Network 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wetlands on Danube Delta Bioisphere Reserve
Wetland conservation and sustainable use in Romania Dr. Grigore Baboianu, Executive director, Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Romania 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 “Wetlands: home and destination” Romania Total surface: 238,391 km2 Inhabitants: 19,042,936 (2011) Etnic Groups: Romanian 89%, Hungarian 7.5%, Gipsy 1.9%, German & others 1.6% Position: Central South-Eastern 450 N Latitude 250 E Longitude Climate: Temperate (8 -110 C) Rainfall: 400-600 l/y 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Relief: Mountains (35%) - Carpathian, 910 km - Dobrogea Hills (35%) Plains (30%) Black Sea (245 km) Danube Delta (3,510 km2) 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Wetlands in Romania In Romania there were inventoried: Lakes: 3,450 (2,650 km2 - 1,1%): mountain (glacial, carst, vulcanoes), floodplain, reservoirs, marine and coastal lagoons and lakes of Danube Delta. Rivers: 120,000 km: (Danube River (1,075 km), 28 rivers >162 km (8,096 km)) Swamps: 215 (52 km2) Map of wetlands distribution in Romania 11TH Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Main use/role of wetlands: Flood Control Groundwater Replenishment Shoreline Stabilisation & Storm Protection Sediment & Nutrient Retention and Export Climate Change Mitigation Water Purification Reservoirs -
Romanian Species of Lucanids (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Lucanidae) in the Collections of “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History MELANIA STAN
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 décembre «Grigore Antipa» Vol. LVI (2) pp. 173–184 2013 DOI: 10.2478/travmu-2013-0013 ROMANIAN SPECIES OF LUCANIDS (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEOIDEA: LUCANIDAE) IN THE COLLECTIONS OF “GRIGORE ANTIPA” NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY MELANIA STAN Abstract. The seven species of stag beetles of the Romanian fauna are present in the coleopteran collection of the Museum: Aesalus scarabaeoides scarabaeoides (Panzer), Ceruchus chrysomelinus (Hochenwarth), Sinodendron cylindricum (Linnaeus), Lucanus cervus cervus (Linnaeus), Platycerus caraboides caraboides (Linnaeus), Platycerus caprea (De Geer) and Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus). Information on the collecting data and distribution maps are given for each species. We present the male and female habitus for the two species of Platycerus. Résumé. Les sept espèces de lucanes de la faune de Roumanie sont présentes dans la collection des coléoptères du muséum: Aesalus scarabaeoides scarabaeoides (Panzer), Ceruchus chrysomelinus (Hochenwarth), Sinodendron cylindricum (Linnaeus), Lucanus cervus cervus (Linnaeus), Platycerus caraboides caraboides (Linnaeus), Platycerus caprea (De Geer) et Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus). On donne des informations sur les données de la capture et les cartes de distribution pour chaque espèce. Nous présentons les photos de l’habitus mâle et femelle pour les deux espèces de Platycerus. Key words: Coleoptera, Lucanidae, Romania, collections, “Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History. INTRODUCTION From the 17 stag beetle species and subspecies of Europe, in the Romanian fauna there are only seven species: Aesalus scarabaeoides scarabaeoides (Panzer), Ceruchus chrysomelinus (Hochenwarth), Sinodendron cylindricum (Linnaeus), Lucanus cervus cervus (Linnaeus), Platycerus caraboides caraboides (Linnaeus), Platycerus caprea (De Geer) and Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus), included in four subfamilies, according to the Catalogue of the Palaearctic Coleoptera (Bartolozzi & Sprecher-Uebersax, 2006). -
Book of Abstracts
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Făgăraș Mountains An inventory towards a new National Park Book of abstracts 10–11 Conference organised by the Institute of Biology Bucharest December 2018 (IBB)‑Romanian Academy, Foundation Conservation “Ion Heliade Rădulescu” Carpathia (FCC) and the Faculty of Amphitheatre, Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry The Romanian Academy and Environmental Protection, 125 Calea Victoriei Blvd. ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu (ULBS), in partnership with IUCN WCPA (International Union for Conservation of Nature and World Commission on Protected Areas). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Făgăraș Mountains An inventory towards a new National Park Book of abstracts 10–11 Conference organised by the Institute of Biology Bucharest December 2018 (IBB)‑Romanian Academy, Foundation Conservation “Ion Heliade Rădulescu” Carpathia (FCC) and the Faculty of Amphitheatre, Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry The Romanian Academy and Environmental Protection, 125 Calea Victoriei, ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu Bucharest (ULBS), in partnership with IUCN WCPA (International Union for Conservation of Nature and World Commission on Protected Areas). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE Făgăraș Mountains An inventory towards a new National Park Book of abstracts ISBN: 978-606-998-060-6 Publisher: Ars Docendi Graphic design: Dragoș LAZARIN Desktop publishing: Marian CONSTANTIN Scientific committee Dr. Dumitru MURARIU Institute of Biology Bucharest of the Romanian Academy Dr. Anca MANOLE Institute of Biology Bucharest of the Romanian Academy MSc Barbara PROMBERGER-FÜRPASS Foundation Conservation Carpathia Dr. Oliviu Grigore POP Foundation Conservation Carpathia Dr. Sorin ŞTEFĂNUŢ Institute of Biology Bucharest of the Romanian Academy Prof. Camelia SAVA Faculty for Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry and Environmental Protection Assoc. Prof. Maria-Mihaela ANTOFIE Faculty for Agricultural Sciences, Food Industry and Environmental Protection Dr. -
Tourist Attractiveness of Ramsar Wetlands. Case Study: Lakes of Champagne Humide (France) and Comana Natural Park (Romania)
Water resources and wetlands, Editors: Petre Gâştescu, William Lewis Jr., Petre Breţcan Conference Proceedings, 14-16 September 2012, Tulcea - Romania ISBN: 978-606-605-038-8 TOURIST ATTRACTIVENESS OF RAMSAR WETLANDS. CASE STUDY: LAKES OF CHAMPAGNE HUMIDE (FRANCE) AND COMANA NATURAL PARK (ROMANIA) Luc Florent1, Gabriela Toroimac2 1Groupe ESC TROYES, Troyes, France, [email protected] 2University of Bucarest, Faculty of Geography, Bucharest, Romania, [email protected] Abstract. It is difficult to understand what contributes to tourist attractiveness of a territory. Labels have an important role, because they guarantee the quality of destination. Even if several labels have a different initial function, they may turn into important elements of tourism advertising, like in the cases of UNESCO and Natural Park labels. Besides these highly promoted labels, there are others less known by the general public, but prestigious for professionals, like the Ramsar label. Ramsar label is related to the homonymous convention signed in 1971; Ramsar List includes wetlands considered of international importance for waterfowl at any season and also in term of ecology, botany, zoology, limnology and hydrology. Tourism scientific literature ignores the attractiveness of the Ramsar label. Therefore the main goal of our paper is to analyse the Ramsar label as an element of tourist attractiveness. Our study is conducted on two Ramsar wetlands: Lakes of Champagnes Humide in France and Comana Natural Park in Romania. Our contribution relies on exploratory questionnaires, focused on tourists’ motivation for choosing theses destinations; the questions concern mainly their perception of nature protection and conservation, recognition of environmental protection labels, main reason of their journey, their interest for leisure activities, and the distance from their place of residence. -
Biodiversity Conservation and the Regime of Protected Areas
Acta Universitatis George Bacovia. Juridica - Volume 10. Issue 1/2021 - http://juridica.ugb.ro/ - Nelu NIȚĂ, Nicoleta-Elena HEGHEȘ Biodiversity conservation and the regime of protected areas Nelu NIȚĂ, PhD George Bacovia University, Bacau, Romania [email protected] Nicoleta-Elena HEGHEȘ, Ph.D „Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University of Bucharest Bucharest, Romania [email protected] Abstract: The time has come for us, human beings, intelligent and conscious beings, to understand and remember that no one and nothing can survive without protecting the natural environment in which we live, which has long been not given due "respect". And this, until it is not too late, given that biodiversity is currently under serious threat worldwide, with consequences that are difficult to quantify, including by scientists. Through this study we aimed to raise awareness of the serious consequences of continuous loss of biodiversity worldwide and the need to comply with regulations specific to this area, for our benefit, but especially for future generations, for which we have a great responsibility. In this sense, we consider the synthetic presentation of the international, European and national legislative framework of the broad and complex process that underlies the conservation of biodiversity, aspects that can be useful to all persons interested in protecting the environment around us. Keywords: biodiversity; biodiversity conservation; procedural guidelines; biodiversity strategies; protected areas. Framing subdomain: Internațional Law and EU-Legislation Introduction “Biodiversity” is an increasingly common used term to highlight the richness of the natural environment in which we live and work, consisting of the immense variety of birds, animals and plants, as well as their habitats and genes [1]. -
THE DEVELOPMENT of ECOTOURISM in PROTECTED AREAS STUDY CASE: COMANA NATIONAL PARK Alina‐Gabriela Neacsu, Patricia Dodu
74 Romanian Economic and Business Review – Vol. 14, number 2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECOTOURISM IN PROTECTED AREAS STUDY CASE: COMANA NATIONAL PARK Alina‐Gabriela Neacsu, Patricia Dodu Abstract It has been proven in the last years, that integrating the ecotourism as an instrument of sustainable development of protected areas represent a beneficial method in the management of the latter, including results regarding the economic prosperity of the local communities, besides important results obtained at the level of protection and conservation of concerned areas generated by tourism revenues. In other words, additionally to a positive environmental impact, the proper handle of ecotourism, generates direct effects on the economic progress, education and the perception regarding the identity of surrounding communities, creating interdependence win-win relationships between the protected area and the inhabitants. In Romania, a country with a high ecotouristic potential, the official steps taken by the authorities in implementing this form of tourism either are delayed, or have been adopted in a declarative way, which is why Romania has only two declared destinations of ecotourism. Comana National Park is a treasure on the Romanian land, with a rare biological diversity, fully deserving the title of “The second Romanian Danube Delta” and the enrolment on the UNESCO World Heritage list. The Comana National Park case, in which the ecotourism expansion strategy has obvious lacks respecting a practical point of view, is one of the protected areas in which ecotourism may become a real balance factor among conservation and sustainable economic evolution. Keywords: Sustainable development; Ecotourism; Protected Areas; Comana Park JEL Classification: Z30 Introduction Not often tourists visiting a protected area are passionate about nature or amazed by its biodiversity. -
Green Infrastructure Sustainable Investments for the Benefit of Both People and Nature March 2011
Green Infrastructure Sustainable Investments for the Benefit of Both People and Nature March 2011 The report was prepared by: Giurgiu County Council, Miruna Dudau Authors: Irene Lucius, Raluca Dan and Dana Caratas, WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme | Franziska Mey, Julia Steinert and Peter Torkler | WWF Germany Layout: Michal Stránský Cover photo: © Hartmut Jungius/WWF-Canon Thanks to everyone who commented and contributed to this report. This report was published by the SURF-nature project www.surf-nature.eu This project is funded by the EU’s European Regional Development fund through the INTERREG IVC programme. Green infrastructure Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................2 1. What is green infrastructure and why do we need it? ............3 1.1. Biodiversity and ecosystem services ............................................3 1.2. Ecosystems must be able to adapt ...............................................3 1.3. Green infrastructure – the concept ..............................................4 2. EU policy in support of green infrastructure ..........................9 3. How to build green infrastructure .........................................11 3.1. Integrated planning needed ........................................................ 11 3.2. Mitigation measures ....................................................................... 12 4. Financing opportunities for green infrastructure measures .........................................14 4.1. Strategic -
Invasive Terrestrial Plant Species in the Romanian Protected Areas. a Review of the Geographical Aspects
FOLIA OECOLOGICA – vol. 47, no. 2 (2020), doi: 10.2478/foecol-2020-0020 Invasive terrestrial plant species in the Romanian protected areas. A review of the geographical aspects Ines Grigorescu1, Gheorghe Kucsicsa1*, Monica Dumitrașcu1, Mihai Doroftei2 1Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy, 12 D. Racoviţă Street, sect. 2, 023993, Bucharest, Romania 2Danube Delta National Institute, 165 Babadag Street, 820112, Tulcea, Romania Abstract Grigorescu, I., Kucsicsa, G., Dumitrașcu, M., Doroftei, M., 2020. Invasive terrestrial plant species in the Romanian protected areas. A review of the geographical aspects. Folia Oecologica, 47 (2): 168–177. Geographical factors play an essential role in the occurrence and spread of invasive species worldwide, and their particular analysis at regional and local scales becomes important in understanding species development patterns. The present paper discusses the relationships between some key geographical factors and the Inva- sive Terrestrial Plant Species (ITPS) distribution, and their environmental implications in a few protected are- as in Romania. The authors focused their attention on three of the foremost invaders (i.e. Amorpha fruticosa, Ailanthus altissima and Fallopia japonica) making use of the information provided by the scientific literature and some illustrative examples developed in the framework of the FP7 enviroGRIDS project. The study is ai- med to increase the knowledge of the ITPS and, specifically, to contribute to the geographical understanding of the role played by the driving factors in their distribution and spread in various habitats and ecosystems. The results will further support the control efforts in protected areas where, often, valuable native species are at risk of being replaced by non-native species. -
History, Tradition and Continuity in Tourism
Annals of „Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University – Economy, Commerce and Tourism Series Volume III/2011 Ecotourism: Important Segment of the Romanian Tourism Irina Dragulanescu University of Messina, Faculty of Economics, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Adriana Ionescu Christian University “Dimitrie Cantemir”, Faculty of Tourism and Commercial Management, Constanţa, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The application of current principles of sustainable tourism development in natural areas has led to the emergence of ecotourism as a distinct form of tourism, designed to respect the integrity of natural landscapes, ecological biodiversity, in accordance with the requirements of certain segments of tourists, who want to spend their holidays in nature. This study aims to present the current situation of protected natural areas and stage of development of ecotourism activities within and around them and come up with a set of strategic proposals to guide recovery efforts for these destinations through ecotourism, in accordance with the requirements of national legislation and international conventions to which Romania is a party. Keywords: ecotourism, ecotourist, ecotourism resources, protected areas, ecotourism programs. J.E.L. Classification: O13, Q26 1. Introduction Ecotourism is a form of alternative tourism and must include the following elements: the product is based on nature and its elements, environmental management in the service of a minimal impact, contribution to conservation contribution to the welfare of local communities, environmental education. A definition of law in Romania officially taken over is that: ecotourism is a form of tourism is the primary objective observation and awareness of the nature and value of local traditions and which must meet the following conditions: a) contribute to the conservation and protection of nature; b) use of local human resources, c) have an educational, respect for nature - awareness of tourists and local communities, d) have insignificant negative impact. -
CARPATHIAN NETWORK of PROTECTED AREAS CARPATES12P 27/11/07 16:04 Page 2
CARPATES12P 27/11/07 16:04 Page 1 The Carpathian natural and cultural heritage: A wealth to be protected on an international level CARPATHIAN NETWORK OF PROTECTED AREAS CARPATES12P 27/11/07 16:04 Page 2 a. s. l., the countryside of the … under human influence scale farms were saved from land Carpathians is extremely various. This Besides this natural diversity, this mountain range possesses collectivisation and represent today extraordinary natural and ecological also an extremely rich cultural heritage important landscape elements. diversity makes them of the main natural habitats in Europe, with traditional economic activities. Unfortunately, for several sheltering almost 4.000 plant species, of which one third are Seven different nations with seven decades human activi- An area of an extreme richness endemic, to the largest European population of large carni- diverse languages and a heteroge- ties have had a negative influence on the Carpathian mountain range covers about 209.000 km2 vores (bear, wolf, lynx) as well as one of neous history have influenced the evolu- countryside and the biodiversity rather in of the Central and Eastern Europe, extending from largest European forest regions. The tion of the countryside for hundreds of years. the negative way. Some areas are over- Austria to Serbia, covering most of Slovakia and variety of conservation The Carpathian landscape has been formed by far- industrialized, big ski resorts have been deve- Romania as well as parts of the Czech Republic, policies and different ming activities over a long loped, often very near or inside a protected Hungary, Poland and Ukraine. cultures makes the time. -
Stapledon Memorial Trust Report: Surveying River Pasture Grassland
Stapledon Memorial Trust Report: Surveying river pasture grassland for Invasive Non-Native Species in Arieş Region of Transylvania and Comana Natural Park, South of Bucharest 23rd June – 8th July 2018 Jodey Peyton Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB Contents Contacts .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Aim .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Activity Log .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Day 1 ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Day 2 ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Day 3 ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Day 4 .................................................................................................................................................. -
Differences in the Natural Areas Protection in the Czech Republic and Romania: a Socioeconomic View
DIFFERENCES IN THE NATURAL AREAS PROTECTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND ROMANIA: A SOCIOECONOMIC VIEW Petra Hlaváčková1, Ciprian Palaghianu2 1 Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic 2 Department of Forestry and Environmental protection, Forestry Faculty, Stefan cel Mare Univeristy of Suceava 13, Universitatii Street, 720229, Suceava, Romania Abstract The paper is focused on the differences in the natural areas protection in the Czech Republic (CR) and Romania, considering the socioeconomic perspective. Further, the main aspects of nature conservation in both countries are discussed. They result from differences in economic and political development, and different natural conditions in both countries. The total area under protection in Czech Republic is 1.28 million hectares (16.2% of the territory) and in Romania 5.57 million hectares (23.4%). In both countries, the nature conservation is focused mainly on large-scale protected areas. In these areas there are constant interactions between local people and the natural environment. Therefore, such areas represent places with high social and economic value. In the CR, the large- scale protected areas include mainly national parks and protected landscape areas. In total these protected areas cover about 15.5% of the territory. In Romania national and natural parks cover 4.6% of the territory (not including the Danube Delta). The article deals with the European context of nature conservation and outlines specific differences in the nature protection legislation in both countries. It also focuses on organizations dealing with large-scale protected areas management and problems resulting from the interaction of nature conservation and local residents.