fisheries on marine ecosystems, and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental impact that certain practices have on stocks, ocean biodiversity and marine environments by strongly limiting or prohibiting their use;

Or. en

Amendment 600 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 m (new)

PE680.715v02-00 298/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 m. Notes with concern the European Environment Agency conclusions that widespread physical disturbance of the seafloor continues in coastal European waters, in particular, as a result of bottom trawling;

Or. en

Amendment 601 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be specific environmental and restoration and that no activity in these conservation and restoration targets and areas should undermine this goal; calls on that no activity in these areas should the Commission to avoid future marine undermine this goal; calls on the renewable energy developments and Commission to avoid future marine bottom-trawling fishing within Marine renewable energy developments within Protected Areas; Marine Protected Areas and expanded bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas designated due to sensitive bottom habitats; further insists that biodiversity targets for Marine Protected Areas be based on best available scientific information, so targets are achievable and take into account the effects of climate change as species distribution can shift i.e. it is paramount to safeguard flexible management to ensure appropriate responses to climate change effects to ensure biodiversity targets are met in a changing world;

Or. en

Amendment 602

AM\1225089EN.docx 299/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; the Commission to avoid future marine recognises, however, that agriculture and renewable energy developments and forestry practices and other forms of bottom-trawling fishing within Marine human activity do not contradict the Protected Areas; conservation objectives of protected areas and high-diversity landscape features of agricultural land per se and even can be beneficial to their achievement; underlines in this regard that productive use must remain an option, taking into account specific local conditions; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 603 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to avoid all destructive renewable energy developments and human activity within European Marine bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas, including bottom- Protected Areas; trawling fishing or oil and gas exploitation; Calls on the Commission to take measures to minimize the impact of future marine renewable energy

PE680.715v02-00 300/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN developments in protected areas, notably by taking the conservation and restoration dimension into account from the design phase of projects and during the phases impacting the most marine ecosystems, such as project installation;

Or. en

Amendment 604 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and renewable energy developments and to bottom-trawling fishing within Marine prohibit bottom-trawling fishing within all Protected Areas; European Marine Protected Areas; calls on the Commission to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental impacts of fishing techniques such as bottom-contacting gear of fish aggregating devices (FAD’s) by prohibiting their use;

Or. en

Amendment 605 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Calls on the Commission to avoid areas must be environmental conservation future marine renewable energy and restoration and that no activity in developments and bottom-trawling fishing

AM\1225089EN.docx 301/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN these areas should undermine this goal; within Marine Protected Areas; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. it

Amendment 606 Esther de Lange, Jan Huitema

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in and restoration, but that in all cases it these areas should undermine this goal; should take account of economic, social calls on the Commission to avoid future and cultural requirements as laid down in marine renewable energy developments article 2(3) of the Habitats Directive as and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine well as regional and local characteristics; Protected Areas; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments outside the scope of the existing legislation and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 607 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Recognises the scope for allowing areas must be environmental conservation developments in sustainable economic and restoration and that no activity in activity in protected areas and bottom- these areas should undermine this goal; trawling fishing within Marine Protected calls on the Commission to avoid future Areas; marine renewable energy developments

PE680.715v02-00 302/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. it

Amendment 608 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration, which should also cover areas should undermine this goal; calls on sustainable forestry, and that no activity in the Commission to avoid future marine these areas should undermine this goal; renewable energy developments and insists, however, that tourism, hunting bottom-trawling fishing within Marine and any other recreational use of forests Protected Areas; should also be permitted in strictly protected areas; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. fi

Amendment 609 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Recognises the scope for allowing areas must be environmental conservation developments in sustainable economic and restoration and that no activity in activity in protected areas and bottom- these areas should undermine this goal; trawling fishing within Marine Protected calls on the Commission to avoid future Areas; marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

AM\1225089EN.docx 303/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. it

Amendment 610 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Calls on the Commission to avoid areas must be environmental conservation future marine renewable energy and restoration and that no activity in developments and bottom-trawling fishing these areas should undermine this goal; within Marine Protected Areas; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 611 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists further that priority for areas must be environmental conservation protected areas must be environmental and restoration and that no activity in these conservation and restoration and that no areas should undermine this goal; calls on activity in these areas should undermine the Commission to avoid future marine this goal; calls on the Commission to renewable energy developments and prohibit all destructive human activities bottom-trawling fishing within Marine within Marine Protected Areas, including Protected Areas; certain uses of fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear and fish aggregating devices (FADs), and oil and gas exploitation;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 304/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 612 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration, establishing highly- areas should undermine this goal; calls on protected zones aimed at restoring the Commission to avoid future marine habitats and fish stocks, and that no renewable energy developments and activity in these areas should undermine bottom-trawling fishing within Marine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid Protected Areas; future marine renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. ro

Amendment 613 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to ensure that future renewable energy developments and marine renewable energy developments bottom-trawling fishing within Marine are based on strict assessments of the Protected Areas; impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems and to avoid bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 614 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk

AM\1225089EN.docx 305/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and renewable energy developments and ban bottom-trawling fishing within Marine fishing with bottom-contacting gear and Protected Areas; other industrial and destructive activities within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 615 Alexandr Vondra, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration, based on site-specific areas should undermine this goal; calls on needs, and that activities in these areas the Commission to avoid future marine should not undermine this goal; calls on renewable energy developments and the Commission to put policies in place to bottom-trawling fishing within Marine prevent future marine renewable energy Protected Areas; developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 616 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

PE680.715v02-00 306/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in and restoration; calls on the Commission to these areas should undermine this goal; avoid future marine renewable energy calls on the Commission to avoid future developments and bottom-trawling fishing marine renewable energy developments within Marine Protected Areas; and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 617 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to phase out and renewable energy developments and ultimately ban future marine renewable bottom-trawling fishing within Marine energy developments and bottom-trawling Protected Areas; fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 618 Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on

AM\1225089EN.docx 307/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to avoid bottom-trawling renewable energy developments and fishing within Marine Protected Areas; bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 619 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Calls on the Commission, working areas must be environmental conservation together with Member States, to put and restoration and that no activity in forward criteria and guidance for these areas should undermine this goal; appropriate management planning of calls on the Commission to avoid future designated protected areas; calls on the marine renewable energy developments Commission to avoid bottom-trawling and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine fishing within Marine Protected Areas; Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 620 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to limit future marine renewable energy developments and renewable energy developments and bottom-trawling fishing within Marine bottom-trawling fishing within Marine Protected Areas; Protected Areas;

Or. es

PE680.715v02-00 308/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 621 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12. Insists that priority for protected 12. Insists that priority for protected areas must be environmental conservation areas must be environmental conservation and restoration and that no activity in these and restoration and that no activity in these areas should undermine this goal; calls on areas should undermine this goal; calls on the Commission to avoid future marine the Commission to avoid future marine renewable energy developments and renewable energy developments and non- bottom-trawling fishing within Marine selective fishing within Marine Protected Protected Areas; Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 622 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Welcomes the EU Offshore renewable energy strategy and urges the Commission to ensure adherence to the precautionary principle; stresses that future offshore renewable energy will need to fully respect biodiversity, in particular the objectives set out in the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Habitats Directive, and the Birds Directive, and take into account cumulative effects; furthermore, calls on the Commission to adopt a coherent common strategy for the phasing-out of current offshore oil and gas drilling activities by 2035;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 309/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 623 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Points out that forests are home to 80 % of the world’s land-based biodiversity and that deforestation, in particular of tropical forests, is continuing at a catastrophic rate; stresses that unsustainable agricultural practices are an important vector of deforestation and ecosystem degradation in the world; emphasises that agroecological development will play an essential role in preserving biodiversity and calls on the Union and Member States to promote this globally;

Or. fr

Amendment 624 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Recalls that according to the European Environment Agency, widespread physical disturbance of the seafloor occurs in coastal European waters notably as a result of bottom trawling; notes the existing restrictions on trawling in place in coastal waters of the Mediterranean Sea under Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006; calls on the Commission to expand such spatial restrictions in all coastal waters of the Union in order to protect sensitive habitats and support artisanal low impact

PE680.715v02-00 310/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN fisheries;

Or. en

Amendment 625 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Points out that the maintenance and development of open areas for permanent grassland and pasture should be made a priority in order to protect at- risk species of wild birds and pollinators, which are primarily connected with this type of environment, including by clearing woodland in degraded areas consisting of matter of little environmental value;

Or. it

Amendment 626 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Underlines the great potential that the Blue Economy can also bring to the conservation and recovery of marine resources, especially for the benefit of communities living in and around marine protected areas, and the leading role that Europe can play in the world in this sector, in accordance with the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 311/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 627 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Notes with concern the European Environment Agency's conclusions that wide spread physical disturbance of the seafloor continues in coastal European waters, in particular, as a result of bottom trawling; calls on the Commission to restrict bottom trawling in nearshore and coastal areas to protect the most productive part of our seas;

Or. en

Amendment 628 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Agrees that bottom trawling is one of the most harmful techniques for marine biodiversity, and calls on the Commission to include measures to phase out this type of fishing as part of the action plan that it will propose in 2021 to conserve fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems;

Or. cs

Amendment 629 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 312/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Calls for an in-depth study of protected areas throughout Europe as it is essential to conduct a recent scientific evaluation of the effectiveness and application of current protected terrestrial areas in order to prepare for possible new protected areas;

Or. fr

Amendment 630 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Stresses that the definitions and criteria for the sustainable use of forests and their restoration must be established while respecting the Forest Europe process and only made legally binding if voluntary action brings no result;

Or. fi

Amendment 631 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Emphasises that extensive use of freshwater and seawater aquaculture in order to maintain wetlands both inland and in coastal areas would serve to boost biodiversity;

AM\1225089EN.docx 313/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. it

Amendment 632 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Emphasises that extensive use of freshwater and seawater aquaculture in order to maintain wetlands both inland and in coastal areas would serve to boost biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 633 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

12a. Encourages the Commission to scale up collaboration especially for marine ecosystems and the designation of marine ecological corridors;

Or. en

Amendment 634 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 314/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 12b. Recalls that 1.6 billion people directly depend on forests for their existence, and that combating deforestation in partner countries is a major challenge that contributes to achieving several Sustainable Development Goals; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen and coordinate their efforts to support partner countries through partnerships devoted to sustainable forest management that recognise the essential role of local communities and encourage their participation in decision-making;

Or. fr

Amendment 635 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest deleted Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. fr

Amendment 636 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 315/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines the need for coherence Strategy must be fully aligned with the between the EU Forest Strategy, the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy, calls for the inclusion in the Nature in accordance with the Member States’ Restoration Plan of specific binding targets competence for forestry; calls for the for the protection and restoration of forest inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of ecosystems, which should also be specific targets for the protection and incorporated into the Forest Strategy; restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; notes with great concern that forests have increasingly come under pressure by events such as forest fires, bark beetle infestations, heatwaves and extreme drought; stresses that these events threaten unmanaged forests more severely and must be taken into account along with local conditions when setting protection targets, carefully balancing forest resistance and resilience requirements with biodiversity protection goals; underlines the important role of sustainable forest management in tackling the aforementioned threats as well as in increasing forest carbon sequestration, biodiversity and other ecosystem services;

Or. en

Amendment 637 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must have protection and Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; restoration of forest ecosystem as its calls for the inclusion in the Nature primary objective, be fully aligned with the Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy for the protection and restoration of forest and have a clear aim to increase the EU's ecosystems, which should also be natural sinks; calls for the inclusion in the incorporated into the Forest Strategy; Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of

PE680.715v02-00 316/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; urges the Commission and the Member States to take full account of the impact that increased use of biofuels has on deforestation and the threat it poses to both biodiversity and climate; therefore calls on the Commission to fundamentally reform EU bioenergy policies, i.e. by revising the Renewable Energy Directive, and exclude biofuels from support;

Or. en

Amendment 638 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; incorporated into the Forest Strategy; underlines the need to critically reconsider and revise the EU’s rules for the use of forest biomass for energy production in the framework of the Renewable Energy Directive to bring it in line with the objectives of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the EU’s target to become climate-neutral by 2050 at the latest;

Or. en

Amendment 639 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

AM\1225089EN.docx 317/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be based on the Biodiversity Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; firmly states that along with Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the strict protection, sustainable management Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding practices should also be acknowledged as targets for the protection and restoration of an appropriate solution for the forest ecosystems, which should also be management of areas with a very high incorporated into the Forest Strategy; value or potential for biodiversity and, particularly, those most vulnerable to climate change; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific provisions for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems as well as sustainable management, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 640 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy calls for the inclusion in the Nature with the protection and restoration of forest Restoration Plan of specific binding ecosystems as its core objective and targets for the protection and restoration of should increase the EU’s natural sinks forest ecosystems, which should also be while protecting, conserving and incorporated into the Forest Strategy; enhancing biodiversity; calls for the inclusion of specific binding targets for the restoration and subsequent protection of forest ecosystems in the legislative instrument for the new legally binding restoration targets, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

PE680.715v02-00 318/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 641 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be consistent with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 642 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be a stand-alone, holistic Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; and a coherence enabler for forest-related calls for the inclusion in the Nature policies, including the Climate Law and Restoration Plan of specific binding the Biodiversity Strategy; urges the targets for the protection and restoration Commission to address the forest-specific of forest ecosystems, which should also be measures of the European Green Deal in incorporated into the Forest Strategy; the Standing Forestry Committee with a strong mandate from the EU Forest Strategy; reiterates that Member States continue to decide, as highlighted in the views of the Council and the Parliament on the EU Forest Strategy, on policies on forestry and forests;

AM\1225089EN.docx 319/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 643 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Recognises that as per the Strategy must be fully aligned with the European Court of Justice’s ruling of Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; 19991a, EU measures on the protection of calls for the inclusion in the Nature forests is founded on the environmental Restoration Plan of specific binding targets legal basis (now Art. 192 TFEU); for the protection and restoration of forest Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy ecosystems, which should also be must be fully aligned with the Climate Law incorporated into the Forest Strategy; and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; ______1a https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:6199 7CJ0164&from=HR

Or. en

Amendment 644 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific targets geared for the protection and restoration of forest towards sustainable management and ecosystems, which should also be keeping forests healthy and suitably

PE680.715v02-00 320/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN incorporated into the Forest Strategy; resilient; calls for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy, without prejudice to the principle of subsidiarity;

Or. it

Amendment 645 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific targets for the for the protection and restoration of forest protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; incorporated into the Forest Strategy; notes that the gradual increase in forest area in the European Union is in stark contrast to the situation of growing deforestation in various parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America;

Or. es

Amendment 646 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Emphasises the strong links Strategy must be fully aligned with the between the Forestry and Biodiversity Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Strategies; stresses that deforestation is a calls for the inclusion in the Nature major cause of biodiversity loss; Restoration Plan of specific binding targets underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy

AM\1225089EN.docx 321/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN for the protection and restoration of forest must be fully aligned with the Climate Law ecosystems, which should also be and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the incorporated into the Forest Strategy; inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 647 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature stresses the need for the Forest Strategy to Restoration Plan of specific binding targets recognise the EU’s competences in the for the protection and restoration of forest area of protection of the environment, ecosystems, which should also be including forests; calls for the inclusion in incorporated into the Forest Strategy; the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 648 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines the importance of the Strategy must be fully aligned with the EU Forest Strategy as a holistic strategy

PE680.715v02-00 322/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; on forest related matters, which should be calls for the inclusion in the Nature fully aligned and coherent with the targets Restoration Plan of specific binding targets of the Climate Law and the Biodiversity for the protection and restoration of forest Strategy, including the Nature Restoration ecosystems, which should also be Plan of specific targets for the protection incorporated into the Forest Strategy; and restoration of forest ecosystems which should take into account the specific situation in the Member States in consultation with national authorities;

Or. en

Amendment 649 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of forest for the protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be ecosystems, coupled with short incorporated into the Forest Strategy; timeframes for their implementation, and for these targets to be incorporated into the Forest Strategy, too;

Or. ro

Amendment 650 Jytte Guteland

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature

AM\1225089EN.docx 323/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific targets for the for the protection and restoration of forest protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be ecosystems, whilst fully reflecting incorporated into the Forest Strategy; national and local circumstances, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 651 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be stand-alone; calls for the Climate Law and the Biodiversity inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the specific binding targets for the protection Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding and restoration of forest ecosystems, which targets for the protection and restoration of should also be incorporated into the new forest ecosystems, which should also be Forest Strategy; incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 652 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets Restoration Plan of specific targets for the for the protection and restoration of forest protection and restoration of forest ecosystems, which should also be ecosystems, which should also be incorporated into the Forest Strategy; incorporated into the Forest Strategy;

PE680.715v02-00 324/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 653 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Underlines that the new EU Forest 13. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be fully aligned with the Strategy must be fully aligned with the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding specific policy targets for the protection targets for the protection and restoration of and restoration of forest ecosystems, which forest ecosystems, which should also be should also be incorporated into the Forest incorporated into the Forest Strategy; Strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 654 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Stresses that the future EU Forest Strategy should be used as the overarching framework to coordinate all forestry policies, including biodiversity aspects, with sustainable forest management at its centre, taking due account of the prevailing roles of the Member States’ forestry policies and laws and of the principle of subsidiarity; stresses the important role of the Standing Forestry Committee and the Advisory Committee on Forestry and Cork as the main forums for exchanging information and providing the Commission with opinions, advice and skills on the different

AM\1225089EN.docx 325/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN policies and initiatives on forests and forestry; stresses the need to take into account the diversity and the different characteristics of European forests from an economic, social and ecological perspective;

Or. it

Amendment 655 Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Emphasises the balanced approach within the EU Forest Strategy post-2020; stresses the importance of multifunctional forests and forestry as a example of green infrastructure that provides indispensable ecosystem services (e.g. renewable material wood, biodiversity, soil and water protection, natural hazards management, and social functions like recreation) for people, the environment and the economy and delivers the preconditions for a smart green and regional economy; notes that forests can only achieve their full potential for climate and environment when they are sustainably managed; stresses therefore that close-to-nature forestry and hunting are compatible with the 10% strictly protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 656 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 326/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Underlines the importance of sustainable forest management for the health and longevity of forest ecosystems and the preservation of the multifunctional role of forests; highlights the potential of agroforestry to improve and boost ecosystem services and farmland biodiversity and for carbon sequestration, while enhancing farm productivity; notes that forests can only achieve their full potential for climate and environment when they are sustainably managed; stresses therefore the need to exclude forestry from the 10% strictly protected areas;

Or. en

Amendment 657 Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Notes the administrative measures proposed in the Biodiversity Strategy, especially the extension of protected and strictly protected forest areas, and the lack of clear definitions and detailed impact assessments; emphasises that the full involvement of Member States and stakeholders is needed and that national conditions should be taken into account in the development of key definitions important for the implementation of the strategy; stresses that more emphasis should be placed on the implementation of existing EU and national legislation;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 327/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 658 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Underlines that the new EU Forest Strategy must be stand-alone, holistic and a coherent enabler for forest-related policies, including the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; urges the Commission to address the forest-specific measures of the European Green Deal in the Standing Forestry Committee with a strong mandate from the EU Forest Strategy; reiterates that Member States continue to decide, as highlighted in the views of the Council and the Parliament on the EU Forest Strategy, on policies on forestry and forests;

Or. en

Amendment 659 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Stresses that the indicator of the share of sustainable forest management in the EU countries should be based on robust data and cannot be based on industry self-certifying its practices; calls for new and adapted indicators to be developed by an expert committee established for this purpose which will provide the basis for a definition of sustainable forest management and close- to-nature forestry, and be used for the purposes of policy and MFF programmes implementation and Recovery funding;

PE680.715v02-00 328/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 660 Silvia Modig, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Urges the Commission to revise the Renewable Energy Directive; stresses that the revised sustainability criteria of the Renewable Energy Directive must be science-based and aligned with the Paris Agreement, the Climate Law and the Biodiversity Strategy; insists that the use of whole trees and food and feed crops for energy production should at least be minimised;

Or. en

Amendment 661 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Emphasises that the growing trend of viewing forests from a predominantly economic perspective and of limiting their value to the timber that they produce, while ignoring their vital environmental and social benefits, poses a serious obstacle to achieving the objectives of protecting and guaranteeing biodiversity;

Or. pt

Amendment 662

AM\1225089EN.docx 329/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13a. Underlines the important contribution of multifunctional forests and the forest-based sector in achieving climate neutrality by 2050 by providing renewable alternatives to fossil-based resources and materials, including building materials that serve as long-term carbon storage;

Or. en

Amendment 663 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13b. Reiterates that Forest Europe confirms1a that the Pan-European indicators for sustainable forest management cannot evaluate the quantified rate of forest biodiversity loss and proposes that new or adapted indicators be developed; ______1a Forest Europe, 2015: Goals for European Forests, available at:https://foresteurope.org/wp- content/uploads/2016/11/MID_TERM_Ev aluatG2020T_2015.pdf

Or. en

Amendment 664

PE680.715v02-00 330/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13c. Highlights that an increase in harvest and consequently an increase in harvested area hampers both climate and biodiversity goals as well as the European indigenous peoples1a; considers that only circular and cascading use of forest and other biomass resources that does not compromise on scientifically underpinned protection and restoration action and climate action should take place in the EU; ______1a https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better- regulation/have-your- say/initiatives/12674-Forests-new-EU- strategy/F1300504

Or. en

Amendment 665 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13d. Reiterates its call1a to recognise the EU’s competences, responsibility and funds available in the area of forest protection and that the success of our external action and of our partners’ response to protect their forests depends on how effective and ambitious we are in relation to our natural heritage; Calls, therefore on the European Commission to assume and fully exercise its competence in the areas of forest protection and prudent and rational utilisation of forest

AM\1225089EN.docx 331/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN resources and jointly on the Commission and Member States to ensure the highest standards of environmental protection and consistency between the task of protecting and restoring forests both within the EU and in its external action; ______1a European Parliament's resolution of 16 September 2020 on the EU’s role in protecting and restoring the world’s forests (2019/2156(INI

Or. en

Amendment 666 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation proforestation, sustainable reforestation and the greening of urban areas; calls on and the greening of urban areas; calls on the Commission to ensure that these the Commission to ensure that these initiatives are carried out only in a manner initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives; biodiversity objectives; points out that the 3 billion trees target must not become a driver for replacing existing old-growth and biodiverse forest with species- impoverished new forestry plantations, as this would be counter-productive to the overall objective; considers that urban and peri-urban areas, including former industrial and rehabilitated land would particularly be suited for this, as well as agricultural land, especially agro-forestry land, creating corridors and connecting nature rich areas;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 332/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 667 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation sustainable afforestation, the and the greening of urban areas; calls on implementation of agroforestry, climate the Commission to ensure that these adapted reforestation and the greening of initiatives are carried out only in a manner urban areas, acknowledging Member compatible with and conducive to the States’ legal competences concerning the biodiversity objectives; implementation in the fields of forestry as well as urban and spatial planning; calls on the Commission to ensure that these initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 668 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Welcomes the commitment to plant planting initiatives should be based on at least 3 billion additional trees in proforestation, sustainable reforestation Europe; stresses however that the Union’s and the greening of urban areas; calls on tree planting initiatives should prioritise the Commission to ensure that these connectivity and be based on initiatives are carried out only in a manner proforestation, sustainable reforestation compatible with and conducive to the and the greening of urban areas; calls on biodiversity objectives; the Commission to ensure that these initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives and following the latest scientific guidance;

AM\1225089EN.docx 333/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 669 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation sustainable forestation, climate-adapted and the greening of urban areas; calls on reforestation and the greening of urban the Commission to ensure that these areas; calls on the Commission to ensure initiatives are carried out only in a manner that these initiatives are carried out only in compatible with and conducive to the a manner compatible with and conducive biodiversity objectives; to the biodiversity objectives, and to guarantee the necessary biological connections between the different areas (urban, rural and protected) in the territories concerned;

Or. it

Amendment 670 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Supports sustainable development planting initiatives should be based on of EU forests, including through proforestation, sustainable reforestation thoroughly planned afforestation; and the greening of urban areas; calls on stresses, however, that other approaches, the Commission to ensure that these such as proforestation, sustainable initiatives are carried out only in a manner reforestation and the greening of urban compatible with and conducive to the areas, may also play an important role; biodiversity objectives; calls on the Commission to ensure that these initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

PE680.715v02-00 334/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 671 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Jessica Polfjärd, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on, the proforestation, sustainable reforestation multifunctionality of forests, sustainable and the greening of urban areas; calls on reforestation and the greening of urban the Commission to ensure that these areas; calls on the Commission to ensure initiatives are carried out only in a manner that these initiatives are carried out in a compatible with and conducive to the manner compatible with and conducive to biodiversity objectives; the economic, social and ecological, including climate change and the biodiversity objectives related to Europe's forests;

Or. en

Amendment 672 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on the proforestation, sustainable reforestation multifunctionality of forests, sustainable and the greening of urban areas; calls on reforestation and the greening of urban the Commission to ensure that these areas; calls on the Commission to ensure initiatives are carried out only in a manner that these initiatives are carried out in a compatible with and conducive to the manner compatible with and conducive to biodiversity objectives; the economic, social and ecological objectives related to Europe's forests;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 335/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 673 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives must be based on clear proforestation, sustainable reforestation ecological principles, proforestation, and the greening of urban areas; calls on sustainable reforestation and the greening the Commission to ensure that these of urban areas, while ensuring that some initiatives are carried out only in a manner forest areas are kept untouched; calls on compatible with and conducive to the the Commission to ensure that these biodiversity objectives; initiatives are carried out only in a manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 674 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation proforestation, sustainable reforestation, and the greening of urban areas; calls on reversal of ecosystem degradation the Commission to ensure that these measures and the greening of urban areas; initiatives are carried out only in a manner calls on the Commission to ensure that compatible with and conducive to the these initiatives are carried out only in a biodiversity objectives; manner compatible with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 336/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 675 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Lídia Pereira, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation clear ecological principles, proforestation, and the greening of urban areas; calls on sustainable reforestation, greening of urban the Commission to ensure that these areas and agroforestry; calls on the initiatives are carried out only in a manner Commission to ensure that these initiatives compatible with and conducive to the are carried out only in a manner compatible biodiversity objectives; with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 676 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation proforestation, sustainable reforestation, and the greening of urban areas; calls on the promotion of agroforestry and the the Commission to ensure that these greening of urban areas; calls on the initiatives are carried out only in a manner Commission to ensure that these initiatives compatible with and conducive to the are carried out only in a manner compatible biodiversity objectives; with and conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. fr

Amendment 677 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 337/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation proforestation, close to nature forestry, and the greening of urban areas; calls on sustainable reforestation and the greening the Commission to ensure that these of urban areas; calls on the Commission to initiatives are carried out only in a manner ensure that these initiatives are carried out compatible with and conducive to the only in a manner compatible with and biodiversity objectives; conducive to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 678 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on proforestation, sustainable reforestation active and sustainable forest management, and the greening of urban areas; calls on reforestation and the greening of urban the Commission to ensure that these areas; calls on the Commission to ensure initiatives are carried out only in a manner that these initiatives are carried out only in compatible with and conducive to the a manner compatible with and conducive biodiversity objectives; to the biodiversity objectives;

Or. it

Amendment 679 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Stresses that the Union’s tree 14. Stresses that the Union’s tree planting initiatives should be based on planting initiatives should be based on the proforestation, sustainable reforestation principles of the new EU Forest

PE680.715v02-00 338/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN and the greening of urban areas; calls on Strategy; calls on the Commission to the Commission to ensure that these ensure that these initiatives are carried out initiatives are carried out only in a manner only in a manner compatible with and compatible with and conducive to the conducive to the biodiversity objectives; biodiversity objectives;

Or. es

Amendment 680 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14a. Stresses that biodiversity can be enhanced in keeping with a commercial aspect; recalls that European forests (managed within a financial context) play an important role in maintaining and improving biodiversity due to the increased knowledge of professionals in the sector; calls for a re-evaluation of the profession of forest warden, which is essential for the management of European forests;

Or. fr

Amendment 681 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14a. Requests that, once planting has been carried out, proper and continuous maintenance be ensured for the greening of urban areas, which should be undertaken using plant material that is adapted to the particular pedo-climatic, morphological and landscape features, in

AM\1225089EN.docx 339/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN addition to guaranteeing the maintenance of the area;

Or. it

Amendment 682 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14a. Stresses that the programme of Urban Greening Plans for cities with at least 20,000 inhabitants should be reviewed and expanded to include cities and densely urbanised areas with fewer than 20,000 inhabitants in order to reach more urban areas within the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 683 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14b. Emphasises that biodiversity protection should take place in cooperation with the territory’s stakeholders so that it adds to the final value of the products (wood of better quality, commercial enhancement of exports);

Or. fr

Amendment 684 Roberta Metsola

PE680.715v02-00 340/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14b. Stresses that such projects as proforestation, greening, reforestation and landscaping should prioritise indigenous flora, in order to create or expand nurseries of indigenous plants best suited for local ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 685 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14c. Emphasises that greening efforts should not merely focus on beautification of the particular space, but rather should make use of indigenous flora, maximise the amount of flora used and also promote the growth of wildflowers which are of great importance to pollinators;

Or. en

Amendment 686 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14c. Notes that Member States must shift towards sustainable forest management, emphasising the importance of the role forests play in carbon storage;

AM\1225089EN.docx 341/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. fr

Amendment 687 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14d. Calls for support for foresting and reforesting initiatives to be focused on integrated approaches in national and cross-border territories, taking into account local socio-economic conditions;

Or. fr

Amendment 688 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14e. Stresses that anthropogenically managed plantations can be valuable in terms of biodiversity, particularly at sites outside of forests; emphasises that, in some cases, human work does allow for improvements in the potential biodiversity index (PBI) and can positively influence the soil and subsoil regeneration cycle;

Or. fr

Amendment 689 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

PE680.715v02-00 342/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to deleted urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains;

Or. it

Amendment 690 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains and land- neutral trade chains; given the link between deforestation and the emergence of (novel) pathogens, suggests that a major effort be done to retain intact forest cover in tropical countries, and that trade policy should enable legally binding tools to tackle the impact of the EU as the consumer of goods and materials affecting forests worldwide;

Or. en

Amendment 691 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to

AM\1225089EN.docx 343/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains; is of the opinion that the new EU legal framework should prevent the entry into the EU single market commodities that have contributed to deforestation as described in the resolution of 22 October 2020 with recommendations to the Commission on an EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation;

Or. en

Amendment 692 Alessandra Moretti

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains; calls for future policies that highlight the strategic role of forests and related supply chains and for strenuous efforts to promote research and innovation in these sectors;

Or. it

Amendment 693 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal

PE680.715v02-00 344/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains; calls for future policies that highlight the strategic role of forests and related supply chains and for strenuous efforts to promote research and innovation in these sectors;

Or. it

Amendment 694 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Stresses that voluntary measures urgently present a proposal for an EU legal and market-based mechanisms such as framework based on mandatory due labelling and 'Round Tables' are woefully diligence that ensures sustainable and insufficient to stop deforestation; calls on deforestation-free value chains; the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework to halt deforestation based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 695 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains; calls on the Commission to rapidly extend the

AM\1225089EN.docx 345/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN announced legal framework to other materials and products associated with biodiversity loss;

Or. en

Amendment 696 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable value deforestation-free value chains; chains that are free from deforestation, forest degradation, ecosystem conversion and degradation, and human rights violations;

Or. en

Amendment 697 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Reiterates its call to the urgently present a proposal for an EU Commission to present an impact assessed legal framework based on mandatory due proposal to take action favouring the diligence that ensures sustainable and restoration of forests globally and for deforestation-free value chains; sustainable and deforestation-free value chains, while ensuring competitiveness of EU based businesses, especially SMEs;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 346/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 698 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence for large undertakings that deforestation-free value chains; ensures sustainable value chains, taking into account the heterogeneous conditions in the Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 699 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal consider a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains based on a deforestation-free value chains; thorough impact assessments taking into account different options;

Or. en

Amendment 700 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 347/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable, free of deforestation-free value chains; ecosystem degradation and deforestation- free value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 701 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation and ecosystems deterioration free value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 702 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 348/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 703 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal present, after an impact assessment, a framework based on mandatory due proposal for an EU legal framework based diligence that ensures sustainable and on due diligence that ensures sustainable deforestation-free value chains; and deforestation-free value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 704 Ondřej Knotek, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due framework that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains which deforestation-free value chains; should also apply to third countries;

Or. en

Amendment 705 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Calls on the Commission to 15. Calls on the Commission to urgently present a proposal for an EU legal urgently present a proposal for a legal framework based on mandatory due framework based on mandatory due

AM\1225089EN.docx 349/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN diligence that ensures sustainable and diligence that ensures sustainable and deforestation-free value chains; deforestation-free value chains;

Or. en

Amendment 706 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15a. Underlines the need to reduce the contact between wildlife and livestock, as well as wildlife and humans; believes that a trade ban on wild animals and restrictions on the trade of animals such as pets, fur and medicine, as well as a Positive List of allowed species, should be considered to counter the effects of a lack of health checks and limited international regulations; considers that in addition, to reduce the spread to zoonotic diseases through trade and to preserve wild species in global ecosystems, the EU needs more and better border controls; is of the opinion that transnational wildlife traffic crime should be addressed within multilateral efforts against organised transnational crime;

Or. en

Amendment 707 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15a. Calls on the Commission to analyse and assess whether the

PE680.715v02-00 350/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN instauration of a « price on nature », taking into account nature’s contribution to economic growth, would enable to limit and rationalise the exploitation and impact on species, ecosystems and therefore contribute to halt biodiversity loss;

Or. en

Amendment 708 Alexander Bernhuber, Dolors Montserrat, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15a. Regrets in this context the decisions taken by third countries that go in the wrong direction of the EU Biodiversity objectives for 2030 such as the Brazilian decision in 2019 to allow sugarcane cultivation in the Amazon region; calls for sanctions in case of such decisions;

Or. en

Amendment 709 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15a. Calls on the Commission to urgently put forward a proposal for an EU legal framework based on mandatory due diligence regarding wildlife trade (under the CITES Convention) and taking into account impacts on biodiversity loss in third countries;

AM\1225089EN.docx 351/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 710 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15a. Calls for a ban on the active substance glyphosate, due to its serious impacts on human and animal health, soil health, and ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 711 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15b. Welcomes the Biodiversity Strategy’s commitment to revise by 2021 the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking to step up efforts to combat the illegal wildlife both within the EU and globally; calls on the Commission to ensure that the post-2020 EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking is fully integrated into the 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, receives adequate funding and includes baselines and measurable indicators so that progress can be assessed and objectives delivered within a specified timeframe;

Or. en

Amendment 712

PE680.715v02-00 352/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15b. Recalls that biodiversity is threatened by climate change through natural disasters and extreme weather disturbances, including cyclones, storms, droughts, erosion, heat waves and fires, as well as rising sea level, rising sea surface temperature, flooding of coastal areas, and increasing ocean acidity, and that coastal regions and islands are particularly impacted;

Or. en

Amendment 713 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial and will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C marine species will decrease significantly scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to in a 1.5 to 2°C global warming scenario prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting and that these temperature increases will climate mitigation goals and in adaptation most likely be exceeded with the current strategies and to increase the protection of trajectory; highlights, therefore, the need to natural carbon sinks in the EU; prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU as a complementary measure to decreasing green house gas emissions; emphasises that removals by natural carbon sinks should be complementary and additional to the prioritisation of swift reductions of

AM\1225089EN.docx 353/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN direct greenhouse gas emissions, including when implementing the EU’s 2030 climate target;

Or. en

Amendment 714 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario, especially since current emission prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting trajectories, both at EU and global level, climate mitigation goals and in adaptation mean that these temperature increases strategies and to increase the protection of will most likely be exceeded; reiterates, natural carbon sinks in the EU; therefore, the need to further significantly increase EU ambition in this regard, prioritising nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; underlines that the removals by carbon sinks should not be counted towards the 55% emissions reduction target, but instead be additional;

Or. en

Amendment 715 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 354/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise environmentally friendly and climate mitigation goals and in adaptation nature-based solutions in meeting climate strategies and to increase the protection of mitigation goals and in adaptation natural carbon sinks in the EU; strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU, while ensuring to use the full potential of biogenic resources in order to achieve the phasing-out of fossil fuels as fast as possible in order to achieve the objective of the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 716 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection natural carbon sinks in the EU; and sustainable management of natural carbon sinks in the EU, while ensuring that the full potential of biogenic resources is used in order to achieve the phasing-out of fossil fuels with a view to achieving the objective of the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 717 Pietro Fiocchi

AM\1225089EN.docx 355/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU, while ensuring that the potential of biogenic resources is fully harnessed so as to ensure the gradual elimination of fossil fuels in order to meet the objective of the Paris Agreement;

Or. it

Amendment 718 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; reiterates in this context that prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate change has now reached its peak climate mitigation goals and in adaptation of the last two millennia in terms of its strategies and to increase the protection of rate and magnitude; highlights, therefore, natural carbon sinks in the EU; the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. cs

Amendment 719

PE680.715v02-00 356/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase natural carbon natural carbon sinks in the EU; sinks in the EU, while ensuring the gradual elimination of fossil fuels in order to achieve the objective of the Paris Agreement;

Or. it

Amendment 720 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2 °C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2 °C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU in order to increase the co-benefits between biodiversity protection and the fight against climate change;

Or. fr

Amendment 721 Delara Burkhardt

AM\1225089EN.docx 357/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU; calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a binding EU target for natural carbon sinks;

Or. en

Amendment 722 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in prioritise sustainable management of all meeting climate mitigation goals and in resources in meeting climate mitigation adaptation strategies and to increase the goals and in adaptation strategies and to protection of natural carbon sinks in the maintain and strengthen carbon sinks in EU; the EU in line with the objectives and practices supported in the upcoming Common Agricultural Policy;

Or. en

Amendment 723 Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Grzegorz Tobiszowski

PE680.715v02-00 358/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU, including by taking them into account in setting the 2030 emissions reduction target;

Or. en

Amendment 724 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU including by the revision of the policy framework which represents undue pressure on these;

Or. en

Amendment 725 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

AM\1225089EN.docx 359/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Highlights the need to prioritise majority of the ranges of terrestrial nature-based solutions in meeting climate species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 mitigation goals and in adaptation to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the strategies and to increase the protection of need to prioritise nature-based solutions in natural carbon sinks in the EU, in line with meeting climate mitigation goals and in the principle of proportionality; adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 726 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2 °C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2 °C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting prioritise nature-based solutions and climate mitigation goals and in adaptation stakeholder knowledge in the territories in strategies and to increase the protection of meeting climate mitigation goals and in natural carbon sinks in the EU; adaptation strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. fr

Amendment 727 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

PE680.715v02-00 360/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial and will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C marine species will decrease significantly scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting therefore, the need to prioritise nature- climate mitigation goals and in adaptation based solutions in meeting climate strategies and to increase the protection of mitigation goals and in adaptation natural carbon sinks in the EU; strategies and to increase the protection of natural terrestrial and marine carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 728 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease if nothing is done to halt scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to climate change; highlights, therefore, the prioritise nature-based solutions in need to prioritise sustainable management meeting climate mitigation goals and in of natural resources in meeting climate adaptation strategies and to increase the mitigation goals and in adaptation protection of natural carbon sinks in the strategies and to maintain and strengthen EU; natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 729 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of both terrestrial

AM\1225089EN.docx 361/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C and maritime species will decrease scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise climate mitigation goals and in adaptation nature-based solutions in meeting climate strategies and to increase the protection of mitigation goals and in adaptation natural carbon sinks in the EU; strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 730 Cyrus Engerer

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial and will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C marine species will decrease significantly scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, prioritise nature-based solutions in meeting therefore, the need to prioritise nature- climate mitigation goals and in adaptation based solutions in meeting climate strategies and to increase the protection of mitigation goals and in adaptation natural carbon sinks in the EU; strategies and to increase the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 731 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in prioritise ecosystem-based solutions in meeting climate mitigation goals and in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the adaptation strategies and to increase the

PE680.715v02-00 362/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN protection of natural carbon sinks in the protection of natural carbon sinks in the EU; EU;

Or. en

Amendment 732 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Expresses its concern that the 16. Expresses its concern that the majority of the ranges of terrestrial species majority of the ranges of terrestrial species will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C will decrease significantly in a 1.5 to 2°C scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to scenario; highlights, therefore, the need to prioritise nature-based solutions in sustainably manage our natural resources meeting climate mitigation goals and in in meeting climate mitigation goals and in adaptation strategies and to increase the adaptation strategies and to increase natural protection of natural carbon sinks in the carbon sinks in the EU; EU;

Or. en

Amendment 733 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Calls on the Commission to assess the magnitude of expected changes on biodiversity by performing a sensitivity analysis of the responses of species geographical distributions to climate change and to support Member States to adequately channel these assessments into national policies; stresses that expected changes in abundance and distribution

AM\1225089EN.docx 363/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN (e.g. a potential northwards migration) should thus also be addressed in future reporting under the Nature Directives and taken into account within the context of the new Biodiversity Strategy for 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 734 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Recalls that protection of oceans play an indispensable role in halting and reversing loss of biodiversity, not only with regard to the ocean habitat themselves, but also due to oceans having an immense impact on the health of ecosystems everywhere on the planet; highlights further the essential role played by healthy ocean ecosystems in mitigating climate change; calls therefore for the restoration of marine ecosystems providing natural sinks and for their inclusion in effectively managed Marine Protected Areas;

Or. en

Amendment 735 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Calls on the Member States to adopt effective actions for climate

PE680.715v02-00 364/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN adaptation to prevent and fight forest fires and compensate their negative effects on the rural economy, biodiversity and the provision of ecosystems services; underlines the need to develop science- based fire management to tackle the effects of climate change in forests and recognises the capacity of agroforestry to increase biomass productivity, reduce the costs of forest maintenance and prevent forest fires;

Or. en

Amendment 736 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Calls for the new EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change, which is interlinked with disaster risk reduction and management, to promote the essential role of ecosystem-based solutions which foster biodiversity as well as initiatives that reduce vulnerability and global threats to the human population, livelihoods and animal welfare, and the environment, notably in lower-income countries

Or. en

Amendment 737 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Recalls the EU’s commitment to

AM\1225089EN.docx 365/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN fulfil the objectives of the Paris Agreement; calls on the Commission to end fossil fuel subsidies, including fuel subsidies to fishing vessels, which contradict the EU's climate objectives, distort competition, and perpetuate overfishing and overcapacity of the fishing fleet;

Or. en

Amendment 738 Cyrus Engerer

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Highlights the importance of conserving “Blue Carbon” and carbon rich ocean habitats because of their role in sequestering carbon dioxide, and the importance of improving adaptation through protecting the coast from erosion, and building the resilience of marine life and fisheries to climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 739 Teuvo Hakkarainen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Emphasises the critical role of the bioeconomy in tackling climate change in an economically and socially sustainable way;

Or. fi

PE680.715v02-00 366/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 740 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16a. Calls on the establishment of an Intergovernmental panel on ocean change;

Or. en

Amendment 741 Cyrus Engerer

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16b. Recalls that the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development starts in 2021, and calls on the Commission to take a leading role by investing in new scientific research that quantifies the value of fish populations and marine life in the ocean carbon cycle until 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 742 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16b. Highlights the need to maintain and improve the integrity of carbon rich

AM\1225089EN.docx 367/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ocean habitats (corals, seamounts, seagrass, tidal marshes) for improving carbon storage, coastal protection, shelter for sea life and resilience of marine species and fisheries to climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 743 Cyrus Engerer

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16c. Calls on the Commission to recognise restoring and maintaining sustainable fisheries as climate action.

Or. en

Amendment 744 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Nils Torvalds, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to 17. Calls on the Commission to present prepare a long-term EU action plan on a long-term EU action plan on climate and climate and biodiversity that improves biodiversity that ensures coherence and coherence and interconnections for future interconnections for future actions, and actions, and integrates commitments under formally integrates commitments under the the post-2020 Global Biodiversity post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework Framework and the Paris Agreement; and Nationally-Determined Contributions of the Paris Agreement; underlines the importance of creating a formal coordination structure as soon as possible, as well as better coordination of reporting, monitoring, assessment and review of both climate and biodiversity

PE680.715v02-00 368/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN plans in the future;

Or. en

Amendment 745 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and biodiversity that improves coherence and interconnections for future actions, and interconnections for future actions, and integrates commitments under the post- integrates commitments under the post- 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement; the Paris Agreement, including transforming animal farming to ensure animal densities stay within the carrying capacity of the land;

Or. en

Amendment 746 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to a long-term EU action plan on climate and prepare, as soon as possible, a long-term biodiversity that improves coherence and EU action plan on climate and biodiversity interconnections for future actions, and that has a clearly defined step-by-step integrates commitments under the post- process, that improves coherence and 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and interconnections for future actions, and the Paris Agreement; integrates commitments under the post- 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement;

Or. ro

AM\1225089EN.docx 369/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 747 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and biodiversity that improves coherence and interconnections for future actions, and interconnections for future actions, and integrates commitments under the post- integrates commitments under the post- 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, the the Paris Agreement; Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. fr

Amendment 748 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and biodiversity that improves coherence, interconnections for future actions, and interconnections and sustainable business integrates commitments under the post- models for future actions, and integrates 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and commitments under the post-2020 Global the Paris Agreement; Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 749 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 370/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and biodiversity that improves coherence and interconnections for future actions, and interconnections for future actions; integrates commitments under the post- emphasises the importance of 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and coordination with Member States; the Paris Agreement;

Or. fr

Amendment 750 Linea Søgaard-Lidell

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and biodiversity targets that improves interconnections for future actions, and coherence and interconnections for future integrates commitments under the post- actions, and integrates commitments under 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the post-2020 Global Biodiversity the Paris Agreement; Framework and the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 751 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to prepare 17. Calls on the Commission to prepare a long-term EU action plan on climate and a long-term EU action plan on biodiversity, biodiversity that improves coherence and including soil, that improves coherence interconnections for future actions, and and interconnections for future actions, and

AM\1225089EN.docx 371/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN integrates commitments under the post- integrates commitments under the post- 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and 2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement; the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 752 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Calls on the Commission to 17. Believes that the European Green prepare a long-term EU action plan on Deal should be the framework to improve climate and biodiversity that improves coherence and interconnections for future coherence and interconnections for future actions, and integrate commitments under actions, and integrates commitments under the post-2020 Global Biodiversity the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement; Framework and the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 753 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Underlines that the new EU Climate adaptation strategy must be fully aligned with the Biodiversity Strategy and the preparedness for natural disasters through the Civil Protection Mechanism; calls for the inclusion in the legislative instrument for the new legally binding restoration targets of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of ecosystems with the highest potential to capture and store carbon and to restore biodiversity and to prevent and reduce the

PE680.715v02-00 372/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN impact of natural disasters; calls for the important role of nature-based solutions in fostering biodiversity, and actions to reduce vulnerability of the population, economic activities, animal welfare and wildlife from natural disasters to be integrated into the Biodiversity Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 754 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Underlines that the new EU Climate adaptation strategy must be fully aligned with the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for the inclusion in the Nature Restoration Plan of specific binding targets for the protection and restoration of ecosystems with the highest potential to capture and store carbon; emphasises the important role of nature-based solutions fostering biodiversity and actions to reduce vulnerability of the population, economic activities, animal welfare and wildlife to natural disasters;

Or. en

Amendment 755 Alexander Bernhuber, Petri Sarvamaa, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Considers that sustainably managed forests and resulting wood-

AM\1225089EN.docx 373/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN based products are essential in achieving the UN SDGs and European Green Deal targets and in tackling climate change by strengthening carbon stocks in forests and wood-products and by facilitating material substitution; Emphasises that to ensure consistency, these benefits should be horizontally recognised in EU's forest- related policies, including those on biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 756 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the IUCN and the EEA, to present guidelines, definitions and strict principles of implementation and optimisation tools to clearly define NbS as biodiversity-inclusive and guide decisions on where to implement NbS to maximise nature connectivity, benefits and synergies between biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation and adaptation;

Or. en

Amendment 757 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 374/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 17a. Recognises the positive contribution from sustainably managed protected areas, especially on marine ecosystems, to climate adaptation through strengthening ecosystems resilience; urges Member States to reinforce the role and increase the number of protected areas networks in national climate adaptation strategies;

Or. en

Amendment 758 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Calls on the Commission to make immediate use of the possibilities for climate change mitigation and adaptation provided by the restoration of forests, wetlands, peatland, grasslands and coastal ecosystems and to integrate the preservation of nature into all relevant EU policies and programmes

Or. en

Amendment 759 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Irena Joveva, Andreas Glück, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Highlights that the substitution effects of wood-based products should be recognised as important in achieving the targets of the Green Deal and in increasing the carbon stocks in forests;

AM\1225089EN.docx 375/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN considers that sustainably managed forests can support long-term wood availability and enhance biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 760 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Highlights the precarious state of soil health in the Mediterranean region due to desertification, rising temperatures and the subsequent soil erosion and the loss of microorganisms and plant species which contribute to soil health which furthers leads to biodiversity loss;

Or. en

Amendment 761 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17b. Stresses the need for a system of identifying degraded and contaminated soil for restoration, of defining the conditions for their healthy ecological status, of introducing restoration objectives and parameters for monitoring soil health, whilst also recognising the role that composting can play to meet this objective, and in particular compost produced on a large scale that serves circular economy goals as a product of food waste recycling;

PE680.715v02-00 376/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 762 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17b. Stresses that the post-2020 global biodiversity framework should commit Parties to incorporate NbS that protect and restore biodiversity and ecosystem integrity into both National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs) and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) to meet the Paris Agreement;

Or. en

Amendment 763 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17b. Stresses that Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA), involving the conservation, sustainable management and restoration of ecosystems can help people adapt to the impacts of climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 764 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae

AM\1225089EN.docx 377/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17c. Stresses that despite growing consensus at the UNFCCC, the CBD and other relevant COPs on the need for integrated action at country and local levels to tackle both the biodiversity and the climate crises together, NbS are still absent in many national climate pledges and country strategies; considers that a multi-stakeholder Platform on NbS could help strengthen synergies across multilateral international conventions on biodiversity and climate change and enable the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals;

Or. en

Amendment 765 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Subheading 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Nature-based Solutions (NbS)

Or. en

Amendment 766 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Subheading 7 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 378/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Greening urban and peri-urban areas

Or. en

Amendment 767 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Subheading 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Species conservation prioritisation

Or. en

Amendment 768 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s targets of targets of reducing the use of more reducing the use of more hazardous and hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 chemical pesticides by 50 %, reducing %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % nutrient losses by up to 50 % which will and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by result in the reduction in the use of 2030, which should be made binding; fertilisers by up to 20% by 2030; stresses considers that the derogation envisaged in that those reduction targets need to be Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No accompanied by an increase in research 1107/2009 should be clarified and must and development of alternative plant only be applied for health and protection products and fertilisers as well environmental reasons; as application methods and technologies if the EU truly wants to become the front runner in terms of sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture; calls on the Commission to carry out an impact assessment and the Member States to offer farmers a tool box of alternatives

AM\1225089EN.docx 379/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN for plant protection and fertilisation in order to ensure the security of supply with high-quality and biodiversity-friendly produced food; calls on the co-legislators to take these targets duly into consideration in the upcoming legislative initiatives; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 769 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Calls on the Commission to targets of reducing the use of more propose legislation with a binding hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 commitment at EU level to drastically %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % reduce the use of synthetic pesticides by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 50 % by 2025 and by 80% by 2030 with 2030, which should be made binding; binding national contributions, with a considers that the derogation envisaged in view to phasing them out by 2035; calls Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No on the Commission to set ambitious 1107/2009 should be clarified and must baselines for these targets and to assign only be applied for health and individual Member States their fair environmental reasons; contributions to the Union-wide targets whereby each Member State’s 2030 target is the end point of a linear reduction trajectory defining annual reductions for the years 2021-2030; welcomes the Commission's targets of reducing the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030; insists that both of these targets should be made legally binding and increased in the long- term; deplores that the ban on all outdoor uses of three neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, clothianidin and thiamethoxam) is being systematically undermined by the derogation envisaged in

PE680.715v02-00 380/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009;

Or. en

Amendment 770 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Takes note of the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 %by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030; recalls that before any targets be considers that the derogation envisaged in made binding, a comprehensive impact Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No assessment on all aspects including food 1107/2009 should be clarified and must security and safety, social and economic only be applied for health and sustainability of agriculture in the EU, environmental reasons; generational renewal, food security and prices, farmland availability and prices and the potential risks of displacing biodiversity losses abroad by the replacement of local agricultural production with import should be conducted; adds that all targets should be market oriented; proposes to have target corridors to take into account the national circumstances and different baselines and to remain flexible for unforeseen challenges like crises or extreme weather situations; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified;

Or. en

Amendment 771 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

AM\1225089EN.docx 381/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of chemical hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 pesticides, the use of fertilisers and nutrient %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % losses by 2030; recognises that these and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by targets could have a significant negative 2030, which should be made binding; impact on the economic sustainability of considers that the derogation envisaged in the sector, on farmers’ incomes and on Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) food safety, and should therefore be No 1107/2009 should be clarified and subject to an impact assessment before a must only be applied for health and targeted reduction is set; takes the view environmental reasons; that farmers should be put in a position where they are able to use fewer products, or optimise their use, through greater investment and greater development in the areas of research, innovation and tools and precision agriculture techniques; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified so as to respond to farmers’ actual needs with regard to the most dangerous pathogens;

Or. it

Amendment 772 Alexandr Vondra, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Recognises the Commission’s EU- targets of reducing the use of more wide goals of reducing, by 2030, the use of hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 pesticides and fertilisers in order not only %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % to reduce nutrients losses, but also to and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by reduce contamination of waters and soil 2030, which should be made binding; with for example nitrates, which, inter considers that the derogation envisaged in alia, causes algae spread in rivers, lakes, Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No ponds, etc., thus severely compromising

PE680.715v02-00 382/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 1107/2009 should be clarified and must biodiversity; considers that this should be only be applied for health and accomplished by binding and environmental reasons; proportionate targets tailored to individual Member States’ practices; is of the opinion that nitrates present in the soil are best fixed by inter-crops (e.g. after wheat harvest, mustard is sown); therefore warns against leaving agricultural land completely abandoned (set-aside) due to increased risk of nitrates infiltration in waters and soil; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 773 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Takes note of the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of and risk from hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 chemical pesticides by 50 %, nutrient %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % losses by at least 50 % - resulting in a and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by reduction of the use of fertilisers by at 2030, which should be made binding; least 20 % - by 2030; calls on the considers that the derogation envisaged in Commission to carry out a comprehensive Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No impact assessment of all quantitative 1107/2009 should be clarified and must targets and their reciprocal influence only be applied for health and brought forward in the Biodiversity and environmental reasons; Farm-to-Fork Strategies before proposing relevant legislation; considers that while regulation by derogation should be avoided in general, Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 remains an important instrument to ensure farmers have access to effective means of plant protection; stresses, however, that it must only be applied under the scrutiny of the

AM\1225089EN.docx 383/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Commission and in strict accordance with Article 1(3) and (4) of the Regulation;

Or. en

Amendment 774 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses deriving from all and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by nutrient sources such as mineral and 2030, which should be made binding; organic fertilisers by at least 50 % by considers that the derogation envisaged in 2030, which should be made binding; Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No considers that the derogation envisaged in 1107/2009 should be clarified and must Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) only be applied for health and No1107/2009 should be clarified and must environmental reasons; only be applied for health and environmental reasons; stresses that urban areas and civil society, public authorities and business are equally affected by the reduction targets; recalls that these targets can only be achieved by ensuring support measures at farm level such as farm nutrition advisory services and by innovative farming solutions like precision farming both in line with the upcoming Common Agricultural Policy;

Or. en

Amendment 775 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 384/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides, the use %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % of fertilisers and nutrient losses by at least and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 50 % by 2030, which should be made 2030, which should be made binding; binding; considers that the reduction considers that the derogation envisaged in should be quantified following a Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) cumulative economic impact assessment, No 1107/2009 should be clarified and putting farmers in a position where they must only be applied for health and are able to use fewer products, or optimise environmental reasons; their use, through greater investment and greater development in the areas of research, innovation and tools and precision agriculture techniques; calls for clarity on the ever-growing world of new plant-breeding techniques (NBTs) in order to regulate their areas of application and prospective use, and thereby provide the necessary legal basis for their development in the field;

Or. it

Amendment 776 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s intention targets of reducing the use of more to reduce the use of more hazardous and hazardous and chemical pesticides by chemical pesticides by 50 % and nutrient 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by could lead to a 20 % reduction in the use 2030, which should be made binding; of fertilisers from green and mineral considers that the derogation envisaged in sources; calls for a detailed impact study Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) to be carried out, before any legislative No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must proposal is presented, which must be only be applied for health and based on sufficient scientific evidence and environmental reasons; data, and which must assess the impact of this reduction on the protection of biodiversity, food security and the relocation of certain economic activities outside the EU; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of

AM\1225089EN.docx 385/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. es

Amendment 777 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding; considers that the derogation envisaged in considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and only be applied for health and environmental reasons; environmental reasons; asks the Commission to: make regulatory risk data more transparent and accessible; strengthen research and education in alternatives to pesticides; stop all exports of crop protection products banned in the EU; and support the re-evaluation of pesticide registrations in developing countries in line with the FAO/WHO Code of Conduct;

Or. en

Amendment 778 Esther de Lange, Jan Huitema, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 386/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030 which may lead to a reduction in the 2030, which should be made binding; use of fertilisers by of 20 %,which should considers that the derogation envisaged in be made binding on the condition that Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No their effectiveness is established through 1107/2009 should be clarified and must impact assessments; supports the only be applied for health and implementation of adjacent legislation, environmental reasons; such as new breeding techniques, an efficient authorisation policy for low-risk products and the recognition of biostimulants to protect the EU food supply; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified;

Or. en

Amendment 779 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s targets of targets of reducing the use of more reducing the use of chemical pesticides, the hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 use of fertilisers and nutrient losses by at %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % least 50 % by 2030; acknowledges that and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by these targets could have a significant 2030, which should be made binding; negative impact on the sustainability of considers that the derogation envisaged in the sector, farmers’ income, and food Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No security, and should therefore be subject 1107/2009 should be clarified and must to an impact assessment prior to setting only be applied for health and any targeted reduction; considers that the environmental reasons; derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified so that the derogation meets the actual needs of agricultural operators to deal with the most risky pathogens;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 387/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 780 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Strongly welcomes the targets of reducing the use of more Commission’s targets of reducing the use hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 of more hazardous and chemical pesticides %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding; considers that the derogation envisaged in expects these EU-wide key commitments Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No to be translated into specific binding 1107/2009 should be clarified and must national values, which reflect different only be applied for health and starting points of Member States, as soon environmental reasons; as possible; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 781 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made legally considers that the derogation envisaged in binding; believes that intermediate Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No reduction targets should be set and 1107/2009 should be clarified and must coupled with a mechanism requiring only be applied for health and increased measures to be presented if

PE680.715v02-00 388/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN environmental reasons; intermediate targets are not met; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 782 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding; calls considers that the derogation envisaged in on the Commission to review Regulation Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No (EC) No 396/2005 on Maximum Residue 1107/2009 should be clarified and must Levels of pesticides (MRL) to incorporate only be applied for health and animal health and the environmental risks environmental reasons; as criteria of the legislation; considers this approach would be a way to ensure a fair treatment for EU farmers who endeavours to protect biodiversity as well as to ensure them a level-playing field;

Or. en

Amendment 783 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

AM\1225089EN.docx 389/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding and considers that the derogation envisaged in have an explicit connection with the Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No Chemical Strategy for Sustainability; 1107/2009 should be clarified and must underlines the link between the only be applied for health and Biodiversity, Farm to Fork, and Chemical environmental reasons; strategies in this regard; considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 784 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s targets of targets of reducing the use of more reducing the use of more hazardous and hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 chemical pesticides, the use of fertilisers %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be set on the basis of 2030, which should be made binding; impact assessments and scientific data so considers that the derogation envisaged in that they can also be implemented in light Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) of the requirements of the common No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must agricultural policy; considers that the only be applied for health and derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of environmental reasons; Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for agricultural reasons and assessed on the basis of health and environmental factors;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 390/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 785 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s targets of targets of reducing the use of more reducing the use of more hazardous and hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 chemical pesticides, the use of fertilisers %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be set on the basis of 2030, which should be made binding; impact assessments and scientific data so considers that the derogation envisaged in that they can also be implemented in line Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) with the requirements of the common No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must agricultural policy; considers that the only be applied for health and derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of environmental reasons; Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for agricultural reasons and assessed on the basis of health and environmental factors;

Or. it

Amendment 786 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Notes the Commission’s targets of targets of reducing the use of more reducing the use of more hazardous and hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 chemical pesticides by up to 50 %, %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % reducing the use of fertilisers and limiting and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by nutrient losses by 2030, in view of the need 2030, which should be made binding; to safeguard the production potential of considers that the derogation envisaged in EU farms; Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for agricultural reasons and assessed on the basis of health and environmental factors;

Or. it

AM\1225089EN.docx 391/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 787 Ondřej Knotek, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030 taking into account the differences considers that the derogation envisaged in between Member States, which should be Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No made binding including in relation to 1107/2009 should be clarified and must imports to the EU; considers that the only be applied for health and derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of environmental reasons; Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 788 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding in considers that the derogation envisaged in each Member State; considers that the Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of 1107/2009 should be clarified and must Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be only be applied for health and clarified and must only be applied for environmental reasons; health and environmental reasons;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 392/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 789 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030; considers that the derogation considers that the derogation envisaged in envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and 1107/2009 should be clarified and must must only be applied for health and only be applied for health and environmental reasons; environmental reasons;

Or. fr

Amendment 790 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030, which should be made binding; considers that the derogation envisaged in considers that the derogation envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and must 1107/2009 should be clarified and must only be applied for health and only be applied for serious health or environmental reasons; environmental reasons;

Or. cs

AM\1225089EN.docx 393/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 791 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Takes note of the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030; considers that proposals considers that the derogation envisaged in for restrictions and reductions should be Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No based on comprehensive and holistic risk 1107/2009 should be clarified and must evaluations rather than on arbitrary only be applied for health and targets; environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 792 Nils Torvalds, Billy Kelleher, Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Welcomes the Commission’s 18. Welcomes the Commission’s targets of reducing the use of more targets of reducing the use of more hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 hazardous and chemical pesticides by 50 %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % %, the use of fertilisers by at least 20 % and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by and nutrient losses by at least 50 % by 2030, which should be made binding; 2030; considers that the derogation considers that the derogation envisaged in envisaged in Article 53(1) of Regulation Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No (EC) No 1107/2009 should be clarified and 1107/2009 should be clarified and must must only be applied for health and only be applied for health and environmental reasons; environmental reasons;

Or. en

Amendment 793

PE680.715v02-00 394/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Calls on the Commission to establish a plan for the compensation of the loss of income of farmers, which may result due to the biodiversity targets set and the interlinked decline in production;

Or. en

Amendment 794 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Stresses that, in order to achieve the stated objectives, it is essential to find alternative solutions to ensure that farmers have access to a range of suitable, safe, effective and affordable tools, as well as access to the latest information and technology and the best advisory services; calls on the Commission, in particular, to encourage and promote alternative solutions to pesticides and fertilisers, ensuring sufficient investment for their research and development; calls on the Commission, moreover, to revise the legislation to allow swift adjustments to be made when authorising alternative products in order to get them onto the market quickly;

Or. it

AM\1225089EN.docx 395/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 795 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Welcomes the decision to revise the directive on the sustainable use of pesticides and the reduction targets for pesticides and nutrient losses; emphasises the importance of holistic and circular approaches, such as agro ecological practices; insists that each Member State should establish robust measures to reduce the need for pesticides and fertilisers, accompanied by well-defined support ensuring accountability at all levels to help reach these objectives; reiterates its call for the translation into legislation of the above objectives and calls on the Commission to clarify how it will deal with individual Member States’ contributions to Union-wide targets and to clarify the baselines for these targets;

Or. en

Amendment 796 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Subheading 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Expresses its concern over the burden of synthetic chemicals in the air, water and soil on the environment and that according to the EEA this burden is unlikely to decrease due to projected increase in chemical production, continued emissions of persistent and hazardous chemicals, including EDCs, flame retardants or PFAS, and their

PE680.715v02-00 396/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN combined effects; highlights therefore the urgent need to reduce the pressures from all sources of pollution, among others by reducing the use of hazardous chemicals, stricter risk managements measures and transition towards the zero-pollution ambition and use of chemicals sustainable and safe by design;

Or. en

Amendment 797 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Welcomes the inclusion of urban and peri-urban areas; stresses that the simple development of Urban Greening Plans for cities is too unambitious compared to the clearly formulated targets for the agricultural sector; calls on the Commission to formulate ambitious and binding targets for urban areas such as a reduction of mowing of urban green spaces as well as on cutting hedges and trees during the bird breeding and rearing season, minimum share of green roofs on new buildings and the reduction of the use of plant protection products and fertilisers on areas that are not used for food production, etc.;

Or. en

Amendment 798 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 397/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Underlines that in order to achieve substantial reductions in pesticide use and risk, not only safer alternatives must become available to ensure the availability of a functioning plant protection toolbox and more efficient use must be facilitated by innovative tools such as digital and precision farming, but there is also a need for more resistant varieties that require less input to secure stable yields; stresses the importance of new innovative breeding techniques for making such varieties and calls on the Commission to propose a regulatory framework in this regard;

Or. en

Amendment 799 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Takes the view that a reduction in plant protection chemicals should be accompanied by a clear framework that would allow for the development and use of innovative technologies, including biotechnologies, provided that they are safe for consumers and the environment and widely accessible to farmers; calls for clarity on the ever-growing world of new plant-breeding techniques (NBTs) in order to regulate their areas of application and prospective use and thereby provide the necessary legal basis for their development in the field;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 398/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 800 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Stresses that integrated pest management (IPM) is only possible when farmers have adequate and enough resources; therefore stresses the need to come up with an innovation and substitution principle for IPM, meaning that before a substance/product is removed from the market, the Commission needs to be sure that adequate alternatives are available, to ensure that farmers have access to an adequate toolbox of safe, effective and affordable solutions, as well as access to the latest knowledge, technology and the best advisory services;

Or. en

Amendment 801 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has committed itself to ensuring that, from the outset, the national strategic plans for agriculture reflect an increased level of ambition to reduce significantly the use and risk of chemical pesticides, as well as the use of fertilisers and antibiotics; recalls the need to shift to high biodiversity, agroecological systems, through ecosystem-based solutions like integrated pest management, crop rotation with

AM\1225089EN.docx 399/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN legumes, and other organic farming practices;

Or. en

Amendment 802 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Emphasises that, to achieve the target of reducing nutrient losses by 50 % by 2030, the CAP strategic plans, particularly the eco-schemes, should propose solutions for optimising efficient use of nutrients; highlights that precision farming and specialised advisory services are key to achieving a balanced use of fertilisers;

Or. es

Amendment 803 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Calls for pesticides and chemicals to be replaced within timeframes subject to the availability of alternative tools for the protection of plants and animals; stresses that these tools need to be available and that, if removed, must in all cases be replaced with tools that are equally as effective and cost-efficient;

Or. it

PE680.715v02-00 400/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 804 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Calls for pesticides and chemicals to be replaced within timeframes subject to the availability of alternative tools for the protection of plants and animals; stresses that these tools need to be available and that, if removed, must in all cases be replaced with tools that are equally as effective and cost-efficient;

Or. it

Amendment 805 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Expresses concern that 80% of urban sewage discharged into sea basins such as the Mediterranean Sea is untreated leading to negative impacts on marine biodiversity and human health; calls on the Commission to ensure compliance with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and Water Framework Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 806 Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 401/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Opposes the reauthorisation of the active substance glyphosate after 31 December 2022; calls on all Member States to carry out the relevant preparatory work to provide all farmers with viable alternative solutions after the ban of glyphosate;

Or. en

Amendment 807 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Regrets that the assessment of the impacts of chemicals on the environment and biodiversity tends to be underestimated and undervalued in the socio-economic analysis during the authorisation process under REACH; is concerned by the continuous use and authorisation of hazardous chemicals with negative impacts on the environment or in cases of missing safety data on environmental endpoints; calls on the Commission, in its role as risk manager, to take greater consideration of the impacts of chemicals, including their chronic and long-term effects, on the environment and biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 808 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk

PE680.715v02-00 402/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Notes that approximately 80% of marine litter is land-based and that 150 million tonnes of plastics have accumulated in our oceans, while 4.6-12.7 million tonnes are added every year; calls on the Commission to ensure a swift implementation of all 35 actions of the new Circular Economy Action Plan - one of the main blocks of the European Green Deal, to address this; recalls that the EU has committed itself to lead efforts on reaching a global agreement on plastics which must address the whole lifecycle of plastics and represent a fundamental change to the plastics economy;

Or. en

Amendment 809 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Calls on the Commission to include in its revision of the implementing measures of the Market Authorisation for Pesticides provisions to respect the EU- wide objective of pesticides reduction set by the Biodiversity Strategy, in particular by including environmental provisions in the criteria to grant market access to a pesticides in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009; considers that when it is concluded by the EFSA that there is a high risk for the environment, an approval decision under that Regulation

AM\1225089EN.docx 403/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN should not be granted;

Or. en

Amendment 810 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Jan Huitema, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Welcomes the Commission´s proposal to reduce nutrient losses; stresses that a strategy to reduce nutrient losses should focus primarily on enabling farmers to increase efficiency of nutrient management and highlights the importance of innovative technologies and solutions in this regard; further calls for the strategy to consider the climate and environmental impact of different fertilisers;

Or. en

Amendment 811 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Stresses that any reduction of chemical PPPs must be accompanied by a innovation principle that enables the research, development and employment of new innovative techniques including precision farming and new breeding techniques; calls on the Commission to publish the study on the potential of new genomic techniques which should be the

PE680.715v02-00 404/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN basis for a proper regulatory framework;

Or. en

Amendment 812 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Expresses concern that 80% of urban sewage discharged into sea basins such as the Mediterranean Sea is untreated leading to negative impacts on marine biodiversity and human health; calls on the Commission to ensure compliance with the Marine Strategy Framework Directive and Water Framework Directive;

Or. en

Amendment 813 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Looks forward to reading the Commission’s study on the potential of new genomic techniques, which should ultimately lead to an appropriate legal framework based on state-of-the-art scientific expertise and evidence;

Or. it

Amendment 814

AM\1225089EN.docx 405/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Agrees on the need to maintain farmers’ incomes by using appropriate tools and secure methods to protect crops from pests and diseases as provided for by the Farm to Fork Strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 815 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18b. Underlines that European farmers play a crucial role in the protection of nature and make important contributions to biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 816 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18c. Notes that approximately 80% of marine litter is land-based and that 150 million tonnes of plastics have accumulated in our oceans, while 4.6-12.7 million tonnes are added every year; calls on the Commission to ensure a swift

PE680.715v02-00 406/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN implementation of all 35 actions of the new Circular Economy Action Plan - one of the main blocks of the European Green Deal, to address this;

Or. en

Amendment 817 Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18c. Welcomes the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy to reduce by at least 20% fertiliser loss by 2030 in the EU; calls on the Commission to work further on additional solutions to reduce the use of mineral nitrogenous fertilisers, in particular by working on its taxation or, at a minimum, by promoting a coordination of taxation efforts between Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 818 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18c. Is convinced that the Biodiversity Strategy needs to work with farmers to further increase contributions to biodiversity based on specific support for farmers from the MFF;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 407/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 819 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18c. Calls for authorisations for the approval of plant protection products to be undertaken at EU level in an effort to fully harmonise standards;

Or. it

Amendment 820 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18d. Notes that increased use of, and dependency on, pesticides comes at a high cost to farmers, both through the high input cost and also due to the loss in yields due to depleting soil and soil quality; notes that the traditional chemical pesticide approach is flawed because it is a biological inevitability that pest species quickly gain resistance to the active substance, leading to a chemical arms race in which the farmers and biodiversity are the biggest losers; notes that resistance has been rising, making pesticide use even less effective over the past decades due to systematic and repeated application of too much product, over too large areas; notes that to help avoid biodiversity crashes and pest resistance, a hierarchy of action should be followed, in line with the 8 principles of IPM found in annex III to Directive 2009/128/EC on the Sustainable use of

PE680.715v02-00 408/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN pesticides, whereby chemical pesticides are only used as a last resort after an alternative series of practices have been implemented;

Or. en

Amendment 821 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18d. Stresses that the Biodiversity Strategy should fully take into account the upcoming agreement on the CAP Strategic Plans and avoid additional legal burdens and uncertainty for farmers after the agreement of the new CAP;

Or. en

Amendment 822 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18e. Notes that high-biodiversity & high genetic diversity farming approaches such as agroecology are an effective way of reducing the risk of crop failure or pest attack, since clones and similar phenotypes are equally susceptible to the same shocks and pressures, such as pests and diseases, particularly in uniform and monocultural landscapes; notes that the profitability of agroecological systems can be greater than conventional systems and that they can be equally, if not more,

AM\1225089EN.docx 409/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN productive1a; stresses that long term food security cannot be ensured without the preservation and restoration of healthy, fertile and resilient soils and ecosystems; ______1a see, for example, meta-study by J.D. van der Ploeg et al., 2019. " The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe ", Journal of Rural Studies, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09. 003

Or. en

Amendment 823 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18e. Strongly underlines that the emergency authorisations of pesticides needs to be further allowed in order to ensure the security of supply within the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 824 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18f. Calls, in this regard, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure equal product and production standards and effective controls of the

PE680.715v02-00 410/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN agricultural products imported from third countries with a view to ensuring a level playing field for European food production and a high level of protection and underlines that the supply with high- quality foodstuff from EU farmers must be an overall target;

Or. en

Amendment 825 Alexander Bernhuber, Agnès Evren, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18g. Stresses the decrease of biodiversity due to light pollution; calls on the Commission to set up a strategy against light pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 826 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 h (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 h. Calls on the Commission to establish an EU-plan on planting useful trees in cities and urban areas; proposes that every second new planted tree should be contributing in being useful (e.g. fruit trees), which can furthermore contribute to increasing biodiversity in cities;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 411/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 827 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 i (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 i. Calls on the Commission to include public lawn and public green spaces in cities and urban areas similar to the proposed strictly protected areas targets, to help to increase biodiversity and the protection of pollinators in these areas;

Or. en

Amendment 828 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 j (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 j. Calls on the Commission to prepare an action plan on soil sealing of parking spots within cities and urban areas;

Or. en

Amendment 829 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 412/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 19. Strongly regrets the decline of deleted pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. it

Amendment 830 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of deleted pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 831 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Martin Hojsík, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Strongly regrets the decline of

AM\1225089EN.docx 413/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN pollinators, which are a key indicator of the pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; of the initiative; recalls its objection of 23 October 2019 as regards the assessment of the impact of plant protection products on honeybees5a and calls on the Commission and EFSA to ensure that the review of the Bee Guidance Document does not reduce the ambition of the previous Bee Guidance Document; notes that EFSA is designing its own modelization system, ApisRAM, which appears to be more in line with the biology of honeybees than BeeHAVE and less open to conflict of interests; insists that the 2013 Bee Guidance Document should be made operational for wild bees; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 832 Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Highlights the importance of pollinators, which are a key indicator of the maintaining and restoring high-diversity health of the environment; reiterates the landscape features in agricultural position expressed in its resolution of 18 landscapes for their value in terms of December 2019 on the EU Pollinators biodiversity and pollinators; strongly Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision regrets the decline of pollinators, which are of the initiative; a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; stresses the important role of beekeepers considering that the highest level of

PE680.715v02-00 414/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN pollination is provided by honey bees therefore the importance of their financial support is vital; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 833 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Strongly regrets the decline of pollinators, which are a key indicator of the pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; of the initiative; calls on the Commission to review the revised National Action Plans adopted under Directive 2009/128/EC and to take all possible measures to ensure that Member States adequately commit to pesticide use reduction targets and the necessary monitoring thereof; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 834 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 415/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Is extremely concerned about the pollinators, which are a key indicator of the decline of pollinators, which are a key health of the environment; reiterates the indicator of the health of the environment, position expressed in its resolution of 18 and stresses that this decline means not December 2019 on the EU Pollinators only a loss of biodiversity but also a threat Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision to food security; reiterates the position of the initiative; expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision of the initiative; ______5 Texts Adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts Adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. cs

Amendment 835 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Strongly regrets the decline of pollinators, which are a key indicator of the pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision Initiative5 and calls for an urgent science- of the initiative; based revision of the initiative; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. es

Amendment 836 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Strongly regrets the decline of

PE680.715v02-00 416/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN pollinators, which are a key indicator of the pollinators, which are a key indicator of the health of the environment; reiterates the health of the environment; reiterates the position expressed in its resolution of 18 position expressed in its resolution of 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision Initiative5; of the initiative; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 837 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Strongly regrets the decline of 19. Regrets the decline of pollinators, pollinators, which are a key indicator of which can serve as one of many indicators the health of the environment; reiterates the of the health of the environment; reiterates position expressed in its resolution of 18 the position expressed in its resolution of December 2019 on the EU Pollinators 18 December 2019 on the EU Pollinators Initiative5 and calls for an urgent revision Initiative5 and calls for a revision of the of the initiative; initiative; ______5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104. 5 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0104.

Or. en

Amendment 838 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 – subparagraph 1 (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the revision of the EFSA bee guidance, and the future

AM\1225089EN.docx 417/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN implementing acts, do not to lead to a level of protection for bees below that laid down in the EFSA bee guidance from 2013;

Or. en

Amendment 839 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19a. Calls on the Commission to draw up a new proposal to develop pollinators’ habitats, harnessing the ecosystem services provided by the relevant sectoral operators and the benefits that they bring, by providing farmers with appropriate advice that, in exchange for fair compensation, allows plant species to be planted to boost pollinators’ health and crop diversification on farmland to improve the pollination service and preserve biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 840 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19a. Reiterates its opposition to a Review of the Guidance Document for the risk assessment for bees which lowers the ambition of the Guidance document from 2013 based on which the three neonicotinoid pesticides were banned in the EU; calls on the Member States to

PE680.715v02-00 418/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN approve a risk-assessment methodology ensuring the highest-possible level of protection of pollinators, including a wide range of wild pollinators;

Or. en

Amendment 841 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19a. Points out that in a Special Report on the protection of wild pollinators in the European Union, the European Court of Auditors notes that the Commission’s initiatives have not borne fruit; emphasises the importance of coordinated action by Member States on this crucial issue for the future of biodiversity and ecosystems;

Or. fr

Amendment 842 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19a. Recalls its resolution of 16 January 2019 on the Union’s authorisation procedure for pesticides1a , and expects the Commission and Member States to address all its calls without unnecessary delay in order to reduce the risks of active substances to biodiversity and environment;

AM\1225089EN.docx 419/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2019)0023

Or. en

Amendment 843 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19a. Strongly regrets that the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Bee Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees has not been formally adopted by Member State governments in the Standing Committee on Plant, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF);

Or. en

Amendment 844 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19b. Expresses serious concern that as part of the current review of the 2013 Bee Guidance Document by the European Food Safety Authority, at a workshop on 30 June 2020 and again at a Standing Committee on Plant, Animals, Food and Feed meeting on 16/17 July 2020, a majority of Member States opted to support Approach 2 for the protection of pollinators, which is based on the BEEHAVE model, uses a flawed method of calculating natural background colony size, ignores solitary bees, and only briefly

PE680.715v02-00 420/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN addresses bumblebees;

Or. en

Amendment 845 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19b. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that the protection of Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees, within the review process of the Bee Guidance Document does not fall below the level of protection intended by the 2013 EFSA Bee Guidance and that it addresses both toxic and chronic toxicity as well as larvae toxicity and other species; calls for increased transparency of the review process;

Or. en

Amendment 846 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19b. Recalls that a global evaluation report published in 2019 assessing the situation of insects worldwide confirmed that the number of insects generally appeared to be following a downward trend; recalls that butterflies and bees, in particular, are among the species most affected; notes that 35 % of our food resources depend on insects and 80 % on bees;

AM\1225089EN.docx 421/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. fr

Amendment 847 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address noise and light pollution; noise and light pollution; including underwater noise from shipping and other maritime activities and promote the usage of best available technologies to reduce these pollutants, and light pollution; conversely stresses the need for the Biodiversity Strategy to include dedicated measures targeted at reducing pollution with a direct impact on biodiversity’s health and loss such as plastic and microplastic, noise, light, deep sea mining and chemical pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 848 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the upcoming Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also swiftly noise and light pollution; address underwater noise from shipping and other maritime activities, promoting

PE680.715v02-00 422/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the use of “best available technologies and best environmental practices” to reduce noise emissions; stresses the need for the Biodiversity Strategy to include dedicated measures to reduce plastic chemicals entering the food chain and threatening public health;

Or. en

Amendment 849 Ville Niinistö, Eleonora Evi, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address noise and light pollution; noise and light pollution and set an ambitious and binding 2030 reduction target on the use of outdoor artificial light at night given the adverse impact of light pollution on biodiversity; furthermore, calls on the Commission to propose guidelines on how artificial light at night can be reduced by Member States;

Or. en

Amendment 850 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives

AM\1225089EN.docx 423/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address noise and light pollution; noise and light pollution, including underwater noise from installations of renewable energy, shipping and other maritime activities and make it mandatory to use the best available technologies to reduce these pollutants;

Or. en

Amendment 851 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address noise and light pollution; noise, including underwater noise pollution, and light pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 852 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address

PE680.715v02-00 424/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN noise and light pollution; noise pollution in the marine environment and light pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 853 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, which should also address noise and light pollution; noise, including underwater noise and light pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 854 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Calls on the Commission and 20. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that the objectives Member States to ensure that the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully of the Biodiversity Strategy are fully reflected in the future Zero Pollution reflected in the future Zero Pollution Action Plan, which should also address Action Plan, noise and light pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 855

AM\1225089EN.docx 425/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Highlights that the loss of ecosystems and climate change can lead to a spread of invasive alien species and pathogens in new locations posing a threat to local biodiversity and ecosystems as well as human health; recalls that the loss of habitats forces many species to evade to areas populated by humans thus providing an opportunity for pathogens to pass between animals and people; recalls that this migration increases the risk of pandemics such as the current Covid-19 crisis;

Or. en

Amendment 856 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Deplores the initiative to ban combustion engines by 2035; points out that, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (EAMA), fewer than 1 % of European drivers were using electric or hybrid vehicles in 2019; recalls that electric engines are a source of pollution due to the extraction of rare metals, the necessary water consumption and the dispersal of polluting particles around the extraction points;

Or. fr

PE680.715v02-00 426/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 857 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Calls on the Commission to incentivise the development of precision farming and all those technological tools such as 5G that could help farmers in their transition to a more sustainable model; calls, further, on the Commission to amend the current legislation to take full advantage of the potential of drones in the aerial spraying of plant protection products;

Or. es

Amendment 858 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Highlights that diffuse pollution, such as treated or untreated waste water, or water that runs off from the urban or agricultural environment such as discharge of nitrogen and phosphorus threatens the marine environment with eutrophication due to the high concentration of nutrients, which contaminate extensively marine plants and wildlife, leading to the proliferation of ‘dead zones’;

Or. en

Amendment 859

AM\1225089EN.docx 427/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Calls on the Commission to promote the updating of studies on exposure to electromagnetic fields generated by energy and telecommunications infrastructures, in line with the latest technological developments, and to work with stakeholders to improve the quality and availability of relevant scientific evidence in the fields of biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 860 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Draws attention to the important subject of maritime pollution, in particular the accumulation of micro and nano plastics in the final point of ocean flows disturbing ecosystems and breaking food chains; thereafter, urges the Commission to take action to avoid any further biodiversity loss due to plastic pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 861 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 428/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 20 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20b. Notes that the correct implementation of the Nature Directives falls not only on Member States but also on the Commission, including the need for an assessment procedure, to enable the protection status of species in particular regions, to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached; without jeopardising the conservation objectives and requirements set within the Nature Directives, recognises that the flexibility of implementation approaches, which takes into account specific national circumstances, contributes to the reduction and progressive elimination of unnecessary conflicts and problems between nature protection and socioeconomic activities;

Or. en

Amendment 862 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20b. Stresses the need to increase knowledge about nano- and microplastic pollution and its effect on the environment; points out that this lack of knowledge is detrimental to policy-making and that more research is needed to understand this phenomena and develop ambitious measures;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 429/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 863 Christophe Hansen

Motion for a resolution Subheading 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Invasive alien species (IAS) Invasive alien species (IAS) and the spread of pathogens

Or. en

Amendment 864 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Subheading 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Species conservation prioritisation

Or. en

Amendment 865 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Subheading 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Deep seabed mining

Or. en

Amendment 866 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

PE680.715v02-00 430/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; highlights that the to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting exotic pet trade is one of the main threatened species on the EU list and to pathways of introduction of IAS, in reinforce prevention by introducing addition to posing serious risks to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the conservation of species, to animal health first import of non-native species and by and welfare, and to people's health adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; through the potential introduction and spreading of zoonoses; calls on the Commission to ensure that IAS affecting threatened species are included in the list of species of Union concern and to reinforce prevention by urgently adopting EU-wide white/positive lists of species permitted for import, keeping, breeding and trade as pets on the basis of a scientific risk assessment;

Or. en

Amendment 867 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to step up action and ensure proper threatened species on the EU list and to coverage of IAS affecting threatened reinforce prevention by introducing species on the EU list and to reinforce mandatory risk assessments prior to the prevention by introducing mandatory risk first import of non-native species and by assessments prior to the first import of non- adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; urges the Commission to urgently revise the listing processes, together with prevention, control or eradication plans for those

AM\1225089EN.docx 431/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN affecting critically endangered species as determined by science;

Or. en

Amendment 868 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to biodiversity in the EU and, in particular, reinforce prevention by introducing threatened species, and to reinforce mandatory risk assessments prior to the prevention by introducing mandatory risk first import of non-native species and by assessments prior to the first import of non- adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; native species and by introducing by 2030 at the latest a system of white lists that are more appropriate in terms of eliminating the introduction and establishment of non-native species into the EU environment and that reflect the precautionary principle;

Or. cs

Amendment 869 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to threatened species on the EU list and to

PE680.715v02-00 432/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN reinforce prevention by introducing reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; calls on specific risk management measures to be set up at EU level so as to obtain a common toolbox to effectively control newly identified threats;

Or. en

Amendment 870 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest, while also ensuring that the adopted white lists of non-native species respect the diverse ecological realities of the Union;

Or. en

Amendment 871 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission

AM\1225089EN.docx 433/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; promptly adopting white/positive lists of species permitted for import, keeping, breeding and trade as pets;

Or. en

Amendment 872 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; adopting, by 2030 at the latest, white lists that are mandatory and that apply to all Member States;

Or. it

Amendment 873 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Regrets that the list of Union concern represents less than 6 % of IAS concern represents less than 6 % of IAS present in Europe; calls on the Commission present in Europe; calls on the Commission

PE680.715v02-00 434/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting to ensure proper coverage of IAS affecting threatened species on the EU list and to threatened species on the EU list and to reinforce prevention by introducing reinforce prevention by introducing mandatory risk assessments prior to the mandatory risk assessments prior to the first import of non-native species and by first import of non-native species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest; adopting white or positive lists as soon as possible and by 2030 at the latest;

Or. en

Amendment 874 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Regrets that the list of Union 21. Calls on the Commission to ensure concern represents less than 6 % of IAS proper coverage of IAS affecting present in Europe; calls on the threatened species on the EU list, while Commission to ensure proper coverage of taking due account of the implementation IAS affecting threatened species on the EU costs for Member States and the list and to reinforce prevention by socioeconomic aspects of using IAS for introducing mandatory risk assessments income purposes, as well as reinforcing prior to the first import of non-native prevention in the context of imports; species and by adopting white lists by 2030 at the latest;

Or. it

Amendment 875 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Takes the view that the introduction, via international trade, of new pests and diseases and their respective vectors, such as the pinewood nematode in Portugal and cases of Xylella

AM\1225089EN.docx 435/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN fastidiosa in olive trees in various Member States, urgently needs to be prevented; calls for plans to tackle invasive species to be provided with sufficient human, technical and financial resources; calls, further, for new additional financial instruments to be proposed that can help affected areas to tackle invasive species, particularly persistent species or new alien species; considers that it is vital to preserve endemic genetic resources and to select and promote elements of the gene pool that still exist in each Member State;

Or. pt

Amendment 876 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Points out that the trade in wildlife has tragic consequences for our biodiversity and our health, such as an increase in invasive species and the potential risks of transmitting zoonotic infections; calls on the Commission to scale up its action to combat the illegal trade in wildlife; calls on the European Commission to study the need for standard regulations governing the trade in wildlife within the Union and to consider drawing up a positive list of authorised species;

Or. fr

Amendment 877 Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 436/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Emphasises that the further clarification and implementation of these targets require a participative process between the Commission and the Member States, including for the development of a common understanding of the definitions and criteria for the designation of additional protected or strictly protected areas; furthermore considers that an impact assessment should always be a pre-condition and the assessment should also include the estimated leakage effects particularly caused by the relocation in other countries with maybe less biodiversity norms;

Or. en

Amendment 878 Ville Niinistö, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Is concerned about the prospect of genetically engineering wild populations for nature conservation purposes; highlights the fundamental paradigm shift and legal challenges this would entail for nature conservation; warns of its irreversible effects and large potential to cause environmental harm; notes that gene drive organisms could become invasive species in themselves; stresses that gene drive technology is therefore not an appropriate tool to eliminate invasive fauna and flora;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 437/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 879 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Highlights the need for protections and safeguards for local breeds and plant varieties as it is these breeds and varieties which are best suited to the local ecosystem and contribute most to local diets; considers that measures should be taken to encourage farmers and stakeholders involved in land management to make use of a wide variety of local breeds, invest in restoring dwindling local breeds, and where necessary, reintroduce species that were once present, but were lost over time;

Or. en

Amendment 880 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Highlights that investments in restoration activities and in avoiding land degradation by far exceed the costs; believes that the EU Taxonomy can be a useful tool in the future to scale up public and private investments to implement the Biodiversity Strategy and EU Nature Restoration Plan or to track biodiversity- friendly spending in EU public finance; calls therefore on the Commission to prevent any delays in its adoption;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 438/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 881 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Highlights that the introduction of IAS is also linked to other stressors such as marine litter that can be a vector for invasive alien species as it can provide a surface on which many species, organisms or bacteria can cling, which can alter the balance of marine ecosystems, or the dispersal of IAS through ballast waters of shipping activities;

Or. en

Amendment 882 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Notes that the correct implementation of the Nature Directives falls not only on Member States but also on the Commission, and in particular as regards the need for an assessment procedure under the Habitats Directive to enable the protection status of species in particular regions to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 439/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 883 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Notes that invasive exotic species are recognised as the third largest cause of global biodiversity erosion; stresses that, according to the latest estimates of the IUCN’s Red List, they form a threat to almost one-third of threatened land-based species and are involved in one-half of known extinctions;

Or. fr

Amendment 884 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Highlights the success of the Habitats Directive as an effective instrument for the conservation of biodiversity; stresses the need for more flexibility in protection measures to effectively protect humans and livestock if predators pose a danger, and to reflect changes in conservation status;

Or. en

Amendment 885 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 440/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Recalls that the exotic pet trade is not only one of the main pathways of introduction of IAS, but also a major risk factor for the emergence of infectious diseases, the introduction of animal diseases, and poses a threat to species’ conservation and animal welfare;

Or. en

Amendment 886 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Regrets that only one marine species has been included in the IAS list of Union concern1a; calls on the Commission to address this disproportionately low presence of marine invasive alien species to ensure proper alignment with Regulation (EU) No 1143/20142a; ______1a EASIN. “Prioritizing marine invasive alien species in the EU through Horizon Scanning”. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/1 0.1002/aqc.3267 2a OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 35–55

Or. en

Amendment 887 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 441/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Calls on the Commission to give stakeholders all the power they need to take sweeping and concrete action to tackle invasive alien species as a matter of priority, both in terms of time and resources;

Or. it

Amendment 888 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Reaffirms that due consideration should be given to the implementation cost for Member States, the cost of inaction, the cost-effectiveness and the socioeconomic aspects when adopting or updating the list of Union concern;

Or. en

Amendment 889 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Calls on the Commission to address the disproportionately low presence of marine invasive alien species on the IAS list of Union concern to ensure proper alignment with Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014;

PE680.715v02-00 442/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 890 Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21a. Insists on the important role well- regulated hunting plays in protecting healthy forests, grasslands, other countryside and their local species;

Or. en

Amendment 891 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Emphasises that numerous invasive exotic plants can cause problems for public health; points out that their pollen can be particularly allergenic to some, as in the case of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), to which 10 % of the French population is sensitive, and other plants whose sap can cause burns if it comes into contact with skin, such as giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum);

Or. fr

Amendment 892 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

AM\1225089EN.docx 443/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Calls on the Commission to equip Member States with urgent intervention measures to control general predatory species whose conservation status is favourable or on the rise and whose prominence in many environments, just as with IAS, is putting the populations of priority species at risk, for example many bird species that nest on the ground in open or cultivated areas or wetlands;

Or. it

Amendment 893 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Expresses concern that IAS already pose a severe threat to food security, the environment and livelihoods, irreversibly damaging protected areas including the biodiversity they harbour and this is being exacerbated by climate change; acknowledges that plant protection products play a critical role by providing a rapid response to defend areas from existing and newly introduced IAS;

Or. en

Amendment 894 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 444/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Expresses concern that highly invasive species, such the American mink, which has inter alia displaced native mammals and affected the breeding success of native ground-nesting birds and domestic fowl, have not yet been listed as IAS of Union concern despite posing a serious threat to native biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 895 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Stresses that the current legislative framework under the invasive alien species regulation provides for a comprehensive and flexible approach through an array of instruments to address invasive alien species, including permits, authorisation, and enhanced regional cooperation;

Or. en

Amendment 896 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Notes that the proper implementation and enforcement of EU

AM\1225089EN.docx 445/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN environmental legislation is key to tackling the loss of biodiversity; urges the Commission to take greater recourse to legal action when Member States fail to comply with their obligations under EU law;

Or. en

Amendment 897 Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21b. Underlines the need for an open and transparent cooperation with owners and other land users; emphasises adequate compensation for management restrictions and income losses resulting from the implementation of policies with community interest;

Or. en

Amendment 898 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that spending related to invasive exotic species and the Union’s programmes take sufficient account of these impacts on the biodiversity of ultra-peripheral regions (UPR);

Or. fr

PE680.715v02-00 446/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 899 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a ban in EU waters and to promote an international moratorium on deep seabed mining, including at the International Seabed Authority; further calls on them to cease subsidising licences for mineral prospecting and extraction in areas beyond national jurisdiction and to cease funding into the development of seabed mining technology and instead increase funding for research into deep sea ecosystems and biodiversity; furthermore calls on the Commission and Member States not to issue exploitation or new exploration contracts unless and until the environmental, social and economic risks are comprehensively understood and until deep seabed mining can be managed to prevent the loss of marine biodiversity and degradation of marine ecosystems; insists also that free, prior, informed consent from potentially affected communities is obtained; also considers that the reform of the structure and functioning of the International Seabed Authority should be undertaken in order to ensure transparent, and environmentally responsible decision-making is achieved; Reiterates the need to transition to a circular economy based on minimising, reusing and recycling minerals and metals;

Or. en

Amendment 900 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

AM\1225089EN.docx 447/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Subheading 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Funding, mainstreaming and governance Funding, mainstreaming and governance framework framework and overall policy coherence

Or. en

Amendment 901 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Subheading 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Funding, mainstreaming and governance Financing, mainstreaming, governance and framework accountability framework

Or. cs

Amendment 902 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes, including in its external Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant action and in the Neighbourhood, harm’ principle; calls on the Commission Development and International to provide a comprehensive assessment of Cooperation Instrument (NDICI), on the how the EUR 20 billion per year needed basis of the EU Taxonomy; calls for the for nature could be mobilised, to make effective application of the ‘do no corresponding proposals for the Union’s significant harm’ principle to biodiversity annual budget and to examine the need for across EU spending and programmes;

PE680.715v02-00 448/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; calls on the Commission to provide a considers that efforts should be made to comprehensive assessment of how the reach 10 % annual spending on EUR 20 billion per year needed for nature biodiversity under the multiannual could be mobilised, to make corresponding financial framework (MFF) as soon as proposals for the Union’s annual budget possible from 2021 onwards; and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; recalls that, as agreed by the co- legislators, the Recovery and Resilience Facility should contribute to mainstream biodiversity action in the Union policies; notes therefore that Member States should be encouraged to include biodiversity actions in the Recovery and Resilience Plans;

Or. en

Amendment 903 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across all EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes, including the Common Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant Agricultural Policy (CAP) on the basis of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission a robust EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no to provide a comprehensive assessment of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission how the EUR 20 billion per year needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of for nature could be mobilised, to make how the EUR 20 billion per year needed corresponding proposals for the Union’s for nature, as a minimum, could be annual budget and to examine the need for mobilised, to make corresponding a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; proposals for the Union’s annual budget considers that efforts should be made to and to examine the need for a dedicated reach 10 % annual spending on funding instrument for TEN-N; reiterates biodiversity under the multiannual its call for at least 10 % annual spending

AM\1225089EN.docx 449/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN financial framework (MFF) as soon as on biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; insists that the biodiversity-related expenditure must be tracked using a more robust, transparent and comprehensive methodology than the current OECD Rio Market system and be based on the conservativeness principle, as well as having expenditure resulting in a negative impact on biodiversity count negatively towards the total allocation;

Or. en

Amendment 904 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the ‘do no Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant significant harm’ principle and to harm’ principle; calls on the Commission cooperate closely with the co-legislators in to provide a comprehensive assessment of developing the tracking methodology; how the EUR 20 billion per year needed calls on the Commission to provide a for nature could be mobilised, to make comprehensive assessment of how the corresponding proposals for the Union’s EUR 20 billion per year needed for nature annual budget and to examine the need for could be mobilised, to make corresponding a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; proposals for the Union’s annual budget considers that efforts should be made to and to examine the need for a dedicated reach 10 % annual spending on funding instrument for TEN-N given the biodiversity under the multiannual existence of the dedicated LIFE financial framework (MFF) as soon as Programme for nature and biodiversity; possible from 2021 onwards; welcomes the agreement to mainstream spending for biodiversity targets by 7.5% from 2024 and 10% from 2026 onwards; calls for a significant share of this funding to support farmers in reaching the biodiversity targets; calls on the Commission to develop a “biodiversity

PE680.715v02-00 450/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN business case” so that the active preservation of biodiversity done by farmers or land owners will also be funded by private funds;

Or. en

Amendment 905 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia Pereira, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle supporting targets of the provide a comprehensive assessment of Biodiversity Strategy ; calls on the how the EUR 20 billion per year needed Commission to provide a comprehensive for nature could be mobilised, to make assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per corresponding proposals for the Union’s year needed for nature could be mobilised, annual budget and to examine the need for to make corresponding proposals for the a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; Union’s annual budget and to examine the considers that efforts should be made to need for a dedicated funding instrument for reach 10 % annual spending on TEN-N; considers that efforts should be biodiversity under the multiannual made to reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; recalls that biodiversity-related Union spending should be tracked in accordance with an effective, transparent and comprehensive methodology to be set out by the Commission, in cooperation with the European Parliament and the Council;

Or. en

Amendment 906 Ville Niinistö

AM\1225089EN.docx 451/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per year needed how the EUR 20 billion per year needed for nature could be mobilised, to make for nature could be mobilised, to make corresponding proposals for the Union’s corresponding proposals for the Union’s annual budget and to examine the need for annual budget and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; possible from 2021 onwards; insists that progress towards this MFF target should be tracked in accordance with a methodology that is effective, transparent and comprehensive, and should be set out by the Commission, in cooperation with the European Parliament and the Council;

Or. en

Amendment 907 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’

PE680.715v02-00 452/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN principle; calls on the Commission to principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per year needed how the at least EUR 20 billion per year for nature could be mobilised, to make needed for nature could be mobilised, to corresponding proposals for the Union’s make corresponding proposals for the annual budget and to examine the need for Union’s annual budget and to examine the a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; need for a dedicated funding instrument for considers that efforts should be made to TEN-N; considers that efforts should be reach 10 % annual spending on made to reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; possible from 2021 onwards; calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure an increasing annual trend of biodiversity expenditure in order to meet the commitments of the co-legislators within the MFF and the Biodiversity Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 908 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes; calls on the Commission to Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant provide a comprehensive assessment of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission how the EUR 20 billion per year needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of for nature could be mobilised, to make how the EUR 20 billion per year needed corresponding proposals for the Union’s for nature could be mobilised, to make annual budget and to examine the need for corresponding proposals for the Union’s a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; annual budget and to examine the need for considers that efforts should be made to a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; reach 10 % annual spending on considers that efforts should be made to biodiversity under the multiannual reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; calls on the financial framework (MFF) as soon as Commission to draw up a legislative possible from 2021 onwards; proposal that includes sufficient financial resources to compensate farmers for the

AM\1225089EN.docx 453/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN increased costs and/or loss of income due to new practices designed to pursue the objectives of the biodiversity strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 909 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes; calls on the Commission to Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant provide a comprehensive assessment of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission how the resources needed for nature could to provide a comprehensive assessment of be mobilised, to make corresponding how the EUR 20 billion per year needed proposals for the Union’s annual budget for nature could be mobilised, to make and to examine the need for a dedicated corresponding proposals for the Union’s funding instrument for TEN-N; considers annual budget and to examine the need for that efforts should be made to earmark a a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; proportion of annual spending on considers that efforts should be made to biodiversity under the multiannual reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; calls on the financial framework (MFF) as soon as Commission to draw up a legislative possible from 2021 onwards; proposal that includes sufficient financial resources to compensate farmers for the increased costs and/or loss of income due to new practices designed to pursue the objectives of the biodiversity strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 910 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

PE680.715v02-00 454/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle; insists that the EU Taxonomy provide a comprehensive assessment of recognises that the use of cereals, palm oil how the EUR 20 billion per year needed and kernels and soy for animal feed is not for nature could be mobilised, to make sustainable; calls on the Commission to corresponding proposals for the Union’s provide a comprehensive assessment of annual budget and to examine the need for how the EUR 20 billion per year needed a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; for nature could be mobilised, to make considers that efforts should be made to corresponding proposals for the Union’s reach 10 % annual spending on annual budget and to examine the need for biodiversity under the multiannual a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; financial framework (MFF) as soon as considers that efforts should be made to possible from 2021 onwards; reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 911 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle and of providing a clear provide a comprehensive assessment of direction on how to align investments with how the EUR 20 billion per year needed the objectives of the Paris agreement and for nature could be mobilised, to make the European Green Deal; calls on the corresponding proposals for the Union’s Commission to provide a comprehensive annual budget and to examine the need for assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; year needed for nature could be mobilised, considers that efforts should be made to to make corresponding proposals for the reach 10 % annual spending on Union’s annual budget and to examine the

AM\1225089EN.docx 455/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN biodiversity under the multiannual need for a dedicated funding instrument for financial framework (MFF) as soon as TEN-N; considers that efforts should be possible from 2021 onwards; made to reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 912 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per year needed how the EUR 20 billion per year needed for nature could be mobilised, to make for nature could be mobilised, to make corresponding proposals for the Union’s corresponding proposals for the Union’s annual budget and to examine the need for annual budget and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; possible from 2021 onwards; calls on the Commission to take further steps to mobilise private investment for the protection of biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 913 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

PE680.715v02-00 456/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to effective biodiversity mainstreaming and encourage effective biodiversity proofing across EU spending and mainstreaming and proofing across EU programmes on the basis of the EU spending and programmes; calls on the Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant Commission to provide a comprehensive harm’ principle; calls on the Commission assessment of how the resources needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of for nature could be mobilised, to make how the EUR 20 billion per year needed corresponding proposals for the Union’s for nature could be mobilised, to make annual budget and to examine the need for corresponding proposals for the Union’s a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; annual budget and to examine the need for considers that efforts should be made to a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; earmark a proportion of annual spending considers that efforts should be made to on biodiversity under the multiannual reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards, by creating a financial framework (MFF) as soon as specific budget line and without in any possible from 2021 onwards; event compromising the financial resources earmarked for other policies, notably all the instruments of the common agricultural policy;

Or. it

Amendment 914 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes; calls on the Commission to Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant provide a comprehensive assessment of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission how the resources needed for nature could to provide a comprehensive assessment of be mobilised, to make corresponding how the EUR 20 billion per year needed proposals for the Union’s annual budget for nature could be mobilised, to make and to examine the need for a dedicated corresponding proposals for the Union’s funding instrument for TEN-N; considers annual budget and to examine the need for that efforts should be made to earmark a a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; proportion of annual spending on considers that efforts should be made to biodiversity under the multiannual

AM\1225089EN.docx 457/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards, by creating a financial framework (MFF) as soon as specific budget line and without in any possible from 2021 onwards; event compromising the financial resources earmarked for other policies, notably all the instruments of the common agricultural policy;

Or. it

Amendment 915 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes; calls on the Commission to Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant provide a comprehensive assessment of harm’ principle; calls on the Commission how the EUR 20 billion per year needed to provide a comprehensive assessment of for nature could be mobilised, to make how the EUR 20 billion per year needed corresponding proposals for the Union’s for nature could be mobilised, to make annual budget and to examine the need for corresponding proposals for the Union’s a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; annual budget and to examine the need for considers that efforts should be made to a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; reach 10 % annual spending on considers that efforts should be made to biodiversity under the multiannual reach 10 % annual spending on financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. it

Amendment 916 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

PE680.715v02-00 458/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle; underlines the importance of provide a comprehensive assessment of research for innovation and a technology how the EUR 20 billion per year needed neutral framework; calls on the for nature could be mobilised, to make Commission to provide a comprehensive corresponding proposals for the Union’s assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per annual budget and to examine the need for year needed for nature could be mobilised, a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; to make corresponding proposals for the considers that efforts should be made to Union’s annual budget and to examine the reach 10 % annual spending on need for a dedicated funding instrument for biodiversity under the multiannual TEN-N; considers that efforts should be financial framework (MFF) as soon as made to reach 10 % annual spending on possible from 2021 onwards; biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 917 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes, including the Common Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Agricultural Policy, on the basis of the EU principle; calls on the Commission to Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ provide a comprehensive assessment of principle; calls on the Commission to how the EUR 20 billion per year needed provide a comprehensive assessment of for nature could be mobilised, to make how the EUR 20 billion per year needed corresponding proposals for the Union’s for nature could be mobilised, to make annual budget and to examine the need for corresponding proposals for the Union’s a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; annual budget and to examine the need for considers that efforts should be made to a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; reach 10 % annual spending on considers that efforts should be made to biodiversity under the multiannual reach 10 % annual spending on

AM\1225089EN.docx 459/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN financial framework (MFF) as soon as biodiversity under the multiannual possible from 2021 onwards; financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 918 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the EU Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant harm’ principle; calls on the Commission to principle; calls on the Commission to provide a comprehensive assessment of provide a comprehensive assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per year needed how the EUR 20 billion per year could be for nature could be mobilised, to make mobilised, if necessary, to make corresponding proposals for the Union’s corresponding proposals for the Union’s annual budget and to examine the need for annual budget and to examine the need for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; considers that efforts should be made to considers that efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 919 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Andreas Glück, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22. Calls on the Commission to ensure 22. Calls on the Commission to ensure effective biodiversity mainstreaming and effective biodiversity mainstreaming and

PE680.715v02-00 460/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN proofing across EU spending and proofing across EU spending and programmes on the basis of the EU programmes on the basis of the ‘do no Taxonomy and the ‘do no significant significant harm’ principle; calls on the harm’ principle; calls on the Commission Commission to provide a comprehensive to provide a comprehensive assessment of assessment of how the EUR 20 billion per how the EUR 20 billion per year needed year needed for nature could be mobilised, for nature could be mobilised, to make to make corresponding proposals for the corresponding proposals for the Union’s Union’s annual budget and to examine the annual budget and to examine the need for need for a dedicated funding instrument for a dedicated funding instrument for TEN-N; TEN-N; considers that efforts should be considers that efforts should be made to made to reach 10 % annual spending on reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards; possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 920 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Points out that strengthening the Life+ programme, including dedicated envelopes for biodiversity and the management of the Natura 2000 network, should ensure fair distribution of funding among the Member States; emphasises that supporting assessment of the ecological and plant health of forests, including their rehabilitation and reforestation with native species, particularly in those countries worst affected by fires, is vitally important for preserving ecosystems and guaranteeing biodiversity;

Or. pt

Amendment 921 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud,

AM\1225089EN.docx 461/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Welcomes the recent agreement on the multiannual financial framework to establish a new annual biodiversity target of 7.5% in the MFF from 2024, in view of reaching 10% in 2026 and 2027; underlines, however that all possible efforts should be made to reach 10 % annual spending on biodiversity under the multiannual financial framework (MFF) as soon as possible from 2021 onwards;

Or. en

Amendment 922 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Calls on the Commission, for the purposes of carrying out impact assessments of new policies, initiatives and legislation, to complement the sole tool currently used to assess environmental aspects which focuses on climate change by tools examining impacts relating to biodiversity, resource use and pollution;

Or. en

Amendment 923 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 462/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Emphasises that local stakeholders with the necessary and relevant expertise should be involved in the decision-making process of how and where EU funds are spent to ensure that the goals of this strategy are met with utmost efficacy and that the EU environmental acquis is not breached;

Or. en

Amendment 924 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Highlights the need to develop, promote and put in place well-designed compensation schemes for forest-land owners in particular in biodiversity-rich forest ecosystems for an application of a non-intervention regime;

Or. en

Amendment 925 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22a. Regrets that some Member States are allocating no money from the recovery plans to biodiversity and nature- based solutions;

AM\1225089EN.docx 463/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 926 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22b. Maintains that the Union should assume greater responsibility for protection of the Natura 2000 network, especially in terms of its financing; notes the difficulties faced by several Member States in units of management included in the Natura 2000 network, due to the lack of a specific financial instrument aimed at this management level, supporting the inclusion of biodiversity in sectoral policies;

Or. pt

Amendment 927 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22b. Calls on the Commission to strengthen enforcement actions by ensuring as soon as possible that additional financial and human resources are allocated to prioritise implementation and enforcement, by following up systematically on infringement proceedings and by establishing, by 2022, a public database keeping track of the steps taken in response to environmental infringement and preliminary reference judgements;

PE680.715v02-00 464/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 928 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to deleted provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. it

Amendment 929 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Deeply regrets the failure to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to achieve the commitment under the the environment with a view to their Sustainable Development Goals (SDG phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates 14.6) of phasing out harmful fisheries its calls for the reorientation of taxation subsidies by 2020; calls on the systems towards an increased use of Commission and Member States to environmental taxation; provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment or the welfare of animals, including subsidies relating to fisheries and animal agricultural production, with a view to their complete phasing out as soon as possible and by 2025 at the latest, notably including the EU funding for promotion of animal products; reiterates its calls to reorient public and private financial incentives

AM\1225089EN.docx 465/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN (including taxation systems) towards biodiversity-positive investments, and an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 930 Ville Niinistö, Jutta Paulus

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2025 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls and the need to reorient any systems towards an increased use of harmful fisheries subsidies leading to environmental taxation; overcapacity and overfishing towards conservation instead; calls for phasing out of harmful agricultural subsidies as well as any funding or subsidies for unsustainable use of wetland and peatland (e.g. for agricultural, horticultural, forestry, or use for combustion); reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 931 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to

PE680.715v02-00 466/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the environment with a view to their the environment or animal welfare with as phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates well as a plan for their phasing out by its calls for the reorientation of taxation 2025 at the latest, including fisheries systems towards an increased use of subsidies leading to overcapacity and environmental taxation; overfishing as well as agricultural subsidies leading to intensive animal production; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of both public and private financial flows, including taxation systems, towards investments beneficial to biodiversity and climate and an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 932 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation; environmental taxation so that the circulation and provision of foodstuffs are not negatively affected; calls on the Commission to consider forms of compensation in response to the potential economic losses incurred;

Or. it

Amendment 933 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

AM\1225089EN.docx 467/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission and the an assessment of all subsidies harmful to Member States to provide an assessment of the environment with a view to their all subsidies harmful to the environment phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at its calls for the reorientation of taxation the latest; reiterates its calls for the systems towards an increased use of reorientation of taxation systems towards environmental taxation; an increased use of environmental taxation; calls the Commission to provide clear guidelines and incentives to mobilise private finance for biodiversity and encourage divestment from harmful activities by companies;

Or. en

Amendment 934 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment or the welfare of animals, phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates including subsidies relating to animal its calls for the reorientation of taxation agricultural production, with a view to systems towards an increased use of their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; environmental taxation; reiterates its calls to reorient public and private financial incentives, including taxation systems, towards biodiversity- positive investments, and increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 935 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

PE680.715v02-00 468/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2030 at the latest; and to its calls for the reorientation of taxation ensure coherence in all EU funds and systems towards an increased use of programmes so that no expenditure under environmental taxation; the EU budget can contribute to biodiversity loss; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 936 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out; its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. fr

Amendment 937 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all environmental the environment with a view to their subsidies with a view to phasing out those

AM\1225089EN.docx 469/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates not serving their purposes; its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. es

Amendment 938 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of the various subsidies the environment with a view to their harmful to the environment with a view to phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates their phasing out, where possible, using its calls for the reorientation of taxation timeframes to be defined on the basis of systems towards an increased use of scientific evidence and subject to the environmental taxation; availability of European alternatives in the different areas of application; emphasises that this assessment should be without prejudice to other Union policies;

Or. it

Amendment 939 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of the various subsidies the environment with a view to their harmful to the environment with a view to phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates their phasing out, where possible, using its calls for the reorientation of taxation timeframes to be defined on the basis of systems towards an increased use of scientific evidence and subject to the environmental taxation; availability of European alternatives in the different areas of application; emphasises that this assessment should be

PE680.715v02-00 470/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN without prejudice to other Union policies;

Or. it

Amendment 940 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation; environmental taxation; warns against increased taxation burden on Member States and EU's citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 941 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment, including those that phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates cause harm beyond the Union's its calls for the reorientation of taxation borders, with a view to their phasing out systems towards an increased use of by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for environmental taxation; the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 471/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 942 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of subsidies the environment with a view to their counterproductive to the EU - phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates environment policy; reiterates its calls for its calls for the reorientation of taxation tax reforms supporting the transition to a systems towards an increased use of sustainable economy; environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 943 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to assess an assessment of all subsidies harmful to which subsidies are harmful to the the environment with a view to their environment with coherent and cross- phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates sectorial approach with a view to their its calls for the reorientation of taxation phasing out as soon as possible and by systems towards an increased use of 2030 at the latest; environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 944 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

PE680.715v02-00 472/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment that takes into account phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates the social and economic sustainability of its calls for the reorientation of taxation the production activities; reiterates its calls systems towards an increased use of for the reorientation of taxation systems environmental taxation; towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. it

Amendment 945 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Jens Gieseke, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment; reiterates its calls for the phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates reorientation of taxation systems towards its calls for the reorientation of taxation an increased use of environmental taxation; systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 946 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment; reiterates its call towards

AM\1225089EN.docx 473/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates financially incentivised sustainable its calls for the reorientation of taxation measures in line with the upcoming systems towards an increased use of Common Agricultural Policy; environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 947 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation; environmental taxation;

Or. cs

Amendment 948 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2025 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation; environmental taxation;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 474/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 949 Delara Burkhardt

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23. Calls on the Commission to provide 23. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest; reiterates phasing out by 2025 at the latest; reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of systems towards an increased use of environmental taxation; environmental taxation;

Or. en

Amendment 950 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Highlights that the CAP Strategic Plans should mainstream biodiversity- friendly land use and put emphasis on agroecological approaches, including agroforestry; notes that the CAP area- based measures cannot alone, without phasing out harmful subsidies, halt biodiversity loss since also due to the established framework negative population trends have been observed also in areas which have received agri- environment-climate payments, even if the trend was less negative1a; ______1a in Slovakia farmland bird index declined by 17%, while in areas where agri-environment-climate measure of the rural development programme was implemented the decrease observed was 4%.

AM\1225089EN.docx 475/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 951 Martin Hojsík, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Reiterates its calls for the reorientation of taxation systems towards an increased use of environmental revenues, including levies on synthetic fertilizers' and pesticides' use or/and authorisation to be used for the EU-wide independent monitoring and for measures supporting biodiversity on farmland; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of introducing such levies;

Or. en

Amendment 952 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Stresses the necessity to ensure consistency between climate and biodiversity funding; welcomes the commitment that the Coalition for the convergence of climate and biodiversity funding took on January 11, 2021 at the One Planet Summit in Paris to raise their share of climate expenditure beneficial to biodiversity protection;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 476/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 953 Manuela Ripa

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Stresses the danger of massive investments in the context of the European Green Deal to the detriment of biodiversity and reiterates that the good target of zero emissions does not justify all means, especially the public support for projects that harm wildlife animals and threaten soil protection;

Or. en

Amendment 954 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Calls for specific measures to address the embedded biodiversity impacts of the EU's trade relations; calls on the Commission to produce a detailed report in this regard;

Or. en

Amendment 955 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Stresses the need to end fuel subsidies and other direct and indirect

AM\1225089EN.docx 477/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN subsidies that worsen CO2emissions, contradict our energy transition and perpetuate overfishing and overcapacity of the fishing fleet;

Or. en

Amendment 956 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to achieve the objectives of the Biodiversity Strategy in the most effective and least burdensome way for the economic operators;

Or. en

Amendment 957 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that revenues generated from the carbon border adjustment mechanism shall fund actions to protect biodiversity and ecosystems’ restoration;

Or. en

Amendment 958 Sirpa Pietikäinen

PE680.715v02-00 478/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23a. Calls for ensuring that economic activities are directed to preserve biodiversity and ecosystems, not to degrade them;

Or. en

Amendment 959 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23b. Calls on the Commission to provide an ambitious and forward looking framework integrating legislative measures and financial incentives for both public and private sector to support biodiversity actions as part of the upcoming Renewed Sustainable Finance Strategy; stresses that the framework should facilitate both the deployment of biodiversity loss-free supply chains in Europe and the financing of ecosystems restoration;

Or. en

Amendment 960 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 479/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 23b. Calls on the Commission to adapt its climate legislation in its revision to complete the climate-biodiversity nexus through directing the carbon offsets either to the conservation of particularly sensitive areas, such as primary and old- growth forest, or to restoration;

Or. en

Amendment 961 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

23b. Calls on the Commission to examine the introduction of debt swaps for nature as a means of reducing Member States’ national debt and conserving biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 962 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally deleted binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

PE680.715v02-00 480/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. fr

Amendment 963 Alexandr Vondra, Pietro Fiocchi, Hermann Tertsch, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally deleted binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 964 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022; this end in 2022; calls in this regard for

AM\1225089EN.docx 481/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN the establishment of an independent European Panel on Biodiversity (EPB), consisting of scientists selected on the basis of their expertise, whose purpose of which is to monitor on an annual basis the progress on reversing the decline of biodiversity and restoration of nature;

Or. en

Amendment 965 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework which framework, similar to the Climate Law, establishes a monitoring mechanism with which steers a path to 2050 through a set smart indicators; of binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. it

Amendment 966 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which which steers a path to 2050 through a set establishes a monitoring mechanism with of binding objectives, including targets for smart indicators; calls on the Commission

PE680.715v02-00 482/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and to submit a legal proposal to this end in which establishes a monitoring mechanism 2022; with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. it

Amendment 967 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which which steers a path to 2050 through a set establishes a monitoring mechanism with of binding objectives, including targets for smart indicators; calls on the Commission 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and to submit a legal proposal to this end in which establishes a monitoring mechanism 2022; with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. it

Amendment 968 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and

AM\1225089EN.docx 483/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN which establishes a monitoring mechanism which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022; this end in 2022; stresses that increasing human and financial capacity at local, Member State and EU-level will be critical for an effective governance framework, alongside more clarity on specific sectorial commitments and integration into international target deliveries;

Or. en

Amendment 969 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Welcomes the creation of a binding biodiversity governance comprehensive biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, based on co-responsibility and which steers a path to 2050 through a set co-ownership by all relevant actors, to of binding objectives, including targets for map obligations and commitments and set 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and out a roadmap to guide their which establishes a monitoring mechanism implementation, and which establishes a with smart indicators; calls on the monitoring mechanism with smart Commission to submit a legal proposal to indicators; underlines the need to conduct this end in 2022; a thorough impact assessment of the progress and suitability of this governance framework in 2023 before considering further updates and the need for an enhanced approach;

Or. en

Amendment 970 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

PE680.715v02-00 484/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, a Biodiversity Law similar to which steers a path to 2050 through a set of the Climate Law, which steers a path to binding objectives, including targets for 2050 through a set of binding objectives, 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and including targets for 2030 and the COP15 which establishes a monitoring mechanism commitments, which establishes a with smart indicators; calls on the monitoring mechanism with smart Commission to submit a legal proposal to indicators and which addresses protection this end in 2022; and restoration beyond protected areas; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 971 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework which framework, similar to the Climate Law, establishes a monitoring mechanism with which steers a path to 2050 through a set smart indicators that factors in the actual of binding objectives, including targets for achievement of the targets over a longer 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and period of time in line with natural cycles, which establishes a monitoring mechanism as opposed to binding targets set using with smart indicators; calls on the human-centred choices and legal Commission to submit a legal proposal to instruments; this end in 2022;

Or. it

Amendment 972 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

AM\1225089EN.docx 485/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the with smart indicators, such as the Commission to submit a legal proposal to ecological footprint; calls on the this end in 2022; Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 973 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework in the form of a regulation, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of similar to the Climate Law, which steers a binding objectives, including targets for path to 2050 through a set of binding 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and objectives, including targets for 2030 and which establishes a monitoring mechanism the COP15 commitments, and which with smart indicators; calls on the establishes a monitoring mechanism with Commission to submit a legal proposal to smart indicators; calls on the Commission this end in 2022; to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 974 Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

PE680.715v02-00 486/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a which steers a path to 2050 through a set path to 2050, including targets for 2030 of binding objectives, including targets for and the COP15 commitments, and which 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and establishes a monitoring mechanism with which establishes a monitoring mechanism smart indicators; calls on the Commission with smart indicators; calls on the to submit a legal proposal to this end in Commission to submit a legal proposal to 2022; this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 975 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a legally binding biodiversity governance binding biodiversity governance framework, similar to the Climate Law, framework, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a path to 2050 through a set of which steers a path to 2050 through a set of binding objectives, including targets for binding objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to Commission to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022; this end by 2022;

Or. cs

Amendment 976 Christian Doleschal

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a new

AM\1225089EN.docx 487/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which sets the which steers a path to 2050 through a set path towards 2050 through a set of of binding objectives, including targets for realistic objectives, including targets for 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and which establishes a monitoring mechanism which establishes a monitoring mechanism with smart indicators; calls on the with smart indicators; calls on the Commission to submit a legal proposal to Commission to submit a legal proposal for this end in 2022; this purpose in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 977 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a which steers a path to 2050 through a set of path to 2050 through a set of objectives, binding objectives, including targets for including targets for 2030 and the COP15 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and commitments, and which establishes a which establishes a monitoring mechanism monitoring mechanism with smart with smart indicators; calls on the indicators; calls on the Commission to Commission to submit a legal proposal to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022; this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 978 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Alexander Bernhuber, Jens Gieseke

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24. Highlights the need for a legally 24. Highlights the need for a new binding biodiversity governance biodiversity governance framework, framework, similar to the Climate Law, similar to the Climate Law, which steers a

PE680.715v02-00 488/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN which steers a path to 2050 through a set of path to 2050 through a set of objectives, binding objectives, including targets for including targets for 2030 and the COP15 2030 and the COP15 commitments, and commitments, and which establishes a which establishes a monitoring mechanism monitoring mechanism with smart with smart indicators; calls on the indicators; calls on the Commission to Commission to submit a legal proposal to submit a legal proposal to this end in 2022; this end in 2022;

Or. en

Amendment 979 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24a. Calls for coherence across policy areas; notes that while the Biodiversity Strategy rightly recognises the need to minimise the use of whole trees and food and feed crops for energy production, the draft delegated act for the Taxonomy Regulation considers such use of primary material as an activity that has a substantial positive impact on the climate and the environment in line with the flawed sustainability criteria of the RED II; considers such incoherence with the biodiversity and climate goals worrisome and urgently calls for a revision of Renewable Energy Directive and Annexes and for changes in the draft delegated act to the Taxonomy Regulation and its Annexes;

Or. en

Amendment 980 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 489/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24a. Regrets that the lack of a Monitoring and Review Mechanism for the Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 has hindered progress towards the established objectives; believes that due to the trans- boundary and cross-sectorial nature of biodiversity there is an urgent need to integrate all existing monitoring tools at EU-level into one comprehensive monitoring and review Mechanism for the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 including terrestrial and marine biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 981 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24a. Strongly welcomes the outcome of the Consultation on the renewed sustainable finance strategy in which a vast majority of stakeholders believed the EU’s finance agenda should better reflect biodiversity loss, notably by developing EU reporting standards, establishing methodologies for natural capital accounting, developing clear metrics and methodologies or enhance due diligence on infrastructure projects;

Or. en

Amendment 982 João Ferreira

PE680.715v02-00 490/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24a. Points to the importance of a realistic, integrated and cross-cutting approach to climate change, widening the range of means employed to reach reduction targets and avoiding reliance on market-based instruments alone;

Or. pt

Amendment 983 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24b. Notes that the Biodiversity Strategy does not call for citizens’ action and does not consider the creation of a Biodiversity pact analogous to the Climate pact; highlights however that synergies with biodiversity actions and targets can and should be highlighted in the activities of climate ambassadors, as well as at the events and in the promotion action under the Climate pact;

Or. en

Amendment 984 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 491/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 24b. Calls on the Commission to also look at the opportunities that retail investment could offer to support the financing of biodiversity actions, enabling all citizens to take part in the financing of the ecological transition;

Or. en

Amendment 985 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24b. Stresses the need to promote and adopt alternatives to carbon trading, replacing a market-based approach with a fairer and more effective regulatory approach;

Or. pt

Amendment 986 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24a. Strongly believes that the value of nature cannot be measured and urges the Commission not to attempt to quantify the value of nature, as this will only lead to it becoming monetised and subject to cost- benefit analysis;

Or. en

Amendment 987

PE680.715v02-00 492/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24b. Supports the Commission in taking a life-cycle approach in measuring the environmental footprint of products and organisations on the environment;

Or. en

Amendment 988 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24c. Believes that the proposed international natural capital accounting initiative would be extremely detrimental to protection of biodiversity; calls on the Commission to immediately abandon such plans;

Or. en

Amendment 989 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24c. Stresses that it is essential for the upcoming Non Financial Reporting Directive review to integrate requirements covering both climate and biodiversity requirements;

AM\1225089EN.docx 493/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 990 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24d. Urges the Member States - on the basis of the precautionary principle and the principle that preventive action should betaken, and taking into account the risks and the negative climate, environmental and biodiversity impacts involved in hydraulic fracturing for the extraction of unconventional hydrocarbons - not to authorise any new hydraulic fracturing operations in the EU and to halt all existing operations;

Or. en

Amendment 991 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24d. Calls on the Commission to develop a new indicator assessing the biodiversity-friendly investment gap at EU level that would be published on an annual basis; stresses that such an indicator would generate clarity and enable to redirect investments towards biodiversity related actions;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 494/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 992 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

24e. Recalls the commitment of the European Commission to finance the green part - including biodiversity actions - of the Recovery and Resilience plan via the issuance of green bonds; stresses that this will make the EU become the world leader in Green bonds;

Or. en

Amendment 993 Anna Zalewska

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25. Recalls that Article 37 of the EU deleted Charter of Fundamental Rights reflects the principle of ensuring environmental protection in Union legislation; considers that the right to a healthy environment should be recognised in the EU Charter and that the Union should also advocate a similar right internationally;

Or. en

Amendment 994 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25

AM\1225089EN.docx 495/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

25. Recalls that Article 37 of the EU 25. Recalls that Article 37 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights reflects the Charter of Fundamental Rights reflects the principle of ensuring environmental principle of ensuring environmental protection in Union legislation; considers protection in Union legislation; considers that the right to a healthy environment that the right to a healthy environment should be recognised in the EU Charter should be recognised in the EU Charter; and that the Union should also advocate a similar right internationally;

Or. fr

Amendment 995 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25. Recalls that Article 37 of the EU 25. Recalls that Article 37 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights reflects the Charter of Fundamental Rights reflects the principle of ensuring environmental principle of ensuring environmental protection in Union legislation; considers protection in Union legislation; considers that the right to a healthy environment that the right to a healthy environment should be recognised in the EU Charter and should be recognised in the EU Charter and that the Union should also advocate a that the Union should also advocate a similar right internationally; similar right internationally; recalls that ownership rights must be respected;

Or. en

Amendment 996 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Insists that the objectives set by the European Union in terms of protection of

PE680.715v02-00 496/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the biodiversity should be reflected in its external action with third countries and be fully integrated in partnership strategies and agreements, such as fisheries agreement where the European Union can help third countries develop their capacity building to halt biodiversity loss, which can be particularly at stake in those areas;

Or. en

Amendment 997 Ville Niinistö, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Calls on the Commission to confirm that no releases of genetically engineered organisms which can persist and propagate within populations of wildlife species are permitted in the EU, in line with the precautionary principle and GMO legislation, since there are no sufficiently effective methods to control them in time or space or to retrieve them from the environment once released;

Or. en

Amendment 998 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Deplores the idea of 'user pays' principle and points to how such consumption taxes disproportionately affect low- and middle-income earners,

AM\1225089EN.docx 497/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN providing a right to overexploit to those who can afford it;

Or. en

Amendment 999 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that wildlife rescue centres and sanctuaries receive adequate financial support; highlights that these facilities play a critical role within the EU in supporting Member States’ obligations to fight against wildlife trafficking and in ensuring the welfare of confiscated wild animals;

Or. en

Amendment 1000 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Considers that research in public laboratories, research centres and universities in the fields of the environment, public health and food safety should be promoted and stimulated by guaranteeing funds, resources and independent scientific knowledge to promote the protection and restoration of ecosystems and their biodiversity;

Or. pt

PE680.715v02-00 498/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1001 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Calls on the Commission for a strategy on supporting local value chains as key element for reaching the proposed targets; stresses that small-scaled agriculture requires additional support for realising the proposed targets;

Or. en

Amendment 1002 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Calls on the Commission to scale up and align all EU policies with the Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and to apply the principle of policy coherence for nature conservation;

Or. en

Amendment 1003 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 499/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 25b. Reiterates its concern that the staffing of the Directorate General for Environment has undergone significant reductions in the last years and its HR level represents only 1,3 % of all Commission staff; believes that a sufficient level of qualified staff is a precondition for the successful implementation and enforcement of Union policies, including the European Green Deal, the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and its targets;

Or. en

Amendment 1004 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25a. Recognises that unprecedented changes in the Arctic region and its unique ecosystems caused by climate change require more research on Arctic biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1005 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25b. Calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to update, align and adopt their own biodiversity strategies under the framework of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030, and to count on the role of subnational governments,

PE680.715v02-00 500/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN cities and other local authorities to effectively tackle biodiversity loss at all scales, as suggested by the UN CBD Secretariat;

Or. en

Amendment 1006 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25b. Believes that shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution gives a free pass to the richest in society and disproportionately affects workers and low- and middle-income earners who are locked into systems which cannot be changed through consumer choice;

Or. en

Amendment 1007 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25c. Points to how discriminatory a 'user pays' principle is, with the example of right to water; believes that water as a resource can be effectively protected and used sustainably, not by charging people for water usage, but by addressing leakages, modernising appliances, redistributive policies for socio-economic equality, and addressing food systems, particularly meat and dairy, among many other policy actions; considers that such a 'user pays'

AM\1225089EN.docx 501/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN principle serves only to further enshrine neoliberalism into the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 1008 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25c. Urges the Commission to consider the extra-territorial dimension of biodiversity loss, especially on developing countries, and to scientifically assess the overall impact of the EU on global biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1009 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

25d. Calls on the Commission to take action on sustainable corporate procurement;

Or. en

Amendment 1010 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Subheading 10

PE680.715v02-00 502/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

Research and education Research, education and innovation

Or. en

Amendment 1011 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Subheading 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Research and education Research, innovation and education

Or. en

Amendment 1012 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Erasmus programme focused on restoration Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a and conservation; reiterates its calls for a specific mission and funding dedicated to specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research biodiversity within future research programmes; programmes; underlines the importance of adequate resourcing and swift initiation of a digital twin earth system for biodiversity, making full use of Copernicus big data and AI, such as Destination Earth and the LIFEPLAN programme that benefits from the system, to improve knowledge, understanding, predicting capacity and follow up of the implementation of biodiversity goals;

AM\1225089EN.docx 503/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1013 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Erasmus programme focused on programme focussed on exchange of restoration and conservation; reiterates its knowledge and professionals in the field calls for a specific mission and funding of restoration and conservation; reiterates dedicated to biodiversity within future its calls to consider establishing a specific research programmes; mission for biodiversity research and future research programmes to contribute to achieving the overall MFF biodiversity target; points out the importance of showing society the additional efforts required in biodiversity-friendly production methods and the accompanying necessity of additional (private and/or public) funding;

Or. en

Amendment 1014 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Erasmus programme focused on restoration Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a and conservation; highlights the crucial

PE680.715v02-00 504/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN specific mission and funding dedicated to role research and education play in order biodiversity within future research to empirically analyse the loss of programmes; biodiversity; stresses the need for a substantial increase in funding of public research, particularly regarding the development of research indicators to quantify biodiversity measures; reiterates its calls for a specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 1015 Jessica Polfjärd

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within future programmes such as the European research programmes; Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 1016 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green

AM\1225089EN.docx 505/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Erasmus programme focused on restoration Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a and conservation; reiterates its calls for a specific mission and funding dedicated to specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research biodiversity within future research programmes; programmes; stresses that European protected areas must also have an educational vocation and dimension aimed at improving biodiversity preservation by raising public awareness;

Or. fr

Amendment 1017 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity conservation in the programmes such as the European context of the Convention on Biological Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Diversity (CBD) within Union youth Erasmus programme focused on restoration programmes such as the European and conservation; reiterates its calls for a Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green specific mission and funding dedicated to Erasmus programme focused on restoration biodiversity within future research and conservation; reiterates its calls for a programmes; specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 1018 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth

PE680.715v02-00 506/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Erasmus programme focused on restoration Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a and conservation aimed at generating specific mission and funding dedicated to more engagement with these programmes biodiversity within future research among young people; reiterates its calls for programmes; a specific mission and funding dedicated to biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. ro

Amendment 1019 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to focus the efforts Erasmus programme focused on of the LIFE+ programme on exchanges of restoration and conservation; reiterates its best practice in biodiversity restoration and calls for a specific mission and funding conservation; reiterates its calls for a dedicated to biodiversity within future specific mission and funding dedicated to research programmes; biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. es

Amendment 1020 Anna Zalewska

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service; reiterates its calls for a

AM\1225089EN.docx 507/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Erasmus programme focused on specific mission and funding dedicated to restoration and conservation; reiterates its biodiversity within future research calls for a specific mission and funding programmes; dedicated to biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 1021 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity within Union youth programmes such as the European programmes such as the European Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green Erasmus programme focused on restoration Erasmus programme focused on restoration and conservation; reiterates its calls for a and conservation within the EU and in specific mission and funding dedicated to third countries; reiterates its calls for a biodiversity within future research specific mission and funding dedicated to programmes; biodiversity within future research programmes;

Or. fr

Amendment 1022 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26. Calls on the Commission to 26. Calls on the Commission to reinforce biodiversity within Union youth reinforce biodiversity and science within programmes such as the European Union youth programmes such as the Voluntary Service, and to launch a Green European Voluntary Service, and to launch Erasmus programme focused on restoration a Green Erasmus programme focused on and conservation; reiterates its calls for a restoration and conservation; reiterates its specific mission and funding dedicated to calls for a specific mission and funding biodiversity within future research dedicated to biodiversity within future

PE680.715v02-00 508/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN programmes; research programmes;

Or. es

Amendment 1023 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Stresses that biodiversity mainstreaming needs to be accompanied with data collection; notes with concern that basic research, including taxonomy, which is crucial for this purpose, is heavily under-resourced and lacks support in policy, research funding and is neglected also in the Biodiversity Strategy; calls for adequate funding to be allocated from Horizon Europe for basic research projects and capacity building, for also using the technical assistance axis of other EU funds for this purpose and developing support schemes under Common Agricultural Policy with embedded data collection;

Or. en

Amendment 1024 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Recalls that more than 80% of the ocean has not been explored and that scientific knowledge is vital to understand how to protect and restore biodiversity; urges in that sense the Commission to

AM\1225089EN.docx 509/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN play a major role in the UN’s Decade of Ocean Science, to scale up efforts on oceanic research and to support digitisation and the use of artificial intelligence with a view to improving our understanding of the seas and the ocean and our impact on them; to support and finance new oceanic expeditions and encourage participative sciences with all marine stakeholders;

Or. en

Amendment 1025 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Highlights the importance of healthy soil for biodiversity, sustainable forest management, forest conversion and agricultural ecosystem services and takes note of existing knowledge and data gaps in the area; calls on the Commission and Member States to support further research in soil ecosystem services and to adjust relevant existing funding programmes in order to facilitate such research projects;

Or. en

Amendment 1026 Dolors Montserrat, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Calls for more research on the social and economic impacts of

PE680.715v02-00 510/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN biodiversity conservation policies, in order to design policies that support rural and coastal communities of farmers, livestock breeders, fishermen and artisans living in and all around the protected areas, to ensure their survival and a new sustainable transformative development according to the recovery of biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1027 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Calls on the Commission to facilitate agricultural innovation and the access to these technologies for European farmers in the pursuit of further protecting biodiversity by incentivising technologies, including biopesticides and digital tools with a proportionate and evidence-based regulatory framework which can support the need for monitoring and decision-making;

Or. en

Amendment 1028 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Recognises the importance of continuous research to understand the dynamics between different ecosystems, and foresee impacts that climate change

AM\1225089EN.docx 511/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN can provoke; calls for the constitution of a specialized European Digital Innovation Hub, available to European researchers, to focus on biodiversity research and big data analysis;

Or. en

Amendment 1029 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Stresses that Member States should enable farmers to have financial support, training, technology, innovation and the development of new business models in the uptake and delivery of biodiversity and environmental benefits; while considering the importance of balancing voluntary measures and regulatory action;

Or. en

Amendment 1030 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Recalls the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, the Bonn Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals and the European engagements taken therein; calls on the competent bodies to promote international cooperation insuring the protection of

PE680.715v02-00 512/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN animal migratory routes;

Or. en

Amendment 1031 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support capacity building and cooperation among authorities, citizens, scientists, professionals and other stakeholders in general; believes that investing in strengthening and expanding the pool of taxonomic expertise in the Member States is of particular importance;

Or. en

Amendment 1032 Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Ulrike Müller, Christian Doleschal, Stefan Berger, Marlene Mortler, Alexander Bernhuber, Jens Gieseke

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Stresses that Member States should provide farmers to with financial support, training, technology and innovation in the uptake and delivery of biodiversity and environmental benefits; while considering the importance of balancing voluntary measures and regulatory action;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 513/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1033 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Stresses that greater research is urgently needed to understand biodiversity tipping points, and how biodiversity collapse could impact essential services, such as food provision;

Or. en

Amendment 1034 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Recommends the EU to join the global call of the ‘UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration’ (2021-2031), to massively scale up to protect and revive ecosystems all around the world;

Or. en

Amendment 1035 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 514/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 26a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make pesticide free agriculture and sustainable agroforestry a top priority in the Horizon Europe programme;

Or. en

Amendment 1036 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Welcomes the proposal for a new Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity; believes this can be an effective tool in monitoring and implementing this strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 1037 Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Calls on the Member States to improve their school curricula, adding more focus on education about the value of biological diversity and its protection;

Or. en

Amendment 1038 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution

AM\1225089EN.docx 515/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Paragraph 26 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26a. Calls on the Member States to scale up the different scientific modules on biodiversity;

Or. fr

Amendment 1039 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the composition of European biodiversity and its impacts on the functioning of ecosystems, in order to better project and predict the harmful impacts of biodiversity loss; stresses that even in the case of well-known taxa e.g. the proportion of threatened species is hard to estimate accurately; calls for increased capacity of biodiversity research for deepening the understanding of biodiversity, including research on biotic interactions, ecosystems resilience and recovery from disturbances; notes that biodiversity research should be included broadly in different EU and Member State funding programmes allowing both for basic and applied research and that long- term and comprehensive funding is essential in order to underpin and inform conservation and restoration actions;

Or. en

Amendment 1040 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Nils Torvalds, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir,

PE680.715v02-00 516/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Stresses the importance of closing critical knowledge gaps and improving our understanding of biogeographical regions; underlines the need to improve knowledge on key risk behaviours, illegal, unregulated, and the legal and regulated wildlife trade as a contributing factor to disease risk, and improving understanding of the relationship between ecosystem degradation and restoration, landscape structure and the risk of disease emergence; urges to improve horizon scanning to identify emerging threats and challenges and policy responses to them;

Or. en

Amendment 1041 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Calls on the Commission to especially enable and support small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) to contribute to the goals of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030; acknowledges that SMEs are a valuable source and contributor to a sustainable biodiversity path driven by green and digital innovation;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 517/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1042 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Lídia Pereira, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Highlights that EU projects’ outcomes can represent valuable asset for the mainstream policy and planning action; underlines the potential of EU co- funded research and LIFE projects for monitoring of species and ecosystems, including for the strict protection and restoration targets;

Or. en

Amendment 1043 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Encourages the establishment of educational marine protected areas to increase collaboration and participation of all stakeholders and improve knowledge and awareness on how to protect marine biodiversity for citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 1044 Lídia Pereira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

PE680.715v02-00 518/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Recognises the burdensome bureaucracy felt by scientists who lead programs, and calls for better optimization of spending with higher coordination between projects and innovation centres;

Or. en

Amendment 1045 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Welcomes the new EU Soil Observatory; believes that data collection, accessible information and public awareness about soil health is essential for their sustainable use;

Or. en

Amendment 1046 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26b. Calls on the Member States to support innovative biodiversity and environmental practices via new technologies (artificial intelligence);

Or. fr

Amendment 1047

AM\1225089EN.docx 519/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26c. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the monitoring framework within the CAP including by wider use of the incentivising result-based schemes with monitoring embedded within and calls for consideration of implementation of these schemes also as forest- environment measures;

Or. en

Amendment 1048 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

26c. Encourages research regarding the melting of glaciers and the permafrost, caused by climate change, in order to further analysed and avoid the potential issues about the release of viruses trapped in the ice;

Or. en

Amendment 1049 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 520/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 26c. Believes that environmental education must be an integral part of the education of all; calls on Member States to integrate environmental education comprehensively into their school curricula and practices;

Or. en

Amendment 1050 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution Subheading 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

International action and ocean governance Post-2020 global biodiversity framework, international action and ocean governance

Or. en

Amendment 1051 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Subheading 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

International action and ocean governance International action, trade, and ocean governance

Or. en

Amendment 1052 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

AM\1225089EN.docx 521/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in deleted its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post-2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. fr

Amendment 1053 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; biodiversity loss by 2030; believes that 2021 represents a watershed moment for biodiversity globally and it is the EU's moral responsibility to ensure the most ambitious outcome possible for COP15; stresses that the EU must push for an ambitious and binding global agreement on the post-2020 framework on biodiversity with clear goals and binding targets on protected areas both in the EU overall and globally; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 522/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1054 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Highlights the need for strong and resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 coordinated multilateral action to bring on biodiversity and the need for a post- the biodiversity crisis to an end; 2020 binding agreement similar to the emphasises the importance of meeting Paris Agreement to halt and reverse international commitments, in particular biodiversity loss by 2030; those relating to the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post-2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. fr

Amendment 1055 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; biodiversity loss by 2030; reiterates its call for the EU to push for a high level of ambition during the negotiations,

AM\1225089EN.docx 523/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN including legally binding global restoration and protection targets of at least 30% by 2030, to reflect the EU's level of ambition domestically; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. en

Amendment 1056 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 binding agreement, with smart Paris Agreement to halt and reverse targets and a robust implementation biodiversity loss by 2030; framework, similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; stresses the need for a science- based, independent, harmonised and transparent review mechanism on the progress of the Parties to meeting the targets; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. en

Amendment 1057 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

PE680.715v02-00 524/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; biodiversity loss by 2030; reiterates its request that this agreement include objectives with detailed timetables, performance indicators and evaluation mechanisms; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. fr

Amendment 1058 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 binding agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; biodiversity loss by 2030; welcomes the commitment by the High Ambition Coalition for Nature and People to support the global objective to protect 30% of land and sea worldwide; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. en

Amendment 1059 Andreas Glück

AM\1225089EN.docx 525/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27. Recalls the position expressed in its 27. Recalls the position expressed in its resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 resolution of 16 January 2020 on COP156 on biodiversity and the need for a post- on biodiversity and the need for a post- 2020 binding agreement similar to the 2020 multilateral agreement similar to the Paris Agreement to halt and reverse Paris Agreement to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030; biodiversity loss by 2030; ______6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015. 6 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2020)0015.

Or. en

Amendment 1060 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Recalls that the environmental footprint of Europe's production and consumption urgently needs to be reduced in order to stay within planetary boundaries by 2030, since we would need 2.8 planets if everybody in the world lived like the average EU citizen; believes therefore that the EU and the Member States have a special responsibility to pursue policies with immediate, medium- term and long-term objectives to mitigate the effects of climate change, defend habitats, halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity as well as transform its foreign and trade policies accordingly, and to assist developing countries in implementing programmes for the protection of biodiversity; highlights in this regard the need to ensure that further

PE680.715v02-00 526/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN and future efforts to halt and reverse biodiversity loss in EU terrestrial and marine areas do not transfer pressures to other parts of the world;

Or. en

Amendment 1061 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Recalls that reducing the Union’s global footprint must be one of the major focal points of the EU’s Biodiversity Strategy; stresses, in this regard, the impact of importing certain products into the European Union on deforestation and biodiversity loss in third countries, and calls on the Commission to examine the need for action to limit the placement on the European market of products associated with deforestation; emphasises the need to better develop eco-labelling and anti-deforestation certification;

Or. fr

Amendment 1062 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Warns about the risk of certain production sectors relocating to countries, such as China, that have laxer legislation than Europe on biodiversity, despite the Commission’s determination to make them priority trade partners; calls on the

AM\1225089EN.docx 527/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Commission to ensure that trade policy is consistent with the objectives of its Green Deal and does not favour imported products that do not meet our standards;

Or. es

Amendment 1063 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Calls on the Commission to champion an ambitious governance model in international UN negotiations on marine biodiversity and marine genetic resources beyond national jurisdictions; calls to recognise the ocean as a global common, with a view to a new approach in the preamble that prioritises individual and collective responsibilities over the traditional principles of freedom and sovereign rights, as laid down in the Law of the Sea, and thus ensures that the ocean is protected;

Or. en

Amendment 1064 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Regrets the dire state of fish stocks across the globe; welcomes that the Biodiversity Strategy commits the EU to applying zero tolerance towards illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and

PE680.715v02-00 528/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN combatting overfishing; calls also on the EU to tackle harmful fishing practices; supports the call for a global agreement to ban harmful fisheries subsidies and calls therefore for appropriate revisions in the EU fisheries policies; takes stock of the environmental impact of the EU's Fisheries Partnership Agreements (FPAs);

Or. en

Amendment 1065 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Highlights the importance of long- term EU support for the most important ecosystem, biodiversity hotspots and protected areas in Africa; welcomes the new ‘NaturAfrica’ initiative and its potential to benefit conservation, economic recovery, security and local populations; calls for the development of similar initiatives for other regions while extending Key Biodiversity Areas to contribute to increasing the resilience of developing countries to Climate Change;

Or. en

Amendment 1066 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 529/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Takes note of the failure of the World Trade Organisation Members to conclude the ongoing negotiations on fisheries subsidies by the end of 2020; calls on the Union to play a more prominent role in bringing these negotiations to an agreement, while showing more ambition towards a rapid phasing out of harmful fisheries subsidies, in line with Sustainable Development Goal 14;

Or. en

Amendment 1067 Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Calls on the Commission to continue encouraging and supporting international initiatives to restore biodiversity, and degraded land around the world, such as the African Union-led Great Green Wall project, which has given back to people in the Sub-Saharan area, from Senegal to Ethiopia, a great extension of recuperated land to cultivate while restoring biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1068 Alexander Bernhuber, Petri Sarvamaa, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Agnès Evren, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

PE680.715v02-00 530/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Supports global negotiations that promote a global level playing field for the sustainable EU bioeconomy and help avoiding leakage effects to regions with less stringent environmental regulation, thus promoting employment in the EU, as well as competitiveness, resilience and strategic autonomy of European industries;

Or. en

Amendment 1069 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Norbert Lins, Petri Sarvamaa, Hildegard Bentele, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Supports global negotiations that promote a global level playing field for the sustainable EU bio-economy and help avoiding leakage effects to regions with less stringent environmental regulation, thus promoting employment in the EU, as well as competitiveness, resilience and strategic autonomy of European industries;

Or. en

Amendment 1070 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Calls again the Commission to provide for the enforceability of Trade

AM\1225089EN.docx 531/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN and Sustainable Development (TSD) Chapter of our Free Trade Agreements; is of the opinion that this should be done through the inclusion of proportionate and progressive sanction provisions in TSD chapters;

Or. en

Amendment 1071 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Considers that world trade deregulation is having a significant effect in terms of increasing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and believes that it is necessary and urgent that this situation be properly studied and evaluated;

Or. pt

Amendment 1072 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Welcomes the launch of the High Ambition Coalition for Nature and People during the One Planet Summit on 11 January 2021 and the commitment made by 50 countries to protect 30 % of lands and seas by 2030;

Or. fr

PE680.715v02-00 532/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1073 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Believes that it is essential to put environmental and social sustainability at the core of future EU trade policy and every bilateral trade agreement in order to give substance to the Farm to Fork Strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 1074 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27a. Encourages the EU and the Member States to promote the recognition of ecocide as an international crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC);

Or. en

Amendment 1075 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Stresses that the global financing gap for biodiversity amounts to USD 711 billion per year to 2030; calls on the Union and Member States to devote

AM\1225089EN.docx 533/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN adequate financial resources to global biodiversity protection and to encourage the rest of the international community to do the same in order to enable the adoption and implementation of an ambitious post-2020 framework capable of halting the biodiversity crisis; emphasises, in this regard, the need to support the poorest countries in implementing this framework as well as the importance of the private sector’s commitment to protecting and restoring ecosystems;

Or. fr

Amendment 1076 Frédérique Ries, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Welcomes the Commission's commitment to crack down on illegal wildlife trade; considers that the Biodiversity Strategy fails to recognise legal wildlife trade as a driver of biodiversity loss as well; urges the Commission to address the impact of legal and illegal wildlife trade as a whole on biodiversity and global health, to promote and assist third countries in seriously restricting or ending the trade and sale of wildlife for human consumption while taking into account the legitimate consideration of subsistence hunting by Indigenous People and local communities for household consumption; calls on the Union to champion this idea in all relevant international fora;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 534/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1077 Agnès Evren, Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Supports the Commission’s ambition to assess the impact of trade agreements on biodiversity, with follow-up action to strengthen the biodiversity provisions of existing and new agreements; calls on the Commission to include binding and enforceable sustainable development and biodiversity protection chapters in all future trade agreements;

Or. fr

Amendment 1078 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Stresses the need to revise the EU’s integrated maritime policy with a view to establishing a strategic framework that incorporates all marine environment laws, encourages, in that sense, to support a strategic approach for topics that overlap between marine biodiversity, climate policy and the common fisheries policy;

Or. en

Amendment 1079 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae

AM\1225089EN.docx 535/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Calls on the EU to strengthen its inter-parliamentary dialogue and be a world pioneer in biodiversity conservation by cooperating with low-income countries; stresses the importance of increased EU support towards the COP 15 in conserving, protecting and restoring biodiversity worldwide;

Or. en

Amendment 1080 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27b. Underlines that deep-sea mining always does serious harm to the environment; believes that marine minerals in the international seabed should not be exploited unless they are of critical importance; calls on the EU to advocate this approach at the International Seabed Authority;

Or. en

Amendment 1081 Pascal Canfin

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 536/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 27b. Emphasises that the EU-Mercosur agreement cannot be ratified as it stands since, inter alia, it does not ensure biodiversity protection, in particular in the Amazonia;

Or. en

Amendment 1082 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27c. Underlines the impact of illegal wild meat trafficking into the EU on the biodiversity of the meat's countries of origin as well as of the EU through the potential import of pathogens; highlights the lack of knowledge as regards the magnitude and routes of this traffic; calls on the Commission to make full use of the potential of the pilot project "International Wild Meat Trafficking: developing new tools and policies to halt this underreported crime in the EU" adopted by the Parliament to remedy this and better fight this traffic;

Or. en

Amendment 1083 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Nils Torvalds, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27c. Stresses the strong links between

AM\1225089EN.docx 537/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN biodiversity loss and increasing emergence of pandemics; calls on the EU to promote during the upcoming COP 15 the establishment of a supranational scientific council to identify policy options, monitor and prevent the root causes of pandemics resulting from environmental degradation and biodiversity loss; calls on the Parties to commit to a reduction and elimination of wildlife trade of high-risk disease species;

Or. en

Amendment 1084 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27c. Invites the Commission to implement and follow the recommendations established by the Mission Starfish 2030: Restore our Ocean and Waters;

Or. en

Amendment 1085 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27c. Points out that the African continent is home to a unique biodiversity and calls on the two continents to unite their efforts in the context of the new Africa-European Union partnership to preserve African biodiversity and address

PE680.715v02-00 538/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the threats facing it, in particular deforestation, desertification, and poaching, trafficking and trade in wildlife; stresses, moreover, the importance of European support for the Great Green Wall initiative in the Sahel and nature-based solutions;

Or. fr

Amendment 1086 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27d. Welcomes the announcement of the launch of the NaturAfrica initiative to protect wildlife and ecosystems; calls for local communities to be fully involved in protecting flora and fauna and for focus to be placed on education in order to raise awareness among the youngest children of the conservation of this unique heritage;

Or. fr

Amendment 1087 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27d. Urges the Commission and Member States to continue to work with the international community to recognise the contribution of indigenous people and local communities in the protection of biodiversity, to guarantee their rights, and

AM\1225089EN.docx 539/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN to support their participation in decision- making processes;

Or. en

Amendment 1088 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27d. Strongly supports the integration of human rights in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework;

Or. en

Amendment 1089 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27e. Welcomes the Biodiversity Strategy's commitment to revise by 2021 the EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking to step up efforts to combat the illegal wildlife trade both within the EU and globally; calls on the Commission to ensure that the post-2020 EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking is fully integrated into the 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, receives adequate funding and includes baselines and measurable indicators so that progress can be assessed and objectives delivered within a specified timeframe;

PE680.715v02-00 540/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 1090 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27e. Points out that wildlife trafficking is one cause of biodiversity loss, and that it threatens the survival of numerous species, fosters organised crime and violence, and encourages the transmission of viruses to humans; stresses that the European Union is still a destination market and transit zone for products resulting from this trafficking, and that it is highly profitable and poorly penalised;

Or. fr

Amendment 1091 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27e. Welcomes the Commission's commitment to ensure the full implementation of the biodiversity provisions in all EU Free Trade Agreements; calls on the Commission to make use of all tools available to this end, including sanctions in cases of non- compliance;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 541/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1092 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27f. Welcomes the announcement of the revised EU Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking; calls for this action plan to be included in the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 with sufficient financial resources; calls, too, for the European Commission and Member States to substantially scale up assistance to partner countries in combating these criminal networks and securing protected areas;

Or. fr

Amendment 1093 Frédérique Ries, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27f. Stresses that environmental crimes constitute a threat to peace and security, and often converge with other serious crimes such as corruption, cybercrimes and financial crimes; therefore calls on the EU to adopt a new legislation similar to the US Lacey Act that prohibits trade in wildlife, fish and plants that have been illegally taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any foreign law;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 542/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1094 Frédérique Ries, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

27g. Considers that the new Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) from 2021 onwards can act as an important driver of change for biodiversity restoration and preservation worldwide; therefore calls for at least 10% of annual spending under the new NDICI to be dedicated to biodiversity restoration and preservation, and as a critical means of implementing the new Multiannual Financial Framework target spend on biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1095 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Asger Christensen, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Calls on all Parties to the CBD to the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, scale up and reinforce action and from and within the EU, including ‘pre- monitoring against wildlife legal and convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and illegal trafficking and promote the asks for similar restrictions for other development of specific, measurable, endangered species, such as tigers; quantifiable targets to this end; reiterates its call for a full ban on the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, from and within the EU, including ‘pre-convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers;

AM\1225089EN.docx 543/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1096 Tudor Ciuhodaru

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, from and within the EU, including ‘pre- from and within the EU, including ‘pre- convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and asks for similar restrictions for other asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers; endangered species, such as tigers; calls for measures to increase protection of these animals by cooperating with international institutions and the relevant countries in order to prevent the killing of animals for ivory harvesting;

Or. ro

Amendment 1097 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Calls on the Commission to lead the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, efforts to protect biodiversity effectively in from and within the EU, including ‘pre- all relevant international fora; reiterates convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and in that context its call for a full ban on the asks for similar restrictions for other trade in both raw and worked ivory to, endangered species, such as tigers; from and within the EU, including ‘pre- convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers;

Or. cs

PE680.715v02-00 544/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1098 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Reiterates its call to reduce wildlife the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, trade and consumption and to protect from and within the EU, including ‘pre- wildlife and key ecosystems globally convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and including a full ban on the trade in both asks for similar restrictions for other raw and worked ivory to, from and within endangered species, such as tigers; the EU, including ‘pre-convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers;

Or. en

Amendment 1099 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, from and within the EU, including ‘pre- from and within the EU, including ‘pre- convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and convention’ ivory; calls for the asks for similar restrictions for other implementation of such a ban without endangered species, such as tigers; further delay in 2021 and asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers and rhinos;

Or. en

Amendment 1100 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28

AM\1225089EN.docx 545/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

28. Reiterates its call for a full ban on 28. Reiterates its call for a ban on the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, European level on ivory trade to, from and from and within the EU, including ‘pre- within the EU, including ‘pre-convention’ convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and ivory and rhino horns; asks for similar restrictions for other endangered species, such as tigers;

Or. en

Amendment 1101 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all new and future trade and investment agreements are fully compatible with the EU's biodiversity commitments as well as the SDGs, contain binding and enforceable chapters on trade and sustainable development, including safeguards to prevent them from being implemented in a manner that could lead to biodiversity loss and degradation of ecosystems; calls furthermore on the Commission to assess the extent to which existing trade and investment agreements directly or indirectly contribute to loss of biodiversity and degradation of natural ecosystems, and to propose measures to address such detrimental impacts where identified, in particular by including binding, enforceable and sanctionable provisions for the protection of natural ecosystems in existing trade agreements which do not yet contain such provisions; stresses the need to pandemic-proof all new and future trade agreements and calls on the Commission to do so; calls on

PE680.715v02-00 546/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the commission to also do a comprehensive pandemic assessment of all existing trade and investment agreements;

Or. en

Amendment 1102 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Recognises the detrimental effect of commercial wildlife trade, both legal and illegal, on biodiversity, human and animal health and welfare; and calls for the introduction of measures to end the unnecessary commercial trade in endangered species and their parts; believes that a new proposal for legislation should be considered, which would be based on the precautionary principle and the ‘do no harm’ principle at its very core; underlines, furthermore, that the Commission should assess legislative means how to ensure that importation, transhipment, purchase and sale of wildlife taken, processed, transported or sold in violation of laws in the country of origin is prevented;

Or. en

Amendment 1103 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 547/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 28a. Emphasises the potential of using ‘green deal diplomacy’ to achieve better protection of biodiversity and the environment outside of Europe; calls on the Commission and Member States to effectively integrate the protection of the environment and biodiversity in all external action; insists that coordination and cooperation across borders is key for the protection and joint management of transboundary ecosystems and for the designation of ecological corridors; insists further on the need to strengthen cooperation programmes with third countries for the conservation of their native biodiversity, and in particular with developing countries;

Or. en

Amendment 1104 Jytte Guteland, Günther Sidl

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Urges the Commission to revise the Environmental Crime Directive and address the disparities in its application by Member States; calls for the inclusion of environmental offences, such as IUU fishing and illegal hunting, in this legislation; underlines the need for wildlife crime to be recognised as a serious criminal activity that should be heavily penalised, especially in the context of(transnational) organised crime;

Or. en

Amendment 1105 Pascal Canfin, Catherine Chabaud, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Martin Hojsík

PE680.715v02-00 548/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Strongly supports the work undertaken by the Task Force on Nature- related Financial Disclosure and calls on the Commission to fully take it into account in the upcoming renewed sustainable finance strategy; welcomes the political support by France, Canada and the United Kingdom to this initiative;

Or. en

Amendment 1106 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Points out that, despite the ban on the international ivory trade, elephant poaching and ivory trafficking have reached unprecedented levels; notes that between 20 000 and 30 000 African elephants are illegally hunted every year; stresses that, in 2015, more than 40 tonnes of ivory were seized;

Or. fr

Amendment 1107 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 549/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Calls on the Commission and the Union to push for the adoption of an ambitious Global Ocean Treaty to protect marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction worldwide in the next session of the Intergovernmental Conference on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction;

Or. en

Amendment 1108 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Underscores that better assessment of the impact of biodiversity on trade agreements will be useless unless biodiversity provisions are substantially strengthened; calls on the Commission to show willingness to ambitiously revisit biodiversity provisions in all trade agreements;

Or. en

Amendment 1109 Andreas Glück

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Believes calling for serious restrictions or bans of legal international wildlife trade and sales in third countries risks shifting them into to barely governable practices; calls therefore for a

PE680.715v02-00 550/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN narrow legal corridor to prevent sliding into criminality;

Or. en

Amendment 1110 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to assist the global community in ending the commercial trade and sale of wild animals (including in live animal and “bush meat” markets);

Or. en

Amendment 1111 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28b. Notes with concern the spread of zoonotic pathogens from animals to humans and between species and acknowledges that wildlife markets and wildlife trade are seriously contributing to this; regrets the implementation gaps of EU Wildlife Trade Regulations as they do not cover all critical species and do not provide the same protection for captive- bred animals; urges the Commission to jointly address legal commercial trade and illegal trade in the Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the upcoming review of the EU Wildlife Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking;

AM\1225089EN.docx 551/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1112 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28b. Reiterates its call for a full ban on the trade in both raw and worked ivory to, from and within the EU, including ‘pre- convention’ ivory and rhino horns, and calls for similar restrictions for all other endangered species, such as tigers, together with all species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES);

Or. fr

Amendment 1113 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28b. Highlights that the trading and farming of wild animals amplifies risks for public health, combining critical factors for the occurrence of zoonosis; calls on the Commission and on the EU Member States to advocate a global ban on wildlife markets and on the use of wildlife in traditional medicine; urges the Commission to present legal proposals to ban the import, the trade and the keeping and consumption of wildlife in the EU, in order to reduce the risk of future zoonosis outbreaks;

PE680.715v02-00 552/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 1114 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28b. Welcomes the commitment to increase financial flows to developing countries for biodiversity; believes the sovereignty of developing states must be respected and that such financial support should not be used for geopolitical or economic purposes or as a form of neocolonialism;

Or. en

Amendment 1115 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28c. Warns that trade and trafficking of wildlife is causing the suffering of animals that are totally unsuitable as pets and is putting animal and human health and biodiversity at great risk; calls on the Commission to propose a Positive List which states which animal species are suitable and safe to be kept as pets to effectively regulate the exotic pet trade in the EU and to ensure that no animals are kept as pets which can increase the risk of outbreaks of pandemics;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 553/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1116 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28c. Notes that an IUCN report reveals that some 229 000 tonnes of plastic waste are discharged into the Mediterranean every year, which is the equivalent of more than 500 shipping containers per day;

Or. fr

Amendment 1117 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28c. Supports the One Health Approach and urges the Commission and Member States to advocate this at all international fora;

Or. en

Amendment 1118 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28d. Notes that for primary microplastics, i.e. those that mix with ocean water in the form of small particles and not in the form of the degradation of large waste, the discharge of plastic into

PE680.715v02-00 554/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN the Mediterranean is estimated at 13 000 tonnes per year;

Or. fr

Amendment 1119 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 e (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

28e. Notes that with the current status quo, pollution in the Mediterranean is likely to increase to 500 000 tonnes per year by 2040;

Or. fr

Amendment 1120 Agnès Evren

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; deplores the fact that, lead negotiations for an international according to the European strategy for agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; plastics in a circular economy of 16 January 2018, the 150 million tonnes of accumulated plastic in the oceans could double by 2030, putting more than 600 species at risk and weakening the resistance of marine ecosystems to climate change; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; stresses the particular case of microplastics, which are particularly dangerous to marine biodiversity, and calls on the Commission to further tackle the problem of

AM\1225089EN.docx 555/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN microplastics and to develop synergies between its biodiversity strategy and the new action plan for the circular economy;

Or. fr

Amendment 1121 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; that at the surface, lead negotiations for an international the cumulative mass of floating waste agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; represents only 1% of the plastics discharged into the ocean; whereas the latest scientific research estimates that the level of plastic pollution in the ocean has been greatly underestimated and that there are still major gaps in oceanographic knowledge today; and that a research effort on the dispersion of marine litter in the ocean is crucial to better understand the extent of marine pollution and its impact on marine biodiversity; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 1122 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution

PE680.715v02-00 556/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of involving local fishing communities based far and wide across the Member States in recovering and tackling plastic littering in the seas in order to meet this objective, in exchange for fair compensation for operators;

Or. it

Amendment 1123 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; notes that the Union lead negotiations for an international already has taken steps to tackle plastic agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; waste in oceans through measures as the single-use plastic directive and port reception facilities directive; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; encourages the Union to increase and improve recycling and reuse of plastic waste;

Or. en

Amendment 1124 Hermann Tertsch

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1225089EN.docx 557/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; calls on the Commission to carry out a detailed impact study into the effects of microplastics and their disintegration on human and animal health;

Or. es

Amendment 1125 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030, which deals with the full plastics economy including a cap on new plastic production;

Or. en

Amendment 1126 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Stresses that marine plastic has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, at least 267 species; calls on the Union to directly affecting hundreds of thousands lead negotiations for an international of marine animals each year; calls on the agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement and

PE680.715v02-00 558/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN binding targets for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 1127 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes with deep concern that has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting marine plastic pollution has increased at least 267 species; calls on the Union to tenfold since 1980, affecting all marine lead negotiations for an international and coastal life, and particularly 267 agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 1128 Frédérique Ries, Catherine Chabaud, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Martin Hojsík, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes with alarm that marine has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting plastic pollution has increased tenfold since at least 267 species; calls on the Union to 1980, affecting directly at least 267 lead negotiations for an international species; calls on the Union to lead agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; negotiations for an international agreement providing for binding targets towards plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 559/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1129 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species; calls on the Union to lead negotiations for an international lead negotiations with the sovereign agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; Member States for an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. fr

Amendment 1130 Roberta Metsola

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species and human health; lead negotiations for an international calls on the Union to lead negotiations for agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 1131 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29. Notes that marine plastic pollution 29. Notes that marine plastic pollution has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting has increased tenfold since 1980, affecting at least 267 species; calls on the Union to at least 267 species and human health;

PE680.715v02-00 560/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN lead negotiations for an international calls on the Union to lead negotiations for agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030; an international agreement for plastic-free oceans by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 1132 Alessandra Moretti

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Stresses the need to put environmental and social sustainability at the core of future EU trade policy and every bilateral trade agreement in order to give substance to the Farm to Fork Strategy; stresses the importance of including respect for biodiversity in trade agreements in order to halt global deforestation and prevent the overexploitation of fishery and marine resources; urges developing countries to support biodiversity and alignment with European standards on sustainability, and to prevent the exploitation of workers; calls on the Commission to ensure that imported products meet the same standards required of European producers in order to protect biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 1133 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Highlights that the deep sea is believed to have the highest biodiversity

AM\1225089EN.docx 561/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN on Earth and provides critical environmental services, including long- term carbon sequestration; stresses that the precautionary principle must apply to the emerging deep seabed mining sector and, given the scientific warnings regarding significant and potentially irreversible environmental harm being implied, is concerned about the Commission’s intention to further fund research into deep sea mining technologies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ban deep seabed mining, including at the International Seabed Authority, and instead to invest into a transition to a circular economy based on minimising, reusing and recycling minerals and metals;

Or. en

Amendment 1134 Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Stresses that the deep sea is home to the greatest diversity of species and ecosystems on Earth and that scientists have warned that deep seabed mining risks to cause inevitable and permanent biodiversity loss; calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a moratorium in EU waters, including in national continental shelves, to promote the adoption of an international moratorium on deep seabed mining including by the International Seabed Authority, and to cease funding for the development of seabed mining technology until the guarantee that deep seabed mining can be managed to prevent the degradation and loss of marine

PE680.715v02-00 562/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN biodiversity is provided;

Or. en

Amendment 1135 Martin Hojsík, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Expresses its concerns about the growing damage caused by environmental crime and involvement of organised groups therein; believes that fight against environmental crime needs to be strengthened, in Member States and across their borders; encourages the cooperation between the Commission, and DG JUST, HOME and ENV in particular, and the Member States; stresses that efforts and collaboration must be intensified, including by building adequate capacities on national and regional levels; calls, furthermore, on the Member States to recognize environmental and wildlife crime as serious criminal activity and apply penalties with a strong deterrent effect;

Or. en

Amendment 1136 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Recalls its Resolution of 16

AM\1225089EN.docx 563/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN January 2018 on international ocean governance1a; calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a moratorium on deep-sea mining in EU waters and to ask the International Seabed Authority to set a moratorium on the deep sea mining for all its parties, to reform the structure and functioning of the International Seabed Authority; calls on the Commission to cease funding for the development of deep-sea mining technology, consistent with the need to transition to a circular economy based on minimizing, reusing and recycling minerals and metals and calls on the Commission to instead fund research into deep sea ecosystems and biodiversity; ______1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0004

Or. en

Amendment 1137 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Believes that the EU has a historic responsibility to promote ambition at international fora, by showing it through its own commitments and through its assistance to others, particularly Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries; believes the EU should acknowledge and act on its environmental responsibilities by setting a credible and ambitious example; stresses that the best form of environmental diplomacy is by showing global leadership and solidarity, including leadership on biodiversity through the Convention on Biological Diversity;

PE680.715v02-00 564/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 1138 Marco Dreosto, Silvia Sardone, Lucia Vuolo, Simona Baldassarre, Danilo Oscar Lancini, Vincenzo Sofo, Annalisa Tardino, Luisa Regimenti, Gianantonio Da Re

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Stresses the importance of including respect for biodiversity in trade agreements in order to halt global deforestation and prevent the overexploitation of fishery and marine resources; urges developing countries to support biodiversity and alignment with European standards on sustainability, and to prevent the exploitation of workers; calls on the Commission to ensure that imported products meet the same standards required of European producers in order to protect biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 1139 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Stresses the importance of including respect for biodiversity in trade agreements in order to halt global deforestation and prevent the overexploitation of fishery and marine resources; urges developing countries to support biodiversity and alignment with European standards on sustainability, and to prevent the exploitation of workers; calls on the Commission to ensure that

AM\1225089EN.docx 565/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN imported products meet the same standards required of European producers in order to protect biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 1140 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Stresses the importance of including respect for biodiversity in agreements in order to halt global deforestation and prevent the overexploitation of fishery and marine resources; urges developing countries to support biodiversity and alignment with European standards on sustainability, and to prevent the exploitation of workers; calls on the Commission to ensure that imported products meet the same standards required of European producers in order to protect biodiversity;

Or. it

Amendment 1141 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Reiterates its request that the Commission submit in 2021 a strong proposal for an EU legal framework to halt and reverse EU-driven global deforestation, by ensuring that the Union market and consumption patterns do not

PE680.715v02-00 566/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN detrimentally affect forests and natural ecosystems and biodiversity, as well as the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities;

Or. en

Amendment 1142 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Underlines that it has been decided that the Habitats Directive should not be revised; calls on the Commission and Member States at all times to preserve the Habitats Directive and to implement it in full, taking as a starting point the protection of the habitats of wild animals, the restoration of protected species and the protection of animal welfare;

Or. en

Amendment 1143 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to join efforts to reach an agreement on marine biological diversity beyond national jurisdictions; recalls that the establishment of MPAs in areas beyond national jurisdictions must be supported by socio-economic and ecological impact assessments based on the best available scientific advice;

AM\1225089EN.docx 567/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1144 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Points out the global interdependence of ecosystems and warns, in this respect, against the risk of pressure on ecosystems in other parts of the world as a side effect of future EU policies; calls on the Commission to use diplomatic, economic and legal measures to mitigate this risk;

Or. cs

Amendment 1145 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Urges the Commission to prioritise action to halt and reverse biodiversity and species decline in international and bilateral trade agreements and diplomatic dialogue, and in the European Union’s international aid and development programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 1146 Alexander Bernhuber, Christine Schneider, Marlene Mortler, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 568/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Underlines that all international trade agreements have to fulfil the requirements which are set by this strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 1147 Catherine Chabaud, Frédérique Ries, Martin Hojsík, Pascal Canfin, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29a. Welcomes the African initiative on the "Great Green Wall" and calls on the Commission to support this project;

Or. en

Amendment 1148 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29b. Stresses the very much overlooked environmental impact that EU Member States have through their military operations and trade in arms, and underlines how this contributes significantly to environmental degradation worldwide; calls for the Commission to assess the environmental impact of PESCO and Member State militaries; believes that demilitarisation must be part of the European Green Deal;

AM\1225089EN.docx 569/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1149 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29c. Whereas the EU must uphold the principle of equity in its multilateral dealings and ensure that it acts in good faith with less powerful states;

Or. en

Amendment 1150 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29d. Underlines that the territories of the world’s 370 million indigenous people cover 24 % of land worldwide and contain 80 % of the world’s biodiversity; believes that indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) is crucial to effectively protecting biodiversity and that indigenous voices must always be heard on national and international fora on biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1151 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 e (new)

PE680.715v02-00 570/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

29e. Believes that international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement must be designed in a way to ensure they do no harm to local communities and their biodiversity; calls on the EU and the Member States to advocate robust rights-based social and environmental safeguards, including Free Prior and Informed Consent, and a ‘do no harm’ principle, as well as grievance mechanisms governed by an independent body and supervisory bodies free from conflict of interest for all international carbon market mechanisms, and to ensure in particular that all Article 6 mechanisms fully respect and protect the rights of local communities; reiterates its support for the establishment of a share of proceeds to provide financial support to those populations most vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 1152 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 f (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29f. Recalls the ‘do no harm’ principle under the European Green Deal, and urges the Commission to rapidly ensure the full consistency of existing and future trade and investment agreements and other global regulations with the international environmental and climate goals, in particular the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 571/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1153 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 g (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29g. Reiterates its support for the end of EU exports of waste, an enhanced circular economy worldwide and the introduction of a global ban on single-use plastics;

Or. en

Amendment 1154 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 h (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 h. Stresses that meeting our climate objectives should never happen at the expense of biodiversity; believes that bioenergy policy requires strict environmental and social criteria in order to prevent land-grabbing and deforestation; in this light, calls on the Union and the Member States to lead the initiative at the next UN General Assembly for the global recognition of the right to a healthy environment;

Or. en

Amendment 1155 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 i (new)

PE680.715v02-00 572/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 i. Stresses that climate change and environmental degradation increasingly interact with the drivers of human displacement, since populations are being forcibly displaced from their homes by the effects of climate change, environmental degradation and disasters; points out that, due to climate change and biodiversity loss, such crises will multiply in the decades to come unless swift and effective action is taken now; stresses that the EU must be ready for climate-induced displacement and displacement from environmental degradation and disasters and recognises the need for adequate measures to be taken to protect the human rights of affected populations;

Or. en

Amendment 1156 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 j (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 j. Notes the IPCC Technical Paper V on Climate Change and Biodiversity from April 2002; urges the EU and the Member States to call for an IPCC Special Report on biodiversity and climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 1157 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 k (new)

AM\1225089EN.docx 573/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 k. Endorses the position expressed in the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) that exports of crops, deforestation, and other transfers of resources from developing countries have contributed to the deterioration of nature, while importing developed countries and rapidly growing developing countries often decrease nature degradation nationally; calls on the EU to pay specific attention, in the context of the external dimension of the Biodiversity Strategy, to developing countries and their populations, as they are territories with high biodiversity;

Or. en

Amendment 1158 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 l (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 l. Recalls that indigenous peoples are active agents of environmental conservation; recalls that the IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land recognises that indigenous peoples and local communities play a critical role in stewarding and safeguarding the world’s lands and forests and preventing climate change, and that strengthening their rights is a crucial solution in the context of the climate crisis; also recalls the statement in the IPBES Global Assessment Report that nature is generally declining less rapidly on indigenous peoples’ land than on other lands; emphasises the interdependence of

PE680.715v02-00 574/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN nature, economy and society and, in particular, the direct effects that biodiversity loss has on indigenous communities and the acute existential threat that many of them face;

Or. en

Amendment 1159 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Subheading 12

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Implementation and enforcement of nature Implementation, enforcement and recast of legislation relevant legislation

Or. en

Amendment 1160 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 m (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 m. Calls for greater international support for indigenous peoples’ collective rights to land, territories and resources, which would contribute to limiting global warming and biodiversity loss since the territories of the world’s 370 million indigenous peoples cover 24 % of land worldwide and contain 80 % of the world’s biodiversity; believes this will contribute to combating the degradation of ecosystems, ensuring indigenous livelihoods and contributing to greater equity in these efforts; urges all Member States to ratify without delay the ILO’s Indigenous and Tribal Peoples

AM\1225089EN.docx 575/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Convention of 1989 (ILO Convention No 169);

Or. en

Amendment 1161 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 n (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 n. Expresses its deep concern at the increasingly perilous situation of environmental rights defenders, especially in developing countries, and the culture of impunity, particularly in relation to crimes and threats against the most marginalised and most vulnerable; condemns any attempts to deregulate environmental and human rights protections in the context of the COVID- 19pandemic and other crises; also expresses its concern at the situation of environmental defenders and whistle- blowers throughout the world; recalls that everyone should have access to the enjoyment of human rights, environmental protection and sustainable development, and that no one should be penalised, persecuted or harassed for protecting the environment; calls on the Commission to support environmental defenders across the world;

Or. en

Amendment 1162 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 o (new)

PE680.715v02-00 576/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

29 o. Stresses that bioplastics pose equal threats to marine wildlife as conventional plastics and considers, therefore, that there must be a reduction in plastic production and use;

Or. en

Amendment 1163 Anja Hazekamp, Nikolaj Villumsen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

29b. Reiterates that Member States must ensure that there is no deterioration of Natura 2000 areas and must implement conservation measures in order to maintain or restore the favourable conservation status of protected species and habitats; calls for the Nature Directives to be fully implemented in order to ensure that conservation actions that are taken are in line with the latest technical and scientific progress; calls for rapid and decisive action by the Commission to ensure full implementation by the Member States, including by the increased use of infringement procedures;

Or. en

Amendment 1164 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

AM\1225089EN.docx 577/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set to out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission pursue infringement infringement procedures to remedy all procedures more swiftly, effectively and cases of non-compliance and to allocate transparently, including through the sufficient resources in order to overcome regular follow-up of cases, to remedy all the current delays; cases of non-compliance and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays; stresses that strategic enforcement can also be delivered through an enhanced environmental implementation review process, with more binding and time-bound commitments;

Or. en

Amendment 1165 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission to live up to its infringement procedures to remedy all commitment on zero tolerance to non- cases of non-compliance and to allocate compliance in nature protection, swiftly sufficient resources in order to overcome pursue infringement procedures, to use its the current delays; prerogative to ask for a decision ordering interim measures and compel compliance through imposition of sanctions and penalty payments in nature protection; remedy all cases of non-compliance and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 578/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Amendment 1166 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Emphasizes the importance of comply with the obligations set out in impact assessments of any legally binding existing EU nature legislation and calls on actions suggested in the strategy including the Commission to swiftly pursue an assessment of the proportionality in infringement procedures to remedy all relation to means and goals and costs; cases of non-compliance and to allocate urges Member States to fully comply with sufficient resources in order to overcome the obligations set out in existing EU the current delays; nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures to remedy all cases of non- compliance and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

Amendment 1167 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures to remedy all infringement procedures to remedy all cases of non-compliance and to allocate cases of non-compliance to promptly and sufficient resources in order to overcome efficiently prosecute the illegal killing, the current delays; taking and trade of European protected wildlife, and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 579/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1168 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Proposes that Member States fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and allocate the Commission to swiftly pursue sufficient resources in order to overcome infringement procedures to remedy all the current delays; cases of non-compliance and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. fr

Amendment 1169 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures to remedy all infringement procedures to remedy priority cases of non-compliance and to allocate cases of non-compliance particularly sufficient resources in order to overcome affecting habitat conservation and to the current delays; allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

Amendment 1170 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution

PE680.715v02-00 580/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures to remedy all infringement procedures to remedy priority cases of non-compliance and to allocate cases of non-compliance particularly sufficient resources in order to overcome affecting habitats and to allocate sufficient the current delays; resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

Amendment 1171 Maria Arena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in implement and comply with the existing EU nature legislation and calls on obligations set out in existing EU nature the Commission to swiftly pursue and marine legislation and calls on the infringement procedures to remedy all Commission to systematically pursue cases of non-compliance and to allocate infringement procedures to remedy all sufficient resources in order to overcome cases of non-compliance and to allocate the current delays; sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays;

Or. en

Amendment 1172 Nikolaj Villumsen, Manuel Bompard, Mick Wallace, Anja Hazekamp, Silvia Modig, Malin Björk on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30

AM\1225089EN.docx 581/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

30. Urges Member States to fully 30. Urges Member States to fully comply with the obligations set out in comply with the obligations set out in existing EU nature legislation and calls on existing EU nature legislation and calls on the Commission to swiftly pursue the Commission to swiftly pursue infringement procedures to remedy all infringement procedures to remedy all cases of non-compliance and to allocate cases of non-compliance and to allocate sufficient resources in order to overcome sufficient resources in order to overcome the current delays; the current enforcement delays;

Or. en

Amendment 1173 Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Expresses its concern over the term ‘nature based' solutions due to its broadness and ambiguity; calls for a clear definition to be developed at EU level and/or at the level of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, supplemented with an exclusion list of techniques and 'solutions' which do not fall under this definition; considers that this exclusion list should include, inter alia, geoengineering, genetic engineering including gene drives as well as biodiversity offsetting; highlights that too- broad an interpretation of the term is harmful to the efforts of conservation, sustainable use and benefit sharing of biological biodiversity (the three pillars of the CBD); expresses furthermore the concern that the term ‘nature based’ is used to conflate natural ecosystems such as forests, soils, grasslands, estuaries and mangroves with, for example, monoculture tree plantations, which do not provide the benefits in terms of mitigation, adaptation or other ecosystem functions; endorses 'ecosystem based'

PE680.715v02-00 582/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN approaches as defined under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, which offer a more holistic strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way;

Or. en

Amendment 1174 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Emphasises the importance of implementing and enforcing environmental legislation to protect biodiversity, and applying liability in the event of breaches or damage to the environment; calls on the Commission to revise the Environmental Liability Directive (2004/35/EC) and the Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law (2008/99/EC) so as to make an effective contribution to the targets set out in the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030;

Or. cs

Amendment 1175 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Underlines that correct implementation of the nature directives

AM\1225089EN.docx 583/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN not only falls on Member States but also with the European Commission including the need for an assessment procedure to enable the protection status of species in particular regions to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached, in accordance with Article 19 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;

Or. en

Amendment 1176 Linea Søgaard-Lidell, Ulrike Müller, Asger Christensen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Points out that protecting and preserving biodiversity will mean varied and dissimilar approaches and solutions in the Member States; underlines that each Member State has different circumstances and land use that will affect its options for action; asks the Commission to not create a one-size-fits- all-model, but instead allow each Member State to identify how they can meet the biodiversity management and conservation objectives at EU-level;

Or. en

Amendment 1177 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 584/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 30a. Calls on the Commission to establish an evidence-based evaluation of the implementation of the strategy’s measures and targets, in particular of the individual and cumulative impacts on the social and economic sustainability of agriculture in the EU, food security and prices, farmland availability and prices and the potential risks of displacing biodiversity losses abroad by the replacement of local agricultural production with imports;

Or. en

Amendment 1178 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Points out that lengthy procedure and prolonged dialogues with Member state are an issue in the field of environmental infringements due to a risk of an irreversible damage on environment; highlights that in case of urgency, the Commission can shorten the period given to reply to the letter of formal notice and the reasoned opinion1a; supports these decisions and actions of the Commission; ______1a In the infringement procedure under Article 258 TFEU against Romania for systemic breaches of the EU Environmental law in relation to forestry activities, for both replies Romania was given 1 month instead of standard 2 months to reply.

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 585/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1179 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Stresses the need to effectively pursue the strategy’s goals at various levels, taking account of trade-offs between their impacts so as to avoid situations in which applying one instrument, guided by one objective, has a more negative than positive overall impact;

Or. pt

Amendment 1180 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take adequate measures to address socio-economic conflicts linked to coexistence with large carnivores, such as preventive and compensation measures, prioritising their protection;

Or. en

Amendment 1181 Radan Kanev

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE680.715v02-00 586/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN 30a. Considers that specialised management bodies and site management plans, developed and monitored through adaptive management are key for the effective management and equitable governance of the Natura 2000 network;

Or. en

Amendment 1182 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Highlights the need for comprehensive mapping of carbon-and nature-rich areas, the effects of management, habitat condition and other factors in order to inform decision- making on restoration priorities;

Or. en

Amendment 1183 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Calls on the Commission to review the implementation of this strategy after three years in order to be able to ensure certainty that its 2030 headline objective will be met;

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 587/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1184 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Stresses the importance of cooperation between Member States in order to increase their research on innovation to counter existing pollution;

Or. fr

Amendment 1185 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Catherine Chabaud, Susana Solís Pérez, Martin Hojsík, Billy Kelleher, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Pascal Canfin, Frédérique Ries

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30a. Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to speed up implementation and enforcement;

Or. en

Amendment 1186 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Martin Hojsík

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Notes with concern that the 2016 Commission Implementation Report on the ELD concluded that eleven Member States have reported no ELD damage incidents since 2007 and stated that this is

PE680.715v02-00 588/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN ‘possibly because they deal with cases exclusively under their national system’; urges therefore the Commission to assume its responsibility for effective implementation and calls for the ELD to be transformed into a regulation1a; calls for an assessment of whether the Environmental Crime Directive would not serve better its purpose as a regulation; ______1a as in the compromise amendment on the Opinion of ENVI on liability of companies for environmental damage

Or. en

Amendment 1187 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Underlines that the correct implementation of nature legislation not only falls on Member States but also with the Commission including the need for an assessment procedure to enable the protection status of species in particular regions to be amended as soon as the desired conservation status is reached, in accordance with Article 19 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;

Or. en

Amendment 1188 Nicolae Ştefănuță, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Véronique Trillet- Lenoir, Catherine Chabaud, Martin Hojsík

AM\1225089EN.docx 589/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Calls on Member States to improve the quality and completeness of their monitoring systems in order to be able to draw firm conclusions as to the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network; notes that for a satisfactory assessment of the effectiveness of Natura 2000-related measures, monitoring should involve collecting more data on areas inside and outside the network and on the quality of conservation management;

Or. en

Amendment 1189 César Luena

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Urges the Commission to revise the Environmental Crime Directive and address the disparities in its application by Member States; calls for the inclusion of environmental offences, such as IUU fishing and illegal hunting, and for the recognition of wildlife crime as a serious criminal activity that should be adequately penalised, especially in the context of organised crime;

Or. en

Amendment 1190 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

PE680.715v02-00 590/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Considers that the EU’s emissions trading scheme for greenhouse gases has failed, having proved ineffective in achieving the emission reduction targets; stresses that the creation of more carbon markets is compromising and undermining the adoption of other environmental regulations;

Or. pt

Amendment 1191 Mick Wallace, Clare Daly

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Reiterates its call on the Commission, given the lack of progress towards achieving the 2020 biodiversity targets, to provide Parliament with two- yearly reports in which the Council and the Commission elaborate on the state of play, reasons for non-achievement and the strategy for ensuring future compliance;

Or. en

Amendment 1192 Radan Kanev

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Stresses that tools and global standards for Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Evaluation

AM\1225089EN.docx 591/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN (PAMEE) successfully applied worldwide could substantially contribute to assess and improve the effectiveness of Natura 2000 network management;

Or. en

Amendment 1193 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30b. Calls on the Member States to take appropriate measures to prevent future pollution by incorporating artificial intelligence from this moment on as this will make it possible to reduce certain effects on humans and on European ecosystems;

Or. fr

Amendment 1194 Radan Kanev

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30c. Stresses that the IUCN Green List for Protected and Conserved Areas (GLPCA) standard provides a globally attested pathway for improving, assessing and recognizing the effective management of protected areas; recognises that over the coming programme period, all protected areas including Natura 2000 sites, whose management and activities are funded by the European taxpayers may significantly improve their effectiveness, transparency and

PE680.715v02-00 592/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN accountability through enrolling a globally recognized standard, such as IUCN GLPCA;

Or. en

Amendment 1195 Radan Kanev

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

30d. Stresses the importance of harmonised implementation and enforcement of the EU legislation throughout all the Member States to provide a stable and transparent regulatory framework for business operations within the different national jurisdictions;

Or. en

Amendment 1196 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors; calls on the Commission to create a calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition; transition and for existing platforms, expert groups and other similar entities on all matters related to biodiversity and drivers of its loss to ensure equitable and inclusive representation of different stakeholders; notes that indigenous

AM\1225089EN.docx 593/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN peoples of Europe are not represented in any of the expert groups or relevant subgroups1a; calls for an immediate change of the status quo where applicable; ______1a from the response of the Sámi people to the consultation to the Roadmap of the EU Forest Strategy ''The Saami Council supports a broad consultation process, but underlines the need and the obligation under international law to also include the indigenous people, the Sámi people in this process. We are currently not represented in any of the expert groups or other relevant subgroups.'', available here: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/betterregulat ion/ have-yoursay/ initiatives/12674-EU- Forest-Strategy- ?fbclid=IwAR0YS1Ah55gNy6OtxINd0iec JD7l6bV9QqXGfQ1AlB1XMEChT5t0zjCf saE.

Or. en

Amendment 1197 Alexander Bernhuber, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth, Dolors Montserrat

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors calls on the Commission to create a directly concerned and requires local and stakeholder platform for discussion and to regional acceptance; calls on the ensure an inclusive, equitable and just Commission to create a stakeholder transition; platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition; emphasises the importance of thorough and comprehensive impact assessments of the overall Strategy and any legislative

PE680.715v02-00 594/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN action related to the Strategy; stresses the need to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens in the implementation of the Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 1198 Francesca Donato, Marco Dreosto

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors, calls on the Commission to create a especially those most affected; calls on the stakeholder platform for discussion and to Commission to create a stakeholder ensure an inclusive, equitable and just platform for discussion and to ensure an transition; inclusive, equitable and just transition; stresses the importance of carrying out complete and in-depth impact assessments of the general strategy and any related legislative initiatives; stresses the need to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens when implementing the strategy;

Or. it

Amendment 1199 Fulvio Martusciello, Salvatore De Meo, Antonio Tajani

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors, calls on the Commission to create a emphasising the importance of respect for stakeholder platform for discussion and to local biodiversity management, as is ensure an inclusive, equitable and just already the case in the Habitats and

AM\1225089EN.docx 595/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN transition; Natura 2000 areas; calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive transition, in line with the sustainable development targets, that is equitable and just;

Or. it

Amendment 1200 Ulrike Müller, Nils Torvalds, Andreas Glück, Asger Christensen, Norbert Lins

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors; calls on the Commission to create a calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition; transition; emphasises the importance of thorough and comprehensive impact assessments of the overall Strategy and any legislative action related to the Strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 1201 Pietro Fiocchi

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors; calls on the Commission to create a calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just ensure an inclusive, equitable and just

PE680.715v02-00 596/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN transition; transition, which would include fishermen, farmers, hunters, breeders, foresters and landowners;

Or. it

Amendment 1202 Antoni Comín i Oliveres

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors, calls on the Commission to create a and on an "all public administrations" stakeholder platform for discussion and to approach that includes regional and local ensure an inclusive, equitable and just authorities; calls on the Commission to transition; create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition;

Or. en

Amendment 1203 Alexandr Vondra, Hermann Tertsch, Pietro Fiocchi, Anna Zalewska, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión, Andrey Slabakov, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Rob Rooken

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors calls on the Commission to create a directly concerned and requires local and stakeholder platform for discussion and to regional acceptance; calls on the ensure an inclusive, equitable and just Commission to create a stakeholder transition; platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition;

AM\1225089EN.docx 597/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 1204 Aurelia Beigneux, Joëlle Mélin, Catherine Griset, Annika Bruna

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the involvement of all actors and sectors; calls on the Commission to create a calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to stakeholder platform for discussion; ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition;

Or. fr

Amendment 1205 Pernille Weiss

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. Underlines that the successful implementation of the strategy depends on implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; the direct involvement of all actors and calls on the Commission to create a sectors; supplementary calls on the stakeholder platform for discussion and to Commission to create a stakeholder ensure an inclusive, equitable and just platform for discussion and to ensure an transition; inclusive, equitable and just transition

Or. en

Amendment 1206 Stanislav Polčák

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31

PE680.715v02-00 598/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

31. Underlines that the successful 31. (Does not affect English version.) implementation of the strategy depends on the involvement of all actors and sectors; calls on the Commission to create a stakeholder platform for discussion and to ensure an inclusive, equitable and just transition;

Or. cs

Amendment 1207 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Sirpa Pietikäinen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Notes that nature conservation framework subject to weak implementation could potentially create a hostile environment for activists and conservationists and lead directly or indirectly to endangering their lives; together with the Commission expresses strong concerns that freedom of expression has come under threat by associations or federations clamping down on activists, NGOs and journalists militating for forests’ protection in the EU1a; underlines that this has recently resulted in murderous acts in the EU and is thus extremely serious and requires coherent communication from all the Commission DGs and citizens' representatives in support of proper implementation of the nature legislation; ______1a reply of the Commission to a letter of MEPs, Ref. Ares(2020)6589550

Or. en

AM\1225089EN.docx 599/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN Amendment 1208 Alexander Bernhuber, Jessica Polfjärd, Christophe Hansen, Marlene Mortler, Christine Schneider, Edina Tóth

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the swift and effective implementation of the recent revision of the Renewable Energy Directive and continue to assess the use of biomass for biofuels as part of the upcoming review; stresses that the use of wood, especially of damaged wood, for bioenergy should increase the size and sustainability of the EU’s and the world’s forests in the light of the rising demand for energy from renewable sources;

Or. en

Amendment 1209 Petros Kokkalis

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Believes that the stakeholders platform must be thorough, include gender perspective and develop beyond the level of mere consultation, to the active and representative participation of communities and stakeholders in the decision-making process in order to inspire the ownership of decisions, plans and initiatives and the engagement in actions;

Or. en

Amendment 1210

PE680.715v02-00 600/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN Inese Vaidere

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Calls on the Commission to increase the frequency of monitoring the application of the EU biodiversity legislation at the national level, demanding that Member States submit annual implementation reports that are presented in Parliament;

Or. en

Amendment 1211 Martin Hojsík, Irena Joveva, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Frédérique Ries, Michal Wiezik, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Highlights its increased expectations related to the quality of impact assessments and calls on the Commission to analyse both cost of action and non-action in terms of immediate and long-term impact on environment and human health;

Or. en

Amendment 1212 Chrysoula Zacharopoulou

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Stresses the importance of the role

AM\1225089EN.docx 601/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN played by wildlife rehabilitation centres and calls for the necessary means and resources to be provided so that they can carry out their activities properly and ensure the well-being of animals;

Or. fr

Amendment 1213 Christine Schneider, Christian Doleschal, Pernille Weiss, Norbert Lins, Marlene Mortler

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31a. Underlines the need to create incentives for all actors and sectors to advance a transformative biodiversity agenda;

Or. en

Amendment 1214 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein, Martin Hojsík, Ville Niinistö

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31b. Calls on and encourages the Commission, when revising the Renewable Energy Directive, to open articles and Annexes on the matters related to sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions saving criteria for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels in line with the EU Biodiversity Strategy and the Green Deal; considers that there is a justified concern that subsidies emanating from roundwood used for energy purposes are part of business plans of some members of bioenergy industry and this

PE680.715v02-00 602/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN needs to be revised and such energy completely excluded from the support schemes and renewable energy targets without delay; notes that energy use of residues with carbon payback time relevant for the EU climate targets will not be impacted by this change;

Or. en

Amendment 1215 Michal Wiezik, Radan Kanev, Róża Thun und Hohenstein

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

31c. Recalls that targets for renewable energy set by the EU have resulted in a surge in the consumption of woody biomass1a;denounces a policy that allowed to make the Member States’2a forests, including in protected areas, a factory for wood pellets; and that awards subsidies to

energy sources with higher CO2 emissions per unit of energy generated than coal, and to the lowest ranking use of wood in the wood use cascade; ______1a JRC, 2018: Biomass production, supply, uses and flows in the European Union 2a Latvia and Estonia being the leading EU exporters of wood pellets from wood harvested including in protected areas, report Hidden inside a Wood Pellet (2020): https://media.voog.com/0000/0037/1265/fi les/Biomass_report_ENG%20_2020.pdf, as reported also e.g. by Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ jan/14/carbon-neutrality-is-a-fairy-tale- how-the-race-for-renewables-is-burning- europes-forests?fbclid=IwAR3aSO- uiYHuJLgs-FzcSYkYCtlTLE9GrFZc2--

AM\1225089EN.docx 603/604 PE680.715v02-00 EN QYvmZz2SGcGuikZKMZfo

Or. en

PE680.715v02-00 604/604 AM\1225089EN.docx EN