DOCSLIB.ORG

LD169 Barrow Port Area Action Plan July 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LD169 Barrow Port Area Action Plan July 2010 DDeevveellooppmmeenntt PPllaann DDooccuummeenntt B a r r o w P o r t A r e a A c t i o n P l a n J u l y 2 0 1 0 B a r r o w - i n - F u r n e s s B o r o u g h C o u n c i l Part of the Barrow-in-Furness Local Development Framework Barrow-in-Furness Local Development Framework Barrow Port Area Action Plan - July 2010 Barrow Port Area Action Plan Development Plan Document: Adopted 12 July 2010 Director of Regeneration & Community Services Barrow-in-Furness Borough Council Town Hall Duke Street Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria LA14 2LD Contact: Local Development Framework Team E-mail: [email protected] Barrow-in-Furness Local Development Framework Barrow Port Area Action Plan - July 2010 Aerial view of part of the Action Plan Area looking south west across the Marina Village site and Ramsden and Buccleuch Docks towards the Waterfront Opportunity Area and Walney Channel beyond Aerial view of part of the Action Plan Area looking east across Salthouse Mills and Cavendish Dock Barrow-in-Furness Local Development Framework Barrow Port Area Action Plan - July 2010 Contents Page No. Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Barrow & the Port Action Plan Area.................................................................. 1 1.2 The Local Development Framework ................................................................. 1 1.3 The Barrow Port Area Action Plan .................................................................... 1 1.4 The Area Action Plan Structure and Aims.......................................................... 6 Section 2: The Action Plan Area Today.......................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Historical Evolution ....................................................................................... 7 2.3 Land Use ..................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Socio-Economic Profile..................................................................................13 2.5 Environmental Quality ..................................................................................17 Section 3: Strategic Vision and Objectives.................................................. 25 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................25 3.2 Strategic Vision & Objectives .........................................................................25 3.3 Spatial Strategy...........................................................................................28 Section 4: Area Wide Policies..................................................................... 31 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................31 4.2 Promoting Comprehensive Development .........................................................31 4.3 Development Quality & Sustainability .............................................................31 4.4 Environmental Protection & Enhancement........................................................34 4.5 Housing Development & Phasing ....................................................................37 4.6 Economy, Employment & Tourism Development ...............................................40 4.7 Retail Development ......................................................................................43 4.8 Transport & Infrastructure.............................................................................45 4.9 Developer Contributions................................................................................50 Section 5: Opportunity Areas & Key Sites ................................................... 53 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................53 5.2 Marina Village Opportunity Area .....................................................................55 Key Site 1 – Barrow Marina (M1, M2, M3, M4)...............................................................57 Key Site 2 – Marina Village Housing .............................................................................63 Key Site 3 – Land at Cavendish Dock (CD1, CD2) ..........................................................81 Key Site 4 – Barrow Watersports Centre.......................................................................87 Key Site 5 – Salthouse Housing...................................................................................93 5.3 The Waterfront Gateway Opportunity Area ....................................................101 Key Site 6 – Waterfront Business Park .......................................................................103 Key Site 7 – Barrow Island Housing (BIH1, BIH2, BIH3) ...............................................117 Section 6: Implementation & Monitoring .................................................. 127 6.1 Implementing the Area Action Plan...............................................................127 6.2 Targets, Monitoring & Evaluation..................................................................129 Appendices ............................................................................................... 139 Appendix 1: Glossary & Abbreviations ........................................................................140 Appendix 2: List of Background Documents ................................................................144 Appendix 3: Relationship to Other Plans and Strategies ................................................146 Appendix 4: List of Superseded Policies......................................................................156 Maps used in this publication are based on Ordnance Survey material with the kind permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Barrow Borough Council Licence No LA100016831. © A The 2005 Aerial Photography is provided by Barrow Borough Council under licence from GeoPerspectives, and is copyrighted to GeoPerspectives. Copyright of other images Barrow Borough Council unless stated otherwise. Barrow-in-Furness Local Development Framework Barrow Port Area Action Plan - July 2010 List of Tables and Figures Figure 1: Barrow Local Development Framework...................................................... 2 Figure 2: The Area Action Plan Process ................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Historic Plans ........................................................................................ 8 Figure 4: Extract from Proposals Map © ................................................................29 Figure 5: Local Plan and RSS Net Additional Dwelling Requirements Compared............38 Figure 6: Proposed Phasing..................................................................................40 Figure 7: Marina Village Opportunity Area © A .......................................................55 Figure 8: Barrow Marina © A ...............................................................................57 Figure 9 : Marina Village Housing © A ....................................................................63 Figure 10: St George’s Square Conservation Area with Listed Buildings........................65 Figure 11: Marina and Marina Village Character Areas ...............................................70 Figure 12: Illustrative Public Realm Layout ..............................................................76 Figure 13: Land at Cavendish Dock © A ..................................................................81 Figure 14: Barrow Watersports Centre © A..............................................................87 Figure 15: Salthouse Housing © A..........................................................................93 Figure 16: The Waterfront Gateway Opportunity Area © A .......................................101 Figure 17: Waterfront Business Park © A ..............................................................103 Figure 18: Waterfront Business Park Character Areas ..............................................108 Figure 19: Aerial View of Waterfront Business Park Spine Road under construction ......109 Figure 20: Barrow Island Housing © A ..................................................................117 Figure 21: Barrow Island Conservation Area ..........................................................118 Figure 22: Aerial View of Site BIH2 © A ................................................................123 List of Policies Policy BP SV1: Strategic Vision for Barrow Port Area ......................................................26 Policy BP SV2: Spatial Strategy for Barrow Port Area Action Plan .....................................29 Policy BP 1: Promoting Comprehensive Development ..................................................31 Policy BP 2: Development Quality & Sustainability.......................................................32 Policy BP 3: Removal of Permitted Development Rights ...............................................33 Policy BP 4: Conservation & Enhancement of the Natural & Built Environment.................35 Policy BP 5: Environmental Management ...................................................................36 Policy BP 6: Phasing of New Housing.........................................................................40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND Farm O P Violet Pit (Dis) Pond D
    SHEET 9, MAP 9 Proposed electoral division boundaries in Barrow-in-Furness borough Pond A Ethel Pit 5 9 (dis) 5 Sandscale Haws (Nature Reserve) Roanhead Housethwaite Peggy Pit Iron Mines Pond Hill (dis) South Lakes (disused) 90 Pond Wild Animal Park 5 k A c e B Chapel Hills a Sandscale k a THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Farm o P Violet Pit (dis) Pond D i s DALTON NORTH ED nel m n ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CUMBRIA ll l Tu a Gi inda n Pit No 2 agg L t H l (17) e (dis) d Ponds Tip R a i l w ASKAM AND IRELETH CP Gill a Dub Nursery Final recommendations for electoral division y boundaries in DALTON NORTH WARD Maidenlands Elliscales P Rickett Quarry the county of Cumbria July 2012 Quarry o Hills a LINDAL AND MARTON CP Pond k (dis) (dis) a B e c Maidenlands Sheet 9 of 9 k Hawthwaite 'S N Farm House E Re L Elliscale Farm d Gutter E H T S Allotment Allotment HA Gardens Sports WTHWAITE Gardens LANE D Field D A A O O R R N O M T Our Lady of G A H This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of K George Romney G o S U The Rosary RC l d A Junior School O the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. m R Primary School B i r Golf e T Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING COMMITTEE 25 November 2008
    PLANNING COMMITTEE th 25 November 2008 PLAN NUMBER: APPLICANT: AGENT: 2008/1008 Atherton Development Mr M Gadsden M & P Gadsden Consulting Engineers WARD/PARISH: CASE OFFICER: DATE RECEIVED: Dalton North Ian Sim 28/10/2008 Askam & Ireleth Parish 01229 876384 STATUTORY DATE: Council 22/12/2008 LOCATION: Land off Lord Street, Askam-in-Furness PROPOSAL: Erection of 6 No. dwellings and a detached garage with new access road and improvement to existing road SAVED POLICIES OF THE FORMER LOCAL PLAN: POLICY B3 Applications for residential development on unallocated sites will be permitted where they accord with the sequential approach of the Structure Plan and also satisfy the following criteria: i) The site is located within the built up area of existing settlements or the development cordons identified in Policy B13; and ii) The siting, scale, layout and design (in the materials and form of the buildings) of the development is sensitive to the local environment, it promotes the principles of ‘Secure by Design’ and adequate parking provision is made; and iii) Adequate access arrangements can be provided, including servicing the site by the public transport and by cycle routes; and iv) The development is laid out in a way that maximises energy efficiency; and v) The development will not result in the loss of land which has a recognised or established nature conservation interest; and vi) The development must not cause an undue increase in traffic passing through existing residential areas such as to be detrimental to residential amenity or highway safety; and Page 1 of 35 PLANNING COMMITTEE th 25 November 2008 vii) Adequate water supplies, foul and surface water sewers and sewerage treatment facilities exist or can be provided; and viii) 'A risk-based approach will be adopted for development in or affecting flood risk areas to minimise the risk of flooding associated with the site and the potential effect development of the site might have elsewhere through increased run off or a reduction in the capacity of flood plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement to Date Presentation
    Engagement to Date Presentation Morecambe Bay CCG Aims and Objectives This presentation will highlight the engagement activities carried out on behalf of Morecambe Bay CCG. Summer 2018 continued We continue to support the Carnforth Community Choir which is a community led initiative where people use singing to improve their physical, mental and emotional health. The Choir was set up by a member of the community, following a series of public events organised by Morecambe Bay CCG. The group has gone from strength to strength and recently put on a sell out concert raising £800 for the local Samaritans. Summer 2018 continued • Members of Morecambe Bay CCG continue to attend the South Lakeland Health and Wellbeing Forum which includes members from organisations in the public sector, county council, schools and third sector organisations – in order to encourage partnership working and share knowledge and resources across the area. • The July meeting included an extended discussion about the NHS Integrated Care Communities and the County Councils’ Community Wellbeing Groups; looking at how we can work better together and have a more joined up approach. Summer 2018 continued • Following a long period of high temperatures, members of the team at Morecambe Bay CCG produced and shared a press release advising the public on how to stay safe in the heat this summer. Read the full article: https://bit.ly/2lS2RMY Morecambe Bay CCG supported the Cumbria Police domestic abuse awareness campaign which ran throughout the World Cup. The campaign involved sharing the message of ‘Love the Game, Love your Family’ which underlines that no matter what the result, football should never lead a person subjecting loved ones to abuse or violence.
    [Show full text]
  • North West Inshore and Offshore Marine Plan Areas
    Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the North West Inshore and Offshore marine plan areas September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Marshall Paul Macrae 1.0 Paul Macrae Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris MMO Comments Graham, David Hutchinson 2.0 Paul Macrae Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Independent QA Sweeting © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Lancashire
    Bare, Lancashire Record ID 236 Authors Year Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., 1998 Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. Location description Deposit location SD 443 649 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Peat layer (often <1 m thick, hard, consolidated, dry, laminated deposit). Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Boreholes SD46 SW/52-54 Depth of deposit 14C ages available -10 m OD No Notes Bibliographic reference Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. 1998 'Geology of the country around Lancaster', Memoir for 1:50,000 geological sheet 59 (England and Wales), . Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 31 Bare, Lancashire Record ID 237 Authors Year Crofton, A. 1876 Location description Deposit location SD 445 651 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Peat horizon resting on blue organic clay. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available No Notes Crofton (1876) referred to in Brandon et al (1998). Possibly same layer as mentioned by Reade (1904). Bibliographic reference Crofton, A. 1876 'Drift, peat etc. of Heysman [Heysham], Morecambe Bay', Transactions of the Manchester Geological Society, 14, 152-154. Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 2 of 31 Carnforth coastal area, Lancashire Record ID 245 Authors Year Brandon, A., Aitkenhead, N., Crofts, R., 1998 Ellison, R., Evans, D. and Riley, N. Location description Deposit location SD 4879 6987 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Coastal peat up to 4.9 m thick. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Borehole SD 46 NE/1 Depth of deposit 14C ages available Varying from near-surface to at-surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Slyne-With-Hest, Lancaster
    LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION – SLYNE-WITH-HEST PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL SLYNE-WITH-HEST, LANCASTER Provided for: Lancaster City Council Date: February 2016 Provided by: The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Clarence Arcade Stamford Street Ashton-under-Lyne Tameside OL6 7PT Tel: 0161 342 4409 LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST QUALITY ASSURANCE Author Suzanne Waymont CIEEM Checked By Stephen Atkins Approved By Derek Richardson Version 1.0 Draft for Comment Reference LSA - 4 The survey was carried out in accordance with the Phase 1 habitat assessment methods (JNCC 2010) and Guidelines for Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (CIEEM 2013). All works associated with this report have been undertaken in accordance with the Code of Professional Conduct for the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. (www.cieem.org.uk) LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SURVEY BRIEF 1.2 SITE LOCATION & PROPOSAL 1.3 PERSONNEL 2 LEGISLATION AND POLICY 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 DESK STUDY 3.2 FIELD SURVEY 3.3 SURVEY LIMITATIONS 4 BASELINE ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 4.1 DESKTOP SEARCH 4.2 SURVEY RESULTS 5 ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS – IMPLICATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 6 CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX 1 – DATA SEARCH RESULTS APPENDIX 2 – DESIGNATED SITES APPENDIX 3 – BIOLOGICAL HERITAGE SITES LSA – 4 FEBRUARY 2016 LANCASTER SITE ALLOCATION - SLYNE-WITH-HEST SUMMARY • A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal was commissioned by Lancaster City Council to identify possible ecological constraints that could affect the development of 8 sites and areas currently being considered as new site allocations under its Local Plan. This report looks at one of these sites: Slyne-with-Hest.
    [Show full text]
  • River Frontage
    PORT OF BARROW-IN-FURNESS Site: Site size (Available land area etc): • South Side of Ramsden Dock = Lay down and storage area of 18 – 20 acres • North Side of Anchor Line Basin = Lay down and storage area of 10 – 12 acres • Additional land adjacent to Port Estate available Details of wet and dry dock facilities/ river frontage/ site quayside accessibility: • Approx 500m of general quay frontage • A further 500m (approx) of quay frontage with heavy lift capability • BAE Systems Shipbuilding Facility partly located within port estate. Buildings and warehousing: • 6000m2 warehouse on site • Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate offers opportunities for new buildings and warehouse facility. Maximum Vessel capacity (length, width, draught (m)): • Length = up to 200 metres (subject to certain criteria for vessels over 170m LOA) • Beam = Dock entrance width = 36 metres • Draught = variable but typically up to 8 metres or more • No.1 Dock Gate opens 2.5 hours before high water, closes at high water or shortly after. Nearby industrial sites (approx. distance from port) vacant or otherwise: • Vacant Waterfront Business Park adjacent to port estate = approx 40 acres Location, Transport and Connections - Location i.e. nearest cities/industrial areas: • Barrow-in-Furness Town Centre = 1.5km away from the port • Lancaster = 75km • Preston = 108km • Manchester = 160km Major road, rail, water and air transport links: • A590 – From Barrow = 50km to M6 Motorway • Rail – Dock rail link to Furness Line which is connected to West Coast main Line
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEMES for the RECLAMATION of LAND from the SEA in NORTH LANCASHIRE DURING the EIGHTEENTH and NINETEENTH CENTURIES Read 20 Febr
    SCHEMES FOR THE RECLAMATION OF LAND FROM THE SEA IN NORTH LANCASHIRE DURING THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES BY WILLIAM ROLLINSON, M.A. Read 20 February 1964 OME of the earliest schemes for the reclamation of land S from the sea in North Lancashire were implemented by the monks of Furness Abbey in the thirteenth century. In the fervour of Cistercian colonisation and agricultural reclamation, several areas on Walney Island were reclaimed by the construction of embankments or dykes of beach pebbles. There is some evidence to suggest that several of these dykes were constructed on both the west and east coasts of the island, but only the great Biggar Dyke on the east coast remains today, the west coast embank­ ments having been destroyed by marine erosion. Extending for almost a mile north-west of the village of Biggar, the dyke protected part of the east coast of Walney and prevented inundation of low-lying ground during spring tides. During the medieval period it was maintained and repaired by the monastic tenants in Furness, but after the dissolution of the abbey in 1537 the responsibility was assumed by the Crown, and in 1564 by the inhabitants of Walney. In spite of such an early and promising beginning, the progress of land reclamation and agricultural development was retarded after the dissolution, and it was not until the eighteenth century and the period of the Agricultural Revolution that interest was again aroused. Under the stimulus of a rapidly growing urban market and a rise in the price of grain during the Napoleonic wars, the period between the mid-eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was one of agricultural expansion and improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
    VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens
    [Show full text]
  • Ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST of PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES by WIRELESS
    — l i ­ ve — LISTE DES PORTS ACCEPTANT LES MESSAGES INTERNATIONAUX DE QUARANTAINE PAR RADIO V. — LIST OF PORTS ACCEPTING INTERNATIONAL QUARANTINE MESSAGES BY WIRELESS Nom du Port* — Cir­ Adresse télégraphique de Détails sur la Station de Noms et adresses des Agents Renseigne­ conscription adminis­ l'Autorité saintoire du Port réception des messages habilités pour recevoir et trans­ m ents com­ trative (entre paren­ et Indicatif d'appel* mettre les messages plementaires thèses) voir page. [Réponse à Question Sjf [Réponse à Question 3]t [Réponse à Question 3 ] t [Réponse à Question 4]t Name of Port* — Admi­ Telegraphic Address of Port Particulars of receiving Names and addresses of approved Supplemen­ nistrative Local Area Health Authority Station accepting messa­ Agents for receiving and trans­ tary Infor­ (between bracketsJ ges and signal call • mitting messages mation [Reply to Question. 2] t [Reply to Question a] T [Reply to Question 4 ]t see p age' [Reply to Question 311 1 * o 3 * 4 5 AFRIQUE — AFRICA AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE FRANÇAISE — FRENCH WEST AFRICA Dakar I A g e n t p r i n c i p a l S a n t é I Dakar côtier I Aucun (None) 23 I D a k a r 1 | CONGO BELGE — BELGIAN CONGO Banana j S a n i p o r t B a n a n a j — j Aucun (None) 23 CÔTE FRANÇAISE DES SOMALIS — FRENCH SOMALILAND Djibouti I S e r v i c e quarantenaire I — I Aucun (None) 24 D j i b o u t i | I ILE MAURICE — MAURITIUS Port Louis P o r t H e a l t h O f f i c e r 1 — 1 None (Aucun) 24 P o r t L o u i s | I RÉUNION Port des Galets S x n té m a r it im e I Saint-Denis I Aucun (None) 25 P o r t d e s G a l e t s | Reunion | SIERRA LEONE Freetown H e a l t h F r e e t o w n Freetown None (Aucun) 25 Cable and Wireless Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNINGProjects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVEDProjects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERSProjects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTSApproved projects at main contract awarded stage. Planning authority: Rugby Job: Detailed Pawnshop Passage, Mercer Row, Louth, Client: Gracewell Healthcare Ltd Agent: Church Street, Altrincham, Greater Education Agent: Norwich City College of GrimsbyInstituteofFurther&,Laceby units Client: Lazarus Properties Ltd Plans Submitted for 9 flats & 3 townhouses Lincolnshire, LN11 9JQ Tel: 01507 611155 Gelder & Kitchen LLP, Rosner Studios, 28a Manchester, WA14 4DW Contractor: Further & Higher Education, Norwich City RoadHigherEducationNunsCorner Developer: MPSL Planning & Design Ltd, MIDLANDS/ Client: Mr. Richard Overton Agent: H B PETERBOROUGH £1.7M Market Place, Richmond, North Yorkshire, Calderpeel, Market Court, 20 - 24 Church College, Ipswich Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR2 Planning authority: North East Lincolnshire Commercial House, 14 West Point Enterprise Architects, 17 Warwick Street, Rugby, CrownRecordsManagement,Mallard DL10 4QG Tender return date: Tenders are Street, Altrincham, Greater Manchester, WA14 2LJ Contractor: Graham Construction, 5 Job: Detailed Plans Submitted for theatre/ Park, Clarence Avenue, Trafford Park, EAST ANGLIA Warwickshire, CV21 3DH Tel: 01788 576137 RoadBretton currently invited. The tender return date is 4DW Tel: 0161 929 7622 Ballygowan Road, Hillsborough, Co Down,
    [Show full text]
  • With a Lack of Investment in Technology for a Decade, This Is How a Community-Based Primary School Caught up and Are Now in a St
    With a lack of investment in technology for a decade, this is how a community-based Primary School caught up and are now in a strong position to improve the education of all of their pupils The background Vickerstown Primary and Brambles Nursery School is a beautiful setting in the idyllic coastal town of Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria in North West England. Given the remote location, employment can be limited, so the school is seen as a beacon in the local environment. This is reflected in a clear vision to provide an outstanding education at the heart of their community, making every effort for the children at Vickerstown to have the best academic start and grounding possible to enable them to become successful members of society. The 159 pupils come from a mixed catchment – some with Education, Health and Care Plans – bringing added obligations on the staff to help ensure all children receive the very best care and support. The school has a proven local reputation for the support they provide to children with autism. The challenge Vickerstown Primary moved to new purpose-built premises in 2011 and received significant investment to help embed the use of technology in teaching and learning across the school at that time. However, since then – almost 10 years ago – there has been very little further investment in technology, and a technical audit undertaken in February 2020 concluded: • the underlying server operating systems and the majority of user device operating systems were unsupported and posed a potential security risk • student devices were aging and impacting the learning within the school.
    [Show full text]