DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Assessment Report Romania 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Assessment Report Romania 2001 Biodiversity Assessment Report Romania 2001 Sumbitted to: USAID/Romania Submitted by: John Hansen, USAID/EGAT/ENV/DAA Dr. Dan Manoleli, Ecological Group for Co-operation - Romania Dr. Nicolea Galdean, Ecological Group for Co-operation - Romania Prepared: September 2001 Approved: January 2002 COL L E O U G P IC U D R E G C O E LABORAR Table of contents Page Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Romanian Biodiversity Status 2 1.1. Overview 2 1.2. Habitat diversity 3 1.2.1. Woodland and forests 4 1.2.2. Wetlands 4 1.2.3. Grasslands, Shrubs 5 1.2.4. Bogs 5 1.2.5. Caves and cave ecosystems 5 1.2.6. Soils and agriculture 5 1.3. Species diversity 6 1.3.1. Flora 7 1.3.2. Fauna 7 1.3.2.1. Migratory birds 7 1.3.2.2. Conservation of Large carnivores 8 1.3.2.3. Other fauna with Conservation 9 status 1.3.2.4. Sport fishing 10 1.4. Hydrographic network 10 Chapter 2. Threats to Romanian Biodiversity 12 2.1. Environmental degradation 12 2.2. Engineering of Waterways 13 2.2.1. Channelization 13 2.2.2. Damming 13 2.3. Wetlands 14 2.4. Forests 15 2.5. Poaching 15 2.6. Mining 15 Chapter 3. Romanian Biodiversity Conservation Efforts 17 3.1. Protected areas 17 3.2. Legal and Institutional Framework 19 3.2.1. Identification of relevant laws 19 3.2.2. The Romanian Constitution and Environmental Protection 19 3.2.3. Romania’s Current Protected Area Administrative and Management Structure 19 3.2.4. International Agreements 22 3.2.5. International and Regional Conventions 22 3.2.6. Romania and the European Union Accession Process 22 3.2.7. The Europe Agreement 22 3.2.8. EU Assistance Programs 23 3.2.9. EU Environmental Legislation 23 3.2.10. Romanian Legislative Approximation to EU Environmental Instruments 23 3.2.11. Domestic Law on protected areas and biodiversity conservation 24 Primary Legislation 24 National Legislation-Environmental Protection 24 National Legislation-Land Use, Ownership and Management 24 National Legislation-Forest Code 25 National Legislation-Hunting Law 25 3.3. Status of current situation 25 3.4. International Donor Biodiversity Conservation Efforts in Romania 26 Chapter 4. Summary of Biodiversity Conservation Issues, Existing Problems, and Recommendations 27 4.1. Legal framework 27 4.2. Land Restitution 28 4.3. Bioconservation Education 30 4.4. Conclusions 30 Attachements: Annexes, Maps, Figures, and Plates LIST OF MAPS MAP 1 Romania-physical map MAP 2 Land utilization MAP 3 Potential vegetation of Romania MAP 4 The Romanian bogs distribution MAP 5 Romanian Fauna and Flora Diversity (species richness) MAP 6 Hydrographic map LIST OF FIGURES FIG. 1A Some aspects of the present state of land stock FIG. 1B Quality of river water FIG. 2A Regional dsitribution of woods (% of surface area) FIG. 2B The environmental quality of the woodlands FIG. 3 Institutional Framework for Management of Existing Protected Areas LIST OF PHOTOS PLATE 1 Gemenele Lake-Retezat Mountains Gemenele Research House-Retezat Mountains PLATE 2 Squacco heron (Ardeola raloides) Pygmy Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus) Coot (Fulica atra) PLATE 3 Black-necked grebe (Podiceps nigricollis) Black-necked grebe nest Black-headed gull nests (Larus ridibundus) PLATE 4 Black-headed gull colony (Larus ridibundus) Black-tailed goodwit (Limosa limosa) Great White Egret (Casmerodius albus) and Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) feeding ground PLATE 5 Common Toad (Bufo bufo) Tortoise (Testudo graeca ibera) Tortoise (Testudo graeca ibera) PLATE 6 Ruddy shelduck (Tadorna ferruginea) Mute swan (Cygnus olor) Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) PLATE 7 Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) White storck (Ciconia ciconia) Mallard (Anas platyrrhynchos) PLATE 8 Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) Wolf (Canis lupus)-Piatra Craiului Mountains Wolf collars for telemetry PLATE 9 Landscape Hateg Depression Grassland-Hateg Depression Fossil Coral Reef-Casimcea, Gura Dobrogei PLATE 10 Wooded meadows -Bucegi Mountains Piatra Craiului National Park Piatra Craiului Mountains in spring LIST OF ANNEXES 1. ANNEX I A USAID Environment and Natural Resources Code ANNEX I B USAID endangered species (biodiversity) Code 2. ANNEX II Institutions and personalities interviewed in preparation of the Romanian Biodiversity Assessment Report 3. ANNEX III Main groups of ecosystemic formations of Romania, number of ecosystem types, their present status and territorial distribution 4. ANNEX IV Natural habitat types whose conservation requires the designation of special areas of conservation 5. ANNEX V Romanian meadows distribution 6. ANNEX VI The list of endemic and subendemic plant and animal species of Romania. A. Endemic plant species; B. Subendemic plant species; C. Endemic and subendemic animal species 7. ANNEX VII Protected areas in Romania. A. Statistics; B. List of protected areas; C. The main protected virgin forests 8. ANNEX VIII Plant and animal species with a special conservation status in Romania A. Plant species; B. Animal species; C. Species of Black Sea importance 9. ANNEX IX The treaties, the conventions and the international agreements 10. ANNEX X EU legislation for nature conservation 11. ANNEX XI Romanian Environmental Protection Law 12. ANNEX XII Other domestic regulations with significance to biodiversity conservation 13. ANNEX XIII International donor biodiversity conservation efforts in Romania 14. ANNEX XIV References INTRODUCTION This Biodiversity Assessment Report (BAR) for Romania was prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)/Romania mission. It addresses statutory concerns for biodiversity promulgated at Section 119 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (“FAA”) [22 U.S.C. Section 2151(q)], and guidelines for environmental protection and natural resources conservation promulgated at FAA Section 117 [22 U.S.C. Section 2151(p)]. The statutory requirements of FAA Section 117 have been promulgated into USAID regulations at Title 22 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 216 (22 CFR 216), and have been incorporated into the USAID Automated Directives System at section 204 (ADS 204). The relevant sections of the U.S. Code have been included at Annexes I A and I B. USAID Romania prepared this report in preparation for its FY 2002- FY 2006 Country Strategic Plan. To prepare the BAR, the project team extensively researched and compiled natural resources data. Interviews with scientific and educational institutions, governmental bodies, bilateral and multilateral donors, and the national and international NGO community were conducted. Field trips to Retezat and Piatra Crailui National Parks and the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve were conducted to gain first hand experiences of some natural resources conservation areas and to meet individuals and organizations directly involved in bioconservation efforts in Romania. The BAR is not intended to be a comprehensive scientific summary of Romanian flora and fauna, rather it is designed to summarize major trends in biodiversity loss and conservation efforts in Romania. The BAR is divided into four chapters: Chapter 1 identifies Romanian biodiversity, identifying areas rich in species diversity as well as areas unique to Romania. This chapter describes major ecosystems, species endemism, and key habitats, and identifies key landscape features and areas for the conservation of biodiversity; Chapter 2 summarizes current and future threats to Romania’s biodiversity, providing information on endangered and threatened species, and summarizing policies, land use practices, pest/contamination sources, and transboundary obstacles to biodiversity; Chapter 3 describes ongoing governmental, bilateral donor, multilateral donor, NGO, and other efforts being undertaken in Romania to conserve biodiversity. These efforts include national conservation legislation, policies and strategies, international conventions, protected area management capacities. Chapter 4 includes a summary of efforts needed to conserve Romanian biodiversity, summarizes donor impact on biodiversity; and identifies potential opportunities to support biodiversity conservation. This BAR was prepared entirely in country from August 6 to September 7, 2001. The Romanian NGO contractor retained by USAID, Ecological Group for Co-operation (GEC), provided two Romanian biodiversity specialists from its staff: Professor Dan Manoleli, Ph.D. of the University of Bucharest Department of Ecology; and Dr. Nicolae Galdean, of the Ecological University, Bucharest. John Hansen, a USAID Environment Officer, who worked closely with the project team, conducted interviews in Washington, D.C. and Romania, participated in field trips to gain first hand knowledge of Romanian biodiversity, provided technical guidance, and assisted in formatting, editing, and preparing the recommendations of the report. Overall, the team conducted 30 interviews with USAID staff, bilateral and multilateral donors, and local experts in forestry, natural resource and wildlife management, Danube delta conservation, governmental policy and regulation, bioconservation and other related matters. Individuals from different Institutions who were interviewed are presented in Annex II. Numerous documents, including the Romanian Biodiversity Conservation National Strategy, the National Environmental Action Plan, World Bank Forestry Sector Note, reports from World Bank-funded biodiversity projects in the Danube Delta and Carpathian Mountains, and reports from the World Wildlife Fund Carpathian Ecoregion and Carpathian Large Carnivore Project, among others, were valuable sources of information for this report. A comprehensive listing of references
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoogeography of Epigean Freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) in Romania: Fragmented Distributions and Wide Altitudinal Variability
    Zootaxa 3893 (2): 243–260 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3893.2.5 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8336FFDA-F1A5-4026-A5B6-CCEBFF84F40A Zoogeography of epigean freshwater Amphipoda (Crustacea) in Romania: fragmented distributions and wide altitudinal variability DENIS COPILAȘ-CIOCIANU1, MICHAŁ GRABOWSKI2, LUCIAN PÂRVULESCU3 & ADAM PETRUSEK1 1Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Viničná 7, 12844, Prague, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 2University of Łódź, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Invertebrate Zoology & Hydrobiology, Banacha 12/16, 90-237, Łódź, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] 3West University of Timișoara, Faculty of Chemistry, Biology, Geography, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Pestalozzi 16A, 300115, Timișoara, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Inland epigean freshwater amphipods of Romania are diverse and abundant for this region has a favourable geographical position between the Balkans and the Black Sea. Excluding Ponto-Caspian species originating in brackish waters and freshwater subterranean taxa, there are 11 formally recognized epigean freshwater species recorded from this country. They belong to 3 genera, each representing a different family: Gammarus (Gammaridae, 8 species or species complexes), Niphargus (Niphargidae, 2 epigean species) and Synurella (Crangonyctidae, one species). Their large-scale distribution patterns nevertheless remain obscure due to insufficient data, consequently limiting biogeographical interpretations. We provide extensive new data with high resolution distribution maps, thus improving the knowledge of the ranges of these taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    30 PART 1.: AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF BIOLOGICAL AND LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY IN CROATIA Threats to biological communities in the Adriatic Anthropogenic impacts pose a constant threat to living communities in shallow coastline areas. This primarily refers to building works carried out on the coast, to backfilling and consequential mudding of some parts of the sea, to solid waste disposal and particularly to pollution by unpurified waste waters of municipal and industrial origin. These factors pose threat to living communities of supralittoral and mediolittoral zones, and especially meadows of sea flowers Posidonia oceanica and Zostera marina (Box 27) belonging to communities of the infralittoral zone. A highly intensive process of filling up the coastal sea with diverse building and earthworks wastes is adversely affecting the settlements of various algae of genus Cystoseria, including the settlements of the endemic brown alga Adriatic wrack (Fig. 46) that has almost completely disappeared from some polluted parts of the Adriatic (western coast of Istria, Split, etc.). The degradation of ecological balance of benthonic ecosystems is also a result of excessive fishing for economic and sport reasons, including the ravaging of individual divers. In the shallow sea man particularly threatens the complex communities of photophilous algae and meadows of Posidonia oceanica, while in the depths of the sea the communities of the detrital bottom are most threatened due to consequences of natural stress conditions, and the communities of the muddy bottom due to excessive trawling. The immigration (or introduction) of the tropical green algae Caulerpa in the northern Mediterranean in 1984 represents another threat to biological diversity of the Figure 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia
    Available online at http://journals.usamvcluj.ro/index.php/promediu ProEnvironment ProEnvironment 11 (2018) 143-157 Review The Rights of Alive – Protecting the Natural Endangered Heritage in Romania, Croatia, Poland and Slovenia CIOANCĂ Lia-Maria1*, Luminița UJICĂ2, Marijana MIKULANDRA3, Ryszard SOŁTYSIK4, Maja ČERNE5 1Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, University Extension Bistrița, Andrei Mureşanu st., no. 3-5, Romania 2High Scool with Sportive Program Bistrița, Calea Moldovei no. 18. Romania 3OŠ Tina Ujevi Osnovna škola Tina Ujevića Koturaška cesta 75 10000 Zagreb, Croatia 4Zespół Szkół Nr1 w Humniskach, 36 – 206, Huminska 264, Poland 5OŠ Rogaška Slatina, Kidričeva ulica 24, 3250 Rogaška Slatina Slovenia Received 23 July 2018; received and revised form 18 September 2018; accepted 25 September 2018 Available online 30 September 2018 Abstract This article deals with the impact of destructive actions of human population on natural world. As a consequence of relying on non-renewable energy sources and reckless encroachment on natural habitats a lot of plant and animal species have become extinct and more and more species are getting endangered. Thus celebrating biodiversity and solidarity for all life forms, from the tiniest one to the most complex eco-systems, has been in the centre of our attention and operational activities. Keywords: durable development, ecology, endangered species. 1. Introduction Within the massive destruction of forests and forest climate, we witness significant changes, Just as the man has passed from the stage of sometimes radical of the environment. For the animal hunter and collector up to animal raiser and farmer, and plants which have survived through a long period the natural vegetation has increasingly been subject of adaptation, a new difficult era starts again.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands on Danube Delta Bioisphere Reserve
    Wetland conservation and sustainable use in Romania Dr. Grigore Baboianu, Executive director, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Romania 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 “Wetlands: home and destination” Romania Total surface: 238,391 km2 Inhabitants: 19,042,936 (2011) Etnic Groups: Romanian 89%, Hungarian 7.5%, Gipsy 1.9%, German & others 1.6% Position: Central South-Eastern 450 N Latitude 250 E Longitude Climate: Temperate (8 -110 C) Rainfall: 400-600 l/y 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Relief: Mountains (35%) - Carpathian, 910 km - Dobrogea Hills (35%) Plains (30%) Black Sea (245 km) Danube Delta (3,510 km2) 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Wetlands in Romania In Romania there were inventoried: Lakes: 3,450 (2,650 km2 - 1,1%): mountain (glacial, carst, vulcanoes), floodplain, reservoirs, marine and coastal lagoons and lakes of Danube Delta. Rivers: 120,000 km: (Danube River (1,075 km), 28 rivers >162 km (8,096 km)) Swamps: 215 (52 km2) Map of wetlands distribution in Romania 11TH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Main use/role of wetlands: Flood Control Groundwater Replenishment Shoreline Stabilisation & Storm Protection Sediment & Nutrient Retention and Export Climate Change Mitigation Water Purification Reservoirs
    [Show full text]
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1895 Band/Volume: 60-2_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kobelt Wilhelm Artikel/Article: Bericht über die geographische Verbreitung, die Systematik und die Biologie etc. der Mollusken im Jahre 1893. 471- 545 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Bericht über die geographisclie Verbreitung, die Systematik und die Biologie etc. der Mollusken im Jalire 1893. Von Dr. W. Kobelt. Verzeichniss der Publikationen. Abercrombie, AI., vide Melvill. Adams, L. E., a theory as to the possible introduction of Hy- drobia jenkinsi. In Journal Conchol VII p. 148. *Adcock, D. J., a band List of the Aquatic Mollusca inha- biting South Australia. Adelaide, 1893, 8*^ 14 pp, Ancey, C. F., Note sur l'habitat des especes du groupe de l'Helix raymondi, Moq. In le Naturaliste p. 91. — Etudes sur la Faune malacologique des lies de Sandwich. 9. Monographie du genre Carelia. 10. Description d'un Microcystis nouveau (M. lymanniana). — In Memoires Soc. Zool. France VI p. 321. — Remarques sur quelques especes du genre Buliminus, avec les descriptions de plusieiirs especes nouvelles de ce genre. — In Bull. Soc. Zool. France XVÜI p. 35. — Faunes malacologiques de 1' Afghanistan et du Beloutchistan. Ibid. p. 40. — Description d'une nouvelle Heiice du Kabylie. Ibid. p. 136. — Description d'une nouvelle espece de Pupa. Ibid. p. 138. Appelöf, A., Teuthologische Beiträge. III, Bemerkungen über die auf der Norwegischen Nord-Meer Expedition (1876—78) ge- sammelten Cephalopoden. IV. Ueber einen Fall von doppelseitiger Hektokotyhsation bei Eledone cirrhosa (Lam.) d'Orb.
    [Show full text]
  • Turizam I Hotelijerstvo
    UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET DEPARTMAN ZA GEOGRAFIJU, TURIZAM I HOTELIJERSTVO Naučno-stručni časopis iz turizma TURIZAM br. 11 Savremene tendencije u turizmu, hotelijerstvu i gastronomiji 2007. YU ISSN 1450-6661 UNIVERZITET U NOVOM SADU PRIRODNO-MATEMATIČKI FAKULTET DEPARTMAN ZA GEOGRAFIJU, TURIZAM I HOTELIJERSTVO Naučno-stručni časopis iz turizma TURIZAM br.11 Savremene tendencije u turizmu, hotelijerstvu i gastronomiji 2007. Glavni i odgovorni urednik dr Miroslav Vesković, dekan Urednik dr Jovan Plavša Redakcija dr Jovan Romelić dr Lazar Lazić mr Tatjana Pivac mr Vuk Garača Igor Stamenković Vanja Dragičević Uglješa Stankov Departman za geografiju, Lektor i korektor turizam i hotlijerstvo Jasna Tatić Anadol Gegić Izdavač Prirodno-matematički fakultet Departman za geografiju, turizam i hotelijerstvo Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3 21000 Novi Sad tel + 381 (0)21 450 104, 450105 fax + 381 (0)21 459 696 Design & Prepress Lazarus, Kać Štampa Futura, Petrovaradin Tiraž 300 Štampanje časopisa pomogao Pokrajinski sekretarijat za nauku i tehnološki razvoj, Novi Sad. Održivi razvoj I turizam ..................67 Mr Tamara Kovačević SustainaBle Development Značaj Podunavačkih bara potencijalne Sadržaj and Tourism ...........................................67 turističke destinacije u regionalnom razvoju Zapadnog Pomoravlja ................... 131 Mr Vuk Garača Savremeni OBliCI U turizmu ..............5 Siniša S. Ratković Dr Nada I. Vidić Contemporary Forms in Tourism ..5 Sopotnički vodopadi u funkciji Turističke vrednosti muzejskih
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Systematic Position of Lindbergia Garganoensis
    Revision of the systematic position of Lindbergia garganoensis Gittenberger & Eikenboom, 2006, with reassignment to Vitrea Fitzinger, 1833 (Gastropoda, Eupulmonata, Pristilomatidae) Gianbattista Nardi Via Boschette 8A, 25064 Gussago (Brescia), Italy; [email protected] [corresponding author] Antonio Braccia Via Ischia 19, 25100 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] Simone Cianfanelli Museum System of University of Florence, Zoological Section “La Specola”, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy; [email protected] & Marco Bodon c/o Museum System of University of Florence, Zoological Section “La Specola”, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy; [email protected] Nardi, G., Braccia, A., Cianfanelli, S. & Bo- INTRODUCTION don, M., 2019. Revision of the systematic position of Lindbergia garganoensis Gittenberger & Eiken- Lindbergia garganoensis Gittenberger & Eikenboom, 2006 boom, 2006, with reassignment to Vitrea Fitzinger, is the first species of the genus, Lindbergia Riedel, 1959 to 1833 (Gastropoda, Eupulmonata, Pristilomatidae). be discovered in Italy. The genus Lindbergia encompasses – Basteria 83 (1-3): 19-28. Leiden. Published 6 April 2019 about ten different species, endemic to the Greek mainland, Crete, the Cycladic islands, Dodecanese islands, northern Aegean islands, and southern Turkey (Riedel, 1992, 1995, 2000; Welter-Schultes, 2012; Bank & Neubert, 2017). Due to Lindbergia garganoensis Gittenberger & Eikenboom, 2006, lack of anatomical data, some of these species remain ge- a taxon with mainly a south-Balkan distribution, is the only nerically questionable. Up to now, L. garganoensis was only Italian species assigned to the genus Lindbergia Riedel, 1959. known by the presence of very fine spiral striae on the tel- The assignment to this genus, as documented by the pecu- eoconch and by the general shape of its shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitorul Oficial Partea I
    PARTEA I Anul 175 (XIX) — Nr. 536 LEGI, DECRETE, HOTĂRÂRI ȘI ALTE ACTE Marți, 7 august 2007 SUMAR Nr. Pagina HOTĂRÂRI ALE GUVERNULUI ROMÂNIEI 856. — Hotărâre privind repartizarea de sume defalcate din taxa pe valoarea adăugată pentru finanțarea Programului de dezvoltare a infrastructurii și a unor baze sportive din spațiul rural .................................... 2–32 2 MONITORUL OFICIAL AL ROMÂNIEI, PARTEA I, Nr. 536/7.VIII.2007 HOTĂRÂRI ALE GUVERNULUI ROMÂNIEI GUVERNUL ROMÂNIEI HOTĂRÂRE privind repartizarea de sume defalcate din taxa pe valoarea adăugată pentru finanțarea Programului de dezvoltare a infrastructurii și a unor baze sportive din spațiul rural Având în vedere prevederile art. 8 alin. (2) din Ordonanța Guvernului nr. 7/2006 privind instituirea Programului de dezvoltare a infrastructurii și a unor baze sportive din spațiul rural, aprobată cu modificări și completări prin Legea nr. 71/2007, în temeiul art. 108 din Constituția României, republicată, și al prevederilor Legii bugetului de stat pe anul 2007 nr. 486/2006, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, Guvernul României adoptă prezenta hotărâre. Art. 1. — (1) Se aprobă repartizarea sumei de 208.005 mii lei, Art. 3. — Unităților administrativ-teritoriale prevăzute în pe proiecte și pe tranșe, din sumele defalcate din taxa pe anexele nr. 1 și 2 li se asigură finanțarea proiectelor respective valoarea adăugată pentru finanțarea Programului de dezvoltare din sume defalcate din taxa pe valoarea adăugată, alocate a infrastructurii și a unor baze sportive din spațiul rural, pe anul bugetelor locale, până la nivelul sumei rezultate în urma 2007, după cum urmează: îndeplinirii procedurii de atribuire a contractului de achiziție a) tranșa a doua, potrivit anexei nr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive List of the Ants of Romania (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 1
    Myrmecologische Nachrichten 9 65 - 76 Wien, Dezember 2006 A comprehensive list of the ants of Romania (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 1 Bálint MARKÓ, Botond SIPOS, Sándor CSŐSZ, Klára KISS, István BOROS & László GALLÉ Abstract In the last decades the ant checklists of most Central and Eastern European countries were updated, with the exception of Romania. The last Romanian checklist was published in 1978 and contained only 76 species. The present work lists all species mentioned in publications until 2006. Up to now, altogether 103 valid species were recorded in the Romanian fauna (102 outdoor species), besides these there are eleven species of uncertain occurrence in Romania and two names which cannot be assigned to existing valid species. The comparison of Romanian and other Central and Eastern Euro- pean myrmecofaunas reveals that the Romanian fauna is insufficiently known and that a considerable number of spe- cies (mostly parasitic and Mediterranean) remains to be detected. Key words: Ants, Romania, check-list, faunistics, new records, comparison, Central and Eastern Europe. Dr. Bálint Markó (contact author), Botond Sipos & István Boros, Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, str. Clinicilor nr. 5-7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Dr. Sándor Csősz, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13, 1088 Budapest, Hun- gary. E-mail: [email protected] Klára Kiss & Prof. Dr. László Gallé, Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, 6701 Szeged, P.O.Box 51, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] Klára Kiss, Department of Horticulture, Sapientia University, Sighişoarei 1C, jud.
    [Show full text]
  • Administraţia Bazinală De Apă Mureş
    PLANUL DE MANAGEMENT AL RISCULUI LA INUNDAŢII Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş Planul de Management al Riscului la Inundaţii Administraţia Bazinală de Apă Mureş CUPRINS Abrevieri ................................................................................................................................... 4 Cap. 1: Prezentarea generală a bazinului hidrografic Mureș .................................................. 6 Cap. 2: Riscul la inundaţii în bazinul hidrografic Mureş ....................................................... 14 2.1. Descrierea lucrărilor existente de protecție împotriva inundațiilor ............................. 14 2.2. Descrierea sistemelor existente de avertizare - alarmare şi de răspuns la inundaţii ............................................................................................ 43 2.3. Istoricul inundaţiilor .................................................................................................... 51 2.4. Evenimentele semnificative de inundaţii ..................................................................... 53 2.5. Zone cu risc potențial semnificativ la inundații ........................................................... 55 2.6. Hărți de hazard și hărți de risc la inundații .................................................................. 59 2.7. Indicatori statistici ....................................................................................................... 63 Cap. 3: Descrierea obiectivelor
    [Show full text]
  • Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive
    Continuing previous meetings: Forum Carpaticum 2010 (Krakow, Poland), Forum Carpaticum 2012 (Stará Lesná, Slovakia), Forum Carpaticum 2014 (Lviv, Ukraine), Forum Carpaticum 2016 (Bucharest, Romania) addresses the need to make a bridge of smart sustainable development in the Carpathians with scientists, stakeholders, institutions, NGOs, communities. The Carpathian Region – the Green Backbone of Europe – faces many opportunities as well as challenges to the future development of the area. The stakeholders, decision makers and research communities can use them wisely for the enhanced protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. These overall goals meet well with the EU 2020 Cohesion Policy, which proposes “Smart”, “Sustainable” and “Inclusive” to be the keywords when addressing the main priorities for the near future. Forum Carpaticum 2016 „Future of the Carpathians: Smart, Sustainable, Inclusive“ proposes to concentrate on these priorities and to debate how they can be implemented in the Carpathian Region, during the following main thematic sessions: Smart Carpathians session aims to present and discuss the leading edge achievements in: recent and future information and communication technologies; emerging paradigms and methodological developments; front-rank research infrastructures, capacities and innovations; open knowledge, information and data systems applications, in particular those of Carpathian interest. Sustainable Carpathians is expected to cover the topics that consider: climate change adaptation, risk prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Network 2013
    NETWORK 2013 Summer Survey of Jackals’ Habitat in RAMSAR Units, SE Romania REPORT Time: 17th to 21st of July 2013 Location: Comana Natural Park Reserve and Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve, South Romania Called by: Ovidiu Banea, Ecology Department of Crispus NGO Sibiu Romania RESULTS I. Agenda Topics 1. To break (disclose) SKUANature objectives and schedule broader activities if available in Periprava area, Danube Delta. Share tourism destinations and build future eco-trekking programs. Pictures instead of bullets! A welcomed initiative of Skua Nature Ecotourism and Ultima Frontiera Hotel and Touristic Complex in Periprava, RAMSAR, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Near Periprava is located the most beautiful and high standards hotel in Danube Delta, Ultima Frontiera. At the beginning of 2013, Stefano an Italian GOJAGE send us the most beautiful photos of jackals ever made in Romania. These photos of wildlife were made at Periprava on the wildlife observatory installed by SKUA Nature ecotourism organization. An Italian tourism entrepreneur was chosen by Hotelul ULTIMA FRONTIERA to optimize the wildlife tourism into the most remote area of the Romanian Danube Delta, Periprava. At the beginning, Crispus NGO lodged a complaint to the same SKUA Nature due to the apparent inadequate wildlife stimulation and human intrusism into ecological network of jackals. If we analyze all our reports since 2008 together with Giannatos WWF report in Greece, Lapini updated review to 2011 or Szabo-Heltai-Lanszki work to Jackal versus livestock we can easy find that jackals are human dependent and that this mammal changes easy its behavior to fight for eat. In the case of wildlife observatory we cannot talk of predation but yes we can see valuable scene of competition between different top level predators or scavengers as the White-tailed Eagle , Haliaeetus albicilla, jackals Canis aureus or Corvidae.
    [Show full text]