Why Can't You Tickle Yourself?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Can't You Tickle Yourself? REVIEW NEUROREPORT Why can't you tickle yourself? Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,CA Daniel Wolpert and Chris Frith Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK CACorresponding Author It is well known that you cannot tickle yourself. Here, we an increase in tickliness. Functional neuroimaging studies have discuss the proposal that such attenuation of self-produced demonstrated that this sensory attenuation might be mediated tactile stimulation is due to the sensory predictions made by an by somatosensory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex: these internal forward model of the motor system. A forward model areas are activated less by a self-produced tactile stimulus than predicts the sensory consequences of a movement based on by the same stimulus when it is externally produced. Further- the motor command. When a movement is self-produced, its more, evidence suggests that the cerebellum might be involved sensory consequences can be accurately predicted, and this in generating the prediction of the sensory consequences of prediction can be used to attenuate the sensory effects of the movement. Finally, recent evidence suggests that this predictive movement. Studies are reviewed that demonstrate that as the mechanism is abnormal in patients with auditory hallucinations discrepancy between predicted and actual sensory feedback and/or passivity experiences. NeuroReport 11:11±16 & 2000 increases during self-produced tactile stimulation there is a Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. concomitant decrease in the level of sensory attenuation and Key words: fMRI; Forward models; Schizophrenia; Tickling INTRODUCTION with the ®nger), the retinal location of objects changes, but Detecting the consequences of our own actions: We can the predicted eye position is not updated, leading to the readily distinguish between sensations that are produced perception that the world is moving. Prediction can also by our own movements and sensations that are caused by work in other sensory modalities to ®lter sensory informa- a change in the environment. This ability is important tion, attenuating the component that is due to self-move- because it enables us to pick out stimuli that correspond to ment (re-afference) from that due to changes in the outside potentially biologically signi®cant external events from world, and it is this use of prediction that forms the focus stimuli that arise simply as a consequence of our own of this review. In order to generate sensory predictions, it motor actions. It has been proposed that information about is postulated that the central nervous system contains a motor commands is used to distinguish the sensory con- central monitor [6] or internal `forward model' [3,10,11]. sequences of our own actions from externally produced Forward models mimic aspects of the external world sensory stimuli [1±5], giving us the ability to monitor and and the motor system in order to capture the forward or recognise as our own, self-generated limb movements, causal relationship between actions and their outcomes touch, speech and thoughts [6]. This kind of mechanism [2,10,12] (Fig. 1). An efference copy of the motor command can be used to maintain perceptual stability in the presence [8] is used to generate continuously predictions of the of self-produced movement. For example, during eye- sensory consequences (or corollary discharge [9]) of the movements an efference copy of the motor command is ongoing motor act. This prediction is then compared with used to predict the effects of the movement [7±9]. In order the actual sensory feedback (re-afference) from the move- to determine the location of an object relative to the head, ment. Self-produced sensations can be correctly predicted its retinal location and the gaze direction must be known. on the basis of motor commands, and there will therefore As the eye muscles are thought to contain no sensory be little or no sensory discrepancy resulting from the receptors used to determine the gaze direction, Helmholtz comparison between the predicted and actual sensory [7] proposed that the gaze direction is determined by feedback. This accurate prediction can be used to attenuate predicting the eye location based on the efference copy of the sensory effects of self-produced movement. In contrast, the motor command going to the eye muscles. Using this externally generated sensations are not associated with any estimate of eye position together with the object's retinal efference copy and therefore cannot be predicted by the location, the object's true position in space can be deter- forward model. By removing or attenuating the component mined. When the eye is moved without using the eye of sensory feedback that is due to self-produced movement muscles (for example by gently pressing on the eye lid it is possible to accentuate the feedback that is caused by 0959-4965 & Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Vol 11 No 11 3 August 2000 R11 NEUROREPORT S.J. BLAKEMORE, D. WOLPERT AND C. FRITH Predicted sensory feedback The perception of the sensory consequences of actions: (Corollary discharge) Evidence suggests that the sensory consequences of some Predictor self-generated movements are perceived differently from Efference an identical sensory input that is externally generated. An copy Sensory example of such differential perception is the phenomenon discrepancy ("tickliness") that people cannot tickle themselves [21,22]. In Weiskrantz et al.'s psychophysical study, a tactile stimulus that trans- Sensorimotor versed the sole of the subject's foot was administered either Motor command system Actual sensory feedback by the experimenter or the by the subject. Subjects rated the self-administered tactile stimulus as less tickly than the External influences externally administered tactile stimulus. When the experi- (e.g. delay) menter moved the subject's hand to tickle their foot, the tickle strength was reduced, but not to the level of the self- Fig. 1. A model for determining the sensory consequences of a move- administered tactile stimulus. The differences in response ment. An internal forward model makes predictions of the sensory were attributed to the mode of delivery: self-administered feedback based on the motor command. These predictions are then tactile stimulation produces both efference copy, in accor- compared with the actual sensory feedback. Self-produced sensations can be correctly predicted on the basis of the motor command and are dance with the motor command, and re-afference pro- associated with little or no sensory discrepancy resulting from the duced by the arm movement; passive arm movement comparison between predicted and actual sensory feedback. As the produces only re-afference, and externally administered sensory discrepancy from this comparison increases (for example by tactile stimulation produces neither efference copy nor re- increasing the delay or trajectory rotation between the movement and afference. The authors therefore concluded that although its sensory consequences) so does the likelihood that the sensation is re-afference plays a role, the signal used for attenuation is externally produced. By using such a system it is possible to cancel out the effects on sensation induced by self-motion and thereby distinguish based mainly on the efference copy signal produced in sensory events due to self-produced motion from the sensory feedback concordance with a self-generated movement. caused by the environment, such as contact with objects. One explanation of these results is that there is a general gating of all incoming sensory stimulation during self- generated movement. Indeed, this kind of sensory gating during movement has been documented in humans [23± external effects. This process therefore ®lters incoming 26]. For example, detection thresholds for an electrically sensory information for perhaps the more relevant com- induced twitch of the arm muscle are attenuated by ponent of information. voluntary movements of the stimulated arm [25]. Such ®ndings suggest that the perception of sensory stimulation Forward models in schizophrenia: Frith [6] proposed that might be attenuated simply if self-generated movement a defect in this kind of central 'self-monitoring' mechanism occurs simultaneously with the stimulus: the movement might underlie auditory hallucinations and passivity phe- might not necessarily have to produce the sensory stimulus nomena, which are '®rst rank' features in schizophrenia in order for it to be attenuated. This, however, is incon- [13]. Auditory hallucinations normally consist of hearing sistent with the theoretical approach of forward models we spoken voices [14,15]. The essence of passivity experiences have outlined, which posits that in order for sensory (or delusions of control) is that the subject experiences his attenuation to occur, the speci®c sensory consequences of or her will as replaced by that of some other force or the movement must be predicted accurately. According to agency [16]: 'My ®ngers pick up the pen, but I don't our hypothesis, the sensory stimulation would have to control them. What they do is nothing to do with me... The correspond to the movement producing it in order for force moved my lips. I began to speak. The words were perceptual attenuation to occur. If this hypothesis is true, made for me' [17]. there are two further possibilities. First, the sensory stimu- Frith has suggested that these abnormal experiences lation might have to correspond
Recommended publications
  • (Title of the Thesis)*
    THE OPTIMALITY OF DECISION MAKING DURING MOTOR LEARNING by Joshua Brent Moskowitz A thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (June, 2016) Copyright ©Joshua B. Moskowitz, 2016 Abstract In our daily lives, we often must predict how well we are going to perform in the future based on an evaluation of our current performance and an assessment of how much we will improve with practice. Such predictions can be used to decide whether to invest our time and energy in learning and, if we opt to invest, what rewards we may gain. This thesis investigated whether people are capable of tracking their own learning (i.e. current and future motor ability) and exploiting that information to make decisions related to task reward. In experiment one, participants performed a target aiming task under a visuomotor rotation such that they initially missed the target but gradually improved. After briefly practicing the task, they were asked to selected rewards for hits and misses applied to subsequent performance in the task, where selecting a higher reward for hits came at a cost of receiving a lower reward for misses. We found that participants made decisions that were in the direction of optimal and therefore demonstrated knowledge of future task performance. In experiment two, participants learned a novel target aiming task in which they were rewarded for target hits. Every five trials, they could choose a target size which varied inversely with reward value. Although participants’ decisions deviated from optimal, a model suggested that they took into account both past performance, and predicted future performance, when making their decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Play and Responses to Tickling in Male Juvenile Rats
    Scotland's Rural College Relationships between play and responses to tickling in male juvenile rats Hammond, TJH; Bombail, Vincent; Nielsen, Birte L; Meddle, Simone L; Lawrence, AB; Brown, Sarah M Published in: Applied Animal Behaviour Science DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104879 Print publication: 01/12/2019 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Hammond, TJH., Bombail, V., Nielsen, B. L., Meddle, S. L., Lawrence, AB., & Brown, S. M. (2019). Relationships between play and responses to tickling in male juvenile rats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 221, [104879]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104879 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 Journal Pre-proof Relationships between play and responses
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Corticospinal Control of Muscles
    Flexible Corticospinal Control of Muscles Najja J. Marshall Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2021 Najja J. Marshall All Rights Reserved Abstract Flexible Corticospinal Control of Muscles Najja J. Marshall The exceptional abilities of top-tier athletes – from Simone Biles’ dizzying gymnastics to LeBron James’ gravity-defying bounds – can easily lead one to forget to marvel at the exceptional breadth of everyday movements. Whether holding a cup of coffee, reaching out to grab a falling object, or cycling at a quick clip, every motor action requires activating multiple muscles with the appropriate intensity and timing to move each limb or counteract the weight of an object. These actions are planned and executed by the motor cortex, which transmits its intentions to motoneurons in the spinal cord, which ultimately drive muscle contractions. A central problem in neuroscience is precisely how neural activity in cortex and the spinal cord gives rise to this diverse range of behaviors. At the level of spinal cord, this problem is considered to be well understood. A foundational tenet in motor control asserts that motoneurons are controlled by a single input to which they respond in a reliable and predictable manner to drive muscle activity, akin to the way that depressing a gas pedal by the same degree accelerates a car to a predictable speed. Theories of how motor cortex flexibly generates different behaviors are less firmly developed, but the available evidence indicates that cortical neurons are coordinated in a similarly simplistic, well-preserved manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Volume LXXIX: Cognition
    This is a free sample of content from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Volume LXXIX: Cognition. Click here for more information on how to buy the book. COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME LXXIX Cognition symposium.cshlp.org Symposium organizers and Proceedings editors: Cori Bargmann (The Rockefeller University), Daphne Bavelier (University of Geneva, Switzerland, and University of Rochester), Terrence Sejnowski (The Salk Institute for Biological Studies), and David Stewart and Bruce Stillman (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY PRESS 2014 © 2014 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. All rights reserved. This is a free sample of content from Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Volume LXXIX: Cognition. Click here for more information on how to buy the book. COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME LXXIX # 2014 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press International Standard Book Number 978-1-621821-26-7 (cloth) International Standard Book Number 978-1-621821-27-4 (paper) International Standard Serial Number 0091-7451 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 34-8174 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY Founded in 1933 by REGINALD G. HARRIS Director of the Biological Laboratory 1924 to 1936 Previous Symposia Volumes I (1933) Surface Phenomena XXXIX (1974) Tumor Viruses II (1934) Aspects of Growth XL (1975) The Synapse III (1935) Photochemical Reactions XLI (1976) Origins
    [Show full text]
  • Toolmaking and the Origin of Normative Cognition
    Preprint, 14 April 2020 Toolmaking and the Origin of Normative Cognition Jonathan Birch Department of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. [email protected] http://personal.lse.ac.uk/birchj1 11,947 words 1 Abstract: We are all guided by thousands of norms, but how did our capacity for normative cognition evolve? I propose there is a deep but neglected link between normative cognition and practical skill. In modern humans, complex motor skills and craft skills, such as skills related to toolmaking and tool use, are guided by internally represented norms of correct performance. Moreover, it is plausible that core components of human normative cognition evolved in response to the distinctive demands of transmitting complex motor skills and craft skills, especially skills related to toolmaking and tool use, through social learning. If this is correct, the expansion of the normative domain beyond technique to encompass more abstract norms of reciprocity, ritual, kinship and fairness involved the elaboration of a basic platform for the guidance of skilled action by technical norms. This article motivates and defends this “skill hypothesis” for the origin of normative cognition and sets out various ways in which it could be empirically tested. Key words: normative cognition, skill, cognitive control, norms, evolution 2 1. The Skill Hypothesis We are all guided by thousands of norms, often without being able to articulate the norms in question. A “norm”, as I will use the term here, is just any standard of correct or appropriate behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Investigators March 2011
    Wellcome Trust Investigator Awards Feedback from Expert Review Group members 28 March 2011 1 Roughly 7 months between application and final outcome The Expert Review Groups 1. Cell and Developmental Biology 2. Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (Zaf Bashir) 3. Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health 4. Genetics, Genomics and Population Research (George Davey Smith) 5. Immune Systems in Health and Disease (David Wraith) 6. Molecular Basis of Cell Function 7. Pathogen Biology and Disease Transmission 8. Physiology in Health and Disease (Paul Martin) 9. Population and Public Health (Rona Campbell) 2 Summary Feedback from ERG Panels • The bar is very high across all nine panels • Track record led - CV must demonstrate a substantial impact of your research (e.g. high impact journals, record of ground breaking research, clear upward trajectory etc) To paraphrase Walport ‘to support scientists with the best track records, obviously appropriate to the stage in their career’ • Notable esteem factors (but note ‘several FRSs were not shortlisted’) • Your novelty of your research vision is CRUCIAL. Don’t just carry on doing more of the same • The Trust is not averse to risk (but what about ERG panel members?) • Success rate for short-listing for interview is ~15-25% at Senior Investigator level (3-5 proposals shortlisted from each ERG) • Fewer New Investigator than Senior Investigator applications – an opportunity? • There are fewer applications overall for the second round, but ‘the bar will not be lowered’ The Challenge UoB has roughly 45 existing
    [Show full text]
  • Why Dream? a Conjecture on Dreaming
    Why dream? A Conjecture on Dreaming Marshall Stoneham London Centre for Nanotechnology University College London Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK PACS classifications: 87.19.-j Properties of higher organisms; 87.19.L- Neuroscience; 87.18.-h Biological complexity Abstract I propose that the need for sleep and the occurrence of dreams are intimately linked to the physical processes underlying the continuing replacement of cells and renewal of biomolecules during the lives of higher organisms. Since one major function of our brains is to enable us to react to attack, there must be truly compelling reasons for us to take them off-line for extended periods, as during sleep. I suggest that most replacements occur during sleep. Dreams are suggested as part of the means by which the new neural circuitry (I use the word in an informal sense) is checked. 1. Introduction Sleep is a remarkably universal phenomenon among higher organisms. Indeed, many of them would die without sleep. Whereas hibernation, a distinct phenomenon, is readily understood in terms of energy balance, the reasons for sleep and for associated dreaming are by no means fully established. Indeed, some of the standard ideas are arguably implausible [1]. This present note describes a conjecture as to the role of dreaming. The ideas, in turn, point to a further conjecture about the need for sleep. I have tried to avoid any controversial assumptions. All I assume about the brain is that it comprises a complex and (at least partly) integrated network of components, and has several functions, including the obvious ones of control of motion, analysis of signals from sensors, computing (in the broadest sense), memory, and possibly other functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book
    2 16 HBM GENEVA 22ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING PROGRAM June 26-30, 2016 Palexpo Exhibition and Congress Centre | Geneva, Switzerland Simultaneous Multi-Slice Accelerate advanced neuro applications for clinical routine siemens.com/sms Simultaneous Multi-Slice is a paradigm shift in MRI Simulataneous Multi-Slice helps you to: acquisition – helping to drastically cut neuro DWI 1 scan times, and improving temporal resolution for ◾ reduce imaging time for diffusion MRI by up to 68% BOLD fMRI significantly. ◾ bring advanced DTI and BOLD into clinical routine ◾ push the limits in brain imaging research with 1 MAGNETOM Prisma, Head/Neck 64 acceleration factors up to 81 2 3654_MR_Ads_SMS_7,5x10_Zoll_DD.indd 1 24.03.16 09:45 WELCOME We would like to personally welcome each of you to the 22nd Annual Meeting TABLE OF CONTENTS of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping! The world of neuroimaging technology is more exciting today than ever before, and we’ll continue our Welcome Remarks . .3 tradition of bringing inspiration to you through the exceptional scientific sessions, General Information ..................6 poster presentations and networking forums that ensure you remain at the Registration, Exhibit Hours, Social Events, cutting edge. Speaker Ready Room, Hackathon Room, Evaluations, Mobile App, CME Credits, etc. Here is but a glimpse of what you can expect and what we hope to achieve over Daily Schedule ......................10 the next few days. Sunday, June 26: • Talairach Lecture presenter Daniel Wolpert, Univ. Cambridge UK, who Educational Courses Full Day:........10 will share his work on how humans learn to make skilled movements MR Diffusion Imaging: From the Basics covering probabilistic models of learning, the role and content in activating to Advanced Applications ............10 motor memories and the intimate interaction between decision making and Anatomy and Its Impact on Structural and Functional Imaging ..................11 sensorimotor control.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cambridge Research Horizons Issue 5
    HORIZONSRESEARCH In this issue THE THINKING MACHINE? plus news and views from across the University University of Cambridge research magazine www.rsd.cam.ac.uk Issue 5 | Spring 2008 EDITORIAL DR DENIS BURDAKOV COMMITTEE COURTESY OF THE CAMBRIDGE GREEK PLAY Foreword A Happy New Year to all of our readers and contributors! This issue coincides with a double celebration for Research Services Division, as we mark five years of Horizon Seminars and the twentieth in the series: ‘The Thinking Machine?’ on 18 March. Not only do these events provide a forum for showcasing interdisciplinary research at Cambridge, but also excellent Orchestrating brain Greek tragedy: setting networking opportunities for activity the stage today speakers and delegates alike. Our front cover shows Dr Máté Lengyel from the Department of Engineering ‘in search of lost Contents memories’. In the Spotlight section, Research News 3–7 he describes how the intriguing Recent stories from across the University process of memory storage and recall is being revealed by computational neuroscience. We Spotlight: The Thinking Machine? 8–17 also hear from computer scientists Modelling uncertainty in the game of Go 9 who are modelling how humans In search of lost memories 10 resolve ambiguities in language and use diagrams for reasoning. We Can machines read? 12 contemplate why it has been so Can machines reason? 13 hard to program a computer to play Orchestrating brain activity 14 the ancient Chinese game of Go. We consider how the brain The thinking hominid 16 orchestrates the ‘daily dance’ of sleep and wakefulness, and we Preview 18–19 look back a million years to ask Greek tragedy: setting the stage today when mankind first showed evidence of a thinking brain.
    [Show full text]
  • ''Laughing'' Rats and the Evolutionary Antecedents of Human Joy?
    Physiology & Behavior 79 (2003) 533–547 ‘‘Laughing’’ rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy? Jaak Pankseppa,b,*, Jeff Burgdorf a aDepartment of Psychology, J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA bFalk Center for Molecular Therapeutics, Northwestern University Research Park, 1801 Maple Avenue, Suite 4306, Evanston, IL 60201, USA Received 4 April 2003; accepted 17 April 2003 Abstract Paul MacLean’s concept of epistemics—the neuroscientific study of subjective experience—requires animal brain research that can be related to predictions concerning the internal experiences of humans. Especially robust relationships come from studies of the emotional/ affective processes that arise from subcortical brain systems shared by all mammals. Recent affective neuroscience research has yielded the discovery of play- and tickle-induced ultrasonic vocalization patterns ( 50-kHz chirps) in rats may have more than a passing resemblance to primitive human laughter. In this paper, we summarize a dozen reasons for the working hypothesis that such rat vocalizations reflect a type of positive affect that may have evolutionary relations to the joyfulness of human childhood laughter commonly accompanying social play. The neurobiological nature of human laughter is discussed, and the relevance of such ludic processes for understanding clinical disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD), addictive urges and mood imbalances are discussed. D 2003 Published
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics
    mr05_Article 1 3/28/05 3:25 PM Page 9 Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XLIII (March 2005), pp. 9–64 Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics ∗ COLIN CAMERER, GEORGE LOEWENSTEIN, and DRAZEN PRELEC Who knows what I want to do? Who knows what anyone wants to do? How can you be sure about something like that? Isn’t it all a question of brain chemistry, signals going back and forth, electrical energy in the cortex? How do you know whether something is really what you want to do or just some kind of nerve impulse in the brain. Some minor little activity takes place somewhere in this unimportant place in one of the brain hemispheres and suddenly I want to go to Montana or I don’t want to go to Montana. (White Noise, Don DeLillo) 1. Introduction such as finance, game theory, labor econom- ics, public finance, law, and macroeconomics In the last two decades, following almost a (see Colin Camerer and George Loewenstein century of separation, economics has begun 2004). Behavioral economics has mostly been to import insights from psychology. informed by a branch of psychology called “Behavioral economics” is now a prominent “behavioral decision research,” but other fixture on the intellectual landscape and has cognitive sciences are ripe for harvest. Some spawned applications to topics in economics, important insights will surely come from neu- roscience, either directly or because neuro- ∗ Camerer: California Institute of Technology. science will reshape what is believed about Loewenstein: Carnegie Mellon University. Prelec: psychology which in turn informs economics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMOR, TICKLE, and PAIN Facial Expressions, Smile Types, and Self
    Facial Expressions 1 Running head: HUMOR, TICKLE, AND PAIN Facial Expressions, Smile Types, and Self-report during Humor, Tickle, and Pain: An Examination of Socrates’ Hypothesis Christine R. Harris Psychology Department University of California, San Diego Nancy Alvarado Center for Human Information Processing University of California, San Diego Author Contact: Christine R. Harris, Ph.D. Department of Psychology - 0109 University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0109 Phone: (858) 822-4507 Email: [email protected] Word Count (main text and footnotes): 4028 Facial Expressions 2 Key words: emotion, facial expressions, laughter, humor, pain, tickling Facial Expressions 3 Abstract The nature of ticklish smiling and the possible emotional state that accompanies it have been pondered since the ancient Greeks. Socrates proposed that tickle induced pleasure and pain. Others, including Darwin, have claimed that ticklish laughter is virtually the same as humorous laughter. The present study is the first to systematically examine facial behavior and self-reports of emotion in response to tickling. Using a within-subjects design, 84 subjects’ responses to being tickled were compared to their responses when experiencing a painful stimulus and their responses to comedy. Overall results for both self-report and facial action coding showed that the tickle condition elicited both pleasure and displeasure. Facial action during tickling included “Duchenne” smiles plus movements associated with negative emotions. Results suggest that tickle-induced smiling can be dissociated from positive affect. Tickle may be a type of complex reflex or fixed-action pattern. Facial Expressions 4 Facial Expressions, Smile Types, and Self-report during Humor, Tickle, and Pain: An Examination of Socrates’ Hypothesis Tickling and the smiling it induces, at first blush, seem like child’s play.
    [Show full text]