Independent Media Second Edition: 2012 U.S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE UNIVERSITY of TORONTO: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP and IMPACT the University of Toronto Is One of the World’S Leading Institutions of Higher Learning
Winter 2021 ∙ utoronto.ca THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AND IMPACT The University of Toronto is one of the world’s leading institutions of higher learning. Our tri-campus system is renowned internationally for groundbreaking research and innovative teaching that provides students with a comprehensive global education. We drive economic growth and promote social well-being around the globe. Published January 2021. All data is University of Toronto generated, unless otherwise noted. A Worldwide Network of Excellence 2 Areas of Research Excellence 15 A constellation of alumni, students and researchers ensures From AI to regenerative medicine to urban studies, U of T plays a crucial role in our world. U of T leads the way. A Global City 4 A Comprehensive Global Education 19 Toronto is a dynamic global city—a vibrant and diverse hub U of T prepares all its students for a rapidly changing world of business, culture and innovation. and is set apart by its excellence, diversity and accessibility. A Global University 6 Outstanding Alumni 21 U of T is consistently ranked among the best universities Trail-blazing graduates apply their U of T education worldwide and is a global leader in transforming innovative to inspire students and shine on the world stage. ideas into products, services, companies and jobs. A Life-Saving Discovery is Born 8 Alumni Impact 25 U of T’s extensive alumni network is a significant driver 2021 marks the 100 year anniversary of insulin—one of the of economic growth and societal well-being. most significant advances in medical history. Incredible Breakthroughs 10 Looking to the Future 27 U of T researchers have made an astounding number of U of T is uniquely positioned to contribute to the world. -
Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21St Century
An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J. Robison Margaret Weigel Building the new field of digital media and learning The MacArthur Foundation launched its five-year, $50 million digital media and learning initiative in 2006 to help determine how digital technologies are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life.Answers are critical to developing educational and other social institutions that can meet the needs of this and future generations. The initiative is both marshaling what it is already known about the field and seeding innovation for continued growth. For more information, visit www.digitallearning.macfound.org.To engage in conversations about these projects and the field of digital learning, visit the Spotlight blog at spotlight.macfound.org. About the MacArthur Foundation The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is a private, independent grantmaking institution dedicated to helping groups and individuals foster lasting improvement in the human condition.With assets of $5.5 billion, the Foundation makes grants totaling approximately $200 million annually. For more information or to sign up for MacArthur’s monthly electronic newsletter, visit www.macfound.org. The MacArthur Foundation 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 1200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.(312) 726-8000 www.digitallearning.macfound.org An occasional paper on digital media and learning Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century Henry Jenkins, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology with Katie Clinton Ravi Purushotma Alice J. -
Indian Entertainment and Media Outlook 2010 2 Indian Entertainment and Media Outlook 2010 Message
Indian entertainment and media outlook 2010 2 Indian entertainment and media outlook 2010 Message To our clients and friends both in and beyond the entertainment and media industry : Welcome to the 2010 edition of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Indian Entertainment and Media (E&M) Outlook, covering the forecast period of 2010–2014. Our forecasts and analysis for this edition focus on eight major E&M industry segments and one emerging segment. Each segment details out the key trends observed and challenges faced apart from providing the prospects for the segment. In the industry overview section, we have highlighted the key theme observed during 2009 and what we perceive as future trends in the coming years. We have a chapter on the tax and regulatory impact on the various E&M segments and for the very first time we have included a chapter on how technology can be leveraged in the E&M industry. In 2009, the economy severely impacted the world, translating into steep declines in advertisement as well as consumer spending. India though impacted, did manage to show growth with increased consumer spending as well as innovative action on the part of the industry. Against this backdrop, across the world, except certain markets, speed of digital spending increased due to changing consumer behavior as well as technology available to deliver the same. In India, while the spend on digital media is likely to grow, it is unlikely that it will dominate in the forecast period. This is largely due to the relative unavailability as well as unaffordability of the broadband and mobile infrastructure. -
The Pulitzer Prizes for International Reporting in the Third Phase of Their Development, 1963-1977
INTRODUCTION THE PULITZER PRIZES FOR INTERNATIONAL REPORTING IN THE THIRD PHASE OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT, 1963-1977 Heinz-Dietrich Fischer The rivalry between the U.S.A. and the U.S.S.R. having shifted, in part, to predomi- nance in the fields of space-travel and satellites in the upcoming space age, thus opening a new dimension in the Cold War,1 there were still existing other controversial issues in policy and journalism. "While the colorful space competition held the forefront of public atten- tion," Hohenberg remarks, "the trained diplomatic correspondents of the major newspa- pers and wire services in the West carried on almost alone the difficult and unpopular East- West negotiations to achieve atomic control and regulation and reduction of armaments. The public seemed to want to ignore the hard fact that rockets capable of boosting people into orbit for prolonged periods could also deliver atomic warheads to any part of the earth. It continued, therefore, to be the task of the responsible press to assign competent and highly trained correspondents to this forbidding subject. They did not have the glamor of TV or the excitement of a space shot to focus public attention on their work. Theirs was the responsibility of obliging editors to publish material that was complicated and not at all easy for an indifferent public to grasp. It had to be done by abandoning the familiar cliches of journalism in favor of the care and the art of the superior historian .. On such an assignment, no correspondent was a 'foreign' correspondent. The term was outdated. -
CRESSI Working Papers
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Oxford University, Saïd Business School: Eureka CRESSI Working papers The CRESSI project explores the economic underpinnings of social innovation with a particular focus on how policy and practice can enhance the lives of the most marginalized and disempowered citizens in society. CRESSI Working Papers No. 28/2016 Forms of power, European empires and globalizations. Michael Mann’s The Sources of Social Power and beyond. By Risto Heiskala Chapter 8 of Deliverable D1.1: Report on Institutions, Social Innovation & System Dynamics from the Perspective of the Marginalised. Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation” (CRESSI) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613261. CRESSI Working Paper no. 28/2016 – D1.1 Forms of power, European empires and globalizations. Michael Mann’s The Sources of Social Power and beyond (September 2016) Page 1 | 22 The CRESSI project explores the economic underpinnings of social innovation with a particular focus on how policy and practice can enhance the lives of the most marginalised and disempowered citizens in society. “Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation” (CRESSI) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613261. CRESSI is a collaboration between eight European institutions led by the University of Oxford and will run from 2014-2018. This paper reflects the authors’ views and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained here within. -
Economic and Social Council
UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/64 29 January 1999 ENGLISH Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty•fifth session Item 11 (c) of the provisional agenda CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE QUESTION OF: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Report of the Special Rapporteur on the protection and promotion of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. Abid Hussain CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction ....................... 1 3 I. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................ 2 3 II. ACTIVITIES .................... 3 • 11 3 III. ISSUES ...................... 12 • 44 5 A. The right to seek and receive information ... 12 • 17 5 B. National security laws ............ 18 • 23 7 C. Criminal libel ................ 24 • 28 9 D. New information technologies ......... 29 • 36 10 E. Women and freedom of expression ........ 37 • 44 12 GE.99•10766 (E) E/CN.4/1999/64 page 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page IV. COUNTRY SITUATIONS ................ 45 • 123 14 Algeria ...................... 47 • 48 14 Argentina ..................... 49 • 51 15 Azerbaijan .................... 52 • 55 15 Chad ....................... 56 • 58 17 China ....................... 59 • 68 17 Democratic Republic of the Congo ......... 69 • 71 19 Egypt ....................... 72 • 74 19 Georgia ...................... 75 • 77 20 Hungary ...................... 78 20 Iran (Islamic Republic of) ............ 79 • 81 20 Japan ....................... 82 • 83 21 Malaysia ..................... 84 22 Mexico ...................... 85 • 87 22 Nigeria ...................... 88 • 89 22 Panama ...................... 90 • 97 23 Republic of Korea ................. 98 • 100 24 Saudi Arabia ................... 101 • 102 25 Sierra Leone ................... 103 • 104 25 Sri Lanka ..................... 105 • 108 26 Sudan ....................... 109 • 110 26 Tunisia ...................... 111 27 Turkey ...................... 112 • 116 27 Uzbekistan .................... 117 • 118 28 Viet Nam ..................... 119 • 120 28 Yugoslavia .................... 121 • 123 28 V. -
The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70 -
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media. -
Capacity-Building and Alternative Realities
Capacity-building and alternative realities: Some observations on the political context of technical assistance in Lao PDR1 ___________________________________________________________________ has been affected - both positively and Overview negatively - by the degree to which these The Laos Extension for Agriculture Project efforts are consistent with what happens (LEAP) is funded by the Swiss Agency for within the political reality. And what Development and Cooperation (SDC) and happens within political reality is, from the has been implemented by the National perspective of the advisers, largely Agriculture and Forestry Extension unknown and unpredictable. This situation Service (NAFES), with technical represents a huge constraint to capacity- assistance from Helvetas, a Swiss NGO. building of the kind normally associated LEAP started in 2001 and is now in its 5th with agricultural extension projects. But if and final phase, which is due to be we reorient our understanding of capacity- completed early in 2014. As the project building, giving more attention to the nears its end, the management team has interests of rural communities and less to embarked on a process of identifying the government bureaucracy, the experience lessons learned over the past 12 years of LEAP suggests that political space for that will inform future decisions by the farmer empowerment does exist in some Ministry of Forestry and Agriculture (MAF), parts of Laos. the donors and implementing partners. These are personal observations by one This process involves a series of studies of the technical advisers to LEAP. They do and meetings that will generate a number not necessarily reflect the views of SDC or of reports, fact-sheets and videos. -
Brave New World Service a Unique Opportunity for the Bbc to Bring the World to the UK
BRAVE NEW WORLD SERVIce A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BBC TO BRING THE WORLD TO THE UK JOHN MCCaRTHY WITH CHARLOTTE JENNER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Value 4 Integration: A Brave New World Service? 8 Conclusion 16 Recommendations 16 INTERVIEWEES Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, Ishbel Matheson, Director of Media, Save the Children and University of Westminster former East Africa Correspondent, BBC World Service John Baron MP, Member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee Rod McKenzie, Editor, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat and Charlie Beckett, Director, POLIS BBC 1Xtra News Tom Burke, Director of Global Youth Work, Y Care International Richard Ottaway MP, Chair, Foreign Affairs Select Committee Alistair Burnett, Editor, BBC World Tonight Rita Payne, Chair, Commonwealth Journalists Mary Dejevsky, Columnist and leader writer, The Independent Association and former Asia Editor, BBC World and former newsroom subeditor, BBC World Service Marcia Poole, Director of Communications, International Jim Egan, Head of Strategy and Distribution, BBC Global News Labour Organisation (ILO) and former Head of the Phil Harding, Journalist and media consultant and former World Service training department Director of English Networks and News, BBC World Service Stewart Purvis, Professor of Journalism and former Lindsey Hilsum, International Editor, Channel 4 News Chief Executive, ITN Isabel Hilton, Editor of China Dialogue, journalist and broadcaster Tony Quinn, Head of Planning, JWT Mary Hockaday, Head of BBC Newsroom Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, BOND Peter -
British Anti-Communist Propaganda and Cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951. Andrew Defty
British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951. Andrew Defty European Studies Research Institute School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary History University of Salford Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, January 2002 British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951 Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................. .......ii Abbreviations.................................................................................................................iii Abstract..........................................................................................................................iv Introduction....................................................................................................................! Chapter 1 The Origins of Britain's anti-communist propaganda policy 1945-1947.............................28 Chapter 2 Launching the new propaganda policy, 1948.....................................................................74 Chapter 3 Building a concerted counter-offensive: cooperation with other powers, 1948-1950 ........123 Chapter 4 'Close and continuous liaison': British and American cooperation, 1950-1951 .................162 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................216 Notes Introduction .........................................................................................................226 -
Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey
International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4093–4117 1932–8036/20170005 Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey ERGİN BULUT Koç University, Turkey ERDEM YÖRÜK Koç University, Turkey University of Oxford, UK This article analyzes political trolling in Turkey through the lens of mediated populism. Twitter trolling in Turkey has diverged from its original uses (i.e., poking fun, flaming, etc.) toward government-led polarization and right-wing populism. Failing to develop an effective strategy to mobilize online masses, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (JDP/AKP) relied on the polarizing performances of a large progovernment troll army. Trolls deploy three features of JDP’s populism: serving the people, fetish of the will of the people, and demonization. Whereas trolls traditionally target and mock institutions, Turkey’s political trolls act on behalf of the establishment. They produce a digital culture of lynching and censorship. Trolls’ language also impacts pro-JDP journalists who act like trolls and attack journalists, academics, and artists critical of the government. Keywords: trolls, mediated populism, Turkey, political polarization, Twitter Turkish media has undergone a transformation during the uninterrupted tenure of the ruling Justice and Development Party (JDP) since 2002. Not supported by the mainstream media when it first came to power, JDP created its own media army and transformed the mainstream media’s ideological composition. What has, however, destabilized the entire media environment was the Gezi Park protests of summer 2013.1 Activists’ use of social media not only facilitated political organizing, but also turned the news environment upside down. Having recognized that the mainstream media was not trustworthy, oppositional groups migrated to social media for organizing and producing content.