DOCSLIB.ORG

(REDACTED) Page 1 Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(REDACTED) Page 1 Of Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) Classification: OFFICIAL PART A – YOUR DETAILS Are you: An Individual An Organisation Other (please specify) Whitbread PLC Personal Details* Agent’s Details (if applicable) **Title Mr **First Name Euan **Last Name Brown Job Title Consultant (if on behalf of an organisation) Organisation Whitbread Group PLC Walsingham Planning (if applicable) **Address Telephone Number **Email Address *if an agent is appointed, you may wish to complete only the title and name boxes and, if applicable, the organisation box but please complete the full contact details for the agent. **Name and either email or address required if you wish to be added to the consultation database (see below). Consultation Database (Mailing List) The Councils have a Consultation Database (mailing list) used to keep individuals and organisations informed about Planning Policy Documents across both Council areas. Documents include: the Local Plan, Supplementary Planning Documents and Neighbourhood Plans, (please note some plans may not be applicable to your area). Chiltern District Council and South Bucks District Council are the Data Controllers for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998. Individuals and organisations on the Planning Policy Consultation Database will only be contacted by the Councils in relation to the preparation and production of planning policy documents. The Councils will not publish the names of those individuals on the database but may publish names of statutory bodies and organisations at certain stages of the Local Plan process. Please indicate if you want to be added to the joint consultation database (tick box below). Please note: you do not need to tick this box if you received a letter or email notification from the Councils prior to the start of the consultation, as you are already registered. Classification: OFFICIAL Page 1 of 353 2 Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) Classification: OFFICIAL PART B – RESPONSE Green Belt Options – Please Provide your Comments The Councils have concluded that land within the Green Belt will need to be released in order to contribute to meeting development needs to 2036. This is despite maximising opportunities on ‘brownfield land’ or sites within the built areas and on previously developed land in the Green Belt. The Councils have identified 15 preferred options for development in the Green Belt after taking account of views expressed in a consultation earlier this year and testing a full range of options. All of these preferred options if suitable for development will be needed to contribute to our development needs. They are ‘preferred’ options at this stage as work is on-going to test their suitability. Further testing following this consultation will establish what infrastructure (e.g. highway improvements, schools, medical facilities etc.) will be needed to support the options moving forward taking into account current pressures and circumstances. We are consulting on these 15 preferred options to: a) Seek views to help determine their suitability for development; b) Help understand views on what type of development should be sought if suitable and what type of requirements (other than infrastructure) should be secured as part of development; c) Enable comments on the draft technical work supporting the selection of the preferred options; and d) Provide the opportunity for alternative options to be put forward. Evidence and background documents are available here: www.chiltern.gov.uk/planning/localplan2014- 2036/evidence and www.southbucks.gov.uk/planning/localplan2014-2036/evidence. When commenting please clearly indicate which preferred option(s) you are commenting on. Please do not provide any personal information you do not want to be made publically available as these comments may be published at a later date. Please see consultation response submitted as an email attachment Classification: OFFICIAL Page 2 of 353 3 Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) www.simpsoneng.com SITE APPRAISAL FOR PROPOSED ALLOCATION FOR DEVELOPMENT LAND NORTH OF DENHAM ROUNDABOUT DENHAM PREPARED FOR: JOB NO: 14457 DATE: 9 December 2016 Revision: A Page 3 of 353 Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) DOCUMENT HISTORY Revision Description Date - First issue. 06.12.16 A Development description revised. 09.12.16 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 5 2. FLOOD RISK ................................................................................................................. 6 3. GROUND CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 7 4. FOUL WATER DRAINAGE ............................................................................................ 8 5. SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ..................................................................................... 9 6. UTILITIES .................................................................................................................... 11 7. CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 14 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SFRA FLOOD MAPS APPENDIX B: PHASE 1 DESK STUDY APPENDIX C: BGS INFILTRATION SUDS REPORT JOB NO: 14457 ISSUE NO: A ISSUE DATE: 09.12.2016 Page 2 of 18 AUTHOR: G. Crowther OFFICE: HENLEY CHECKED BY: G. Crowther Page 4 of 353 Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This report has been prepared by Simpson Associates on behalf of Whitbread Group PLC in connection with a proposed allocation for development on land north of Denham Roundabout, which is a key site identified in the Chiltern and South Bucks document “Green Belt Preferred Options Consultation: October – December 2016”. This report provides a desk based review of the following key matters: - Flood Risk - Ground Conditions - Foul Water Drainage - Surface Water Drainage - Utilities Flood Risk The site has been identified to be in Flood Zone 1, which is an area not considered to be at risk of tidal or fluvial flooding and deemed suitable for all forms of development in terms of flood risk by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA)” available on South Buckinghamshire District Council’s website identifies the south-eastern corner of the site to be a critical drainage area where surface water could accumulate following a rainfall event. The area is the sites natural low point and flooding would be linked to the accumulation of overland runoff from the wider site. It is recommended that this area is considered for use as a strategic Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) facility such as a balancing pond or wetland that could be designed to minimise the rate of discharge, volume and environmental impact of surface water runoff. Ground Conditions A Phase 1 Desk Study has reviewed the sites setting / history / environmental setting and assessed the implications of any potential environmental risks / liabilities / constraints to future development on the site. The Desk Study showed there to be no significant risks associated with land quality or contamination that would prevent development from taking place and concluded that the site is suitable for the type of development assumed. Foul Water Drainage It has been established that a 375mm foul sewer crosses the eastern edge of site. Any development proposed on the site should take into consideration the presence of the 375mm sewer ensuring proposed buildings are set back at least 3.0m from the centreline of the sewer. Alternatively the sewer could be diverted to suit the site layout under a Section 185 Agreement with Thames Water. Development could be provided with a foul water drainage connection to the existing sewer inside the site without causing any detrimental impact to the existing sewer system as any necessary improvements could be requisitioned under Section 98 of the Water Industry Act 1991. JOB NO: 14457 ISSUE NO: A ISSUE DATE: 09.12.2016 Page 3 of 18 AUTHOR: G. Crowther OFFICE: HENLEY CHECKED BY: G. Crowther Page 5 of 353 Classification: OFFICIAL PORep2735 (REDACTED) Surface Water Drainage It has been established that development could be provided with a surface water drainage connection to the land drainage ditches located along the sites western, southern and eastern boundaries. The ditches would require clearance as part of any development taking place as they have been identified to be heavily overgrown and partially blocked. It would be necessary to to minimise the rate of discharge / volume / environmental impact of surface water runoff from development using Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS). Permeable paving and swales are considered to be the most appropriate SUDS for individual development parcels on the site. These SUDS could be used to attenuate and convey runoff to a balancing pond / wetland strategically located in the south-east corner of the site. Utilities It has been established that the site is surrounded by existing electricity / gas / water / telecommunication service infrastructure. Given the presence of this nearby infrastructure it is not anticipated that there would be any substantial difficulty with providing the site with service connections. Conclusions No substantial issues have been identified
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-Route Effects
    HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects High Speed Two (HS2) Limited One Canada Square July 2015 London E14 5AB T 020 7944 4908 X56 E [email protected] SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 SES AND AP2 ES – VOLUME 4 www.gov.uk/hs2 HIGH SPEED RAIL (London - West MidLands) Supplementary Environmental Statement and Additional Provision 2 Environmental Statement Volume 4 | Off-route effects July 2015 SES and AP2 ES 3.4.1 High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, One Canada Square, London E14 5AB Details of how to obtain further copies are available from HS2 Ltd. Telephone: 020 7944 4908 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/hs2 Copyright © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2015, except where otherwise stated. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full via the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Printed in Great Britain on paper containing at least 75% recycled fibre.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Unitarians’
    Kensington Unitarians Newsletter: July 2009 What’s on A Message from our Minister… this month: The ‘Rumba Rapids’ of Life th Saturday 4 July, 10.00am Walking Group: Lee Valley Meeting at Liverpool Street It might not be an ideal congregational day out, but I recently spent a fun packed day at th Sunday 5 July, 11.00am Thorpe Park, along with sixty 15 year olds “Life in the Slow Lane” Led by Jo Ridgers and their teachers. They like to tease me about being a minister and the joke of the th Tuesday 7 July, 7-9pm day involved seeking potential sermon Creativity Group: material in various theme park rides. My ‘Field for Essex Church’ led by Sarah Tinker favourite ride was the Rumba Rapids. This th involved standing in a queue whilst listening Thursday 9 July, 2-5pm to jazzy Latin American music, at last taking ‘Freestyle Felt’ your seat with other people in a large th Sunday 12 July, 11am rubber tyre and setting off round the rapids. “A Flower Communion” The water flowed speedily, the tyre swung round, there were sudden drops and dark places, Led by Rev. Sarah Tinker and ever so often water would cascade over you from above or from the side, its arrival th Sunday 12 July, 2-3pm impossible to predict. The pupils mocked us teachers for our squeals of excitement. For Nia Dance them this was one of the tamer rides; its similarity to white water rafting illusory. Led by Sonya Leite Sunday 12th July, 3.30-5pm In fact, so slow were the ‘rapids’ at times that potential sermons could still be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Note: Development That Should Have Been Assessed As Part of the Cumulative Assessment
    th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Joint Note: Development that should have been assessed as part of the cumulative assessment Statement on behalf of: LB Hillingdon, Slough BC, South Bucks DC and Bucks CC. 1. Project 1: Western Rail Link to Heathrow th Joint Statement 26 November 2016 Highways England Comment 1.1 The Western Rail Link to Heathrow proposal it not yet either a committed project nor is it the subject of a live application. Its details and effects are not yet known. 1.2 The proposal was announced on 5 February 2014 following consideration of four options by Network Rail. At the time the assessment for the M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway scheme (the "Scheme") was undertaken, the proposal was at “early stages of development” following its inclusion in the Route Utilisation Strategies published in March 2010. As such, it was not at a sufficiently developed stage to be included in the cumulative assessment for the Scheme and did not come within the guidelines set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (“DMRB”) for those committed, reasonably foreseeable developments that should be included in an assessment. It is understood that an application may be brought forward in due course. Any application for the construction of the Western Rail Link will be required to take the M4 Scheme into account when assessing the effect of its proposals, rather than the reverse. 1.3 Network Rail submitted a Scoping Report (Environmental Impact Assessment – Scoping Report, Western Rail Link to Heathrow, Jacobs, April 2015) to the Planning Inspectorate in April 2015 that set the principles of the proposed approach to the construction of the relocated depot.
    [Show full text]
  • VALP Modelling
    VALP Modelling BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report TN02 | 2 30/05/19 BCC NE B ucks Loc al Plan T ests -Tec hnical Report BCC NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report VALP Modelling Project No: BRJ10150 Document Title: NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Document No.: TN02 Revision: 2 Date: 30/05/19 Client Name: BCC Client No: BCC Project Manager: Mily Parveen Author: Catherine Hill File Name: M:\Transport Modelling\BRJ10150 VALP Model Runs\Technical Work\Reports\Countywide modelling report\Countywide Modelling Report- VALP 290519.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited NONE www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 28/02/19 Draft CH TW MP 1 09/04/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP 2 30/05/19 Revision after client comment CH/TP MP MP TN02 1 NE Bucks Local Plan Tests -Technical Report Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Scope of study ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Volume 2 (Appendices) (Part 3)
    PINEWOOD STUDIOS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND FIVE POINTS ROUNDABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT VOLUME 2 (APPENDICES) (PART 3) DOCUMENT NUMBER February 2013 Eiii ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT APPENDIX 13.1 Economic context A1.1 Introduction 1. This socio-economic baseline has been established through the analysis of the change over time of a range of applicable socio-economic indicators. The change over time within each area of impact has been compared. 2. Ward-level, Beaconsfield Constituency, Local Authority and LEP data are not available for every indicator group. A1.2 Economic output and productivity 3. In 2009 Buckinghamshire generated some £10,945 million of GVA, representing 6.1% of the GVA generated across the South East of England. Between 2005 and 2009, GVA in Buckinghamshire increased by 7.1%, although this was below the UK national rate of 12.5% over the same period. Figure 1 shows the change in GVA per head. Figure 1: Change in GVA per head (1999-2009) (current basic prices) 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 GVA perGVA head (£) 17,000 15,000 13,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 UK Buckinghamshire Source: ONS headline GVA per head by NUTS3 area A1.3 Population 4. Figure 2 shows the indexed change in total population over the 2001-2010 period. During this period, the total population of the PSA increased by 8.0%, compared with increases of 9.0% for South Bucks, 4.0% for the LEP area and 5.3% for the UK as a whole. A comparable trend of total population increase is observed over the 2007-2010 period, during which the total population of the PSA increased by 3.8%, compared with increases of 3.7% for South Bucks, 1.9% for the LEP area and 2.1% for the UK as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground News Index 1994
    UNDERGROUND NEWS ISSN 0306-8617 INDEX 1994 Issues 385-396 PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE LONDON UNDERGROUND RAILWAY SOCIETY 527 INDEX TO 1994 ISSUES OF UNDERGROUND NEWS Notes (i) Page entries witli * are photographs. (ii) Page entries for an individual station may include developments in the vicinity of the station. A ACCIDENTS - COLLISIONS Harrow & Weatdstone, 29.3.94, buffer stops & traction std., 213,304,377 Watford area, Bakerloo, 16.10.62, 181 ACCIDENTS - DERAILMENTS Aldersgate, 24.1.55, 179 British Museum, 15.10.94 , 481 Chancery Lane, battery loco., 20.4.94, 251,306 Edgware, 15.3.94, 230 Epping, 26.10.94, 11,18 Kennington, June 1994, 377 Loughton, 1.11.93. 11,18.38 Momington Crescent, 12.3.93, 20 NearHolbom, 16.10.94, 513 Northumberland Park depot, 26.1.94, 120,125 Piccadilly Circus. Bakerloo. 1943, 389 Piccadilly Circus, Bakerloo, 29.10.75, 389 Piccadilly Circus, Bakerioo, 22.4.94, 240,252,274,311,377,389 White City area, engineers' train, 25.3.94, 265 ACCIDENTS - FIRES Central Line, conductor rail, due to 1992 stock. 229 Debden (near), grass, August 1994, 458 Dollis Hill signal cables, 4.7.94, 379 King's Cross, compensation insufficient, 230 Train, High Street Kensington, July 1994 , 379 Wanstead, in container, 4.5.94, 308 ACCIDENTS - FORMATION FAILURES (See also under 'Bridges') Colindale/Burnt Oak, 1.1.94, 118,119,370 Queensbury area, 29.5.94, 284,397 Ravenscourt Park, wall, 27.4.93, 328 Sloane Square, roof beam crack. 311,375,376,377,429,465 ACCIDENTS - MISCELLANEOUS Jubilee Line train hits umbrella, 1.8.94.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils
    Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 Sustainability Appraisal for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Regulation 18 – Green Belt Preferred Options LC-330 Document Control Box Client Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Sustainability Appraisal of the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan Report Title (Regulation 18) Green Belt Preferred Options Status Final Filename LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS Date September 2017 Author DS Reviewed JE Approved ND Cover Photo: Looking East across option ‘National Epilepsy Centre, Chalfont St Peter’ © Lepus Consulting for Chiltern and South Bucks District Councils Chiltern and South Bucks SA Green Belt Preferred Options September 2017 LC-330_SBucks_&_Chilterns_GB_SA_18_290917DS.docx Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 About the Chiltern and South Bucks Local Plan 2014-2036 ............................................... 4 1.4 The Regulation 18 Consultation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Session
    PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Monday 25 January 2016 (Evening) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Sir Henry Bellingham Sir Peter Bottomley Geoffrey Clifton-Brown Mr David Crausby Mr Mark Hendrick _____________ IN ATTENDANCE Mr James Strachan QC, Counsel, Department for Transport Mr Edward Briggs Mr Alan Masters WITN ESSES Mr Bob Birch Mr Andrew Pibworth Mr Simon Clarke Mr Michael Gallagher Mr Humphrey Tizard Mr Br ia n Cab le Mr Robin Allen Mr Tim Smart, International Director for High Speed Rail, CH2M Hill _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page The Association of the Residents of the Drive (Harefield Place) et al Submissions by Mr Masters 3 Evidence of Mr Birch 8 Mr Smart, examined by Mr Strachan 13 Mr Smart, cross-examined by Mr Masters 19 Further evidence from Mr Birch 27 Further submissions by Mr Masters 28 Evidence of Mr Pibworth 29 Evidence of Mr Clarke 34 Evidence of Mr Gallagher 35 Further submissions by Mr Masters 37 Response from Mr Strachan 38 Closing submissions by Mr Masters 41 Ickenham Residents’ As soc ia tio n Submissions by Mr Tizard 42 Response from Mr Strachan 51 Closing submissions by Mr Tizard 54 Mr Br ia n Cab le Submissions by Mr Cable 55 Response from Mr Strachan 59 The London Wildlife Trust Submissions by Mr Frith 64 Response from Mr Strachan 68 Denham Water Ski Club Submissions by Mr Briggs and Mr Allen 71 Response from Mr Strachan 77 2 (At 18.40) The Association of the Residents of the Drive (Harefield Place) et al 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Denham Parish Neighbourhood Plan Pre-Submission
    DENHAM PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2020 – 2036 SUBMISSION PLAN Denham Golf Club Station Published by Denham Parish Council for Pre-Submission consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended). OCTOBER 2020 A Guide to Reading this Plan Of necessity, this Neighbourhood Plan is a detailed technical document. The purpose of this page is to explain the structure and help you find your way around the plan. 1. Introduction & Background This section explains the background to this Neighbourhood Plan and how you can take part in and respond to the consultation. 2. The Neighbourhood Area This section details many of the features of the designated area. 3. Planning Policy Context This rather technical section relates this Plan to the National Planning Policy Framework and the planning policies of Buckinghamshire Council. 4. Community Views on Planning Issues This section explains the community involvement that has taken place. 5. Vision, Objectives & Land Use Policies This is the key section. Firstly, it provides a statement on the Neighbourhood Plan Vision and Objectives. It then details Policies which are proposed to address the issues outlined in the Foreword and in Section 4. These Policies are listed opposite. There are Policy Maps at the back of the plan and additional information in the Appendices to which the policies cross reference. 6. Implementation This section explains how the Plan will be implemented and future development guided and managed. It suggests projects which might be supported by the Community Infrastructure Levy which the Parish Council will have some influence over. Finally, it deals with a number of issues which although relevant are outside the scope of a Neighbourhood Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire Council
    Buckinghamshire Council www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk Report to South Buckinghamshire Area Planning Committee Application Number: PL/19/4159/FA Proposal: Erection of crematorium, dining hall and widening of access road with associated landscape and biodiversity enhancements. Site Location: The Lea, Western Avenue, Denham, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4NA Applicant: Anoopam Mission Case Officer: Laura Peplow Ward affected: Denham Parish Town Council: Denham Parish Council Valid date: 2 December 2019 Determination date: 6 March 2020 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Committee delegate the application to the Director of Planning and Environment to: GRANT planning permission subject to the conditions set out in this report and any others which he considers appropriate and to: a) The satisfactory completion of a Section 106 Agreement to secure the requirements as set out in this report. b) There being no new substantive, material planning matters being raised following statutory publicity for the development proposed being a potential ‘Departure from the Development Plan’ c) Resolving that the application be forwarded to the Secretary of State in accordance with the provision of the Town and Country Planning (Consultation) (England) Direction 2009. Or REFUSE planning permission if a satisfactory S106 Agreement cannot be completed, for such reasons relating to the Countryside Management Service and Public Rights of Way as the Director of Planning and Environment considers appropriate. 1.0 Summary & Recommendation/ Reason for Planning Committee Consideration 1.1 The application proposes the construction of a crematorium and dining hall within the grounds of the existing Anoopam Mission Temple site. 1.2 The site is within the Green Belt and construction of the proposed development would constitute inappropriate development and would also result in a loss of openness and encroachment into the Green Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeches Local Area Forum
    Buckinghamshire County Council Visit www.buckscc.gov.uk/democracy for councillor information and email alerts for local meetings Beeches Local Area Forum Title: Update report from Transport for Buckinghamshire Date: 6 March 2013 Author: Sean Rooney Contact officer: Si Khan Transport Localities Team Leader (South) 01494 475320 Electoral divisions affected: Burnham Beeches Taplow, Dorney and Lent Rise Stoke Poges & Farnham Common Summary 1. From 2010 this standard report will be issued to each Local Area Forum (LAF) / Local Community Partnership (LCP) from Transport for Buckinghamshire. 2. It will aim to provide a comprehensive update on current and relevant Transportation issues which are tailored to each individual LAF / LCP. 3. Standard topics to be covered will be: - Dates of when Local Community Gangs will visit parishes - Major issues likely to affect parishes within the LAF / LCP - Update on ongoing local issues - Policy Development - Any other information 4. In addition, it will cover any emerging issues which could or will affect Local Area Forum / Local Community Partnership areas. Area Maintenance Routine Maintenance At present, the peaks and troughs in the numbers of potholes, have been absorbed by the works teams, whilst keeping other patching, white lining, gully emptying crews etc, on normal duties. The workforce is to be supplemented on 27th February by the introduction of a Velocity Patcher. This self contained unit, is specifically for potholing, minor patching and sealing of road surfaces and will initially be used on the rural roads. If you have any queries, please contact you local area technician in the first instance. Any urgent works should be reported via the Contact Centre on: 0845 230 2882 or through our website at: http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/transport/ea_report_problem.page A full list of when work will be taking place is available on: http://www.transportforbucks.net/Roadworks-Centre.aspx Winter Maintenance The recent cold snap passed without significant disruption to the network.
    [Show full text]